| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from FuckingGambler:
Thank you very much for your detailed review, and we obviously appreciate high rating you have given to our site.
We also want to comment on your concern about reliability of our "witness" program, and reassure you and all PornUser members that we are committed to this concept, and that at least one of our members (paying or free) will be invited to shooting in April in Budapest. Of course, we cannot guarantee that it will be you who will win the draw, but what we can guarantee is fair handling of the draw, with all our employees and affiliates being excluded.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask them here, or in our forums, or via e-mail to support@fuckinggamble.com .
|
02-02-10 10:14pm
|
Reply
27
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Capn:
Yes, that is an interesting review of a very specific site.
If you are into games did you see my assessment of Virtual Fem recently?
|
02-02-10 03:44pm
|
Reply
28
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(asmith12's Reply)
Well, it is exclusive in the sense that it licensed from the producer.
I don't know if that older material is still available from the producer's Clips4Sale store though.
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-02-10 09:08am
|
Reply
29
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Capn:
I know a little background to this.
The membership site is licensed older material from LostBets.com Clips4Sale site.
That would explain why it is not up to current standards.
That said I do not know how good the more modern stuff is because I think the Clips4Sale prices are far too salty!
Cap'n. :0(
|
02-01-10 11:35am
|
Reply
30
|
Spicy Roulette
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from mbaya:
I am hesitant because the site is so new. How much content is there on the site? Is there enough to justify the present price?
|
12-28-09 03:30am
|
Reply
31
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#25
from malikstarks:
(asmith12's Reply)
Indeed. They should have a sample up, but I think that would cause a near mutiny among those who do not have immediate access to it. However it is very impressive and even more so considering they are pumping out 2-3 a day. I would offer to upload the file where you could see it, but I know we can't do that.
Might make a good topic for the forum for members to simply compare various sites. The other topics related to bitrate seemed to speak mainly of the technical aspects.
|
11-18-09 09:08pm
|
Reply
32
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#21
from malikstarks:
(asmith12's Reply)
In truth looking now having looked over the site a bit more it looks as though I may have exaggerated the file sizes a bit. Most of the 1080p are around 2.5-3.5 GB's with only a few being over 4GB. That goes to show I really haven't downloaded very many. Still they are best I have seen, at least imho.
|
11-17-09 07:59am
|
Reply
33
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#20
from malikstarks:
(asmith12's Reply)
The only scene I have currently is:
Site: Big Wet Butts
Scene: Triple Butt Pump
Size: 4.35 GB (4,675,992,829 bytes)
Length: 51 minutes 16 seconds (fairly long)
What is the bitrate then, and how does it compare?
Also how do you calculate it?
|
11-17-09 07:40am
|
Reply
34
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from malikstarks:
(asmith12's Reply)
I don't know how to find the bitrate on the video, but if you tell me how to find it I will look it up and tell you.
|
11-16-09 10:14pm
|
Reply
35
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from malikstarks:
(asmith12's Reply)
Just as a heads up if you are looking for an HD experience that is closer to what Brazzers has, I looked around and the Zero Tolerance site comes a bit closer. Although it still is not quite Brazzers quality (as far as the 1080p) it comes a bit closer than Ass Traffic. Plus the file sizes are a bit more reasonable (than Brazzers).
I've been thinking about giving it try myself.
|
11-16-09 12:28am
|
Reply
36
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from malikstarks:
(asmith12's Reply)
I didn't mean that it was an advantage, it is in fact a drawback, but I don't consider it a major one since it does play smoothly on my computer, I just can't go jumping around as far as fast forwarding and rewinding. I can still pause it start it back fine, and I'm sure there are computers more powerful than mine that can handle ff and rr. I don't mind just watching a video and letting the plot play out without skipping all over the place, at least once in a while. If I want to ff and rr I have the option to download the 720 hd and do that.
I hope you are not under the impression that I am a big time Brazzers guy. I just think they have gotten a bit of a bum rap although I have tried to be fair and see both sides. To tell you the truth it is only one of a number of sites I am member of (mainly since I still have the $9.99 discount) and I probably have only downloaded maybe two of the HD scenes in question. They do take up alot of space 4-5 GBs, plus it takes me at least a full day to download just one. I am saying BECAUSE of those attributes it is unreasonable to let everyone download them due to server demand and the lag it would cause for everyone.
Really if I didn't have the discount I would have already moved on from this site, I've mainly kept it for the value.
|
11-16-09 12:05am
|
Reply
37
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from malikstarks:
(asmith12's Reply)
I just downloaded the AssTraffic HD Sample. While it is not far from the Brazzers quality it does not quite match it. Brazzers if brighter with much richer color textures. The difference is not huge but substantial, and definetly noticeable immediately.
Put it this way, I have a very powerful computer that plays the Brazzers HD smoothly with no problem at all, but if I try to fast forward a scene it will not let me do it, the video freezes. No other HD porn has ever given me that problem. I may start a forum thread to see if anyone else knows of a site with HD of the same quality.
As well though the other concerns about AssTraffic still stands, namely a lack of updates (according to the TBP review), and no network access.
|
11-14-09 11:59pm
|
Reply
38
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from malikstarks:
(asmith12's Reply)
You make some good points. While I do believe it is fair to charge a fee for the 1080p blue ray. They should let you know up front that it is not an immediate part of the membership. Really what they ought to do is as I had previously suggested, make the 720p HD available immediately, since that is what most sites are offering now. That would still allow them to charge the premium for the full HD.
Overall then we disagree over whether or not it is fair to charge the premium, but agree that it they should be more up front about it, or at least need to find a different way to do it.
As for Ass Traffic, I already conceded that they may well have the same quality HD as the Brazzers 1080p Blue Ray. However I am not sure, maybe I will download the sample and give you my opinion in a couple of days. The only thing I would say that it is apparent that not all 1080p is created equal, since the website Pornpros also advertises 1080p but it is nothing close to Brazzers quality.
|
11-14-09 10:59pm
|
Reply
39
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from pat362:
I agree that this is one of those sites that should simply state that HD is a reward for long term members. It would take next to no place and would avoid disapinting paying memebers. I truly do not care for HD so the fact that they don't offer it upfront would not affect my review.
|
11-14-09 09:24am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from pat362:
(asmith12's Reply)
I agree that it's pure cheating if they say that members can get it on with pornstars. I know that Be The Mask was one of those that lied. All the males were professionals or semi-pros. In any case I for one would never want to sleep with a pornstar. My curiosity does not outweight my fear of catching a serious STD.
|
11-14-09 09:08am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from pat362:
(asmith12's Reply)
I suspect that most of these so called real people are mostly boyfriends of the stars. Since they aren't actual professional then I guess you could claim that they are real people. It's kind os stretching the truth but since porn is fantasy then what's another lie.
I'm far more curious about guys that pay very high prices to sleep with pornstars that escort. How many truly do that and how are the old bait and switch.
|
11-13-09 06:19pm
|
Reply
42
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from rome476:
They have great content and offer an amazing number of videos. I had a year membership that was great but when I signed for another one I started being constantly locked to the point that they refunded my money. I don't know what happened and I'd really like to sign up again but I don't need the aggravation.
|
11-13-09 02:46pm
|
Reply
43
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from picdude:
Whoa thanks for pointing this out, I had a look before and even got so far as the sign up page - no sign of any HD extra.
I agree with you it is cheating since they don't tell you upfront, very misleading.
One Huge plus I'd give them is whilst their scripting is quite good, they are getting some awesome locations/sets these days.
|
11-13-09 02:26am
|
Reply
44
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from RagingBuddhist:
(asmith12's Reply)
Even though you didn't seem to take offense at my little charge of ignoring all the comments on here, I'll still apologize for it. Knowing that such blatantly shady business practices should continue to reward these people really plucks my nerves, and I just spoke off the top of my head.
If I could use BBCode or html here, the following would be in a 72 point, bold, italicized, underlined and red font:
JUST SAY, "NO!"
"THEY ONLY WWANT YOUR MONEY!"
The rant is done for now. I'll now go back to more a more Buddhist pursuit. Time to feed my fish and sit back to watch them eat.
|
11-13-09 02:18am
|
Reply
45
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from james4096:
I do hate what they do. I believe that over the years the total number of monthly subscriptions must be over one million. They should just offer HD vids for everybody on day one just like every other big site is doing today. They can afford it.
|
11-13-09 01:59am
|
Reply
46
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
I have to ask how you've missed all the comments and reviews about this site - a lot of which deal with the HD issue. They're definitely one of the most underhanded, sneaky and deceptive sites out there. If I had the money, I'd think about taking out billboards to tell people to stay away from here. (Okay - that's a stretch. But I can't seem to yell, "Just say NO!" loud enough!)
There are over 40 active reviews and more than 60 comments up about this site and, unless I missed it, I don't see one webmaster reply to anything that's been said about them, either good or bad. But, from the way the site is run, they obviously don't care what people think. As long as they keep the site cheap, they know people will keep signing up and they'll keep making money. I can easily imagine them sitting around a table, laughing their asses off, as they discuss the next bullshit scheme they're working on to gouge their customers.
|
11-13-09 12:06am
|
Reply
47
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from TheRizzo:
Yeah Brazzers is one of the most deceptive sites out there which is why I personally stay away despite them having pretty good content.
|
11-12-09 11:50pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from RagingBuddhist:
(asmith12's Reply)
Have a look here:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/08/12/colb.p...rnography/index.html
The simplest, most basic difference between prostitution and having sex in a porn flick is that all the participants in a porn flick are getting paid.
While I never underestimate a human's ability to fall to new levels of stupidity, I can't imagine someone fronting a brothel with a website. It'd be too easy for an undercover cop to accept the invitation to see if everything's legit.
|
11-12-09 11:46pm
|
Reply
49
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from TheRizzo:
I find Brazzers extremely over the top pushing the cross sales etc, that it just keeps me away from them. Though I agree when you just get to their actual content it is pretty good.
|
11-12-09 11:43pm
|
Reply
50
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from malikstarks:
(asmith12's Reply)
Wanted to make an addition to my response.
During my normal surf session today I did notice that Pornpros also states they are using 1080p, so it is open to debate. However I also am a member at Pornpros (9.99 loyalty discount) and I am quite sure the 1080p they use is not nearly the quality as that of Brazzer'. (not even close) Looking further the file sizes for even the most recent Pornpros HD vids only range between 600-700mb's. While for Brazzers they range from about 4-5 GB's.
Even still I'm sure Brazzers advantage will not be a permanent one in this regard, and it will be interesting to see what happens when others catch up.
|
11-12-09 05:09pm
|
