Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : LKLK (0)  

Feedback:   All (518)  |   Reviews (162)  |   Comments (40)  |   Replies (316)

Other:   Replies Received (290)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 251-275 of 290 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
251
Visit Ultra Films

Ultra Films
(0)
REPLY TO #11 from avgazn86: (LKLK's Reply)

Hey,

I see that they have added a new site since the last time I had a membership. Did they include that site in the package on sign-up or is it still the same 4 sites with the membership with really only 2 of the 4 still updating?


10-21-23  07:34am

Reply
252
Visit Ultra Films

Ultra Films
(0)
REPLY TO #8 from avgazn86: (LKLK's Reply)

Thank you! I really appreciate it. I just sent out an email. I appreciate the help!

04-02-22  03:42am

Reply
253
Visit Ultra Films

Ultra Films
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from avgazn86: (LKLK's Reply)

I have tried using the email system here, but it was to no avail. It seems that I did not get your email as well. This reply was the only notification I had, but no other system notifications were given to indicate a received email.

03-31-22  03:36am

Reply
254
Visit Ultra Films

Ultra Films
(0)
Reply of LKLK's Review from avgazn86:

I would like to know where this link to the discount is. lol

When I joined, it was through a discount link, however it did not give me access to Ultra Films, even though that was the impression I got when I signed up through the email link I received.

And I agree with you on how the sites can be hard to distinguish at times. One would think that they could tell the difference between the style and genre just by the name of the site on the network, but this is not the case being that the scenes seemingly blend together. Not really saying that this would be a misstep, but in my opinion should be defined clearer.

Good review LKLK!


03-30-22  04:42am

Reply
255
Visit Ultra Films

Ultra Films
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Wraith0711: (LKLK's Reply)

I wasn't demeaning your review Sir, I love the network. $70 is an excellent price for a full year. It just sucks because my trusty wd external got dropped and It had all my old videos from this site and another dead site lesbo101 on it. I was heartbroken to find that a great portion was gone from the site. The site has some of the first content and plenty since of the lovely ageless wonder Gina Gerson, one of my all time favorites ever.

03-27-22  10:40am

Reply
256
Visit Ultra Films

Ultra Films
(0)
Reply of LKLK's Review from Wraith0711:

I rejoined after a few years and was surprised at how much content was removed. Really disappointed with the network. They really need to do a archive site for their back catalog that they have purged. Stuff from the now unavailabe natasha shy, beata porn, super skinny girl and so on, this stuff is just to good to leave abandoned on a disconnected server.

03-27-22  07:26am

Reply
257
Visit Ultra Films

Ultra Films
(0)
Reply of LKLK's Review from Avory:

Thank you LKLK for your very fine review. I appreciate when reviewers comment not only on a site's offerings, but put them in the context of their own viewing habits. If they comport with our own (or differ) it helps the consumer decide whether or not that aspect of the site has might have similar applicability.

I particularly appreciated your description of your viewing habits and the need for greater resolution. Like you, the benefit of higher quality formats are way outweighed by the challenge of storing huge files. We elderly fans are probably more consumed by collecting than the younger generation, preferring to keep what we like rather than consume and toss aside. The latter is a more practical way to live, of course (and more sensible, given the immense amount of worthwhile porn out there) but I can't shake the need to preserve what successfully turns me on, so file size is important. And if you aren't blowing things up on a 65" screen, I fail to see the point of anything larger than 1080p, and in many cases well-produced 720p is fine for these eyes.

I might add, it appears that for at least a limited time, your suggestion to Ultra Films/Wow Girls for a combined membership has been taken. I received an email offering all four sites for $70 annually (recurring, no less!) This seems like a a stupendous deal, which should cause anyone who has been hemming and hawing about joining to take the plunge. I confess to enjoy leavening my porn consumption of young Eastern European hotties like those featured in this site by alternating with other sites which feature American gals and/or gals with a little maturity, but that can easily be done through other memberships when Wow Girls comes at this price. To be honest, my interest in the Wow Girls family largely comes from my exposure to some of their solo clips rather than the "glamcore." If you're a solo fan like I am who appreciates highly explicit views that aren't all toycentric--i.e. lots of leisurely spread pussy and spread ass views--Wow Girls has impressed me on that front in my limited experience. Hope the reality fits the impression.


11-23-20  08:11am

Reply
258
Visit Unlimited MILFs

Unlimited MILFs
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from marcdc1: (LKLK's Reply)

Thank you LKLK,

I know it will never happen. But Id love for the make-up teams to focus on letting each individuals beauty shine through instead of trying to make every woman look the same.

I support each person making her own choices (especially around medical and surgical decisions). But just from my laymens perspective, it seems like too many women are told they need to do things because its what sells. - from someone who pays for his porn, what sells is being interesting and unique.

But maybe guys like us are too few and the fans really do want to see every woman barbi-ized?


06-06-21  08:24am

Reply
259
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Dan Tanna: (LKLK's Reply)

Thank you for the quick and kind reply. I was able to find the cancel link in bang.com, not videosz.com. They do make it difficult. They just don't get it. It's so easy to get free porn now, they are not helping their cause by acting this way. Thanks again.

01-03-20  12:42pm

Reply
260
Visit Vixen.com

Vixen.com
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Wraith0711: (LKLK's Reply)

Thank you Sir, it worked. I finally noticed that the link in my emails were trying to send me directly into the members area

05-29-21  05:42pm

Reply
261
Visit Vixen.com

Vixen.com
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from tangub: (LKLK's Reply)

I suspect given jjrabbit's stated location in Netherlands he would be subject to the non US regional pricing rip off. Even using the PU discount link I would get charged £29.95 (GBP) to join this site equivilent of almost $37 (USD) at today's exchange rate. I'm afraid it's been a long time since I've been willing to pay that sort of price for any site. I'll rarely pay more than $10-15 these days.

04-21-20  05:32am

Reply
262
Visit VR Bangers

VR Bangers
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Anth: (LKLK's Reply)

All you need is an Oculus Go that can be bought for £150 now (you only need the 32GB one, the 64GB one that I bought, I wish I didn't).

Once you've tried VR you likely won't go back. I remember the first VR video I seen it was one of the Sorority house videos on this VRBangers site and I actually almost said "sorry girls got to go" before it hit me, what am I doing. You do get immersed into it. And thus its good while the whole planet is on lockdown for Covid19.

The OculusGo is great, as you can also get either the Netflix or Pigasus player and I just use it to watch movies on it also and it feels like I am in the cinema and looking at a huge cinema screen.

I would suggest signing up to CzechVR to your first site as that is easily the best.

VRBangers, the Soririty Girls videos are amazing on here. But they have went insane with the amount of adverts.


05-06-20  12:18am

Reply
263
Visit Waitress POV

Waitress POV
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Wraith0711: (LKLK's Reply)

I'm all for criticism as long as it's constructive Sir. This is part or the fetish network and not teamskeet.

07-28-20  04:52am

Reply
264
Visit Waitress POV

Waitress POV
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from rearadmiral: (LKLK's Reply)

I may be wrong with this, but Waitress POV is part of the Fetish Network isn't it? I didn't think that there was a connection between Team Skeet and Fetish Network.

07-28-20  03:56am

Reply
265
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Wraith0711: (LKLK's Reply)

Glad your ok sir! Find some nice hot nurse porn and get yourself to feeling better!!

05-08-24  08:18pm

Reply
266
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
Reply of LKLK's Review from Wraith0711:

Hey LKLK, are you doing ok? Haven't seen any recent posts from you. Hope all is well with you!

05-08-24  05:01pm

Reply
267
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of LKLK's Review from exotics4me:

I think I deserve tickets for this review. I didn't know my opinion was up for review. And by the way, LK, if you've forgotten, making eye jokes isn't a laughing matter with me. I'm partially blind in one eye. I'll give you the PU vet "pass" and let this one slide but seriously, review the site you're reviewing, stop shilling Teen Mega World and stop reviewing other members opinions.

08-05-21  05:02pm

Reply
268
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of LKLK's Comment from Homegirl:

https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=5209.

Vendo is on the good list.


05-29-20  12:00am

Reply
269
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of LKLK's Comment from Homegirl:

They just started a new site Fllth Flix and it is still 9.95.

It is not part of the network.


05-28-20  11:50pm

Reply
270
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of LKLK's Comment from Homegirl:

Vendo is just fine, but there are others too. I saw a list of good billers on one of the forum threads.

05-28-20  11:48pm

Reply
271
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of LKLK's Review from LKLK:

REVIEW(CONTINUES):
There are no download limits.
The content is exclusive.

The content does not appeal to me.
The models are teens, which are my favorite type of models.
When I stream a video, the definition of the video seems low: it's like I'm watching a 360p video.
The images are not clear and crisp.
I can watch videos at all of my other paysites, and get clear, crisp images.
But at Wet and Puffy, the videos seem like they were shot by an amateur.
The videos are not sharply focused.
I can appreciate the videos at the Wow sites, the Teen Mega World sites, but not at the Wet and Puffy site.

So even though other PU members have found a lot to appreciate at this site, I regret my join.
I only paid $9.95 for one month, but one month was enough for me.

However, the $60 for 1 year price is very attractive, if you do enjoy the site.
I would rather pay a higher price, and find a site i enjoy more.

I don't like the clarity of the videos.
I don't like the photo sets.
I don't like the content.


Giving the site a score of 79.
If you enjoy the videos and photosets, as other PU members seem to, then you would rate the site much higher.


05-20-20  05:20am

Reply
272
Visit Wicked Pictures

Wicked Pictures
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Wraith0711: (LKLK's Reply)

Lklk, I wholeheartedly agree with you on this. A very wise man once said “to each their own.”

06-21-21  05:54pm

Reply
273
Visit Wicked Pictures

Wicked Pictures
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from pat362: (LKLK's Reply)

I'm uploading my review of AT in a couple of minutes but one of the reasons why I love AT is in large part because of Pure Taboo. This is in my opinion the best site for scenario driven porn. They don't always hit it outside the park but they always give it their all. I may add a review of just PT because I think it deserves it and it's not really possible with my At review.

04-10-20  11:02am

Reply
274
Visit Wicked Pictures

Wicked Pictures
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from pat362: (LKLK's Reply)

For me it's two folds. On the one hand you can download the entire movie thereby making each sex scenes longer by default but ultimately the sex portion will still be about 15 minutes long and that is too short in my opinion. Here is my basic breakdown. Foreplay that can be a mix of kissing and touching should be at least 3 to 5 minutes long, then undressing and getting ready is another 1 to 2 minutes and then there is more foreplay before they start fucking. I've already used up 4 to 7 minutes of the sex scene and if we want some realism in what is essentially couple friendly porn than you need at least 15 minutes of actual fucking. I'm already well above 20 minutes and I'm being conservative on the time.

For me an ideal porn scene is over 40 minutes long with at least 30 of those minutes dedicated to the performers being naked and having sex. Rarely will I be happy if it's less.


04-10-20  10:58am

Reply
275
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Zerp40k: (LKLK's Reply)

Thanks LKLK.

Those two cross sales are nasty and they pop back if you change card type.

Tried what you said. no dice. I guess I'll have to accept that any site using Vendo is barred to me...


07-04-20  09:08am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 251-275 of 290 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.89 seconds.