| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from turboshaft:
(Denner's Reply)
You can get rid of your spy agencies in Denmark simply by voting them out? Sorry, but here in America voting only changes the names on the corner offices and the photos on the wall (which I have always found very creepy). The last thing any voter would be able to do is dictate the policies of the FBI or NSA or any of the other alphabet soup agencies 'protecting' us, much less get rid of them all together. Hell, if we could do that I might start voting again and get the defense budget cut by half, legalize all drugs and prostitution, outlaw the Patriot Acts and have the top officials from the last Bush administration arrested and sent to Gitmo. ; )
Oh, if only it were so...
|
03-16-10 07:22pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from turboshaft:
(Denner's Reply)
"Didn't know women have orgasms"...in porn. ; )
I just couldn't resist either, but c'mon, really? Every time a girl does a scene she lifts off at the end and produces another mind-blowing orgasm? Sorry, but I doubt it (but I can dream can't I?).
Unless she's a squirter--another controversial topic--than what exactly does she have to physically do or 'prove' the way a guy does when he, ahem, hits his mark? I understand some convulsing and screaming as if she is possessed by satan himself is to be expected in some cases, but a little light moaning and groaning and most directors seem to be satisfied. It's hard to believe that they are really climaxing that often though.
|
03-06-10 11:32am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from pat362:
(Denner's Reply)
That is one of the things that annoys me about todays porn. THey are too lazy to edit these things out or film it all over. No, they prefer to save time and keep it as is. I'm sure it happened in the past but producers and directors had too much respect about their job that they either dropped the scene or filmed it again.
|
03-03-10 06:28pm
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from RagingBuddhist:
(Denner's Reply)
You're welcome and good luck with it - let me know how it goes.
|
02-22-10 10:08am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(Denner's Reply)
You have to understand that calling it easy might be subjective. I'm no rocket scientist and I figured it out, so... I think pretty much anyone can at least do the basics with this program.
Once the program is open, you click on the Source tab and drag and drop the file to open it. Then, to cut a scene out, you go to the Cut-Edit tab. That opens a window with a slider you can use to jump to the beginning and end of the clip you want. It also has a player in it where you can, among other things, jump frame by frame to get the exact starting and stopping points you want. Click OK, go to the Format tab, choose the output file type you want (wmv, avi, mpg, etc.) Then, on to the Encode tab where you can preview what you've done before creating the final product.
All that might look complicated in print but, again, I think it's as easy as editting gets. But, as far as speed goes, video editting isn't fast - especially with high bitrate outputs. It's also heavy on system resources, so a powerful CPU and a good amount of RAM is advised.
There is a trial version, good for 14 days. The trial version also puts a watermark on the finished product. I didn't bother with it because, at the time, I was looking for an editor that would do fade-in/fade-outs and this has it. I just jumped right in. You can check it out here: http://tmpgenc.pegasys-inc.com/en/product/te4xp.html
|
02-22-10 07:40am
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from mbaya:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks for the nice words Denner. When I have more time I join more sites. It is as simple as that. I agree that the quality of the reviews is all that counts. Our most prolific reviewer is Exotics, who always writes interesting, well written reviews. I believe that Puers respect him highly and he deserves it. Also, joining networks can generate a lot of reviews in a short time. I seriously think that questions like this one come from a lack of appreciation for the effort it takes to write quality reviews.
|
02-14-10 10:46am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from turboshaft:
(Denner's Reply)
I would say that your first paragraph can also apply to men, though I bet most of us are far too 'manly' to admit it.
I am not saying men and women are alike in this regard but I think, at least in the West, that cultures have some pretty screwed up ideas about sexuality or at least in terms of how rigidly we feel we have to define it.
For example, If you are a male heterosexual then there is a sort of list of unwritten rules that you are expected to follow with the opposite sex, and engaging in a number of activities--even solely with the opposite sex--is strictly forbidden. Just think of the number of times you've dismissed something as 'gay' despite the fact that it would be with someone of the opposite sex. Wouldn't a man doing something with a woman already be defined as straight?
The same is true of women and homosexuals, though I would argue gays are a little more open minded as few societies in the modern world truly accept gay people as equally as they do straight people and thus they are not as worried about what rules and norms they are expected to follow in order to please the society.
But back to the question, I would say "Only a few are" but defining "few" very loosely as I don't think anyone knows about "all women" and the question is a little absolute in that regard. Maybe I'm just fantasizing here, but I am sure there at least a few who are truly comfortable with both men and women and wouldn't have it any other way, but the vast majority would define their sexuality as either gay or straight.
|
02-10-10 05:18pm
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from turboshaft:
(Denner's Reply)
I'm still worried about the mainstreaming of porn. Don't get me wrong; I want all the legal and social protections possible but I don't necessarily want everyone into it as much I am. I think this ends up making porn more generic and also more stupider--think BangBros and you might understand what I'm getting at.
Part of what I like about porn is that it is not totally accepted or at least not totally loved by the society at large. Granted this has its risks like legal snafus and restrictions that end up negatively affecting other parts of society but I still like to think that I am part of a small but strong minority rather than just another big meaningless group. This is probably why I can't stand things like Playboy or porn awards and sales figures.
I guess this means porn really hasn't changed my attitude of even the most attractive females I meet because you don't know whether the subject of porn or a viewpoint influenced by it is going to get you a nice warm hug or a swift punch in the face.
|
02-05-10 10:57am
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Monahan:
(Denner's Reply)
Ditto.
And the same for those who "retired" that still have new stuff getting posted.
There's a chance that her stuff will go poof forever and that would be something I would not be happy with.
No, nothing, other than me going blind or dying, would ever cause me to stop checking out what I have on my favorites.
|
01-21-10 03:44pm
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Well, I suppose there's a niche market for glassware that would serve the purpose. I tried searching the web for such a thing. And I used Google! (sounds of spanking self)
The only thing I could find remotely matching it was the "Reflux Reaction Cum Distillation Unit," which sounds more like a prostitute after a particularly long night on the job.
|
01-20-10 02:13pm
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(Denner's Reply)
Sweet babe.
Hope she doesn't get aftermarket boobs.
|
01-16-10 12:52pm
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from PinkPanther:
(Denner's Reply)
Oh, yes!
|
01-15-10 05:29pm
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(Denner's Reply)
Denner Said: "There's NO reason why PU can not go forward in fighting child-pornography."
Perhaps you missed the text/link at the bottom of EVERY page here at PU where it says ...
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
In case you weren't aware ... ASACP stands for "Adult Sites Against Child Pornography"
|
01-13-10 09:08am
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Actually, all of that porn librarian stuff is really just my way of maintaining neuroplasticity. It's Brain Fitness, Ze Dwoolah Style!
|
01-06-10 04:41pm
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(Denner's Reply)
When a guy does a gorgeous babe for far longer than I ever could, then for the guy to find it necessary to jerk himself off for a "money shot" is a major turn-off for me.
I didn't much like John Leslie as a person (he was always nasty to the female talent), but I aqdmired how Leslie always splattered (back, ass or pubic area) as he pulled it out of the babe's cunt. He never had to fuck his fist to ejaculate.
That tells me he was really into the fuck and not just going through the motions.
As for where the guy splats, the only two places that make any sense are inside (creampie) or on her back or her pubic area. I don't see anything at all erotic about a mouth or tit splat (other than the possible humiliation factor, which also turns me off).
|
01-03-10 10:36am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from asmith12:
(Denner's Reply)
> Fun poll, asmith - It makes you kind of nostalgic.
I didn't think about this side when submitting it, but you're right - when reading it, it IS kind of nostalgic :-).
|
12-23-09 12:49am
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Have I seen her somewhere (if only briefly)? ;)
The updates at eurobabeindex aren't always up-to-date, I've noticed; hence the 3-year-old "newbie" you've noted. At least they're trying to give as much info as possible on everyone they can. Damn, that IS a lot of women to keep track of!
(I Love EBI! Holds sign while sitting naked.)
|
11-29-09 10:03am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from james4096:
(Denner's Reply)
yeah it was called Be the Mask. Never joined. I think it was mostly fake with a few average joes thrown in who made it through casting.
|
11-12-09 07:38am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from ControllingMind:
(Denner's Reply)
I always thought that when you joined a site either on a non-recurring membership or cancelled a recurring account, that your details were then removed from the automated billing database. So further charges should never really happen.
It was also videosZ who I was talking about. They have since changed their billers I think to epoch, ccbill or EUsegpay. Maybe they became aware of mistakes and changed their billing services.
|
10-29-09 10:06am
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
Hi Denner, I don't recall the exact way I went about encrypting the external but if you follow True Crypts instructions you can't go wrong. Just make sure your hard drives are plugged in at the time you start and that you create a "container" on an external device when it asks what you want to do. If I recall correctly you have two options, either use only part of the hard drive or encrypt the whole thing. The ideal thing, this is what I did, is to encrypt the whole drive while it is still empty because it has to do a format. So, if you have material on your external already either create a partition and use only part of it or shift whatever you have temporarily to your computer, format and then put it back in the now encrypted drive. Confusing I know but that's basically what I recall. Best to follow directions, they give you plenty of warning if you're about to do something wrong! So read carefully! :-)
|
10-27-09 10:28am
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
It's harder to "do lunch at the Y" than it is to fuck, it seems. For one thing, you just can't hit the spot the right way at the right time it seems, with some girls anyway. And then there are other things that make it a challenge, such as "bad flavor" that makes you want to ask: "Don't you ever clean that thing?"
Once a girlfriend persuaded me to "wear the red badge of courage." That's not just lust. It's love!
Anyway, I now realize I just should have put "perform oral sex" instead of "give head."
|
10-26-09 01:40pm
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from monty2222:
(Denner's Reply)
Completely in agreement.
Besides even if I wanted to, the visitors are there to see me and my significant other, am I just going to leave the guests at the coffee table in order to go and watch porn...
|
10-26-09 10:54am
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Somehow reading your reply got me thinking that the question would have been better posed as this: "If all but one of the following in a photoset were lacking to your tastes, which would make the most difference to you?"
I don't know if I could have gone that long with the question, but that would have given in more "focus."
For me, it's the model poses.
|
10-20-09 11:57am
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Zappa! Had a friend who turned me on to Zappa and had that Fillmore album. Material from Hot Rats, Burnt Weeny Sandwich, etc. Yes, that stuff comes but once!
|
06-03-09 03:33pm
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from TalonIcefire:
(Denner's Reply)
I'm gonna have to agree with both Denner and Drooler. Watersports, Bukkake, Feces swap (really don't know what it's called). Additionally, I could care less about high heels. I mean come on now, what's the point...
|
04-18-09 03:53am
|
