| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
701
|
Rub A Teen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the concern, lk2fireone, but when it comes to petite lasses in massage scenarios I'm like an addict. I hope you're right and the site isn't too bad... But I haven't joined yet...
|
11-17-12 07:38pm
|
Reply
702
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from tangub:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
My initial attempts at trying to cross reference her at some model index sites came up with a blank so I was quite willing to go along with the fantasy that she's a nice wholesome 18 year old Texan girl. Only thing was when going through the photo sets particularly the outdoor settings something was telling me "this is not USA". I just got the feeling that the locations were some of the same ones used by the photographer Leocont at Met-Art so I dug out some of his photo sets just to see and of course one of the sets I opened was Venus A and after seeing those distictive tan lines and the mole on the left tit that's when I made the connection.
Anyway Met give her current age as 25 so I guess that would put her at around 18 when the Debbie Teen content was shot and as the site is not updating she will always be 18 there so I guess some truth in the advertising afterall.
|
11-14-12 01:50am
|
Reply
703
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the info. I wonder why dieselman stopped offering the TBP / PU discount. My guess is that it might have been too much of a good thing considering his sites attract a lot of attention here. While it looks like this might be the first time ever I'll spend $100 on a porn site I may end up doing that. One problem with that is that a lot of the sites don't update.
I wish dieselman would consider a new TBP /PU discount that allowed him to make money and give us some preferential treatment since we're all such big fans. Maybe a $50 monthly fee for full access.
|
11-13-12 04:53pm
|
Reply
704
|
Lay The Kat
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from tangub:
A very thourough review lk2, no stone left unturned as usual.
|
11-13-12 11:21am
|
Reply
705
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from dieselman:
Nothing is more enjoyable than getting ideas from our lovely, smart and loyal members!
We have just upgraded our security system. Starting right now, accross all our sites, you will be asked to fill in a captcha numbers only once. The system will remember your first succesful login and the place you login from and won't bug you with captcha anymore.
You are always welcome to improve us, we will do anything to satisfy your wishes and whims :))
|
11-12-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
706
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Claypaws:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yes, I have even seen some that are caSe sensitiVe and it is almost impossible to guess those right. The very distorted ones are so irritating that I wonder if sites do it to limit the demand on their bandwidth, knowing that many users will give up.
|
11-08-12 04:32pm
|
Reply
707
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Claypaws:
The reason for this is that captchas timeout. Refreshing the captcha resets the clock but there must be a site error in initially presenting a captcha without a clock reset.
I hate captchas too. It is usually impossible to distinguish between letter O and numeric 0 and between numeric 1 and letter l. And they are often completely impossible to read.
|
11-08-12 10:06am
|
Reply
708
|
Ex GF Box
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment from lk2fireone:
Problem cleared up. Did not have to delete history or cookies from browser. Now able to enter member area of site.
|
11-07-12 01:49pm
|
Reply
709
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Claypaws:
I think that sites would put the administrative HQ wherever gives them the best advantages for legal and financial matters. For example, if they put the HQ in Europe, they would be legally obliged to add VAT to the subscriptions of European residents and pay the tax over to the EU. I know this fuels the regional pricing debate but there really is a legal obligation on Euro-based sites to do that. Locating in USA gets around that issue.
Also, being based in the US allows them to keep records in accordance with 2257 regulations. This enables them not only to prove the legal age of the models, which saves them from all sorts of problems worldwide, but also allows them to insist on photographers giving them the proof required by 2257.
Those are the two main reasons I can think of.
I always thought Amsterdam was a strange choice of move for AW but perhaps there are different legal advantages for them there.
BTW, this looks to me more like a forum topic than a comment on MET-ART. It would not surprise me if Khan moves it to the forum :-)
|
11-05-12 02:14pm
|
Reply
710
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from hodayathink:
I doubt there's much of a benefit to being headquartered in Southern California, but when it comes to them as a corporation, I don't really see much of a benefit to them being headquartered in Europe, either. This site seems like the people that run the site from a business perspective are completely removed from the people that run the site from a content perspective, so I don't think having the headquarters closer to where they get their talent from would make any difference.
|
11-05-12 10:14am
|
Reply
711
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from oldfizzywig:
Met-Art is on my list of sites to try someday. I just can't try all sites at one time. So many good sites, so little time to really enjoy.
Anyway, my thoughts go to your suggestions for a photo naming convention. I fully agree that the model's name should be the first part of the photo name! Then some intermediate data, your suggestion of the date is excellent, or possibly a short description of the set, and finally ending with a photo number within the set.
Now if only more sites would use a longer name, or a convention like this, rather than renumbering all photos to 001, 002, 003, etc within each downloaded, system generated zip file.
|
11-04-12 12:11am
|
Reply
712
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yes I think you are right about that, in the early days I seem to remember the main focus of the site was a lot of British amateur models but now they seem to have a lot of Eastern Europeans, I even noticed Young Legal Porn's Beata had a new update when I checked out the site the other day. I would certainly be interested in seeing an up to date user review if your planning on doing one :)
I seem to remember reading one or two comments in the past about other sites where users have complained about getting screwed by Netbilling which makes me kind of nervous about using them. I'm not bothered about the email address because I already have a seperate email that is specifically used for porn. I do have a prepaid credit card I could try using but when I'm sat in front of my computer of an evening I tend to think "do I really want to go out in the cold to the store and load cash on to my card" and the answer is usually "nope...just join something else with a reputable biller"
|
10-28-12 04:44am
|
Reply
713
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Capn:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
It really ought to be the age the model was at the time of the shoot IMO
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-28-12 02:42am
|
Reply
714
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from tangub:
This is one of those sites I have never joined but frequently check out the tour thinking I'd quite like to join but mainly due to the regional pricing have never gone through with it. Last time I checked it out I was seeing £19.90 GBP (around $30 USD) but today I am seeing $19.90 USD the same as you through Netbilling so perhaps they have seen sense and finally dropped the regional pricing through their primary biller. The CCBill option however is a little more expensive this end at £14.90 GBP (around $24 USD). I would quite like to sign up at the $19.90 option but have never used Netbilling before and feel a little apprehensive about using them.
|
10-25-12 05:48am
|
Reply
715
|
Magic Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from blahman2:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the review. Ive been flashbanged with adds from this site too many times by some click-catcher website and I always thought of joining if the photos of the attractive girls were larger in reality!.. turns out they can actually be smaller! lol thanks for saving 20+ bucks for me!
|
10-23-12 06:19pm
|
Reply
716
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
It would be interesting to know, if & how effectively they deal with this.
Cap'n. ;0)
|
10-22-12 11:32pm
|
Reply
717
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Capn:
I think you would be better mentioning that to their Support Dept, TBH
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-22-12 04:58am
|
Reply
718
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Ergo Proxy:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I think it is difficult for them to include such sets because of their massive update schedule. I don't want to beef here. MetArt is still the best site concerning nude photography. Femjoy is also sort of cool. Was a member there for some months. They are rather on the full naked side but I also like to see some lingerie so MetArt is still my favorite.
|
10-19-12 01:35pm
|
Reply
719
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Ergo Proxy:
MetArt is the kind of site you can easily get lost archiving ad infinitum and forget to enjoy the pictures because their content is so huge. Do they make efforts to bring back some more artsy shoots like from Ronin back in the days? I would love to see some more of this kind.
|
10-19-12 09:58am
|
Reply
720
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Drooler:
Here, here. MetArt Rules! And I agree that their paragraph-long file names should have, as the topic, the name of the model, not the site.
|
10-18-12 04:40pm
|
Reply
721
|
Molly's Bedroom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Just ran a fast check on the Lana bonus-site:
Still updating on photosets - and quite a lot in 2012 and earlier - but no vid-update since 2007.
She does not look older at all those new pix-sets, so guess it's like Teendreams (for one) older material, but not earlier released...there are tons of sets with Lana...a little over 120 sets - both hc, solo and a few lez. And it really looks ok in pix style and quality...
|
10-17-12 11:43am
|
Reply
722
|
Sugar Paradise
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Cybertoad:
My firewall blocked this site with
" Warning: Unsafe Website Blocked!
fucking-cash.com "
Anyone know anything about this, my software only blocks a site like this if it is installing a script on my pc which is not good.
Just wondered.
|
10-17-12 09:50am
|
Reply
723
|
Sugar Paradise
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Guess your're right....it was once a place to get some/a few fine exclusive pieces of material ....was wondering a bit about this place, but I'll skip it for now...Thanks!
|
10-17-12 07:21am
|
Reply
724
|
Sugar Paradise
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Denner:
Fine review, lk2. Was a member long time ago at one of the bonus-sites - and then had this, too - of course. Do they still provide the bonus sites, as said at TBP - you made a review for Pearl Teens last month. So I guess that's so - or?
BTW: I think it's very fine, that we make reviews of each - most important sites - from a network...not all have the same taste, thumbs up, lk2.
|
10-17-12 05:51am
|
Reply
725
|
Sugar Paradise
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from graymane:
Add me to captcha haters. There's got to be an easier way. It's tough to think a site that's hankering for more business would subject potentals to this kind of grief. Greed, maybe? Like the cost to explore for something more practical.
Very, very well done review, BTW. Of course that's nothing new, nor would we expect less from the great merits of your handywork.
|
10-16-12 09:31pm
|
