200 lb model, LOL! 'Cause it's true! After my high school sweetheart got married, saw her at the 10-year reunion. Ahh, well. Still sweet on the inside, but expanding on the outside. That tight, round little Sweet-16 ass was starting to fill out the stretch pants a bit more than asked for. Only took 12 years!
But some of the girls who used to look geeky and mousey were gettin' into their prime in their late 20's. "Hel-loooo!"
I've seen so much improvement in crispness of videos over these last sevaeral years (especially as the prices for high-end tech dropped) that I have high hopes that the technical aspects of the videos will continue to improve ALL OVER the world.
Just think, if you were in the business YOU could make better stuff than the best professionals made just a few years ago.
The director over at Mano Job says most of these guys don't like being touched by girls...he said he was surprised but I asked him to start hiring men who like females. But they do a good job there cracking the whip as much as they can.
Yeah, seriously, who is Uncle Jessie (I am trying hard not to think of "Full House")?
Plus, what exactly, besides gender, makes someone a "dirty old man"? If an eighteen year old girl does a scene with a thirty-six year old -- twice her age -- does that make him a dirty old man? I don't think so. In fact, I think it just makes him lucky, nothing else. Men are pretty much "dirty" regardless of their age, or the age difference between partners, so I really don't care. But if a woman fucks a younger man, does that then make her a dirty old woman?
I think it's easier for us younger users to complain about older men, but read Drooler's reply, and you might understand, or maybe he is just a dirty old dog instead...
"Droolers review hits it square on the head - thanks for that review, bro...."
Well, it beats falling down the stairs at 2:30 a.m. ;)
Thanks, Denner, m'man. I think the site is OK. Really, it's rather entertaining and not just a demonstration of cross-generational depravity.
I guess the only thing that I can do without are the closeups of the old coot's arse as he's going at it. Must be put in there for the female viewers, huh? Especially if they happen to be elephants.
I would have to disagree with Denner here; I like a lot of solo porn -- focusing on one model at a time -- and it is intended to be porn and nothing else.
Even though Playboy may be seen as nudity and nothing more, its intent still seems very sexual in nature, and not "art." I doubt many subscribe to or read it simply because it has good photography, or care deeply about what the models say. Yes, it is very mild by what creative perverts dream up today, but I don't think that suddenly makes it much more than good ol' smut.
The problem, of course, is that they publish a lot more than just a few photos of nude women every month, but whole articles, interviews, etc, very unrelated to porn. Honestly, I can remember more of what I read than what girls I saw last time I looked at a Playboy.
Jerry Seinfeld said that women are like works of art (and men are like jeeps) and I definitely agree, but this tatoo thing just seems addictive to some women. I suspect that some of them just look at the tats up close and show them off from that perspective, turning their bodies into actual canvases. It kind of makes sense from that overall perspective, since women go to such pains in so many other ways to make themselves attractive -- and distinctive from other women.
If two women happen to meet and are wearing the same dress, well, that's going to piss them off. But wearing the same tat? Oh, man. I'd want to be miles from the scene.
Call me a minimalist, but soft, clear (freckles OK!), smooth, supple female skin is, well, it's all that I ask! ;)
Saturday Night Live had an ad skit with Rachel Drach playing a woman who decided it was finally time to take off that 10-year-old tat above her ass -- with acid! And she screams, "Motherfuck!!" Anyway, the point was to make fun of those tats.
Yes, LSG seems to excel at marketing, but not at their product. The photosets also tend to be boring and generally below standards. The models themselves even look bored sometimes. And there's too much graininess, cropping off heads and such, long-distance shots, and darkness.
They actually had one of the best (and rare!) poses of Gina (the tall, leggy blond Czech girl who's been all over the place) face down on a couch, but they fucked it up by cutting the top of her head off. I've complained directly to them more than once about the flaws, but I might as well be saying it to the millions-of-years-old light of the stars.
They have it correct, the bonus site is Pacinosworld (And 5 other sites) not Pacinosadventures (haha I know its confusing), they're two different sites:
PacinosAdventures: That's our higher quality site, very video heavy, includes solo masturbation, lesbian, threesomes, boy/girl hardcore action. Also all exclusive. That is the site that you get all the LatinTeenPass sites included in your membership.
Pacinosworld: One of our first sites, is softcore, and not exclusive content. Has a lot of nude, solo action, some lesbian. Bonus sites included in membership is BellaSpice and MariahSpice.
Hi Denner,
Yeah we are working on making sure the Videos are better quality and glad you are seeing the difference :)
For your question about the membership, all sites gives you bonus sites, but some are more than others. Our site LatinTeenPass gives you access to 6 sites (Lazonamodelos, Pacinosworld, Spicetwins, Selenaspice, Bellaspice, and Mariahspice). What we did is for our more popular sites, we are including membership to LTP when you join the site.
Apparently I am the anti-Denner. I'm proud to say that no one has won less money with more raffle tickets than me. Damn the statistics and full engines ahead.
p.s. My lack of success at the raffle isn't what motivated me (or would motivate me) to get forum posts counted towards the raffle.
Oh yeah, can definitely relate to that. I'm sure it's fairly common for most of us to tire of seeing the same girls over and over, even when initially they are very intriguing. Hell, there are countless girls that when I first saw them I couldn't get enough of them for a few months, only now to care less completely. Short attention span perhaps, but it is what it is. That's why the current trend of releasing old material on sites bothers me quite a bit.
No way, Den Dawgy Dawg!! If I had this opportunity, I would change the world of porn so that it would make some fuckin' sense!! Would you like to have sex with Teen Topanga and nut all over her body real bad in 10 minutes if she made you do it and you could not help it?! :)
See, the industry does not understand this!! Innocent teenage pussy is TIGHT AND PRETTY!! This is too capable of messing with the mind of a man with a full testicle sack of nut and a real sensitive dickhead!! Not to mention those braces!! So why does the industry make it seem like they have no effect on a man?! It would be my pleasure to submit reviews that let the public know the industry is full of shit!!
BTW, I just used Teen Topanga as an example of serious hot teen pussy! I am aware that her websites and DVD's does not involve hardcore!! However, their are PLLEEEEENNTY of teenage girls on DVD's and the web with characteristics like her that will turn your shaft into something firemen use to put out fires!! :D
That "Fraud" choice at CCBill is vague. Who defrauded whom, and in what way? It shouldn't necessarily mean credit card fraud, either. It could be interpreted as unfounded claims made by the site. After all, it's given as a reason for quitting.
Glad to be told about your difficulties after your having made that innocent choice, but only to be forewarned.
One could simply choose it erroneously and be back on a cash lifestyle!
> I fell limited trial is a kind of a trap - and that seems like some
> kind of reason why these sites only have the limited...
Jep! Either you trust your content in means of quality and quantity which then results in a more than fair deal for those who are unsure or you only offer crap and then you'll also tend to offer limited trials. That's what I experienced.
> On the other hand I do join full trials quite a lot - at sites I never
> been before. If I like what I see, I normally go back for the full
> month deal.
I did that a few times and with sites that offer full trials I never went wrong.
Well said and it's the same for me. It's nice to imagine to be able to see (good) porn all day and to write reviews about sites but first of all it's a very private and a fun thing for me.
If I like a site and want to criticize it I'm free to do as an amateur but when working for TBP or a similar site I'd have to even though it might not be fun to me ;-)
B.t.w. thanks again for giving us the opportunity to write our own reviews!
> This has got to be based on a feeling...
Sure, but it's even more interesting to compare results of my little exercise to overall feeling of the members, isn't it?
> There are maybe over 100.000 "porn sites" on the net and about 14.000
> registered at TBP.
Come on, I don't pretend my little research to be scientific or something, it's obviously only about TGP-registered sites (though personally I have difficult time finding sites outside TBP). But it still somewhat answers a question "if you're trying RANDOM site out of TBP list, what are the chances of being scammed in some way?"
You know, it used to take me maybe a week or two to "come down" off a site or a few items that had me thrilled on one. Believe it or not, the "hammock" photoset of Sunny Leone at Mac&Bumble (she wears this little hat) and the "poolside" set of Nikki Nova at same had me crazy for days. I'd open the folders and look again and again at my favorite pictures and just marvel at them! This was in 2002.
Now, I'm like, "Hey! Wow .. but ... the photos are too small. The angle isn't good enough. There's too much light. The girl's head is cropped." Grouse grouse grouse.
So I'll admit that over the past year or so, I've done a few reviews after spending only several hours with a site, but that "cooling off," which used to take weeks, now only takes a few hours! LOL!
I like her...but I guess I don't count..I live in the UK.
on a positive note...she must be ready for porn now though...she's married some basketball guy who's 6ft 2, and with her only being 5ft 2 and weighing under 100lbs, that a whole 12 inches between them. I'd like to see her hide that differential.
I always though she was Italian but no, she's hotter than that, She's Mexican and has 3 older sisters, yeehah!!
05-10-0803:41pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
