| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
Amber at Home
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ace of aces:
(badandy400's Reply)
hehe..written maybe at the first hour of membership with shivering fingers ^^
that site isn`t my taste. ambers boobs are not that nice as i like them.i prefer the main site of that network :)..but like ever, it`s a question of taste ;)
|
06-11-08 01:13pm
|
Reply
352
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from mr smut:
You have to be one of the greatest fans of this site :-).
Hell, I'll give it a try soon as I need to have some Rubee Tuesday vids in good quality (and there's other stuff that makes me greedy too!) after I updated my PC and the connection to the Internet as well.
Thanks for this comment even though it makes the decision for what porn site I should spend this month's budget much more difficult!
|
06-10-08 08:59am
|
Reply
353
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from wiild1:
(badandy400's Reply)
Totally agree with you guys. I am sure lots of people like this kind of stuff.
I just wish that ALS would be open about what kind of site they run: The preview pages don't give a correct picture about what kind of members conent this site has.
It's a good thing sites like pornusers exist, too bad that I did not read the reviews more carefully! :-)
|
06-09-08 10:16am
|
Reply
354
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from nbaby8:
(badandy400's Reply)
What I mean by "downloads speeds are dependant where you download from" is by country you are downloading from. For example, I subscribed to the site from Canada, which gave me really fast speeds. Then I went on vacation to asia with my notebook and I didnt get the same speeds there when downloading from the same site. Hope this clears things up.
|
06-09-08 07:46am
|
Reply
355
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(badandy400's Reply)
Looks like I got it wrong. Sorry about misleading you too :( I asked ccbill and they said that it's a regular monthly membership which you can cancel at any time; "12 times" only means that you would be rebilled UP TO 12 times so you would have to sign up again after one year. Weird rebilling (why not make it just "recurring"?) but not sleazy.
I've edited my initial comment to include ccbill's reply.
As I said in my initial comment, no complaint about the content. I'll add that it's quite well organized. As the rebilling is not a real issue, I'd still recommend it to anyone interested in Nikki Benz.
|
06-06-08 01:57pm
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Monahan:
(badandy400's Reply)
On that note, I have been told about pretty good sites by people on here rather than reading a review I will have someone actually suggest a site, Aniazi.com for example.
I'll betcha you meant Aziani.com. And that is a good site!
|
06-04-08 05:58pm
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Wittyguy:
(badandy400's Reply)
I'm with Badandy here. If you ever been to a nude beach you know that the "eye candy" is pretty harsh for the most part. Who wants to see 60 year old hippy grandmas flashing their air bags.
|
06-03-08 03:10pm
|
Reply
358
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(badandy400's Reply)
Jep, that's not clear to me either. Thanks in advance for explaining this nbaby8.
B.t.w. is there a standard size for the pictures they offer? Looking at the previews I get different sizes but these are at least 1200px on the long side which is fantastic for a preview but I'd like to know if this is the best quality they offer.
Anyhow thanks for pointing me there as I didn't know the site before.
|
05-26-08 09:36am
|
Reply
359
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(badandy400's Reply)
Thanks for the information but I'm not willing to pay for another download manager because I have one that works well with top sites like ALS Scan, ALS Angels and All Over 30.
You are right saying that we who pay have to have the chance to use such a tool. It's o.k. for me to limit the maximum number of connections per user but that's it. In my future reviews I'll make clear statements telling you if such a tool is working or not and any site blocking DL managers will get a not so good review.
To me it make absolutely no sense to block these tools as:
- paying customers get pissed if they have to start downloads manually or have to re-download stuff because no resume is possible
- other users get less bandwidth because of this
- the owners have to pay for more and unnecessary traffic.
|
05-25-08 10:17am
|
Reply
360
|
BangBus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from careylowell:
(badandy400's Reply)
Excellent points...I tip my hat to badandy400.
I joined due to pervasive platter from someone whom hadn't been wrong before...
Occasional harshness is okay when several other reviews read as if they were written by the site owner's brother. A quick read of my cts regarding other sites will reveal that I'm not a wet blanket day in, day out.
|
05-23-08 06:49pm
|
Reply
361
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from asmith12:
(badandy400's Reply)
> Besides, I am preparing for when the evil people take porn away from
> us, this way I should have enough to last me a very long time! Kinda
> like people stocking up on food and ammo just in case the shit hits the
> fan.
:-) :-).
|
05-21-08 04:13pm
|
Reply
362
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from asmith12:
(badandy400's Reply)
As I've said, they should allow you to download your 105 movies, but I'm just curious - what are you going to do with all that stuff? 105 movies even if they're 20min each is an awful lot of movies which will take 30-something hours to watch :-).
|
05-21-08 04:50am
|
Reply
363
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from asmith12:
> it is not my fault if their servers stop the download at 87%!!!
It could be your fault, or your ISP fault, or their servers, or their ISP, or any ISP in between. IMHO it doesn't matter: as they can't be 100% sure it's not their fault, they should allow to resume stopped download not counting it as "full" download.
|
05-17-08 08:20am
|
Reply
364
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Goldfish:
Teen Pink Videos does the same thing with the pausing or queuing in the download manager.
|
05-16-08 06:10pm
|
Reply
365
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from williamj:
(badandy400's Reply)
Their the poster child.
|
05-16-08 09:05am
|
Reply
366
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
Just curious: do people actually subscribe to sites like that or are their urls sort of passed around by word of mouth by hackers?
|
05-08-08 09:21am
|
Reply
367
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
Call me naive but I didn't realize that websites like that existed. I don't move in those circles. :-) As to your remarks re. the usenet, yes, I can see how that might be hurtful to the web owners but only in cases where people massively flood the material. In my case, and I'm sure in the case of many others, the odd set published on the usenet gave me a better idea on what a site's material was all about than their "tours" and helped me to make up my mind to subscribe ... or not in the case of 40something.
|
05-08-08 07:47am
|
Reply
368
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from JBDICK:
(badandy400's Reply)
Hi badandy400
Good suggestion on the two part piece...
thanks for the support of my view...no mistaking ALS are a Market Leader...
|
05-07-08 04:05pm
|
Reply
369
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(badandy400's Reply)
Agree that those really huge, bug-eye sunglasses are a nuisance. It's not like they're supposed to be competing with Sly Stone.
|
05-07-08 03:13pm
|
Reply
370
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Wittyguy:
(badandy400's Reply)
I think glasses are hot most of the time but I agree that the overuse of those big sunglasses is a bit annoying. Honey, you're a pornstar, not Coco Chanel.
|
05-07-08 11:43am
|
Reply
371
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
I feel naive because I never tied the binaries that are offered on the usenet to cracking passwords. It's so obvious yet I really believed it was subscribers wanting to share their favorite models with others. How dumb can you get!
|
05-06-08 08:22am
|
Reply
372
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from ace of aces:
(badandy400's Reply)
hm...i used the dap download manager and had no problems as i remember. but i can remember that i had to relog after a while ( arround three hours) but defenetly not after every video...i don`t download photos, so for me it wasn`t a problem that there were no zips :)...which browser do you use? maybe it`s also a problem of the browser. i use the inetexplorer.
hope that you enjoy the site anyway.
|
05-06-08 04:13am
|
Reply
373
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
Thanks, you made me feel better about the times I did look at a "friend's" pictures on the usenet. :-) And it is absolutely true that quite frequently the looking leads to a subscription. It has in my case, with three separate pay sites. I saw some sets and thought: I want 'em all! As to asking directions of a store owner who sells maps. That's despicable. The man loses a sale, the company who prints the maps loses. In the future I will never ask for directions again but buy a map instead. :-) It's only fair. But, come to think of it, the whole thing is theoretical: real men don't ask for directions!!!
|
05-05-08 01:09pm
|
Reply
374
|
40 Something Mag
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
I'm forewarned because I've seen whole sets of theirs posted on the Usenet on occasion but no one will ever be able to accuse me of piracy or theft because I wouldn't download their pictures if my life depended on it (small exaggeration). If they are samples seeded by them in order to draw attention to their site they are not going to attract anyone who is a fan of pictures. If they made their markings smaller I would subscribe. The models are fine.
|
05-05-08 09:05am
|
Reply
375
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from ace of aces:
(badandy400's Reply)
let me know if my point of view was or wasn`t to subjective .
|
05-05-08 07:59am
|
