| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
from abbywinters:
Unfortunately, Maddison Yong and us did have some problems when she came to shoot with us.
Maddison's report above is accurate, though does miss out some aspects (She had several grooming issues, including a rash, an allergic reaction to sometimes). We engage models well before their shoot date to discuss how seriously we take grooming matters (several emails, and several phone calls), and make it very clear that we will not proceed with the shoot if they do not meet the standards our customers require and expect.
We do this, because we do not allow models to wear makeup (our customers tell us again and again, they want no makeup), and we never photoshop images (to remove blemishes). Ms Young alluded that in her previous work with other companies, makeup and post-production work had solved these problems, and she was mystified as to why we could not use the same tools. We explained that this was one of our selling points, but she was not satisified with that.
We prefer to simply wait until the model is looking her best. Most of our models appreciate this, and let us know in advance if they have any issues (for example, by texting us the night before, or emailing pictues of the affected area from their phone).
Unfortunately, Ms Young had a pressing schedule, and was unable to wait a few days for the blemishes to go away.
In our emails to her, we apologised for our harsh rules, reminded her that we did make this very clear that it was a condition of working with us, complimented her on the excellent shoots she did do for us, and invited her to return to do more shoots at her convenience. That invitation is still open.
We have shot around 1500 models over the last 12 years, and never had a model so upset about our grooming requirements as Ms Young was. We reviewed our procedures in several meetings afterwards, to idnentify where we "went wrong", with a view to improving our processes, and identified that we made every reasonable effort to communicate clearly.
At the end, we resolved that we just "rubbed eachother the wrong way".
|
07-10-12 01:11am
|
Reply
2
|
Action Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(cjd2004's Reply)
Yeah, and it looks like they added some original material on Feb 13 & Feb 15 - then decided they were tired and needed a nap and haven't updated again since then. On their last legs, that's for sure!
|
02-27-13 10:24pm
|
Reply
3
|
Alison Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(cjd2004's Reply)
Thanks for the reply. I couldn't get your wayback link to work at first until I changed the https to http, anyway it seems to confirm that they are posting old content masquerading as recent updates. Comparing the number of covers in the old tour to the latest one I would guess they've removed something like 50 sets from the site to rotate as new updates which makes me even less likely to join than if they were being honest and simply leaving the entire collection online available to download in a membership.
|
02-27-13 03:18am
|
Reply
4
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(cjd2004's Reply)
Thanks! It looks like I'll be taking a trial membership this weekend to get some of the photos sets I wanted.
|
02-12-14 05:15pm
|
Reply
5
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from timeac1:
(cjd2004's Reply)
Yes that too...
At least the only want the number not the expiry date or CID number.
It is sad a site with decient content would resort to crap like that and what I complained about.
|
02-01-13 09:19pm
|
Reply
6
|
Dorcel Vision
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
from dorcel:
Hello,
You can write to support@dorcelclub.com and I will be able to help you for dorcelvision.com / dorcelclub.com
All the best,
|
01-12-16 03:41am
|
Reply
7
|
Dorcel Vision
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi cjd2004!
If you drop an email to MikeC (michael@rabbitsreviews.com ), we can try to help you out with this issue. :)
|
01-04-16 05:30am
|
Reply
8
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(cjd2004's Reply)
You're right. I wasn't aware of it, or didn't think of it. And they do call it the MetArt Network of sites.
Thanks for the correction.
And if I hadn't already given you a positive trust rating, I would give you one now!
|
11-28-12 04:43am
|
Reply
9
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Drooler:
(cjd2004's Reply)
Why, yes! Funny, I hadn't noticed the connection. Well, it isn't as though they've cornered the "joy" market. ;) Thanks for pointing that out.
|
01-25-13 05:00pm
|
Reply
10
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from CaloNord:
(cjd2004's Reply)
was refering to the review :P
|
06-15-15 12:09pm
|
Reply
11
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from CaloNord:
(cjd2004's Reply)
download speeds are fine
|
06-14-15 09:27am
|
Reply
12
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Addict:
(cjd2004's Reply)
They now have mp4 downloads as well. Unfortunately I think download manager issue remains.
|
09-17-13 12:52am
|
Reply
13
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from exotics4me:
(cjd2004's Reply)
I'm not for sure on that one. But it's the point I was making. If he's going to just have one update per week, what does it hurt him to post the high superpics of every set instead of the 1600 high end ones? Would it really hurt his profits to offer past members a slightly lower price knowing he only updates once per week and there wouldn't be much new for them to download? As it is, I'm bumping it back to joining maybe once every two years. I do know the webmaster can be a jerk. If you haven't seen that look up how he talked about Eufrat and complained about her "poor English" knowing good and well when he hired her she wasn't a native English speaker. He went as far as leasing that set to other sites and went on a rant about how he would never hire another Euro model, seems like he called them "fake, plastic, robotic". His comments on Danni Yeager's sets were also bad. He blames the models when the sets don't go how he thinks they should go.
|
12-10-12 03:27pm
|
Reply
14
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(cjd2004's Reply)
Some photosets at Erotic Beauty do have the metadata "date taken", other photosets do not.
The Avril photoset does not have the "date taken" metadata.
The same thing for Metart. Some photosets have the metadata "date taken", others do not.
It would be nice if more of these photos had that information.
|
02-12-13 07:28am
|
Reply
15
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Really pays to read the fine print.
$US99.95 every 30 days after the initial period!
Either that is a mis-print (pricing error), or a scam to trap the unwary.
I wonder how many people will be caught by this?
I've always thought Hegre was a major site, ethical.
If I was stupid enough to pay S99.95/month on re-bills, I'd never join this site again.
|
11-27-14 01:47am
|
Reply
16
|
Hidden Zone
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from David19:
(cjd2004's Reply)
Interesting. As I noted in my review, it is always possible that this material is staged, but if so, they've definitely done a great job in making it appear real--much better than most similar sites.
Most sites do contain a generic 2257 disclaimer to try to keep the US authorities satisfied. You'll notice that usually--and this site is no exception--they are not exactly encouraging of efforts to actually obtain the 2257 records. Usually to actually get the records they claim to have, you need to write--snail mail only--to some address in a foreign country where it is presumably difficult and slow to enforce US law.
I'm not saying for sure that the material is real as opposed to staged. It is just it is often difficult to know what these 2257 disclaimers really mean. 2257 disclaimers are there for the sole purpose of legal protection, not to disseminate any real info about what the site is all about.
|
04-15-14 08:58am
|
Reply
17
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
from Drooler:
Holly Randall has good content, but for me it hasn't had the same draw as MetArt. Hopefully, this affiliation will give the Holly Randall content a boost. Two things would help in the process. One is to make sure that the HR site (or sites) are as web-friendly as the MetArt sites are. Just look at the difference between them. MetArt has a nice, subdued visual approach, whereas the Holly Randall site is garish and cluttered. They clearly speak in two very different visual languages.
The second is to make the approach to the photography, especially the types of poses, more consistently like MetArt's as well.
|
01-26-13 04:00pm
|
Reply
18
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
from KET924aab:
Thanks for the link cjd. Holly Randall is definitely something different for Met-Art. It will be interesting to see how they redesign the site. Did you also see they are now managing ALS Scan and Viv Thomas? I had never heard of xbiz.com--very cool site.
|
01-25-13 05:27pm
|
Reply
19
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I'm currently a member of Metart. Years ago it was just Metart and Metmodels. I knew they had added a few other sites recently, but didn't realize how many they have added. I hope it increases the financial stability of the Metart site itself, which is my favorite site for softcore photography. A lot of sites fall on hard times, and either go out of business or become archive sites that no longer update.
And now, Metart is not just a mega-site by itself, but is becoming a mega-network.
|
01-25-13 07:41am
|
Reply
20
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
from otoh:
Interesting news indeed! I've been a member of her site before, and whereas it's more glam-porn-y than my usual taste, I do have a fondness for it. Seems Met Art are definitely branching out into more racy material... which can only be a good thing IMHO, given the banality (purely subjective!) of the main site.
|
01-25-13 06:29am
|
Reply
21
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from otoh:
(cjd2004's Reply)
Unfortunately I'm so into teens; ideally I like girls in maybe mid-20s or more. But still, a good site and worth considering - thanks for the tip!
|
10-08-11 12:39am
|
Reply
22
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Yosemite:
(cjd2004's Reply)
It's been so long ago that I changed my email address it seems that they've changed the feature that I used. It's a little easier now but my curiosity got the best of me and I used the "chat" feature to find out how it is done now.
You can use several avenues to make the change but I would recommend using the "chat" or "Live Help" button in the top right of the Home page. The "chat" feature is available 24/7 as is their help contact phone number which is 1-800-345-6684.
Whichever feature you use you will need the following information to make the change:
1. Your current Vod.com registered email address.
2. Your complete name and address.
3. The last 4 digits and expiration date of your credit card or last 4 digits of your checking account and bank routing number, whichever you used to purchase your minutes.
4. The new email address you wish to use as your new logon information.
Hope this solves your problem.
|
10-26-14 10:52pm
|
Reply
23
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Comment
from Yosemite:
I changed my email on Hot Movies/Classic VOD with no problems. In fact, it was the least of my problems. LOL!
|
10-23-14 12:55pm
|
Reply
24
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from humiliatrix:
(cjd2004's Reply)
Guess who loves Humiliatrix? Sissies. I know, crazy.
Lol seriously I told my twitter followers I had a sissy mission for them, and posting some new reviews here was one of their tasks.
https://twitter.com/humiliatrix/status/218390172608376832
|
07-01-12 09:19am
|
Reply
25
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(cjd2004's Reply)
Yeah, but in fairness to these guys if Tanner Mayes had a site and told me to review it, that would be the first score of 200 ever awarded on PU.
Seriously though, there might be some bias in these reviews...
|
06-29-12 08:23pm
|
