| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
I'll try this one more time...Authentic Japanese erotica is what you would view if you lived in Japan. It is what it is. All the best girls are in authentic Japanese erotica. If you were Japanese and lived in Japan, this would be your porn. This is a site that provides authentic Japanese porn. If you do not like authentic Japanese porn, don't join. If you like authentic Japanese porn, this is the best site I have seen.
|
12-13-07 08:52pm
|
Reply
177
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
That's fine that you don't like mosaics, I don't like lesbianism. But if I review a lesbian site, I'm not going to give it a negative because it has lesbianism in it !
|
12-13-07 05:31am
|
Reply
178
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
Exactly....Japanese are blocked from such sites. This site provides authentic Japanese porn, which is censored. You can't give a negative for what is. It would be like reviewing a BJ site, and giving it a negative for only having BJ's. That would be illogical.
|
12-13-07 05:26am
|
Reply
179
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(asmith12's Reply)
I guess for the genitally obsessed, this would not be a good site. But my point is, it can't be counted as a minus, because it is the law. That's the culture, that's what you are getting here, it deserves respect for what it is. Material such as you mention, if produced in Japan, is a crime.
|
12-12-07 01:23pm
|
Reply
180
|
Jerk-Off Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Khan:
FOLLOWUP:
These have now been added.
See
Small Tits Hunter
https://www.pornusers.com/review/smalltitshunter/
and
White Box Black Cocks
https://www.pornusers.com/review/whiteboxblackcocks/
|
12-15-07 02:47pm
|
Reply
181
|
Jerk-Off Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Khan:
I've asked the tech folks to look into this one. Hopefully, they'll get it fixed in just a bit.
Thx for the heads up
|
12-15-07 07:06am
|
Reply
182
|
Jerk-Off Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Khan:
I've passed this over to the TBP Editors. They should have them added w/in the next few days.
Thx for the heads up.
|
12-15-07 05:29am
|
Reply
183
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Kedra:
(asmith12's Reply)
LOL No sarcasm intended at all, asmith. I was completely serious.
This is a learning experience for me, through and through.
Yes, I've been in this biz for a long time, but I've never done a content site. I've never been a webmaster, had to advertise, been "my boss", or any of the other things that are going along with this new adventure.
When I listed as an amateur site, I wasn't joking. Hell, all I've ever HAD to do was interact with my friends and play with my toys. LOL All of this is new to me and I am picking everything up as I go. You guys helping me to get a better idea of what happens here...is fantastic, IMHO.
mbaya, I appreciate your reply, too. I will remember, in the future, to ask my members to stop by and leave their comments, not necessarily post a review. Thank you for taking the time to add to your original comment.
As for your request for more info...I haven't made any response to that yet because I really wasn't sure if I should. The site is about me and that's what you will see. Pix of me playing with my toys and being silly with the camera. Me, experimenting with fetishes that I've learned about as well as those that I enjoy. Videos of everything from me masturbating in the shower to making out in the park with a girlfriend. I've never been on cam with a man and I don't know if that will be an addition later on or not. I'm still thinking about it. Both the free blog (linked in the tour) and the member blog are updated on a regular basis, though I do add more to the member blog and more often. I have just added free, anything goes, live shows for my members and custom videos/pic sets for those who have something specific that they would like me to shoot.
Let's see...quality...I usually shoot with an HD video camera, though some of the vids have been resized to standard because of additional non-hd cams being used for different angles. I'm also working on switching all of the vids over to H.264 Flash files, again...issues with the CMS making that difficult, but I'm working on it and trying to learn a new one so that I can switch the entire site over soon.
All of the pix are done in high res and I do have those sets available in larger sizes than the display sets online, for those who request them. The only photo-shopping I do is to add my watermarks, resize for upload and brighten up some dark ones, for the sets.
I do try to add content once a week, though I shoot and edit all of my own stuff, so some weeks there are more additions than others. Umm...anything else you'd like to know, from my side? Feel free to ask.
Wow this got long! I'll shut up now!
Thanks again for the great feedback guys!!!
|
06-18-09 07:10am
|
Reply
184
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Kedra:
(asmith12's Reply)
Ok, now you guys have turned me all blushy and speechless, toe draggin in the sand kinda thing.
I want to say thank you to everyone who has posted...for not only making me see things in a different light, but also for giving me the chance to explain where I'm coming from and actually taking the time to read through my responses and not just blowing me off.
When I saw the first user review, I fully expected some flaming. I didn't expect anyone to take Me seriously when I explained my position, though. Too much time on some of those webmaster boards, I guess.
Thank you guys.
I'm really glad that I put the site up for review and that you guys have been so supportive in explaining to me why you expressed your concern/disbelief at the user reviews already posted. You guys are teaching ME a lot in a very short time. I really do appreciate it.
You guys RAWK!!!
|
06-17-09 08:01am
|
Reply
185
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from elephant:
Doesn't look like prices ever much improved here. Wow just discovered the site, I thought my eyes were deceiving me with the prices. If you do a site like this which could be a good idea if relatively cheapish scenes for those who like a model and want to purchase a scene but at these prices you really might as well subscribe for a little more and get all or give a miss.
|
03-27-11 09:03am
|
Reply
186
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Ergo Proxy:
I perfectly agree with you.
Some time ago I contacted KINK.com in order to offer something like this. My problem was that I liked one or another movie but paying for a membership was a bit too pricy. This is the worst solution they could have come up with. Ridiculous pricing and only old movies.
It's like a time travel into the ancient past of internet.
|
04-27-08 02:41am
|
Reply
187
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from JBDICK:
thanks for pointing this one out...asmith12
crazy...I remember seeing this type of payment model 10 years ago on sites like suze randall, and for a while ALS used to do this. Madness. Actually...this is the cyberspace equivalent of Self harming/Suicide
I wont be paying those kind of prices...
|
04-25-08 10:49am
|
Reply
188
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from marcdc1:
Gil (her real name) stopped doing femdom a little while ago saying that she wanted to focus on what she wants instead of what others want her to do. Essentially she's arrived at a point in her life where she's only doing what SHE wants. So think of the whole site as femdom - she's only get her rocks off and to hell with you if you don't like it scum. (just kidding). I say good for her the site is still really hot - but -
you're right it shouldn't be labeled femdom anymore.
|
07-26-12 11:03am
|
Reply
189
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(asmith12's Reply)
You're right about the kind of stuff that's not easy to find anywhere else - and some of these mature women here are quite sexy - in many ways.
|
10-31-07 09:00am
|
Reply
190
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Denner:
Great review, thanks
Seen 5-6 of the videos from the site and thought about joining - but I guess you're also right about the repetitive....and the price.
|
10-31-07 08:47am
|
Reply
191
|
Lady Sonia
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Getreal:
I agree, I checked it out but never joined. I looked expensive with limited content.
|
10-30-07 08:07am
|
Reply
192
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from kkman112:
I've known it was a Clips4Sale (C4S) resell. I have been following LostBets.com (just a redirect for the C4S store) for a while. It is not produced by the Lost Bets production people, but they know of / approve of that site. Though it is odd that they are only offering lower quality video when at least most of the videos in the C4S store are available in HD.
|
02-13-10 03:12am
|
Reply
193
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(asmith12's Reply)
As I understand it, the producer of the content was approached by a 3rd party to lease the older content for the pay site you reviewed.
The producer uses his more recent content in a Clips4Sale store.
So if you want the current material it is Clips4Sale.
Archive stuff is leased to the paysite.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-02-10 11:34pm
|
Reply
194
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(asmith12's Reply)
Well, it is exclusive in the sense that it licensed from the producer.
I don't know if that older material is still available from the producer's Clips4Sale store though.
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-02-10 09:08am
|
Reply
195
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Capn:
I know a little background to this.
The membership site is licensed older material from LostBets.com Clips4Sale site.
That would explain why it is not up to current standards.
That said I do not know how good the more modern stuff is because I think the Clips4Sale prices are far too salty!
Cap'n. :0(
|
02-01-10 11:35am
|
Reply
196
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Xororos:
(asmith12's Reply)
It's probably the style of sites that I join. Mostly very erotic/softcore/photography websites. I've never joined a hardcore site or anything too extreme. That could be the difference. I guess FTV gave me a pre-checked trial, but man . . . that's the last I remember and that was two years ago. Epoch might be the deal. I've used them maybe once. It's almost always ccbill for me.
|
06-03-09 09:59am
|
Reply
197
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Xororos:
(asmith12's Reply)
>Well, I understand your point, but on the other hand I see LOTS of MUCH MORE
>deceptive practices (like PRE-CHECKED "trials" with outrageous renewal rates when
>subscribing)
Well, you've got me there! Any site that includes pre-checked trials is not cool. Again, I think we've had very different experiences. Until M&B, I had never joined a site with a pre-checked trial or anything like it. I'm aware that stuff like that is out there, but I've never joined a site like that.
Maybe it was a combination of the pre-checked trial they tried to get me to accept, or the really patronizing email from the support staff that treated me like I was an idiot who never joined an adult site before, or the trial that was so severely limited that it was almost useless - whatever the reason, I got a very negative impression of M&B and I can't recommend it to anyone.
Sites like that make me really appreciate the ones who do it well in a straightforward and direct manner.
|
06-02-09 12:41pm
|
Reply
198
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Xororos:
(asmith12's Reply)
Yeah, we're officially arguing semantics :)
>> wrongful deception intended to result in financial gain.
>Come on, $2 or so they're getting is not really a financial gain (they're paying almost all >of it or even more for the transaction itself).
The financial gain isn't from the $3.95 trial, but from the full subscription that kicks in after 24 hours. It's merely a ploy to hook you. It's a classic bait and switch, which results in them being *that* much more likely to get you to sign on for the full subscription.
Moreover, it's a matter of principal. There is absolutely no reason that they shouldn't be up-front about the whole thing. If I knew I was getting a limited trial, I probably would have tried it anyway. It just annoys me, you know?
I understand that you're playing devil's advocate in regards to what a "trial" is. Perhaps the word "trial" outside of the adult industry has a different meaning, but what does that matter? We're not outside of the adult industry. The bottom line for me is, I've done a lot of trials and the ones that are limited tell me so, so I expect that. You can say it's redundant, but we clearly have different expectations for trials. I consider a trial to be limited to length of subscription only.
I don't think we're going to come to an agreement, but it's a fun conversation, especially since the subject is porn :-)
|
06-02-09 12:01am
|
Reply
199
|
Mac and Bumble
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Xororos:
(asmith12's Reply)
asmith12:
Thanks for the comment. I think Fraud is warranted when you make every effort to discover the nature of what you're about to purchase and you find that you've purchased something else entirely. The vast majority of trial subscriptions I've purchased have all been full trials.
I'm thinking of rookiebabe, daisybeach, nakedhappygirls, perfect10, changeroomhunters, alyssadoll, rayspade, justnude, and countless others.
It doesn't really matter what you're buying, the company has a duty to tell you what to expect. In my book, when you go above and beyond a standard level of buying research (e.g. reading the fine print), and you STILL are given no indication, that matches the definition of fraud in my dictionary: wrongful deception intended to result in financial gain.
We're probably just arguing semantics and, like you, I'm okay if a site has a limited trial, but they usually tell you up front that it's limited. M&B did not.
|
06-01-09 09:49am
|
Reply
200
|
Mature Toilet Sluts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Toadsith:
(asmith12's Reply)
That would indeed be wise :-) Though you might be surprised the terms and conditions you have inadvertently agreed to in the past. Sometimes it requires as little acknowledgment as taking the document into your possession. Trains were covering all kinds of crazy conditions by just printing them very small on the train ticket and stating that by taking the ticket you agreed to the conditions. I think in the end they got in trouble for that, but it worked for a while, lol
|
05-16-08 03:48pm
|
