Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Capn (0)  

Feedback:   All (1886)  |   Reviews (17)  |   Comments (167)  |   Replies (1702)

Other:   Replies Received (778)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 751-775 of 778 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
751
N/A REPLY TO #12 from messmer: (Capn's Reply)

I know, Capn. I put my hand over my wife's eyes every time one of those naked critters appeared. Ladies should be spared sights like that.

09-17-09  03:17pm

Reply
752
N/A REPLY TO #7 from turboshaft: (Capn's Reply)

Well, unless you live here (the U.S.) you probably don't know the half of it. In fact, even if you do live hear you still probably don't know the half of it -- ignorance really can be bliss!

09-17-09  01:48pm

Reply
753
Visit YouStrip

YouStrip
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from badandy400: (Capn's Reply)

I almost guarantee they are flash. They are just a bit difficult to detect. The membership is for a year so it is not that huge of a deal to download them, I just like having everything local so that I am not using my small bandwidth downloading the same thing more than once.

09-15-09  01:20pm

Reply
754
Visit YouStrip

YouStrip
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from badandy400: (Capn's Reply)

I am betting there is a way to download the videos. I am working on it right now. At least on the home page they have the right click disabled which makes my download manager very unhappy. Something tells me there is a way though. If I can figure it out I might actually join because I like the concept.

09-15-09  01:07pm

Reply
755
Visit YouStrip

YouStrip
(0)
Reply of Capn's Review from mbaya:

I see you mention the videos are of variable quality. How good are the best ones? Is that quality rare?

09-13-09  05:46pm

Reply
756
Visit Naughty Mag

Naughty Mag
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from WeeWillyWinky: (Capn's Reply)

Hi Capn,

Thanks for the trust vote and for all the replies. Now, if I can answer your question:

It has been a long while since I've been to the site, and I should stress that I NEVER download hardcore picture sets. They bore me to tears. I've taken a few b/g stills featuring a model I like, or if the pic in interesting in other ways, but I've never downloaded a complete set. So, when I look at what I collected from Naughty Mag, all I have are solo-model sets and a handful of videos. The vids were all yawnfests, except for a scant few. The solo sets were very good, as far as I'm concerned, because they were well-edited, didn't use dozens of shots with no noticeable change in pose, and because they featured undies which I like: more towards full-cut, full-back as opposed to thongs and "sexy" stuff. Mind you, I am an archive-miner, as I like the way they did things back in the late ninetees, early oughts. I can't comment on newer sets since I didn't focus much on them. I would imagine they have caught up with the modern trends just like ATK and the like.

If memory serves, there was the usual amount of toy/masturbation stuff, as well as lots of hardcore, but I honestly cannot say what the ratio would be between hard and soft. Sorry. It's been too long and I was there for the archives.


09-12-09  08:38pm

Reply
757
Visit Village Ladies

Village Ladies
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from messmer: (Capn's Reply)

See my response to Pink Panther under answers to your comment on "strip tease," in the forum. That's why this site would have been so good. The ladies take a long time getting undressed, most wear old fashioned lingerie .. just my cup of tea. The only thing I would like them to add is a bit more "pink" at the end of each set. Some are a bit too coy.

09-12-09  01:46pm

Reply
758
Visit Village Ladies

Village Ladies
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from messmer: (Capn's Reply)

You are right, Capn. As a matter of fact it's exactly this type of site I am looking for, however I am not prepared to put up with outdated, low quality stuff. Especially if it can't even be zipped.

Also, as I mentioned above, I did not like the webmaster's attitude. He had that arrogant "take us as we are or buzz off" attitude in his email to me which spoke volumes when it comes to his willingness to bring his site into the 21st century.


09-12-09  01:26pm

Reply
759
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(0)
Reply of Capn's Review from WeeWillyWinky:

Hi Capn,

In regard to not commenting on videos: I see your point, since you don't care for video, but there is a way to be simple and totally objective about commenting on it. For instance, download a few, and get some basic stats, for instance:

"Vids are mostly 640x480, bitrates averaging about 2000k." This doesn't pass any real judgment on them and you don't have to look at them at all, and the information can be helpful to people who are considering a subscription. You might also touch on other points, as in, do they contain a music track, does the videographer yakkety-yak his way through the vid, or perhaps he believes he is the Fellini of porn and films everything while standing on his head...

Even if this info has been passed on by other reviewers, it still improves your own review and makes it more complete. I'm more of a pic guy myself, so I understand where you're coming from.

I didn't read through the whole exchange so apologies if someone has already said all of this.


09-11-09  08:47pm

Reply
760
Visit Glamure Babes

Glamure Babes
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from messmer: (Capn's Reply)

Never thought of that, Capn, but you're absolutely right. Another reason to change the spelling or the name altogether.

09-08-09  06:15pm

Reply
761
Visit Strip Game Central

Strip Game Central
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from mbaya: (Capn's Reply)

The situation is exactly the same as when I complained about it in my review. The site has links to its reviews, with the comment that they want to list them all. I doubt my review is there. The webmaster mentioned in the site forum that he felt his policy of having available on the site only the most recent videos works best for him and he doesn't need those who sign up for only one month.

09-08-09  05:05pm

Reply
762
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from GCode: (Capn's Reply)

I am getting a better understanding and can agree to an extent on how you feel about a mature woman dressed in glam. However, the main point I'm getting at is that is like 1/4, if not less of the content on this site is glamour; so I don't understand how this can be a such a huge setback for you. I'd say more than half of the photos are featuring the women in everyday clothes. Isn't that what you want? (confused).

I am not trying to give you a hard time at all. But, I am just trying to understand your scoring for the site. A site that mixes up content with solo, lesbianism, and hardcore should be more praised, even if the solo content is what you want mostly. I just don't see how this is a negative aspect of a site and worthy of points being reduced.

Right on with the only commenting on only photography. However, I only think doing this will be a set back for your reviews in the future to not include some info on them. But, to each it's own.

But, to sum it up, I don't think I'm going to fully understand the scoring of this review without some more clarification about as to why certain aspects are cut down. However, these are opinion based reviews and just because I don't understand or fully agree with the review does not mean I am right. Thanks for your time.


09-08-09  03:41pm

Reply
763
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(0)
Reply of Capn's Review from GCode:

I'm a bit confused as far as the mainstream glam remark? Maybe just the elegant ladies category but I found more than half the outfits to be regular attire worn to the mall or them doing regular household chores. I think there is a superior mix of glam with different outfits. Plus, there is a lot of working woman attire (I.E.: secretary) which I would never qualify as glamour at all.

I do agree with the fact that not all models are beauties. I think this is due to the site trying to update so much quickly that they cannot pick and choose quality models for updates. But, with talks about this with messmer and others, one person's gem of a woman can be another person's hag.

I'm not trying to ridicule or be negative, but I dislike the fact that this review had no comment about the videos. It's not fair for the site which has both quality photography and videography to only be judged on your opinion of the quality of photography. But, this is just my opinion.

To move on, while personally I think the score is a bit low, I just can't figure out why the score is so low. 77 is a bit average for this site in my opinion. All I can see for the reason that the site is scored a bit lower than I think is because you think there is too much glamour photos, it features hardcore plus solo, and not all the models are hot? Interesting.

Thanks for the review and welcome to PU. I hope to see more reviews soon. Take care.


09-08-09  10:44am

Reply
764
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams
(0)
Reply of Capn's Comment from Drooler:

Capn! Hold your head high when telling us that you like photosets! There's absolutely no need to be apologetic about it. It's not "out of fashion."

There will always be photos, babes, and photo lovers!


09-07-09  03:31pm

Reply
765
Visit Strip Game Central

Strip Game Central
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from mbaya: (Capn's Reply)

I am a former member and wrote the review that PU has posted. Iknow he has clips for sale. That was what I was asking about.

09-07-09  03:05pm

Reply
766
Visit Ero Berlin

Ero Berlin
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Drooler: (Capn's Reply)

Yeah, there was quite a lot of clicking & counting, and also downloading this 'n that. Would've taken less time had there been fewer problems with the site.

09-07-09  02:19pm

Reply
767
Visit Strip Game Central

Strip Game Central
(0)
Reply of Capn's Comment from mbaya:

Is it still true that very few high quality videos are available and that you have to pay extra for the archived ones?

09-07-09  02:00pm

Reply
768
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(0)
Reply of Capn's Review from RagingBuddhist:

I can't argue the score you gave the site if it didn't work for you, but I don't understand how you can knock it for trying to appeal to a wide range of tastes. I guess you could call women over the age of 30 a niche, but it's not like they're a women in chocolate sauce site and they started branching out into vegetable based condiments. Being over 30 isn't really a constriction (unless you have a need to get asked for ID at the bar). I guess I'm just not sure how offering variety can be a bad thing. One of the things I've always liked about AO30 is that just about every update includes something from a different category. A new model, a solo video, a new picture set from an existing model, etc.

09-07-09  12:40pm

Reply
769
Visit Only Tease

Only Tease
(0)
Reply of Capn's Comment from mbaya:

I agree totally. I understand they are trying to fill a niche, but they act like nudity is a big problem for them. I expected softcore, but not what I saw here.

09-06-09  02:48pm

Reply
770
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from The Bishop: (Capn's Reply)

Cheers,

Glad you do :)


09-06-09  01:00pm

Reply
771
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(0)
Reply of Capn's Review from messmer:

I agree with the points you made, Capn, but here we have once again one of those attempts by a site to make it right for everyone and for you and me their effort has backfired while others are delighted to finally find the hardcore they've been looking for. Chacun a son gout, I guess, I just wish there were more sites for mon gout!

09-06-09  10:31am

Reply
772
Visit Anilos

Anilos
(0)
REPLY TO #7 from messmer: (Capn's Reply)

I like this site very much, it still doesn't present as much slinky lingerie as I would prefer but most models wear a bit more than just skin under their dresses, so in that respect I would rate the site a bit higher than All Over 30, another of my favorites.

09-06-09  09:41am

Reply
773
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from messmer: (Capn's Reply)

There are daily updates, Capn, but they used to drive me crazy, same as they do on most 21 sextury sites (a frustrated aside) .. instead of releasing a complete video they'll drag things out by presenting segments over a period of time. I know you're not into videos so this will be of limited interest to you.

Quite frankly, I cannot remember if they had a daily update when it came to pictures (I think they did), but not a multi-model one. Maybe someone else has a better memory. :-)


09-06-09  09:36am

Reply
774
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
REPLY TO #8 from messmer: (Capn's Reply)

My preference would be 100% landscape. I love a picture that fills the whole screen.

09-06-09  09:29am

Reply
775
Visit Naked News

Naked News
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from messmer: (Capn's Reply)

Sigh!!! There's never enough stripping, anywhere .. for me. The tease element has largely gone out of Porn. Younger users are impatient, they want to get to nekkid and the action as quickly as possible.

09-06-09  09:26am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 751-775 of 778 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.98 seconds.