| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
301
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
About the exclusive content business, right! Now I actually haven't had that much trouble due to TBP, but that's because I don't take their statements all that seriously. I can go to the preview section of a site and tell pretty quickly if it's really exclusive or not -- within the niches that I am familiar with, anyway (softcore photography, especially).
But I'm not so versed in hardcore vids, so when TBP gives a site a 5 or a 4 on being "exclusive," that's when I have to go to PU and see if someone knowledgable in that regard has reviewed the site, and done well at that.
Anyway, you'd think the elite reviewers at TBP would be more knowledgable on the "+/- exclusive" question than any of us proletarian PUer's. But what you get are vague (i.e., worthless) statements like "seems exclusive." I think, "Gee, thanks. 'Seems exclusive.' That was a BIG help. And thanks for being that lazy."
|
12-12-08 02:16am
|
Reply
302
|
Peter Janhans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hey, thanks! It looks like the real McCoy, don't it? (Probably helped that the image got so degraded as I tried to get it down to 15K.)
|
12-11-08 01:11pm
|
Reply
303
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from apoctom:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
That's what I was hoping to hear. Thanks again.
|
12-11-08 11:56am
|
Reply
304
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from apoctom:
Wittyguy,
Great review. Very detailed and thorough.
I have a question about the site's content. When I visit the preview pages, I see some girls with "[ANAL]" attached to their name. Obviously that means it is an anal scene. My two questions are: are all anal scenes marked this way or do some lack the tag? Also, how many anal scenes are there?
Thanks in advance.
|
12-11-08 07:37am
|
Reply
305
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#64
from Pinche Kankun:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Wittyguy, thanks for this poll man, I truely appreciate it... FUUUUUUCK!!!!
I am damn near in tears about this stupid fucked up shit!!! Wit Man, just please check out this information:
Homemade Uncensored - Subscription ID # 208342701000000889 Signup Date: 12/07/08 CCBILL ICQ MAIL
Little Liana - Subscription ID # 208305501000009792 Signup Date: 10/31/08 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Little Lupe - Subscription ID # 107265601000014297 Signup Date: 09/22/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Raven Riley - Subscription ID # 107241301000002418 Signup Date: 08/29/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Pacino's Adventures - Subscription ID # 108271601000039085 Signup Date: 09/27/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Nubiles - Subscription ID # 108202701000003673 Signup Date: 07/20/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Best Teens.com - Subscription ID # 107147701000005429 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
8th Street Latinas - Subscription ID # 107147701000002410 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Exploited College Girls - Subscription ID # 107131501000001937 Signup Date: 05/11/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Night Invasion - Member ID # 1267666873 Order Date: 11/22/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Manila Amateurs - Member ID # 1270044479 Order Date: 12/05/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Real Ex Girlfriends, Nasty Angels and Karup's Hometown Amateurs might have changed their billing provider, HOWEVER WILL FIND OUT MY INFORMATION AND YOU WILL SEE!!
(KHAN, PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS INFORMATION!! I MUST DO THIS!! THIS IS IMPORTANT!!) >:D
|
12-10-08 12:39pm
|
Reply
306
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
PUCE is a fine acronym indeed. Depending on how you pronounce it, it rhymes with "juice" or ... "juicey."
|
12-08-08 01:41am
|
Reply
307
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I must say I can agree about the raffle. Hell, I haven't won in weeks! But I still put out about the same amount of verbiage.
Seems that trust and integrity continue to be an issue. We do a lot of soul searching here at PU, as if we might have demons, lurking in some dark corner, that might need to be exorcised. It's a bit curious.
|
12-07-08 01:31pm
|
Reply
308
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
They would have to use the same high quality girls for me to join.
|
12-06-08 05:57pm
|
Reply
309
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yeah, if you want product placement for sex toys, you need something like that CSI episode where people put them in the dishwasher.
|
12-05-08 04:25pm
|
Reply
310
|
Amateur Facials UK
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Toadsith:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks :-) I'm guessing that review is more of an ad, but it is always hard to say. I'll probably sign up in the near future due to curiosity.
|
12-04-08 08:17pm
|
Reply
311
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from sitsat:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Heya and thanks :D
Yeah, I've found this site quite useful in the past, particularly because it seems genuinely unbiased, but only recently joined the forums.
I intend to be writing more reviews and joining the discussions on here over the coming months...
|
12-04-08 07:43pm
|
Reply
312
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yeah, they oughta tax porn -- no! I mean, conservative talk radio! Ha-ha! (We'll see if Monahan is reading ;)
|
12-03-08 03:07pm
|
Reply
313
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from uscue:
I just went there...did not find that 7.50 anywhere
|
12-02-08 07:37pm
|
Reply
314
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from pat362:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
+1. I was going to add something to the poll but after this why bother. It would only pale in comparaison.
|
12-01-08 06:35pm
|
Reply
315
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Pinche Kankun:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Dude, man!!! HALEY PAIGE DIED, MAN!! WHAT THE PHUCK!!! >:( :(
FUCKIN' PYSCHOS, MAN!!!
WHAT IS IT WITH PEOPLE?!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:(
|
11-30-08 06:19pm
|
Reply
316
|
Only 3X
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Denner:
Just want to second Droolers: Great review.
Only 3X certainly does some good - man, like those videos of Christina Bella, as an exampel. Generally the site does not du much in the exclusive ways - but still has a heck of a lot of good stuff, both videos and photosets.
The review is also a fine info-update on this site, btw....
|
11-21-08 06:10am
|
Reply
317
|
Only 3X
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Drooler:
Great review. I loved the "family" metaphor in the BL, too. You're not called "wittyguy" for nothing.
|
11-20-08 01:34am
|
Reply
318
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Pinche Kankun:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
More like Charlie Chaplain on 2 sacks over marijuana!! :)
|
11-15-08 06:33pm
|
Reply
319
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Khan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Sorry, would have if you caught me when the question first launched but now that there's been a number of replies to THAT answer, it wouldn't be right to change it to something else, IMO.
|
11-15-08 06:17pm
|
Reply
320
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Pinche Kankun:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! HA HA HA HA :D :D :D :D
I am always making it official that I am a fucking devious pervert!!! :D However, you will not know how often I remove my skin covered urethra from my pants for activities other than plugging pussy and urinating!!! HA HA :D :D :D
|
11-15-08 02:08am
|
Reply
321
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from hondaman:
Good review. I was a member of Hegre-Art about a year ago I belive and though it was good I felt that some of his pics just seemed to lack "fire" compared to MET-ARTs(though many try to say that MET-ARTs models lack "fire")And Peter seems to prefer the very skinny models which is not really my bag. That is why I said at the end of my MET-ART review that is is best to try out several errotic sites to see what one you like best.
|
11-14-08 12:09pm
|
Reply
322
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from hondaman:
Yeah I do agree before they had the bios for the models it really annoyed me. Now that they do I am suprised at how many are from the Ukraine that is funny to me because I used to go on "dates" with some of the Ukrainian girls that worked at my air base in Germany damn good times those where!
|
11-13-08 11:34pm
|
Reply
323
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Toadsith:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Nice - I hadn't seen a John Waters emoticon before, lol
|
11-13-08 05:17pm
|
Reply
324
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from hondaman:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
yeah thanks. I have been a member of MET-ART since Jan. 2007 and always get annoyed when people ding them for stuff that isnt really relavent like the "lack of hardcore" of course MET-ART is not a hardcore site.
|
11-13-08 04:46pm
|
Reply
325
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Toadsith:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Glad you liked the review :-) The commentary goes along way for making this site what it is, just browse through their catalog (since they are also a token site, everything is on display). I was ignoring the commentary at first glance but once you start reading them it really becomes addictive, lol
|
11-11-08 03:59pm
|
