Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Cybertoad:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Wittyguy , keep comingback it works .
|
08-12-08 11:27pm
|
Reply
352
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from badandy400:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Haha. That sounds about right. We all do our best to enable each other. "Blind leading the blind." You know, PU and TBP should organize a little convention for its members. For those of use who spend way too much time on here and would not mind if people were able to put a face with our cleaver little names.
|
08-12-08 05:15pm
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from exotics4me:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I got it posted, if you want to check it out. I'm also a Pac fan.
|
08-11-08 09:23pm
|
Reply
354
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hey Wittyguy, I meant to reply back to this but got seriously caught in work and let a lot of replies pile up.
I didn't think you were picking on my score. I posted that thread mainly because a lot of members don't notice that I rarely rank a site very low unless it is terrible or a gimmick or rip-off.
I like to call my scoring system a curved one. Really bad porn pun there. Since I usually won't review a site that is below a 70, instead posting a comment to warn others, my ratings range between 70-100, so 85 is the middle. I know that Toadsith also talked about this. I had reviewed other things as well like he was talking with netflix. Mine usually pertain to weight lifting equipment, where we gave "dumbbells" as ratings, 1-5. So, the larger scoring scale gives me some problems.
Just wanted to clear that up so you didn't think I took it personally.
|
08-10-08 12:21am
|
Reply
355
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hey, Wittyguy, I just realized something. We don't earn any raffle points for coming up with poll questions! What about that?
|
08-08-08 07:09pm
|
Reply
356
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I was mainly interested in the video content so I didn't download many zipsets but the ones for Deep Throat Love. I recently checked the few I had downloaded and let me stress that not only the pictures are small but they don't have much interest but to evoque particular moments of the video once you've seen it. Maybe also to catch a glimpse at the BTS of the shoot as the models are sometimes caught off guard or being plain goofy.
They are mainly shot during the scene but also many "pretty girl" ones shot before the scene. Weird camera angles (like the camera rotated 45 degrees), overexposed and blurred ones are quite common. There are lots and lots of them, so not much photo editing is taking place.
|
08-05-08 01:43pm
|
Reply
357
|
DP Fanatics
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from apoctom:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I understand how you could view it that way. I also got a comment from Khan (PU Webmaster) to that idea.
I don't believe that I received a free membership, since it is actually part of the network. The web admins simply added this site to my network access earlier than usual.
However, I also understand that it could be viewed as getting a free membership. Therefore, I have not and will not review this site.
At the end of the day, based on my conversations with the admins, I would like to think that they are giving me access in order to satisfy a customer, not to bribe me into a positive review. I feel that way because:
1. I did not change my review or comment of DP Overload, the review which started my conversations with the admins.
2. I cancelled my subscription prior to writing my initial review. I never offered and they never proposed that I re-join their service.
The bottom line is that if a website offers poor customer service, I would make sure that members of PornUsers know about it. Similarly, if a website offers customer service above and beyond, I want everyone to know about that, too.
|
08-05-08 11:14am
|
Reply
358
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I see a post by him so I'm guessing he found the forum ok. Thanks for helping to point him in the right direction though.
|
08-04-08 06:08pm
|
Reply
359
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lurifax:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks Wittyguy.
I do not spend much time in this club and am therefore not well versed in moving around.
Could you let me know how I reach "Sites that Charge More in Eur than US"?
|
08-04-08 02:15pm
|
Reply
360
|
Ero Nata
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Wittyguy, you've got a creative mind. Sounds like the stuff of a Monty Python skit had they been on during the Internet Age. Or perhaps "The Man with the Web Cam in His Nose."
Anyway, I can see a "live cam" setup, and switches between the porn user and what's on the screen. Performance art for some, voyeurism for others, and exhibitionism for said man.
And for that mirrors-facing-mirrors effect, he could join Ero Nata!
|
08-03-08 12:51am
|
Reply
361
|
X Core Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MargulisAZ:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
$40 actually, I'll add that to the review.
|
08-01-08 06:26pm
|
Reply
362
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from MargulisAZ:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I would imagine this is probably the main reason sites are doing this, to save money. It makes you look good that you update so much, even though there really isn't much more new content updated than any other site. I don't like it because I've already seen it all and like new material and new girls, but people new to the site or to online porn probably could care less, and don't even know. So unfortunately, it seems to be happening more and more on different site.
|
07-31-08 01:45pm
|
Reply
363
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
OK, well, I got off my arse and did a little dallying in info land. "Smart Image Dithering" is smoothing rough edges in images, such as a girl's sweet tanned backside with a white background.
I now recall the Days of the Jaggies, back in the Internet Bronze Age, when images would sometimes have these really hideous zig-zaggy lines, especially on curves and diagonals. Uggghh!
Some folks say it's an issue for people who use dial-up. And some folks say that "SID" actually makes images look worse if you're using broadband.
So I (broadband) went over to Suze.net and did a little test, with Nikki Jayne as my willing subject. SID on, and refresh. SID off, and refresh. Did I see any difference? No.
Well, this is hardly the stuff of scientific inquiry, but the data doesn't lie ...
But I've turned off SID just the same, 'cause I want to be sure that I will see images as close to what they will look like in another app once I take them away from IE.
Actually, it's the people who produce the images that should do the proper dithering, not the end user. It's only right.
And as for the "Smart" in "Smart Image Dithering," that just sounds like marketing schtick. They could just call it dithering. The only thing dithered IS image media, after all.
And it's time to do some Smart Software Upgrading and check out the latest version of Firefox, which I have read is really excellent.
|
07-28-08 01:50pm
|
Reply
364
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from badandy400:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I was afraid that was the situation. I never liked that in the bast and it will make it much harder to know what has been downloaded previously and what is new. Oh well. Thank you both for the heads up.
I rename stuff on many sites, but at times it is not needed. Anymore I rename them as they are downloaded while the information is fresh, if I wait i will never remember what I wanted to name it! I have been using "D-System's Keyboard Remapper" for a while now and it greatly helps with this. It saves me a lot of typing, basically by pressing two keys I can copy the model's name and add to or overwrite the file the name of the site and the model name. This is godsend to being a very heavy downloader.I used it on every zip file from Nubiles and and every zip and video from Reality Kings.
|
07-27-08 08:15pm
|
Reply
365
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Monahan:
Twistys has a third bonus site, Anette Dawn.com, which is not a clone.
Blue Fantasies is a very well populated site with tons of good stuff. Naughty Staff is a brand new site with excellent stuff, but not much of it yet.
Thus there are 3 clones and 3 separate content sites in addition to the mother lode called Twistys.
|
07-25-08 07:08pm
|
Reply
366
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from badandy400:
I have been wanting to know if the zip files are still named weird. I was a member there for a long time but ended over a year ago and have been wanting to rejoin. I never liked how stuff was named there because it was hard to tell exactly what it was after downloading.
|
07-25-08 06:05pm
|
Reply
367
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from TheRizzo:
Nice review, but I do think that a lot of the content from the past couple years is mainly exclusive content. I know the first few years of the site was based on licensed stuff though. Though a lot of the same girls are on other sites, I do believe the actual sets for a lot of the girls are exclusive to them.
Nice to know they have bonus sites now too, but that does kinda suck if they are pretty much clones.
|
07-25-08 05:54pm
|
Reply
368
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Cybertoad:
I will need to see some more reviews the sites look good but again usure. May need to visit and do my own review.
Hmmmm tempting to say , but the low res talk bothers me.
|
07-22-08 11:40am
|
Reply
369
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hey Wittyguy,
I've found that the best place to find the full Viv sets are on Teen Dreams. I think I noted that in a reply to Drooler, a set that has Eve Angel and Mona Lisa, on Viv's site it has around 80 pictures in it, on Teen Dreams it has 220 or so. My understanding of that was that Viv considers his sets to have a flow to them. Meaning, you won't see nearly the same exact pose two or three times in the same set.
As for the scoring system. I probably should start a thread in the forum area about that, since we've had a lot of members that question scores. One thing I will note here is always check the reviewers average score. My average site that I've reviewed is 84.7, in comparison yours is 82.1 and Drooler's is 78.3. I generally rate sites higher and will, as I said, start a thread to discuss that since I have several trust ratings that say, "Trusted but his scores are too high". Be sure to check out the thread in the forum, maybe other members could also chime in about it.
|
07-21-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
370
|
Naughty Staff
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Monahan:
There are a few duplications with other network sites that the site says will be corrected. I'm looking forward to the Naughty Staff site growing with more of the super-high quality of material it has already provided.
|
07-19-08 10:21am
|
Reply
371
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from NA Amy:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hey there, Wittyguy ... thanks for the question. They're about the same as before, what you're used to:
Vertical pictures are 800 x 535 and horizontal pics are 500 x 835.
ENJOY!
Naughty America pictures are super HOTTT!!
|
07-18-08 09:12am
|
Reply
372
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from asmith12:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Not only that, but also to make decent 1980x1080, it's necessary to make it at 10+MBit/s, otherwise it's pointless. And those who have 1980x1080 (to say "we have HD") encoded @ 1MBit/s are just playing good old number game implying "the bigger - the better" (like those played with CRT monitor inch sizes or with CPU GHz in the past).
|
07-18-08 06:28am
|
Reply
373
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr3633:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hello Wittyguy,
I honestly pay very little attention to the pictures and focus mostly all on the video quality (regardless of site). With that being said, the picture quality here is "ok", but not HD type quality. The site offers 2 options (a high res. and a low res.). I will investigate a bit and see what I can find out for you. I think you will find other sites with better picture quality.
|
07-17-08 09:47pm
|
Reply
374
|
Euro Foxes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Agreed - and Shap, I certainly wasn't implying any dishonesty on the part of Twisty's - as I said, it's perfectly legitimate for Twisty's to establish niche sites using your existing and new Twisty's content - as someone who values TBP and want them to be as accurate as possible in describing listed sites.
|
07-17-08 07:56pm
|
Reply
375
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from exotics4me:
Hey Wittyguy,
I've talked to several people about Anette, and how I wish she would just, "let go" in her videos more. I've talked with Brad at Xisty, and a few of the photographers. I would bet Shap would agree too if he reads this.
Anette had some kind of accident when she was younger. If you look closely on her stomach, you can see the scars. Looks like she maybe fell into a bush with thorns or even barbed wire.
My understanding is, she "goes hot and cold" sometimes she is really feeling good about her body, other times not, the scars play a big part of that.
And more than anything the consensus seemed to be that she is incredibly sweet in person and funny, speaks decent English and no one can bring themselves to tell this gorgeous woman to let herself go ha ha! If you ever a member on Club Sandy, I think Club Sandy, there is a video of her with Sandy and a bunch of the other Euro stars having dinner.
Sandy is asking their ages. They get to Anette, she says, "I am 26, um, I mean 21" looks at someone beside of her and laughs as she says, "Yes, 19". With that big bubbly smile the whole time.
I do get bored with her content at times too. I would love for her to be as comfortable as say Eve Angel is, in her videos.
|
07-17-08 04:06pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
