| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
The same reason why some women get involved in bukkakes or gag on some dude's chishcabbob stick (Sorry, don't know how to spell it! :)), or even worse, suck on a dude's dick after it's been in someone's asshole like it was an automobile's shock absorber!! :)
|
02-05-08 11:26pm
|
Reply
277
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA :D
|
12-27-07 10:53pm
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA... GROCERY LIST RECITAL DURING INTERCOURSE... A MOST PECULIAR WAY OF EXERCISING EROTIC ACTIVITY!! :o :O :O
|
12-26-07 07:10pm
|
Reply
279
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#44
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
> if all porn was condom only, then any teen/young person who saw that
> would probably think that it's a good idea for him to wear a condom or
> her to ask that her partner does as well.
Exactly my point. On the other hand, I'm not that optimistic that it is possible to make ALL porn condom-only, and think that there are much better chances to make SOME porn condom-only, but restrict TEENS exclusively to this SOME condom-only porn (and even if this last restriction will be only 80-90% successful, it would still be a positive thing).
|
12-26-07 05:33am
|
Reply
280
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
PHUCK DAT!!! She ain't gotta talk!!! All she gotta do is moan!!! HA HA HA HA :D!
|
12-25-07 12:15pm
|
Reply
281
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
Here, here. Makes me think of Jassie, or Klaudia (the Hungarian brunette), or a host of other VERY fine women who are perfect just as they are. Even if they can afford a silicon beefup, let's hope they never have one!
|
12-21-07 08:38pm
|
Reply
282
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#40
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
> We know everything at that age, and our parents are the ignorant ones
Right! Exactly my point.
> You and I both know that since the hardcore porn exist most will bypass the mild stuff, and go for the hardcore one.
Sure, but my point is that even hardcore can easily be educational and promote desired behavior, so it is not about it being softcore. My point is that if there will be hardcore but with condoms all the way and with models/actors showing care for each other, it should be enough for a teen to stop looking for something more hard, and on the other hand will get used to the view that a guy ALWAYS puts a condom before starting sex. As I remember myself as a teen, I would definitely NOT try looking for anal or BDSM or anything else if I'd be able to see just simple plain hardcore, with condoms or not; and the younger the teen - the less chances for him to try going further, that's a good thing too. Compare it to what we have now: when teen starts looking for porn (and he starts for sure), most likely he'll find some stuff where women are treated like s**t, and/or all kinds of things which are really harmful at that age, from A2M to WS and beastiality; don't you think that if he would run into hardcore, but condom-only and "caring" porn, it would be much better for him?
|
12-21-07 03:03am
|
Reply
283
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#38
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
First of all, thanks a lot for taking it seriously (which I'm sure it deserves).
> I'm really tired of reading about teenagers having babies and how
> cute it all is.
Cute? Not until parents are making conscious decision to have a child, and I don't see how it can happen until about 20 (on the other hand, I think that waiting until 35 isn't really good either).
In general, I agree with you on most of the points, except one: I'm sure that influence of "educational porn" will be more significant than parent's talk (and in ANY case it will have positive effects in promoting responsible behavior, so it will help rather than hurt). The reasons are two-fold: first, teens in range of 13-17 tend to live in their own world, with one of the main rules "ignore what parents say", so while as a parent I spend significant time in such talks and there is enough trust between me and my children when we're talking to each other, I'm still afraid that when they're with the other teens, they can EASILY forget all our talks (probably they will be sorry later, but it might be too late).
Second, it will hopefully distract kids from extreme porn (which they will watch regardless of controls; keeping dedicated and smart 16-year-old from bypassing all the controls is IMHO hopeless, and to make things worse, the more extreme stuff is, the less companies that run such sites tend to abide by rules like site labeling).
|
12-20-07 03:53am
|
Reply
284
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#36
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
> Children should never watch that stuff.
With most of them are fucking like RABBITS at 17, do you think that ANY porn will really harm them? This is not rhetorical question as it might seem; I can't agree more that there should be a difference depending on type of stuff, and that anywhere extreme or condomless should be avoided, and that currently you won't be able to find anything besides that, but if somebody would produce love/educational stuff with right connotations (love, care about partner, using condoms and so on), don't you think it would be more useful for , say, 17-year "children" to watch it than not watch it?
|
12-19-07 12:03am
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#32
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
I don't think it will happen this way. IMHO it is driven mostly by customer's opinion and models won't be able to change anything :-(. For each one going condom-only there will be ten willing to do condomless.
|
11-30-07 01:44am
|
Reply
286
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#28
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
I'd still say that it is necessary to start doing something. Unfortunately, I have no idea what exactly can be done :-((.
|
11-28-07 01:40am
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
> I guess it starts with you, me and others out there to suggest that porn movies should be all condom.
The problem is to bring this message to the public and producers :-(.
|
11-27-07 02:38am
|
Reply
288
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
Completely agree. Plus condom-only porn would play an important role in educating people (especially young ones) to use condoms in their private lives. The only minor thing left is to make it happen :-(.
|
11-26-07 02:25am
|
Reply
289
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
> I think you'd agree that none of us eat it straight from the source
It's not exactly "straight from the source" either; IMHO, getting it from other guy's poorly washed hands via handshake differs only in quantity, and I have no idea if this difference in quantity makes difference from medical point of view.
> The industry probably doesn't want this kind of information made public.
Come on, this is not the industry where I'd expect conspiracy (they're not tobacco companies after all :-)). More likely doctors just cannot imagine that somebody in sane mind will do it (unlike A2P, which they warn about).
|
11-26-07 02:20am
|
Reply
290
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
And about condoms and STDs - here I agree that it is definitely a risk, but... that's the way people like to see it and until it changes, I don't think industry will go for condomless porn.
|
11-24-07 07:44pm
|
Reply
291
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
> To them I say you eat shit and then tell me you feel OK
Strictly speaking, some very small amounts of shit get into people mouths all the time (it's not sterile world after all), and the only difference between this and eating shit is that of amounts, with A2M somewhere in between (don't forget that models wash themselves very thoroughly before doing it). So without any medical opinion (doctors don't rush to advise on it, unlike A2P) I still have no idea if it's really dangerous.
|
11-24-07 07:17pm
|
Reply
292
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
> he fact is that wearing one would be beneficial to the male performer's health only, since he'd be proctected but the female would still be doing atm.
Most of A2M on the market is "ass to the same girl mouth", so it would indeed help with STDs, and I don't know if A2M itself poses any risk (A2P does, but no idea about A2M).
> Far too many performers catch a variety of STD's
Do you have any statistics on it? I've heard about one quite big case somewhere in US, that's it.
> I'm actually curious to know how many people have a problem between condom and bareback sex. That might be an interesting poll.
There was such a poll back in March; only 25% of people have said "I have no issue with condoms".
|
11-24-07 10:14am
|
Reply
293
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from asmith12:
(pat362's Reply)
> anything that puts a performers life in danger, is simply unaceptable to me.
Hm, I'd say that condomless porn puts performers life in danger more than A2M (not sure about A2P). Not that I'm a big fan of A2M myself, but your argument doesn't look too viable to me.
> What's the next fetish???
I agree that there should be a line drawn somewhere. And about the next fetish: I think that from softer to harder it goes like this:
softcore - oral - vaginal - anal - a2m - 'golden showers' - ...
So I've just submitted another poll asking the same questions about 'golden showers'; if it's accepted, we'll see how many people are into it (I don't think there will be much, but let's see).
|
11-24-07 02:03am
|
Reply
294
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree with you, dawg!!
|
11-07-07 12:08am
|
Reply
295
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
You know what, I think everybody, especially those within pornusers, should all just cause an internet riot over nasty shit like that!! I mean just go to every porn industry on-line that thinks that shit is arousing and tasteful and blow a serious FUCKING GASKET AT THEIRS ASSESS!! You have to be from fuckin' planet Neptune if you think that shit is arousing!!!
I will admit to something... the other week, I went and got me the badest prostitute on the world... SORRY GUYS, I NEEDED IT... and it wasn't even 20 minutes that she made me bust the fattest nut all over ass and her back!!! It got all over, even in her hair!! She laid down flat on her stomach when I was fucking her for those 20 minutes, grabbin' ass and being mesmerized by her wigglin' asscheeks!!! I couldn't help but bust really hard on her and she didn't mind cause I paid her good, too!!! WHAT THE FUCKING ARE THESE INDUSTRIES DOING?!!!
|
10-05-07 08:18am
|
Reply
296
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
Man, are you kidding me?!!! They like to manufacture porn where guys drip drop nut right on a girl's eye or make the girl use cum as mouthwash and gargle!!!!
|
10-03-07 11:13pm
|
Reply
297
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
That's because they have way better nutshots than this crap they are producing in this decade!!
There are people who still find it arousing to watch a man beat the shit out of his beef like he is cocking the shit out of a shotgun!!
Shit, he might as well play Resident Evil 4 and masturbate!!
|
10-02-07 11:14pm
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
Yes, it's nice to have a chance at winning a prize, but it's even better when you've been warned at PU about a site and so there's NO chance you'll get burned by joining it.
|
09-27-07 11:51am
|
Reply
299
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
The idea I had in mind was the same as yours: being able to know what all of the action is going to be. That should be the purpose of the thumbs, though you're right that they don't always show enough of the different kinds of action.
But I know from experience that the verbal descriptions may or may not tell me enough, either: "He takes her from behind in every possible position." No, he doesn't. And whether a combination of the written and pictorial will do things justice sounds good in theory, but there's no guarantee it will work out in practice.
At least you've found in kink.com a site that reads like it plays.
With thumbs of videos, I think an "every nth frame" rule of thumb (no pun intended) would work out best for even coverage. Besides, I wonder how many sites are run by people who don't have a good writer in English.
|
09-27-07 03:10am
|
Reply
300
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for getting back to me. I've been wanting to see what people would say, as I think having thumbs for visitors is great. Euro-Pornstars and TeenDreams do, and even Domai has been doing a version recently.
I guess we'll have to wait and see if more site previews for visitors improve, at least to some extent, for both videos and photos.
|
09-23-07 07:31pm
|
