| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Thanks for your explanation about Canada. I've always thought that Canada had lots of the good things like the USA without so many of the USA's bad stuff. Best wishes!
|
06-01-08 03:51am
|
Reply
252
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
My point really is that Al Gore won more votes among those who voted.
The electoral college system in the USA actually elects the president. It gives electoral votes to each state and actually elects the president (the popular vote by itself doesn't count in the US Constitution).
This means a big win (68%) in one state can be easily offset by a very small 50.00001% win in another state that gets the same or more more electoral votes in the electoral college.
Each state no matter how small also gets at least 2 senators and 2 electoral votes just for being a state. This gives states with smaller populations a bigger say in the vote than their population would give them if the popular vote counted (which it doesn't).
This system allows the majority of people to all vote and still be outvoted by the electoral college. That's how Al Gore won more votes in the popular vote (by the voters), but still lost the presidency.
I feel like a nerd for explaining in such detail. But then, I guess I am a nerd.
|
05-31-08 11:21am
|
Reply
253
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Jay G:
(pat362's Reply)
Those not in the USA forget that our system is not a pure democracy. If the majority really picked the president, President Gore who won the most popular votes would have been president in 2000. The vote only counts if you also make big campaign contributions.
|
05-31-08 07:29am
|
Reply
254
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from mr smut:
(pat362's Reply)
Only certain sections, only pics but no vids or only lowres content. To me it doesn't make sense to support this and therefore I saw no to limited trials.
|
05-21-08 12:05pm
|
Reply
255
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
Hypocritical? Sure, and not surprisingly.
Plausible? I'd say yes. I did a little research on marijuana laws a few years ago, and found out that in several states, there are stamp acts for people convicted of marijuana possession. Depending on the amount they're busted for, they have to buy these state-issued stamps. I'd say that it is a tax.
So those of us asking for recommendations on larger hard drives, beware! ;)
|
04-14-08 03:18am
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
Let's just hope there's never a "Porn Tax." Ohhh, this is a bad month to be thinking about that!
|
04-13-08 11:58am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
Well, then, let's not forget the kinds of braces you can buy at a hardware store, or an auto parts store for that matter. There are myriad possibilities! ;)
|
04-02-08 02:43am
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from mr smut:
(pat362's Reply)
Speaking about models that have been shot by Alex from ALS Scan one shouldn't forget Kat but as with Leah Luv I'd love to see them without braces because IMHO it looks a bit awkward.
|
04-01-08 08:44pm
|
Reply
259
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Monahan:
(pat362's Reply)
That's about how I feel as well. I'm not out to get a Pulitzer Prize, I just want to help other P. U. members get the most for their money, just as I do.
Frankly, this site has saved me a bunch of money and frustration because the reviews, both by TBP staff and P. U. members, really tell the story without any "hype." Better yet, I've found some terrific sites that I would never have found without TBP/PU.
|
03-26-08 06:35pm
|
Reply
260
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#40
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
Annette Haven.. Do she have any butt naked photos on the web?!!!!
LET ME AT 'EM!! LET ME AT 'EM!!!!! :D
|
03-15-08 08:51pm
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#36
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
I agree both on what you said about the mindlessness of porn and about Annette Haven! I think porn should show displays of affection and not be treated as a rough and impersonal indoor sport for sex freaks. Annette was part of the Golden Age, when the attitudes were different and I must say, considerably more sophisticated. The movies could be a bit corny sometimes, but in those days there was an effort to put some style and substance in.
Can you imagine porn these days of the caliber of the "The Autobiography of a Flea?" or even "Centerspread Girls?"
|
03-15-08 08:32am
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#29
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
See?!!!
It's those off the planet people that think that shit it awesome... GO BACK TO YOUR PLANET!! >:(
|
03-13-08 11:35pm
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(pat362's Reply)
What's the difference between like and love?
Spit or swallow.
Seriously, I think facials are just stupid, and I concur with Denner and Toadsith that they are just porno performance gimmicks (if I may paraphrase) that have nothing to do with real life.
The '70's pornstar Annette Haven refused to do facials and got criticized for that, but maybe she just thought they were a dumb idea, too?
They'd at least be more entertaining (though no less dumb) if they weren't always done so predictably! How about synching the splooge moment to a climactic point in a well-known piece of music? There are plenty of public domain classics that won't entail royalty payments.
Or the video images can be rendered into a "cartoon" style (such as seen in some TV commercials) right at the moment the jizz hits the jawline.
Or get the girl to sneeze a big loogie on the guy's cock before he gets a chance to let fly -- a sort of quid pro quo.
Sure, these are stupid ideas and one's kinda gross, but given that facials are here to stay, we need to put our thinking caps on and help the industry take the facial to a new, artistic level!
|
03-12-08 07:36pm
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Davit:
(pat362's Reply)
Disagree, Pat. If the director wants the girl to be nastier, he should call 'cut!' and ask the girl off camera to be nastier, then resume filming - or at least cut his chatter from the soundtrack, IMO.
|
03-04-08 10:27am
|
Reply
265
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#49
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
Oh Jesus!! >:(
Ane people request for this stuff, man!! Why don't they stop?!! >:(
|
02-18-08 11:10pm
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#47
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
SICK, MAN!! >:(
|
02-14-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
267
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#46
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
True that, true that!! Put there are still a handful of porn viewers that still wish for the decent down-to-earth porn... I AM ONE OF THEM. :) Therefore, I continue to fight!!
|
02-14-08 11:03pm
|
Reply
268
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#43
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
By the way, what happened to five star video? I mean what did the videos consist of?
|
02-13-08 10:51pm
|
Reply
269
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#42
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
Don't bash yourself, You never know what you might accomplish, bro!!
|
02-13-08 10:49pm
|
Reply
270
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#40
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
True. But even I don't want to see MYSELF in porn if I am over 40 years old!! But yeah, if you know how to look with your 40, it's all good!!
Now I don't know how how Sara Jay is, but she is quite nice!!
|
02-12-08 11:00pm
|
Reply
271
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Goldfish:
(pat362's Reply)
I respect your opinion pat but I have to disagree with associating legal, legitimate porn with child abuse and rape. That's one of the huge problems with sexual expression in our society today -- people automatically associate it with something bad as you did.
When you talk about your favorite restaurant do you have to throw out a disclaimer that you are not obese or anorexic? Of course not. Plenty of people enjoy erotic media in a healthy way alone or with others.
If society had a healthier view of porn and sexuality in general I bet you would talk about it more openly.
|
02-12-08 02:36pm
|
Reply
272
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#38
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
I don't want to see guys deliver!! I want to see women make guys come early because they got some good shit!!! I want to see them fuck desperate amateur blue ball muthaphuckas that will smother a woman's body with nut!!! I want to know how good the pussy is!!
Women that phuck guys that get pussy every 5 minutes will not allow me to find out how good their pussy is, man!! That's one of the reasons why most cumshot scenes today involve vast quantities of "BEAT THEIR MEAT" concepts!!
AND...
Those "DELIVERY GUYS" you speak of... Are too busy trying to shove their dick down a woman's throat!!!
|
02-11-08 11:11pm
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#37
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
Man, as dumb as this may sound, I wouldn't watch a MAX video if you paid me all the money in the world!!
THAT IS A SICK TWISTED MUTHAPHUCKA!! HE IS GROSS, OLD, AND WAY OUT!!
And to put pretty little teen girls with that man is outrageous!!!! HEEELLL NOOO!!! >:(
|
02-11-08 11:01pm
|
Reply
274
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#34
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
I'm tellin' you, man... It's the dudes that we see AAAALLLLLL THE TIME in porn that are with these girls!! The producers don't understand that it should be "BARELY LEGAL GIRLS" with "BARELY LEGAL GUYS (Sounds gay, doesn't it? :) Don't worry, I have no intention on getting confused!! :D)"
When you see those same old dudes that are always in porn (i.e.: Lee Stone, Marco Banderas, Jack Derrick, Talon) that seem like no kind of pussy can fade them, how do you feel about that?!
Me, I want to throw the remote at the television set!! >:(
I just don't want to see Lee Stone's big musclebound ass fucking some teen chick... It just doesn't look right!! I cannot stand musclebound pornstars cuz most of the time, they are trying to hog the camera or they have a low sperm count from fucking steroids or something!! >:(
As far as the girls, NEW GIRLS OR THE 18/19 YEAR OLD ONES!! In most cases, girls that young look like they just got out of High School!! Girls that young looking... NAKED... IS SERIOUS WHACK OFF MATERIAL, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY STAND UP NAKED FOR THE CAMERA WITH NO SHAME!! When they keep putting someone like Courtney Simpson in Barely Legal, I really know they are full of shit!!! Come on, that woman is not Barely Legal!! :) She's flexible as hell, but not Barely Legal!!
|
02-07-08 11:20pm
|
Reply
275
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from Pinche Kankun:
(pat362's Reply)
MAN, YOU KNOW?!
I'll use Hustler's Barely Legal series as an example of real sexy, I'm talking about maybe the first 30 episodes of that series.
I really like the dim atmosphere, the really young teen girls, the unfamiliar guys (Not the constant appearing pornstars :( ), and the when the girls take showers or pose naked for the camera on their solo parts!! I could be exagerating, but after the 30th episode, that's when they started introducing pornstars that are way over their 20's and trying to say they are "BARELY LEGAL!!" Shit, I thought barely legal was 18!! :-l And I am so sick of seeing Kurt Lockwood, Lee Stone, Marco Banderas, Sascha, Mr. Pete, Mark Ashley, Chris Charming, James Deen... All those dudes that I constantly see in porn!! I want some new guys that really aren't trying to show their face too much on camera, like new unfamiliar young men that aren't in porn like that, like the girl's boyfriend or something!!
|
02-06-08 11:04pm
|
