| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
And there's another one: Daisy Beach. They have 3 pic sizes up to 3000px and a lot of panty/almost-nude. Personally, I hated it for this reason, but you might like it. It's never been reviewed so far.
|
12-20-07 04:15am
|
Reply
52
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from Drooler:
Since you like girls in panties, you ought to check out nextdoor-models (put w's in front, .com at end). I've been there a couple of times myself and the pics are at 1800px. Thing is, I prefer nudity, and there wasn't that much -- though a small percentage of the galleries, especially of Riley Shy and Amy Reid, got hot and naked.
|
12-20-07 01:43am
|
Reply
53
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ace of aces:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
thanks a lot for youre indeed specific answer. i think i won`t try that site mainly because of the non exclusive point
|
12-13-07 04:07am
|
Reply
54
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from ace of aces:
do you know if they have softcore content? (mastrubating etc. or only teasing?)
|
12-12-07 04:07am
|
Reply
55
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from ace of aces:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
as far as i can remember are all of the sites in that one by day site.i was a member of the busty site and also of hands on hardcore e.g. i saw rather every video of that site at the one by day site and thought, what a waste of money. would be interesting to know if that is still the same businessplan of them ^^
|
01-20-09 11:39pm
|
Reply
56
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from ace of aces:
aren`t all of the videos of that site on onebyday also?
|
01-20-09 04:53am
|
Reply
57
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from Monahan:
Three questions.
1. Does the site tend toward real versus aftermarket enhancements or vice versa? (I's rather see mammaries move naturally than look like pneumatic rubber bolted on to the babe's chest or ridiculously oversized.
2. Their price is very high (higher than my normal limit of $25 per month and even higher than my maximum acceptable price of $30 per month) so my question is, is the site worth the money? If so, and the quantity of content is as large aa it appears it is, I could be persuaded to cough up their 3 month price of $75.
3. Is there a network involved, and/or are there other "bonus sites," that might persuade me?
|
01-19-09 06:04pm
|
Reply
58
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Monahan:
Music is OK, but only if the model is dancing to the music. Otherwise the natural sounds, such as the slurping sounds emanating from a model's pussy as she's masturbating, do it for me.
I also get annoyed with excessive grunting and groaning when it's clearly not genuine.
In hardcore stuff sometimes music is good just to cover over the lame chatter and phony ecstatic noises coming out of the two coital practitioners.
|
01-01-09 10:40am
|
Reply
59
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Digital Desire seems to use "mood setting" music that actually is not bad. I usually watch my porn in mute anyway because a lot of music is terribly cheesy and ass holes thinking they are cool and taking in the back ground drives me nuts...not in a good way. Every now and then they say something worth hearing, but usually they are taking a lot away from the quality of their work. It drops it from semi profession down to sub amateur.
I am not sure I like total silence though. I like very soft, unobtrusive music playing in the background.
I will keep this in mind if i update with DDF. I have been meaning to, but I was kinda turned off by the large increase in price recently. I really like the models they have, so I might have to break down and rejoin, but I am putting it off figuring I will get a little more bang for my buck this way.....of course, they might up the price again before I join, then I would really be pissed!
|
12-06-08 08:54pm
|
Reply
60
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from badandy400:
Ah yes...the beauty of the mute button!
|
12-06-08 01:01pm
|
Reply
61
|
Downblouse Loving
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Monahan:
Hi Wee Willy,
Just discovered this site so I went to TBP & PU for an evaluation. TBP is reasonably high on this site so I'd like any comments from you before I sign up for a month.
Thanks.
Jack
|
05-31-13 02:14pm
|
Reply
62
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
The focus has changed. They always had a lot of the abuse that I mentioned, but I did not see it as what the site was about. I have liked their videos in the past, but really just the sex parts. The abuse has just gotten out of hand and is not sexy.
|
10-15-09 03:51am
|
Reply
63
|
Facial Abuse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from alexmedia:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
The tour page doesn't look like too much abuse. Is it really so extreme?
|
10-15-09 02:45am
|
Reply
64
|
Fame Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from graymane:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Glad to see you were so impressed, WWW.
"the tour" alone of this site doesn't even scratch the surface. You must see these girls from an earlier time, and follow them to where they are now......all done in shoots sans the nudity but so erotically charged they'll bring you right up out of your chair.
For that, one should first go to the archives site.
Ella is my favorite, and to tell you the truth, I'm so damned obsessed with her images that I'll take whatever chances necessary to find and download her updates..... and I do.
I'm exactly like you about the spoils engendered when everything comes off.... the mystique is flushed down the john and one appetite for that subject is foregone and satiated.
These gals have found whatever magic is necessary to continue their sets "creatively covered" and still stoke the scrotum fires and assemble sperms on ready to bale out.
|
09-25-11 06:03pm
|
Reply
65
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from lk2fireone:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
I'm on a very tight budget myself, or I would be if I had more financial self-discipline.
I'm aware that because of the internet, the prices for wonderful porn are far cheaper than what the prices were 20 or 30 or 40 years ago.
But still, having a limited amount of cash to pay for porn, as is true for most people, the cost for each site has to be considered. Along with, the quality of the site: site content, site ease of use, and other factors you consider when deciding whether to join a site or not.
Basically, it comes down to: is the site membership worth the cost?
So I think that it makes sense to write that $30/month for FTV is expensive, compared to other sites that are $20/month, that offer a large amount of professional photo sets of lovely young models.
I'm not saying that FTV is a waste of money.
FTV is an excellent site.
I am saying that I would rather spend less money for access to other excellent sites: photo sites like Metart, MPL studios, Femjoy.
Or video/photo sites like X-art. Or Teen Mega World (not a photo site, but massive amount of hardcore teen videos with a huge amount of attractive models).
|
09-18-15 07:11am
|
Reply
66
|
G Queen
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from smegma11:
AGREE BUT I COULD NOT EVEN ACCESS MOVIES AT ALL
A COMPLETE RIP OFF
SITE SHOULD BE AVOIDED
|
08-08-15 04:13pm
|
Reply
67
|
G Queen
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from lurifax:
I am amazed.
In your 'review/cons:' you have NOT mentioned that the site has a daily download limit of 1.5 GB.
That, if anything, is a con!
|
04-05-09 06:27am
|
Reply
68
|
G Queen
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Denner:
Good warning, thanks...
As a fan of good asian AND japanese-porn I'm glad not to have joined.
|
11-06-08 08:23am
|
Reply
69
|
Gagging Whores
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Lionheart:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
No need to WWW it's fine, like you said to each to his own. I like the this kind of content and I totally respect what other people's views are. I respect that gagging content may not interest you at all, in fact there are many things that I like that other people may object to, but hey we're all different, "to each his own"
|
04-23-08 11:16pm
|
Reply
70
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Thanks, www. I think one of the sites selling points for me is that it is so different from the others. A raunchier Abby Winters as I wrote in my comment way back.
|
05-09-08 06:55am
|
Reply
71
|
Girls Planet
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
I'm curious what the issue was. I've always been somewhat curious about this site but, considering how expensive it is, I've always avoided it.
|
12-12-08 04:45pm
|
Reply
72
|
Girls Planet
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from Drooler:
Ow! $40 smackeroos for so little. That hurts! Thanks for being our risk-taker. We're the better off for getting the "real deal" about this one.
|
12-06-08 02:03am
|
Reply
73
|
Girls Planet
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from mr smut:
Sorry to hear that you lost 40 bucks joining this site. To me this sounds like a real rip-off and it's good that you warn us not to experience the same.
Thanks,
Eddie
|
12-06-08 12:40am
|
Reply
74
|
Graphis
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Capn:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Oh dear....
That doesn't sound good.
Have you tried Ginseng? ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-18-10 03:58pm
|
Reply
75
|
Graphis
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Capn:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Well, did you sign up?
If you did, what is your opinion, please?
Thanks,
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-17-10 03:55pm
|
