| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
726
|
Sugar Paradise
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from gaypornolover:
Excellent review! I've noticed more sites using Captcha codes - I don't understand why and they really get on my nerves.
If I'm using a genuine username and password I don't see why they need a Captcha too.
I thought Captcha was for forms to prevent multiple entries to competitions etc.
|
10-16-12 05:34am
|
Reply
727
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from dieselman:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I am so happy to hear about that! New stuff we are going to start publishing from the next week, will have your joy with us even more pleasurable!
|
10-16-12 05:15am
|
Reply
728
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from dieselman:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thank you lk2fireone!
Indeed, when you buy a membership of 5 months access, you will get access to all our sites in DieselAccess network. You can also join with TBP montnly discount link and after staying a member with us for two months, you will get access to all our sites at no additional cost.
WowGirls is a separate site but we will release soon a loyalty access for it as well.
Now, get there and enjoy the girls and the content :))
|
10-15-12 09:33am
|
Reply
729
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I guess we can say now, that Diesel Media do not have a network - with access to more/several sites...that you have to pay for each site.
That's been my question/hope earlier, that the guys would create that "network" - a network that gives you access to, yes, again - more than just one site...but: nada.
|
10-15-12 08:23am
|
Reply
730
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Strange....at those two links you get some beta-thing:
http://my.dieselaction.com/login/
...but not any indication of sites.
If you mean just this:
https://www.thebestporn.com/review_company.html?id=1527
There's no network - just those sites they offers - for separate pay of each site......
|
10-14-12 12:42pm
|
Reply
731
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from GordonFreeman86:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks to both for answering.
I just cheked to join wowgirls and it's true, now it doesn't have any option to multisite membership, when i swear it has the option in the 5 months one, yesterday i think it was... Maybe is another site and i'm failing, all that sites are so identical... I remember it said 99$ for 5 months with 45% of discount.
Anyway, i found a post of "Claypaws" where he asks to the support team of wowgirls and says is separated of diesel, and has diferent memberships: https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=73936.
Thanks again.
|
10-14-12 08:34am
|
Reply
732
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
lk2..at TBP there seems to be no Diesel Network.....how did you find that????
|
10-14-12 06:51am
|
Reply
733
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Those are excellent examples of models turned actor but I think that they are more the exception than the rule. It's been a while since I last saw King Kong but unless my memory is faulty then Jessica was rather good. At least as good as any actress could be in such a role. I didn't see too much of Peter Jackson's clusterfuck version of King Kong but Naomi Watts who's a very good actress didn't fair much better than Jessica did. I think Jessica's performance was a mixture of this being her first film, the writting and suggestions from the director in reagrds as to how she should handle the part. I got the distinct impression that he wanted her to be a little on the ditsy side. One thing is certain and that no matter what Jessica's backgroud was prior to doing acting. She certainly became one of the best American Actresses of her time. She is the perfect example
|
10-13-12 10:25pm
|
Reply
734
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Is it possible that the videos Met-Art produces are bad because they consider themselves to be a mostly photo site and videos is just something they added to their library so that they could say they have some?
|
10-13-12 10:06pm
|
Reply
735
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from cjd2004:
I think quite a few of their videos are unscaled - this would explain the visual issues.
|
10-11-12 03:26pm
|
Reply
736
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from pat362:
I'll give you my theory. When you are doing photos then the talent of the photographer is the main reason why the pictures come out as good as they do. He or she may take thousands of pictures but they probably select only the best of the lot so viewers only see those. I don't know what most viewers would think if they were to see them all. Then there is the question of technology to consider because photoshopping can fix and alter many things on photos so that the end product looks very different then the original material.
When you're doing video then you need a great camera operator but you also need the model to have a certain level of talent and that is probably where things start to fall apart. A great photographer may not be a great camera operator so sites that are dedicated to phototgraphy may not hire a video camera operator so the end product will not be as good eventhough there was a talented photographer behind the camera. Then there is the model. The only example I can come up is in regards to models and movies. How many very beautiful and talented models who look simply amazing on photos are simply attrocious once they appear in a movie? A talent for taking a particular pose does not equal a talent for acting and you do need some of that to do video. Then there's also the technology aspect.
Although I am sure that films can be manipulated in the same way that photos can. The time and expenses to do that makes the venture unprofitable for almost anyone except mainstream tv/movie studios
|
10-11-12 07:14am
|
Reply
737
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Gasperdian:
If this is the case, it'd make a world of a difference to subscribers. Perhaps bonus site access is the best way to go as otherwise Wow Girls is upwards of US $35 a month which is delimiting! Unsure how good the multiple access if we're going to see the same scenes & content across sites anyway. Surely they must have some variation or else it'll come across as stereotypical & bland pot pourri
|
10-09-12 07:13am
|
Reply
738
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yes I nearly asked for my money back. It must have merely been a blip, but to have that happen first night, with what appears to be a dying network looked very bad. I am pleased I persevered with it, as there is some worthwhile material.
There are some familiar girls on this network, but as Pat pointed out elsehwere, they have different names than on other sites. I prefer newer faces and bodies though. and there are some girls I haven't seen much before.
I didn't have to search much to find material worth downloading, but for yourself and many PU members you would probably only find this material just okay because of the quality. I am willing to put up with a little less in spec quality of pics and vids for quality of material.
|
10-04-12 07:00am
|
Reply
739
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Claypaws:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
"Now, what am I guilty of?"
Recklessness.
|
10-03-12 12:06pm
|
Reply
740
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
As long as you're seeing trhe price you prefer, that's what matters.
|
10-03-12 10:03am
|
Reply
741
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Khan:
Visiting directly from our link, I'm seeing the $19.99 recurring special price. Perhaps you have an existing cookie that shows you a different price.
|
10-03-12 04:09am
|
Reply
742
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from nygiants03:
Thanks. Special is still in place as of now.
|
10-02-12 08:14am
|
Reply
743
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yes, I have seen Candice Luca. She's incredible. Quickly became a favorite.
|
10-02-12 02:29am
|
Reply
744
|
Czech AV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
thanks lk2, can't believe I have written that many reviews in the past few years...
|
10-01-12 10:11pm
|
Reply
745
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Cybertoad:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I too Lurked the second time around until the forum, and watched it for awhile and finally joined. I actually had joined prior to me now joining I had posted reviews etc, before but lost my user and pass cause my old pc died.
But it was a year roughly I still could never remember what user it was.
And I had done a few reviews. I think Catalina Cruz and some others.
Now that tells you how twisted I am I remember the sites lol, but not my user name back then. Still don't know.
|
09-29-12 01:25pm
|
Reply
746
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Toadsith:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I'll take the position if I at least get authority over the Porn Users Army, Navy & Air Force. I'm not sure what that would mean, but I'm pretty sure it would constitute some sort of invasion force... Excellent...
|
09-27-12 07:11pm
|
Reply
747
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Denner:
Thanks for the tip....pretty good price. BTW: Have not been a member for some time - and now (or maybe earlier): They've changed the preview...now you get much better info about updates...thumbs up.
|
09-26-12 05:42am
|
Reply
748
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#32
from mrwillie:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Got it! Thanks so much. Sorry for being a pain in the ass!
|
09-25-12 06:54pm
|
Reply
749
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#29
from mrwillie:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I did not receive your message with the x-art link because I had not activated my account. Guess I need to read my emails more carefully. I am all set up now would you mind sending it to me again. Thanks much!
|
09-25-12 03:34pm
|
Reply
750
|
Pearl Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
The strange thing is that there are still many sites/netwokrs like this one where the video and pic quality is so bad that you can't understanbd why they are still in business.
I'm glad that you reviewed the site because I won't waste my money on it now but I feel bad that you had to. There are still so many sites that deserve our porn money and wasting it on a turd is never a good thing.
|
09-23-12 01:09pm
|
