| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Good and entertaining review - looks like some interesting and strange sites bunched together. Fat and old though has never been my preference. I know some will complain that "Ass Smoothie" is too much of the same thing with very little variety. But at least you gotta say a site which features girls drinking milk shakes from their own, or others' asses, is a bit different.
Don't know if you've seen the one featuring the chocolate milk shake. That's definitely one I would NOT take a chance on. But to the girls' credit they did both drink it.
|
11-07-08 03:39pm
|
Reply
327
|
Playboy's CyberClub
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jeffrey99:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
It really depends. Cyber Girl of the Week pictorials are normally 10-12 images and 1 pictorial. Cyber Girl of the Month are normally 3-4 pictorials with 20-25 images per set. Very seldom your get a set that has 30+ images in it.
I'd say on average most sets have right around 20 images.
|
11-06-08 01:27pm
|
Reply
328
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Drooler:
Great review -- very informative and concise. Had a few laughs, too.
What's next in the network? OrangeJuliusMyAss? BigCrackBigSlurpie?
|
11-06-08 04:19am
|
Reply
329
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from obsessedoverit:
Thanks for a great review. I had a lot of questions about this network and you answered everyone of them. Doesn't sound like it's even worth the trial.
|
11-05-08 10:42pm
|
Reply
330
|
Yummy Mama
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Toadsith:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
lol - yeah, I don't sleep at the same time as normal people - always been a night person at heart. To compound that I work for a computer accessories company, so despite our unfortunate East Coast location (leaving us several thousand miles from most of our suppliers), we still have to keep West Coast hours so we can actually do business with the West Coast on a daily basis. Our normal business hours are 10am-6pm EST, I adjust my hours all over the place, but these days I've been working 12-8pm, so I frequently go to bed at about 3-4am.
|
11-05-08 09:50pm
|
Reply
331
|
Yummy Mama
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Toadsith:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks :-) Yeah, much of my Porn Users time has been dedicated to the Forums rather than reviews, I just find I'm more inclined to write little bits here and there on the forums rather than sit down and do the work required for a proper review - lazy at heart :-P I have 5 possible sites I could review right now, (not counting ol' Videobox which I won't review as I think that is rather thoroughly covered at this point) so perhaps I'll get off my haunches and do those...
|
11-05-08 09:30pm
|
Reply
332
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Your're absolutely right - once a site that seems somewhat promissing - now more likely "dead" - and also many of the softcore stuff, especially videos are none exclusive. I'd say even the $ 9.95 is a waste of money...
|
11-05-08 08:10am
|
Reply
333
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from atrapat:
Let me friendly disagree on most of the content being years or decades old. There is a fair amount of 90s porn and you aren't getting the scenes the day after the studio releases the original DVD. But, looking at this last week updates alone, I saw more than a handful of DVDs released in 2007-2008 and just a couple of 90s porn. And I wouldn't mind if they had more than the current 15 Jeanna Fine scenes (she's listed in 400+ titles at iafd).
As further proof, if you look at the stars with the most scenes you find mainly still active performers (Trina Micahels, Jenna Haze, Tory Lane, etc). If you go to the bottom of the list, you will find models who started last year with some movies (Missy Stone and Stephanie Cane already have at least 4 each one and they currently have only 20-30 movies at iafd).
The site has flaws (for instance, adding the DVD production date and the name of the male performers to the movies would be a nice touch) and it certainly would be nice if they could add the promo stills companies usually shoot for their movies (Wicked Pictures and Vivid are a couple of examples of companies which I believe that offer a good amount of picture content). But, as it currently is, I believe I'm not the only one who feels it's a dream come true.
|
11-04-08 12:02pm
|
Reply
334
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Drooler:
I'm also a pics guy. Fortunately for those of us who are, some good things have come through of even older (but still great) material. DDF and ALS Scan have been reissuing older sets in larger sizes and better quality. (Do wish they'd do that with ALS Angels, too, and I asked about it but didn't get an answer.) And TeenDreams has been releasing what has to be some earlier material of Mia Stone in over 2100 pixels, and it looks pretty good.
I really appreciate this from those sites.
|
11-04-08 01:26am
|
Reply
335
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from xbigvmanx:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
All right. I'll re-edit my reviews sometime soon to add more content. I wanted to be brief about it because of time and if people read my review they are not going to be bored going thru.
|
10-30-08 08:39pm
|
Reply
336
|
Thai Chix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Some I checked are in the range of 1500x1000. Nice quality, very sharp.
|
10-30-08 02:30pm
|
Reply
337
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Guess I didn't focus on the word, "full access trial" and was just pointing out there is a trial still offered. And yes, we (currently) show it as a limited trial. But I note you've edited the remark since my reply.
Sorry if I misunderstood you.
|
10-28-08 04:58am
|
Reply
338
|
Phil Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
You asked: "Just curious, what size do the photos come in?"
If memory serves, they're 1200 x 800 and usually very sharp.
|
10-28-08 04:47am
|
Reply
339
|
Phil Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
A couple ya.
Just started doing it
|
10-27-08 07:58pm
|
Reply
340
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Khan:
I just did a spot check and see the trial still being offered. May want to clear your Temp files and/or cookies and try again.
|
10-27-08 06:01pm
|
Reply
341
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from The Clyde:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
The photos are decent, but not the size or resolution of many of the sites such as InTheCrack, Twistys or even FTVGirls. I do like the photos, as the girls are very cute and most times the first time Hardcore scenes.
I would not choose this site if I were only interested in photos. The vids make the site. Thomas, the main man of the site, really gets the girls to show their personality.
|
10-25-08 08:20am
|
Reply
342
|
Lifetime Anal Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from apoctom:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I basically came to the same conclusion. I'm sticking with more reputable companies, too.
|
10-17-08 07:43am
|
Reply
343
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Duante Amorculo:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
very true
|
10-02-08 10:06pm
|
Reply
344
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Denner:
Good review, Wittyguy...
Well, got somewhat of the same question as exotics4me: It'd be nice - for a change - to sign up on the cheap trial - just could not find it...
|
09-20-08 08:01am
|
Reply
345
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from exotics4me:
Which site did you join through? I have been a member two times, joining through tasty pass, not any of the individual sites, and I have larger resolution videos. The tasty pass sign up page doesn't even give a trial option. I'm wondering if they are using lower quality videos for the trial? I have around 42 videos from the Tasty Tara site and all are at least 740 high end, some are even approaching 900 high end. The videos I have from Tasty Julie are a minimum 640 high end. I'm mainly asking if it is possible that they aren't letting trial members have the full size videos. My main interest in the site is Tasty Tara, and I found the quality of content on her site to be well above average.
|
09-19-08 11:00pm
|
Reply
346
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from wiild1:
I just re-joined and can cofirm the pictures are still the same 800x600 resolution.
I don't mind though, I actually prefer this lower format as I view my porn mostly through a 12inch laptop screen: bigger pictures just get slow to manage. The zip files are huge in quantity; even though every photo is 100-200kb/each, the total zip file size is 75-125 meg as there are so many pictures.
|
08-31-08 04:07am
|
Reply
347
|
French-e-Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MargulisAZ:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yeah, I think I'll take a pass on this one. Thanks.
|
08-19-08 07:11pm
|
Reply
348
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from roseman:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
lol, np dude ;) That's why I posted this poll ... I just wanted to hear people opinions.
|
08-19-08 06:05pm
|
Reply
349
|
New World Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I see your point. Hopefully people will read the replies here and take note. On those positive reviews, I'll just say that most of the review sites I've seen (and I've got quite a few bookmarked) I don't really trust. Too many of them take the tone of promotions and not reviews. I just use them to get info and maybe find new sites, but PU is about the only place I know of where the reviews are mostly on the level.
It would be hard for me to do any kind of decent review now anyway. I didn't take notes on the site during the subscription and I don't recall much at all in the way of detail. Reply #5 here is pretty much what it would be.
I'd rather just forget that it exists.
|
08-14-08 11:32pm
|
Reply
350
|
New World Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Well, we can both spend our time on things more worthwhile. The site's a piece of shit, and the positive reviews of it are, too. It really, really sucked. Glad I only wasted $10 on it.
|
08-14-08 01:18pm
|
