| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks Denner. This site really does everything right and are worth a look.
|
07-22-12 08:16am
|
Reply
152
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(Denner's Reply)
If you've been a member of this site or network before, every once in a while they send you an offer to re-join the site at a reduced price.
I got an email yesterday to rejoin the network at $9.95/month.
And 1 or 2 months ago, I got an emailed offer to re-join at $5 for the first month. But when I got the $5 offer, I was already a member at that time.
|
07-21-12 12:14pm
|
Reply
153
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Claypaws:
"...with only two reviews."
That is the key. Top Recent sites refers only to sites reviewed in the last 90 days and only needs at least 2 reviews. If you display all top sites and alter the dropdown to "all time" it moves to position 7. If you increase the number of required reviews to 3, it drops off the list completely.
In general, you get very different lists if you play around with time frame and number of reviews.
|
07-18-12 07:50am
|
Reply
154
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Capn:
I think it is down to the consistency of the high score.
More reviews might well lower it.
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-16-12 11:13am
|
Reply
155
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from elephant:
Am I right in thinking you don't get all the other atk sites when you join one. I've seen there is some really good Zoe Kush stuff on these sites.
|
07-15-12 04:01pm
|
Reply
156
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from tangub:
You'll have to excuse me if I'm appearing a bit thick here but what is the point you're making in this comment? Are you implying that ATK Galleria doesn't deserve to be a high ranked site? Are you questioning the sincerity of the recent reviews that make it the top ranked site? Just because you may not rate the site highly doesn't mean others are not entitled to do so.
|
07-15-12 02:32pm
|
Reply
157
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
It's top rated at "TBAD" (The Best According to Drooler, LOL), and by some coincidence it's up there in the more "official" rankings.
I don't think there's a site I've rejoined more often, actually. I guess it's just my cup 'o tea. With the improvements over the past year or so, it's a top favorite.
But that's just me. Preferences do vary amongst the PUers.
|
07-15-12 02:11pm
|
Reply
158
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from exotics4me:
Denner, I don't think the amount of reviews is right. ATK Galleria made some changes around the first of the year and I think it reset their old reviews. If you notice on the TBP facts it's first listed in December 2011. Galleria has been around, I think, since around 2001. Whatever change went into effect in December 2011 has created a new page or caused the old reviews to no longer apply to it. It's pretty confusing really. This is my guess though it may be wrong. ATK launched the ATK Network, which has Galleria, Exotics, Hairy, Archives and Petites all in one package. My guess is that since it has Archives, they removed the old content from Galleria and filled the Archive site with it. Maybe since they did that, it makes ATK Galleria a "new" site since they seemed to have removed nearly all of the old low-quality content from it.
|
07-15-12 01:36pm
|
Reply
159
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from pat362:
Don't forget that it's top rated only because the default is minimum 2 reviews in the last 90 days. If you change the parameter to 3 or more reviews than the site disapears completely from the list.
I'm glad that a site which seems to have such great content gets a high score but 2 reviews will not necessarily mean that it's better than a site with 10 reviews with a lower average score. There are some sites that cater to a more selective type of customer so that those that join and review it are less likely to be disapointed and therefore are more likely to give a high score.
|
07-15-12 10:14am
|
Reply
160
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from messmer:
Well, it certainly wasn't a top rated site with me, Denner. Not that they did anything wrong it was simply as far removed from my taste as one could get.
|
07-15-12 10:01am
|
Reply
161
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Well, at least the yoga was a good pretext for oogie.
|
07-14-12 03:16am
|
Reply
162
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(Denner's Reply)
I think they decided a long time ago that since tryteens worked that they shouldn't mess with it. The better sites tend to do that. It is a pity that this may and I stress the may be the end for them.
Hopefully I'm wrong because if they aren't filming new stuff then that means another studio not hiring Eastern Europeans models and that is really bad news.
|
07-05-12 08:32am
|
Reply
163
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from dieselman:
Is this the same Denner? :) Wow, I am very happy to hear that you finally fall in love with one of our sites. WowGirls.Com is a great site indeed. )
Enjoy!
|
07-04-12 02:30pm
|
Reply
164
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from elephant:
(Denner's Reply)
I do agree here, I can watch a movie of around 600-1000 mb and it is fine and high quality, I hate these 2.5gb or more, its just one movie and might be average anyway, I'd rather it take less room from my hard drive so like around 600 mark but if looks great I might go for 1000 mark one.
|
07-03-12 08:09am
|
Reply
165
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from lk2fireone:
(Denner's Reply)
The indexes are really helpful. But I don't have the time (or money) to look at every site a model might appear. Thankfully, you join a few networks, like Diesel, Teen Mega World, some nice sites, like Metart or Femjoy, and you're almost buried alive in attractive models.
|
06-22-12 04:51pm
|
Reply
166
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
Me, too, Denner. I have missed our talks!
|
06-20-12 10:44am
|
Reply
167
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
Hi, friend Denner. Actually I subscribed (and had a review) to this site before. I was just giving it enough time to acquire some more material. It IS my kind of site. As a matter of fact it is the only one I found so far that matches my taste almost exactly. And thanks for the positive comment.
|
06-20-12 09:42am
|
Reply
168
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from ex1am:
This is an archive site for the last 2 years. I was a member about a year ago and there were no new updates. The daily update listed on the home page is false advertising meant to hook new subscribers. I agree that amourangels is the closes site for the same type of content.
|
05-30-12 06:25pm
|
Reply
169
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Monahan:
I had similar experiences. My account finally was cancelled when my credit card expired and the renewal charge was rejected.
I was OK with the site, so the involuntary renewals were not a serious problem for me.
If the good folks at Twistys keep going downhill with their support function, they will wind up as just a memory. A shame because they are still a good site for those of us who like less "edgy" sites that concentrate on lovely ladies and their body parts.
|
05-16-12 11:14pm
|
Reply
170
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Khan:
FYI ...
This site has now been added. You may enter your remarks at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/wowgirls/
Perhaps you'll be submitting a review shortly. ;)
|
04-27-12 12:11pm
|
Reply
171
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from tboy:
Yeah it's run by Diesel and it looks about 90% exclusive (I've seen a few of the sets on 18/YLP already I'm sure).
Note that it's not included in Diesel access yet and I'm not sure what the USP is compared to their other sites other than it does seem more geared towards mobile devices.
|
04-26-12 07:16am
|
Reply
172
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Ergo Proxy:
(Denner's Reply)
I really doubt it will change their pricing scheme if I join or not. Just like I wonn't save the planet if I turn my lights out overnight.
|
04-22-12 11:45pm
|
Reply
173
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Have you looked at GoddessNudes? It might have what you're after. The download speed is also a plus. It's faster than the average pay site.
|
04-22-12 11:17am
|
Reply
174
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
What about ShowyBeauty or AmourAngels? They're in the same vein. Good luck!
|
04-20-12 01:59pm
|
Reply
175
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
I stopped nearly two years ago (as per my 7/11/10 comment about their being no updates). I wouldn't bet on there being new ones.
There were also some really bad problems with the webmastering during my last time when any new content was showing. On some thumbnail pages was a mix of thumbs and actual full-sized pics which forced the browser to deal with a sudden demand of RAM to look at pages that were hard to make sense of and find links on. It was a real mess.
Besides, the new content was dwindling down to just a thing here or there over months of time.
Have you ever been to FootFetishDaily? I thought it was OK content-wise, though it was a bitch with the navigation.
|
04-19-12 11:44pm
|
