| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(tangub's Reply)
" I think most people had the impression that it was just the smaller inferior sister site of Met Art where they dumped the content that didn't make the grade to be showcased on Met Art. "
...but isn't that really essentially what it is?
Even if the site is wearing smarter clothes! :0S
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-26-12 03:17pm
|
Reply
227
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(tangub's Reply)
I thought as much.
Thanks for the additional information anyway!
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-10-11 09:00am
|
Reply
228
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from Capn:
Interesting review.
A shame about this regional pricing issue coming up again.
A very odd situation.
Why request regional pricing & then bypass it immediately someone complains?
I take it there is little in the way of stripping content?
It looks as if it is mainly nude, glam wear or lingerie?
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-10-11 07:12am
|
Reply
229
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
from lk2fireone:
As usual, a detailed, informative review. As well as having an easily readable style. Two thumbs up.
|
03-09-11 06:29am
|
Reply
230
|
Erotic Snap
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from elephant:
Thanks for this Tangub I'll add this one to list in the forum of sites like xart.
Looks ok but as new might be worth waiting till they have a good few more videos, I like to get my moneys worth.
Nubile Films from the same company as nubiles has just released a site now.
|
09-14-12 02:42am
|
Reply
231
|
Erotic Snap
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from otoh:
Aha, that's interesting - I had noticed this site too on TGPs but didn't realise they were doing hardcore/artcore/sensualcore/whateveryoucallit.
It looks tempting, but... I can't help feel I'd be much more drawn to these sites if they had a spread of models from 18-30. I suspect one reality is that by their mid-20s, some models have got tattoos and fake boobs, which don't really work in this style of content.
|
09-12-12 09:52am
|
Reply
232
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LKLK:
(tangub's Reply)
I agree my review is very long.
I put in a lot of extra information or thoughts about issues that were not usually covered in a site review.
The issue of copyright, for example.
I think it's misleading for MetArt to say if you buy the Staff Selection you own it.
You don't own it. MetArt owns it, even if you "buy" the selection.
Copyright infringement is not normally covered in a review, but it's more or less understood by the PU community.
Except that if you get caught up in a lawsuit, it can get very expensive.
PU members would probably not be as exposed to shaming as "straight" non-members.
But for the relatively few people who are targeted, it can be a serious issue.
Even if the target people did not consciously share porn illegally.
But I should make more of an effort to slim down my reviews, and make them conform more to the standard PU review.
|
09-25-20 11:09am
|
Reply
233
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from gregdd:
(tangub's Reply)
Good thing about technology is everything is getting better and more hi-res. The new videos are awesome, but you're always limited to the creativity and eroticism of both the models and the photographers. They too are improving due to the competition and exposure generated by the internet.
|
12-07-10 09:56am
|
Reply
234
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from graymane:
(tangub's Reply)
I'm not too much disappointed choosing the site as I am not getting what I expected. I have to blame myself for not doing more research, and should have stressed that more firmly in the review. It's indeed a beautiful site and seemingly lives up to it's reputation.
Thanks for your input.
|
10-22-10 01:15pm
|
Reply
235
|
Ersties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Amanda:
(tangub's Reply)
Hmm.. that's odd. We did have it posted for a limited-time! :)
|
09-06-17 11:17am
|
Reply
236
|
Ersties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(tangub's Reply)
Yeah it was, I would of been gutted if I didn't get one, streaming only is worthless to me as I'm a download only kinda guy really. Thanks anyway.
|
09-03-17 07:27am
|
Reply
237
|
Ersties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(tangub's Reply)
Yeah thanks Tangub. I found the link on Rabbits site, wish it was made clearer though this is in fact a trial for this price with no downloads at all. So to download I would have to wait a month and pay $35 on top of the $15 discounted price.
I had to really beg for a refund and luckily got one.
|
09-03-17 06:27am
|
Reply
238
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from otoh:
(tangub's Reply)
Concur with tangub - this was on my to-join list, there are a lot of models I like on there. But - assuming all set/videos were accessible to members before, I can't at all see the logic of increasing the price fourfold because the site has stopped updating!
|
03-19-12 02:21am
|
Reply
239
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from otoh:
Looks like an interesting addition to the genre - as you say, a bit sparse, so babes.com is likely to be my next heartcore join - but this is worth keeping an eye on.
|
02-28-13 04:58am
|
Reply
240
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Claypaws:
(tangub's Reply)
Thank you tangub. I enjoyed writing the review. Fortunately, the PU guidelines are pretty clear.
I am pleased that you are another solo girl photo enthusiast. I hope to add a few more reviews from the point of view of a collector of photos.
|
05-19-12 03:58am
|
Reply
241
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Patrik:
(tangub's Reply)
Nothing is more irritating than false information!
There is no one BMP file in EG!!!
This reviewer use an oldfashion system, and his own system convert our jpeg pictures into BMP!
So instead of writing that we made the stupid mistake to use BMP instead of jpeg, or instead of writing in a later answer that surely the server software is the cause of this, or that it is Windows fault, Skippy should look into the setting of his own system...
I do not understand how such persons can write reviews about Internet sites, when they even have no idea how their own computer is working, not to speak about web-sites or servers...
I do not understand also, when Skippy himself finally admitted that the mistake of appearing BMP files was 100% his own fault, why this point is still in the cons of our site!?
So Tangub, no fear, there is nothing to convert... all content is already in jpeg ;)
As for Google Chrome, after the answer of Skippy of the 04-08-2012, we performed several test - on modern computers ;) and all works fine!
Unfortunately this was again again disinformation from Skippy...
|
04-10-12 07:59am
|
Reply
242
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from PinkPanther:
It's there - .eu as others have said. It's a great site. I've been meaning to do a review for a while.
|
10-03-11 06:18pm
|
Reply
243
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(tangub's Reply)
yes, they use .eu
I've asked our editors to look into this one, btw
|
10-02-11 07:33am
|
Reply
244
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from elephant:
Site is still there, its the link again that pornusers use has expired
|
10-02-11 03:33am
|
Reply
245
|
Exploited Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bjorn7:
(tangub's Reply)
They got back to me yesterday about 20 hours after my attempt to contact them. I still can't access the the site though.
|
01-03-11 08:37am
|
Reply
246
|
Fake Hub
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Trump2020:
(tangub's Reply)
Yeah, I can't remember which site it was from but a couple years ago I cancelled via chat and it didn't get cancelled, and I was charged the recurring monthly bill. When we sign up I like getting those confirmation emails letting me know my biller and all my info. I also like getting those cancellation emails so that I have "proof" that I did in fact cancel, just in case they try to get slick. Epoch and ccbill, and perhaps vendo ive had good experiences with. But probiller makes me more and more uneasy. I dont like cancelling via chat, cuz basically all youre doing is trusting that somebody else will cancel for u, and of course we dont trust these guys eh lol. But yeah, some of these sites might be worth the risk of dealing with a somewhat shady and sly billing company if u want to. I know you said Twistys, but anybody who wants to try Fakehub its not a knock on them, just their biller. Im sure twistys is a good site, ive never been a member of them tho, so idk really.
|
12-19-20 06:32pm
|
Reply
247
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Noobs2:
(tangub's Reply)
Hi there. Just saw your comment and thought I'd reply as I am a current member at Femjoy.
In answer to your question you're correct in that Femjoy doesn't currently have an A-Z model listing feature. When searching by model you have three options: Sort by 'Recent', 'Views' or by 'Rating'.
Femjoy has an extensive catalogue of models/sets which is a plus. On the downside their site and its content needs work imho. Customer Service is sadly non-existent (noone replies). There are page errors ('500 Error') here and there - for example when you click on your 'Favorite Photo Sets' in the member area. Model ages when first shot are given in an idiosyncratic fashion - sometimes the cumulative age from when they first appeared (eg. first appeared in 2015 aged 20 - age listing of 25), sometimes '2020' (the actual year at the moment) and sometimes '0'!
Femjoy was taken over by Gamma Entertainment in 2019 and I get the feeling that the site is low on their list of priorities. It could definitely do with a facelift/coding work. I'll probably stay though on account of the models and their sets/videos on the site.
Cheers.
|
07-05-20 02:37am
|
Reply
248
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(tangub's Reply)
I've been a FemJoy member a few times, and they've done a lot to improve the site, but your suggestion is actually the next thing they need to do. 1200 pixels just doesn't cut it anymore, and 2000 would do it fine, along with larger option, which is most often 4000 px, though it can get up to 5500 px once in a while.
|
01-20-13 07:11am
|
Reply
249
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from nostromo:
(tangub's Reply)
Tangub wrote: "I recently went to join Querro where on the home page they advertise "sign up now for $19.95" but when i click on join from the UK the price changes to around $24...just a blatant con in my opinion so needless to say i didn't bother."
It happens a lot regrettably.
|
09-24-10 05:29am
|
Reply
250
|
Feti Style
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Not so strange.
The software engineer is probably related to the PU software engineer.
Hacks sticking together, is their motto.
|
03-20-19 02:36pm
|
