| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1076
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Pink Taco:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I stand corrected. I was able to find one b/g scene of TT on Twisty's (which leads me to believe she probably has more on there, but I am not a member to see). Unfortunately the scene I found, she has waaaaay too much makeup caked on. Which is a disservice to someone as naturally pretty as her.
|
07-10-12 02:38pm
|
Reply
1077
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Pink Taco:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
You must be referring to Tiffany Thompson. She is smoking hot, and as far as I know, X-Art is the only place she has done boy/girl, which makes a membership to X-Art worth the price of admission all by itself!! Shortly after her first X-Art go-round she got out of the business...then thankfully decided to come back. She has/had her own site "Tiff Love" but I am not sure what happened to that.
|
07-10-12 01:31pm
|
Reply
1078
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Claypaws:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
You are welcome. She was uploaded to Nubiles in July 2011. Uploaded to ATK from February 2011 to February 2012.
|
06-26-12 03:35pm
|
Reply
1079
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Claypaws:
Excellent and thoughtful review with lots of fact and opinion. It is another review that confirms that the site is not for me but it was a pleasure to read.
thenude is my goto listing site too. Tiffany is everywhere, isn't she? She currently has 48 photo sets and 20 videos at ATK Galleria. I am currently a member so let me know if you want any details of those.
Ditto at Nubiles, where she has 4 photo sets and 4 videos.
|
06-26-12 09:32am
|
Reply
1080
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from otoh:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
No problem. I find TheNude a good site for looking up models - in this case their search easily found Tiffany:
http://www.thenude.eu/Tiffany_19467.htm
Hopefully that's the right one! You'll find lots of other sites with her - although they don't seem to have Joymii there yet.
|
06-26-12 12:25am
|
Reply
1081
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I signed up for a Devils Film membership in April, using Mastercard. And the credit card company blocked my account until I spoke with them on the telephone.
The credit card companies are trying to prevent fraud. So if they see a suspicious charge or billing agent, they block the account.
|
06-25-12 06:43pm
|
Reply
1082
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from otoh:
Great review RA, glad you liked the site. I've not joined it yet, but I was recently at Joymii which is very similar, you may want to check it out too. I went for it over X-Art since they seem to have a slightly broader age range of models - the large majority at X-Art seem to be 18-21. I also really like the colour, angles and general videography at Joymii; it's creative, but still explicit.
Still, based on your review, it definitely looks like this is worth a join too!
|
06-25-12 12:02am
|
Reply
1083
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from Ergo Proxy:
I understand your irritation. Currently I am trying to convert my DVD collection into .mkvs for storage on my hard drives. Only lately I managed to get rid of the synch problem. I would suggest you use VLC where you can adjust the time lag between audio and video if there are particular vids you are especially fond of.
|
06-23-12 11:51pm
|
Reply
1084
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from elephant:
Hi Rearadmiral
Thats sucks as audio is very important and especially when it is a film in your language and its out of sync, very annoying. Did you try it on other video players, I use GOM player but sometime have issues and then I'll try VLC or media player classic to see if its any better on these.
|
06-23-12 07:13am
|
Reply
1085
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I just sent you a private email with the link for the $9.95 offer to X-Art for the first month.
Sending you the email, because I don't want to break any PU rules about posting links.
lk2fireone
|
06-21-12 08:02am
|
Reply
1086
|
Lethal Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
The Hot Bods and Tail Pipe was a series I joined for as well. Though they don't have them listed in order, it looks like they have volumes 1-30 in the DVDs. The search system they have is very good once you get used to it since you can search directly for a series by name.
From what it looks like to me they have some of the Lethal Hardcore DVDs on HDVids, which is also included in the membership. It has 6,500 more DVDs than the actual Lethal Hardcore site has. Maybe the 540 on the Lethal Hardcore site are exclusive? It is confusing nonetheless, but I did just let it recur so it's doing something right. From the best I can tell there are no ads that lead to paying more. It is a shame that some of these studio sites don't put just a little more time into them. I'm more satisfied with Lethal Hardcore than my last membership at Videobox.
|
06-16-12 02:59pm
|
Reply
1087
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from slutty:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Interesting ideas, although I doubt many sites would want to post the full hundreds of photos taken in a shoot, it would be nice if they posted a bit more. I always get the same feeling with X-Art, they post so few photos for one set, it leaves you wondering if their photographer is just terrible and they had to delete a crap load of them.
With regard to the poll question, personally I can't stand bad lighting, although I agree that all of the above is appropriate.
|
06-14-12 09:58pm
|
Reply
1088
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from noche:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I agree. The quality of the videos (camera/lighting/bitrate) is way better than most sites out there. I was impressed. Ultimately it's not my thing because I don't like low key mood lighting. But if you like that it's worth checking out.
|
06-13-12 08:43pm
|
Reply
1089
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I should have been clearer about the Super Pack's 4 sites. At one time, all 4 of those sites were standalone sites for $24.95 each and were stream only. So to put all 4 into one package for one price is a bundle. Once they made this bundle, they started allowing downloads. So those sites are no longer stream only and you get all four for $24.95. I had time to think about what I had said in this comment and my review. Haze Her is another of the addons, but the deal I was offered was to Brandi Belle for $1.25 for 3 days unlimited access and downloads. With the fast internet speed was able to download the 200+ scenes from it in two days. This offer came about 2 weeks into a membership. I signed in, it popped up and said it was a gift for being a loyal customer.
And I didn't notice the negative part of the upsells since I usually have at least one of the addon packs so I get most of those scenes that would otherwise require payment to download. It's not much different than how Videobox is with their Evil Angel and Vivid channels. VB keeps the Kink and Reality Kings content out of search results, but the Evil Angel and Vivid still show up.
As for middle of the road, I would guess you are running into the same thing you did on Reality Kings since the models are more on the curvy side. Outside of subjectivity, it's hard to deny the technical quality, the quantity or the value. But you shouldn't feel too bad there. A lot of our members here love Teen Mega World, I was bored with it within a few days because all the models are slim. I'm running into that again on another site rated high by members here, Fucked Hard 18. I've been a member for 2 weeks and have downloaded 6 scenes/videos/pictures because the models don't really interest me. I've always had problems with that when writing a review since I try to be subjective towards the quality, quantity, but have trouble being subjective towards the model types if a site mainly focuses on one type.
I don't know if this will help on Bang Bros, but I started using the "sites" button and going through each of their sites instead of trying to go through the whole network at one time. This way I found the sites/genres I preferred that they have, from there was able to go to individual models that stand out.
|
05-31-12 02:52pm
|
Reply
1090
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I don't have a membership right now, but this is what I remember being there.
Super Pack - Dancing Bear, The CFNM Show, College Rules and one other. These were $24.95 each around this time last year and were stream only.
DVD Pack - No idea what this is, it's some kind of high priced DVD site similar to Videobox.
Then they had a whole list of sites with Spanish name. If you join any of the Spanish sites, you get access to all of them for 24.95. It's very rare, mostly South American models. I want to say the name of it is Culiando.
They also had Reality Kings offers that actually changed price nearly everyday from $9.95 to $24.95.
The site I see when visiting as a guest is the same one I reviewed from. They have been putting subtle and not so subtle changes in for a couple years now, so it's hard for me to say if the changes were there when I was a member. I had been planning on joining again, probably this weekend and will let you know if you do and notice anything differently.
|
05-30-12 07:59pm
|
Reply
1091
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from elephant:
Yes very informative review and great to see someones review of this exciting new site. I'm a total fan of their other site so think I'm gonna enjoy this one, would love to of seen it as part of the network, maybe for $34.99 and included all sites. Still its very up my street with the models included so I'm going to like it I think.
Another huge Gloria fan too, she is something else, very catwalk model like which I love, the kind of stunner you see and go oh wow she is unique and beautiful, often the really cute models have a very unique look and Gloria is one of them and her bod is perfection to say the least, has to have one of the hottest pussies too that she seem to love to be playing with, love to see her in more girl/girl material.
Only other 2 models that are in her league that I brand ultra models (they have to of had their own solo site) are Nata (who was around a while back now but had this real endearing quality to her and stood out as a nude model) and the other one Kat from lay the Kat, she was so myseterious and I just loved her, she had a real beauty sparkle about her. There is not many that are ultra models around but its great when I find a new one. Gloria ticks all the boxes for me.
|
05-27-12 03:32am
|
Reply
1092
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Claypaws:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Gloria (as Kylie) has been a favourite of mine since I first saw her on MET about two and a half years ago. I still think her best photo sets are on what used to be MET Models, now called Erotic Beauty but I also love her photos on Averotica. Diesel seems to be the only source of extensive video of her. I think she is just about perfect too. I love that body type, but, above all, I adore her face and expressions.
The easiest way to turn off java and flash is to use Firefox and download a very useful addon from the addons.mozilla.org site. The addon is called PrefBar. It is simpler and easier to use than the much more comprehensive NoScript addon. When you have installed PrefBar, you get a PB icon in the toolbar (next to home and refresh etc). PB has check toggles for java, javascript, flash, animation and a few other things. Turning on and off is as easy as clicking them. I haven't checked if you already use Firefox but no porn user should be using IE!
|
05-26-12 01:47am
|
Reply
1093
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Claypaws:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thank you for replying so thoroughly to my comment and question. A careful review deserves careful reading :-) The review was very useful to me. And it is interesting how a well written and very favourable review can give me the information I need to conclude that a site is not to my taste.
I think your answer to my question should not get anyone's back up. It helps to make clear who might enjoy the site and who might not. It would seem that the site is not for me but the review and your supplementary answer make it clear that it does very well indeed in its own niche and that those who enjoy that niche would be very satisfied. I had hoped this could be another site with Gloria material that pleases me but I feared this was unlikely. Your answer confirms my fears.
I am also a multiple tab man. On some sites, java that executes on pages can slow things down a lot in multiple tabs and if the site will work with java (not javascript) turned off, this can sometimes speed things up. I usually turn off both java and flash unless there is some significant feature that needs either of those.
|
05-22-12 03:55pm
|
Reply
1094
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Claypaws:
Excellent review which makes it clear from what standpoint it is written too. Very balanced and comprehensive and a great job done.
I wonder if the 317 pages of updates in the preview are in fact the preview for Diesel Network + WOW Girls combined. That would clearly be a mistake. I agree they should include some more samples in the preview as it gives not a lot of indication as to what is in the site.
On the matter of exclusivity, I regard content as exclusive if those particular photos or videos are unique to the site. It does not matter that the models are not exclusive. Many models appear on multiple sites but any site can have exclusive content of a non-exclusive model. I could easily go through their model directory and identify the models I have seen on other sites and probably list their alias names too. But it would still be true that this site's content is exclusive provided the photos and videos on this site do not appear elsewhere.
You mention the big thumbnails. When I was a member of the Diesel Network, there was a slider on the thumbnail page. You could use it to reduce the thumbnail size to a more manageable one that loaded much faster. Perhaps WOW Girls could have a similar feature.
If you are still with me, I have a question. If you were to remove from this site all the videos, all the gg, bg, peeing, toys, masturbation, behind-the-scenes, photos shot as part of a video shoot, and any content duplicated from sites in the Diesel Network, how much would remain?
I ask because I do like their girls but I am not interested in any of the type of content I mention in that list. My question does not in any way detract from your great review or from your score.
|
05-22-12 04:54am
|
Reply
1095
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from gaypornolover:
Another top-quality review, thank you!
|
05-21-12 11:28pm
|
Reply
1096
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from slutty:
Nice review rearadmiral, sounds like a place to keep an eye on. I just wish these guys gave a more in depth preview, as I am curious how much overlap there is - not that I don't trust deiselman, I'd just like to see for myself.
It is sort of troublesome that they show on the scenes preview page 317 pages of scenes (which one could extrapalote to over 7000 scenes given the number shown). Perhaps just an error.
|
05-21-12 04:48pm
|
Reply
1097
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from dieselman:
Please read my reply in other thread.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=71347
Thank you :)
|
05-18-12 03:47pm
|
Reply
1098
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Claypaws:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
That is a nicely considered and generous reply to my comment, rearadmiral.
It is significant how a user's preference for either photos or videos can greatly influence their perception and scoring of a site. I can indeed understand, though not share, the strong appeal of the site to someone who prefers videos.
I have long followed European, Russian and Ukrainian models. I have seen most if not all of the Diesel models on other sites which show models from that region. But that is not necessarily a criticism of the Diesel network. If you were not already familiar with those models, there appears to be much that is of interest here. But if you were already as well acquainted with them from their photos on other sites as I am, there would be very little of interest within the Diesel network.
For example, considering their "Gloria", I already have approximately 8000 images of her as "Kylie" from other sites.
|
05-17-12 02:41pm
|
Reply
1099
|
Emily 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from graymane:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Hi rearadmiral...
I appreciate your input regarding my review.
Although I do feel jerked around by this site, I worry sometimes if problems I'm encountering with this or any other subscriptions might actually not be all their fault.
As computer-dumb, as I'm sad to contemplate, I figure I could be pressing the wrong buttons or feeding it the wrong information to end up like where I am with Emily18. So I go overboard in trying to be fair or charge shortcomings that would effect any site's memberships.
But giving this site every benefit of the doubt, I think it would be of particular interest to you is that they do possess Emily ... and Emily is gifted an ASS some would kill for. So I'll leave you with that thread of thought.
|
05-14-12 04:04pm
|
Reply
1100
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
The main sites at Diesel have great quality in their videos. I am less impressed with their photosets, which are, in my opinion, below the outstanding photosets you get at Metart or MPL Studios, even though the models at Diesel are lovely.
But like you say, making Wow a stand-alone site is an attempt to generate more income.
|
05-13-12 07:14pm
|
