| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
POVD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from frank nasty:
(skippy's Reply)
So to answer my own question the newer videos are 1080p starting with the Kacey Lane scene. Like skippy says some of these videos still aren't great so far as quality goes, but others are. More recently all the videos have been high quality, still not the best quality by far but still a pretty good 1080p, so hopefully they have got it together now. Honestly only about 3 videos are not up to par since the 1080 switch. The updates are pretty consistent, about twice a week. I would have to say the strongest aspect of this site is the performers. There are some really hot ones here and it is definitely worth a look if you are a fan of pov. I am still not happy about them trying to fool people into thinking they were getting the highest quality 1080p videos when they were getting 720, or the blatant lack of consumer support. If they can keep it going like they have been I think they have a strong chance of becoming one of the best POV sites out there. Check it out.
|
09-03-14 01:17am
|
Reply
227
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from greg909:
One of the things that really annoys me about Femjoy is that the thumbnails they post to represent each set is VERY misleading. Many of the sets are poorly lit, not very sharp, have the wrong color balance, and the model is miles away from the camera. Yet the editors on Femjoy take the best shot in the set (there's usually only one that's any good) and crop it significantly to look like the model is much closer. Then they pump up the light levels (which they don't do for the photos themselves) and adjust the color to a more accurate balance. As a result, the set's thumbnail looks very inviting, but you're really disappointed when you see the set itself. Don't be misled by their Updates page -- the actual content is rarely like it.
|
09-01-14 05:09pm
|
Reply
228
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from Cybertoad:
Fantastic review, gees I am not huge softcore but you may have convinced me to join.
|
08-31-14 08:26am
|
Reply
229
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review. Sites like this aren't usually on my radar as I prefer hardcore, but I do occasionally subscribe to softcore sites like this and I always enjoy them. Thanks for providing the information that there are a lot of outdoor scenes and scenes where the video is shot at the same time as the photo shoot. I'm a big fan of both of those. I suspect that I'll check this site out based on your review.
|
08-30-14 03:15pm
|
Reply
230
|
Eternal Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from Khan:
I can't speak to discount offers you've seen elsewhere, but ...
Spot checking, I still show the special discounted price we list for this site.
Try clearing your cache and any cookies you have associated with the site and then revisiting directly from one of our links.
|
08-10-14 02:17pm
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(skippy's Reply)
ROFL, that was well-said.
|
08-10-14 11:02am
|
Reply
232
|
POVD
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from frank nasty:
So I have had mixed experiences with povD in the past. When I first joined in Jan 2014 It seemed very cool. I was very impressed with the shooting style. It seems like pov where mostly the entire female is visible on screen is quite rare. Idk why this is, just butt cheeks or boobs or just a face on screen by themselves is not appealing to me as a viewer... I digress...
The first 10 or so scenes are hot. Great performers, sets, shooting, and high quality video resolution. I was happy, I thought that I finally found a credible POV site that would update regularly.
now for the second month. I was very excited to see Janice G. there but I was quickly disappointed to find the video quality was horrible. Not offered in 1080p, only 720p and the pixelization was plentiful. I mean this was not even good 720p; it was not clear video, it was dark and the color was way off. I don't see how they can get away with saying "highest quality video on the net" and not even offer a quality 720p or 1080p, much less 4K (which most would argue to be the highest mainstream quality these days). It is clearly not the highest quality.
There was also the issue of an oversized watermark that covered 1/4 the screen which included the pussy, but at least that got taken care of, eventually.
I have also noticed that they have started "recycling" many of the girls now. D.Carter is in 4 different scenes and there aren't that many vids on the site yet ...not cool. I mean maybe if they had her in different costumes or something to switch it up I would say "its cool" ...but its not
This has been my experience on povD.com
My main question to you is are the videos looking better yet? I mean are they back to 1080p? and at what update/girl did the 1080 start back up on? Any 4K yet?
Are there any other POV sites you know of that offer the full body view I am looking for? I have checked out many and so far all I really liked are povd, P.north.com, & HW101. The latter 2 sites are good but hardly update. HW101 over at Naughty A. is def worth a look if u like this style and haven't seen it.
I be very happy if one of these sites could offer up an ebony babe in full body pov. If you know where I could get a scene like this let a bro know. I would greatly appreciate the heads up, and thank you for any info you may provide.
Good day & good fapping 2u.
|
07-28-14 02:36am
|
Reply
233
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from Monahan:
Thanks for a great review. The Babes site was one of the very first sites I joined and it was good (not great) at the time.
Your comparison, for example, to Met Art is perfect as a reason why Babes goes off my short term join list. I like the technical excellence of Met Art but I literally fell asleep watching one of their videos last year when I was still a member (boring video, but a sip of Glenlivit scotch contributed to my drowsiness. I don't think I've ever dozed off watching a porn video.
I've evaluated the "lifetime" deal and did the match as you did. Unless you stay a member of a site for an extended period it's not a deal by any stretch of the imagination.
|
06-14-14 05:46pm
|
Reply
234
|
POVD
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from host2626:
IIRC, all their videos have this fish lens distorted effect, like the ones in Spizoo's PornGoesPro. This "House of Mirrors" effect doesn't do it for me, zero excitement.
I understand that making proper POV is difficult. Even more so when you are a cheapass wanting to do it alone.
So either you do it with a normal lens, and convince your viewers who never had sex that it's exactly how it goes, you either see the closeup of her face or a closeup of your dick as if your eyes were popping out of your navel. The sad thing is that they believe it.
Or you use a fish eye lens to widen the field of view, thus completely distorting her body. Neither of this is exciting for me, and the proper way to do it, by having someone else hold the camera a bit higher that the guy's head, is almost never used.
It seems that mostly it's some guy wanting to get laid, have us pay for it, and make a living out of it. Understandable, I'd do the same :). Why pay a second guy to hold the camera, customers will swallow any crap. Some even think that it's normal to have camera shake, your pelvis is in motion after all and all that. No it's not, IRL your eyes are not fixed in their orbits, they move by themselves so your image is stable. There is no excuse for shaky cam, as there is none for any Hall of Mirror porn.
Anyway, /rant off, sorry. I wish my search for a proper POV site was over. Tired of having to content myself with 5 seconds of non-crappy footage in one video out of 10.
|
05-22-14 09:40pm
|
Reply
235
|
POVD
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review. I like the level of detail you provided and the rationale behind some of your comments. Reviews like this make PornUsers a valuable tool.
|
05-19-14 01:10pm
|
Reply
236
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from Monahan:
I agree with your point and will add another element.
I, as you, would go for the cost per day bargains of 1 year memberships. But when new (to me) sites showed up on PU I would sign up for one month with the idea of going for the 1 year deals if I liked the site.
That tendency created a serious overload where I had 3 sites at once with 1 year memberships and found that I was unable to take advantage of them all (the time aspect). In fact I discovered that I would access one of those sites only once or twice a month which negated the economic benefits altogether.
Nubiles, however, by their misguided pricing strategy, makes it easy to opt out of signing up for a full year.
These days I will go in steps; one month, three months (if it is cheaper on a daily rate basis) and, after seeing what my visit rate has been during the 3 month membership period, will decide that the annual membership makes sense.
|
04-27-14 11:22am
|
Reply
237
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Not my sort of thing, but very good descriptive review. Shame there are no videos.
|
12-02-13 09:42am
|
Reply
238
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from graymane:
A review this comprehensive deserves a favorable response.
It certainly cut through any resistance I might harbor.
Only fly in the ointment are the absence of videos.
But hey! I couldn't agree more; at ten bucks you can't go wrong.
Great review, skip. sorry I missed your previous ones.
|
11-30-13 09:54pm
|
Reply
239
|
CL Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from graymane:
Haven't seen you around before .... but having seen this well-written review, I'll be on the lookout for future ones.
Would Be nice to have you visit us in the forum .... we could use your talent.
Thumbs-up!
|
10-26-13 04:13pm
|
Reply
240
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(skippy's Reply)
Thanks for the clarification.
It was an empty day, so that is why I posted my comment/reply.
I do think that MetArt is a great site.
I never got a refund from them. But I was never double-billed from them, as far as I know.
Stay well.
|
09-20-13 02:48am
|
Reply
241
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I've been a member of MetArt many times in the past. I've also been a member of some of the newer sites in their network.
But I've never gotten a refund from them.
Maybe I should send an email complaining about how they seem to favor some members over others.
I've never even sent them an email to their customer service, that I can remember.
But I agree that MetArt is probably the best site for softcore erotic teen photos on the internet, considering their price, high quality of photosets and models, and massive content.
If there was some way they could improve their videos, I would give them a 100% score. But they seem to be trying to make their videos slightly more erotic.
|
09-19-13 10:17am
|
Reply
242
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
The offer and its details were posted at the PU site as a reply by the Webmaster to some comment.
The offer was not posted as news at the Diesel Access network, that I could find.
But if the offer does go into effect, that would be an inexpensive way of getting access to all of Diesel Access network and the two WOW sites.
|
03-05-13 03:53pm
|
Reply
243
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Read "What happened to the new membership network access" comment by elephant posted to 18 only girls site.
The webmaster stated in a reply several weeks back that there would be a new program giving access to Wow Girls and WOW PORN if you were a member of the Diesel Access network.
I don't recall the exact details.
But he stated in a reply to elephants comment above:
Reply date 2013-03-03
Webmaster Hey guys! Like always, it took a bit more time. The alpha version was not up to my expectations so I sent it back for improvements. I think, it will be released during this week, my best guess it will be Tuesday or Wednesday but again, something may go wrong!
Thank you for your interest!
|
03-05-13 03:38pm
|
Reply
244
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from RustyJ:
(skippy's Reply)
Just timeout and then you need to login again. Some sites seem to kick me out after as little as one hour.
|
02-22-13 09:19am
|
Reply
245
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Drooler:
(skippy's Reply)
Yeah, there's someone at MPL who does not take criticism very well. I've had an experience or two myself. It's still a great site. It's like eating at a restaurant that is as famous for its food as it is for the churlishness of the hospitality staff.
|
02-20-13 04:33pm
|
Reply
246
|
Katie Fey
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(skippy's Reply)
Ariel's awesome and there is TONS of material on her site. It's oddly organized - you'll find a lot of material under her blog, for instance. It's easy to miss things if you don't click around in all the nooks and crannies.
|
02-19-13 06:00pm
|
Reply
247
|
Katie Fey
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Comment from skippy:
Looks like I need to keep looking around. There is one bonus site that isn't bad called Ariel Rebel. Although I don't recall seeing the girl before, the solo site has Recent updates, decent vidos, etc.
|
02-18-13 08:55pm
|
Reply
248
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from gaypornolover:
Thorough review, this seems to be a popular site I'm always seeing it reviewed.
|
02-18-13 06:35pm
|
Reply
249
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
from otoh:
Great, in-depth review, with a lot of good points. You are selling it a bit short on the numbers though; a quick look at the list of sets shows > 700 sets; and don't forget the approx 500 videos.
If you go back a year ago, you'll also find they did experiment with some slightly more explicit stuff - see Emma/Emmanuella's sets (they also have quite a few late 20s models, of which she is one), where there is some masturbation, which worked well.
This was one of my favourite sites - I had a continuous membership for 2 years, but have recently stopped; partly because I have less time to spend on porn of late; but also, if I were to review it again now, I'd score it a bit lower than the very high score in my review, since:
* Updates are no longer daily - that's fine for the price of the site, but I'd need daily updates to subscribe for a year;
* The forum is gone - had some good chats on there with fellow members
* Most importantly - recent updates seem to be more studio-based; whereas what I love about the site is the voyeuristic nature of the locations - outdoor/bedroom/hotel/apartment etc
Oh and you are right it's a bit glitchy! It went through a couple of redesigns while I was a member, but never quite right.
But with all that, I'd still score it in the high 80s, especially for all the great archive material - and lots featuring models dressing and undressing from great lingerie and nylons.
|
02-18-13 09:36am
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from jberryl69:
(skippy's Reply)
Mine is a physical tingling the progresses in waves up my body.
|
02-17-13 02:36pm
|
