Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Dylan Ryder
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Pictures available
- Some hd content
- Um... Let me think... No download limits? Yeah. No download limit. |
| Cons: |
- Small site
- No longer updating
- Most videos are low quality |
| Bottom Line: |
Boy, I sure do like Dylan Ryder. Sure the fake breasts take away from the overall glamour of such an attractive woman, but I understand the direction the adult industry has gone. Hey, maybe since this is Dylan Ryder's official site there will be lots of content with her natural breasts and maybe some hair down... Oh, wait. Nevermind. I forgot that the Openlife.com network doesn't really do content or updates.
Let's see, the last update is listed as 2013.
Content-wise, there are 25 or so hi definition clips out of the 60-ish video total on the site. There's a decent mix of solo, lesbian, and M/F, but there are still only 60 or so clips available, and more than half are low quality. And when I say low quality I don't mean not HD. I mean early 2000s dial-up thumbnail gallery advertisement quality. The content may be exclusive, but I'm guessing you'd do much better spending your $20 at bang.com (40 Dylan Ryder clips listed) where you also get a few thousand other actresses on the network, too.
It looks like there are fewer than 20 photo sets. It's a shame because some of the photo sets are very well done. Most are glam sets and the approach really suits her. She's a very attractive, very nicely shaped older woman who should do more of this work. The sets are available for downloading as zip files, too.
I don't think that's enough to warrant a recommendation, but the photos are solidly in the "pro" column. It's just a shame that something that should be a given on an adult site has to be marked as a "pro" and focused on so heavily because other "pro" things are so hard to come by when reviewing the site.
Recommendation? Avoid. |
|
03-13-18 08:19am
Replies (1)
|
Review
27
|
Erotica X
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cheap, especially with $5 promo in your spam box.
All clips are available to download in everything from low res up to 1080p formats.
Good speeds.
Decent couples scenes if you and your significant other are into that.
No download limits and download managers work. |
| Cons: |
Small site. At the time of this writing there are 22 pages with four videos on each page, so under 100 clips total.
Three BIG "trusted partners" ads on the bottom of each page, and that's 10 points off the score immediately. |
| Bottom Line: |
Not a bad site, but not when scenes are compared to some similar ones on their Mile High Media sister site. Plus you get the added benefit of having hundreds and hundreds of other clips for the same price as Erotica X, because you and your partner may want to warm up with a nice candlelit romance one Tuesday evening but a raunchy three-way after a few glasses of wine on Saturday.
It's a small and okay site, but, honestly, it could just as easily be a "romantic" section in the total Mile High Media (or some other Fame) collection and not an entirely separate website. |
|
03-25-15 08:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Euro Angels
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
$5 promos come in your email spam folder.
Interesting variety. European women, panty cumshots, anal, shemales, etc.
Reliable, easy to navigate, and no captcha. Just a simple login button.
I didn't encounter any download limits.
Multiple streaming and download options.
Good download speeds. Saturated my DSL connection every time. |
| Cons: |
Wow at the focus on anal sex/play and degrading blowjobs (Could be a pro for some)
Weird encoding. One video at 540p may be 400mb while 720p is 1.5gb and 1080p is nearly 3gb, and another video may be 400mb/700mb/1.2gb for the same choices.
Lots of shared videos between separate sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Decent quality/speeds/selection/etc, especially if you get in on one of their $5 email promos, but:
The network portrays itself as MUCH larger than it is, and that's why I couldn't give it an 80. There are 20+ other sites included, but many of the videos are shared between three or more sites.
Newer videos offer 720p and 1080p download choices, but, for collectors just wanting to maximize quantity and value, the sweet spot looks to be the 540p (web HD) choice. The quality is good while being half the size of the 720p and much smaller than the 1080p.
Download managers work but the network will log you out every few hours and you'll end up with a text or html file in place of the videos. Be sure to save your download list to resume.
Euro Angels itself isn't too bad, but I can't stress enough just how much of the network's focus is on anal, ATM, and sloppy blowjobs. The lack of balance was a negative for me, but it could be a positive for some.
It's worth $5 if you're considering it, even if it's just to grab a few of your favorite actresses. |
|
03-20-15 07:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Evil Angel
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Big names like Veronica Avluv, India Summer, etc., and less known actresses as well.
- High production values (very much not a romance site, fwiw)
- Attractive models doing raunchy things
- Great value. Lots of content on each site plus additional large network access
- Good PU discount
- Download managers work
- Photos available |
| Cons: |
- Niche. Be sure you're into what they're offering
- Doesn't seem as responsive with more than one tab opened
- Photos zips are huge.
- Videos seem to be padded a bit with BTS and "best of" style compilations here and there, but still an enormous network. |
| Bottom Line: |
Very much a gonzo network.
Enjoy anal, choking, matted-hair, running mascara, etc? Enjoy spit, gagging, ATM, stuff coming out of throats and noses, feet-on-head during the anal sex (even when it's lesbians using strapons) in your adult films? Like a few shemales alone or with men and women here and there? This is the network for you.
The site/network will log you out every so often. I couldn't see a particular pattern, but you'll want to check in every so often if you're hoping to grab some videos with a manager.
The video quality is good to excellent, although I didn't see any 4K. That's not an issue for me, but the highest offering I saw was 1080p. One of the best things about the network is that most of the newer clips are offered in everything from 160p to 1080p for download. I thought the 540p offered the best size/quality tradeoff, and the HD clips often weren't significantly better looking to justify the three or five times size differences. The older clips might only be in 360 or 480, but that's fairly acceptable considering their age.
Production values are generally high in the newer scenes.
Actress-wise, There are some good scenes with stars like Lou Charmelle, Courtney Cummz, Dana Vespoli, and others. BUT, if you see an actress you like, you'd best want to see her doing some pretty degrading stuff. If that doesn't float your boat, reconsider pursuing your favorite actress on this network. Again, anal is ever-present, as are choking, gagging, drooling, etc.
There were some surprises in the actress list, too. It was nice to discover some unknown work by Jessica Nyx, Alysha Rylee, and others. It's always pleasant to stumble across those kinds of things at a site you were visiting almost entirely because of previously unknown work by another actress.
There are photos and photo zips available, but the sizes seem way too big for what they are. 300MB for a set wasn't uncommon, but 50MB would've been more appropriate for something that is essentially complimentary to the video. The lighting in the photos was worse as well, and often too dark. It was a strange contrast to the overly-bright videos.
Bottom line- Anal. Choking. Drooling. Running mascara. Sound good? Join. |
|
11-07-16 09:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Fake Hub
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Multiple download options. Most videos offer small but decent quality .flv, 720p .wmvs, and a medium quality .flv that splits the difference. Some offer more in-between options.
- 720p videos for most if not all of the shoots
- Streaming doesn't count against the 20gb/day download limits.
- A few pros, but mostly girl (and some boy) next door types.
- Very attractive models (majority European) and a few fairly plain ones.
- Decent acting, although it probably helps that I don't speak the language.
- Frequent internal cumshots |
| Cons: |
- Downloads limited to 20gb per day (again, streaming apparently doesn't count against it)
- No indicator showing what you've used or when the limit clock resets. Midnight? Noon? The hour and minute you joined? Who knows.
- The 720p videos don't really look all that great. They're okay, but very few of them seem worth the massive size, and there are often artifacts. Considering the size and download restrictions, they don't make too much sense to download unless it's a model you really like.
- Subtitles take up room on the screen
- Ads after you get inside.
- Banner at the bottom of some of the standard definition .flv clips that are available for download saying something along the lines of "this is a low quality clip from fakehub.com, to get the HD version..." |
| Bottom Line: |
First thing - I subtract 5 points immediately if there are ads after the login page, and there are three in a row similar in dimensions to the clickable videos. They're at the bottom and not easy to click on, but I still paid to get in and I don't need or want advertisements, especially when there is already a "promos" link at the top that takes you to a page of ads. I'm fairly okay with that one since it's not obtrusive and they are offering discounts, but I greatly dislike constant advertising within a paysite, even if you have to scroll down to see it.
-
Overall the fakehub network is pretty good. I'm not a huge fan of the "fake" premise, but it has quite a few videos starring Zuzana Z and Szilvia Lauren, and I am a huge fan of both of them. So I joined.
There are three "fake" scenarios. A doctors office, a taxi, and modeling interviews.
-
The doctors office is the weakest, mostly because of the attempt at replicating a hidden camera. If that's your thing, that's fine, but the problem is that it is mixed with decent non-hidden camera clips, but not when you may want them. You'll get a hidden camera scene of oral sex and you can't really see too much, but a standard video clip of intercourse clearly showing the small of her back. And then it's back to hidden cameras for the finale. Puzzling, but, again, not my thing, and it may be exactly what others like.
No real point in choosing the downloadable HD videos for this scenario that I could tell.
These are mostly male doctor and female patient, and occasionally female nurse and female patient. I don't think I saw any male patient female nurse scenes, although I didn't look too hard.
My suggestion? Offer both hidden and non-hidden videos for the same scene. You've obviously got them, and making them available doubles (triples) your video content for the site.
-
The next scenario is the taxi. A driver picks up a passenger, something happens to require the rider to show her breasts/give oral sex/have sex/etc. to "pay" for the ride.
It's okay, although the occasional enormous "FAKETAXI.com" sticker in the rear glass of the vehicle pretty much dispels any illusion.
Again, the HD scenes are dark and grainy and not really worth downloading unless you like the specific model.
Not too bad overall, though.
-
The fake modeling agency is the best of the bunch.
A male or female "scout" interviews models, gets them naked, takes some photos, and explains that more detailed photos and videos are required to see how the prospective model will perform for the clients.
The male scout interacts with females, while the female scout (Zuzanna, Szilvia, Barra, and Jane, a gorgeous brunette MILF) then interacts with both men and women, and occasionally a male scout will join the FF scenes as well.
I'd imagine it's because of the controlled environment and decent lighting, but these offer the network's better HD scenes.
* edit* forgot that there's a public version as well. Things happen in public-ish area after an "agent" approaches potential talent, often filmed at night or in darker locations.
-
What would I recommend to make it better?
- A limit counter or at least some indication of when the clock resets.
- Get rid of the banners on the standard definition .flv files.
- Photo options.
- Consider offering surprise bi-mmf scenarios with the female agent interviews as well. The setup would be essentially the same as the MFF scenes that are already being done, and it's an underserved niche and could easily be incorporated and draw more customers. Implement a similar scheme as tainster's "fully clothed" offerings so that you offer exactly the same scene with two different outcomes/sites and people who were/weren't interested could choose accordingly.
-
Would I recommend it? Probably. It has some things I dislike and a few disappointments, but it's worth a look if you can find a deal. |
|
04-22-15 08:24am
Replies (1)
|
Review
31
|
Futanaria
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Real life weird Japanamation fetish come to life!
- Meets a particular genre
- Some fairly popular models at times
- Less erotic but more realistic than straponcum.com
- Pictures and videos.
- Download managers work, no download limits.
- HD and SD .wmv and .mp4. HD looks pretty decent and is reasonably sized.
- Good download speeds saturated my DSL |
| Cons: |
- Deceptive bait and switch of available videos. Caveat emptor. More below.
- Slow updates. They release photos, then days or weeks later they'll release the corresponding video.
- Overpriced at $30. The $15 rebill ( and with such infrequent updates I have no idea why ANYONE would do that) is much more realistic and would have more people re-joining.
- Pretty darn specialized fetish and definitely not for everyone. But hey, that can be said for any fetish. Different strokes, etc.
- Camera angles don't seem to be much of a consideration.
- Nothing fancy regarding the site itself. If you like flashy you're in the wrong spot.
- Some models aren't very attractive, and the style of filming/clothing doesn't help.
- No zip files for photos. |
| Bottom Line: |
I liked the site
BUT
- Quite a few of the videos are pretty ridiculous (exercise ball sized breasts and/or a prosthetic penis the size of two fire extinguishers laid end to end and/or two or three dicks sprouting from the same girl). But hey, the premise is pretty ridiculous to begin with and I'm sure someone likes it, so this fulfills that demand.
- Some well known models including India Summer, Alex Chance, Abby Cross, Alexis Monroe, Alison Pierce and others working under silly names like "Zoey Zipperripper" are on the site. A real-name reference (I think it's run by the same folks) can be found at http://futanaria.ws/category/real-names/
- Don't expect much in the way of cinematography. Most scenes are filmed from one or two stationary tripods.
- The worst part is how they present their available content. Go ahead, click on the link taking you to the site.
Now go to "see all scenes" at the bottom right of the page after clicking through the content warning page.
It looks like there are five pages of ~75 videos available for download when you're initially clicking through the site and considering joining, doesn't it? After all, you're "seeing all scenes," right? Now scroll all the way down to the bottom and be sure to catch that little "Note: Older videos are rotated offline and can be purchased at Radrotica.com" text.
Now go to radrotica in a new tab (keep futanaria.com open) and see what their latest futanaria video available for purchase is. Remember the name and go back to page 1 of futanaria.com's "see all scenes." You're probably still at the bottom of the page, so scroll up. Up. Up some more. Up. Keep going. Are you around halfway yet? Okay, start looking for the name of the scene that is available for purchase at radrotica.
Everything past that isn't available for download unless you pay them $3-$5 per clip at a different website.
Now go ahead and count up what IS available for download out of those five enormous pages of clips.
It's less than 40, isn't it? 40 clips out of the 300+ shown are available for you to download with your paid subscription.
Again, it's not a bad site and definitely fills a niche, but it's extremely deceptive and pretty overpriced for what you're allowed to see of their library.
I gave it a 70 because it's such an exclusive niche and the videos aren't horrible, but everything good about the site only brings it up to a 70 since the deceptive available library nonsense easily knocks 40 or 50 points off. |
|
02-17-16 11:00am
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Girlfriends Films
(0)
66.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Large site with lots of content
- Big name actresses
- Hidden gems are there waiting to be discovered (Jayma Reid, tons of Prinzess, Elexis Monroe, etc.)
- Download managers allowed |
| Cons: |
- Video quality is absolutely horrible. The top offering often looks like what you'd watch on free popup-filled tube sites, and sometimes worse. More below.
- Logs you out a couple of times a day and you have to enter captcha to re-enter
- Dead links, repeated names, poor oversight of website
- Most video sizes are huge for such low-quality clips.
- Scenes are often fairly uninspired
- No photo options (view or download) that I could find |
| Bottom Line: |
If you've seen any of the Mother Daughter Exchange Club clips you may understand why I was excited about this membership. They have 30 pages (w/30+ clips per page) of content going back to 1999 available on the site, so it held a lot of promise.
Sadly, it lasts right up until a day or two after you join. There were some technical issues like dead links, but those things happen occasionally and can be overlooked. The big problem was much more obvious.
There are lots of talented and attractive actresses, but often the scenes are underwhelming. Too often they come across as actresses getting paid to say these specific lines and lick these specific parts. That would be okay if the details were filmed better and showed more of the action, but unfortunately that doesn't happen very much, either. It ended up being a tremendous disappointment, and the reason is simple: The quality of the majority of their clips is pitiful, and it makes the entire site such a letdown that you'll probably stop visiting it less than halfway through your membership period.
Example:
One would hope the site has access to the source material for the films, but even if they don't I'm fairly certain the company has access to at least one copy of the DVDs they are making available for download. We'll use MDEC #6 for this. There are four clips offered, with the 360p options averaging 500MB or so. The 480p options are around 1GB each.
Don't miss that: A ~30 minute 480p option is one gigabyte.
Remember, the DVD itself would only be 4.5GB, but they have DVD or near-DVD sized files while still looking like free tube site videos. This makes no sense considering the DVDs are sharp and clear, and a quick google search would yield tons of free rippers that would convert the entire movie to 700MB and probably still end up with better quality.
(And who knows what professional options are available for ripping those same DVDs to offer on the site.)
Instead you get dark, bad-looking individual clips at 500MB-1GB that you'll probably only watch to see a favorite actress, and then it will be deleted and/or forgotten about soon after because it's simply not worth re-watching.
Of the 30+ pages of content, only the five or so most recent pages offer HD. FWIW, even those HD clips are way too big (2GB 720p scenes)
There is quite a bit of tribbing and old/young matchups, but eroticism is often lacking. Another problem is lack of attention to lighting and what is happening in the scene. Masturbation or oral action is often blocked, and when it is open and visible it's difficult to see because the lighting is usually fair to poor. Combine the lighting choices with bad encoding and you'll end up regretting downloading most of the scenes you decided to get.
Again, it's especially sad to realize you could just as easily have been offered the entire DVD at better quality and a similar size to one of the crappy 360p clips.
FWIW, I've seen clips for sale at VOD sites, so I'm fairly certain decent, and likely even high, quality examples exist.
Bottom line: The site has so much potential. Newer videos, while still overly huge, are okay quality-wise, but the total content isn't worth it. If you do join I'd probably suggest only downloading clips from 2015 and on, but so much content is excluded with that caveat that it saddens me to say I probably wouldn't recommend joining in the first place. You're likely better off finding the actresses you enjoy and just buying the single scene or the cheap DVD they're in. |
|
12-09-16 01:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
Girlsway
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Big name actresses and some less well-known performers
- No download limits
- Good production values
- Clean actresses in tasteful settings and clothing. Or not, depending on the story requirements.
- Multiple download formats/sizes
- Photos available for viewing and downloading |
| Cons: |
(All fairly minor complaints overall from a person who thinks he's usually overly critical)
- Large-ish, but not huge, site that's still growing.
- Some scenes seem a bit repetitive, but that's likely unavoidable considering the content.
- Logouts/captcha logins.
- Fake tits and tattoos, but that's the state of the industry these days.
- Videos sometimes shot intentionally in lesser quality just to promote a particular fantasy. Explanation below. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'd joined almost entirely to add to a certain actress' collection, and this site has been one of the most pleasant surprises I've discovered in a very long time. The scenes are filmed well, the lighting is good, the action is visible without being noticeably direct (legs or arms aren't at odd angles just so the camera can get a shot), and there is even a bit of acting here and there.
The thing that surprised me the most was how much many of the videos reminded me of older Sapphic Erotica scenes before the site lost some of its mojo. Remember back when the scenes would have eroticism, tribbing, entire-mouth-on-labia deep sucking, and somewhat forceful, involved oral sex between the women? Remember seeing clips and the entire thing seemed fairly believable? That's what quite a few of the Girlsway scenes reminded me of. There is sexual energy in a lot of these videos that rivals those old SE clips. I'm sure that's in large part because of directing, and kudos to the people responsible. Keep it up.
One of the better premises and filming techniques is the lesbian POV scenes, but they're a bit worse than they should be because often they switch to the POV perspective by showing what they film with the ipad or whatever tablet they're holding in the scene. While this is true to the fantasy aspect of the girls filming themselves with the device, it's a bit jarring to go from a crisp HD image to what appears to be a less-than-HD, or at least a less-HD, video setting (not to mention one would think the devices would look much better than what is presented). I appreciate the idea of giving the POV angle a bit of graininess for the sake of the fantasy, but it's sort of disappointing to have a POV scene of a favorite actress pleasuring another gorgeous woman and not have every available pixel working to its fullest to show what's happening.
And then there are other clips where the site truly shines. One memorable example is a scene with Mindi Mink and (IIRC) Samantha Hayes that is probably worth the price of admission. The two seem to actually enjoy themselves, and the oral attention given to Mink is not only convincing and enthusiastic, but also filmed in a way that shows Hayes' long hair falling onto the stomach and hairy pubic mound of Mink. Those are the types of inspired scenes and small touches that make this site worth joining.
Bottom line- I'm surprised at how good this site was, and I'm sure most of the credit for that goes to whoever is in charge of directing the scenes. If you have any interest in girl-girl scenes involving beautiful college-aged women (which seems a bit silly to even write, doesn't it?) and the occasional MILF thrown into the mix, have a look at this site.
Would I recommend? Absolutely. |
|
12-02-16 05:26pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
34
|
Hanna Hilton
(0)
56.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Some decent resolution photos with the video sets.
- Even better, photo sets in zip files for the ones I checked.
- Seems large-ish for an Open Life Network site. |
| Cons: |
- Access/uptime is spotty. "Error 521 web server is down".
- Lots of filler behind-the-scenes/masturbation type clips.
- "Large" for an Open Life Network site still only means 50 or so videos.
- Crappy video resolution on the few samples I checked. |
| Bottom Line: |
This seems like one of the larger Open Life sites. Don't misunderstand and think that's a recommendation or that this is some great, huge thing that deserves your money. Just that, when compared to the other tiny cash grab sites on their network, this one seems like a larger one.
I found the site down a couple of times. Not a huge deal, but also not something you like to see as a paying customer.
The worst part of the site is the low resolution videos. This appears to be a common problem with most, if not all, Open Life Network sites, and part of the reason I found it appropriate to review each individually. Someone joining Hannah Hilton might not check the broad network review, much less Ashley Fires, Abbey Brooks, etc., to know that each site is almost complete crap. Hannah Hilton is no different. There are some photos, and some decent photos, but the majority of the videos are borderline unwatchable. Maximum 360p clips are definitely unacceptable on a paysite in 2017, and of the three samples I grabbed (random video from page one, random one from middle of page list, and random video from last page), all of them were 360p. So yes, there are quite a few videos of the lovely Ms. Hilton available, but none are worth the time or effort to watch unless you're a HUGE fan or just like video quality from around 1998 or so.
There are ads on the site behind the paywall, but you discover you don't care because there's not really much to keep you coming back to the site, anyway.
There are quite a few photos sets, and the ones I saw had zip files available for downloading. That's nice, but it's not enough to justify spending any money or time at the site.
That's probably the ultimate bottom line, now that I think about it. I usually try to type out a summary, but I think that's it. Some good photo sets, but not worth the price of admission.
Very disappointing. Avoid. |
|
10-31-17 02:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Hard X
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Good lighting, video quality, etc.
- No download limits that I encountered
- Multiple video sizes available for download
- Big names and up-and-comers.
- Decent mixture of white and non-white actresses
- The anal isn't the degrading foot-on-her-head gonzo style that is so popular these days. |
| Cons: |
- Checkbox cross-sales when subscribing (webmasters, is that one-time $30 or so worth a user never, ever subscribing to any of your sites again?)
- Anal in almost every scene, although that's probably a pro for some. "Hard" in this usage = anal.
- Photos intermittently available for downloading. Seems odd for such a new and well-designed/planned site. |
| Bottom Line: |
A good looking, responsive, polished site featuring attractive women having anal sex or being gangbanged. I'd guess there are 200 or so videos. There is a decent mixture of college aged women and MILFs. Occasional tattoos but not really prominent. The same with fake tits (why, ladies?). There is some running mascara here and there, but even the gangbangs didn't really strike me as gonzo-style porn.
If you're not into anal/DPs/gangbangs you'll get bored pretty quickly. I'd guess there were only a dozen or so videos out of what I glanced at that didn't involve anal sex, and it makes one wonder the "analx.com" domain was already taken when this site was developed.
Video download options went from small portable-friendly clips to 1080p with four or five options in between, and even the middle option (540p) looks very good considering the size and quality tradeoffs compared to the larger HD files. Kudos to the site for this.
I think offering a "best of" HD clip of the major points or finale similar to what Naughty America and Team Skeet provide would be beneficial to this site. Offering a clip with the anal and ATM edited out might increase appeal to more subscribers as well.
Would I recommend? If you're into anal, yes. It's an attractive, well-done site with high quality videos. |
|
09-22-16 05:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Harmony Vision
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Attractive models
- Epoch as biller
- Photos available for some sets
- Quite a bit of fetish variety. DPs, rubber, dungeons, etc. |
| Cons: |
- Definitely a pornstar site. Fake tits, tattoos, etc.
- Frequent logouts, have to go through captcha to get back in
- Photos intermittently available. When clicking the "download" link for a set's photos I was redirected back to the homepage on more than one occasion.
- Questionable lighting choices in a lot of scenes. S&M = abuse your eyes.
- Download managers work, but are kind of pointless since the links die when the site logs you out after letting you get two clips.
- No distinguishing names for videos. You'll have a folder full of "scene_sd_high" clips and no idea what's in any of them.
- Models listed but have no scenes
- Missing videos |
| Bottom Line: |
Lots of decent content but a fairly irritating site. Better overall than Stiffia.com, but still obviously a stiffia site because of site decisions.
Possibly the first time I've seen interactive S&M. You're part of the action as you realize your eyes are hurting from bad lighting and poor focus in many of the scenes.
Click on a scene and you'll get four video download options, but there is little to no rhyme or reason regarding sizes. Some 1080p clips will be 2GBs, and other similar-length 1080p clips will be 500MB. It doesn't make any sense, and the video quality isn't drastically better between the clips, either.
Some download links will be missing after you click on them. ipod, SD, 720p, and 1080p will all be offered, but 720p might have nothing there.
You'll be logged off fairly often as well. I'd estimate I could download two or three 500MB scenes before getting kicked out and needing to re-login to the site I paid for.
"Size mismatch" errors when trying to download videos.
Bottom line: Maybe join if you get a discount and see something you need to complete a collection, but expect to be irritated and disappointed. |
|
10-07-16 02:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
HDV Pass
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1920 x 1080 videos.
No sneaky checkmarked gotcha! boxes on the credit card page when initially signing up.
Website is pretty responsive while you're repeatedly logging back in.
Offers streaming.
Seymore Butts' site is included but not the focus of the review (only showing four videos with Shane, btw). |
| Cons: |
It logs you out every ten minutes if you're downloading videos, and you have to enter captcha to get back in. It doesn't force you to log back in as frequently if you're only streaming the videos.
Download managers don't work. Let me rephrase: Queuing doesn't work, and if you try to download two videos at the same time one or both will usually fail. LOADS of 416 errors, and downloads don't resume where failed.
Downloads seem to fail 25%-40% of the time. Example: http://imgur.com/2hoHW5x
If you try to download two videos you are no longer able to view any pages on the website. Too many connections, I suppose.
Put simply, you can download whatever videos you're willing to start, restart, babysit, re-enter captcha, restart, etc.
Poor lighting and many washed-out scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is pretty vanilla stuff and not worth the time and trouble for the too-few videos you're allowed to download.
If your focus is on streaming you may be more pleased with it, but there are still too few videos and too much trouble when sites like videobox exist.
*** Revised on the 8th. My initial review was too harsh, and I've taken the score from a 65 to a 69. |
|
03-07-14 11:24am
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
Housewife 1 On 1
(0)
51.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Good looking mostly MILFs in nice clothes and/or lingerie
- Multiple download formats (that, technically, you won't be able to access/download)
- Epoch is apparently really good about refunding disappointed subscribers' fees. |
| Cons: |
- Bait and switch.
- Actually, not really any switch. Just bait.
- It is apparently possible to join a Naughty America site and not have access to any videos. Link below. |
| Bottom Line: |
AVOID AVOID AVOID
This is no longer a clone site, but as many people as possible should be steered away from Naughty America since their switch to their new subscription... no, not subscription. Billing... something. I'm still not sure how to phrase that because most people expect that a subscription will give them access to the content they thought they were subscribing to.
Guess what? Naughty America is getting all M. Knight Shyamalan and subverting your expectations with what you thought you wanted to do with your money. Yep, it turns out Bruce Willis was dead the entire time, and you'll want to watch how this movie ends, too. So far they've gone from complete network access to access of one site's content ONLY if it's less than a month old, and now they've switched to what appears to be no site content whatsoever unless it just happens to pop up in the roll of the dice for the daily updates that they let you see but that have nothing to do with your subscription (updates is used loosely, btw, since most of the "updates" you are allowed to view appear to be old videos).
Housewife 1 on 1 is still updating and shows new content as recently as September 5th, 2018. BUT, you apparently can't access it after you pay your money and subscribe to the site. What you'll get is random videos from other Naughty America sites (and, in fairness, possibly one or two videos from Housewife 1 on 1, but they'll be the result of completely random chances exactly like all the other videos), with the chance to buy ANOTHER subscription to super subscribe to the site you thought you'd just paid $20 to subscribe to. But you didn't. You paid the entry fee to have access to the upgrade, and, after you pay the additional subscription fee to the site you just subscribed to, THEN you'll get to access the videos on the site you subscribed to.
No, really. I'm not joking. Read it again if it doesn't make sense.
What you do get is just random videos from the Naughty America hard drive. It's this part on the signup page, btw:
"Updated daily with exclusive videos from our library."
Yes, that reads like they are creating so much content that there are daily updates, but scroll down some more to find this one:
"Membership Upgrades Available Inside!"
And that's exactly what they mean.
Go read the Naughty America forums. They're open to the public. You'll find lots of stuff like this from yesterday (9-9-18): " What did I just pay for? $24.99. cant access ANY scenes."
https://forums.naughtyamerica.com/topic/34458-what-did-i-just-pay-for-2499-cant-access-any-scenes/
AVOID AVOID AVOID |
|
09-10-18 07:06pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
Jim Slip
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Underserved niche
- Decent personalities
- Simple but decent production values with the newest videos
- Laura, Jim's wife, films and joins in at times
- Emphasis on different outfits.
- .zip files of photos. |
| Cons: |
- Older videos are poor quality and not worth the time or trouble to investigate.
- Videos are all named the same thing, so you'll end up with a pile of dozens of "540p_fullcomplete" (an example, I don't recall the exact naming scheme) with no idea who is in any of them.
- Videos are split in half so that one full clip will be cut and used as two updates.
- Broken links or an entire broken website on some pages.
- Older clips are nearly unwatchable. |
| Bottom Line: |
I agree with rearadmiral on a number of his points. Overall it's not a bad site, especially if you enjoy older men with younger women, although that's not exclusively the setup for all the scenes. Unfortunately there's quite a bit to not like about the site, too. For me only a few standout scenes and actresses made up for the technical issues to take it out of the 60s when I scored it.
Laura often does the filming and is very involved (hands, sometimes more), and her site is set up similarly with her bringing home men and women.
Mix of pro and unknown actresses, although some of the actresses seem to simply be prostitutes (that was the premise at one time IIRC, but that was long before I joined). Many scenes are simply okay, but there are a few that are outstanding. Ava Delush's clips as well as a more recent shoulder-length blonde's scenes come to mind.
There were wardrobe changes, often with the same girl trying out a couple of outfits, with prostitutes, airline stewardesses, and ballerinas in the mix.
It's not a huge site, but there's a decent amount of material.
Video quality is good for the newer half (approximately) of clips, but there are no scene distinctions or actresses in the file names of the downloaded clips, so you'll be frustrated searching through the clips you downloaded to find that particular one you're looking for in order to rename it.
Streaming and download options (540, 720, and 1080p) as well as zipped photo files (one size).
Bottom line- It's not horrible and probably worth joining at least once if you have any interest in the niche or models.
Would I join again? Probably, but a year or two would have to pass for the updates to pile up before I did. |
|
04-20-16 09:49am
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of attractive older women, just like the name implies
- A very old site, with content dating back more than a decade
- Photos and videos often available
- The site administrator is active on PU
- Other sites available on network with subscription |
| Cons: |
- Extremely strict download limits
- A very old site that, if you look at realistically, mostly has old content
- Videos older than a couple of years look pretty bad
- Most videos are fairly uninspired
- Probably exclusive, but you might wonder "Is this ATK? Have I seen these shoots on ATK?" at some point. Same photographer(s) apparently. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm reviewing each Karups site since they're apparently still treated as individual sites even though they've all recently become part of a network. That's a good thing, since "buy one, get two free" is a pretty uncommon occurrence, but also because many of the models were apparently listed on more than one Karups site. If you wanted all of (arbitrary name) "Cathy 2" photos and videos, you would've needed to join at least two sites. Now you can get all of "Cathy 2"s stuff with the same network membership, which is a good thing.
Karups Older Women is, shockingly, an adult site focusing on older women. There are some really attractive ladies, too, along with mediocre and a few unattractive ones. But different strokes for different folks, and there is something for almost everyone here so long as they like more mature and fairly homogeneous (racially) women.
There is content going back to 2006. As you would suspect, most of the older photography content looks fairly dated, but that's fine. It's available, and that's the most important part.
There is often video content, too, but it can be mostly summed up as "don't bother." Most is uninspired and not filmed at a high professional level. The older stuff looks worse than tube videos, but that can be forgiven since it's old stuff.
The biggest "con" is the strict download limits. Not gigabytes, mind you, but time. As was posted by the webmaster on the karups.com "user comments" section, quote:
"Standard, you are correct that there are absolutely NO download limits and the links do indeed expire. They expire 10 minutes after a page is opened/accessed, which is a reasonable solution to protect our content from non-members getting access to it. ... We understand that members want to access our content as easily and with as minimal restrictions as possible. We do our best to accommodate that desire while still offering our sites some protection against the infinite amount of surfers/members that share links, share passwords, etc... etc..."
What that means is you can download all you want, but you have to do it in ten minute windows. Try to start the download eleven minutes after visiting the page and the download link will not be active any longer.
The other big "con" is that total connections seem to be very limited. Want to download a couple of things in a ten minute window and continue to browse the site while you're doing it? Tough. I had two videos downloading simultaneously, using four segments each, and the site slowed to a crawl. Clicking on a model's scene took me to the page, but the thumbnail images wouldn't load. Reducing the segments to 3 per download didn't help. The thumbnails still showed the blank squares where they should be, but no images were inside. The "loading" indicator for the page was still spinning, though, so it's definitely trying. After a couple of minutes I reduced the segments to two per download and waited. Nothing. I finally reduced it to one segment per download and, after nothing happened on the original page that still shows "loading" per the indicator, I opened a new shoot from the same model.
And the same thing happened with only one segment being used for each of the two downloads. The link opened the page, but the thumbnails never loaded.
The connection was fine and the two downloads were saturating my ISP's download speeds, but nothing would happen on Karup's side while the two downloads were running.
You could open a new model's page and it would pull up her available shoots, but trying to open any of THOSE shoots yielded the same result. Empty boxes of thumbnails while the "loading" indicator spun indefinitely.
Then, interestingly, the first of the two 300MB+ downloads began slowing to a crawl, eventually trickling down to zero and failing. On the bright side, guess what finally loaded after the site dumped one of my two one-segment connections so that I couldn't finish the first download? Yep. The thumbnails finally loaded. So I queue up their zip files and start them downloading. And then, not too long after that, the second video download failed.
Bottom line: Would I recommend? If you want the content, yes, very much. As I said before and will keep saying, paying the subscription fee, constantly babysitting for ten minute intervals, and repeatedly dealing with the irritation and frustration of the site is the only way to legally acquire the pictures and videos, right? |
|
05-22-18 08:04am
Replies (1)
|
Review
41
|
Karup's PC
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- No ads behind paywall automatically adds five points to total score
- Loads of photos and video available
- Usually two or more sizes available for photos and videos
- Newer video content in HD
- Material is probably exclusive
- Recently began offering three Karups sites for one membership price
- Webmaster is active on PU |
| Cons: |
- Worst download limits I've ever encountered
- Strange photo zip sizes
- Majority of videos are uninspired |
| Bottom Line: |
The good? Lots of content, with sets going back over a decade. Tons of different models. They offer videos, and are filming newer stuff in HD. They've also made changes so that you now get access to three Karups sites with your $30 subscription purchase.
I think the material is probably exclusive, but Karups' content looks the same as ATK's. I'm guessing they use the same studio and photographer, but the same model's photos on each site tend to look exactly alike except for the poses.
Refreshingly, there are no ads once inside.
The bad?
There is no download VOLUME limit, but there are strict download TIME limits. Per the webmaster in the Karups comment section, the links time out after 10 minutes.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=104665
Quote:
"Standard, you are correct that there are absolutely NO download limits and the links do indeed expire. They expire 10 minutes after a page is opened/accessed, which is a reasonable solution to protect our content from non-members getting access to it. ... We understand that members want to access our content as easily and with as minimal restrictions as possible. We do our best to accommodate that desire while still offering our sites some protection against the infinite amount of surfers/members that share links, share passwords, etc... etc..."
And that's very much how it works.
If you want all of an actress' 15 sets and you open the 15 separate pages and click the 15 separate download links, all of the 15 downloads need to start in the ten minutes that the pages were opened. It was also my experience that the downloads were much more likely to finish and not be abruptly disconnected midway the closer they are to the beginning of that ten minute window.
Needless to say, expect a lot of lot of 403 errors where the links are no longer alive. By a lot I mean constant.
"Oh," you think, "I've got a 100Mbps connection, so that's not a big deal." But ten minutes is about the time it takes to download one (1) 7GB 4K movie, isn't it? More relevant is to consider how many hours you're at work, asleep, and doing other things. Take the two or three hours that are left. Unless you want to babysit and check in every ten minutes to make sure your downloads are still downloading, you're not going to be downloading much content from this site after you've paid your subscription fee, and it's by design.
That's the biggie. Little stuff?
Some of the solo videos are okay, but most of the boy/girl and lesbian material is boring, poorly shot, and/or boring and poorly shot. Worse is that many of the fairly recent video clips have substantial interlacing / combing artifacts with movement, and it sometimes occurs even with stationary subjects during slow movement of the camera.
(You've probably all seen the artifacts in videos, but here's an exaggerated example of interlacing problems in an unrelated screenshot: https://imgur.com/a/99cxhw8 )
There will also be weird photo zip sizes where the 1024 option is (arbitrary) 60mb and the 1500 option is 67mb. Or the worse resolution offered in a larger size download. Many of the newer photo downloads will be offered in large and extra large, so you may have the option of a 150mb+ set or a 300mb+ set. That's nice except for the strict download timeouts.
Occasionally you'll find missing download links for photo sets. Not frequently, but often enough to notice.
The older videos are occasionally watchable, but that's forgivable since the site has content going back a decade or more. The newest videos are offered in everything from amazingly oversized 360p clips (500mb+) to 1GB 480p, to nearly 2GB 720p, 3GB 1080p, and 7GB 4K offerings. Needless to say, you're not downloading more than a couple of those at a time. On the bright side, it won't bother you too much because most of the videos are only occasionally interesting unless you like the specific actress and just have to have it for a collection.
Would I recommend? Very much. After all, paying the subscription fee, constantly babysitting, and repeatedly dealing with the irritation and frustration of the strict ten minute download time limit is the only way to legally acquire the content. |
|
05-01-18 08:02am
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
Kink.com
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Huge. Even if you don't care about half the network, there's still tons of content.
- Good quality video
- Some storylines here and there.
- Big name and unknown models
- No constant logouts and re-login demands. Thanks, webmasters. Unfortunately, it makes the download limits much more obvious. |
| Cons: |
- Strict download limits. Maybe not technically, but very much a thing.
- Lots and lots of wrestling. That may be pro to some.
- Pretty specific niches that aren't going to appeal to most.
- Lots of tattoos. It fits with the theme, I guess, but it's unusual to find models without them. |
| Bottom Line: |
You've probably heard of Kink, even if it's just as a mental note to avoid. It's an enormous site. Like I said in the pros section, even if you don't have any interest whatsoever about half (or maybe even three quarters) of the content, there will still be tons of stuff for you to investigate.
The pros are pretty obvious. It's one of those binary sites that people are either going to say "yes, I'm going to join that eventually" or "nope, get me outta here." With that in mind I'm going to deal mostly with the drawbacks.
I was surprised to find lots and lots of rasslin. That might be a big draw to some, and if so then join right now, but it's a safe bet that if you find an actress you like, half or so of her scenes will be wrestling. That's fine if you're into it, but it begins to feel like filler after a while.
Tattoos seem almost tame here, but you'll see lots and lots of tattoos. Matraisse Madeline, a lovely dominatrix who has a great deal of work here, has them on her biceps now, which I personally think detracts from her very, very classic beauty. Oh well. That's fashion these days. Whatever floats your boats.
There are thumbnails that will be under an actress' page that you'll click and realize you can't access without paying more money at another site. Please stop this nonsense, webmasters. When customers who paid to view content at this site need to pay somewhere else to view content that is presented as available, those customers aren't excited and happy to learn that the thumbnail they just clicked will cost more money. If you insist on bothering members with ads behind the paywall, put the ads in a separate section that requires additional clicks. Don't pretend something is available to your paid subscribers when it's not.
There are traditional (not sneaky) ads in the site after you've logged in and are browsing, too.
And now the main reason for the below-average score.
The site is huge. Did I mention that already? Enormous. Years of content. And you won't be allowed to download jack. Sure, you can get a few movies here and there, but the download links time out very, very quickly. You'll get 403 errors on the next links in your queue after downloading something as small as a 250MB video.
I get the feeling they want to make it a streaming site. Eventually it gets to the point where you just give up. It DEFINITELY gets to the point where you aren't going to renew the expensive subscription for another month.
Webmasters, paying customers want to pay you for your product and to encourage you to make more of your product. Yes, I know there are pirates out there who don't want to pay for your stuff, and I'm guessing your approach is an attempt to limit that, but I'd suggest focusing more on people who want to, and will, give you money, because we'll just quit paying after we discover the inconveniences placed only on people who want to give you money. And then we'll forget about ever rejoining your site again.
Worse, we'll tell other paying customers how bad the experience was, and other paying customers will reconsider giving you their money, too.
Bottom line: Lots of content, but unless you're into streaming it's too much of a PITA. |
|
08-28-17 07:53pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
43
|
Lane Sisters
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Majority of clips are available in HD
- Photos available for some sets
- Download managers work
- Twins. Interesting fetish material, but nothing THAT kinky, you perv. |
| Cons: |
- No longer updating
- Comical "we could not find this photoset" errors when you go to view some photos.
- Like most openlife offerings, they pad their site with BTS/Interview filler clips. |
| Bottom Line: |
The good: There are over 100 video clips. There are lots of behind the scenes/interview videos, but there are also a lot of boy girl and girl girl clips, as well as masturbation.
The Lane sisters are attractive young ladies, although you'll need an interest in attractive young tattooed ladies to spend too much time with them these days. BUT, I suppose one advantage (?) to no longer updating your site is that all of the photos and videos apparently took place before whichever sister got the sleeve of tattoos done.
This is apparently one of the rare Open Life Network sites that offers most, if not all, of the content in high definition. I didn't click every video, but I grabbed samples sorted by date through the entire site and it appears that the majority are offered in HD.
There are some irritations. It *IS* an openlife site, after all, and what did you expect? The most obvious is having behind the scenes clips for the shoots that aren't offered on the site. And it's extremely obvious when it's the most recent video. Yep. The very first video when arranged by date is an outtake from a clip you can't view.
Pause to think about that for a moment.
The most recent video is a behind the scenes clip from a video that isn't offered anywhere on the site. And the site is no longer updating, so it's probably been sitting there as the most recent clip for two or three years.
The site is often broken. When clicking on a random photo set to check the quality and zip availability, I was led to a page that said the photoset couldn't be found. Good luck if that's the material you're interested in.
There aren't really that many videos. If you're on a fast connection I'd be surprised if it took you more than a couple of days to grab everything you wanted, even in HD.
Bottom line: If you're a HUGE Lane Sisters fan, and if you can get past the broken website, and if you can not be bothered by a complete lack of updates, and if you can keep your expectations in check, and if you find it for $5 or so for a month, it might be worth joining. |
|
12-12-17 08:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
44
|
Love Hairy
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Low price for specialized interests
- High quality images of beautiful women
- Download managers work |
| Cons: |
- Ads inside the paywall. Not so much ads, but camgirl stuff. Which are still ads.
Nitpicking:
- Overall size of the website?
- Not every single image set is enormous with amazing resolution? |
| Bottom Line: |
Love Hairy is a sort of “best of” compilation site of Metart, Errotica, and other sites under the Metart umbrella that give collectors with specialized interests access to their particular flavor of beautiful women. And it’s great.
The site offers pages and pages of beautiful young women who are groomed but not shaven. I didn’t see any scary legs or bizarre hairy nipples. I only saw one or two models that would probably be considered “dyke”-ish. The majority of the models, and sets, are of women who just happen to look like actual grown women down there.
There aren’t many with underarm hair or stubble, but every so often you’ll happen upon one. Interestingly, the women are often so attractive that it’s not all that disturbing even if you don’t generally care for that sort of thing. Seriously, click through and find one and ask yourself if you’d shun her advances, refuse to sleep with her, or consider it a deal breaker in real life in any meaningful way.
Most sets offer multiple sizes of .zip files to download, with some of the more recent sets’ largest option being absolutely huge. There are occasional videos as well, but the photos are where the site really shines.
The online viewing of photos isn't my favorite, but I guess old-fashioned pages full of fast loading thumbnails you click to go to another page where the image can be viewed is, well, old-fashioned. Still, I would much rather have the option of choosing it over a site with thumbnails that you click and some sort of script puts the image in front of the open page of thumbnails until you close it. I know that's the direction everything has gone recently, but I don't care much about an "experience" when looking at nekkid pictures. The means of viewing them should be intuitive, fast, transparent, and un-annoying, and the modern flash/java/whatever approach often isn't.
My other gripe is the cam girl advertisements. They're at a point on the screen where you'll often drag your pointer across them and THEY'LL pop out to cover the content you actually want to see. A minor gripe but still one that should be mentioned.
Regardless, it's well worth the $8 if you have any interest in photos of beautiful women who don’t shave everything completely bald.
WEBMASTER:
May I suggest some similar sites for tanlines? How about freckles and redheads? I bet the tanlines one would be a decent draw, and I would suspect you have a thousand or more sets that would apply when you think that even the slightest bikini line would equal content. I’d definitely pay my $8 for it. Heck, I’d pay $10 for it. :) |
|
03-03-19 11:18am
Replies (2)
|
Review
45
|
MetArt
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- The obvious: Beautiful models.
- Easy to navigate, easy to use.
- No download limits that I encountered.
- A surprising number of models with very natural tan lines. I'm going to type it again just because they're so attractive and I'm surprised no one has started a niche site based on them. Tan lines.
- Not the same setting for every model. FWIW, I didn't recognize any repeats.
- Very few, if any at all, fake breasts.
- Did I mention tan lines? |
| Cons: |
- Aliases for some well-known stars.
- User tags not as complete as they could be.
- Pretty limited in age, color, and body type.
- Naming is a bit odd. Lots of single letters after first names to differentiate from models. Made up example: Lori B., Lori G., Lori H., and Lori L. Not a big deal, but noticeably unusual. |
| Bottom Line: |
For perspective, my average site rating is 77 and the best score I've ever given is a 91.
I decided to finally see what all the fuss is about, and I'll be damned if the site didn't live up to its reputation.
Know what you're getting into. It's not hardcore. It is gorgeous women photographed well by people who know what they are doing.
This is the first time I think I've really experienced a hydra. A very, very pleasant hydra, but a hydra still. You can click to look at a model's set, and either the "previous set" or "next set" thumbnail will show a different model's scene that you're going to click on to look at, too. And then it will happen again with that set and another model. And again. And again. And again.
Most websites find you browsing through multiple scenes to see the ones you DO to view. This one is the opposite. You'll realize that you are having trouble finding sets you DON'T want to see. Word of warning: If you join, you won't just be a member one single time. It might not be month-to-month, but you'll probably be joining this site again.
Beautiful models. Not "hey, those are beautiful models for an adult site," but beautiful in the women-in-general sense. I prefer older women, but there's no denying that almost every single model would turn heads in any room she entered, and more than likely be the prettiest one there. Even the models you decide to skip over are attractive, and if the skipped-over one were to approach you at the beach or grocery store (much less a bar) and began chatting with you and showing even the slightest bit of interest, then you'd do your best to see her again. And she's one you'll skip over on the site.
Every shoot I saw had small (10-ish mb), medium (50mb or so), and large (80-500mb) zip files, and the images can also be viewed on-screen with a choice between small, medium, and large as well.
Did I mention tan lines yet? It's indicative of why the site is so good. It's not simply tan lines, but all-over tans, pale skin, hairy pubic areas, completely shaved, etc. It's so great to see different women look like different women.
Everything isn't perfect, though. Letting users add the tags is a pretty inefficient system. While "sexy", "gorgeous", "pretty face", and "perfect 10" are nice, they're very subjective and not extremely useful. Very basic tags from the photographer/webmaster like curly hair, brunette, lingerie, etc. would be appreciated since the tags can be clicked on to pull up any other set that has the same tag.
There is very little ethnic variety, and is 95%+ beautiful white women. That's not a big deal for me, but if you prefer women that are more towards the darker side of the spectrum be aware that you're not going to find too much variation here.
You'll recognize a few stars here and there (the lovely Lorena Garcia comes to mind, and I was very glad to see her), but for the most part it's unknown amateurs.
I didn't download or otherwise investigate the videos at all so someone else will need to give input on that, but I have no reason to suspect they're anything other than superb.
Bottom line:
A great site. If you have any appreciation for the female form, join. Will I join again? Definitely.
Webmaster: Do you run (or does anyone else know of) a MILF website with similar photography? Anilos is great and I've been a repeat member off and on for years, but there's a definite difference in styles and I'd really like to see some older women handled with Met Art's artistic approach. |
|
08-13-16 09:17am
Replies (0)
|
Review
46
|
My Dad's Hot Girlfriend
(0)
51.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Attractive women in nice clothes doing naughty things
- Big names, high production values
- Apparently very easy to cancel when you realize what they did to you |
| Cons: |
- The only one that matters: You aren't really subscribing to the site
- No more network access = tremendous reduction in value
- Downloads often wouldn't complete
- Downloads time out |
| Bottom Line: |
AVOID AVOID AVOID
Here we are again for this week's warning to anyone who might be surfing the internet looking for reviews or discounts and happen to click upon pornusers with some interest in this Naughty America site. DON'T DO IT. I can't stress this enough. Don't join this site right now because it's not what you think it is. Avoid any Naughty America site right now because they are in the middle of, well, I don't know what they're in the middle of. F*cking up their subscription model to the point where long-time users are cancelling their memberships? Yeah, that'll work. Let's say that.
Yes this is a full stand-alone site now. Yes there are promises of those good looking women doing exactly what you expect. Yes they are filmed well. Yes there appears to be a substantial amount of material. Yes the recent stuff is presented in high definition. All that is technically true.
BUT:
Naughty America has implemented a new scheme whereby you "join" a site in order to be allowed to upgrade to get the content of the site. Does that make sense? I'll try to re-phrase it using a different consumer product in case it's unclear. Let's see... Okay. Here's one: You go to McDonalds. An employee meets you at the door to take your order. You order the McWhatever Value Meal and give them your money. The McDonalds employee takes your money, thanks you for your purchase, and lets you inside. Once inside you walk to the counter and are immediately given yesterday's chicken nugget, two french fries from last week, a cup of mostly melted ice, and an expired pack of mustard. You explain to the cashier that you already ordered and paid for the McWhatever Value Meal, and the cashier smiles and tells you no, you paid the door charge to come in and order the McWhatever Value Meal, please enjoy sampling some other items on the menu, and now would you like to order the McWhatever Value Meal for another similar charge to the one you already paid at the door?
Don't do it. I know it's tempting. I know the network used to be great, but it's not that place anymore. Go read the forums and see for yourself. Saturday 9-15-18, quote:
" I paid $4.95 for a trial only to find out I could only access 8 VR videos. I decided to upgrade to a FULL account and paid $71.40 and now I can't access ANYTHING! EVERYTHING IS LOCKED! Even the videos I had access to during the trial."
AVOID AVOID AVOID |
|
09-18-18 02:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
47
|
My First Sex Teacher
(0)
52.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Multiple download formats
- Good looking women in professional clothing
- High production values |
| Cons: |
- Most of the current download sizes are too large for the quality
- Downloads fail a lot.
- Lots of fake tits and goofy looking lip-injected mouths
- The elephant in the room: You get access to this month's videos with your membership fee
- Oh, and the site isn't part of the larger network anymore. |
| Bottom Line: |
NO LONGER A CLONE SITE
Now a glorious stand alone site that offers all of this month's videos! Hooray! Wait, this month's videos? That can't be right. Why in the world would I pay $20 for eight videos?
We'll get back to that in a moment.
If you are looking for a site that caters to your imagining that there is a well kept, nicely groomed, nicely dressed, gorgeous nymphomaniac MILF teacher out there just waiting to take advantage of you, then this WAS the site for you. It's not anymore, unfortunately. Yes the videos are - technically - all there, but you can't have them. You just signed up for access to pay another fee to access the videos that are older than one month. Do you follow?
Put another way, Naughty America now expects users to pay an initial fee to get into their site in order to pay *another* fee to access the content. What used to cost users $20 for complete access to the entire network now costs over $1000 to replicate.
Go read their forums. They're open to the public. The funniest suggestion I've seen is that Naughty America is actively engaged in helping users quit their porn habit.
There are hundreds of videos here, but you can't access them with your membership fee. You can only get the first month's, which, as of 8-2-18, appears to be eight videos. In fairness, you also get other Naughty America sites' videos for that month, so you might have access to 50-70 or so total videos. But I'm assuming you were interested in the ones you thought you were actually paying for on the site you signed up to view.
That? Yeah, that's still eight videos.
Avoid. Don't get tricked by this deceptive approach, and don't encourage this business model with your dollars. |
|
08-02-18 02:33am
Replies (2)
|
Review
48
|
My Friend's Hot Mom
(0)
52.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Gorgeous MILFs filmed well
- Lots of videos available for download (ha, fooled you!)
- Multiple download options
- 4K resolution |
| Cons: |
- About those videos available for download...
- Downloads fail often
- Downloads not only fail while you're downloading, but the links time out often. Don't expect to use download managers to any effect here.
- Lots of fake breasts.
- Tons of ads. |
| Bottom Line: |
MOST IMPORTANT: NO LONGER CLONE SITE, AND NO LONGER A NETWORK
If gorgeous MILFs in formulaic action that is filmed competently using good clothing, lighting, and sets is appealing to you, then this is definitely a site that would've been worth pursuing before Naughty America decided to make their bizarre changes to their subscription model. Sorry you missed it. On the bright side, you get to potentially watch the collapse of one of the biggest adult networks in real time.
Myfriendshotmom.com is longer a clone site but now a full-on independent site requiring its own subscription. Not only that, it requires it's own subscription PLUS additional "channel" subscriptions if you want any content ***from the site you just paid to f*cking join*** that is beyond a month old. Seriously. The first subscription just buys you access to be able to buy the rest of the stuff.
Here is the disclosure at the signup page. Quote: "Become a member for this month's new releases."
Did you catch it? Yep. That's their new terms.
So let's see, it looks like... Nine videos. If you join today, July 17th, you'll have access to all the videos from the last month. Nine videos. There are 154 pages of videos listed, and assuming six videos per page, it looks like the site has well over 1000 videos with the oldest going back to 2004.
But your subscription will allow you access to nine of them and whatever other videos were released that month on the rest of the network. So expect 50-100 videos to be available to you, tops. And most of those are going to be on sites other than the one you joined. If you want more than that (also known as "an actual subscription to the site you subscribed to") you'll have to buy another subscription because, and I cannot stress this enough, the first subscription was just the entry fee to allow you to pay the second entry fee for the site you thought you were subscribing to the first time. Here's one of the statements on their new pricing policy. Notice especially the next to the last paragraph:
https://tour.naughtyamerica.com/media/you-have-questions-weve-got-answers-1576
I cannot warn you away from this site/network enough. What used to cost $20 or so a month is now $1K+ for the same content. Go read the Naughty America forum before you spend any money. It's open to the public.
AVOID |
|
07-17-18 02:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
49
|
My Naughty Latin Maid
(0)
52.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
RIPOFF ALERT - BUYER BEWARE
- No longer a clone site
- Good production values for over a decade ago
- Some big name actresses of ten plus years ago |
| Cons: |
RIPOFF ALERT - BUYER BEWARE
- Most recent update was 2007
- No longer a clone site, so no more access to the rest of the network
- Video quality is worse than tube sites. Remember, the videos are over ten years old
- You may get to pay your $18 and have no access to the videos |
| Bottom Line: |
If the idea of an average to somewhat attractive to occasionally hot Hispanic woman coming into your apartment to do some light vacuuming before suddenly deciding to have sex with you is your idea of an exciting fantasy, this might be the place for you. Well, if you are also into dead sites that are no longer updating and that also have video quality that, while probably good for the time, look worse than tube sites these days. Oh, and with no network access to anything else. BUT, if all of that is what you're looking for, this is a site you may want to investigate.
Well, except for the part where Naughty America has changed their subscription policy to some sort of "channel" nonsense and now you only get access to new releases from the month you joined and anything else you have to pay extra for.
Quote:
"To all customers that purchased a membership after April 2nd,All content released in the month of April is now available with your membership.On May 1st, two actions will take place with this new membership cycle: April's new releases will gradually move into the vault and remain available for separate purchase.
May's new releases will become available to all memberships, releasing on a daily basis"
So you could ostensibly purchase a membership for My Naughty Latin Maid and have no access to any videos from My Naughty Latin Maid without paying extra for the videos that weren't released this month. In other words, all of them.
Good luck!
Bottom line?
RIPOFF ALERT - AVOID ALL NAUGHTY AMERICA SITES |
|
07-02-18 04:59am
Replies (2)
|
Review
50
|
My Sister's Hot Friend
(0)
51.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Good looking women doing naughty things
- 700+ videos. Ha. Just kidding.
- Newer videos you can't access with your subscription are in HD |
| Cons: |
These minor ones seem almost quaint:
- Ads inside the paywall
- Downloads don't complete
Compared to the biggie:
- Did I mention you don't get access to the site once you pay your subscription? |
| Bottom Line: |
Holy crap. The (cough) subscription (cough) model at Naughty America seems to have somehow gotten even worse. I never would've thought that possible, but click and see for yourself.
https://www.naughtyamerica.com/naughty-a...bership-with-variety
PORNUSERS STAFF - Please don't stop doing business with them because I'm guessing that would remove the ability for consumers to discuss/review and try to make other consumers aware of the subscription changes.
No longer a clone site. It's independent now, which means you don't get the full Naughty America network with your subscription fee anymore. For that matter, up until a few days ago you didn't even get the site you thought you joined. You paid your subscription fee and you got access to any videos released over the last one month period (on the site you'd joined, remember).
For My Sister's Hot Friend that would've been two videos. You'd pay your twenty dollars and be able to view two clips. If you wanted to see more than that then Naughty America expects you to pay an additional fee for access to the videos that are over a month old.
Crazy, huh?
Wait, did someone say something? Oh, hey Naughty America. No, we're just hanging out discussing your subscription changes where you only got the last month's videos on the site you joined.
"Hold my beer." - Naughty America
Not content to allow their subscription plans to stagnate and become outdated, now the terms on their signup page say "Updated daily with exclusive videos from our library." And people are posting in the forums and on reddit that yep, that's what it means. Join the individual site and you'll apparently get some unrelated clips from the last year.
One has to assume you'll be able to pay more to get access to the site you thought you were joining in the first place via the "channel" option. Per Naughty America:
"If you would like more content than what is released in your membership, all updates in our library will be available for purchase. "
So you will now also be able to buy access to even the recent updates on the site you thought you were subscribing to.
https://forums.naughtyamerica.com/topic/34449-cant-download-a-video-that-was-posted-2-days-ago/
Good luck!
No, seriously, avoid, avoid, avoid.
AVOID |
|
08-28-18 02:43am
Replies (2)
|
|
