| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Casting Couch X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bibo:
(Capn's Reply)
Yes, definitely, Capn.
IMO, the pictures are nothing to write home about, compared to other, more picture friendly sites.
|
12-10-12 12:46pm
|
Reply
102
|
Tease 4 You
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Denner:
Like the preview: It's a network - British. Never been a member - but seen a lot of their material around - and seriously think about joining - so yes, any other views here would be welcome from this user, too.
|
12-09-12 07:39am
|
Reply
103
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from MiztaBlu:
(Capn's Reply)
Thanks for the well thought out responses guys.
And capn, I completely agree, but there are some sites that do it very well, like Photodrom and MCNudes. AllOver30 has alot to offer, but its handcuffed IMO for the reasons I mentioned.
|
12-07-12 01:11am
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Cybertoad:
(Capn's Reply)
Really Capn???? hehehe
|
12-04-12 03:57pm
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Cybertoad:
(Capn's Reply)
Going to agree with Capn especially pictures the quality is much better.
|
12-03-12 12:07pm
|
Reply
106
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(Capn's Reply)
Definitely not. Too bad too because so many of the models are really beautiful.
|
12-01-12 07:41pm
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Cybertoad:
(Capn's Reply)
Poor Capn we are gonna have to come up with a poll for picture too.
I like pics allot just not my main attraction mainly cause I never can find a great viewer with ease to my stuff.
|
11-28-12 11:15am
|
Reply
108
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#21
from Tree Rodent:
(Capn's Reply)
Yes Capn, Epoch is number one with me for that reason alone. It appears CCBill doesn't exchange currencies at what I would consider to be a fair and reasonable basis. Sometimes they have outright regional discrimination. Either way it amounts to the same thing. I go with Epoch whenever I can. Probably the best customer support too.
|
11-28-12 10:31am
|
Reply
109
|
Nude Fight Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from elephant:
(Capn's Reply)
Yeah I think some just want to cover all bases and end up doing a weak job of most of them. 21 Sextury though I do rate as being good at lots of niches though, not many network I could say that about.
|
11-27-12 08:13am
|
Reply
110
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from slutty:
(Capn's Reply)
Then folks like me that like it all would have to join three networks! There are always sites I don't have much interest on a given network (mostly the anal and gangbang ones), but that doesn't mean the network is setup poorly, I think they are just trying to attract a broad customer base.
There is a fair amount of soft and midcore material on their networks, although not as much recently, but Gloria is almost entirely softcore - although perhaps not as much stripping as you'd like.
|
11-26-12 11:25pm
|
Reply
111
|
Nude Fight Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(Capn's Reply)
Yeah it is a good part of the videos, slipped my mind to mention but yeah they rip each others clothes off literally which is rather nicely done in some scenes.
Yeah the rest of the network as a bit of everything, these solo sites, strong preference to anal hardcore, some great lesbian scenes in my opinion on lezcuties but mainly hardcore yes.
|
11-26-12 02:11pm
|
Reply
112
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Actually the only other time I was a member everything was straight forward and customer friendly, Cap'n. That's why I am so shocked over the change. Now it seems to be one large trap for the unweary.. It has become a stripped down version where you have to subscribe to extra sites to get the whole thing. Or at least that's how it looks from here.
As to refund, I've only done that once and was warned at the time that it might influence my approval by another site down the road, so I won't bother, especially since it only cost me $ 15.00. I downloaded a lot of cookie cutter material over the last three days, just so I wouldn't feel too cheated, but from now on the site will be anathema to me.
As you may guess I am not a great lover of Brazzers/Bangbros/Reality Kings/Naughty America anyway. Desperation has driven me there in the past and, sadly, most of their videos rest on my hard drive unviewed except for the first few minutes. I must make a thorough housecleaning one of these days soon.
This time around I was so awed by the wonderful picture quality of 1080p videos on my new TV that I thought I would give it another try. It will be my last one. There are other, better sites I haven't visited lately! :-)
|
11-24-12 10:19am
|
Reply
113
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from elephant:
(Capn's Reply)
Yeah I do tend to agree with you, there are lots of sites doing the softcore art nudes. I love certain sets of some of them and here is the odd amazing girl who really makes you think wow but lots of sets can get repetitive and bland and after a while you get bored of it all.
being unique I guess is harder but if you do come up with a new fresh take on nude photography then you will benefit and pick up a following.
|
11-23-12 01:37am
|
Reply
114
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(Capn's Reply)
I've never thought of that, but it makes sense. I prefer b-g hardcore and don't normally download g-g or softcore stuff so I guess I'd normally end up not being interested in a lot of stuff on a network. But that happens a lot anyway since both MILFs and big breasts are common so I lose out on those sites.
But the odd thing for me when it comes to Diesel Access is that I do download the girl-girl and solo softcore stuff because the models are just so stunning.
|
11-17-12 03:53pm
|
Reply
115
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I suspect that they're referring to scenes on the main site, Young Legal Porn. There are definitely anal scenes on YLP and I doubt that there are any on SSG. When I was a member Gloria hadn't even started doing girl-girl, though she is doing some now. In a reply to a question I aksed, dieselman responded and said that he highly doubted that Gloria would ever do boy-girl. But... if she ever changes her mind and does b-g anal I'll be running to get my credit card immediately.
|
11-17-12 02:38pm
|
Reply
116
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(Capn's Reply)
Oddly enough once inside the member's area it does have the appearance of a single site with all the models listed on one page and no further logging in required to access each model's content.
|
11-13-12 03:13pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from marcdc1:
(Capn's Reply)
I'm with Capn and the Buddhist on this one. When I like something I try to let the webmaster know - especially if they set up procedures to do it.
Most of the time I don't say anything. I've never complained to a webmaster - I don't get the feeling they would care (they in that sentence being the ones I need to complain to)
|
11-02-12 01:41pm
|
Reply
118
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(Capn's Reply)
The search engine results show slightly more indoor than outdoor shoots but its not far off a 50/50 split. More often than not the models are wearing something at the start of the set but generally its not a fully clothed striptease, might be just some items of lingerie or sometimes a dress with nothing underneath
|
11-01-12 02:05am
|
Reply
119
|
Donovan's Darlings
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from Cybertoad:
Look like a scary charging system. pay for set ??
|
10-29-12 11:00am
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
Very true, Capn! The owners of most picture sites are more respectful than that. Places like VideoBox and Videosz are appalling when it comes to their comments.
|
10-28-12 12:31pm
|
Reply
121
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from lk2fireone:
(Capn's Reply)
I completely agree with you. You want to know the age of the model at the time of the shoot.
The truth is, at a lot of sites, there is no attempt to be accurate about the model's age. They give the model's age as 18 or 19, even when many of the models are at least in their early 20s. Because they know the customers want the models to be teenagers, which means 18 or 19.
But Metart seems to be an exception to that rule. They do try to give the model's real age. But I believe it's just a software problem that they are giving the current age of the model on the bio sheet that is downloaded with each photoshoot.
On the Metart site itself, it clearly states that the age shown is the current age of the model (not the downloaded bio sheet, but the online bio sheet).
So it's just a software programming error.
Years ago, the age shown in the downloaded bio sheet was the approximate age of the model at the time of the shoot. But I don't know specifically, if they were giving the model's age at the time of the photo shoot, or the model's age at the time the photo shoot was posted to the Metart site.
|
10-28-12 08:03am
|
Reply
122
|
Donovan's Darlings
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
from tangub:
Hmmmm.....seems like they only drip feed you their content if you have a membership here. Under "What do I get if I join?" they say "45655 pin sharp pictures on rotation" and "6892 images online right now" It seems they also have a token purchase system which I presume is to encourage you to buy individual picture sets that are not currently online. I'm afraid this kind of set up would never persuade me to part with my money. If I want this kind of content I think I would go with your recommendation for Pin Up Wow in your reply to the Martha's Girls comment.
|
10-28-12 04:27am
|
Reply
123
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(Capn's Reply)
I only sent one email to Metart tech support about the current versus shooting photo age of the model.
I sent the email on Monday, early morning.
This is Saturday, evening.
No reply to the email. I figure it got lost in their spam filter.
The problem still appears in the bio text file that downloads with a photoset. It still gives the current age of the model. Not the age of the model at the time of the photoshoot, or when the photoshoot was posted to this site.
Just a bit of sloppiness. Annoying, but minor. Because they did list, and keep a record at Metart, of the age of the model with almost all photoshoots. But I don't know specifically if that age referred to the age of the model at the time the photoshoot was shot, or if it referred to the model's age at the time the photoshoot was posted to the Metart site.
|
10-27-12 05:40pm
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(Capn's Reply)
It's not only videos, Capn. The same sort of abuse is all too often found in the comments accompanying a picture set. I always come away from that feeling slimed and ashamed to be moving in the same circles as those louts. Thank God for PU where the models appear to be more respected. I have rarely (if ever?) seen abusive, misogynistic posts in the forum during the past five years.
Anyway, back to the poll: I wholeheartedly agree with the majority I despise the abusive name calling by site owners as they describe a video.
|
10-27-12 10:39am
|
Reply
125
|
Martha's Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Toadsith:
(Capn's Reply)
Pin-Up WOW does look pretty good, I'll add it to the list :-)
That said, Pin-Up WOW doesn't seem to feature all the post-production work that Martha's Girls had. It also seems to be focusing pretty strictly on emulating 1940s style pin-ups, while Martha's Girls recreated content from as early as the 1900s and as late as the 1970s.
|
10-27-12 10:31am
|
