| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
MILF Hunter
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
FYI ... a spot check shows the newest pics to be 600x900 and 900x600
|
07-16-08 09:52am
|
Reply
377
|
Busty Ones
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Denner:
Fine comment, Wittyguy
Spread your offers around - and you may get more costumers.
So, yes - mentioning "clone" is quite relevant.
The once pretty good Twistys probably think that establishing a network will do the trick. But the content is almost the same on those different sites...
BTW: agree with the score-indication - after joining several times I probably will go a little lower now...reason: TOO MUCH clone-style!
Still, the 2 days $2.26-offer is some kind of a plus for Twistys network.
|
07-16-08 08:15am
|
Reply
378
|
The Real Me
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I was just there and here's another important bit of info: no new updates since near the end of March this year. Could this be another "flash in pan" web project that just somehow lost impetus?
|
07-01-08 01:44pm
|
Reply
379
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from TheRizzo:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hey Wittyguy. The whole photo set for a particular scene is added all at once, so you don't have to wait for part 2 of the scene etc.
As for the catagories yes they still do the Softcore volume 184 and then coed update 1, 2, 3 etc to get the 16 photo sets for that volume. Though they direct link the newest volumes from the latest updates page which is pretty easy to get around.
The navigation is better than it once was, but still not ideal. But not a dealbreaker thats for sure.
|
06-18-08 01:48pm
|
Reply
380
|
Private.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I remember the magazine some, it wasn't real easy find unless at an adult store, but I do remember having a few. I think there are a lot of people that still prefer having the paper issue that they can roll up in their suitcase without fearing leaving cookies on their computer! I will probably one day give in and join just to see the Eve and Mia videos. Then I will regret it and be mad at myself when I write the review for their site!
|
06-16-08 11:38pm
|
Reply
381
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Toadsith:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Well back when I was younger, even then the model rockets and progressed far from the old light 'n run tactic with the addition of electric starters and a long-ass cord so you could be safe in your bunker... if you had one. Not to say that kept the launch pads from falling over and shooting the rocket at cars, houses and people. Still - as a hobby, there are quite a few die-hards that launch things high enough that they are bound by Federal Law to notify local airports (even if the airports can't tell them not to launch). These days I'm a bit more interested in that type - especially as you can outfit them with video cameras and such.
|
06-15-08 05:43pm
|
Reply
382
|
DL Assistant
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Mr Fountain:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yeah, I'm in to my second week for membership. The quality is still proving to be good; though for 39.95? Though there are many pics I liked. The models are really hot looking performers that do amazing splits. The pics can be enlarged to fit 1280 x 800 without noticeable degradation on the picture. Those the vids have a lot of these performers doing their exercizes; splits in the air; bending over.
If you like watching this type of thing. I would recommend this site.For just one month though..considering the price...
|
06-14-08 05:28pm
|
Reply
383
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from TheRizzo:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Sounds good. I am going to try and do a review of Karups Older Women during golf tomm and then hopefully try and get one done for ATK Galleria on Sunday if I can find the time.
|
06-13-08 11:01pm
|
Reply
384
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from TheRizzo:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
hahaha, yeah how any site has 800X600 photos today is beyond me. I am also going to take a pass upon hearing that info.
|
06-11-08 06:52pm
|
Reply
385
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from badandy400:
From what I can see so far there has been no change in the picture size. Although, they do seem to look pretty clear.
As for the download limits, they are still there. I got 15 movies yesterday before being stopped until today. If you have an average internet connection than the limit should not be huge issue since many of the videos are about 500 MB and some more than 1000 MB. It does take a while to get up to 15 if you are going after newer stuff anyway.
$18 really is not a bad price in the end. Besides, half of the download failure complaints probably came from me anyway! :)
|
06-11-08 03:58pm
|
Reply
386
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from TheRizzo:
Good question, I haven't been in their sites in awhile. Its one of those networks where I buy a membership, get some of the key content I want and then cancel for awhile. I am a sucker for Mike in Brazil though, so I always end up coming back.
I am very interested in the photo size question you mentioned. If they started posting in high resolution, I may have to venture back in for another go round.
|
06-11-08 02:25pm
|
Reply
387
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I'm a member of this site since October 2006 and I never thought about leaving it. The model Wittyguy is refering to is Andie my #1 (mature) model.
@TheRizzo:
If I may suggest one thing then it's to join the forums of AO30 and start to praise the models you like and also leave a comment or even better start a thread about girl/girl shoots. The owners carefully read in the forums and if enough members ask for something special they let the photographers know.
Oh, and b.t.w. some photographers and models also check what the members write there!
|
06-11-08 01:56pm
|
Reply
388
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mr smut:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
It's getting off-topic but today I had to pay $5.71 for one gallon of gasoline. The liter costs about €1.51 or $2,37.
I wonder what reply I get to my message ... I'll keep you informed.
|
06-09-08 12:36pm
|
Reply
389
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ByteMaster:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Ok, thanks for the tip. I've looked at the forum but havnt posted anything yet. I will do soon because I've an interesting project I've been working on that I want to share with PU.
|
06-09-08 12:36pm
|
Reply
390
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ByteMaster:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks Wittyguy, I'm sure its just a mistake. The DDF sites do look very good. I will give it a few days, see what happens. I've sent a message to Bela the webmaster via PU, but got no reply yet!
I don't want to do a charge back cause then other sites may reject my credit card number in the future.
|
06-09-08 12:27pm
|
Reply
391
|
Crystal Klein
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from atrapat:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks for your encouragement. You're right that it's hard to find solo model sites that keep up. IMHO, the "recipe" for a solo model site is quite simple: offer at least one new photoset and one video a week and as much "interaction" with the model as possible (active in the message board, candid pictures, regularly updated diary, 3-4 webcam shows a month, reachable by email, schedule).
I am not saying it's an easy job to do it month after month but, if you offer decent quality content and make it reasonably priced, fans should be coming by the hundreds and let their memberships renew month after month.
It seems that very few well-known models realise the potential of their sites. Most don't even do the content part right and the interaction is just a promise on the website tour. I'm not interested in amateur/unpublished/web-only models but I feel they usually have a better understanding on how things work and their sites probably get a much higher percentage of rebills.
In Crystal Klein's case, it's a pity because, as far as I could see, the site used to be a perfect example on how to things properly for maybe 1-2 years but, for reasons beyond my understanding (the model hasn't retired), has settled down for no interaction and providing fewer and fewer updates every month. I remember reading in the message boards that people who had been there for 1-2 years were leaving because the model no longer was hosting webcam shows or posting in the boards.
|
06-06-08 02:45pm
|
Reply
392
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from exotics4me:
I have been wanting to join this site for two years, but never have because of the DRM. They have several videos of Eve Angel and Mia Stone that I do not have in my collections. Hopefully, one day they will realize all of the business they are losing and remove the DRM.
|
06-06-08 02:04am
|
Reply
393
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Toadsith:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Haha - only if McCain were 3 or 4 thousand years old. Actually, their estimate of the Earth's age (which would also be the Universe's age) might be a bit longer than that - I can't remember.
|
06-05-08 06:51pm
|
Reply
394
|
Anabolic.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ClownPrince:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
This was my 3rd go-around with Anabolic. The first time Anabolic and Diabolic were a package deal. Then there was only some download issues, but it was great. Expensive, but great. The second time I joined Diabolic was gone and it was AnabolicVIP, which had DRM, so that was a waste. You'd figure since this company really jump-started others like, Red Light District and Combat Zone, they'd have some clue how to set-up a site like they do. Especially, since Diabolic's site (their sister site), is set-up really nice. Like I said, irritating.
|
06-03-08 11:30pm
|
Reply
395
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mr smut:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
A good one but I choose "yes" because I think that all humans should be treated equal.
I can understand your point as sometimes I wish that some guys wouldn't go topless. But it gives me the creeps if some stupid asshole tries to enter a church without some kind of shirt at least.
|
06-02-08 01:19pm
|
Reply
396
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Thanks. Interesting site...for sure. And his success at communicating with the webmaster has me thinking about doing a lot more myself.
|
05-30-08 08:36pm
|
Reply
397
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from Denner:
Fine review, there...
Just my problem with this in many ways great site - the vids are far from the quality/erotica-feeling of the photosets.
And as a video-freak, it's too bad - because the photos are no less than GREAT.
BTW: Gave you a new trust....
|
05-30-08 05:27am
|
Reply
398
|
Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Toadsith:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
It is true - it has a relatively high proportion of cons for the score and if it were a solitary site I'd put it in the high 70's. The site is small; there are a few significant adjustments in the way the scenes are directed that I'd like to see and the content could be provided in a higher definition. However, this site is part of a very large, very easy to use, and feature friendly network.
The functionality of the network is really quite top notch and while I think the webmaster(s) can sometimes be a bit slack on their thoroughness of categorizing the content, the web designer(s) have done a helluva job. I think it is silly to ignore that a site is a member of network if it cannot be joined by its lonesome. The Brazzers Network is of quite high quality, has an enormous amount of content (1660 scenes to date) and while it has its faults you will, excluding if you are totally opposed to the porn star look and behavior, generally find plenty of content that you like.
As for Teens Like it Big specifically - I was impressed with most of the models they have hired for the site, with only one or two of them did I avoid downloading their scene. Do they overact? Yes. Is it distracting? Yes. Is that going to stop me from watching and enjoying it? No. I personally have never and nor do I believe I will ever run across a site that is perfect. Being part of an excellent network helps a lot - and it helps lower ranked sites better than higher ranked sites. Right now Teens Like it Big is being supported a bit by the strength of its network (just like Real Wife Stories), but with some tweaking and growth I think it will become one of the foundations of the network.
Speaking of Real Wife Stories, that site has less cons than this one (except being smaller), but I gave this site a slightly higher rating frankly because the models are more attractive in my book. Real Wife Stories sticks with standard silicone injected starlets for the most part while Teens gives you natural with the exception of one girl (so far). That fact alone boosted the score 5 points for me.
Also - you pointed out the youth of the site as a negative. I really think reviews need to have a certain amount of foresight. I try to review the site both as it is and will be - hopefully punishing new sites less. Brazzers obviously knows the issue of starting a new site with little to no content: in the first two days of its life they added 10 scenes. Not a bad start and they have been extremely regular with their updates at once a week or faster. If a site appears to not be updating, they will indeed be punished severely if they are small - but otherwise, I'm more lenient. Anyway - choosing a just numeric score is often the hardest thing for me as it is so debatable. I hope this novelette clarified my thinking to a degree, if not making it totally transparent.
Cheers!
|
05-29-08 05:05pm
|
Reply
399
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mr smut:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Hi there,
it really depends on the site or the owner(s). One good examples is Alex from ALS who really listens to what his members say and he often replied to me when I wrote him. In some cases I received replies from those who work for him and I always had a good feeling about their answers.
Even better was/is the correspondence with the Crazies who run AO30. They also have a forum and Mrs. Crazies always reads there and tries to answer postings at least once per week. I know that they are quite busy but always take care to go in the right (the customer's) direction.
In both cases member's opinions changed a lot throughout time. Other sites where mostly lame when I wrote comments to the owners/staff.
|
05-29-08 12:43pm
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Pinche Kankun:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Okay, that does it!! I am going to explain the reason why I would not quit my jobs for this shit!! >:(
On 03/21/08, I rented:
- Big Butt Smashdown 1 (WCP)
- Real Cookies 6
- Unleashed Nymphos 2
- (2) Deep in Latin Cheeks DVD's
- Street Ranger (BangBros)
- Real Sex Magazine 64
- Babes in Thailand 4
- My College Porno
- Round and Brown 2
- Cotton Panties #3
- Homegrown Video #706
- Miss Cutie Booty
- Milton Twins
- B. Bay 18
- Latina Fever 18
- Shag Van
- ATK Galleria Vol. 2
- Keep It Right There
- Teen Hitchhikers 17
Out of all 20 of these DVD's I reanted, I GOT ONLY 6% BODY CUMSHOTS... THE REST WERE FACIALS OR IT WENT INTO THE MOUTH!! >:( Wittyguy, you are a smart man! Perhaps you can help me understand why does it have to go into the mouth!! >:( For this reason, I would get fired complaining so much because this world is to friggin' biased!!! >:(
|
05-27-08 11:22pm
|
