| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Loki:
(tangub's Reply)
It's the risk with review sites. A particular reviewer may find content you love subpar or not appealing, so will review a site much lower than you would. That's the great thing about PU. We all have our own biases and opinions and that makes the reviews different and, in my opinion, a little more valuable than the reviews on The Best Porn.
|
10-07-19 09:37pm
|
Reply
52
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from Loki:
Maybe Satine took into account the incredibly expensive prices at In The Crack in their score?
I love this site, but it's gotten too expensive to join anymore.
|
10-05-19 04:00am
|
Reply
53
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from flashman21:
(tangub's Reply)
I forgot to mention, you can't even download her photosets! They don't offer full zips, if you want to download the stuff you paid for you have to do it one-by-one or use a script to run through every photo and save it.
She is hot, but after I paid that big price tag and didn't see any full nudity I started disliking her personally... "like why are you so prude, it's not cute anymore."
Not even being able to view 90% of the videos in Chrome and move to scenes I want to see and skip over the "teehee haha" stuff.... I could go on and on :P
I still can't believe I have to give up my phone number because they want to send me a text message to view the "Ultimate Collection" content for "verification", whatever that means.
|
10-02-19 12:22am
|
Reply
54
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from yujin:
(tangub's Reply)
Hey Tangub and everyone,
So there's been an update on our stance regarding reviews based on Adult Time channels (and similar content hosted on third-party sites).
Going forward, these reviews will not be admissible to the Weekly raffle based on the fact that they do not cover website and navigational issues (search functions, website layout, download speed, etc)
I hope that you all consider the reviews are written BY USERS FOR USERS. Keep it clear and transparent; we're all here because we don't want to waste money by paying for gimmicky site.
Cheers!
|
09-26-19 05:50am
|
Reply
55
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from mbaya:
(tangub's Reply)
I just asked Freddie if this is proper.
|
09-24-19 05:00pm
|
Reply
56
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from LKLK:
(tangub's Reply)
I believe my review makes clear that I was reviewing the Bare Maidens channel of the Adult Time network.
Please read the review again, if you think the review was unclear about what I was reviewing: the Bare Maiden channel of Adult Time, or the Bare Maiden site itself.
I stated the Bare Maiden channel on Adult Time currently has 9 videos.
While the Bare Maiden site itself has about 140 videos.
So the distinction should have been clear.
"The version of Bare Maidens that Adult Time offers is a slimmed down version of the actual site."
The Bare Maiden site is supposed to have 102,523 high resolution photos.
When you asked in a reply "So do you get access to the 102,000 Bare Maidens photos through the Adult Time membership then?"
I answered no. The Bare Maiden channel on Adult Time has a very limited photoset for each video, consisting of about 15 photos for each set.
So there shouldn't be any confusion: the Adult Time channel of Bare Maidens is a slimmed down version of the Bare Maidens site.
If you believe that is false or deceptive advertising, you can email the Adult Time network, and complain directly to them.
But I think that I made clear that my review is mainly about the Bare Maiden channel on the Adult Time network, although I do add facts about the Bare Maiden site.
Do you want to justify why you think my review is misleading?
Please point out where I stated facts or opinions that were misleading?
|
09-24-19 03:48pm
|
Reply
57
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from LKLK:
(tangub's Reply)
No.
The 102,000 photos are located on the original Bare Maidens site.
The Adult Time membership channel only has 15 photos for each video on the channel.
And the photos are not good quality: they can be very dark, so it's hard to see the model clearly.
It's more like a screen shot instead of a regular photo, for each photo.
Which is very disappointing.
|
09-24-19 10:55am
|
Reply
58
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from mbaya:
A very nicely written and very complete review. I see we ended up at virtually the same score for this site.
I wish you luck in this week's raffle.
|
06-21-19 01:47pm
|
Reply
59
|
Trike Patrol
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Shen:
(tangub's Reply)
I strongly disagree with you. Jimmy was not polite in his replies in virtually any capacity. There is a way to conduct feedback in a constructive manner. He told mbaya that "maybe he doesn't like Asians" and to not "pretend to be some objective observer just doing a public service". This is clearly condescending dialogue attempting to elicit a reaction. He asked whether exotics' review was a "late April Fool's joke"? How is he simply providing feedback and correcting misinformation? He is slipping in these types of comments in every other line. He also highlighted the score of exotics' review on multiple occasions as a "laughing stock". You say that mbaya was being pretentious when confronted about his error but you say that as if the webmaster was not pretentious in the first place. Two wrongs don't make a right though, so I will acknowledge that.
I understand that he is frustrated with the scores his site have received. No webmaster would react in rapture at all when greeted with such scores. He is also well within his rights to be unhappy should a reviewer get something factually wrong. It is his product and he is perfectly entitled to criticise. Yes, mbaya should have admitted when he said he does not frequent those tube sites. But the way the webmaster reacted is unacceptable in my opinion. He also went as far as to bring others from his site into the equation, which is against site rules.
I feel that the 99 score that came in some time ago was what pushed mbaya to do the review after a culmination of multiple reviews that seemed dubious and vague yet had very high scores. I do not feel it was a case of "discrediting" a specific review but to see if this site really is as good as all these reviews suggest.
Jimmy clearly dispensed with a constructive discussion and chose to opt for a points match, maybe a flame war. I'm not going to pretend that we were harmless in our discussion but for the most part the way we spoke did not warrant the level of malice the webmaster displayed. I know in my last reply that I gave in and it is a moment I am not proud of.
Just my two cents.
|
04-08-19 03:07pm
|
Reply
60
|
Trike Patrol
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(tangub's Reply)
I am not trying to wage a war here.
If that is how you see it, you are entitled to your own opinion.
I started off unbiased.
|
04-08-19 12:10pm
|
Reply
61
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from fb fanatic:
(tangub's Reply)
Thanks for the fine review tangub. Although the high plastic content is a disappointment to me, I do believe the photographer does a terrific job based upon some of the samples I've seen through the years. I have one question for you: does the site contain a bunch of content with the models either fully or partially clothed before getting naked.
I remember being a member of Femjoy a while back and being unhappy with the amount of "fully naked" right from the start of the shoot.
|
03-24-19 09:13am
|
Reply
62
|
Feti Style
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Not so strange.
The software engineer is probably related to the PU software engineer.
Hacks sticking together, is their motto.
|
03-20-19 02:36pm
|
Reply
63
|
Adult Time
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Loki:
(tangub's Reply)
tangub, yeah, I noticed this feature too. You go to the Adult Time site and the only thing on the page is a "become a member" link in a field of color. No tour or preview available. I had been wanting to join a lot of the subnetworks that comprise Adult Time for some time now, and when collected into one network, I didn't even hesitate.
The point still stands though that there currently is no tour or preview function on the site.
|
03-01-19 09:00am
|
Reply
64
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LadyLover:
(tangub's Reply)
Yes, the photos are available to download in a zip file, even if you are not a VIP member. But I have never downloaded a photo that big as a non-VIP member, so I'd assume that you need VIP to get those larger files. But they don't tell you how much bigger the photos and videos are, just that they are bigger. I haven't actually sprung for the VIP so can't say for sure what the payoff is there.
|
12-18-18 06:07pm
|
Reply
65
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(tangub's Reply)
Many thanks for the fast response.
Maybe I will get brave and download an earlier version of Firefox, and start using Down Them All again.
DTA was easy to use, and I was/am unhappy without it.
|
10-01-18 04:46pm
|
Reply
66
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review.
You write: "No problems using my download manager."
So: what is your browser (and is it the newest version, or an older version)?
And what is your download manager?
The name.
Is it free?
I used DownThemAll for many years, but it's not compatible with recent versions of Firefox.
I've used Firefox for many years. Maybe I should try another browser, but familiarity, ease of use, etc. keeps me with Firefox.
They have been working on an updated DownThemAll that will work with the new Firefox, but it's already been at least a couple of years they've been saying that.
And I don't want to run an older version of Firefox, because I'm afraid of viruses, malware, etc.
Even though I also run the Norton Security suite.
Thanks in advance.
My memory is poor. Did I already ask you this previously?
I seem to remember that you are running an older version of Firefox, and that's why you can use DownThemAll.
Or maybe it was some other PU member.
|
10-01-18 04:20pm
|
Reply
67
|
Fitting Room
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(tangub's Reply)
Thanks tangub, my fetishes have been influencing the sites I join. Panties was never a top fetish of mine but I do have the one of women sliding their panties over to masturbate and this site does that a lot. The panty content is a lot like the older Euro sites and I think the ages of the models (little older than regular teen porn) has them being more erotic with the way they tease. I originally thought it might be the same company that runs Fitness Rooms and thought maybe one day they would combine them but they don't seem to be related. After going through the content, I'll surprise myself by saying I think Caprice's scenes are the best I've seen of her and the best on the site. I stopped collecting her content several years ago because everything I watched of her was the same. She's matured a lot, is over being "cute" and she really does a good job at being erotic (eye contact, body language). For the best value, I would wait about 6 months, they'll be up to over 100 scenes by then.
|
09-12-18 01:16am
|
Reply
68
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(tangub's Reply)
This is incorrect - but I can see why you might see that because the first time I clicked on "latest videos" they were showing me stuff multiple years old - I knew that was incorrect so I went back & forth and finally got it to show me the real info - they had a 1 By Day solo set released on 8/01/18, another on 7/11/18, another on 6/20/18, etc.
So they still are releasing 1 By Day solo sets, but only 1 every few weeks - and nobody would be confusing them with MetArt or Femjoy sets - they're a lot more hardcore than that stuff, as they always have been to my knowledge.
|
08-08-18 07:04pm
|
Reply
69
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(tangub's Reply)
Thanks for the reply, tangub.
I was hoping for a site on the lines of MetArt, MPL Studios, Femjoy.
With attractive teen girls in glamour-style shoots.
But the 1 By Day site is, like you say, focusing on large-breasted girls and I much prefer the other glamour sites I mentioned.
Anyway, I'm cancelling my membership to DDF Network, since I was wasting my money on sites I did not use (I actually forgot I had a sub here until I saw it listed at a Vendo site I was using to cancel a different site sub).
|
08-07-18 11:11am
|
Reply
70
|
Panty Job
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(tangub's Reply)
Thanks for the informative response.
I really liked DTA, and have been waiting for a new version that will work with the current Firefox.
|
07-17-18 07:19pm
|
Reply
71
|
Panty Job
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from lk2fireone:
"No problems using my download manager (Firefox DTA)"
Is there a new version of Down Them All that works with the current version of Firefox?
My understanding is that DTA has not worked with the newer versions of Firefox for a while.
So:
Are you using the current version of Firefox, or an older version that allows DTA to work?
If DTA has released an updated version that works with the current version of Firefox, I would be glad to know.
|
07-16-18 08:12pm
|
Reply
72
|
Sperm Mania
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(tangub's Reply)
I just double checked. I see the biller as Vendo at 34.95. i would join if I saw the price that you do.
|
06-28-18 09:31am
|
Reply
73
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(tangub's Reply)
You caught me.
I must have been asleep when I was copying the review to the PU site.
And I deleted the con section of my original review, replacing it with the pro section.
Thanks for noting the error.
I have updated the review to fix that error: but the con section is not as complete as my original review, because I'm doing it from memory.
|
06-26-18 09:51am
|
Reply
74
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from LadyLover:
Thanks for the nice review. I was a member a few years ago and really liked the site and had been thinking about joining up again, so this is timely for me. One thing back then was they had some pretty strict download limits (per day, and also the number of files you could download at once). Did you encounter anything like that?
|
05-25-18 03:18pm
|
Reply
75
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from PinkPanther:
Excellent review - I've always thought this site's work was outstanding when I saw sample galleries here and there. Glad to see someone giving the site a comprehensive review.
|
05-21-18 05:16pm
|
