Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from malikstarks:
(asmith12's Reply)
Lol, I wish I were a webmaster for Brazzers, I'm sure it would be much more lucrative than what I am doing currently. Nonetheless...
First off I originally stated that Brazzer's HD is the best I have PERSONALLY seen; I'm no expert on the subject. You may indeed know of other sites that offer video that is equal in quality to what they have at the moment. (Although I would probably guess that there are not many.)
As for Ass Traffic, it is a site that I was vaguely familiar with before but had never had an interest in membership. Now after having had a look they do indeed shoot vids in 1080p so it probably does match Brazzers offer from that standpoint.
However even if it does offer 1080p it still a poor comparison since:
#1 There is no network access.
#2 Site hasn't been an updated since August (according to the TBP review in September 09) may well be dead, not sure since the have no update schedule listed on the preview.
#3 As of the TBP review in September they only had about 138 HD videos. Brazzers has a little over 300 already with updates of 2-3 per day.
Nonetheless, some have brought up legitimate beefs with the Brazzers model that I do agree with. First if you purchase a yearly pass you should be given access to the HD vids immediately since you have already paid up front. (I actually think that is a bit ridiculous.) They should also think about giving immediate access to the 720 HD since that is what you would get immediately at a comparable site
All in all I'm pretty confident that Brazzers is the only one putting out 1080p porn in quantities this large. Even DDF's vids aren't nearly as impressive and they've been the standard for a while now (as for as networks). For that I think charging a premium is fair. Besides from an IT standpoint offering complete unrestricted access to file sizes that large would be painful at best. I've been on sites that had no HD and what shut me out due to server demand (Scoreland).
Speaking of Scoreland now THAT is model I disagree with. They segregate nearly ALL of their HD content to a completely separate site called ScoreHD. It's basically the same exact videos from across the Score networks but just in HD format, forcing you to pony up another $30 (standard price) if you want the HD vids. (But there are no pic sets at SCORE HD)
|
11-12-09 10:44am
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(asmith12's Reply)
If the porn itself isn't illegal, why wouldn't it be legal? There might be local laws in some places that would keep them from advertising in mainstream media like newspapers and public postings, but I don't think anyone's legislated against webmasters recruiting from their own sites. At least not yet, anyway.
|
11-12-09 06:37am
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(asmith12's Reply)
I'm sure it's probably illegal in many southern states and most non-European countries, but so is females wearing pants in Malasia and many Muslim countries.
|
11-12-09 05:32am
|
Reply
54
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from malikstarks:
I didn't want to play the bad guy here, but I think this site is getting a bit of a bum rap. First I would say that the new 108p HD videos are absolutely STUNNING!! It's not easy to impress your average porn connoisseur nowadays, but I can honestly say It is by far the best HD I have personally seen on the web, I don't know if it can even get any better. Certainly I will admit that they had issues before with vid quality but now they have clearly gone from worst to first in dramatic fashion.
That said, I can also see from a business standpoint how it is fair to charge a premium for the new HD. First off as stated before it is by far the best HD out there, particularly if your talking about "mainstream" sites. Second, as they have mentioned, if they allow everyone access to the HD vids it would almost certainly overload their servers. Most of the 1080p vids are huge, were talking 4-5GB's for a typical 30 minute scene. Even the 720p vids are around 2-3GBs. If they just allowed the typical user with a high end computer and a fast connection to download whatever they wanted it would be a nightmare for everyone, including those just wanting to get the regular wmv quality.
Nonetheless if you still want to get the HD vids you have two ways to do so. Purchase the credits, or remain a member for 6 months. I think that's fair. Many users like myself took advantage of the loyalty discount a while back for $9.99 a month so it's not that bad. (Don't know if they still offer it now)
As far as the billing issues I can't speak to that, although I am not downplaying it. I'm just saying it hasn't happened to me and I've been a member for a while, had to change credit cards etc. I will say that for those who had yearly memberships that is indeed a bummer. They ought to have some sort of yearly recurring membership so you don't have to renew manually, but I can see how some people wouldn't want a membership to recur yearly, most sites have that as a one time thing.
|
11-09-09 02:00pm
|
Reply
55
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(asmith12's Reply)
IMHO, personal taste varies, which is part of what makes it personal. :)
One problem with Playboy, for me, is the models use too much silicone for the boob jobs (or maybe it's saline, for some of them).
|
11-02-09 08:28am
|
Reply
56
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from anyonebutme:
I've been reading elsewhere, this kind of shit Brazzers is pulling is getting very serious for a lot of innocent people. One claims he signed up for a month, turned around and there was a $1,100 charge on the credit card from them! Brazzers saying money was spent through their live feeds / chats / something, and threatening legal numerous actions if not paid.
|
10-25-09 03:42pm
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(asmith12's Reply)
Yes. Download limit per day.
|
09-19-09 02:05am
|
Reply
58
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(asmith12's Reply)
Here I go again, with the same evil smile on my face.
A good content production team? Anyone paying attention to my rants against this site will know I'm no fan. So, to make sure it isn't just my disdain for the site, I just looked at the reviews on here. Almost every review, even the best of 'em, cites video quality as a con and most mention repetitive content. That doesn't do anything but reinforce my opinion that this site is nothing but marketing.
Their marketing tactics will only backfire when people wake up and see what they're really getting for the low initial cost of admission. I was actually a member here once and I wouldn't give 50¢ for all the lackluster content I saw. Subsequent reviews tell me it hasn't changed all that much, except for the HD video you have to wait six months for.
Personally, I don't like dealing with a site that seems to come up with a new money-grubbing scheme every month or so, and I'll never understand why others do.
|
09-11-09 08:04pm
|
Reply
59
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
It never ceases to amaze me how many ways this site comes up with to make money. And yet, they must be doing something right - people keep going back.
The Rage continues...
|
09-10-09 08:55am
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#41
from Khan:
(asmith12's Reply)
Yeah, I know the staff replies don't "stand out" for approved post ... that's ok. Generally they're standard system msg's or friendly asides. If something were real important, or kept up after the friendly aside, I'd send an email.
Again, my thanks to you both.
|
08-22-09 06:04am
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#36
from exotics4me:
(asmith12's Reply)
(continued)
Now, my allegation against you, is not an allegation. I'm not posting it on the forum. I'm not chasing your every review with "I think this guy has something to do with kink". It is just something that had went through my mind over the last couple of years. And anyone with the ability to comprehend those 4 points I made, can see why I would wonder. I wonder if Jennifer Lopez' ass is flabby. I wonder if Burger King has the Angry Whopper back. I wonder a lot of things. But, this is not my site, I'm sure Khan and Rick have more means than I do to know if you are affiliated with the kink sites. If they're okay with you, than so am I. Doesn't mean I can't still wonder though. You are welcome to find one time where I have said, "I know you work for kink". Go ahead. That's an allegation. My opinion is that there are some things that makes your membership here a little fishy. That's my opinion.
Tell me, how many times have I replied to you without you replying to me first? Zero. I know your type all too well. You like to argue meaningless shit while soothing your ego by trying to talk over others.
Why do you keep mentioning the other members reading this? What are they going to do? Say, "Oh hell asmith is right about everything, I no longer trust exotics because he won't apologize to him." You don't think they will look at those 4 points and understand why I would wonder? And see that I never allegedly said you worked for the site? And then wonder why in the hell you keep asking me to apologize to you? And then see how petty you are?
The members here, whether they like me or hate me, know that I am mainly here to post reviews filled with factual information, and offer any help to any of them with any site they are interested in and I've been a member of. You think this little petty shit is going to change that? You've got serious problems if you believe any of this was "serious allegations" or if you think I "attacked" you. Why don't you dip into the old sensationalistic writing bucket a little? Create a little drama there.
Most of all though, when you start to wave your moralistic values flag again, remember that you are claiming not to have a problem with different opinions. Then, ask yourself, who replied to who in this poll? Then ask yourself if you agreed with my opinion. If not, did dispute it? Yes? So that is you showing how you have no problems with differing opinions? And to think, you really think you have everyone on your side. Catch the next train, the one that says "Reality" on the front. At least my harshness at times, is known and isn't directed at other long-time members. I won't argue this with you anymore. Go change my trust vote. I'll leave yours at yes. Like before, unlike you, I take members for their reviews and contributions to the site. Doesn't mean I necessarily like them though. So, get over it or don't.
|
08-21-09 01:11pm
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#35
from exotics4me:
(asmith12's Reply)
You're just being foolish now. If you remember, I plainly said that I had wondered about your affiliation with the kink.com sites long before this incident. The word mistake, was one that I admitted and apologized to the site for. That doesn't change me wondering about your affiliation with the sites. Because you're not going to shut the hell up until I explain that, I will do that now. You can see that my wondering had much weight to it before this incident.
#1 Your original problem with me was a 70 review for Ultimate Surrender. A review that clearly said the site would have been a 90 if they dropped their DL Limit or raised it to a more respectable number than 10 GB per month. I even said if they do one of those things, I will edit the score and add the 20 points back, which I have done. Why would a customer of a site get as pissed off as you did over my deduction? The regular PU or general public could read where I even said, if that download limit doesn't bother you, go ahead and add the 20 points back in your head. The only possible reason I can see for someone being upset over the deduction is because of the fact that the site went into PU's average score per site rankings with a 70. It would hurt the cumulative score.
#1a You have posted a comment on one of kink's sites questioning the calculation of the cumulative score. How many regular members go around calculating the scores of sites? And when added with #1, I think it is safe to say that anyone would have right to be skeptical of your involvement here.
#3 and #4 Three of your four top sites are kink.com sites. I don't have a problem with that. But when added to #1 and #1a, the skepticism rises. Especially seeing that you have those 3 sites about 20 points higher than you do your average site. Add to this, you, like other webmasters and site staff members that post here, do not participate in the weekly member raffle or collect tickets. Now, mind you, that is your business and I want no explanation for it. All I am saying is that there is 4 things to make me skeptical of you.
You're not helping matters by saying you have no problem with differing opinions. So, why exactly were you mad over my 20 point deduction? That was, in my opinion, the right deduction since the limit severely limited how much content I could download. But you don't have a problem with differing opinions?
How about in this very poll. You countered my opinion to it, by telling me what was correct. Maybe you missed the memo, but opinions cannot be wrong or right. It could be wrong to you, but unless you can list facts to show how someone is wrong, you're just saying your opinion is right, theirs is wrong.
{continued due to word character limits)
|
08-21-09 12:41pm
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#32
from exotics4me:
(asmith12's Reply)
Well, counsel, just as you suspected, huh? Like I've said before, you're always right. Of course, the link doesn't work and if you missed it in the previous post, my whole purpose of pointing out the false claims was to show you what a hypocrite you are. Now, I can show you what a know-it-all you are. I'll be happy to apologize to the site. Most likely, I saw the words "brutal head-scissors" on another page in the tour, as I said earlier, I had to clear my cookies to get back to that page which shows I had been beyond that page.
An apology to you? For what? The "allegation" wasn't against you. It was against the site. Unless you do work for the site. I see no reason that the allegation pertained to you. You've dodged everything else in this. You've talked in wannabe lawyer jargon, up until now. I never said you worked for the site. I simply said I've never seen a customer defend a group of sites like you do. You like to argue the meanings of things and you can figure out how to twist that into me saying you worked for these sites.
You're not touching the rest of it though? The parts about how you are a hypocrite. And how you have tried this twice with me now. As I told you before when you changed your trust rating to yes, I didn't care if you did it or not. I don't care if you change it back now to no. I just don't like someone singling me out to try and prove themselves right against me when we're just talking about opinions here. And that was the second time. It makes probably the 4th time by other members. I told them the same thing I will tell you. If you don't like my opinion and you're going to dodge any debate that comes from it, then don't reply to me. Your request of an apology on a site that you are anonymous on is hysterical.
But it is as simple as I said. Don't reply to me if you're planning to try and change my opinion, tell me how my opinion is wrong because you know everything and understand everything better than everyone else does or else, you're going to have another situation just like this one. If you want to reply and say, "I disagree because..." and it doesn't include anything about you being right, we'll be fine and can forget this, if not that's fine too. Just don't expect apologies from me when you replied to me to tell me that my opinion was wrong.
|
08-20-09 12:28pm
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#31
from exotics4me:
(asmith12's Reply)
I'll get to the other one in a minute. There are some things you don't seem to understand. I first brought Ultimate Surrender up with this line "If you really are holding sites to truth in advertising, then you might want to reconsider that one." Because you were lecturing on truth in advertising, yet your #1 site had multiple false statements on it. You were being a hypocrite.
As for me questioning you about your relationship with kink.com, I said, "It sounds like you are part of the kink.com family because you defend them". Now you tell me, a member has 3 of their top 4 sites from one company. And your last contact with me before this incident was when you went off about me dropping 20 points from a kink.com website because they had a 10 GB per MONTH DL Limit. You were so adamant in their defense that you gave me my only no trust vote. You've since changed it to yes, but that was how much that deduction bothered you. And you've since posted a comment asking about why a kink.com site's score is not listed as high as you thought it should be. That sounds more like an employee than a customer to me.
Moving on, to have any kind of real violence against another human, without facing charges, you have to have sanctioning. Like the UFC has, they worked for years on getting sanctioning, they had to ban headbutts, groin strikes and a dozen other moves. Or they could have taken the WWE route and said it is staged or scripted. Or else, their fighters would be jailed for assault charges. Same thing against the Jerry Springer show and its fights. Which he admitted were staged and scripted. I know good and damn well if the UFC can't allow groin strikes that Ultimate Submission cannot allow sexual penetration during what they call a "unscripted match" without sanctioning.
A reality of real fighting/wrestling is that you are trying to injure the other person or else, they injure you. I wouldn't say WWE is anymore scripted, they've had performers end up paralyzed. But you see, my problem wasn't with Ultimate Submission. My problem was with you being a hypocrite. WWE is not "real" wrestling. WEC, K-1, UFC, those are the real wrestling events I was referring to. And you remember, it is just me showing you that you were supporting a site that did exactly opposite of what you believe in. That is what you should expect anytime you try to persuade another adult to believe like you.
I could give a damn about the 2 to 1 ratio. Do you follow polls and base your beliefs on the majority vote? I make up my own mind. Even then, I'm also not going to try and tell you to make up your own mind. I could care less if you follow the majority. I'm not here to persuade anyone. On that note, I'm not going to respond kindly to people who try to persuade me either.
|
08-20-09 10:31am
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#29
from exotics4me:
(asmith12's Reply)
I don't think you understand that I consider "teen" a genre and not a number. When used in context with adult sites. You can look at most sites with Teen in their name and see something like this, "The #1 Teen Site". Just like you can look at an interracial site that says, "The #1 Interracial Site."
I don't know why you are saying "exactly" on the monitor part. Those numbers 17 and 15 were specific, when you find a site that says, "18 and 19 year old models only" then I will say that they are wrong for saying those specifics and not sticking within in them. Until then "teen" is not defined in the porn world.
I didn't say German could effect English ads. I said people from those countries could live under different laws about what age defines a legal age, meaning 18 and 19 could be illegal in some countries.
What gets me is this, "I don't know and don't care." About mature porn. Yet, you hope others are reading this and can see that I'm impossible to persuade?
That might be the worst thing anyone has said to me on here. Maybe I haven't made myself clear. I bring my own opinion, from my own mind. I don't say anything to make anyone else happy. I've been this way since I joined and I'm not changing. That is part of life that I enjoy called having my own opinion. I don't need you to persuade me. How highly must one think of themselves to think their opinion is so much better than others that they should persuade others to think like them? Just don't hold your breath on that one. It would be like a brutal head-scissors effect.
As for where it was changed, you probably need to clear your cookies to get the Click yes if over 18 to enter. The changed part is in the last paragraph, "Female wrestling holds on UltimateSurrender.com include severe leg scissors, head scissors, boston crab, back breaker, full nelson, grapevine and more. Enjoy women in bondage photos, movies, streaming video, and shoots you can buy at UltimateSurrender.com!"
|
08-20-09 08:34am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from exotics4me:
(asmith12's Reply)
I've had one other long drawn-out mostly pointless debate with you on here before and in it, I mentioned that you sounded like you were part of the kink.com family. The way you defend them and so on.
So, tell me, why is it that their main page for Ultimate Submission changed the wording over the last 24 hours? It changed from "Brutal leg-scissors" to "Severe leg-scissors". Not that severe is any better, since you like in context discussions. A severe leg-scissors would mean lots of pressure being applied. Like if you went outside and it was hot. You would say the heat is severe today.
You then say this about the 3 tags, "Nope. Per their rules, 3 tags per round are only ALLOWED for each of competing teams to be exercised (and they USUALLY happen, as they're very beneficial for the team), but are not required." Their site clearly says, "The rules are set. There are three tags per team per round and three 12 minute non-scripted wrestling rounds."
There is nothing there about three tags not being required. So, either way, they are being dishonest. I could have my hope up that each team would tag 3 times and the front page says that, but you say it isn't true.
As far as it not being scripted, you really should think about that before saying it. IF ultimate submission is not scripted, they would be in jail. In the world of REAL wrestling, if one wrestler popped a finger in the other wrestler's ass, that would be molestation/sexual assault. That is where they stretch the truth a bit, by saying, "REAL" wrestling. There is no such thing as sex in a real sport. You don't see players blowing each other during timeouts. Also, backbreaker, Boston Crab, moves they list, are not REAL wrestling moves. You cannot do a move intended to break a person's back. Now, if this is true, that these moves are not done with the intention of hurting each other or winning the match, then it is scripted. Which makes "unscripted" a lie. If those moves are intended to hurt each other, then the authorities should have already looked into it. Especially seeing that a man stands there as the "referee" while another videotapes, and the ref assists at times in the assault.
My whole point in all this, including Ultimate Submission, is that porn is a perceived fantasy. If you don't believe that, I recommend watching WWE and betting on the matches. Or watching Jerry Springer. And remember, Ultimate Submission claims "unscripted". Gay models aren't always gay. Mature models are only mature based on the viewer's age.
|
08-20-09 03:58am
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from exotics4me:
(asmith12's Reply)
I may have to use two replies for this. First of all, tell me what the word in front of "model" is. Teen Models, Gay Models, Lesbian Models, Mature Models and lets say Transsexual Models? The word in front is the adjective that separates the models based on actions/age and look perception. None of those other adjectives are specific though. Mature is an age/look perception one. But no one has defined what is and what isn't a mature model. Why would teen be any different? When anyone who has surfed porn for even a relatively short time goes to a site, say like, Teen Dreams, they know there are models that are not 18 and 19. If the don't, all they have to do is preview the site and can see Sophie Moone (28), Eve Angel (26) just to name two. How is that site misleading or even wrong? Does a site stop putting new content of member favorites like Sophie and Eve up, just because they are no longer 18 or 19? And anyway, what adjective comes after "mature"?
Your monitor example did nothing but strengthen what I said. They said their monitors were 17 inches, but the viewable area was only 15.8 inches. That is specific. Just like if a site was named 18and19yearoldmodels would be. If the monitor company had said, "Big monitor". There wouldn't be a problem. In porn, no genre, is age defined, unless the site defines the word teen or mature or as in the case of Allover30. Teen is no different than MILF, Mature, Lesbian, Gay. Sure, they could go re-program their site and put youngermodels dreams as the name, but it would then be subjective since you would say, "28 is not really a younger model...to me". What would be the point then of doing all of that reprogramming to only give those few complaining, something new to bitch about?
The definitions I used were relevant in the discussion, as it showed that the word Teen does have definitions in different languages that mean a time of life. As in adolescent and juvenile. The actual numbers 18 and 19 are irrelevant since neither 18 nor 19 are the legal age in some countries/cities/states.
I'm going to end this one with the lead-in of the next one. You really believe "brutal" means hot and innovative? There is no definition in this world that lists brutal as those things. You can give me that bullshit about it is up to the ad writer's understanding of the word, but that is hypocritical since you are making "teen" be defined "correctly". Look up bullshit and you'll see a picture of that belief. Scroll down.
|
08-20-09 03:38am
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from exotics4me:
(asmith12's Reply)
Honestly, I have no idea what the first half of your post is saying. I felt like I used the correct contextual definitions, and have no idea how archaic "One which preserves meaning" would have to do with an age/perception question. I never said 18-19 means teen models. I said if the sites got together and defined teen as 18-19 year old models, there would be a possibility of fraud. As it stands now, there is no clear definition of "teen" model. Let me show you a few examples. Lesbian porn. No one is complaining that those women aren't lesbians. Gay porn, from what I've read, a good portion of those men are straight in real-life. Heterosexual porn, we know that many of those men are at least bi-sexual as are the women. Nobody has a problem with those. Teen to me has always meant the younger models, usually solo masturbation to show their perceived innocence. It is an age/look perception.
Think about something, your favorite site is Ultimate Submission. If you really are holding sites to truth in advertising, then you might want to reconsider that one. They advertise brutal leg scissors. Brutal leg scissors on the body or neck would cause serious damage. Broken larynx, broken ribs, the girls would be puking. And in my 20+ years of Lua/grappling, I was never taught the dreaded nipple twister or the pussy grind aided face sit or the 3 finger jammer-slammer. They also advertise "unscripted" then say "3 tags per round" in the tag team matches. That's scripted! If they were really wrestling, one could lock a brutal leg scissor on and hold the opponent in one spot until she was unconscious. Perception/fantasy is the rule in porn, always has been.
|
08-19-09 04:52am
|
Reply
69
|
3D Sex Games
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from dracken:
Very interesting concept for a porn website and while 3D sex isn't my thing the ability to customize stuff makes this site sound interesting. thank you for pointing it out and thank you for a great review.
|
08-16-09 06:07am
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from pat362:
(asmith12's Reply)
You might be right about Pam's sex tape, but we know that Paris Hilton's sex tape was all her doing. I guess that may be where the term fame whore comes from. To release a sex tape so that you can be famous is rather pathetic.
|
06-28-09 06:43pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from pat362:
(asmith12's Reply)
You have a point with Pamela and I'd even add Miss Hilton. Paris was a nobody before that tape. She was everywhere after that. I still think that it's a bad idea because it can backfire on you. Pamela was already a Playmate so everyone had seen her naked. I may be wrong but I suspect that Pamela would have a hard time getting jobs on netwrok TV after the incident. Publicity is good but if you happen to be a younger clean cut actress than a sex tape may kill off your chanes at getting more jobs.
I guess the bottom line is that you should make sure that you keep all copies of the sex tape and then you can make a deal on it. This way you can't blame an ex boyfriend for releasing it at a time when you are trying to get a specific role.
|
06-26-09 06:30pm
|
Reply
72
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(asmith12's Reply)
Hey, sorry - I misunderstood that..but BTW - I certainly agree about the whole DVD-industry - and the state it's in...Cheers!
|
06-24-09 08:24am
|
Reply
73
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Kedra:
(asmith12's Reply)
LOL No sarcasm intended at all, asmith. I was completely serious.
This is a learning experience for me, through and through.
Yes, I've been in this biz for a long time, but I've never done a content site. I've never been a webmaster, had to advertise, been "my boss", or any of the other things that are going along with this new adventure.
When I listed as an amateur site, I wasn't joking. Hell, all I've ever HAD to do was interact with my friends and play with my toys. LOL All of this is new to me and I am picking everything up as I go. You guys helping me to get a better idea of what happens here...is fantastic, IMHO.
mbaya, I appreciate your reply, too. I will remember, in the future, to ask my members to stop by and leave their comments, not necessarily post a review. Thank you for taking the time to add to your original comment.
As for your request for more info...I haven't made any response to that yet because I really wasn't sure if I should. The site is about me and that's what you will see. Pix of me playing with my toys and being silly with the camera. Me, experimenting with fetishes that I've learned about as well as those that I enjoy. Videos of everything from me masturbating in the shower to making out in the park with a girlfriend. I've never been on cam with a man and I don't know if that will be an addition later on or not. I'm still thinking about it. Both the free blog (linked in the tour) and the member blog are updated on a regular basis, though I do add more to the member blog and more often. I have just added free, anything goes, live shows for my members and custom videos/pic sets for those who have something specific that they would like me to shoot.
Let's see...quality...I usually shoot with an HD video camera, though some of the vids have been resized to standard because of additional non-hd cams being used for different angles. I'm also working on switching all of the vids over to H.264 Flash files, again...issues with the CMS making that difficult, but I'm working on it and trying to learn a new one so that I can switch the entire site over soon.
All of the pix are done in high res and I do have those sets available in larger sizes than the display sets online, for those who request them. The only photo-shopping I do is to add my watermarks, resize for upload and brighten up some dark ones, for the sets.
I do try to add content once a week, though I shoot and edit all of my own stuff, so some weeks there are more additions than others. Umm...anything else you'd like to know, from my side? Feel free to ask.
Wow this got long! I'll shut up now!
Thanks again for the great feedback guys!!!
|
06-18-09 07:10am
|
Reply
74
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Kedra:
(asmith12's Reply)
Ok, now you guys have turned me all blushy and speechless, toe draggin in the sand kinda thing.
I want to say thank you to everyone who has posted...for not only making me see things in a different light, but also for giving me the chance to explain where I'm coming from and actually taking the time to read through my responses and not just blowing me off.
When I saw the first user review, I fully expected some flaming. I didn't expect anyone to take Me seriously when I explained my position, though. Too much time on some of those webmaster boards, I guess.
Thank you guys.
I'm really glad that I put the site up for review and that you guys have been so supportive in explaining to me why you expressed your concern/disbelief at the user reviews already posted. You guys are teaching ME a lot in a very short time. I really do appreciate it.
You guys RAWK!!!
|
06-17-09 08:01am
|
Reply
75
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Xororos:
(asmith12's Reply)
It's probably the style of sites that I join. Mostly very erotic/softcore/photography websites. I've never joined a hardcore site or anything too extreme. That could be the difference. I guess FTV gave me a pre-checked trial, but man . . . that's the last I remember and that was two years ago. Epoch might be the deal. I've used them maybe once. It's almost always ccbill for me.
|
06-03-09 09:59am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
