| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(asmith12's Reply)
Here I go again, with the same evil smile on my face.
A good content production team? Anyone paying attention to my rants against this site will know I'm no fan. So, to make sure it isn't just my disdain for the site, I just looked at the reviews on here. Almost every review, even the best of 'em, cites video quality as a con and most mention repetitive content. That doesn't do anything but reinforce my opinion that this site is nothing but marketing.
Their marketing tactics will only backfire when people wake up and see what they're really getting for the low initial cost of admission. I was actually a member here once and I wouldn't give 50¢ for all the lackluster content I saw. Subsequent reviews tell me it hasn't changed all that much, except for the HD video you have to wait six months for.
Personally, I don't like dealing with a site that seems to come up with a new money-grubbing scheme every month or so, and I'll never understand why others do.
|
09-11-09 08:04pm
|
Reply
127
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
It never ceases to amaze me how many ways this site comes up with to make money. And yet, they must be doing something right - people keep going back.
The Rage continues...
|
09-10-09 08:55am
|
Reply
128
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from apoctom:
I agree with your bottom line: don't care about pricing. $40 a month is too much for me and I think for most people, given the earlier poll question results.
Thanks for the review.
|
10-17-07 08:28am
|
Reply
129
|
Diabolic
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from DiacolicChris:
This is called a cross sale, and it's a special offer on the signup page, if you don't want it just uncheck the box, it very clear and not misleading at any point. The word "Swindling" in over the top for sure, as this practice is used on most all big websites to offer other sites at the point of sale.
Diabolic.com Webmaster
|
01-09-08 09:25am
|
Reply
130
|
Digamour
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(asmith12's Reply)
That's something we take care of from our end. Often, we'll pull the remarks by that users but in cases where it'll disrupt a thread, we'll generally leave them but add a note like the above.
|
04-03-09 04:54am
|
Reply
131
|
Digamour
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(asmith12's Reply)
note that we show that user muglore shares a computer with the registered webmaster for this site.
|
03-12-09 03:33pm
|
Reply
132
|
Digamour
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from muglore:
I've just downloaded an update to Digamour and they added a 3D city that you can explore with your character and adjusted the XP level settings like you suggested. You might want to give this game another try it's much better now!
|
11-05-08 05:01pm
|
Reply
133
|
Digamour
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from roseman:
Good review, thanks for the info.
|
09-25-08 12:46am
|
Reply
134
|
Dirty Babysitter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(asmith12's Reply)
They are scenes taken from their library, but if you enjoy what they offer and can dowload them to you computer. Then that's great. I can't complain because they don't advertise the exclusiveness of their stuff. On a side note. I notice the joining price is almost 30$, but if you press the back button it opens a special 19.95$ price for a 20 days membership.
|
12-20-07 08:03pm
|
Reply
135
|
Eyes On The Straight Guy
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Khan:
I've passed this to the TBP Editors
Thx for the heads up
|
11-17-07 05:29am
|
Reply
136
|
Femdom Time
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from SnowDude:
(asmith12's Reply)
Thanks much for the recommendations dude! I'll check them out and let you know what I think. Many thanks for thinking of my niches! :)
|
10-30-07 12:57pm
|
Reply
137
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from messmer:
Great review is right! I, too, liked the comparison with MetArt and you did me a great personal favor by mentioning "clothing and undressing." I can't stand picture sets or videos without that progression so I know where I will go when the time comes.
|
10-02-08 05:23pm
|
Reply
138
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from TheRizzo:
Great review and I appreciate the contrast with Met Art. I actually really like Femjoy myself when I have been a member. You are correct they seem to get more passion from their models.
|
10-01-08 11:30am
|
Reply
139
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Khan:
>> PU admins, is there any chance to change it?
We could but it wouldn't make much difference. Because of the layout of their home page (a large photo at the top of the page) the new screen cap would be virtually the same as this one just with a different picture. Our screen caps basically take a snap-shot of what is "above the fold" (one screen full).
FEMJOY changes the picture at the top of their home page fairly often. Still, the screen cap we have is representative of what one will find when visiting the site.
|
10-01-08 06:26am
|
Reply
140
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from lolo:
Chanta Rose is the founder of Twisted Factory...you may know of her from Kink where she ran and Dommed for several sites there including Whippedass for many years. I don't know the full story (I read her blog) but basically she was fired from Kink a couple of years back over some crap and she started this company, which is probably why things look similar. She is also married to the creator of Sex & Submission.
|
04-24-08 10:58pm
|
Reply
141
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from cerebral:
(asmith12's Reply)
You are right on target. A few of the older segments are really very good, but the quality of the videos is not very good. Too bad the downloading issues have not been resolved.
|
02-23-08 11:07am
|
Reply
142
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from cerebral:
Very thoughtful review, with important comparisons noted. Like the attention to detail in this review.
Relationship to sister sites is important, as they share facilities, photographers and models.
Overall, a valuable review.
|
12-16-07 11:45am
|
Reply
143
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
You used to see the fake bondage where the girl would hold her ankles but there were no implements of restraint.
|
11-01-07 07:53pm
|
Reply
144
|
Fucked And Bound
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from jd1961:
I notice the cute little disclaimer at the end of the preview video, but I was under the impression that bondage with intercourse on video was illegal in the US? Maybe this has changed without me looking.
|
11-01-07 01:06pm
|
Reply
145
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from three3:
I just joined this site and I think this is a very fair review!
|
05-28-11 05:05pm
|
Reply
146
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from FuckingGambler:
(asmith12's Reply)
Thank you very much for your comment, we really appreciate detailed analysis (and are really happy that you like it).
We are also indeed planning adding printable labels at some point in the future, "behind the scenes" stuff is more difficult to produce, but is possible too. What is indeed very difficult is to achieve Hollywood-like quality without increasing the size, but with improvements in codecs even this might become possible some day :).
|
04-29-11 02:24am
|
Reply
147
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment from asmith12:
FWIW, here goes my report. I've downloaded all three of their samples (200M to 900M in size), and burned them on my external LG Blu-ray burner to BD-RE disc (burning took like three clicks on my Windows 7 after downloading). All three played on my Sony player without problems, menus worked and so on. I felt that quality of the smallest sample was similar to DVD, medium one felt better than DVD, and largest one was almost like medium one, better than DVDs, but a bit worse than high-end Hollywood Blu-ray movies (it is apples and oranges, but I think it still cannot compete with titles like Sherlock).
I've decided that medium quality is the best for me (almost the same quality as high-end one but much smaller), and downloaded the whole Game 26. It took 8G for a 3 hour movie, and I think it was well worth waiting. I indeed enjoyed watching it not in front of monitor, but on a large TV screen in my bedroom (BTW, my g/f liked it too, and I will not elaborate on what happened during watching ;) ).
Pros: can watch on TV, high quality, funny menu, convenient menu structure, "Action Only" option is interesting
Cons: relatively large (medium quality is comparable to 6MBit/s clips), extras are rather basic
Things I'd like to be added/improved: printable label, quality to beat Hollywood while keeping the size (I know it is not realistic, but can't I dream a bit? ;) ), "behind the scenes" stuff and model bios in extras
Bottom line: for me, "Medium Quality Blu-ray ISO" is a clear winner over 6MBit/s and 12MBit/s clips: it is the same quality as 12MBit/s at size of 6Mbit/s, can be watched on TV, and has funny menus. If you guys will add more extra features - it will be even better, but even now it is certainly the best adult movie I've ever seen (even before taking into account the price).
|
04-28-11 09:21pm
|
Reply
148
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from FuckingGambler:
Thank you for commenting on this sensitive issue, asmith. In reply to your comment on "not all the games are made equal" I would like to confirm that it is indeed the case. What our producers are doing is gathering several models in a certain environment and asking them to play The Game. This process is as "real" as we can possibly get (we call it "ultra-reality"), and it also implies that, as with real people, player personalities either "click", or do not "click". Nobody can predict it in advance, and my personal opinion is that this uncertainty even adds to the "realistic" feeling when viewing a new game.
|
02-23-10 09:20pm
|
Reply
149
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from FuckingGambler:
Thank you very much for your detailed review, and we obviously appreciate high rating you have given to our site.
We also want to comment on your concern about reliability of our "witness" program, and reassure you and all PornUser members that we are committed to this concept, and that at least one of our members (paying or free) will be invited to shooting in April in Budapest. Of course, we cannot guarantee that it will be you who will win the draw, but what we can guarantee is fair handling of the draw, with all our employees and affiliates being excluded.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask them here, or in our forums, or via e-mail to support@fuckinggamble.com .
|
02-02-10 10:14pm
|
Reply
150
|
Fucking Gamble
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Capn:
Yes, that is an interesting review of a very specific site.
If you are into games did you see my assessment of Virtual Fem recently?
|
02-02-10 03:44pm
|
