| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Khan:
(tangub's Reply)
If you look at the page explaining the point system ...
https://www.pornusers.com/profile_points.html
... you'll note there's a little more to it than just the word count.
If anyone is ever interested in how they can earn the maximum points from their submissions, feel free to drop me an email.
|
12-09-10 02:40pm
|
Reply
202
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Thedebilman666:
(tangub's Reply)
Thanks, what are these points you speak of?
|
12-09-10 01:34pm
|
Reply
203
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from lk2fireone:
(tangub's Reply)
There was a bit of luck in finding the connection to the Met-Art sets, but a good memory helps as well. I'm still impressed you found her Met-Art sets.
|
11-14-12 03:19am
|
Reply
204
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from lk2fireone:
Very nice review. Lots of details and great overall summary of the site. I especially like that you found the girl's names at other sites she's appeared at.
So I guess she's not 18 any more. And Ukrainian? Not a Texan? You are destroying my illusions about my porn stars. Haven't they heard about "truth in advertising"?
|
11-13-12 04:59pm
|
Reply
205
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from rearadmiral:
I love these solo teen sites but they can be such a disaster. The ones I've had membership to were likely created back when dial-up was common given how crappy they are. It's good to hear that some of the sites are now up to mid-2000s tecnology!
Great review!
|
11-13-12 04:50pm
|
Reply
206
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(tangub's Reply)
A strange one that!
Cap'n. :00
|
11-13-12 03:14pm
|
Reply
207
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from Capn:
Hmm Network of solo sites?
Why not make it one site featuring a variety of models?
That would make it more user friendly?
Cap'n :0/
|
11-13-12 02:59pm
|
Reply
208
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from LKLK:
Excellent review, covers the over-view and also a lot of fine details for the site.
You should post reviews more often.
They are worth reading.
Both for the ease of reading, and the fine details they include.
(By ease of reading, I mean the review is well-written, and a pleasure to read.)
Several months ago someone floated the idea of giving the best-written review of the month a special prize in the raffle.
That didn't happen.
But if there was such a prize, I would nominate this review.
|
08-02-20 04:21pm
|
Reply
209
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Tom D Admin:
(tangub's Reply)
I happened to find a working login, so I can confirm that LKLK is right about the update schedule - one or two a week. Though with the whole COVID thing, they're posting some classic content - like the Jana Cova video.
I did some quick math and it looks like there are 1,700+ videos, 3,800+ photo sets and about 2,100 models. So his estimates were a bit conservative, but better to be a bit under than way over. And he covered so much more in such precise detail!
Hope that helps? Happy Friday!
Tom
|
07-03-20 02:09pm
|
Reply
210
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LKLK:
(tangub's Reply)
SexArt $5.00 for 30 days.
RabbitsReviews shows that discount.
Since I'm a member of SexArt already, I can't tell if this is streaming only, or if it includes downloads.
(When I click on the offer hot link, I open a member page of the SexArt site, and not the offer site details--since I'm already a member.)
MetArt $5.00 for 30 days.
Same thing. I don't know if that includes downloads.
I'm a sucker for low-priced deals.
Except I'm already a member of both sites, so those deals don't interest me.
LOL.
|
07-03-20 09:43am
|
Reply
211
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LKLK:
(tangub's Reply)
I didn't do a numerical count of the photosets and videos.
I just took those numbers, and the number of models, from some page or other.
Too lazy to go through the hassle of viewing all the pages of their models and videos and trying to add them for a single count.
I figured that a general figure was enough to give an idea of the amount of the content.
My last join was a few years ago.
So I don't have specific knowledge of the exact content from a few years ago (my memory is not great).
My review basically paints a picture of a site that could have existed in the 1970, if the internet had existed back then. With photo sets and videos that are in the style of the 1970s (except the internet wasn't around then).
Does the site update? Yes.
You get 1 or 2 new videos per week.
Are all of the videos new?
The video of Jana Cova, posted Mar 4, 2020, and Jillian Janson, posted Mar 9, 2020, might be older videos, since I don't know if these models retired. I had assumed they retired, and these videos might have been shot years ago, but I'm not an expert on them.
Neither one of the videos I selected were up to the quality of many of the Digital Desire videos I've seen over the years: the videos lack the sharpness and color vibrancy of the standard Digital Desire videos, which were excellent and outstanding quality.
Actually, I much prefer the older videos of my favorite models, such as Kenze Thomas.
Those videos just make the models much more appealing. For me, at least.
The photo sets and videos have a posted date.
So I assume that they are posting new material, or at least material that has been updated.
I've only started my membership at the site, so I don't have a good over-view yet.
But so far, my impression is that I prefer the older content: there are so many beautiful girls, that were photographed so exquisitely. And the videos were softer. Not as much emphasis on the solo masturbation. More of a tease, although there was plenty of nudity.
But yes, they are updating with new models, in the photosets and videos.
But I prefer the older content on the site.
|
07-03-20 03:14am
|
Reply
212
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from lk2fireone:
It's a very nice site. Nice layout, great models.
I just joined today, after reading your comment.
One complaint: I want more sets of my favorite models. Why can't we ever be satisfied? Grrrrrrr.
|
09-22-12 04:05am
|
Reply
213
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from lk2fireone:
This isn't one of my favorite sites. But at this price, you made a sale.
Thanks for pointing out the promo price.
You can get the promo price by clicking on the PU/TBP link to the site, which gives some credit to PU/TBP as well.
|
09-22-12 02:56am
|
Reply
214
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from marcdc1:
Thanks for the find!
|
09-21-12 05:44pm
|
Reply
215
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(tangub's Reply)
Hi Tangtub, the point was ,
I did not find the discount at TB.
I guess obviously had I know that I would have put that LOL,
I happen to just type in Digital Desire Discount in the search and I found it not at TB., The advertising is so light at PU that I forget about the TB site at times. I feel kinda stupid not looking now that it was pointed out.
Next time I will check there, but no Tangtub I did not lose my mind
and not know where I found the discount LOLOL
|
05-01-12 12:30pm
|
Reply
216
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from Capn:
I may give it a whirl, but I know from your review there will be two things that will irritate me.
The lack of zips on smaller pic sizes & more importantly the mis-sequenced photos.
I know that one will really grate! :0/
An informative review. Thanks.
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-17-11 11:08pm
|
Reply
217
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from otoh:
Great review tangub - and you beat me to it, mine is impending too. I'll try to come up with a different angle on it!
|
08-07-11 09:23am
|
Reply
218
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from rearadmiral:
This looks like an interesting site. It's probably too artistic for my tastes, but I did check it out and like what I saw. Many of the models are very attractive. Thanks for the review.
|
08-07-11 08:16am
|
Reply
219
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from knightz:
(tangub's Reply)
I don't remember how long ago I was there but the highest resolution I got from DDG is 480x360.
I know what you mean about remastering of content. I am actually hoping I can get some of the the older ones in 720p, if the masters support a res that high. The 360p looks too grainy on a new HD monitor, so an upgrade in quality would make them watchable again.
|
05-19-11 01:41am
|
Reply
220
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LadyLover:
(tangub's Reply)
thanks - really enjoy all the quality reviews on here, so hope to contribute a little to the community as well.
|
03-16-17 07:12pm
|
Reply
221
|
Donny's Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(tangub's Reply)
Many thanks for the confirmation, tangub.
I suspected as much.
Cap'n. :0(
|
02-15-13 06:51am
|
Reply
222
|
Donovan's Darlings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(tangub's Reply)
I am afraid this is another area where there is little current content available. This is a shame as I think the concept does have legs if it is done properly with modern standards of quality & quantity.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-28-12 04:55am
|
Reply
223
|
Emily 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from graymane:
(tangub's Reply)
I appreciate your reply, tangub. And I can also appreciate your interest in the model (Emily).... She's very easy on the eyes.
And Let me say this: By chance, When I first ran across some of her work, I was hopelessly smitten. I mean, this sexy prodigy had a face blossoming with youth and a body to die for.
It's no news amounst the regulars here that I rarely join up to these pay sites anyway, (hence my low number of PU reviews) because for about a decade I've been a $10 a month running member of Skin Video -- a site that dishes out bits and pieces of just about anything mainstream porn delivers these days.
But I didn't want just bits and pieces of this gal ...I simply wanted all of her that I could get; and for some reason the usual sting I get divesting myself of funds extracted from my credit card for these renewal subscriptions was asleep at the wheel this time around.
My point, tangub: I wouldn't want to turn you off from experiencing the pleasure of a heart-pumping 30 day cyber-visit from Emily just because I'm trashing the site. You'll probably get a better reception, who knows?
BTW.... CCbilling is refunding me half of my outlay. that should speed up healing my wounds.
|
05-13-12 06:16am
|
Reply
224
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LKLK:
(tangub's Reply)
You are more efficient than me.
Which is one reason I admire your reviews.
Brevity, conciseness, clarity, are parts of why I think your reviews deserve a premium over average reviews, and you're not getting paid what your reviews should earn.
I suggested awarding outstanding reviews with a better prize in the past, but no action was taken on the idea.
Which is one reason I would willing to share part of any prize I win in the future.
Shen also submitted outstanding reviews.
But unfortunately his participation and reviews have been limited for a while.
I believe that outstanding contributions should be rewarded, to encourage active participation from some members.
That's my opinion, for what it's worth.
|
02-10-21 03:02am
|
Reply
225
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(tangub's Reply)
Before you finish congratulating me on a good spot I should mention that I had a Met Art membership a month ago and missed that connection there. D'oh!!! I'll have to keep my eye open for a discount on Met Art now... Thanks for the tip tangub.
|
02-16-12 05:32pm
|
