| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Andrea:
(GCode's Reply)
Im not quite sure what the poster means by no new videos. Every week we add 9 complete moivies (not clips but complete movies) At least 6 of them will be exclusive to TeenDreams, as we shoot many of the models ourselves (we have our own full time photographer) in addition to the many who work for TeenDreams supplying exclusive content to the site. (3 x Russian, 2 x Hungarian and 1 x American photographers)
The majority of the videos we add now are 2mbps HD movies.
|
06-25-09 12:51am
|
Reply
227
|
Xisty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(GCode's Reply)
See, that is just it. I can not tell you about new stuff yet. I will likely be joining them soon and I will be glad to let you know then.
Or if anyone reading this has been a recent member it would be really easy to figure out. All we need to do is list a few model names, find a few that are the same, and make a quick description of the beginning of a scene. If they match than we know something is not exclusive.
|
06-25-09 12:35am
|
Reply
228
|
Xisty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from badandy400:
(GCode's Reply)
I do want to stress that this is for older content. I am not sure about newer content since I have not had a membership to Xisty in a while. The site still look to be worth joining and the new stuff could very well be exclusive since the site has had time to grow and become strong enough to produce.
|
06-24-09 09:06pm
|
Reply
229
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(GCode's Reply)
Hi GCode, I did read james4096' excellent review of the site, trouble is that what's acceptable quality for one is not quite so acceptable for another. The whole darned quality thing is so subjective.
For example, I'm subscribing to a site at the moment whose videos should theoretically be of outstanding quality, judging by dimensions (pixels), bitrate etc., yet the picture of most (in full screen) is really mediocre. That's why I thought it would be nice to see the real quality of the videos in this site with my own eyes.
|
06-24-09 07:48pm
|
Reply
230
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(GCode's Reply)
Hey GCode,
The content on both ALS sites has a little of everything except boy/girl. There are no boy/girl sets on either site. The majority of the videos are solo masturbation, these can be fingers, dildos, wand vibrators. There is a little girl/girl, ALS Scan has more girl/girl than ALS Angels. Both sites have "photoshoot" videos. These are generally not very popular unless you like watching a video of a model posing. They do label those clearly in case you don't want to waste your time with those. They also have fisting. The fisting can be self-fisting or assisted fisting. I'm not a big fan of fisting, but the assisted ones are very good. They bring in one of their tiny ALS Scan models to fist the model from ALS Angels. There is an Eve Angel being fisted by Nadia Taylor that is one of the most believable and erotic videos I've seen. Eve smiles while being fisted and says, "You are very good". That's a big deal since Eve rarely speaks, and even rarer to hear her talking in English. She has 3 years of daily videos on Eveangel.com and never said a word in any of them.
Comparing them to the super sites like Xisty, Teen Dreams, In Focus, Twistys. I don't think the sites are that similar. Those sites seem to be more polished/planned out. ALS will give you a little more of a natural real feel. The thing that pushes ALS ahead of most sites is that they treat models with a ton of respect and don't badger them with stupid questions. ALS will say things like, "Hi Eve, glad to have you back. You look gorgeous as usual" and it is like magic. The girls start smiling more and act more natural.
One other part on their videos, they do have some speculum/gyno object videos. I don't mind these.
The big complaint I have is that ALS Angels should be merged with ALS Scan. An example, ALS Angels has 6 video updates in June. ALS Scan has 31. ALS Scan also has four 1byday bonus videos. They could realistically squeeze those ALS Angels videos in the place of the 1byday videos. Don't let this complaint push you away though. As a new 1st time member, ALS Angels has nearly 300 videos in their archive so the lack of new updates isn't that big of a deal to a new member.
Some of the models. They have Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, Regina Ice, Sandy Waltrick/Summers, Andie Valentino, just to name a few of my favorites and they have 6-12 sets of each. One other con, many of the older picture sets are separated into parts. This is very "old" style for a website. This means to get say Eve in Blue Bikini, you have to download 4 files, 1st file will be pic #1-#15, second file #16-30 and so on. You just get the feeling they treat Angels like a second rate citizen when compared to ALS Scan. I've tried to convince Alex (the owner/webmaster) to merge but he won't. Last tip, not to cheat on TBP, but you can get a discount for both of their sites at paysitediscountdotcom, $5 off. And they usually will send you emails with discounted rates. Sometimes even $10 off. Hope that helps.
|
06-23-09 11:40pm
|
Reply
231
|
Xisty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(GCode's Reply)
Hey GCode
It's a mix - a little majority, maybe like 60% have toys ind the last part of the videos - but a lot of "fingering only", too..
The fine thing is, that most models (with video) have clips both with and without toys - and quite a lot of finger-use. I'm not sure about the amount now, cancelled a while ago - but of the 30 videos I downloaded it is about 50/50 - finger/toys.
Watermark are not bad in size.
And the 5-days full trial deal is sweet - and worth it..a lot of fine solo videos for ten bucks....
|
06-22-09 05:36am
|
Reply
232
|
Zemani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(GCode's Reply)
Yes. Sealed. Or maybe hanging open a bit in spots. But no pink. No fingers reaching in.
|
06-17-09 05:51pm
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(GCode's Reply)
You're right. First it was no snatch. Then Playboy did its first, furry "full frontal" of Liv Linland, which these days wouldn't look like much at all, but it was kind of a big deal then. Then along came Penthouse and then, Hustler! But shaving wasn't the norm for quite a while. Glad it is now.
|
06-13-09 03:07pm
|
Reply
234
|
TS Kimber James
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from james4096:
(GCode's Reply)
I personally can't stand her new look. She looked so natural before. With just the hair, the lips and the hair she went overboard. You see that a lot with TS's. Somebody once described what they do to themselves as a slow-motion train wreck.
|
06-12-09 03:13pm
|
Reply
235
|
TS Kimber James
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
from atrapat:
I don't know now but Kimber James did look feminine before with the darker hair. I didn't suspect anything when I saw the first photo of Kimber James at Christian's blog about a year ago where he introduced the photo simply as "a girl I worked with" leaving aside the TS factor. I see Christian's done several scenes at this site.
|
06-12-09 10:26am
|
Reply
236
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tehlupy1:
(GCode's Reply)
You are right, I did not comment on the quality, as I should have. The 960x540 videos @ 3.17 Mb/s bitrate is actually good. This is a much higher quality than you find on many sites. Heck, its a higher rate than some sites give to their 1280x720 vids. This makes the videos passable at 200% zoom for those like me on big monitors at hi res (2560x1600), but this still does not make up for being lied to about them being HD given the hefty price tag.
So, video quality is good, miss-advertised resolution is bad.
I should have also provided the following:
Videos from the sites in 960x540@3Mbs range from ~17-31 minutes in length and 400-700MB in size.
Seven of the twelve sites included 960x540 videos. Some many more than others.
I am just into vids, so no comment on pics which are average. 1280x853 / ~250kb
|
06-10-09 04:49pm
|
Reply
237
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Mr Fountain:
(GCode's Reply)
I joined early last year; thought that it would be one and done for the same reason; but now have been a member about 6 times over.
Its worth a one time try if you like softcore; its a hot tease.
though, from what you wrote- its looking like you would like phil- flash- really great softcore site; very provocatively shot- super hot vids though no hi def vids- they got the strip tease feel to it.
|
06-10-09 11:41am
|
Reply
238
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(GCode's Reply)
It's a Brazzers offer - they're the ones that do both Brazzers & Mofos.com - google BrazzersPlus and you can find the same offer that I bit on. It's not an offer from some random 3rd party
|
06-08-09 07:38pm
|
Reply
239
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from Shap:
Hi Gcode. Thanks for the question and the interest in Twistys :)
We definitely have a way to view content that way. It's rarely used and rarely requested (I believe our members prefer to just enjoy all the content). Here is how to do it for any one that is a member.
Login.
Click Photos or Videos
Click Twistys Network Exclusives
Done ;)
Let me know if you have any other questions.
|
06-08-09 07:00pm
|
Reply
240
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Believe it or not, I've renewed my membership to Twisty's when it has expired so many times that I forgot what it was like to look at the site without being a member.
But the answer to your question is definitely "yes". As a member, when you click on any set - photo or vid - directly under the "featuring" info, it will say *This set is a Twistys Network Exclusive* when that is the case. Since people previewing the site cannot click on sets and vids to get to that second screen, they don't see this info.
In terms of rates of exclusive-non-exclusive, Shap has noted here that their rate of exclusivity has been climbing over time and today, for instance, only the Cherry Jul photoset is not exclusive - both other photosets and both vids are exclusive - the Alektra Blue vid was done by Gregory Black - of the Black Bros that did all that stuff for VCA years ago.
Of yesterday's updates, only the Dylan Rider vid was an exclusive - the 3 photosets and other vid were not.
Going back a couple of days, 1 of the 3 photosets and both vids were exclusives
So it varies - but there is a fairly high rate of exclusivity as compared to many other sites that also post non-exclusive material.
|
06-08-09 06:44pm
|
Reply
241
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from james4096:
(GCode's Reply)
I was a member some time ago. I should have written a review but I didn't see it in the PU database. But like I said, your review was good and accurate. I guess I should have emailed PU to let them know about this site. I'm probably lazy.
You're right they did try and sometimes successfully get a few inches in, but having a 13" prosthetic dong that's also as thick as a forearm makes it tough to really fuck each other. My taste would have been for them to wear slightly smaller ones, but I understand unrealistically huge dongs are part of the fantasy of futanari.
|
06-06-09 01:33am
|
Reply
242
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
from james4096:
Nice review.
This is a very different and unique site. IMHO, it's really for the anime futanari fans, not shemale or strap-on fans. I mean, their cocks are too big to even fuck each other with!
Your review is accurate and I agree with what you said. Not a bad site, but not for everybody. When this site first came out I just had to check it out.
|
06-04-09 04:47pm
|
Reply
243
|
Brooke Skye
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
from Rick:
Hey GCode,
Thanks for the report. Sorry our info was inaccurate. Very strange since we recently verified this. I've updated the information in our database so it's now up to date.
Thanks,
Rick
|
06-04-09 04:18pm
|
Reply
244
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
from turboshaft:
Great review.
Very unique looking site that doesn't seem to take itself too seriously, though I guess that's required given the genre. Actually looks quite similar to the little anime I have seen, except for all the western girls.
|
06-04-09 01:58pm
|
Reply
245
|
Total Tranny Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jbgild:
(GCode's Reply)
Total Tranny Pass bills through a company called Purchase-24.com.
I had no problems cancelling my account and even got a discount offer of 9.95 dollars.
The videos on the sites are of a very good quality. But one thing to notice is that they DO have a daily dl limit, although they don't mention it. Can't say for sure what the limit is, but around 8 gb's I guess.
|
06-03-09 06:23am
|
Reply
246
|
Shemale Club
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Review
from jbgild:
Just a comment to your review.
Shemaleclub has a daily DL limit of 3 GB's!
Surprised to see that you don't even mention it in your review. This is surely a con, isn't it?
I for one would NEVER join a site with a daily dl limit like that.
|
06-03-09 06:07am
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#35
from asmith12:
(GCode's Reply)
> However, I think that the demo might have been the wrong choice for which video to promote for their site.
Nice to know, thanks. With this information, maybe I'll eventually try them :-).
> when I compare to the other sites that used 640 X 480 or 720 X 480 in the range of 1,000 to 1,500 kbps which I thought was the debate to begin with.
I won't argue that 4MBit/s is better than 1MBit/s :-). What I'm trying to argue is that even 4MBit/s doesn't guarantee quality in any way (and is still worse than best of DVDs made 10+ years ago), and is often far from being "crystal clear". Also from my perspective things like lighting and cameraguy work are much more important than sheer bitrate (within certain limits of course).
As for comparing HD to blue-ray - you're right about the lack of the bandwidth for downloaded clips compared to blue-ray, but given this lack of bandwidth maybe it's not a good idea for websites to release 1980x1080 video clips, and it's better for them to stay with less ambitious DVD-resolution? What I personally REALLY hate is when somebody makes (and obviously markets) something like "true 1980x1080 HD video" which wass in fact shot with poor lighting on Sony Z1 (or equivalent) camera; then it doesn't matter how much bitrate they will throw into encoding, it will still look HORRIBLE no matter what.
|
06-01-09 11:06pm
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#33
from asmith12:
(GCode's Reply)
> I can account for them being just as good or even better than the hundreds of DVD's I've rented.
Wait, but DVDs have nothing to do with HD :-), to compare apples to apples, you should compare HD to Blue-Ray.
> That's strange that you find the lighting for that site to be bad
I've found it bad for at least one specific point in demo video (around 0:03 in the video I've referred to). Do you agree that specific half-second was far from being "crystal clear"? And them, from the fact that site owners even cannot find enough material to make REALLY good DEMO video, I obviously have doubts about the quality inside (if you would make demo for the home page of your site, you would make it THE BEST POSSIBLE way, wouldn't you?).
> if you found videos better than this, I'd like to know which sites so I can check them out.
Easy. Take a look at almost any Private DVD, and at least some Diabolic DVDs (for example, their Panochitas series). While DVD is 10+-year old technology now, and is below freezing point on "how hot/cool it is" scale, it still beats "great advanced modern stuff" hands down, especially when it is used professionally. And no encoding can possibly fix problems with poor cameras used by almost all of the sites.
|
05-31-09 11:44pm
|
Reply
249
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#31
from asmith12:
(GCode's Reply)
I've took a look at InFocusGirls' "High Definition Free Sample Movie" (from their home page). Well, SOME FRAGMENTS of it are indeed crystal clear, but to tell that ALL OF IT is crystal clear is IMHO an big exaggeration. Take a look at fragment of that sample clip at about 0:03; IMHO it's VERY far from being "crystal clear" (not to mention poor lighting, which BTW is IMHO completely unforgivable for a site like this). And as I expect them to combine "the best of the best" into promo HD video like this, I'm even afraid to think of how most of the clips inside look.
|
05-31-09 01:26am
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#30
from asmith12:
(GCode's Reply)
Hm, maybe I'll need to try one of them some day. But I suspect it will be about the difference in how we define "crystal clear" :-).
|
05-30-09 09:33pm
|
