| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Duante Amorculo:
(uscue's Reply)
ye, love a good tugjob
|
04-11-10 10:25pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from jd1961:
(uscue's Reply)
Is being male "talent" a dream job? Hundreds of hours of video showing them constantly yanking themselves, and that stuff is forever.
|
06-08-09 06:38pm
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from badandy400:
(uscue's Reply)
Check out Femanic. As long as you are into that content style. Their videos are fairly small. They have a divx encoding that puts them at 1500 KBit/s but look great. If I remember correctly they come in 5 minute chucks that are about 50 MB each. So you can get about 20 minutes of video for 200 MB, if my memory serves me correctly.
|
05-28-09 12:51pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from Monahan:
(uscue's Reply)
That would be the opposite of me. I'm just under 83 even though I gave scores of 51 and 50 to some abysmally lousy sites. If I had the energy I would go back and audit the calculation but I'm too busy reading reviews and watching videos that feature copulation (and other associated activities such as fellatio and cunnilingus) between consenting adults.
|
03-16-09 10:57am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from TrashMan:
(uscue's Reply)
I agree. I hate when these BangBros, RealityKings and Brazzers videos are in excess of 400, even 500MB!
|
01-14-09 03:16pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(uscue's Reply)
no there all naked except the one that says dressed lol wish only so much you can type on the question lines sorry!
|
09-04-08 09:34am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Toadsith:
(uscue's Reply)
I gotta give respect for including the Midget category. Because, the truth is, no porn collection is truly complete without some Midget Porn. Gotta remember the little people. And of course Bridgette the Midget is creepily hot - she has such a beautiful face! Actually, this gives me a nice little segue to mention my favorite Porn DVD of all time - Cap'n Mongo's Porno Playhouse. An instant classic.
Cheers.
|
02-07-08 10:22am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Khan:
(uscue's Reply)
It will be good to note that the Trust Ratings have changed since this discussion was active. We've since added the option for leaving a comment. Also, the voter can opt to be anonymous or not.
As far as your recent ratings ...
When you received a rating is more a function of when another user read your review than it is when you wrote it. As I've mentioned before, it seems giving out extremely high (95-100) or extremely low (50-60) will cause some to see your review as biased an thus, not as trustworthy. You should be able to respond to the negative trust rating (though it might not get answered) to ask why the user doesn't have confidence that your reviews/comments will match what they'd see if they visited the site. But that's just an educated guess. I have no crystal ball to show me the reasoning used when a User decides to cast a "No" Trust Rating.
Keep an eye out ... there will be a few more poll questions related to Trust Ratings coming up shortly.
|
06-23-07 07:03am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from SnowDude:
(uscue's Reply)
I think it's fair to ask that people who would judge others by a trust rating be limited to those who have provided some reviews of their own. If nothing else, this demonstrates that it's not easy to write a review and if you limited it to people with a score of 5 they'd be more aware of that fact. I think my original suggestion was a score of 10, but I agree 5 would be more reasonable and at least 1 as uscue suggested. I don't think it's fair for someone to register and then waltz into the site saying they don't trust anybody by voting no.
I really like the anonymous comment section for no votes because "I just didn't like something they wrote" isn't a valid reason for voting no. There are plenty of valid reasons, but I think the member getting voted down deserves to know what it was.
|
04-07-07 01:23pm
|
Reply
10
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from drummstikk:
(uscue's Reply)
All that information can be found by just visiting the site! As a non-member, you have access to several thumbnails from each photoset. It's the same structure and navigation that members see--you essentially have everything but the full-size images and the videos.
|
04-29-09 09:57am
|
Reply
11
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
from ace of aces:
in my opinion this site is only a try worth if you really want to see amateurs who are talking jumping and doing not sexual things. if you like a little "harder" amateurs you have to go to www.karupsha.com
for me it was a waste of money. i have not a single file anymore at my computer!
|
12-12-07 04:16am
|
Reply
12
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
from abbywinters:
hi uscue!
The "regular" membership gets you access to all our solo shoots - around 800 in the back catalogue, and three new ones each week (most shoots have stills and video components). It DOES NOT give you access to the girl-girl or our special intimate masturbation video project, but of "gold" section does.
We do not have paid trial, but if you like the look of our stuff from the tour, you will def like what's inside!
|
12-11-07 08:19pm
|
Reply
13
|
Adult Doorway
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mbaya:
(uscue's Reply)
You guessed correctly. You can only see the site, not do anything else. I don't need a trial for this. However, after I complained I got full access.
|
02-19-09 02:45pm
|
Reply
14
|
Amateur Creampies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from petefountain:
(uscue's Reply)
Updates are normally weekly for AmateurCreampies, HotWivesandGirlfriends, CreampieSquad, and WestCoastGangbangs but sometimes they fall a bit behind. CreampieEbony sometimes misses an update. The other sites are static or do not involve creampies.
|
02-15-09 03:57am
|
Reply
15
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Toadsith:
(uscue's Reply)
If file size is an issue, the custom clips can definitely make sense. I guess my gut reaction is along the lines of why I only listen to full music albums rather than just the tracks I initially like - the artist took time to put together the album and choose which music plays after which, and you can often learn something from their choices. I'll admit I think a lot of porn isn't made as carefully as most music albums, but I think that should explain my generalized lack of interest in the custom clip idea.
|
01-15-09 11:24am
|
Reply
16
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
The reason I really love the site is for similar reasons to Toadsith. I joined because of his review. I though he was spot on. They have truly magnificent search and navigation. Video Box getting all the dimensions wrong is a real irritation for me, and would be to any relative newcomer to internet, or a dimwit like me. I rarely disagree with the "editors choice" which picks out the best clip from a dvd. Their customer service is great. From what I've heard Video Box's is lousy. American Vice treat you like a customer, one they are pleased to do business with. With Video Box, you may as well not exist. American Vice now have nearly 1800 dvd's. Not an insignificant amount. I agree with Toadsith, in that, although they have a smaller selection, they make up for that in quality and diversity that you will not see on other dvd sites. In fact I think they have the most diverse content of any dvd site. It isn't that everything is perfect, but given the price, I think it is the best value of any site around. This allied with the feel you get from the site. They do those important things right - video content, video quality, picture perspectives correct, great personal customer service which treats you like a human being, great search and navigation, and NO dirty tricks or con jobs. Okay, not everything is perfect, but you get the feeling that they are pulling for you, rather than against you, cutting corners, or finding ways to rip you off.
|
01-15-09 07:32am
|
Reply
17
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
from Toadsith:
Having used both VideoBox and American Vice extensively, I'm amazed by your comment that VideoBox has the better search engine. American Vice's search engine is astonishingly powerful and far more adjustable than VideoBox. While superficially they behave similarly, in the fact that each suggests you choose a category and narrow it down from there, the differences are very much in the details.
Firstly, American Vice has far more specific categories than VideoBox. Secondly, when refining a search, you can remove any category from the line-up without having to clear and start over. VideoBox works on the Crumb Trail method of each category selection is laid on top of the last, so if you want to remove the first selection, you must remove all. Thirdly, American Vice allows user keyword searches to be added to the search in the same way it treats categories. This way you can add "monkey" and then "France" to the refine the search and then even decide to remove "monkey". I will grant you that American Vice's search engine has a steep learning curve, but it is worth taking the time to master it as then you will find searching their database is much better than the competing DVD sites. The only caveat is that their engine doesn't allow exclusive category selections - only inclusive. This isn't a huge negative though because none of the sites I've seen have exclusive capacity. This would be the advantage of providing a classic Boolean search engine, but most people would never figure out how to use it...
The preview options you have a point about - the screen shots are always great, but flash is easier for previewing than WMV, no doubt. And Video Box's animated screen shots are nifty, if perhaps not always placed in a useful location in the scene.
However, I truly don't understand the appeal of Video Box's custom clip feature though. Why would one want to cut a video into little pieces? Generally we are trying to avoid segmented videos in preference to single, large files. That feature has always seemed like a waste to me.
|
01-14-09 10:18pm
|
Reply
18
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
from TrashMan:
Any site that has automatic playing flash videos on their tour page needs a lot of work... :P
Looks pretty good, but looks like a small library :P.
|
01-14-09 02:52pm
|
Reply
19
|
Asian American Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(uscue's Reply)
The price has come down recently. It is now $24.99.
|
09-02-09 07:45am
|
Reply
20
|
Asian Man
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Comment
from Rick Lee:
Asian Man carries the same content but it is targeted towards a predominantly Asian audience as there are sections of the site that carry Asian American oriented discussions/themes.
|
02-17-13 02:10am
|
Reply
21
|
Backdoor Brazil
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Review
from JBDICK:
Hi uscue
I can't believe that they have Sabrina on index page 5...
she has great tits and I think is the best girls in the preview pages along with Tatiane Lemos, Ju Pantera and Emanuelle Diniz who should all be on the front area of the site.
Cinthia has nice nipples mind, like button shrooms
Thanks for the review...
|
05-02-08 01:11pm
|
Reply
22
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from rearadmiral:
(uscue's Reply)
One issue I have with the European casting sites is that so much of the setup involves the interaction between the model and the agent. If it isn't in English I find that detracts from the scene a lot. Not enough to avoid the site though, so I will have a look. Thanks for the tip.
|
01-08-14 01:40pm
|
Reply
23
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(uscue's Reply)
I had a membership there up until a couple of days ago. I'll post a review soon. I really liked the site and would recommend it. It comes as an add-on with a membership to Exploited College Girls, which is an excellent site too.
|
12-29-13 08:09am
|
Reply
24
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(uscue's Reply)
You must some kind of glitch because it's still 14.95$.
|
01-01-15 07:05am
|
Reply
25
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(uscue's Reply)
I think it did the same thing when I tried it but it doesn't now. Tt may have been a script issue in the PU/TBP link. I don't know if it's ever happen to you before but it's not too uncommon for me to click on a TBP/PU link and get sent directly to the join page instead of the main preview page(s). It's more an annoyance than anything else for me and I find the way to check out the preview section.
|
12-30-14 06:30pm
|
