| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
I guess they'll never have zipped files. This is 10 years after my original question! :-)
|
03-06-18 10:38am
|
Reply
252
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
i did not think your reply was demeaning in any way.
Just a wish that the site/network hadn't deleted a lot of old content.
And, in my opinion, a lot of the old content still held value.
I think they deleted the old content for housekeeping reasons: less content means less to manage.
Stay well.
|
03-27-22 10:59am
|
Reply
253
|
Ultra Films
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LKLK:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
I agree that they deleted a lot of content produced years ago.
And, depending on each person's tastes, some of it was worth keeping.
My best guess is they were trying to upgrade the network by dropping older content that they thought was of lower quality: lower definition or less popular or whatever.
But I still feel the network is worth joining, as one of the best hardcore teen networks, because of the attractiveness of the models.
That's my opinion, of course.
I'm impressed by the low membership price they've offered: $70/year for 4 sites.
I was paying $120/year for the 3 sites.
Plus, I forget the exact figure, but Ultra Films cost me around $90/year for when I joined.
And these porn companies don't reward you for loyalty.
If you are stupid enough to keep renewing at your join price, they will charge you that, even when they are offering new members a far lower price.
So I think I was paying over $200, for the 4 sites, when I read that you could get the 4 sites for $70/year.
Which made me realize how stupid I was by just renewing my membership automatically. How much money I was wasting.
But that was my fault. Other people will often take advantage of you, if you don't watch out. That's reality.
So I think that $70/year is a bargain.
A lot of great content has disappeared in internet heaven, by porn companies who've gone out of business.
Again, that's life. But there is also a lot of what I think is good to great content that is being produced today.
Some of these models are cute or attractive or lovely or gorgeous.
So if some older content is no longer available, you have to find newer content that you find appealing.
The internet is huge. There's a ton of content that should fit your tastes. Whatever your tastes.
|
03-27-22 08:00am
|
Reply
254
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from benmar51:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
I was being kind when I said 10 years old - Some of their "NEW" releases go back so far that HD is not possible. For example, today`s(4/4/20) "new" releases were originally produced in 2004, 2004, 2008, 2009, and 2010. This is NOT an aberration. . . This is NORMAL!!
|
04-04-20 12:37pm
|
Reply
255
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from benmar51:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
If you think the premium channels are the reason to join. . . Think again - REALITY KINGS- No new scenes for the last 5 years. . . VIVID - Nothing for the last 2 years; then some 15-20 year-old stuff this Jan,Feb. . . PORN PROS - All I see are DVDs with stars from 8-10 years ago. . . ELEGANT ANGEL and EVIL ANGEL - Half of their recent DVDs are at least 10-15 years old. . . Better off joining the actual sites.
|
02-21-20 07:11pm
|
Reply
256
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from Jay G:
Thanks for your informative review. Always sad when business folk try to up-sell and forget about customer service.
Financially, it always works for awhile because of the law of inertia, but eventually they go the way of K-mart, Sears and Blockbuster.
Vivid was so awesome in its day. Sad to see it slide downhill.
|
09-24-17 11:53am
|
Reply
257
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Man, the classic stuff is the only reason I would even CONSIDER joining this relic of a site. Thanks for letting me know about the disappearing content.
|
09-24-17 10:27am
|
Reply
258
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi Wraith0711! Yes, the movies are now downloadable.
|
09-11-17 06:32am
|
Reply
259
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from LKLK:
I got a similar email today.
The offer is to join all 6 sites, or any one of the 6 sites, for a discounted price,
Maybe my link works better than the one you got.
https://members.vixen.com/videos/?utm_so...aign=V-6S-21-05-29-A
The link I got opens a page (the URL above) that seems to offer your choice of joining all 6 sites, or any sites of your choosing, for a discounted price.
Hope this helps, if you want to join.
I've got too many subs already, to want to join these choices.
|
05-29-21 04:50pm
|
Reply
260
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from elephant:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Yeah I wasn't expecting it, luckily the card company was one that was a sites own billing company and they ended up being ok (probably why it ended up still charging me when last 3 numbers on back were wrong because they hadn't set it up right I dunno, it was a couple of years ago, I also prefer to use epoch and ccbill but you see much more of rocketgate I've noticed and less of these two.
I'd try a prepaid but I'm Uk and can't find one that doesn't charge monthly fee.
|
05-27-19 05:58am
|
Reply
261
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from elephant:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Thanks, Yeah I think I tried that before with the wrong three numbers and still got charged by the wrong processor so unsure if this would happen again, thanks anyway.
|
05-26-19 09:41am
|
Reply
262
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from elephant:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Hi Wraith0711
I think they have maybe changed something cause I tried for ages refreshing the rocketpay payment page must of refreshed it 200 times and nothing changed for, kept deleting cookies and browser data each time but sadly didn't change page.
|
05-26-19 02:57am
|
Reply
263
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
I'm always happy to provide reviews and grateful for the forum to do it.
|
05-09-19 04:41pm
|
Reply
264
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Thanks for this! I keep list in Word format of current and past subscriptions and I am going to copy and paste this comment into that document to remind me to do this on all Lansky sites. This will be cheaper than paying the fees for pre-paid cards when I want to join these sites.
Thanks again Sir!
|
05-09-19 03:02pm
|
Reply
265
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
I've never thought of trying that to get to a preferred biller. I'll have to give that a try sometime. Thanks for mentioning this.
|
03-23-19 07:45am
|
Reply
266
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from Collins:
I've only once successfully downloaded a video this way, every other time it stops part way through with a download error.
|
08-12-24 05:35pm
|
Reply
267
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from Collins:
I've only once successfully downloaded a video this way, every other time it stops part way through with a download error.
|
08-12-24 05:35pm
|
Reply
268
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Comment
from Collins:
I've only once successfully downloaded a video this way, every other time it stops part way through with a download error.
|
08-12-24 05:34pm
|
Reply
269
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from Jeffrey99:
I agree with almost all that you said, when asked on limits on forum webmaster said "all sites have download limits", which we know is a lie. But even at that 10 on a VR sites is ridiculous.
I will admit I haven't really had any problem with their navigation. Even though no favorites is a stupid thing.
|
01-18-20 05:46am
|
Reply
270
|
VR Bangers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from tangub:
Download limits suck especially when sites don't declare them before you signed up. Last Sunday I signed up to a site as a result of an email promo offering a Black Friday/Cyber Monday half price deal and within 10 minutes of logging in I had hit a download limit after downloading only 11 photo zips despite the sign up page advertising "unrestricted downloads".
|
12-06-19 07:04am
|
Reply
271
|
Waitress POV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Yeah, I hear you... I've also joined some sites just to get one or two scenes I really wanted.
|
07-29-20 11:18am
|
Reply
272
|
Waitress POV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(Wraith0711's Reply)
Good to know! I agree with you that no one is monitoring downloads 24/7. If you've hit a limit then there has to be an automatic one.
It'll probably be at least a month before I'm able to join. I'm in the process of closing a sale on my house and moving so I don't want porn memberships recurring during that time.
I know I haven't been active here but I have been lurking. I've reached a point where I cycle through the same sites over and over (probably at least 25-30 of them) so it doesn't make sense for me to write reviews of sites I've already reviewed if nothing has changed.
But I am still around!
|
07-28-20 12:32pm
|
Reply
273
|
Waitress POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from rearadmiral:
I get why you scored this site/network low but based partly on your review I think I'll rejoin soon. Waitress POV seems like a site I'll like and it wasn't part of the Fetish Network back when I last joined.
I appreciate the warning on the download limit. I don't recall a limit being in place last time so that may be new. I normally download 1080p scenes so I won't face the same frustrations as you with 4K and hitting the limit after two or three files. I'm generally okay with reasonably limits but I also think that what's reasonable changes as resolutions go up and so do file sizes.
|
07-28-20 03:54am
|
Reply
274
|
Waitress POV
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from LKLK:
I'm being nit-picky.
So please excuse the objection, if you want to.
You write "This network was a complete ripoff."
I think you meant to write the "site" was a complete ripoff.
Because you gave the network (Team Skeet) a score of 95, and previously wrote that Team Skeet is one of your favorite networks.
But it's obvious that this part of the Team Skeet network is poor.
And has lots of problems that need to be fixed.
Which are useful objections.
Broken links, non-exclusive content, download limits that are troubling for 4K users, cancellation problems.
So a score of 60 is fair.
And the review serves a worthwhile purpose in pointing out the site problems.
|
07-28-20 03:07am
|
Reply
275
|
Wankz VR
(0)
|
Reply of
Wraith0711's Review
from lk2fireone:
"Freakin huge file sizes(average is around 7-9 gb), some in excess of 19gb"
I'm not into VR.
Don't have the equipment for it.
But even if I did have the VR equipment, you would also need a fast net connection.
And loads of disk space to store the files.
So, a huge investment, that requires lots of money.
But the review is excellent, for pointing out details for VR fans and not-fans.
|
04-21-19 09:54am
|
