| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Graphis
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from jd1961:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
I can't remember if the videos are offered in different sizes.
|
11-14-09 11:32am
|
Reply
77
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from OneMan:
The submissive, almost ashamed attitude shown by japanese girls, is actually quite realistic and natural. You will not find many vids where they are laughing and joking, and even fewer where they take control.
A few sites do appear to be cropping up where many of the vids are very different - such as the one I mention above which I am probably going to take a look at. There, some are starting to show girls that are a lot less submissive and you don't get the feeling that they are being raped. In fact, some even shave their pubic hair, which is lmost unheard of in japanese girls, presumably, acting like a security blanket.
So, to be honest, the feeling you get form those videos, is not the girls faking or acting....quite the opposite in fact.
|
10-23-09 02:32pm
|
Reply
78
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from alexmedia:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Oh, thank you for your comment, probably I have to check it again :)
|
10-01-09 07:24pm
|
Reply
79
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
I think I read somewhere that addition is a little easier than subtraction. Maybe the site should play to its own strengths. ;)
Thanks for the tips on the blur outs. Japanese porn can feature all kinds of perversions, but pubic hair is a big no-no. Heard quite a few years ago that they hire people to scratch out pubes with a razor on magazines like Playboy before they can be sold.
|
09-24-09 08:03am
|
Reply
80
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Drooler:
I can only wonder myself about this. If you signed up with them through Epoch, then it might not be anything other than a glitch.
I signed up with a Japanese-based site called BlondStars, and it would do the kinds of things you described, or worse. Anyway, it kept re-demanding the fucking login. I describe the experience at the thread Sites Not Listed .... BTW, the billing company was SegPay; never had this particular problem before with sites they bill for.
So is it a quirk that happens sometimes with sites based in Japan? I can't be sure, but I do wonder.
|
09-24-09 03:15am
|
Reply
81
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mbaya:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
I can see that I did not make my point clear. Tease is a feeling of anticipation that increases as you watch the video. My complaint is that it is too long on useless slow moving filler. Nearly a half hour to finally get to topless is not tease, it is boring. That is basically how I feel about the gynecological overload. I expect some, as advertised, but they overdo it to the point of my losing interest.
I would not like music either, but the videos nearly always have no sound at all. Combined with a lot of visual filler, that is not so great.
I think we are in basic agreement here.
|
09-15-15 06:24pm
|
Reply
82
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from mbaya:
I love this site and think it is one of the best. I wrote a review six years ago and gave it an 85, but I think that now I would go to 95. It is so huge and the models, camera work and just overall class set it apart from any competition.
That being said, it has some flaws. It is too serious and slow paced. The videos seem to miss tease for example. After twenty minutes of slow motion stripping, you get about two minutes of interesting action.
Where is the sense of fun, or of not knowing what to expect next? There is not much buildup. When you get visuals of the models best parts, you get them in spades, but twenty minutes or a half hour is a bit of an overload, even clinical. This can get to be too much of a class in gynecology.
I think that your point is basically the same as what I just said, just stated differently.
|
09-15-15 05:46am
|
Reply
83
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from williamj:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
2.20MB/Sec average for the 1920X1080 files that are 15 min or longer. 2-3 min max. If your getting slower,and I'm no expert, its your Comcast connection or your computer. But this site fly's for me all the time.
|
02-07-10 06:01pm
|
Reply
84
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from williamj:
I just downloaded a 33:45 min video at 2.20MB/Sec 640/480 wmv in 4 min. I think thats fast for Comcast?
|
01-27-10 07:27pm
|
Reply
85
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from RagingBuddhist:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
That's good to know - I'll remember to do that next time I go to the site. Thanks for the reply.
|
01-12-10 03:21pm
|
Reply
86
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
WWW-
If you think AVG is part of the problem, have you tried turning it off while you're downloading? AVG might've been the problem here, too. Try disabling it, then hit the site with a download manager. I'm now curious to know what your results would be.
|
01-12-10 06:26am
|
Reply
87
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I just joined for my first time and like williamj, I'm getting very fast download speeds. I'm a Comcast.net customer and Comcast must have something that controls download speeds because 525 kb/sec is as fast as I can go - the downloads from In The Crack start at approx 670 kb/sec and get reined in back to that max speed - and stay there - they don't decrease or slow down unless I'm doing multiple downloads from various sites.
|
01-11-10 10:04pm
|
Reply
88
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from williamj:
I'm currently a memeber and the downloads are flying. 2.0k or faster for the past two months. Even the 15 minute to 25 minute clips download with great speed. I downloaded 5 different girls in about 30 minutes. Hate to say it but I don't think its the site.
|
01-11-10 04:52am
|
Reply
89
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from turboshaft:
Good review. I am thinking of rejoining soon to "catch up" on their previous material. You'd think they were founded by a bunch of horny doctors in the way they capture female anatomy, but it's still interesting and entertaining for closeup porn.
|
07-28-08 03:04pm
|
Reply
90
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from Drooler:
After some time away, I decided to take another -- well, you can guess -- at this site.
Nice that they're finally on an every-other-day schedule, which started July 16th. But of the 74 pics of Lepidoptera (today), there were only 4 that did anything even remotely "crackworthy." Most of it looked like something you could find at OnlyCuties: pussy + toys = the Universe.
Hoping this is just one little slip and that the site will stay focused on its mission.
|
07-20-08 04:41am
|
Reply
91
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Drooler:
First, I'll note the improvements: full access to everything (what a change!), overall improvement in image quality, and an upcoming doubling of updates (to every other day) starting July 16th.
But as you note, the angles leave much to be desired. This is true with the pics as well. The site is really stuck in a mode. Another vexing consistency is, when the girl is shot from the back, it's either full body head-to-toe or just the ass in the frame. There are very few top-of-head to upper-thigh framed pics, which you can often get at lots of other sites. And the girl usually faces away so that you can't even see her face! The fairly recent Betty Saint pics are that way, for instance.
At least with the recent Jane F on the couch, she's looking back at the camera, but again it's either ass only or fully head to toe.
I've downloaded and tossed vids that have too much of the odd angles. Anyway, I hope the webmaster is reading this and takes into consideration what I'm saying.
|
07-05-08 10:52am
|
Reply
92
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Goldfish:
I watched some of the free demo clips and I see what you mean. I wouldn't mind some of the shifting angle thing but for most of the scene I'd hope the picture would be stable and upright.
|
07-05-08 07:51am
|
Reply
93
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Oh, wow. You are in for something else. I mean, with the 22" monitor. Jaysis.
|
03-06-08 05:53pm
|
Reply
94
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
So it is a matter of doing the '90's style 'Pick & Sort' then?
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-18-10 03:54pm
|
Reply
95
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
I am not sure how I missed this review of yours.
From what I have seen from the review & the tour I think I will really like it.
Plenty of fully clothed photosets going to full nude, I take it?
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-17-10 03:32pm
|
Reply
96
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Hey WWW
Not problems at all - BTW: I was a bit pissed at some other japanese-site - kind of the same - when I wrote that first thing...
And yes: Peace and big Cheers!!!
|
01-11-10 07:04am
|
Reply
97
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
WWW - please see my update - it's NOT a question about your - btw fine - review...
|
01-09-10 07:38am
|
Reply
98
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review from WeeWillyWinky:
I neglected to mention: there are many uncensored hardcore vids up for offer here, 15 pages, 12 vids per page, average length seems to be about an hour and a half. Also, the Urabon archive is uncensored.
|
11-14-09 09:06pm
|
Reply
99
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from jd1961:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
thanks to Khan, I had no idea this was listed.
@Wee Willy,
Before you join Graphis, let me warn you that although the price seems reasonable, it's one of those sites that keeps material hidden unless you allow your subscription to be renewed. Each month, they reveal a little more. I didn't appreciate it, and left after a month. It is premium quality material though.
|
11-08-09 03:13am
|
Reply
100
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from jd1961:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
There is a very good softcore site out of Japan (that's not listed here), it's a bit expensive though. Real great photos and videos.
http://www.graphis.ne.jp/guide_en.html
|
11-05-09 10:58pm
|
