| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
626
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
One of my big pet peeves with the network is that they have had a bad habit of adding new sites all the while not updating some of their existing ones and then taking content from one site and transfering it to another of their sites.
I don't think the network is bad but it's no longer the kind of network I care to join because they simply don't have enough of the type of stuff I like. Mind you they aren't alone because I am having a realy really hard time finding any site with content I want.
|
02-16-13 06:39pm
|
Reply
627
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
So I suppose you might lump them both into a description of 'Mutually Enjoyable Hardcore'? Cap'n. :0)
|
02-16-13 04:05pm
|
Reply
628
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from pat362:
I'm still not overly thrilled with their new preview site but at least you do get a lot more now than when it first went online last year. Sadly I still don't think the site is worth joining again because so much of the newer stuff is just not good and I already have all of their past stuff.
I don't know it it really matters whether they claim to have 24 or 33 sites because only about 5 are still active while most of the others have been dead for a few years now.
|
02-16-13 11:25am
|
Reply
629
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Capn:
wtf is glamcore?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-15-13 04:52pm
|
Reply
630
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from KET924aab:
Great review lk2fireone! I really do wish they would completely rethink their approach to the videos. You are correct in saying that its a wasted opportunity. Maybe they could try to fill the slow sexy striptease niche--something that's almost entirely absent out there in porn land. I've been a satisfied $99 a year member for going on 3 years. At 8 bucks and change for a month it almost feels like stealing.
|
02-14-13 02:57pm
|
Reply
631
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from cjd2004:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Do the photos contain any metadata such as EXIF. XMP etc? That would usually have the date in it.
|
02-12-13 12:26am
|
Reply
632
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Thanks for letting us know - he was a talented photographer, for sure, and he was known for trying to discourage soft-core models from getting into the hard-core biz, even if it would make his pics of them more valuable. RIP.
|
02-11-13 07:51pm
|
Reply
633
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from tangub:
Difficult to tell exactly what is going on from the tour but I would take the claims of 2 updates per week with a pinch of salt. I had a membership here just over a year ago and if I remember correctly only saw 1 new update in the entire month.
Looking at their list of latest updates I see about 12 new ones added since I was last there. On the home page they list the latest update for Monday 11th February as "Barbara D - In Black" which I already have in my Glam Deluxe folder so makes me wonder if there is some recycling of the dates going on here which was a trick they got up to on the bonus sites.
The only 2 bonus sites I got that time were Ema's Place and Helen's Planet both of which I reviewed. They have a lot more bonus sites added to the package now so I guess it would be well worth a month's subscription especially if you like the look of some of the models with solo sites. If you like Avril A/Ema her site had over 200 photo sets but it was all very softcore, actually less explicit than her Met Art sets.
|
02-11-13 11:14am
|
Reply
634
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from otoh:
thenude.eu is a great resource for model info, especially when confused by the spurious ages that pretty much every site puts up. A quick search finds a model profile here http://www.thenude.eu/Avril_A_5073.htm - with a few links to her at other sites - she may be back at Erotic Beauty?
|
02-11-13 07:54am
|
Reply
635
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Drooler:
I first joined Digital Desire (the former name of his site) in 2002. It was one of the first sites I found in those days with a really professional approach to nude photography, and a signature style that you could identify just by how the photos were done. You knew it was by Hicks without having to look for his name.
Dying at age 58 is way too early, and it was not expected. I wonder how it happened.
It is certainly a great loss to many.
|
02-10-13 07:55am
|
Reply
636
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from otoh:
Likewise, sad news indeed. While his style is a bit formulaic, it is nonetheless a good formula and very recognisable - I can generally tell straight away when seeing his sets on other sites. It also seems very respectful to the models - quite glam, but in an alluring, natural way - definitely a loss.
|
02-10-13 02:31am
|
Reply
637
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from tangub:
Very sad news indeed, he has always been one of my favourite photographers and had a very unique style. DDGirls (previous name for Digital Desire) was one of the very first sites I joined when I first got online back around 10 years ago and to this day his site remains one of my favourites. Condolences to his family, friends and colleagues at Digital Desire. R.I.P.
|
02-10-13 02:17am
|
Reply
638
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Once again, thanks for the info lk2, it may be that they are being lazy with the preview page on Wow Porn, but as a few examples they have posted (these all had the same setting, model, outfits, and scene name as ones I downloaded last year from Wow Girls):
Anjelica "Save Me"
Momoko "Tight Snatch Hunter"
Angela Pamona "Dream of any straight man"
Bianca "Toys are fun"
Luiza Pamona "lovely threesome"
These are just a few I noticed, perhaps it was just stuff they put in to get the site going or their preview page is wrong, I can't really tell if the newer stuff overlaps (not trying to be combative, was mainly just curious if Wow Porn really added much value).
|
02-09-13 12:12pm
|
Reply
639
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the info,
Odd since several of the preview pictures are of scenes I am almost certain I already have, perhaps it is just edited differently ala DDF or just so happens to be same model/furniture/location.
|
02-08-13 09:58pm
|
Reply
640
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from skippy:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Hi,
I absolutely agree that ccBill is perhaps the best billing system. The problem, though, is that the site determines policy and ccBill abides by it. The random password is the site. Login attempts is the site. the tab issue is probably a comibination of site and ccbill as niether seem aware that it is an issue.
The reason I went to ccBill is because they are the site's wallet. If the issue comes from ccBill to the site, chances that it will be addressed are sometimes better than if it were just a little old user.
And lastly, I've had a few instances lately where login servers have been down and I was unable to get into sites. The login servers belong to ccbill. In those cases, you need to complain to both ccBill and to the paysite. There are usually quality of service clauses in the service level agreement between them and you want both parties to think at least a little bit about whether those clauses have been broken.
|
02-08-13 04:09pm
|
Reply
641
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from otoh:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Many thanks for the reply. There is some OK material in the older stuff - I downloaded a little - and it is likely more erotic than Met Art - but for me that's not hard, I found MA has too much to wade through to get to anything interesting.
What's good here is that as well as being subtle, interesting, different - all of which I would take over graphic explicitness - it is explicit too, a rare combination. And although I am fond of the heartcore sites, they voyeuristic nature of the solo scenes here is somehow more erotic.
And I did indeed join for a year! The price was good; it updates daily and probably more than half of the updates are of interest to me. Sure I could catch up with a monthly join every so often; but it's good to have one annual one which will (hopefully) always have something interesting, regardless of what else I'm doing.
|
02-08-13 06:59am
|
Reply
642
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the info lk2, I just meant from looking at the previews of the site a lot of the content on Wow Porn looked like content that was already on Wow Girls.
|
02-05-13 06:35pm
|
Reply
643
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from KET924aab:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for that excellent break down. I'll probably go with Young Legal Porn--looks like a great site!
|
02-04-13 05:08pm
|
Reply
644
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from slutty:
Great review lk2,
I agree it is a very good site. Any opinions on Wow Porn, seems to mostly just be mostly the b/g type material right from Wow Girls? Perhaps just cause it is a new site...
|
02-04-13 04:14pm
|
Reply
645
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from SelenaMetArt:
I agree with PinkPanther. ~smiles~ Personal preference for style certainly comes into play with MichaelNinn.com, as it does with any other site. The partnership truly is a win/win/win...not only for Ninn and MetArt, but for porn aficionados that love his work, and the lovely ladies that are part of helping create his vision.
|
02-04-13 11:35am
|
Reply
646
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from dieselman:
Dear lk2fireone!
Thank you so much for your excellent review! We are very glad about it!
Thank you for your time to work on this review!
I am also glad you liked that surprise of getting access to WowPorn at no additional costs! All WowGirls members receive it for free from a first day (and vice versa)
|
02-04-13 09:17am
|
Reply
647
|
Wow Orgasms
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Stas RC:
Yes, it`s our newest site!
|
02-04-13 09:07am
|
Reply
648
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
To make things more strange, Wow and Diesel are separate corporate entities too...
I checked my email, but like you I don't have that offer. They must have targeted specific former members.
|
02-03-13 06:45pm
|
Reply
649
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from KET924aab:
Yes, great review lk2fireone. It's hard to figure out which Diesel site to join first. Any advice?
|
02-03-13 11:25am
|
Reply
650
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review! (I'll admit to being a bit biased as I think these Wow sites and the Diesel sites are among the best on the 'net.) These sites seem to do everything right.
|
02-03-13 05:37am
|
