| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Congrats on a great review. Even though this site isn't my thing I can tell you took a lot of time and care to put this together.
|
01-26-13 06:33pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from cp4men:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
HI Many thanks-even the smallest bit of advertising helps
All the best!
|
01-23-13 02:52pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from graymane:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Sorry 'bout the absent "cock option", Gaypornolover.
Lesson learned!
But should it be of any comfort to our highly valued Gay friends out there, the same can be said effecting all our straight viewers.
To wit ....
Upon close observation, one will notice the choice spelled
p-u-s-s-y wasn't optional to them, as well.
|
01-17-13 04:03pm
|
Reply
54
|
Boynapped
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Ambition:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thank you for your kind words! I'm glad you appreciate my review. I was so happy to see they got rid of DRM. Their content was always very hot, but I never understood, why they use DRM. People who pay to see their content receive limitations while those who pirate their porn can view it DRM-free. The site seems to be part of the GayLifeNetwork now, at least the downloads are hosted there. They seem to improve constantly. JizzAddiction just got added to their bonus content, that's the first bonus worth watching so far.
|
01-16-13 03:32pm
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Cybertoad:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I agree with GP, I like it but when it seems like they really did not want to I think it shows in their acting and in turn makes for bad porn.
|
12-26-12 08:22am
|
Reply
56
|
Dominated Men.net
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Khan:
Ok, I've asked them to do a new screenshot. Should be changed out w/in a few days.
As far as the site facts ...
Since we don't currently have a log in to the site, I'm not sure when they'll be able to update those. If you see something significantly wrong you're welcome to submit an error report.
We'll look forward to seeing your review.
|
12-20-12 07:12am
|
Reply
57
|
Best Hard Hunks
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from hodayathink:
Well, technically, since you aren't paying, they're not giving you bad customer service for your money.
But I do agree about there being a large amount of websites out there that need better previews.
|
12-17-12 05:10pm
|
Reply
58
|
She's A Freak
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I agree in general I stay away from site that have poor preview pages. I'm not looking for you to give away the farm - I just want to know if what you have is what I want.
If you have confidence in your product it should make me want more.
|
12-16-12 07:02am
|
Reply
59
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Marcus:
I agree, I find the name borderline repulsive! It's like it's come from some random word generator where it pairs a type of animal with a bodily function.
|
12-11-12 01:44pm
|
Reply
60
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from pat362:
I never asked them but I know that it`s not something they came up with recently because they have had this name for many many years.
I`m not sure which came first. The studio shooting content only for the VHS/DVD market or the the one shooting content for internet/dvd.
|
12-09-12 09:58am
|
Reply
61
|
Male Strippers Unlimited
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from Capn:
To me, I'm afraid it smacks of laziness & lack of webskills & care.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-09-12 07:27am
|
Reply
62
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Capn:
I really don't think it appears to matter to them. As long as they have a memorable name, pleasant or otherwise, they are happy with that.
ALS Scan was mentioned by RA.
The 'scan' part of the name, for me, harks back to the 1990's when a lot of porn was scanned in. Time to move on from that name IMO as it would infer very old content.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-09-12 07:12am
|
Reply
63
|
Male Strippers Unlimited
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Review
from rearadmiral:
Excellent review, as always. You know you're dealing with a weird site when they actually apologize for the fact that they make it difficult to download photos and that many of the vidoes are crap.
|
12-09-12 07:02am
|
Reply
64
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I agree with you. I have no idea why they'd choose such a name. I also think that the guys at Diesel need a better name than Skinny Super Girl because 'skinny' is a derogative word and Gloria deserves nothing deroratory. Likewise with "ALS Scan." Yes, it probably made sense when they named the site "All Ladies Shaved" way back when, but if I ever hear the phrase "ALS Scan" in real life I won't treat it as a good thing.
|
12-08-12 08:29pm
|
Reply
65
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Absolutely agree with you. It's a hideous name for a porn site. A real turn off.
|
12-08-12 07:25pm
|
Reply
66
|
Smelly Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from tetros:
LMAO, this can't be true, crazy world
|
12-07-12 07:53pm
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from marcdc1:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
I agree. I grab some pix (and then hardly look back at them). For me it's almost always videos.
|
12-05-12 05:42pm
|
Reply
68
|
Smelly Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from otoh:
I noticed this one too... and - purely out of morbid interest (er, dicks are not really my thing, clean or smelly) clicked through to the site. Not recommended - although perhaps amusing for Red Dwarf fans...
|
12-05-12 05:28pm
|
Reply
69
|
Smelly Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from rearadmiral:
Ewwwww... This is definitely high on the 'weird' list...
|
12-05-12 01:17pm
|
Reply
70
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Ergo Proxy:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
If he didn't pay Clips4Sale directly he has a problem. Once I bought a clip which was extremely crappy and got my money back, but this was a regular clip...
|
11-30-12 03:17pm
|
Reply
71
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from hodayathink:
As far as I know (and I know a couple people that have paid for videos), they are trustworthy with your info.
As for the prices, this is what videos cost if you want something specific that isn't necessarily "mainstream".
|
11-28-12 06:52pm
|
Reply
72
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
from pat362:
I've never actually heard any horror stories about this site but I would still never use it's services because I find that their prices are offensively expensive.
|
11-28-12 06:23pm
|
Reply
73
|
Mandy Flores
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from roberbear:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Thanks dude. There are a few other sites that I will review as they were great. Still in shock (lol) how bad mandyflores.com is!
|
11-25-12 04:00am
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Monahan:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
gaypornlover, "I can only assume the major studios will relocate and some of the smaller ones will ignore the law - I mean how can you prove where a movie was filmed really?"
The proposition calls for all porn production companies to notify a new bureaucracy whenever they start a production so that the bureau can send an inspector* to the site. Failure to do so will result in serious penalties.
Because this was a ballot proposition and not a city ordinance, it cannot be ignored, but if they choose to, the producers can take the proposition through a court process which will delay implementation at worst, and possibly cause the law to be thrown out..
My guess is that the serious economic consequences to the City will result in a future proposition reversing this one. Soon. (The porn industry is located in the San Fernando Valley which is part of the City of LA. There are small towns and unincorporated areas that are not part of the proposition spotted throughout the city but none of them are near Chatsworth or Canoga Park where most of the big producers are located.
* This would be my kinda job!
|
11-22-12 09:17am
|
Reply
75
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Omne35:
(gaypornolover's Reply)
Hi, thanks for the kind words.
The cum shots are easy to notice once you look for them. They show the sex up to a certain point, then they cut to the guy's face going through all kinds of contortions, then they cut back to the main event and there's semen all over but nothing actually coming out. Let's be realistic, they're not going to film the guys face and miss an actual cum shot going on. Some of the expressions bring to mind a neurological problem, not intense passion.
Other times they cut directly from the sex to a shot with everything done, same issue, why would they not film it?
They get pretty elaborate sometimes having the girl mouth some stuff then drool it out, at other times it's just saliva. Some of the women are better at it than others. If you look close you can sometimes notice that the guy has something in their hand while they're stroking and it flies around.
Since it looks like they film several videos a day using the same guys I can understand that they aren't normally going to be able to cum 8 times in a day. When you see a lot of the videos in a row, such as when you're downloading in bulk, you can see the sets are the same as far as movable items like flower arrangements and clothing.
However, I'd rather they just skipped the weird facial expressions and ended it.
|
11-21-12 04:49pm
|
