| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
201
|
Mature Toilet Sluts
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Goldfish:
asmith. I understand what you're doing but doesn't it make more sense to give us your experiences with five or ten sites you've actually joined? I believe that's the point of the poll. Besides, if there is disclosure of elements in the site that you may not like in the free area or the terms and conditions, isn't that ethical business practice? I think it is.
|
05-16-08 04:31am
|
Reply
202
|
Mature Toilet Sluts
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from Toadsith:
I don't usually read the Terms and Conditions but I'll bet this isn't all that uncommon. In business in general it is common practice to reserve as many rights as you can think of with no concern as to if it will or will not hold up in the court of law. If you had it written down in the first place it can do nothing other than help you. So they write it down and hope for the best. If you check the policies of many companies outside this industry you'll find the same thing. The company I work for reserves everything excluding possibly enslaving your offspring to pay off debts incurred. Though we might have an addendum that covers that.
|
05-16-08 12:05am
|
Reply
203
|
Max Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from apoctom:
(asmith12's Reply)
I use Internet Download Manager. I have found it to be the easiest to use and configure for things like site passwords or which folder to download to.
The big downside is that it is not free. It's 29.95, but has a 30-day trial for you to see if you like it.
I think the most popular DL manager is Flashget, but I didn't care for the interface or the ads in the free version that I used.
Hope this helps.
|
10-31-07 10:15am
|
Reply
204
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(asmith12's Reply)
IMHO, personal taste varies, which is part of what makes it personal. :)
One problem with Playboy, for me, is the models use too much silicone for the boob jobs (or maybe it's saline, for some of them).
|
11-02-09 08:28am
|
Reply
205
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#20
from hondaman:
(asmith12's Reply)
Yeah that is your op but simply because I am new to this site doesnt me I dont have good analytical skills and by trade I am a homicide cop been doing that specific feild since 2005 been a cop by trade since I was 19 years old when I joined the Air Force and been a civilian cop since I got out so I have 9 years in a job that requires attention to detail and honesty to the law to the utmost and one that requires 0 mistakes in filing your work one error or case of dishonesty on my behalf and a gulity person can walk free.
|
11-15-08 03:58pm
|
Reply
206
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from hondaman:
(asmith12's Reply)
So why do you target me for my score when there a few people below me that have given a pretty high score then? Why do question my thoughts but you dont question theirs?
|
11-15-08 02:05pm
|
Reply
207
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from PinkPanther:
(asmith12's Reply)
I don't think it's suspicious when someone starts their posting career at PU giving the highest ratings ever - probably because that's what I did. I started posting in order to let people here know about the sites that I thought were the best around - and I think all of my first reviews were in the 90's as a result.
I think it's the case that most people start posting here because they're passionate in one direction or another - they're either excited to let people know about the sites they think are fantastic or they've been burned by a site and they want to let people here know that was the case.
We need to give newbie posters a break - if they stick around a while, they'll probably settle down and be more moderate in their ratings.
Met Art deserves high praise - they're one of the most consistent, professional, generous sites around and if you like soft erotic photography, they are a truly great site.
|
11-14-08 07:23pm
|
Reply
208
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from hondaman:
(asmith12's Reply)
Yes you got me I am really a computer at NORAD and soon I will take over the world Skynet.In all seriousness you cant really tell if any person on this site is honest or not I have the right to put out my opnion about a site just cause you dont agree with my score dosent mean that I am lying it not like this is some double blind study varifed one down side of the web as a whole is that any person can really say anything anywhere and have no real proof that they are right or even know what they are talking about. I could care less about if someone doesnt like a site as much as I do.
|
11-14-08 05:00pm
|
Reply
209
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Denner:
(asmith12's Reply)
Yup, agree - but, man, we've seen so many other new PUs doing 99 or 100 without any serious arguments - just la,la,la...
I think hondaman done some fine things here after all - you remember how difficuelt it was in the start - I do anyway and got scorned a few times.
If a new PU shows some serious signs, he/she should get every chance.
In this case I do not "feel" any kind of faul play.
But, bro - we'll see in the future - guess there's never any 100%..
Cheers!
Denner
|
11-14-08 12:20pm
|
Reply
210
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(asmith12's Reply)
Well, bro - you cannot take it from him (the new user, hondaman) that he THINKS it's "the best erotic art site on the net" - just because hondaman is new HERE - he - like so many others - could have been browsing for years - and then just joined PU.
And this user once also rated Met Art to 96 - because of the great models/quality in photosets - that I've since downgraded it had to do with the less exiting videos.
Anyway, I still think our new fellow PU has done a pretty good review here....
|
11-14-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
211
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from hondaman:
What do you mean lack of search? Did you not see the search bar at the top right on the site? If you click it you have:
advanced search the options cover
shaved(pubic hair)shaved,trimmed,not trimmed
location: inside,outside
hair color:black,blonde,brown,red
eye color:black,blue,brown,green
weight: in Kgs
height: in cm
Photographer: all Photographer names
model: all model names
breast size:small,medium,large
country:all 180 of them(will show all models from that country)
ethnicity:variuos races
Are you sure that you where ever a member of this site? As I dont see how you can say that there is no search when there most certinaly is one on the site.
|
11-13-08 08:41pm
|
Reply
212
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from hondaman:
Not sure what you mean by "lack of fire". That seems to me to be what MET-Art models show that other errotic sites dont but everyone has their own opnion.
|
11-13-08 07:26pm
|
Reply
213
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from exotics4me:
Hey asmith12,
I also had a problem with the "moods" of the models on Met Art, I think I referred to as, "What is that on that far away mountain away from the cameraman?" They look like they are trying to pose naturally, like they are distant and caught in a moment of thought. My attempt to show that the pictures are too dramatic for their own good isn't working ha ha.
I do like the models, but one thing that really hurts is that a lot of the models have been seen on other sites, in much more playful, fun sets where they give off a whole other vibe. That's it! The models look too serious on Met-Art. On the basis of the site's quality though, there is very little, if anything to ever complain about as you pointed out. It just feels like the personality from the models is lacking. Great review.
|
09-29-08 11:39am
|
Reply
214
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Monahan:
Great review, asmith12. I couldn't nail my problem with Met Art until I read your comments. Then it hit me. There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics. Gorgeous babes shot beautifully, but something is missing.
And that explains why I found the videos to be unsatisfying; most of them are simply someone videotaping a photo shoot with all the emotion of an ice cube melting.
Private once had a series of videos of their hardcore shoots and it bombed out. Who wants to see a guy about to get a BJ being told to move over a little bit for a better angle, or a full vaginal insertion being delayed as the lighting is reset?
Porn is about fantasy and emotion. Met Art misses that element, IMO.
|
09-29-08 08:37am
|
Reply
215
|
Murder Lily
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from monica:
(asmith12's Reply)
I understand why you feel suspicious. aamurphy has been a member of the site for quite awhile now, and really enjoys it. I put up a link inside my members area asking members to help promote Murder Lily by coming here and adding their reviews, and he took the opportunity. He told me what he had done, so I came here to reply.
I'm afraid I'm not sure how I can prove to you that he is indeed one of my members. However, I feel confident saying let's just give it time, and hopefully some more members will reply and you will see what they think.
While aamurphy feels extremely positive about the site, perhaps you will see more balanced replies in time and an overall view of my site will emerge.
|
10-23-08 12:53pm
|
Reply
216
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from mbaya:
How much of an archive do you have access to? I was a member several years ago and I believe it was only about a month's worth.
|
02-14-10 11:11am
|
Reply
217
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Capn:
I wholeheartedly agree with you.
The first time an anchor appears in the episode, she should strip from fully clothed. I can live with nude from the start on a second appearance.
Are they still showing guest anchor segments fully nude then an interview with them fully clothed?
I do wish they would show the clothed interview first!
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-13-10 05:32am
|
Reply
218
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from kkman112:
Do you think you could elaborate on video quality? "very good" and "even better" are not valid units of measurement. :)
|
02-13-10 03:18am
|
Reply
219
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Lionheart:
Good review I was kinda wondering about this site, I wishing is was more like this japanese movie I saw where the girl was a news anchor, reading the news then guys would come in and have sex with her while she is trying to read the news. Still I might check this site out, great review thanks!
|
10-06-08 10:57am
|
Reply
220
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from messmer:
A very good and very accurate review! I had taken out a long term subscription because the price was right and regretted it almost from the start. They did well in the beginning because there was much more stripping while they read the news and I was highly displeased to discover (and told them so) that they started off nude or wore a suit jacket that could be shed in five seconds way too often. I don't think I watched their show more than two times a week during the last two months of my subscription. And if Victoria Sinclair, the main anchor, started off nude, the show wouldn't last any longer than that. Instant switch to something else.
|
10-06-08 08:52am
|
Reply
221
|
Nakedby
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(asmith12's Reply)
as i know it`s kbyte. my window shows KB/s..in my speedmanager i have a stream with 12.000 kbit/s, so it`s fast :)..anyway the videos aren`t my type of taste....
|
10-22-07 04:12am
|
Reply
222
|
Naughty Athletics
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
from elonlybuster:
There are a few sites that say something similar and thing that gets quite a few people is that they have a certain amount of downloads, and once you past that point (regardless of the time it takes you to do so) you've basically forfeited the right for refund. They don't say it, but I'm pretty sure it's there.
|
10-30-08 09:16am
|
Reply
223
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Apple:
this is a totally reasonable review. the best best best pictures tend to hover in the high 8 ratings, because there are evidently people who fly through voting down pictures as they get to the top. also scenarios are more common if you look at individual galleries. i think maybe it doesn't make a ton of sense to have a profile here, because NN isn't *exactly* porn. like you said, asmith... it's more of a community. and, in fact, the home page calls it "amateur nude community."
thanks for giving it a shot, though! :)
|
11-25-07 09:23am
|
Reply
224
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Distant Lover:
(asmith12's Reply)
I would like to point out that while I love NewbieNudes I am not a member of the NN staff. I receive no money or benefits for what I post here or elsewhere about NN.
|
11-24-07 08:59am
|
Reply
225
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
from Distant Lover:
I simply disagree with you about the quality of the photographs. Sure, a lot of them are unappealing, but some are of breath taking loveliness. I dislike anything that is hard core. Other people, obviously, are attracted to that. One of the many things I love about NewbieNudes is that there is plenty there for everyone and every taste.
The fact that the frequently beautiful women who do submit photographs do so because they enjoy sharing their loveliness and not because they are paid to is an additional source of erotic appeal for me. When the beautiful women in the photographs submit comments and thread on the Forum I am able to appreciate their beautiful minds.
|
11-24-07 08:46am
|
