Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Wittyguy (0)  

Feedback:   All (830)  |   Reviews (58)  |   Comments (90)  |   Replies (682)

Other:   Replies Received (431)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 76-100 of 431 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
76
N/A REPLY TO #14 from Drooler: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Hey, Wittyguy, I just realized something. We don't earn any raffle points for coming up with poll questions! What about that?

08-08-08  07:09pm

Reply
77
N/A REPLY TO #4 from Drooler: (Wittyguy's Reply)

OK, well, I got off my arse and did a little dallying in info land. "Smart Image Dithering" is smoothing rough edges in images, such as a girl's sweet tanned backside with a white background.

I now recall the Days of the Jaggies, back in the Internet Bronze Age, when images would sometimes have these really hideous zig-zaggy lines, especially on curves and diagonals. Uggghh!

Some folks say it's an issue for people who use dial-up. And some folks say that "SID" actually makes images look worse if you're using broadband.

So I (broadband) went over to Suze.net and did a little test, with Nikki Jayne as my willing subject. SID on, and refresh. SID off, and refresh. Did I see any difference? No.

Well, this is hardly the stuff of scientific inquiry, but the data doesn't lie ...

But I've turned off SID just the same, 'cause I want to be sure that I will see images as close to what they will look like in another app once I take them away from IE.

Actually, it's the people who produce the images that should do the proper dithering, not the end user. It's only right.

And as for the "Smart" in "Smart Image Dithering," that just sounds like marketing schtick. They could just call it dithering. The only thing dithered IS image media, after all.

And it's time to do some Smart Software Upgrading and check out the latest version of Firefox, which I have read is really excellent.


07-28-08  01:50pm

Reply
78
N/A REPLY TO #14 from asmith12: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Not only that, but also to make decent 1980x1080, it's necessary to make it at 10+MBit/s, otherwise it's pointless. And those who have 1980x1080 (to say "we have HD") encoded @ 1MBit/s are just playing good old number game implying "the bigger - the better" (like those played with CRT monitor inch sizes or with CPU GHz in the past).

07-18-08  06:28am

Reply
79
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Toadsith: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Well back when I was younger, even then the model rockets and progressed far from the old light 'n run tactic with the addition of electric starters and a long-ass cord so you could be safe in your bunker... if you had one. Not to say that kept the launch pads from falling over and shooting the rocket at cars, houses and people. Still - as a hobby, there are quite a few die-hards that launch things high enough that they are bound by Federal Law to notify local airports (even if the airports can't tell them not to launch). These days I'm a bit more interested in that type - especially as you can outfit them with video cameras and such.

06-15-08  05:43pm

Reply
80
N/A REPLY TO #15 from Toadsith: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Haha - only if McCain were 3 or 4 thousand years old. Actually, their estimate of the Earth's age (which would also be the Universe's age) might be a bit longer than that - I can't remember.

06-05-08  06:51pm

Reply
81
N/A REPLY TO #3 from mr smut: (Wittyguy's Reply)

A good one but I choose "yes" because I think that all humans should be treated equal.

I can understand your point as sometimes I wish that some guys wouldn't go topless. But it gives me the creeps if some stupid asshole tries to enter a church without some kind of shirt at least.


06-02-08  01:19pm

Reply
82
N/A REPLY TO #10 from Monahan: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Thanks. Interesting site...for sure. And his success at communicating with the webmaster has me thinking about doing a lot more myself.

05-30-08  08:36pm

Reply
83
N/A REPLY TO #4 from mr smut: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Hi there,

it really depends on the site or the owner(s). One good examples is Alex from ALS who really listens to what his members say and he often replied to me when I wrote him. In some cases I received replies from those who work for him and I always had a good feeling about their answers.

Even better was/is the correspondence with the Crazies who run AO30. They also have a forum and Mrs. Crazies always reads there and tries to answer postings at least once per week. I know that they are quite busy but always take care to go in the right (the customer's) direction.

In both cases member's opinions changed a lot throughout time. Other sites where mostly lame when I wrote comments to the owners/staff.


05-29-08  12:43pm

Reply
84
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Pinche Kankun: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Okay, that does it!! I am going to explain the reason why I would not quit my jobs for this shit!! >:(

On 03/21/08, I rented:
- Big Butt Smashdown 1 (WCP)
- Real Cookies 6
- Unleashed Nymphos 2
- (2) Deep in Latin Cheeks DVD's
- Street Ranger (BangBros)
- Real Sex Magazine 64
- Babes in Thailand 4
- My College Porno
- Round and Brown 2
- Cotton Panties #3
- Homegrown Video #706
- Miss Cutie Booty
- Milton Twins
- B. Bay 18
- Latina Fever 18
- Shag Van
- ATK Galleria Vol. 2
- Keep It Right There
- Teen Hitchhikers 17

Out of all 20 of these DVD's I reanted, I GOT ONLY 6% BODY CUMSHOTS... THE REST WERE FACIALS OR IT WENT INTO THE MOUTH!! >:( Wittyguy, you are a smart man! Perhaps you can help me understand why does it have to go into the mouth!! >:( For this reason, I would get fired complaining so much because this world is to friggin' biased!!! >:(


05-27-08  11:22pm

Reply
85
N/A REPLY TO #9 from Drooler: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Yes, it would give a new meaning to the "fair weather friend."

To me, the "upside" (a-hem) would include:
-free porn
-meeting pornstars and other folks at conventions

The "downside" (titter) would include:
-porn burnout
-having to watch porn that I don't like
-meeting directors and reps of production companies that I've pissed off with my reviews

However, I could see being a paid part-time or free lance reviewer.


05-19-08  07:19pm

Reply
86
N/A REPLY TO #12 from Jay G: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Now that's a suggestion I like, down to the part each could play! You'd make a great casting director. We need more webmasters with your imagination!

05-09-08  02:34pm

Reply
87
N/A REPLY TO #14 from Toadsith: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Ah the sexbot, how I wait for thee.

05-02-08  09:03am

Reply
88
N/A REPLY TO #30 from Toadsith: (Wittyguy's Reply)

The Gremlin all the way! I've never seen a Camaro shoot an old lady out of a house on her electric stairs chair.

04-28-08  03:05pm

Reply
89
N/A REPLY TO #13 from Pinche Kankun: (Wittyguy's Reply)

My new style at PornUsers now is not to intervene in conversations anymore... but this reply is Serious American Pie material!

The battle of the porn sages goes between Toad Dawg and the Wit man... You two dudes are fuckin' funny! :D


04-26-08  10:56am

Reply
90
N/A REPLY TO #9 from Toadsith: (Wittyguy's Reply)

According to some pop-culture t-shirts and an episode on Brazzers, the term you are looking for is DILF (as in Dad I'd Like to Fuck). I am totally unaware of the status of this term in the gay community though - hopefully someone can chime in on that.

EDIT: LOL, Porn Users answered the question for me. Apparently DILF is a gay porn site, so I guess the term IS alive and well in the gay community!


04-25-08  07:49pm

Reply
91
N/A REPLY TO #21 from Drooler: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Wow, Wittyguy, you're the Man With The Plan! Playin' all three, from strength to strength!

04-22-08  03:18pm

Reply
92
N/A REPLY TO #20 from williamj: (Wittyguy's Reply)

I would bag her gray cunt just to make Mary Ann and Ginger mad as hell.

04-22-08  12:05pm

Reply
93
N/A REPLY TO #4 from Toadsith: (Wittyguy's Reply)

The other category really offers up quite a large number of locations:

*Africa and its many nations
*The Middle East
*Australia and New Zealand
*Antarctica (as you pointed out)
*Central America (if it is still considered a valid subcontinent)
*South America
*Any of the various mid Pacific and Atlantic island nations
*Russia (though some would call it part of Asia or Eastern Europe so maybe not...)
*The North Pole (and its surrounding international waters)
*Greenland
*Iceland (almost qualifies for above island nations category)
*The International Space Station
*The Lost Empire of Atlantis
*and lastly Andorra because I think the country we know as "Andorra" is really just an Embassy for the Andorran people on Earth and one day they will reveal their true nature, clad in silver skin suits and carrying phallic rifles and offer to sponsor us in our bid to join the Empire of Planets.

Oh - and I agree, Antarctic porn is an excellent idea - if researchers really want funding to work down there - they should just install web cams in all of their huts and only send down pretty female research students to have them perform any indoor research in the nude. They could also do Penguin on Penguin porn as well.


04-17-08  02:17pm

Reply
94
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from Balibalo: (Wittyguy's Reply)

I guess 1By-Day is now updated once a day to bankroll the new ddf site EuroTeenErotica.

04-16-09  01:44pm

Reply
95
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from MargulisAZ: (Wittyguy's Reply)

I would imagine this is probably the main reason sites are doing this, to save money. It makes you look good that you update so much, even though there really isn't much more new content updated than any other site. I don't like it because I've already seen it all and like new material and new girls, but people new to the site or to online porn probably could care less, and don't even know. So unfortunately, it seems to be happening more and more on different site.

07-31-08  01:45pm

Reply
96
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from ByteMaster: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Ok, thanks for the tip. I've looked at the forum but havnt posted anything yet. I will do soon because I've an interesting project I've been working on that I want to share with PU.

06-09-08  12:36pm

Reply
97
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from ByteMaster: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Thanks Wittyguy, I'm sure its just a mistake. The DDF sites do look very good. I will give it a few days, see what happens. I've sent a message to Bela the webmaster via PU, but got no reply yet!

I don't want to do a charge back cause then other sites may reject my credit card number in the future.


06-09-08  12:27pm

Reply
98
Visit 18 Eighteen

18 Eighteen
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Khan: (Wittyguy's Reply)

Guess I didn't focus on the word, "full access trial" and was just pointing out there is a trial still offered. And yes, we (currently) show it as a limited trial. But I note you've edited the remark since my reply.

Sorry if I misunderstood you.


10-28-08  04:58am

Reply
99
Visit 18 Eighteen

18 Eighteen
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Comment from Khan:

I just did a spot check and see the trial still being offered. May want to clear your Temp files and/or cookies and try again.

10-27-08  06:01pm

Reply
100
Visit 18X Girls

18X Girls
(0)
Reply of Wittyguy's Review from elephant:

Nice review Wittyguy and fair score.

I've been a recent member of this site, had to say I was left slightly disappointed, not so much with the site cause its not exclusive material and now available on a number of other sites. More with the current day quality of porn from whoever provides the material. I much preferred it a few years ago when the time Benta the girl they use on the thumbnail for the site above was around. Much hotter scenes in my opinion. This new style really doesn't cut it for me, there is the odd nice one cause some of the girls are beautiful still but the sex is too monotonous for my liking and the girls look like they are just going through the motions and not enjoying it.

Still this site still has loads of great old videos which is kind of how I got to compare, going through the old stuff when the site began and thinking most of this stuff is far hotter in my opinion than the new stuff.


01-11-15  02:09am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 76-100 of 431 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 1.32 seconds.