| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
601
|
Just Teen Site
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from tangub:
I think this site has been in decline for some time. I browsed the tour a few weeks ago when I was browsing my bookmarks for something to join. In the whole of 2012 they only had 30 odd updates which was a far cry from when they were in their prime a few years ago and updating almost daily. Sadly I never got around to joining because with a $35 price tag there was always something else better value to join so it doesn't surprise me if they've gone out of business. Maybe at $20 they might have attracted more members and survived.
Even MPL Studios that I once paid $35 to join seem to have come to the realisation that $20 is a more realistic price to attract members in the current economic climate even more so this side of the pond where porn dollars seem to be getting more expensive week by week with the drop in the exchange rate.
|
03-13-13 04:23am
|
Reply
602
|
Just Teen Site
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from slutty:
Didn't work for me either, nor did their other site.
|
03-12-13 10:44pm
|
Reply
603
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from KET924aab:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the info lk2fireone!
|
03-11-13 12:49pm
|
Reply
604
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Cybertoad:
Kinda depressing actually, great review. But PB will always have a soft heart for since being a young
Kid in the 60's and that was what we saw as the grail of porn.
Just my opinion and maybe it was intentional, but seems the world move right past PlayBoy, and they stayed in the 60's and 70. I remember in the 1980 when playboy hit cable I thought now here we go. But alas they stopped short of being a porn powerhouse. And maybe that is because Heff sees PB as art of the female body or adult material but not porn. And guy growing up like me in the 60-70 ERA will tell you, even seeing the cover would get you wood. So are far as I was concerned that was PORN. I remember being depressed learning about air-brushing and later in todays world photo-shop.
Porn did used to be about slammin and hammering. It used to be about raw sexual energy the Heff once had full control of. I guess I always assumed PB would be the mountain top all other would aspire to accomplish.
|
03-11-13 08:46am
|
Reply
605
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Denner:
Fine, fine review, lk2 - and it's strange that a company this size is not doing any better when it comes to websites.
|
03-11-13 06:29am
|
Reply
606
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from KET924aab:
Great review! I tried a subscription to Playboys website many years ago (back in the late 90s I think). At the time I was a subscriber to the magazine, and probably had ten years worth of back issues in my closet. I remember thinking that if the site was good and the Playmate photo sets were complete, I was going to get rid of all the mags I had. But when I joined, the photos were really crappy, so I kept the mags for a few more years. That was over 10 years ago and it sounds like not much has changed! Amazing that a company known for the quality of its printed magazine has never gotten it right on the internet. But I do have a question: does this site have a complete Playmate archive, and what else in addition to the Playmates does it have? Thanks!
|
03-11-13 05:56am
|
Reply
607
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from slutty:
Good news lk2,
You have the 5 month membership, I assume?
|
03-09-13 11:49am
|
Reply
608
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from dieselman:
Isn't it beautiful? :) I will share all information about new levels once we finish fixing the little bugs. Enjoy it!
|
03-09-13 03:44am
|
Reply
609
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Unless the site goes belly-up in a month or two... But I'm guessing that guys like us would do enough research to minimize that risk.
|
03-07-13 01:22pm
|
Reply
610
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#25
from jberryl69:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Not really - they seldom ask their performers to deep throat.
|
03-06-13 12:51pm
|
Reply
611
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#22
from jberryl69:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Well you were "partially" correct and while forceful cock shoving can be involved, it is not a prerequisite for the completion of the act. But the "all the way down a girl's mouth and throat" is what deep throat is. With the website we are discussing I do understand that it is not gonzo - which is good. I'm trying to expand my acquisition of deep throat of a different type (Carmen Monet in Porn Pros "Deep Throating Queen" as an example using it's softly shot scenes). She does all the heavy lifting.
I could not ascertain from your reply if they do or don't show this -
"If a guy has his dick down a woman's throat, she is a willing participant, and there is very little pain involved.
She is trying to give the guy pleasure, and he is also mainly trying to please her.
So if there is deep throat fucking, it's the soft kind"
I think the word "IF" makes for confusion. Can you rephrase your answer in a more direct way? Thanks.
PS - When I spoke of gonzo, it IS what is mostly out there - not my fault the choices are so limited. I prefer the willing and direct participation of the girl. Gonzo guys face fucking is not erotic. Gonzo can be willing - see just about any Mike Adriano oral and it's the girls working, so gonzo in itself doesn't have to incorporate the forced action.
|
03-06-13 09:47am
|
Reply
612
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from jberryl69:
Just have one question - since you know my niche is deep throat, then you'll understand the question - When they say deep throat in a scene, what is one going to see here?
|
03-06-13 05:33am
|
Reply
613
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
My idea of stag films are low quality mini films with no sound. The precursor to what is now called gonzo porn.
Yeah it would be great if someone had tought to keep copies of those great early porn films. You won't really see many here. The best you will see is one that is an average quality print but that is fine with me.
|
03-05-13 06:31pm
|
Reply
614
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from rearadmiral:
Interesting membership option. I'm not sure I'd consider it given the volatility of the business though. But who knows? If Evil Angel or Kink made such an offer I might take the plunge.
|
03-05-13 02:47pm
|
Reply
615
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from RagingBuddhist:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Just trying to keep it seasonal.
Change? Nope - I'm still a little guy with a bad attitude :) Roughly 3% more cynical and 4.6% more sarcastic now than last year.
|
03-05-13 02:00pm
|
Reply
616
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from RagingBuddhist:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
(going all 90s and singing)
This is how we do it...
Thanks :)
|
03-05-13 11:49am
|
Reply
617
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from SelenaMetArt:
I wanted to first thank you for your comments not only about MetArt, but about other sites within our network. We truly value the feedback of our members. It helps us grow and maintain our standards of excellence in erotic artistry.
You are absolutely correct. The site does not update 6 times a day every day. Typically, you will find the large updates at the beginning of the month, with 4 daily being the standard. I looked, and there were indeed only 3 updates on January 13, 2013. I don't know what caused that. Most likely, a set was accidentally removed.
I do apologize for that, and would be glad to arrange a free 30 day membership to Erotic Beauty for you for, not only the inconvenience, but for your input. Please contact me with your current username, and I'll take care of that. :) selena@metart.com
I also agree with your last point. We do an incredible amount of updates. Between pictures and videos, a rough count shows 132 updates in January 2013 for MetArt members. That's a lot of beauty to enjoy!
Thank you for your continued support of the MetArt Network. :)
|
03-01-13 08:26am
|
Reply
618
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks!
|
02-26-13 03:01pm
|
Reply
619
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Cybertoad:
Very nice reviews, I need to revisit this site.
The quality is amazing in most sets.
|
02-25-13 09:41pm
|
Reply
620
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
On thing is the music at times is like listening to a chalkboard being scratched. not a big fan of poor music.
|
02-25-13 09:34pm
|
Reply
621
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from RLane:
$65 for annual, maybe I'll consider that. Thanks for the information on that.
|
02-23-13 04:46pm
|
Reply
622
|
Nasty Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Wittyguy:
Thanks for the review on this one. Just a general comment in that I looked at the tour page and found stuff that's been on my computer for a long time; stuff from Clubseventeen if that site is still around and a few others. Not sure how much of this new or just recycled old content.
|
02-19-13 12:13pm
|
Reply
623
|
Young Sex Parties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from gaypornolover:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Hey didn't mean to criticise! I don't think you used too many words - all my reviews tend to be long... I think if you're trying to explain in full why a site is a certain way it's best.
I thought it was an excellent review.
|
02-18-13 06:31pm
|
Reply
624
|
Young Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from gaypornolover:
Excellent, thorough review. Never seen someone have no many cons they had to extend into the review before - pity!
|
02-18-13 02:39pm
|
Reply
625
|
Teens Analyzed
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
The content often feels amateurish but the girls are all pros because I recognized almost all of them. of course the names they have here are not the same as they are known under but that is way too common with Eastern European porn sites.
|
02-16-13 06:41pm
|
