Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : standard (0)

Feedback:   All (114)  |   Reviews (74)  |   Comments (10)  |   Replies (30) Other:   Replies Received (69)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 51-75 of 75 Page : Page 1 2 3    < Previous Page Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 51 My XXX Pass (0) 88.0 Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review. Pros: - Large "network", lots of content, and good variety - Big name actresses and up and comers - Multiple video encoding options - HD videos - Good PU discount - Very large site - Good site if you're a fan of blowjobs and POV Cons: - Weird/huge encoding options on numerous videos (Immoral Live is the worst) - Now that I think about it, Immoral Live is the letdown overall - Definite pornstar site. Lots of fake tits, tattoos, etc. - "Network" could just as easily be offered as one large site. Bottom Line: Mommy Blows Best and 1000 Blowjobs were the better sites on the network for my dollars. Only Teen Blowjobs is pretty good if you prefer college aged girls, and throated is for all of you who enjoy drooling, running-mascara, fake-eyelashes-stuck-to-cheek BJs. Sunlust was good if fairly by-the-numbers XXX, as were the remaining sites other than Immoral Live. Immoral Live held the least appeal of the bunch to me. Imagine pornstars hired to X with no premise beyond achieving X while being filmed with prosumer home-video filming. Hey, there's Penelope Pornstar! We hired her to (spin the wheel) give a blowjob! Hey, there's Penelope now giving the blowjob, and she does while looking bored through the entire passionless too-huge video. The encoding for the sites were pretty good, and the scenes were appropriately sized for the HD and non-HD choices. Except, again, for Immoral Live. There were often scenes that would be 1GB downloads on any other site on the same network that were 4 to 6 gigabyte downloads on Immoral Live, and they didn't look any better. Bottom line: Large site with good oral content and only a few irritations here and there, and definitely worth a look at the PU rate if you're a fan of oral. Would I join again? Yes. 07-03-16  05:33am Replies (0) Review 52 Naughty Alysha (0) 63.0 Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review. Pros: - Fills a niche - HD content is available in the more recent updates (720 or 1080 IIRC) - Exclusive material - Early stuff has decent energy. - Um... Was easy to join and cancel? - Let's see... Still updating every so often? Cons: - A listed download limit of 50GB/day, but it can and will apparently be lowered if you do unknown things that aren't mentioned in the terms. Good luck! - Download managers aren't allowed. - Not many updates - It appears to have become a (lucrative, and good for her) job, and that has taken some of the energy and excitement away. It's not too hard for the different scenes to become similar, repetitious, and boring - The same scene will be separated in order to pretend the single video is multiple updates because it was cut in half (or thirds). Bottom Line: Naughty Alysha: The Naughty Alysha site is focused mostly on an attractive middle aged woman who enjoys large toys, fisting, anal, going to adult video stores to have sex with lots of men, etc. There are some gloryhole scenes as well as gangbangs, and there will often be footage of the semen-covered departure out into the parking lot. There are some good scenes, but I found the early ones to be the best because it didn't seem to be approached as a job. 2010 and before, when her hair was shoulder length and occasionally curly, were the best clips for energy but, of course, the worse clips for quality and crisp resolution. There aren't a lot of updates. Looking at the site, here are the most recent updates: Added 07/03/2017 (toys) Added 06/20/2017 (toys) Added 06/05/2017 (toys) Added 05/17/2017 (MF) Added 05/05/2017 (toys?) Added 04/25/2017 (MF, 2nd half?) Added 04/06/2017 (MF, 1st half?) Added 03/17/2017 (gangbang) You get the idea. Two a month or so if you count the halves as separate. The more recent clips are available in HD if you're interested in feeling out the download limits and potential 24 hour bans. Alysha and Jenny Jizz are the most active sites on the affiliated network, and the two often team up in clips. As is the case with all sites on the network, there is a 50GB or less download limit each day, and download managers aren't allowed. The bad is covered in the overall network review. I gave a few points for exclusivity and the good older stuff even with all of the limitations and stagnant site, so that's where the 63 came from. Speaking of the network... Pornicate: Pornicate as a network is, as I mentioned, seeming to only update Naughty Alysha and Jenny Jizz stuff recently. Jenny Jizz seems to be the most active, and Jenny does essentially all the same stuff that Alysha does. Roxy Raye and her butt-stuff is in the network, and there are some other minor players as well. The sites' content offerings are hit are miss. There may be some videos without photos, or there may be photos without videos, or there may just be a few photos for you to look at online and with no download options for anything. Worse, some of the choices would appear to just be poorly lit, posed, or captured shots that the photographer was going to delete before the webmaster or actress said, "Wait! Don't throw those in the trash! I can put them on my site!" Some strange and surprising older clips/pics are used as filler for the network. A Nella photo set popped up (late '90s?). Another, and I don't remember who it was, I remember seeing was a photo set of a now well-known porn star when she was just starting out. Young, gorgeous, and with her natural breasts. There was no other content including her and it had nothing to do with anything else. It was just some old content that had been purchased and put on the site. The elephant in the room? The download limit. In mid-2017 it's listed as 50GB/day. The FCC classifies broadband internet access as 25Mbps. If you don't have that, your connection is the modern equivalent of dial-up back around the year 2000. 25Mbps can download 50GB of 1GB+ HD clips in four hours. So, if you have broadband access, you can potentially use the site for four hours each day. If you have 100Mbps service you can use the site for less than an hour. I understand concerns about content theft --- and, if we're honest, trying to milk another month or two out of customers--- but making a site so inconvenient to use that legitimate, paying customers give up and will never consider returning may not be the best approach, either. mbaya has a review on the Roxy Raye page if you care to read another opinion of the network. Bottom line: 56 or so if I had a place to score it. Avoid. 07-24-17  10:53am Replies (1) Review 53 Naughty America (0) 52.0 Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review. Updated: 06-18-18  04:15am  (Update History) Reason: Major subscription policy and cost changes Pros: WARNING SEE BELOW - Huge site with years of content - Frequent updates - Easy signup/cancellation - Big HD and 4K videos available - Lots of old videos are being updated to modern resolutions - VR. Quite a bit of VR, too. - "On the go" clips are five minute best-of edits of the scene. Pretty good idea. Cons: WARNING SEE BELOW - Ads, ads, and more ads. - Pretty vanilla. Even though the models are gorgeous, it still becomes repetitive. - Anything above the smallest "mobile" and "on the go" scenes are pretty large. - Download managers work briefly, but links time out. Which brings us to: - If you're on anything under 25Mbps you're going to be stuck with the smallest download options unless you want to babysit the downloads. - Very much a pornstar site. Fake tits and tattoos abound. - Requires frequent logins after irritating frequent logouts. - Did I mention the ads? Bottom Line: WARNING Edit 6-18-18 This has become one of the worst sites I'm aware of. They've switched to some sort of bizarre "channel" subscription so that your membership fee gives you a few new videos from that month, but otherwise only allows you access to buy other channels. Here's where the trick is. Go to the "join" page and see where they say "Become a member for this month's new releases." That's what they mean, too. You get this months new releases. Anything else and you pay extra. Imagine being charged double digits to get in a restaurant, being given a plate of breadsticks and one Sprite (no refills), and then being given a menu for everything else that all costs additional money. Their forum is open to the public. I recommend going to read about the debacle. It's a train wreck, and so bad that NA staff is arguing with members and daring them to cancel their subscriptions and comparing their subscription model to buying a base model Porsche and needing to pay extra for the options you want. One member pointed out that it would now cost over $1000/month to currently have access to all of the content that was $30/month just a short time ago. Buyer beware. DISREGARD EVERYTHING BELOW THIS LINE If you've been around the internet and adult sites for any amount of time you've seen, and probably joined, Naughty America at some point. It's a very good, very large site with lots of big name actresses doing routine adult stuff in (mostly) well-lit, well-filmed, well-financed scenes and settings. It's worth joining at least once even if you're just looking to complete a particular actress' collection or are interested in virtual reality scenes. There are a lot of ads. That's a bit of an understatement, really. There are ads everywhere. Beside the videos, beside the thumbnails, in the thumbnails as camoflauged "locked" links to other sister sites, etc. It's very excessive, and an automatic five points off of the score just for an unobtrusive presence. I should probably knock another five off for how blatant these are. Streaming and photos are available if that's your thing. The scenes, while formulaic, are very well done and often have the models in nice clothes and lingerie. The appeal isn't in groundbreaking new content but volume and predictability, which is fine. It's not a bad place to start a collection. UNLESS you've got slow internet service. If you're puttering along below 25Mbps, you're going to be getting the small files. Even the small-ish 480p scenes are getting up into 500MB+ range. The larger 720 and 1080 files will push 2-3GB+, and the 4K and VR scenes are probably over 6GB. Not a big deal if download managers worked, but they don't. Not for long. You'll get a few clips and then the links will die and you'll need to log in again. Why, webmasters? Is there not enough room at the table for paid customers? If I log back in, is it kicking another user off to make room for me again? Bottom line: Not bad. Good, even, especially considering that it's reasonably priced. Far from perfect, though, and know what to expect going in. Would I recommend? Probably. 08-19-17  12:04pm Replies (0) Review 54 Naughty America VR (0) 52.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - They'll allow you access to a few VR clips - Big name actresses - Good production values - They offer a few download options for different equipment Cons: - They'll allow you access to a few VR clips. See below. - The worst and most expensive network I'm aware of. - Downloads fail often. Bottom Line: Honestly, there's not really much to say about the videos. Big names, big production values, and quality offerings overall. You can look at the tour to see the stars and types of clips. If you've been around adult sites for any amount of time you know that Naughty America is, or was, one of the heavy hitters. Quality vanilla stuff that was on a big network for a decent price. But that was the old Naughty America, and all of what I'll warn you about affects Naughty America VR. How the mighty have fallen. There are well over 100 videos on this site (not network, just site). BUT, with the new and improved Naughty America approach you can only access the videos from the last month. They even say it on their signup page now in a sneaky disclosure: "Become a member for this month's new releases." And they mean it, too. You might think they mean to join so you can see the latest stuff and enjoy their huge backlog of content, but no, that's not what they mean. Not anymore. If you want to enjoy anything past "this months new releases" you'll need to pay. And while sites like "Naughty America VR" and "Seduced by a Cougar" and "Naughty Bookworms" used to be part of one umbrella and available with one subscription, now you'll need to pay for each individual site. And you'll pay a LOT. One user on the forums speculates that it would cost well over $1000 a month to have the same subscription that cost $5 or so per month earlier in the year. Another commented that he'd joined a site on the network and had access to something like two videos. Two. Add to that constant timeouts and failed downloads even with download managers, and there is almost no reason to risk joining anymore. Avoid. I can't stress that enough. The NA forums are open to the public. Go and read. EDIT: I forgot to mention that NA staff is openly challenging people to cancel their memberships in the forum. https://forums.naughtyamerica.com/topic/34349-membership-pricing/ NA? Now it stands for Never Again. 06-26-18  03:44am Replies (3) Review 55 Naughty Office (0) 52.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - Some really attractive women in nice clothes doing naughty things. - High production values. - Big name actresses and lesser-known talent. - 500+ videos. Ha, just kidding. You can have 8 plus the option to buy access to the older ones. Want the 500? Pay up, sucker. No, pay up AGAIN. Cons: - Seriously. It's July 22, and there are 8 clips you'll have access to if you "join" the site today. - Older videos are low quality, but they're old enough to accept the technical limitations. - Lots of fake tits. - No network access anymore. Bottom Line: No longer a clone site. No longer a network site, either. Now a glorious standalone and laughably expensive proposition like all the other NA sites. --- Do you like good looking women, often MILFs, that come across looking like the librarian you always hoped you'd find back when you were 20 years old but finally accepted that never really existed? Do you enjoy the idea of gorgeous older women in silk blouses and miniskirts, and beneath those fancy clothes even fancier lingerie and stockings? Well this was the site for you. I mean, I guess it still *could* be, but it's not worth joining anymore now that Naughty America has changed their subscription policy so that you don't get sh*t with your subscription anymore. You didn't think you were going to get access to the site just because you joined the site, did you? Ha. No, no. That's not how Naughty America sites work these days. These days you buy access to buy more access in order to try and get the content you thought you were going to have access to when you joined the site the first time. No, really. You buy access to the site, you get the videos from the last month, and you can buy ADDITIONAL access to videos older than a month. Your first expenditure was simply opening the door to the older videos. You know. The older videos on the site you thought you were buying a subscription for. On the bright side, you possibly get whatever other videos Naughty America released on their other sites for that month, too, so you could potentially get as many as 50-100 videos with your (initial) membership fee. If you want to continue it another month you'll get those new videos, too. Well, not really "too." You'll lose access to the ones you had for your first month. Good luck! Go read the Naughty America forums for insight into the debacle. They're open to the general public and you don't need to be a member to read the threads. Add to this links that timeout and downloads that often won't complete and there is no way this site can be recommmended anymore. Worse, it's no longer a network, so value-wise nothing related to Naughty America is worth joining now. Now it's over $1K/month to get what was available on the network just recently for only $20/month. AVOID 07-22-18  08:02pm Replies (0) Review 56 New Sensations Network (0) 88.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - Saturated my 6 Mbps DSL connection - Downthemall works - No download limit that I encountered. - Multiple encoding rates and formats, recent movies offer portable sizes up to 1080p - You can download clips from a DVD or the entire DVD. Nice. - Scenes include photo .zip files for downloading as well as screen captures. - Even the reasonably sized ipad/iphone .mp4 clips are decent quality on a larger computer screen. - It doesn't seem to log you out arbitrarily. Thank you, webmaster. - Lots of short haired actresses if that's something you're interested in (not a category or tag, just a function of having a lot of actresses in general). Cons: - Some photo zips are just low-res screen captures - Ads inside - Site didn't seem as responsive as it could've been, and I suspect it's because there is SO much going on in every page. It's a very, very visually-busy site. - Apparently a very traffic-busy site as well, because I ran into a few "connection reset - server is too busy" pages while the downloads from the site continued along fine. - When you click on the scene or link you want to visit, a HUGE full-page banner promoting the latest movie/actress/scene is at the top and you are forced to scroll down past it before you can see the content you were looking for. Very irritating, and so annoying I searched for browser add-ons to try to disable it. - Can't find a way to mark actresses as favorites. - Seems a bit silly, but there is no logout button that I could find. -Their older videos are watchable but poor quality by today's standards. - To be continued (nothing too bad, just a few more notes) Bottom Line: Cons continued: - The page layout can be very annoying. For example, if you click on updates, you get a scene/DVD/scene/DVD/scene/DVD layout, with the page and scenes/DVDs all sort of running together. - Big size gap between video quality/encoding options, and wacky encoding options/sizes. - Video download links expire after a day or so. BOTTOM LINE First and foremost, it's nice to not have to login and get past a captcha every hour or two after being logged out automatically. I don't think I was prompted to log in past the initial join date. Nicely done, NS. A large site with a lot of content and quite a few hidden gems. For example: I saw that they only had one (1) Nicole Aniston scene and I was disappointed. When I click on it I discover the one (1) Nicole Aniston scene is her with short hair and her natural breasts. Full disclosure- The site review might've started at 110% because of that. Seriously, though, there are a lot of actresses/scenes like that. If you've got some time it's worth digging through (even with the irritatations that will be addressed later) simply because they have a lot of stars I'd forgotten about or who are no longer active that you'll stumble across. The site is heavily focusing on the stepson/daughter/brother/sister/mom/dad angle. Not my thing, but it's all fake exactly like every other plumber or pizza delivery guy setup. The majority of the actresses are college aged, but there is a good MILF representation, too. Great mix of skin colors, hair length/style/color, etc. Looking for some short haired actresses? This is the place to visit. In a reverse of what I usually see, the video links are only good for about a day in your download manager while the photo .zip links seem to last indefinitely. That's probably a fairly reasonable approach on the business end to keep people subscribed, but on the collector-consumer end this is a huge site with lots of content that you're not going to get unless you want to take a lot of time each day setting up new links. GRIPES A lot of the "glamcore" style movies are way too dark. I think they're aiming for artistic, but it just ends up looking like porn without adequate lighting. Size/encoding- I don't get this at all. The newer movies are in HD, but the same clip in different resolutions will be named the same thing. EVERY .mp4 of a clip, from the mobile to the ipad to the 720 to the 1080, will be named "something_something_1920.mp4". BIG gripe: You think you can maximize content downloaded but still get really good quality by grabbing the 720p clips, but they are often the exact same size or nearly exactly the same size as the 1080p clips. I can't see any advantage to downloading the 720p offerings when they offer 1920, 1440, and 720. I'm guessing all the others are converted down from the 1920, but I don't understand why so many sizes are identical. Example: Ashley Jensen has a scene where the 720 and 1080 mp4s are nearly the same size (.84GB and .87GB respectively), and many of the full DVD offerings have 100% exactly the same size downloads for both 720 and 1080 offerings. I don't have a fast enough connection to test, but it makes me wonder if the resolution is exactly the same and only the screen size is manipulated when encoded. It's a HUGE site, although that's tempered a bit by the way they pad each actresses' scene stats. Clicking on an actress gives you her scene, followed immediately by the DVD the scene came from as a second option. It often ends up looking like a repeat of itself. A better approach would be to have the DVD mentioned with the scene (for example, a clickable link saying "From the DVD "Everybody Loves This DVD" that goes to that DVD), but not repeated directly underneath. For example: Choose Bobbi Starr. She's listed as having 35 scenes (woohoo!), but there are only 9 or 10 actual clips. The other 25 are the same clips in the full DVDs, the "party" version of the DVD (no xxx), bloopers, behind the scenes, etc. I didn't count off any points for that approach, but I view it as technically correct while still deceptive. Lots of lingerie and nicely done "wife" style scenes, but quite a few silly striped socks and backwards baseball caps to force the "hey look, that 25 year old clearly just graduated high school" type fantasy, too. I'm really surprised at how good this site is content-wise, but it's way too busy and not very pleasant to browse and view. ***It's the first paid site I've ever joined where I researched image blockers for Firefox to cut down on some of the clutter and get rid of the HUGE banner at the top that you have to scroll past every time*** The images are associated with the links to the videos, too, so it didn't work. Webmaster- See Mile High Media / Famedigital for a more intuitive and pleasant user experience. Bottom line- Get past the little annoyances and it's a large, good site with quality content. Would I join again? Yes. 06-11-16  11:49am Replies (0) Review 57 Nextdoor Models (0) 68.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Average to very attractive models. - Very few fake breasts, and the ones that are fake are nicely done and not cartoonish. - Mostly 20-35 year olds (guessing at ages). Very few teenie-bopper looking girls. - Zip files for photos, but only one choice. No small/medium/large option. - Pictures are adequately detailed, but not at the same level as MET or MC Nudes. You'll be able to zoom in on the tiny hairs shining in the sun on the curve of her hip in a few shoots and with a few models, but most aren't that detailed. That could be a major con for some, but the pro aspect is that very few of the zip files for photo shoots were more than 200MB. - Speeds seemed fine and the website was functional the entire week or two I was paying attention. Cons: - Fairly small site. - Ads on the page for pay-per-view movies that have absolutely nothing to do with the model. That's a huge gripe. Charge less if you want to try to make more money off of me once I've paid to get inside. I took five points off the score for that alone. - No small/medium/large option for zips. - Videos are probably afterthoughts and not the main selling point of the site, but they're still of mediocre quality and either have no sound or have techno music playing over any sound that might have actually been picked up by what was probably the video setting of the SLR being used. I watched a dozen or so clips and don't know what any of the women sounded like. - Not every model is shown nude, although that may be part of the appeal for some. - The attempt to make women who are clearly and quite obviously strippers seem to be girl-next-door amateurs with charming backstories. "Fun Fact: I've been a Hair Model" sort of stuff. Bottom Line: I joined almost entirely because I discovered a model who looks nearly exactly like a woman I was once involved with. Would I join it again in the future? No, probably not. There will be an occasional flash of inspiration, such as the lens looking down a flat stomach so that the bikini straps come up ever so slightly to bridge the area between the hipbones and the mons pubis, but I get the feeling those are mostly pleasant little accidents since most shots are the same poses in front of the same backgrounds, many of which involve corrugated metal buildings. I guess it's visually interesting the first couple of times, but after the tenth or fifteenth time it begins to seem like they just gave up and walked behind the U-Store-It again for another shoot in the same clothes as that last girl. Seriously. The same clothes. Not the same *style* of clothes. I don't mean the girls dress similarly. I mean the exact same clothes, the same swimsuit (a blue one piece spider web pattern comes to mind), the same lingerie, etc. After a while it starts making you feel the same way the U-Store-It backgrounds do. Do I recommend it? I can't recommend it at $30. I may recommend it at $15-20. I would probably recommend it at $10. There are some attractive models and some decent shots, but the site is fairly small and the As it is, and unless you're like me and wanted to get images of one specific model that are not available anywhere else, I think you're probably better off joining the "Only All" sites for $5/month more. 11-22-14  07:02pm Replies (1) Review 58 Open Life (0) 61.0 Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review. Pros: - Some HD videos - Photos available occasionally - Download managers work - A few big names Cons: - No longer updating - Errors when you go to view some photos. - Lots of BTS/Interview filler clips. - One of the more disappointing networks you'll find. Bottom Line: A very disappointing network. It has lots of big names and apparently owns the rights to their literal names to use for the websites, but they're no longer updating anything and quite of the content at the named sites is old, borderline unwatchable because the resolution is worse than a tube site, or just boring. It's not a bait and switch, but it's sort of like getting a bag of fake Legos. Yes, they sometimes stick together, and some might even stack with the real stuff, but they're disappointing and noticeably deficient. Here's something fun to get a feel for the site: Click to visit the site. Arrange the videos by date so that you see the most recent first, the initial video is a behind the scenes clip. A lovely curly haired brunette in a sexy catsuit. Awesome. Until you realize that it has no corresponding non-BTS video available for viewing. Worse? It's from 2015. So I'm going to go out on a limb and say the network isn't updating, and hasn't updated, for nearly three years. There are 100 pages of videos, and each page has 15 clips. So there are quite a few videos available. Strange navigation and designation choices. For example, a video from ashleyfires.com will be listed as from Openlife.com, while a video from sunnyleaone.com will be listed as such. Not a big deal, but fairly indicative of what to expect from the site. Other little things pop up, too. You'll find a video offered from tealconrad.com, but tealconrad.com isn't one of the sites available in your dropdown list. Others are things like clicking a video and getting: "Page not found - The page you requested has been moved, deleted or does not exist. Please choose a section in the menu to navigate through the website." There's no way to know how many clips are offered in hi definition, but around halfway through the pages I was finding 360p and HD clips next to one another. There are 60+ pages of 20 photo sets available, which is nice. Maybe. If they're actually there. Apparently there used to be more sites. Or more sites were planned. Who knows. There are brunob.com clips listed that give "not found" error messages when you click on them. Comically, choosing "Upcoming Videos" really sums the site up. Here's the error: "No Results!" Bottom line? Avoid. 04-17-18  04:34am Replies (1) Review 59 Perv Mom (0) 90.0 Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review. Pros: -Photo zips available -Good video quality and production values -Attractive MILFs -Appropriately priced Cons: -Not a huge site. Big enough to warrant the $10, though. -“Stepmom” thing is a bit played out. Friend’s mom should play bigger role. -Quite a few tattoos Bottom Line: Pervmom is a very good site about stepmoms doing very bad things. It has high production values, gorgeous older women, and even some decent acting here and there. It’s mostly filmed in a POV style (the male talent probably has a camera mount on his head). It’s a similar POV approach as VR, but in 2D. The majority of scenes are MF, but you’ll even find a rare lesbian scene or two. The one with Mindi Mink and a younger blonde is possibly worth the price of admission all by itself. There are established names like India Summer and Ariella Ferrara and some less well known talent like Olivia Blu and Sofie Marie. Something that was a very pleasant surprise was seeing actresses that I haven’t seen in a long time and how they’d matured. Marie McCray comes to mind. I was never a huge fan of hers, but she has aged nicely and makes a great MILF. Vanessa Cage comes across similarly. She was always an attractive young woman, but her MILF stage is – for my money - probably her best. Photo zips are available for each scene, but the ones I’d looked at appeared to just be still image grabs of the videos. The videos are high quality so that’s okay if you go in knowing what you’re getting, but it’s still comical at times because the image creation tool grabs a shot in between focusing and there will be a blurry grab every now and then. Download managers are allowed and the videos are offered in different sizes. I’m showing 960x540 / 2800kbps for the smaller file sizes (250MB or so for ten minute clips) and 1920x1080 / 12000kbps for the HD version of the same, which comes in around 1GB. The HD is certainly clearer and the better option, but the non-HD is very high quality and would’ve been considered great looking quality-wise not even five or so years ago. It’s a small site but priced accordingly. Price your services reasonably, get customers, put money back into site, grow, get more customers, put money back into site, grow, etc. I was impressed and I’ll likely join every year or so for the new content. Bottom line: Recommended 11-06-18  02:27am Replies (0) Review 60 PornDoe Premium (0) 90.0 Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review. Pros: - Videos and pictures - HD offerings for everything I saw - Very large site - Download managers allowed Cons: - Photos often seem to be stills from HD video - Tattoos, tattoos, and more tattoos - No cancellation link or email with login info, so pay attention to your info at signup Bottom Line: It's not a mega site like Realitykings or Brazzers, but it's very large. Hundreds of videos of beautiful (and sometimes not so beautiful) European women. There are quite a few different niches covered. They have everything from a silly and less degrading version of bangbus where a couple of goofballs drive around and pretend to pick up women who are willing to do all sorts of things in the passenger section, to gorgeous lesbians, to very average middle aged and older women swinging, to a few shemale clips. The only glaringly obvious thing that I didn't care much for, and it's completely a matter of personal taste, is the prevalence of tattoos. I know that's the direction the world has gone in for the moment, and the porn industry is just a reflection of society, but there are still a LOT of otherwise very attractive young (and old) women on the site who have a LOT of tattoos. There are also a lot that don't, though, and quite a bit of seemingly feminine focused scenes. Not glamcore, but filmed well with filters to soften the lighting, etc. Speaking of, if you're a fan of the lovely blonde named Caprice, this is the site for you. She is in dozens of clips here. I honestly think that you could grab all of her stuff and find you had gotten 1/10th of the site's total content. She's in that much. She gives convincing performances, though, and is terribly attractive, so I didn't mind. Multiple download options and the smaller HD and near-HD resolutions are appropriately sized. No 800mb "HD" videos that look like you could be on a tube site. FWIW, I don't recall seeing any non-HD clips offered for any of the videos, but I didn't click on every single one. As I mentioned in the cons, a lot of photos appear to just be stills from the videos. Go into the site expecting mostly video content and you won't be disappointed. Bottom line: One of my new favorite sites/networks. If you've been on the fence, give it a shot. 01-23-18  03:51am Replies (1) Review 61 Pornstar Network (0) 51.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Updated: 02-16-15  07:56am  (Update History) Reason: Discovered many of the streaming videos aren't available for viewing, either. Pros: Credit card appears to have been accepted without problems. Edit 2-16-15- *No longer applies, score lowered to 51 upon discovery, explanation below*- Non-HD streaming available for all your lower-quality streaming needs. Occasional HD content available for download without "upgrade". Cons: - Very little content available for downloading without "upgrading" - Download managers will queue multiple downloads but the links won't work for long (download links shift every few minutes). - Most of the highest commonly-available video quality appears to be 720x408. You can possibly get higher quality by falling for the "upgrade" racket, but I don't know for sure. - I seriously doubt the "upgrade" would suddenly make download managers work. Bottom Line: I got a $5 promo in an email for the site and thought, "Sure, why not?" Turns out $5 is overpriced. Want to see an example of the site's problems for yourself? Go to the link and click "pornstars", then click "R". Go to Ryan Conner. 26 videos. Awesome. But see all those little yellow boxes that say "Moviesz" at the bottom right of the previews? That indicates those videos aren't available unless you spend more money. So none of the videos on Ryan Conner's first page are available with the membership you just bought. Click on page 2. Scroll down, and you'll see four videos without "Moviesz" on the preview. Four of 26 listed are available for download with the membership you just paid for. "Hmm," you think, "maybe it's because they're older and she's not active anymore..." (I don't know if she is or not, but for the sake of argument let's go with it.) "Maybe we should try a more recent actress," you think while staying in the "R"s and clicking Roxanne Hall. "Wow, 86 videos. Awesome!" But only 13 of the 86 listed are available to you, and at least two of those are repeats. "Hmm, that's weird. Let's try someone else." Faye Reagan? 6 videos available out of 20 listed. Janet Alfano? 8 videos available out of 47 listed. Sharon Wild? 16 videos available out of 63 listed. Julie Silver? 9 of 36. Shawna Lenee? 6 of 25. Nikki Rhodes? 6 of 27. Marsh Lord? 2 of 23 Mellanie Monroe? 3 of 16 Raquel Devine? 1 of 41. Joey Lynn? 0 of 1. And it just keeps going like that. Go ahead, find your favorite and check. All of the ones with "Moviesz" in the corner are unavailable for downloading unless you pay more. (FWIW, you can view the unavailable-to-download videos in low to marginal streaming quality. You just can't download them.) Even the videos that are available for downloading are a pain to get since download managers don't work. In summary, only around 15% of the total videos you see offered are available for download unless you want to spend more money, and you'll have to babysit your computer to get what you want of the ones that *are* offered. The site somehow manages to feel like a ripoff even at $5. Avoid. **EDIT 2-16** Streaming video? Some of the clips are available for viewing, and up to half of them aren't. Here's what you get: http://i.imgur.com/tH7eKu0.jpg It happened enough that I decided to edit this review. Site owners: This is the kind of stuff that makes people stop visiting a *free* site, much less a pay one. 02-09-15  04:23pm Replies (3) Review 62 Pornstar Platinum Network (0) 72.0 Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review. Pros: - Lots of content - Specific stars have loads of content, which is a plus if you're a fan of those particular actresses - Allows download managers Cons: - Ads inside paywall - Unpredictable video quality and sizes - Download links missing for some sets - Good PU discount but watch for additional charges at signup. Bottom Line: Pornstar Platinum includes some decent names as a part of the network and quite a bit of content overall. It is one of the most “porn star” of porn sites that I've seen. The recent stuff is a lot of Alura Jenson, Joslyn James, Savana Styles, Ariella Ferrara, etc. Big fake tits and lots of tattoos in general. Not that there’s anything necessarily wrong with that and lots of people probably even like that style, but know what you’re getting going in. For an idea of the actresses involved as well as an idea of varying video quality, visit the preview page, click the “pornstars” link, and scroll down to “full list of pornstars.” There’s a bunch of them, but the “pornstar platinum models” ones at the top that you scrolled through to get to the full list are probably the most represented on the site. A lot of the “pornstar platinum model” actresses will be in solo clips, but they have a lot of overall content available on the site. It’s also worth noting that many of the actresses in the full list only have photo sets available. That’s fine, but again, be aware of what you’re getting. The downloads are named so that you can actually tell what you downloaded and who the actresses involved are. Thank you, pornstar platinum, for not filling up our hard drives with files named 4345_329_HD1080. It’s nice to be able to put a name in the search bar of the file explorer and find the actress you’re interested in seeing in your downloaded files. Photo zips are often HUGE. Unreasonably so for a non-art, non-Metart style site with what usually amounts to a guy with a camera taking pictures of something while using the lighting set up for the video that was being filmed. There were .mp4s and .wmvs available, but the wmv files I downloaded didn’t look that great. More specifically, they looked pretty bad. Many were enormous files (some nearly 1GB) and still blocky and tube-site-using-dial-up looking. For that matter, the videos are huge in general. The mp4s will routinely be 1GB+ and the wmvs (which look pretty bad overall and I recommend avoiding them) are often 500MB-1GB. The scenes will be split into lower-quality five-minute style clips, and that’s a nice option for someone who may want an actress in a particular moment for 50MB instead of the entire 1GB file. There are photo sets that don’t have download links for the set. Not a dealbreaker but it can be disappointing if you find a favorite actress. Bottom line: Not a bad site overall, and a pretty good site with the PU discount, especially if you have any interest in collecting every single thing bit of content available for one of the actresses included in the network. 01-09-19  02:31am Replies (0) Review 63 Private.com (0) 60.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - That feeling you get the very first time you log on as a member to the website of one of the older, classier purveyors of adult material who has shown the ability to combine eroticism, beauty, and proper cinematic techniques to create some of the better adult films in circulation since the '60s. - Um... - Not constant login requests like a few other big name sites. - If a grad student were researching "how companies unintentionally encourage the pirating of their material" then I'd recommend visiting this website. I think it could be an extremely useful example. Cons: - 250KB/s max on a 6Mbps DSL connection. ~150KB/s most of the time. - You're not allowed to queue downloads, so you'll only be able to get whatever you sit and monitor and click (and re-click when it fails) to download. Maybe you'll be able to get 8 scenes per day.. Maybe twelve? - Constant "503 Service Temporarily Unavailable" errors if you try to look at other pages after beginning a download. The site supposedly allows four connections, but I ran into trouble with less. - Repeated "size mismatch" errors when using download managers. - A laughably small collection of movies for a 50 year old company. - 350 movies wouldn't be so bad if they were decent quality, but most are comparable to early 2000's VCDs. Yep. That poor. I'd estimate only 25% or so are HD. - You'll be lucky to download the HD movies without the connection failing or the speed dropping to 0kbps, and, when it does, you'll be lucky to resume. If you can, guess what? You start over. Hooray Bottom Line: Videobox has almost 300 Private videos available, consistently fast connection speeds (600kbps+), and the .264 quality is better than Private.com's standard quality. Not to mention you can use download managers at VB and queue up dozens of movies to view later. It looks like they offer HD now, too, so there is absolutely no advantage to joining this site. It's a frustrating waste of money. Seriously, don't do it. You'll be disappointed that the site even exists and you'll think to yourself, "Wow, I just wasted $30" or "I could've put that money towards a _______ membership." Consider yourself warned. A bad experience. A waste of money. Stay away. 06-10-11  10:49am Replies (14) Review 64 Reality Kings (0) 87.0 Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review. Pros: - Huge site - Lots of different niches in the network (MILFs, natural bush, lesbian, etc.) - Good video quality overall, even with the non-HD .mp4 downloads. - .zip files of pictures and screengrabs - Lots of variety in body types, hair, and skin color. - Some good unknown actresses Cons: - Wow at the ads - Quite a few of the good unknown actresses apparently only did one scene and then disappeared forever. - Sometimes only .zip files of picture sets OR screengrabs, but not both - Some sites are no longer updating. - Can get a little repetitive and, unfortunately, boring. - No in-between video sizes. You can either get the smallish, easily-downloaded, lower-quality .mp4, or you can get the huge 3gb 1080p clip. Take your pick. - No 4K that I saw as of late April 2016 Bottom Line: I was pleased overall. It's a huge network with a ton of content. Most of it is fairly vanilla, but I bet you'll find something you like. The preview of the site allows you see most actresses and stills of scenes IIRC. Kudos to the site for this. Ads EVERYWHERE. It was mentioned in the previous review, but I wanted to reiterate it. I do approve of the lock icons on things that apparently aren't included in the membership, though. The Milfhunter and Moms Bang Teens sites were standouts for me, with MH having lots of attractive and seemingly legitimate MILF models, and the energy in the MBT scenes seemed to be a step above most other sites'. Not to mention MBT's great combination of gorgeous MILFs interacting with college aged couples. Video quality in the newer clips was good, but there was little to no in-between sizing. Huge and good, or small and okay. Take your pick. Hey websites: There are still quite a few of us who aren't on 100Mbps internet connections. Put something in between "Enormous HD" and "still way too big considering the fairly mediocre quality" sizes. See Milehigh media or Tainster to get an idea of how 540p can be a viable option. Download managers are a mixed bag. They work, although you'll likely run into login requests by your manager if too many downloads are queued up. Downloads that have already started will continue to work long after you've been logged out of the site, though. Other people mention a download limit, but I never encountered it. It was probably a combination of my connection speed, scene choices, and download manager, but it wasn't a problem for me. Bottom line: A huge site and hard to beat for a cheap price. A few inconveniences here and there, but a good way to get some good scenes from your favorite actresses. Would I join again? Yes. 06-24-16  09:29am Replies (0) Review 65 Sapphic Erotica (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Beautiful, clean women as convincing lesbians. - Great speeds (can saturate my 6Mbps DSL) - Allows full use of download managers. Downthemall in my case, and the site didn't restrict me from setting up videos to download overnight. Well done, sapphicerotica.com. - No gonzo mascara-running, gagging, put-a-foot-on-her-head-while-penetrating-her nonsense. - Very few fake breasts. Two thumbs up. The women are young, slim, and (mostly) natural. - Did I mention beautiful women smooching on other beautiful women? Cons: - Some scenes are a bit too "charged" to be convincing. Being so immediately orgasmic is likely a medical condition. - Some scenes are a bit silly. Not typical American XXX silly, but a bit much. I enjoy looking at four gorgeous women in tennis outfits coming in after a vigorous match and stripping/licking, but it's a bit unbelievable. Bottom Line: - A great site. Seriously. Especially the older stuff, and especially for the price. I think it's one of the few sites that everyone who enjoys XXX and finds women attractive should join at one time. - Flashiness and web design are personal style preferences, but I really like the simplicity of the site. - A pretty good model index. - "Clean" was used above, but I can't stress enough how nice it is to see attractive models who look like they've used shampoo within the last eight hours on a site. - The approach that some of the older, wonderful oral scenes used is being a bit neglected. Now there seems to be lots more fingers and toys and anal-licking. That's fine, but when you join and see the older vids and the girls sucking their lover's entire labial folds into their mouth and really dwelling on them... well, you'll see. The older videos have something the new ones lack. - Most women are fairly unknown, so it's a bit odd to see big stars in a few scenes. Kathia Nobili (although in my top 5 favorites) and Nessa Devil seem very out of place. - Probably 90% of the women are completely shaved in their pubic area. A personal preference thing, but I'd like for more of the women to have hair down there. Nothing unusual or fetishistic, but just natural and trimmed adult women. 09-08-11  05:03am Replies (0) Review 66 Scoreland (0) 84.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - Big, often beautiful women - Lots of focus on big breasts - Large site - Videos and photos available - Download managers work Cons: - Sometimes more big than beautiful - Lots of fake tits - Downloads fail just before finishing fairly often - Flash/java heavy = often unresponsive site design Bottom Line: Scoreland is a site that offers a large amount of content containing mostly larger women. It’s not always larger women, though. Sometimes it’s average sized women with large breasts. To my eyes more often than not those women have huge fake tits, but occasionally some of those will even have natural breasts. The good: There are often only photos for the older material, which is fine considering how long Score has been in business. On the bottom of the website they note that they’ve been in business for 25 years, and I’d guess that there are still a lot of offerings on their website that span that length of time. And that’s a good thing. The newer offerings are usually available in multiple formats and even five minute clips of those multiple formats, and I commend the website for taking this approach. 720p is the highest resolution available for download as of September 2018. They look fine, but topping out at 720 is noticeable in this modern day and age of ultra high definition and virtual reality offerings. There are none of the latter that I saw, by the way. There are often photos and videos available for the newer shoots, but occasionally you’ll find only one or the other. The not so good: Download managers work, but it’s not unusual to try to download a video and see it fail right before it finishes and yield a “server error” message. And my “right before” I mean the last 10% of the download. I never could determine that it corresponded with a particular time of day or file size. Sometimes the file would finish and sometimes it wouldn’t. It’s irritating and could certainly influence one’s view of the site. The site seems to be based heavily on java script. So much so that it won’t show you anything if you’re running a blocker. I also noticed sluggish responses and images that wouldn’t always load unless you scrolled the page down. That would somehow trigger the images that should’ve loaded when the page was initially visited. Not a huge deal but definitely another annoyance. Bottom line: A good site with a lot of attractive larger ladies. There are some minor irritations here and there, but I would join again. 10-16-18  04:19am Replies (0) Review 67 Seduced By A Cougar (0) 52.0 Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review. Pros: - Attractive MILFs doing very naughty things. - A HUGE amount of content. Sort of. Wait, no. Nevermind. - Multiple download options. Cons: - Downloads will begin but then often time out and fail. - Site is no longer part of the larger network. - Ads inside after you've entered the paywall. Bottom Line: NO LONGER A CLONE SITE Seduced by a Cougar is no longer a clone site. It is now officially a standalone, glorious, independent site that is not part of any network and which you have to purchase access to just because you like what this single site has to offer. Sort of. Because if movies of good looking big (fake) breasted women undressing down to lingerie before seducing younger guys is your thing, then buddy have I got a web site for you. All you've got to do is invent a time machine, travel back to this time last year, and you can enjoy everything this site has to offer. And boy, let me tell you, this time last year it offered a lot. This site was part of the Naughty America network, and you could see all of these lovely ladies PLUS the other 40 whatever sites on the network. $20/month for probably thousands of videos of all types of women in all types of scenarios, all filmed well, and the newer ones in HD. Let me tell you, it was a great network. One of the best. A, if not *the* top tier. Oh, sorry. Let me get back to today's Seduced by a Cougar and Naughty America. Now? Click the join button. See that little sentence at the top? The one that says "Become a member for this month's new releases." They mean that literally. Pay your $20 and you get this month's new releases. Let's see, that's... One video. You get one video. Comically, that video is a re-encoded release of an old video. Want more? Go back and look at the join page. Scroll down. Yeah, it's down past the screen cutoff, so I understand why you missed it. See the part where it says "Membership Upgrades Available Inside!"? They mean that literally, too. Your first membership fee is to allow you ACCESS to pay another membership fee if you want the stuff that's older than one month. Go browse the NA forums. They're a trainwreck right now since they've moved to this new subscription model. AVOID is too light of a word for this level of caution against joining, but it's the best I've got. AVOID 08-21-18  02:51am Replies (0) Review 68 Sexy Hub (0) 85.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - Multiple encoding options for videos, 720 and 1080 included - Photos available as .zip files. - Multiple options available for size/quality of those .zip files. - Gorgeous women and a good mixture of MILFs and college aged women. No silly forced "youngness" that I saw (pigtails, striped socks, etc.). - Actual pubic hair on a few models. It's not a hairy site and there are more shaved than not, but thank goodness, and please let this be the beginning of a trend back to grown women looking like grown women again. - Download managers work. - No download limits that I found. - Good searchable naming system. Actress and site names included in the video/photo file. Example: Mom_Nancy_12345, meaning from the "Mom" site, starting Nancy. Good job, site designers. I'm amazed that seems so difficult for most sites to incorporate. Cons: - Ads inside. I know that's becoming more and more common, but I still paid to get in. Want to advertise? Offer two prices. One slightly cheaper and ad-subsidized, one a couple of bucks higher and ad-free. (FWIW, if the ads are subsidizing a reduced rate/discount then I don't mind so much. I suspect they're there for everyone, though.) - Scenes won't always have model's names listed. Members will often make a comment below noting who it is, but that's the site's job, especially when linking to all of a model's vids. - George. Is. Everywhere. - Occasional dead links - Models will be named in the video (literally- their name will be part of the video file name), but the actress won't be listed on the website. See Kirschley. OR vice versa. The actress will be listed, but the video links will be dead. See "Afternoon Rubdown" and "Her Plaything". - Not all videos have photo sets. - Can be a bit repetitive. Bottom Line: Overall a good site with fairly good navigation and just a few flaws here and there. Gorgeous models. Almost all are European. Download managers (downthemall at least) worked fine with the videos, but the photo .zip files would often time out. The site logs you out occasionally, but it's more of an inconvenience than an irritation. HD video options exist, but the lighting/filters/quality often makes the 1080p clips look a lot like the non-HD option. The 480 clips look very good and are very reasonably sized. There are hundreds of scenes over four sites on the network. MILFs (Mom), lesbians (lesbea), reality-show type lesbians (girlfriends), tasteful sex (dane jones), and massage room scenario (appropriately named "massage room"). There are models that I've never seen anywhere else and who apparently did nothing else (Nancy IIRC), and a few recognizable stars (Zuzanna, Szilvia, Klarissa etc.). There are also a few pleasant surprises like finding the beautiful and nicely-aged Rene, a favorite from Sapphic Erotica that I haven't seen in years, starring in multiple scenes on the lesbian sites. I would guess George is in at least half of all the m/f scenes. Go George, but it gets sort of old seeing him everywhere. Very vanilla sex and lots of creampie or stomach finishes on the m/f scenes. I don't recall any anal, and definitely no drool-streaked-eyeliner-and-that-guy's-foot-on-her-head-while-roughly-entering-her-from-behind sort of stuff. Thank goodness. This is all just attractive, tasteful couples with good, if sometimes a bit soft, lighting. I'd like to see a bit more age-appropriate lingerie including teddies, stockings, garters, etc., but there's nothing wrong with what is in place. Would I join again? Yes. 04-06-16  08:16am Replies (5) Review 69 Stiffia.com (0) 62.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Decent selection of genres/movies/scenes. Lots of euro stars. - Magma and Pinko were pretty much the entire reason I joined. - They claim you'll get access to another site after each month of your membership. Cons: - Can't tell too much of a difference beyond size between HD and non-HD clips, and I suspect they're all just DVD rips by someone who doesn't know/care. - Logs you out every half hour and you fill out a captcha to login. Every. Single. Time. And 50% of the time the captcha will tell you it was wrong even if you know you entered it correctly. - PITA to use overall. - Slow and unresponsive. - Every downloaded clip is named something like "scene_hd" or "scene_sd_high". No numbers, no nothing. You will have no idea which movie, scene, or actress is involved. - Broken or missing links. - Actresses show up as having X number of scenes, but that's apparently over the network as a whole (and it doesn't point you in the direction of the other sites/scenes). A site showing six scenes for a particular actress may just have one clip available. Bottom Line: Possibly the most irritating and poorly conceived and executed pay site/network I've ever joined. Captcha login requirements every twenty minutes or so. Random dead links. Download links missing entirely for some scenes. Frequent "Site down for maintenance" and 503 errors when trying to login. Then the site is immediately available upon refresh. Download managers won't work because download links change rapidly. If it took 15 minutes to download one movie the next one will give you an error message because the link no longer works or the system has already logged you out. Quite a few movies wouldn't finish downloading because link was apparently killed *during* the download. Every picture ZIP file I downloaded was corrupted and would not unzip. Some download links downloaded entire movies that the scene was pulled from (but note there is no option anywhere to download the whole movie), and some scenes were missing download links for the scene entirely. Out of a dozen or so pages of actresses listings on the individual sites, the last half (or more) won't even have photos associated with the name. Just the same blank silhouette for everyone. If you're lucky you can click on it and wait for the really unresponsive website to load and maybe show a thumbnail of a scene showing her face, though. ------- This network has tremendous potential, but it's too much trouble to use. It *may*, might, maybe, POSSIBLY be worth the $36 annual special I've seen offered, but even then you're going to be constantly irritated unless the site owners make some major changes to make things more user friendly. 05-22-15  09:32am Replies (0) Review 70 Tainster (0) 69.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - Very reasonable PU discount - Beautiful models in nice clothes - Some videos offer HD - Some videos offer pic .zips - Search function works okay sometimes Cons: - Search function often can't seem to find actresses - Oh well, because a LOT of actresses aren't named anyway - Ads, ads, and more ads. - Site isn't very responsive. I suspect it has a lot to do with all the ads and the 10 chat boxes that load on the side of every page. - Ridiculous outfit choices at times. Is a woman really going to continue to wear a fancy hat or constantly fuss with a long, slinky, bothersome purse on one arm during a half hour threesome in her own home? (Very minor con in light of all the rest, though) - Videos are all named the same thing, so you'll end up with a pile of "540p_fullcomplete" files with no idea who or what is in any of them. - Navigation is crap. It would often send me to the main updates page (for all sites) when trying to click to the next page of a specific site's content. - .zip files often have errors in the included/unzipped .jpgs. - Way, WAY too much focus on the wet-and-messy fetish. Bottom Line: A lot of the scenes on the network share content. Example: Fully Clothed Sex and Fully Clothed Pissing scenes are exactly 100% the same with the addition (subtraction, technically, since those frames are edited out in the FCS side) of urine. I'm not into that, and it's irritating to watch a scene with beautiful women glammed up in very attractive outfits and one lady's blouse is suddenly completely soaked for no reason. Well, no reason in THAT video, since it's not the urine site, but yeah, you know the actual reason and it ruins the scene. They often try to cover it up by pouring water or wasting champagne on the models, but once you realize the scenes are shared it doesn't matter. If her clothes are wet in the FCS scenes, it's urine. Shared scenes and overall video listings for models is not representative of actual content. Take Kate Gold as an example. She has 232 scenes listed (HELL YEAH!), but only about 30 aren't party-orgy scenes. There may be some good stuff in the party scenes, but it's more trouble than it's worth to slog through the photos to see if she's actually involved or only credited because she happened to pass in front of the camera. That means I, and I suspect others, are not going to bother with the party clips (I'm not wasting my time grabbing an 800mb file for 30 seconds of an actress no matter how much I enjoy watching her work- see Rady in the scene titled "720p_fullcomplete" (haha, get it?) for a great example). Of the 30 or so remaining scenes, around half are shared overall (see previous paragraph re:urine), so she only has a dozen or so unique and possibly desirable clips out of the 200+ listed. Siddi? 32 scenes listed, 2 unique non-party scenes. Sindy Vega? 17 scenes listed, 3 non-party scenes. Sweet Cat? 149 scenes listed, a dozen or so non-party scenes. Zoe Fox? 29 scenes, but only 1 non-party scene. It goes on and on like that. Ads and up-sells all over the place once you're inside. Checking the box that says "skip the portal the next time I log in" is apparently meaningless and does nothing to prevent the ads from appearing the next time you log on. When you cancel your subscription a banner appears at the top telling you that you've canceled your subscription and "Please Click here we got a special offer for you." Very irritating. It looks like their sister site "Sindrive" (very easy to find if you just remember to look for the advertisements on every page) is where they're putting the good stuff these days, along with the 4K videos. FWIW, if it were me I would've given the party-orgy clips their own $10 site and made Tainster a cheap $5 hey-let's-get-what-we-can vessel for all the other sites they advertise for. BUT Even after all of that, the worst part of the site is probably that all the newer content has started to be forcibly blended together into the WAM (wet and messy) niche. Parties? Everyone has something poured onto them. Lesbians using a wand massager on one another? Oil. Pornstars ostensibly at home? Urine. Then there are all the actual WAM sites, which are around half the network already. It's a shame, because the site had so much potential. They obviously even had a brief period of time when they tinkered with straponcum.com style lesbian scenes using MILFS/glam, and even had mff threesomes using the same idea, but they stopped that approach and went for large fake rubber cocks spraying ridiculous amounts of lotion out of gloryholes (?) to get the WAM element. Bottom line: If you like attractive, well-dressed European women getting urine or lotion on their clothes, and/or if you are looking for a place that offers lots of carefree women letting strangers pour any number of things onto their nice clothes (and that's VERY much a fantasy, btw) before suddenly having sex in a dance club while none of the other patrons care orgy fantasy videos, this site is probably worth checking out. Would I join again? Unlikely. 07-13-16  10:12am Replies (0) Review 71 Team Skeet (0) 89.0 Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review. Pros: - Tremendous amount of content. - Varied niches in multiple sites. - Good mix of skin color, body types, etc. - HD videos. - No download limits. - Good navigation and search function. - Download managers work. - Promo offers - Great preview. You can pretty much see what you're getting right up to the point of watching the videos. Cons: - Lots of girl next door types, but he innocent young girl mystique is easily broken by yes-I'm-a-stripper tattoos on some models. - "Innocent young girl" seems a bit forced at times. Silly oversized glasses, pigtails, big hair bows, striped socks, etc. I get the fantasy aspect, but often less is more. - Um... Let's see... Not enough MILFs? (Joke, btw.) Seriously, there are very few cons I can think of. If you lean towards college-aged girls, you probably need to try this site. Bottom Line: This review will be fairly sort of short mostly because there is very little to criticize. Ads inside (and what kept the review from being in the 90s), some rare broken links, and... yeah, that's about it. This is definitely one of the better sites I've joined so far as the user is concerned. I'd put it right up there with Anilos / Nubiles and Sapphic Erotica as a site everyone should probably join at least once if they have any interest whatsoever in the content. It really does seem to be geared towards the user. Even the preview of the site gives a surprisingly good idea of what's inside before joining. There are multiple video options, and a "best of" choice that is similar to (IIRC) Naughty America's small 5-minute clips. I really appreciate sites that do that, and the only other request I would ask is to offer it in varying quality as well. There's the occasional oddity like a broken link here and there, or pleasant surprises like the majority of the site being typical American BangBros/NA/Brazzers style of filming before stumbling onto strangely attractive and very European models and filming. Luna comes to mind: http://www.teamskeet.com/t1/profile/view.../luna/?nats=MDowOjIy But the good very much outweighs the bad. Bottom line: If you like this genre then definitely give this site a shot. Webmaster- Do y'all run a MILF site? 03-28-16  05:48am Replies (0) Review 72 Teen Dreams (0) 88.0 Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review. Pros: - 4K available for newer videos - Tons of content, both photos and videos - Download managers are allowed Cons: - No way to mark favorite actresses that I could see - Download files are often huge when considering the resolution -That distinctly Russian style of recent videos Bottom Line: Teendreams is a huge megasite with thousands of images and videos going back well over a decade. I saw what were clearly old photo sets that had 2009 as the “last appeared” date, but I’d be surprised if they were any newer than 2005 or so. I could be wrong, of course, but that’s just an eyeball guess. And that access to older content is a very good thing. No, the quality of the older sets might not be achingly sharp, but they can’t be compared to modern photos and videos because of the limitations of the times. Just having access to the older content is a good thing, and the site is probably worth joining for nothing else other than seeing some favorite models in the earliest days of their careers. Irina Bruni is a good example. I’m a big fan of hers and saw some early photo sets from 2010 or so that I’d never seen anywhere else. There are lots of other examples of this kind of discovery all through the site. I’d probably recommend it just on this element alone. Download managers work, and the site doesn’t log you off constantly and require you to re-login. Good job webmasters. That’s the kind of thing that keeps paying customers coming back to give you more money. The new videos are offered in resolutions up to huge 4K files if that's your thing. The not-as-good: It’s not uncommon to find an actress with two or three different sets under different names or in a different set including another actress’ name. It's more an inconvenience than anything, but you always get the feeling that you’re probably missing some content when you find sets of a favorite actress. The distinctly Russian style of some newer videos is off-putting at times. You know the characteristics: The guys have mullets (often buzzcuts on sides), the women will have flat bangs and/or brightly colored plastic jewelry/socks/etc., and the scenes will seem washed out or overly beige. The sets will download to your drive with no identifying elements whatsoever, so you’ll end up with a bunch of “10101_1242” style zip files or “49387_85844_1080” video file names. Again, not a huge deal, but a definite inconvenience and something that requires extra work if you want to organize scenes by a particular actress. None of it is bad enough that I would discourage checking the site out if you have any interest. Bottom line: Recommended, with a few reservations. I'd definitely re-join. 12-24-18  03:51pm Replies (1) Review 73 Trans Angels (0) 87.0 Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review. Pros: - Multiple download resolutiomns - Photos and videos available - Download managers allowed - Exclusive videos Cons: - Not the biggest site - Watch out for pre-checked “offers” on signup - In house billing. Can’t do the trick to force an error and get to epoch. Bottom Line: A very good site if this is your flavor of kink. Good production values, a decent amount of effort put into presenting an atmosphere and premise. SM-SM, SM-M, and SM-F scenes. HD videos are available but even the lower resolutions look good. Download managers are allowed but the site will log you off occasionally. Not a big deal - and very much not like the sites that kick you out every 30 minutes or so – but something to check on if you queue up a bunch of clips and walk away for a few hours. The videos are exclusive to this site and look nice. Good lighting, good angles, and overall competent film-making. There’s a good mixture of different types of action. To me the scenes involving genetic females are some of the high points, but again, it depends on your taste in kink. Not all of the actors can do everything (I’d imagine hormones affect that particular ability), but I’d say the majority of the shemales on the site can perform intercourse with the other participants. There are some good scenes waiting to be discovered, too. A sleepover with Jessica Fox (SM) and Bailey Brooke (F) is fairly ridiculous in its setup, but the action overall makes it forgivable. Interestingly, although the videos are offered in HD and the high resolutions look very crisp, I found it’s often better to go with the lower resolutions in order to not see some of the obvious scars and other things that disrupt the “futa” style fantasy. Bottom line: Recommended if you like this sort of thing. 11-13-18  06:57am Replies (3) Review 74 Tug Pass (0) 73.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Decent sized site/network with lots of clips, but not very large data-wise since the videos aren't huge - Improved video quality since last review - Allows download managers - Good download speeds - Pictures sometimes available along with videos, although sometimes just for viewing and not always as .zip Cons: - Ads behind the paywall. - All videos are named the same thing ("high") - Some links to photo sets that go nowhere other than a "back to video" page. - No video quality choices. - Directing/editing isn't well thought out at times - Older videos are still really low quality - $30 seems a bit overpriced. Bottom Line: I was a member years ago and was unimpressed, but I thought I would give Clubtug another shot since I saw some bigger names listed as models. The network/site has definitely gotten better. It still comes across as amateurish in a lot of ways (yes lots of amateur models, but also an amateur site), but it's improving. My feeling was that it's mostly a handjob network with a bit of intercourse (Tease POV IIRC), but don't expect much beyond masturbation and a bit of oral here and there. There was a large popup ad for other sites after you login that you have to click "no thanks, continue to the site" (or similar) to get to the site you paid for, and ads throughout the site. Each site on the network required an individual login as well, but the sites don't seem to log you out frequently, so I'm okay with the individual login requests. One of the big problems with the site in the past was tube-quality videos (or worse). This has improved, and according to VLC the newer clips are 720. There are no video quality choices, however, and the old tube-quality clips are designated as "high" exactly like the new 720 clips, so there's no way to know which you're getting until you view it. The videos are fairly watchable now, although there are some bad choices like stationary filming, poor visibility from bad angles, or attempting to use a macro ring to light up-close scenes similar to Amateur Allure. I don't care much for it there, and it's even less successful here. The lighting washes out the models' skin and they lose most detail in their face/body, and the cumshot washes out the same way on the stark white, flat face. I appreciate trying something new, but it's a shame the actresses like India Summer and Alexis Fawx weren't just filmed with a good lens on a mid-level Canon SLR with decent natural lighting. Other problems are things like models giving a handjob while fully clothed and then abruptly wearing bra and panties before abruptly being naked. I don't think a storyline is necessary, but 30 extra seconds of transitioning through the models undressing would help the scenes overall. That said, there are some good choices like POV scenes with a naked model sitting between a (laying on his back) man's legs with HER legs open as she masturbates him. Those scenes are fairly inspired and were nice to see. I think $20 is probably a more appropriate non-promo day-to-day price, but the site's owners have brought in some bigger names like Veronica Avluv, Dava Foxx, and India Summer, so the $30 isn't unreasonable in light of attracting and paying talent. I personally would recommend the owners get more of Christina Sky(e?) and the actress named Harley. Both seemed fairly interested in what they were doing, and that goes a long way in making the scenes believable/enjoyable. Not to mention you can probably get five or more scenes for what India or Avluv charges for one. FWIW, there are still some less attractive models and the videos from my first review are still there, but the quality of models has improved over the last couple of years. Bottom line: I reviewed the network under Clubtug last time and they only earned a 62, but the details have improved enough that I'm adding ten+1 points for them putting in the effort and making it a decent site. It's not an especially innovative or outstanding site, but if there are more than a few actresses there doing things you enjoy watching, it's probably worth checking out at least once, especially if you can get a discounted rate. 08-27-16  05:21pm Replies (0) Review 75 Wankz.com (0) 83.0 Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review. Pros: - Large site - Epoch as payment processor - Lots of variety in actresses, scenes, etc. - 4K content - Didn't encounter any download limits (FWIW, I don't have the speeds to churn through the site and grab a bunch of 4K vids like the other reviewer mentioned) - Photos often available for download - Lots of variety in skin tones, sizes, hair, etc. - Good exposure to some really great stripper/porn star names. My personal favorite: Strokahontas Cons: - "Embed" instead of a download link was encountered more than once. Not really sure how that's supposed to work on a paid subscription. - I'm not positive it's not just a clone of the Lethal site. It looked very familiar. Can one of the PU admins confirm with the owners? - Photos would be an option, but there would be no photos on the linked page and nothing available to download - Listed video sizes and .zip file sizes were consistently wrong. Bottom Line: The less-good. None is really too bad and none are deal breakers, but it was noticed more than a few times: Pics and vids organization is a bit of a mess. Sizes will be listed beside the downloads, but 50%+ are incorrect. 1080p sizes will be listed as the same as the 720p clips, and photos' zip sizes will often not seem to correspond to anything in particular. It was nice to have the sizes listed, but many (most?) of the time the sizes listed for the larger video and photo download options were wrong. No big deal, but it was always very noticeable. I had been a member of Lethal a long time ago, and quite a few of the videos looked familiar to me. I'm not sure if they weren't just similar scenes with the same actresses, but I left wondering if Wankz and Lethal are the same or at least share a lot of content. Maybe admin can confirm with the sites. There were some dead-end links that led to photo pages with nothing to view or download, and there were occasionally download links that led to tiny ~4kB files that were clearly not the 30 minute clip you were trying to download. The good: One of the best parts of this site is the naming structure. Yes, I know it has little to do with video quality or quantity, but let's consider it a rare quality-of-life situation. I run into so many sites that allow download managers and unlimited downloads, and after you load your queue up with clips you discover the video that came from a page titled "Beautiful Milf Kayla Synz Gets Some Help Folding Her Laundry" ends up being saved in your download folder as something like "39030_01_HD" or the even worse "video." Not Wankz. If you download a clip from a page titled "Sexy Secretary Alana Evans gets drilled just right," you will end up with a video titled "sexy-secretary-alana-evans-gets-drilled-just-right." Even when the video doesn't mention the actress by name, it will at least give you an idea of what is happening in the scene. For instance, "an-office-romance-gets-really-hot-and-heavy" is an actual name of a clip. You might not immediately know who is in it, but at least you have an idea of what's happening compared to 77327_02_HD. Well done, Wankz. They offer 4K downloads. I don't have anything that is able to properly view or oherwise take advantage of downloading those huge clips, so I can't comment on quality. Many/most of their newer clips offered portable, SD, 720p, and 1080p download options, and the older clips would often be a choice between two fair-to-decent quality options. They looked okay and the quality was acceptable considering they were older scenes. Content-wise it's fairly standard stuff you'd see at competitors like Reality Kings, Brazzers, etc., but I never got the feeling this was on the same level. It's still a good site, but it's like watching your local college play football before going to see the playoffs. The first guys were fun to watch and did a good job, but the top teams are almost playing an entirely different game on an identical field. Would I recommend? Yes, and what especially lifted them out of the "average" range is the recognizable naming of files. I understand it's a little more work, but the coordination between files seems like it would be easy to do when setting up the system, and it's a shame we can't see that from websites more often. 11-21-16  02:44am Replies (1) Shown : 51-75 of 75 Page : Page 1 2 3    < Previous Page Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.32 seconds.