| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Toadsith:
(badandy400's Reply)
Ah, that final sentence is one to live by!
That batch downloading feature is certainly a powerful tool - but it brings up an important question about really any content site: Do you really want it all?
What we really need is an A.I. Porn Butler that you can teach your preferences and then quietly finds only the porn you want and presents it to you after you've settled into the study, wearing your smoking jacket and just finished a cigar.
|
03-18-08 10:37pm
|
Reply
477
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MargulisAZ:
(badandy400's Reply)
Man, there is no way I could download the whole site. Well, maybe I could, but I tend to just pick through things to find what I will like and download from there.
I'm not exactly sure how much content there is compared to how it was whenever you were a member, but I just counted 1248 models. And of course each one usually has multiple pic sets and many with video. Rejoin man, it's worth it IMO.
|
03-18-08 10:11pm
|
Reply
478
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Toadsith:
(badandy400's Reply)
It seems today's progressive porn surfer really does need quite the arsenal of download managers at their finger tips. I must say I'll have to keep IDM in mind for the next time I run into trouble with dTa, which undoubtedly will happen as the internet seems to loathe consistency and complying to standards. I mean Firefox and Internet Explorer can't even agree on how much of CSS 2 they want to support. They even require different commands for some of the same functions - it is bloody ridiculous.
None-the-less, there is a larger field of download managers than ever. So with the wealth of options out there the top tip is to simply keep trying them until you find one that works for whatever problem-child site your trying to wrangle in this week.
|
03-18-08 09:28pm
|
Reply
479
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Toadsith:
(badandy400's Reply)
You are indeed right, I hadn't noticed that - it appears to only provide file name filters. Well that is certainly a bit of an oversight on their part. Perhaps a later version will remedy that.
Well I'm glad at least Sapphic Erotica isn't intentionally blocking download resume - perhaps there is some odd incompatibility with the download manager. That was the original reason I switched over to DownThemAll! I was getting movies from German Goo Girls and they used one of those annoying "type the characters from this picture" security doodads which meant I couldn't simply give the program the username and password. Since DownThemAll! was within the browser it used the same session id and so on, solved the whole problem. On the same note, I've had some mangers bollocks up the resume ability on certain sites while other mangers would work fine on the same site. It seems like a crapshoot sometimes as to which will work.
|
03-18-08 08:05pm
|
Reply
480
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Toadsith:
(badandy400's Reply)
I use the Firefox add-on "DownThemAll!" - it is completely integrated with Firefox, so I've found it to be more reliable at catching downloads than other programs like GetSmart or Download Accelerator. It is fully customizable - you can tell it the number of connections, the number of chunks for acceleration, max speeds, file filters and so on. Plus if you end up in the unfortunate situation of a site with thumbnail galleries but no zip files, you can quickly page through the gallery and have DownThemAll! rip the image URLs automatically and pop them in whatever folder you picked. All-in-all it is the best download manager I've used - it is free (though they accept PayPal donations if you are feeling generous) and it is updated pretty regularly.
|
03-18-08 06:33pm
|
Reply
481
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Toadsith:
(badandy400's Reply)
I usually limit my manager to two simultaneous downloads and only 2 or 3 chunks per download max - some sites can't even manage that... But no resuming, yeesh, that would be rough. Oh well, I hope they get you a useful response.
Cheers.
|
03-18-08 05:24pm
|
Reply
482
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Toadsith:
(badandy400's Reply)
Have you point-blank asked the support people about it? Usually there is some little trick to allow resuming that they'll know - because not being able to resume a download would really suck for those of us that want to be able to pause a download to free up some bandwidth for a while. (Like for online gaming, for instance.)
|
03-18-08 02:13pm
|
Reply
483
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
from Goldfish:
Yeah, I noticed the problems with the download manager on Sapphic Erotica just recently. I did a "Pause all downloads" with about six going and I had to restart them all. Doh!
|
03-18-08 10:47am
|
Reply
484
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#31
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
Glad you feel the same way about the moans! :-) Just checked my speed again between NS Canada and New York City and it came to a
1986.8 KB/sec transfer rate. I would say that's not too shabby! The downloads from VB were about one eighth of the speed I get from other sites I subscribe to which is usually between 450 - 800 KB/sec.
|
03-12-08 07:59pm
|
Reply
485
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#29
from messmer:
(badandy400's Reply)
I guess when it comes to speed it sometimes depends on where you live. I am connected to the fastest Internet Service Provider in Canada (according to the speed tests I've done), have blazing speed with some sites and am reduced to a crawl with others. VB is a crawler for me. Took me over two hours last night to download five high quality wmv clips. And I'm certainly not knocking VB in other regards, those folks who gave them 80s and 90s can't all be wrong. :-) I guess I'm a picture guy at heart. Maybe because pictures, despite the fact that they can be quite explicit (hooray) leave something to the imagination and I can't hear the lusty yelps.
|
03-12-08 01:28pm
|
Reply
486
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from messmer:
I have to agree with many of the others that a site that has ANY cons cannot rate 100. Contrary to your remarks, I find the speed terribly slow when compared to other sites especially when downloading various clips at the same time. I do agree with one of your cons that various categories (hairy, lingerie, mature, natural, housewife, girl next door etc.) are under represented. There are thousands of titles but all basically with one plot: get the clothes off as quickly as possible and get on with it! And don't forget to scream "Yess .. yess!" on top of your lungs. I'm going back to pics. :-)
|
03-12-08 11:08am
|
Reply
487
|
Asses In Public
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from roseman:
(badandy400's Reply)
Thanks for your good words.
Surely Brazzers Network collection is huge but I reviewed a specific adult website which belongs to this network and I had to review it by it's currently collection. I reviewed Brazzers Network as well and the score is higher but I think that Asses In Public collection is small at the moment and that if updates could come faster would be better :-)
|
03-11-08 02:33pm
|
Reply
488
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from nygiants03:
(badandy400's Reply)
Thanks for the info. Thats good information you could of used in you review.
|
03-11-08 09:21am
|
Reply
489
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Pinche Kankun:
(badandy400's Reply)
Does it work great when it downloads porn? :D
|
03-10-08 09:35pm
|
Reply
490
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from RagingBuddhist:
(badandy400's Reply)
I'm also a hard drive junkie. Before drives took those wonderful leaps in size and all we had were 120 giggers, I started wondering what I'd do when I got to Z. Everything I've ever read said Z was the limit. So I'm really curious how you can have 27 hard drives on one computer when there are only 26 letters in the alphabet.
|
03-10-08 09:21pm
|
Reply
491
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from williamj:
The lack of video's in a minus for SS...but worth visting once a year for the pics
|
03-10-08 08:04am
|
Reply
492
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from nygiants03:
theres about 17 gb of vide0,ok. How long is the average video and about how many videos would you say there are? Just curious as I am interested in this site.
Thanks
|
03-09-08 10:14pm
|
Reply
493
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
Okay - I'll concede that this site's definition of perfection and mine are different. I'm now on my third tour of Videobox and I'll easily agree with you that they are definitely lacking in certain areas when it comes to content. But, even allowing for a site having little to improve, I couldn't call a lack of niche content something that doesn't detract from it's perfection. So I guess we just see it differently. But now, given your response to Denner, I'm wondering if you're not just sticking to your guns because you like the controversy a 100 score brings to the table.
|
03-05-08 05:49pm
|
Reply
494
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Denner:
(badandy400's Reply)
I get your drift. Was a big fan of the site some time ago - I also agree this is still a very good deal for us users. But I still think a 100 - as a max. is way too much, but....
As JD puts it: your answer is pretty good.
Look forward to your comming reviews with maybe more details.
Best and welcome among us "old timers"
Denner
|
03-04-08 11:09am
|
Reply
495
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#21
from Boobs4ever:
(badandy400's Reply)
LoL yea Im a member atm aswell and yea I have done rewiev of it there is 42 rewievs of VideoBox and mine is probably in the middle when its sorted in by date you reviewed the sites
|
03-03-08 06:35am
|
Reply
496
|
Prime Cups
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Review
from PerfectGonzo:
The connection limit is 10 simultaneous connections at a time. That means you can download 10 files at the same time with 1 connection each or 2 files at the same time with 5 connections each via a download manager. We do this to maintain resources for everyone fairly. There no download limit in terms of movies, GB etc.
|
03-03-08 03:33am
|
Reply
497
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Boobs4ever:
(badandy400's Reply)
your first review looks better now youve added some more information that makes it easier to understand why you rate it good. If you read the review rules it will give you some guideline tips what to write. The more detail information you give the better I think, about like download speed, site-design, Video quality and other stuff ppl may think is important ore is good ore bad on the site you review.
My View of this rating system is that only the absolute perfect is 100 so if you think its absolute perfect personally your doing the right thing rating it 100 if the site still can improve in some point its not 100 from my view of the rating system but im not the judge and Im sorry for calling you un-trust worthy review, your not, I was little to harsh. Sry
|
03-02-08 03:44pm
|
Reply
498
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RagingBuddhist:
(badandy400's Reply)
Any chance you mean variety in the themes?
|
03-02-08 03:43pm
|
Reply
499
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from RagingBuddhist:
(badandy400's Reply)
Valid but ignored. I don't need to read anything but "100" and the couple of cons you listed to know you're missing the point. Perfection (whether for you or anybody else) + defects = something less than perfect. Therefore, a score of 100 is not possible.
|
03-02-08 03:38pm
|
Reply
500
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from RagingBuddhist:
(badandy400's Reply)
It's not about hazing a new guy. It IS about trying to get the "new guys" from coming in and ignoring the fact that perfect scores are ridiculous to begin with. Even more so when the review contains cons.
If you can't see this, your challenge to provide evidence of your being mistaken is a moot point.
|
03-02-08 03:00pm
|
