Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
DOMAI
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
2 updates every week on Monday and Thursday
Lots of smiling in the photo sets - I like seeing happy girls
BOTD Archive - still accessible for free off the legacy site (legacy.domai.com) - updated daily, 15 beauties are rotated through
Lifetime memberships are offered
Navigation and site layout has been updated to match the style of MA (although the old legacy style is still available)
Site response is generally quite good - good download speed, good refresh from page to page, etc.
Picture quality is superb
More girl-next-door types here
Lots of nature sets, because nudity is natural, and nature is natural, so what better place to do your first nude photo shoots than in nature? These do seem to be the first photo shoots for a large number of these models.
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. The girls are beautiful and the settings are beautiful.
The site uses TLS 1.2 so passwords, etc are secure in transit
Part of the Met Art network – customer support is superb |
| Cons: |
Only two updates per week
Pictures only - no videos
Price for monthly is up to $29.99 (it’s not hard to find discounts to $19.99), even though the legacy site still mentions $9.99 as the price - and the price is the same whether you join from the legacy site or the updated version. There typically also sales for all the sites in the MA network around holiday times (like Valentine's Day) for $9.99 - so definitely look for those.
Most girls have only a small number of photo sets (like one or two or three), so if you really like a girl you may not get to see that much of her
Model info is really minimal here, and in many cases non-existent.
DOMAI started up in 1997, but very little of the pre-2005 content is available
Very little striptease action, which goes along with the idea of “just the nudes ma’am”
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. This is a very tame site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Some stats:
1533 Models
161 Contributing Photographers
3916 Galleries
Long one of my favorite sites, I’ve been a member of this site for years, and ponied up for a lifetime membership in 2017. The focus here is quite simply pictures of beautiful nude women. In fact the founder of the site referred to the philosophy being “simple nudes”, and that is still the governing idea here.
While full nudity is throughout the site (most of the sets the model is completely nude starting at picture 1, so not a lot of striptease here), Domai sticks to the tamer side of things. In fact, a few years back, the original founder of Domai (Eolake Stubblehouse) added a sister site called Goddess Nudes to allow them to show more private parts.
There is a lot of overlap between Goddess Nudes and Domai, with some sets appearing on both sites and only a couple of pictures added or removed. Since both of the sites have been acquired by Met Art, the sites appear to be a little more distinct than in the past, but even Goddess Nudes isn’t remotely hard core, and Domai is no longer afraid of open leg shots.
There are 3 other sister sites in the Met Art network that are very similar to DOMAI – Erotic Beauty, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica-Archives. Each of them now updates twice a week, and there is considerable overlap between the models and the photographers. They are also not nearly as distinct from each other as they used to be when they started out. It’s also not unusual for a set for a girl appearing on one of the sites, and then a bit later a second site will pick up the same set, although with a slightly different selection of photos
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on all of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights. |
|
02-18-24 08:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
DOMAI
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
5 updates every week Monday through Friday
Lots of smiling in the photo sets I like seeing happy girls
BOTD Archive still accessible for free off the legacy site (legacy.domai.com) updated daily, 15 beauties are rotated through
Lifetime memberships are offered
Navigation and site layout has been updated to match the style of MA (although the old legacy style is still available)
Site response is generally quite good good download speed, good refresh from page to page, etc.
Picture quality is superb
More girl-next-door types here
Lots of nature sets, because nudity is natural, and nature is natural, so what better place to do your first nude photo shoots than in nature? These do seem to be the first photo shoots for a large number of these models.
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. The girls are beautiful and the settings are beautiful. |
| Cons: |
What? You cant post updates on the weekend?
Pictures only no videos
Price for monthly is up to $29.99 (its not hard to find discounts to $19.99), even though the legacy site still mentions $9.99 as the price and the price is the same whether you join from the legacy site or the updated version.
Most girls have only a small number of photo sets (like one or two or three), so if you really like a girl you may not get to see that much of her
Model info is really minimal here, and in many cases non-existent.
DOMAI started up in 1997, but very little of the pre-2005 content is available
Very little striptease action, which goes along with the idea of just the nudes maam
The emphasis is on beauty, not sex. This is a very tame site.
No SSL is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about. |
| Bottom Line: |
Some stats:
1095 Models
142 Contributing Photographers
2922 Galleries
Long one of my favorite sites, Ive been a member off and on for at least 10 years. The focus here is quite simple pictures of beautiful nude women. In fact the founder of the site referred to the philosophy being simple nudes, and that is still the governing idea here.
While full nudity is throughout the site (most of the sets the model is completely nude starting at picture 1, so not a lot of striptease here), Domai sticks to the tamer side of things. In fact, a few years back, they added a sister site called Goddess Nudes to allow them to show more private parts. There is a lot of overlap between Goddess Nudes and Domai, with some sets appearing on both sites and only a couple of pictures added or removed. Since both of the sites have been acquired by Met Art, the sites appear to be a little more distinct than in the past, but even Goddess Nudes isnt remotely hard core, and Domai is no longer afraid of open leg shots.
This is how they describe the difference on the Goddess Nudes web page: Or you could say that on Domai the sexuality is in the background, on Goddess Nudes it's in the foreground.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on all of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights. |
|
03-15-17 07:40pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
3
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates
4701 Photo Sets, 1979 Models, 186 Artists there is a lot of content here
Generally high quality photography
Many of the models are gorgeous
Wide variety of settings and styles
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2) |
| Cons: |
No videos at all
Considerable overlap with DOMAI
Most models have only one or two sets
Occasional clunkers in the sets
Suffers the same occasional logon glitches as all the sites in the Met Art network. Maybe once or twice a month that can last for a couple of hours. |
| Bottom Line: |
Erotic Beauty is a sister site in the Met Art network. It was previously named Met Art Models. The updates on the current incarnation of the site date back to 2005. Its core competency is soft core nude photography.
It generally has a feeling of being a landing spot for sets that, for whatever reason, were not placed on Met Art itself. This does not mean that the content isnt good, although overall I would say the stuff on Met Art averages out to higher quality than the stuff on Erotic Beauty. There are fewer models youd rank a 9 or 10 on EB as opposed to MA. Maybe more at EB would be called pretty than gorgeous. But then, A Pretty Girl is Like a Melody, so pretty is nothing to sneeze at, especially if shes naked.
One issue I have is the considerable overlap with DOMAI, also in the Met Art network. For example, say a photographer goes out with a model and takes 500 pictures at a single shoot. Then maybe 50 or 60 of those will be posted on DOMAI in a set. Then a few months later, a slightly different 50 or 60 photos from the same shoot will be posted on Erotic Beauty. (Sometimes EB gets them first, sometimes DOMAI). This can actually be a good thing if you really loved a particular shoot with a model, since it gets you more photos of that girl. But it does feel a bit like you are being taken advantage of when you come across something like this.
EB would also sometimes post 50 pics from one shoot, and then later 50 more from the same shoot, and sometimes even a third posting from the same shoot. This was quite common a few years ago, but is pretty rare now from what I can tell.
While the site does not loudly proclaim itself as an all-natural site, the covers for their photo sets all bear the mark EroticBeauty.com Naturally Beautiful Amateur Nudes. And I think there are very few models with breast enhancements on this site.
The site navigation and style is very similar to Met Art, which in my opinion is excellent. Favorites, comments, all the stuff you would expect. Browsing and download speeds are good.
Ive seen other reviews mention something about the navigation, and not being able to paginate through easily when browsing. One way to get around this is once you see something like page01 at the end of the URL, you can replace the 01 with any page number you want and so jump to the middle of the series.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
Regular pricing for Erotic Beauty is 29.99 per month, or 99.99 per year. The PU discount brings it down to 19.99 per month.
The bottom line is there is more than enough content here to keep you busy for a month. |
|
01-31-18 08:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates, either photosets or videos (vids are one or two per week).
Excellent photo and video quality
Good download and browsing speeds
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Beautiful girls |
| Cons: |
Site layout is not quite as good as Met Art, but still better than a lot of sites on the interwebs.
Limited Model Information measurements and home country
Very little striptease action here in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
No sexual activity of any kind the emphasis is on beauty. |
| Bottom Line: |
Errotica Archives is another site in the Met Art network. Originally it was a site for the single photographer Erro, who also posted frequently at Met Art, but it has evolved to be more of a multi-photographer site. Erro continues to contribute, but only a few times per month.
What I always considered one of the biggest strengths of this site was the long term relationship some of the models had with the site. For example, Iveta has 41 galleries posted from 2007 to 2013, with a handful after that. Nikky has 43 galleries posted from 2006 to 2013. Belle (aka Indiana A) has 37 sets from 2011 to 2015. Antea appears in 204 galleries (!) from 2006 to 2017.
Lately, it has started to feel a lot more like its sister site, Erotic Beauty. It seems like just one more place for various models to post a set or two that didnt get posted at Met Art. There is still a lot of high quality content here, but Errotica Archives no longer feels as unique as it once did.
Almost all of the photo sets and videos involve solo girls, and the ones that have two or more are just nude girls near another no sexual activity is going on.
The girls are very beautiful, rarely shy, and photographed with great technical skill. The site performs well.
The site boasts 319 Models. Its hard to get a good count on the total number of photo galleries, but the main site goes back to 2005, and the archives contain some sets from 2004. There are over 600 videos.
The PU discount of $19.99 for a month is a good value. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
You should certainly find plenty of material here to occupy yourself for a full month if you take the plunge. And if any of your old favorites have an extensive representation here, you will think that you hit the jackpot. |
|
07-30-17 06:39pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
5
|
Eternal Desire
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Regular updates typically every-other-day
Very high quality photography
The girls are gorgeous
Good variety of settings for the photo shoots
Does use HTTPS (TLS 1.2)
A little more explicit than Met Art
For new users, billing is with ccBill if joining from within the Met Art network, the processor is Rocket Pay |
| Cons: |
Daily updates would be nice
Susceptible to the same occasional logon glitches that hit the Met Art network. Averages a couple times a month. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site, part of the Met Art network, features the work of a single artist, Arkisi. (Although some sets and videos are from other artists, the vast majority are from Arkisi). The site started in February 2013, and this is their front page statement of purpose: The artist known simply as Arkisi possesses a keen eye for the feminine form, unmatched technical skills, and the ability to capture the beauty of female sexuality in dazzling digital images. And his considerable talents with a camera combine with a knack for bringing out the inner, usually hidden, sensuality of his subjects. Whether she's shy and demure or bold and uninhibited, Arkisi knows exactly how to present each model for maximum erotic impact. Welcome to the world of Arkisi. Welcome to Eternal Desire.
Updates are usually every-other-day, with 19 updates posted in November and 19 posted in December 2017. There are currently 193 models with sets on the site. I wasnt able to get a count on the total updates on the site, but there are certainly over 700, most of which are photo galleries.
There are 127 videos, almost all of which are solo pieces, but a handful of boy-girl sets. They range from the simple nude girl moving around to masturbation. All are very well done.
One thing Ive wondered about for artists that contribute heavily to a site like Met Art but also have their own site which place gets their best work? Ive checked out a number of sets by Arkisi on Met Art and on Eternal Desire, and they seem very comparable to me, so Id say in this case, the overall quality is about equal.
One neat thing is that Arkisi does read the comments, and will occasionally respond to them, especially to constructive criticism and suggestions. (Ive also seen him do this for his sets on Met Art). Interaction with the site owner is always a plus.
The content here is usually more explicit than on Met Art, but not always. Its still more on the soft core side of things, but can include insertions, spreading, and masturbation.
Some of the models have made a large number of appearances here, such as Mila with 37 sets, Loretta A with 27, Serena Wood with 26, Aislin with 25, Zsannett Tormay with 23, and Nancy A with 34.
The regular price is $29.99 monthly, but the PU discount brings it to $19.99. Annual subscriptions are $99.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
The models are all gorgeous, the photography is very high quality, web site navigation is very good, download and browsing speeds are good. There is a lot to like here. Id definitely recommend giving this site a look. |
|
01-14-18 07:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
6
|
Femjoy
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of the most beautiful women you will find anywhere on planet Earth
Daily updates, with about 9 to 11 total updates each week. Almost every week, one of the updates is a video.
Extremely high quality production values.
Some of the models have A LOT of content Ariel has 73 photo sets and 40 videos, Lorena G has 78 photo sets and 27 videos. Rena has been appearing very frequently recently she now has 26 photo sets and 1 video.
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
12 years worth of content, and a lot of the older stuff is stellar |
| Cons: |
Still a number of technical quirks / glitches. They dont interfere with the main task you are here for looking at pictures/videos and downloading the same. But they make searching, tagging, favoriting, etc. a lot less useful than they should be.
Very little striptease action here in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
Tech support is a joke. |
| Bottom Line: |
Back in the day, Femjoy and Met Art were very close competitors, and I tended to prefer Femjoy. Then at some point Met Art really stepped up their game while Femjoy seemed a little stagnant. The models on Femjoy were always quite attractive, but not spectacular. In the past year or two, this seems to have changed there are a number of models on Femjoy that are stunningly beautiful, and I have not seen many of these models on other sites.
And when I say stunningly beautiful, I mean I am actually stunned. Several times a month there will be a photoset where I just stop and stare at the cover photo before clicking into the photo set. My jaw will quite literally drop on some of these. That doesnt happen very often on most other sites.
The new design of the site (implemented in January 2017) is a huge improvement over the older Femjoy, but it still has many quirks and other issues. (If you prefer the older layout, that is still available at old.femjoy.com). The new version has been up long enough that these quirks should be fixed by now, so it seems likely that there will be slow or no progress on fixing the issues.
For example, if you go to the Models page, there are filter buttons across the top of the page for Sort By, Bra Size, Hair Color, Ethnicity, or Shaved. However, if you click on these buttons in Firefox or IE 11, nothing happens. If you do it in Chrome, The Sort By allows you to choose Recent, Views, or Rating, but the other buttons dont do anything.
You can save Favorites for Photo Sets, Videos, or individual pictures, but not for Models. You can save as many Photo Sets as you want as Favorites, but your Favorites page will only display 20 of them theres no next page to see the other ones.
If you want to change your password, you have to do it through the billing site (ccBill in my case) rather than on the site itself.
Tech support is a joke. If you post a request for help via the FAQ/Support Page, you get no response. (I tried several times). If you try to send feedback, the page just hangs and never sends your feedback in. Luckily my requests were fairly minor, but it would be nice to actually have at least a response, even if its not possible to fix the issue. But when you make it impossible for complaints to ever reach you, you also make it impossible to improve the site. If they are assuming that the lack of complaints reaching their ears indicates all is well, then I guess ignorance really is bliss.
At least the speed is good for browsing, streaming and downloading. Picture and video quality is uniformly excellent.
Monthly memberships go for $29.95, with a PU discount to $149.5 for the first month. Annual memberships are $119.50.
There are 8151 photo galleries, 632 videos, and 577 models appearing on the site. The oldest content dates back to 2005.
If you like looking at outrageously gorgeous women who have no clothes on, this is the site for you. Based on the quality of the photos and the models, this should be ranked as one of the top sites in the world. Unfortunately the annoying technical stuff knocks several points off the score. |
|
08-13-17 07:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
7
|
Girlfriends Films
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
06-11-17 05:01pm (Update History)
Reason: Streaming is working now on older videos too
|
| Pros: |
So help me, I really enjoy the story lines
They take their time
They sure look like real lesbians to me.
New videos are posted once every 3 days. Given the length of the videos thats not a bad schedule.
Over 600 actresses appearing in one or more videos
Some actresses have A LOT of content Prinzess is in 88 videos, India Summer in 77, Elexis Monroe in 152 videos (!), to name a few (although some are just cameos)
Ive been pretty pleased with the talent appearing in their most recent videos hopefully this is a trend that continues
Download speeds are good and streaming speeds are fine too
PU discount price of $14.95 per month is pretty reasonable |
| Cons: |
Anything with a post date of 10/17/2013 or earlier will not stream for me, anything with a listed date after that will stream fine.
Streaming quality is not HD more like 480p or 540P
Really big file sizes for downloads
I like talking and foreplay, but theres too much of it here for my taste. Good thing fast forward works
Videos only no pictures
No model info at all
Logging in requires a captcha
Navigation and site layout could use some work not that easy to find what you are looking for, unless you can be pretty specific. No Favorites, although they do have Playlists, which sort of do the same thing.
The site requires Adobe Flash for any streaming. Given all of Flashs vulnerabilities, Id prefer to not have it installed on my system.
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about. |
| Bottom Line: |
Over 600 models
1294 Videos.
Theres a lot to like about this site, but I dont love it. Update: They seem to have fixed the streaming issue for older videos, so I am bumping their score a little.
More than any other lesbian site Ive visited, their target audience is other lesbians, as opposed to men who like watching women. The guys are certainly welcome, but the group they are most trying to appeal to is women. At least thats the impression I got.
The videos all have some sort of story associated with them. Some of the series include Cheer Squad Sleepover, Women Seeking Women, Mother Daughter Exchange Club, etc. The stories are actually one of the stronger points of the site theyre pretty good (for porn videos).
There are a lot of videos that have an older woman paired with a younger woman. Personally I prefer two younger women together. Given the total number of videos here there are plenty that have two younger women, but the percentage of older-younger combos is surprisingly high.
For example, youd think Cheer Squad Sleepover would imply high school or college cheerleaders, and at least one of the ladies is a cheerleader. But the other is frequently a coach or a stepmom or somebody along those lines. Not that theres anything wrong with that, but it isnt what I was expecting.
Mother Daughter Exchange Club is another example. Of course, nobody should be surprised that one half of each couple involves a mother, who is obviously at least old enough to have a daughter who is a grown woman. But once all the exchanging is done, and the younger set has been introduced to the joys of lesbian love, wouldnt it make sense for the two daughters to get together? Amirite?
I saw another reviewer mention the large file sizes, and hes certainly right about that. I downloaded an older video 480p, 32 minutes long, 1.3 GB. Thats huge. For a 480P film the quality was good certainly comparable to a standard-definition DVD. At least the speed of the download has been fine for me, so Im not complaining about the length of time it took to complete the download given its size, just the massive file size itself. A more recent video (posted 2/19/17) was 1080p, 39:33 long, and took up 1.93 GB. Still I was able to download 5 videos at once, or about 7.5 GB, in about an hour, and was able to stream a video as well at the same time with no loss of video or audio quality Id call that very good.
In your travels, you may have heard that women like talking and foreplay. Well, the women on this site love talking and foreplay it can sometimes take 10 minutes to get to the first kiss. All that talking and foreplay leads to many of their videos having a long playing time (so far the longest one I found was 1:02:16, and its not like Ive looked at even half of the videos). 30 minutes would be a short video on this site. So if you like a long slow buildup this site should be great for you. Of course, eventually they do move on to very enthusiastic Sapphic love making, so you can always skip ahead to the hotter parts if you so desire.
In terms of navigation, heres one of the oddities. Say you are on the main page and not logged in as a member. There is a tab at the top for Categories, which allows you to filter on 68 different criteria knee socks or stepmom for example. After you log on, when you select the same Categories tab, there are only 36 categories to select from.
Another oddity has to do with streaming. As I mentioned in the Cons, I am not able to stream any video which was posted on or before 10/17/2013. But I can stream every trailer for every video (at least for those that have trailers) regardless of how old the video is.
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like youre thinking about it but not sure). Eventually youll get a pop-up chat window (but you have to be on the sign-up page to get the chat) where youll be offered a discount code this is especially valuable if youre looking for a longer term subscription. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $96.40 for annual.
Bottom line there is a lot to like here. In porn, content is king, and the content here is really good. My main complaints have to do with technical issues, which should be easily fixable, but unfortunately they dont seem to be addressing those things. So this is just an almost-great site, not a great one. |
|
04-05-17 07:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
8
|
Girlsway
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good update schedule (recently increased to 5 updates per week)
Good back catalog of stuff too
Many of the shoots produce both videos and photo sets
Excellent picture and video quality
Good speeds for browsing, streaming and downloading
Pretty good model info pages, plus they have some behind-the-scenes videos with short interviews, so thats another way to get to know the ladies.
Very attractive ladies |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Captchas required when logging in
I think some of the stories can get kind of weird |
| Bottom Line: |
Girlsway is basically a network that includes access to several lesbian sites: Mommys Girl, Web Young, Girls Try Anal, Sex Tape Lesbians, and Girlsway Originals.
In early July, they announced that they will now be posting 5 updates per week on the network, by adding a Girlsway Originals scene every Sunday.
Here are the updates for Mommys Girl for June 2017 Videos on the 3, 10, 13, 17, and 24th. Photos on the 3rd (2 sets), 10th (2 sets), 13th (2 sets), 17th, and 24th.
Here are the updates for Web Young for June 2017 Videos on the 4, 9, 18, and 23rd. Photos on the 4, 9th (2 sets), and 18th (2 sets).
Here are the updates for Girlsway Originals for June 2017 Videos on the 1st, 2nd, 5th, 8th, 11th, 12th, 15th, 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 26th, 29th, and 30th. Photos on the 1st (3 sets), 2nd, 5th (2 sets), 8th, 11th, 12th, 15th (2 sets), 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 26th, 29th, and 30th.
Here is the update for Girls Try Anal last update was 9/17/2015
Here is the update for Sex Tape Lesbians last update was 6/22/2015
Theyve recently produced a number of squirting videos, which seems to be a trend in the industry right now, but its not something I personally enjoy.
Photo and video clarity is outstanding. Performance for browsing, streaming and downloading is quite good.
A percentage of the videos in the Girlsway Originals are consumer driven dream pairings where the members vote on which two girls should shoot together, or maybe pick the type of scene they are in. This can be a fun way for members to interact with the promoters of the site. This often results in some fetish oriented stuff you may like it, but its usually not for me.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like youre thinking about it but not sure). Eventually youll get a pop-up chat window where youll be offered a discount code. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $119.40 for annual.
Also, definitely check out the specials they offer on other sites once you have joined Girlsway. I was able to pick up a 1 month membership to Errotica Archives for only $5 a great deal.
There is a lot to like at this site, and it is definitely worth at least a one month subscription to check it out. I ended up getting the annual subscription and I don't regret it. |
|
07-17-17 08:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
9
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
2380 Photo Sets
1030 Models
147 Artists (Photographers)
Oldest sets date to October 2009
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Very regular update schedule (Monday through Friday)
Many beautiful models
High quality photography |
| Cons: |
Only 5 updates a week – daily updates would be nice
No videos at all
Most models have only one or two sets on the site |
| Bottom Line: |
Originally, Goddess Nudes was a spinoff from DOMAI. Here was their mission statement:
“GoddessNudes was founded in 2010 and made by the same guy who founded and runs Domai.com and has been doing so since 1997. That's me! :-) (Eolake Stobblehouse)
I bring the same love, care, good taste, and responsibility to this as has made Domai one of the most beloved and respected nude art sites on the web since 1997, bringing European art sensibility to Nudes. And members' reports tell me I'm succeeding.
GoddessNudes shares the fun and beauty with Domai, only even sexier, for those who have been wanting that. The girls show a bit more. Or you could say that on Domai the sexuality is in the background, here it's in the foreground. (Of course that's not to everybody's taste, which is why it's a separate site.) But fun and beauty are still very big components.”
After the Met Art network acquired DOMAI and Goddess Nudes, the sites were updated to more closely match the style of Met Art, although the original formatting of the site is still available via legacy.goddessnudes.com. Except for reasons of nostalgia, I’d say the Met Art style of formatting is a big improvement.
Since the acquisition, both Goddess Nudes and DOMAI have become more similar to their sister site Erotic Beauty. There is still more sexuality in GN than in DOMAI, in the sense that there are many more open-leg photos on GN than on DOMAI. But close-ups are still uncommon on GN, and any kind of pussy play is quite rare. So DOMAI is the softest of the sites in the Met Art network, and GN is more explicit but still soft core.
The quality of the photography is very high, and the web site performs well and is easy to navigate. It has nice features like favorites and comments. Technical support for any Met Art network site is outstanding - you will rarely have a problem take more than a few hours to fix.
Met Art does offer lifetime memberships on its company owned sites (including Goddess Nudes), running from $500 per site to $800 per site. You do need to join one of the network sites first to be presented this option – it never appears on the general sign-up page. But once you have joined one site you can either upgrade that one to lifetime or pick a different one. As an incentive they also will throw in a one-year membership to any other site in the network.
One other thing – I recently joined one of the sites for a single month, and after completing the purchase, they gave me the chance to purchase a monthly membership to any other network site for a 50% discount – and also the lifetime memberships are available for $400 each (for any site) – so this would be a great way to get a lifetime membership to a site if you are so inclined. The catch is that this discount is available for only 1 hour though. So the plan is, if you want a lifetime to Viv Thomas (for example), get a monthly to any OTHER MetArt site (the cheapest one you can find), but not the one you are trying to get the lifetime membership for. This approach will save you some money, although you won’t get the bonus year on a second site.
Monthly memberships run $29.99, and annual memberships are $99.99. At the moment neither PU nor TBP are offering a discount, and this site isn’t discounted all that often. Although on Black Friday weekend it was available for $9.99. I’d be comfortable paying $15 to $20 per month for this site, but 29.99 seems a little pricey to me. |
|
12-01-18 07:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
10
|
Hegre
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
268 models so a lot of the models have a ton of content
The models range from beautiful to impossibly beautiful
On line since 2002 with regular updates since the opening
Daily Updates
Massage videos
Sometimes actually achieves real art (in the true sense of the word)
Extremely high resolution photography
Browsing and download speeds are very good
The site is well organized and easy to use |
| Cons: |
The attempts at art dont always work for me, so Id say the percentage of shoots that I like is lower than I would expect, especially given how beautiful the model is and how technically adept the photographer is. I cant put my finger on what I dont like, just something isnt clicking. |
| Bottom Line: |
Content is updated daily, and there is a lot of it. In 2017, the new content included 313 photo galleries, 33 regular films, and 18 massage films featuring 17 different models. In 2016, there were 314 galleries, 31 regular films, and 21 massage films featuring 12 different models. Overall there are 4680 galleries totaling 285,015 photos.
Petter Hegre is the photographer for whom the site is named, and he has long been noted as having some of the highest pixel counts on the net and the sharpest photography. Recent photo sets are checking in at 100 megapixels.
One thing that sets this site apart is the relatively small number of models appearing here. Hegre clearly has chosen to focus on building a relationship with a select group of models rather than try photograph as many different women as possible. This means that for the regulars, there is a huge quantity of that one girl which is wonderful if you really like that girl. For example, Dominika C has 83 galleries and 23 films, Emily has 106 galleries and 26 films, and Anna S has 175 galleries and 30 films.
There are a lot of shots in a studio, with a plain white or gray background (probably more than 50% are done this way). But there are also exotic locales, including some shots in front of the Eiffel Tower that are must-see material. There is also a huge variety in the explicitness of the sets. Some models have never opened their legs once for an intimate shot, while for others, you can see a pussy filling the entire 100 Megapixels.
Hegre clearly aims to produce art. For me, a lot of the stuff doesnt work. It seems too stilted. But when it does work, it is amazing. Its kind of like a baseball player that is always trying to hit a homer regardless of the score, the pitch count, the men on base or anything else. You will get a lot of wild swings that do nothing but generate wind. But when he does make contact, it doesnt just clear the outfield fence it goes sailing for miles outside the stadium.
The massage videos are something pretty unique to this site they can be quite lengthy, but are well worth the time.
The site has been running a 50% off special for quite a while. The discounted monthly price of $19.95 is good if fairly standard, but the longer running subscriptions are real bargains. 6 months go for $49.95, 12 months for $75, and lifetime for $399. I dont know how long this discount will remain in effect. You can get the same discount by signing up via PU, which of course is what I recommend.
Given the wide variety of styles, explicitness, the superb technical quality, the frequent updates it is extremely easy to recommend this site. |
|
02-12-18 07:02pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
11
|
Met Art X
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily Updates, either a photo set or video, with about a 3:2 ratio of videos to photos
Excellent technical quality
Wide variety of locales
Gorgeous girls, including many favorites from Met Art
Excellent navigation and web design
Good browsing, streaming, and downloading speeds
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2) |
| Cons: |
Occasional logon problems that have been plaguing the entire Met Art network recently maybe once or twice a month
Has the feeling of girls putting on a show, rather than girls enjoying themselves |
| Bottom Line: |
Solo masturbation photo sets and videos are the raison detre for this site, and they do these very well. The technical implementation of the sets are everything you would expect from a Met Art network site.
The site only started up in March 2016, and there are currently over 330+ videos and 220+ photo sets on the site. They have adhered to a daily update schedule since their inception, and they show no sign of slowing down, so there is plenty of content here.
Maybe its just me, but I did not find this site to be among my favorites. Theres nothing to complain about from a technical or quality aspect. The girls are gorgeous. So why is my reaction kind of meh?
For one thing, from a story telling aspect, theres a lot less that can be done with one person in the video instead of two, so there is a repetitiveness that is inevitable in this kind of site.
I think the other thing that disappointed me is that I hoped for more feeling of intimacy. As I said in the cons above, it has the feeling of girls putting on a show. And yeah, I know, duh, that is exactly what they are doing. But at their other network sites like Viv Thomas and Sex Art, they do achieve that suspension of disbelief where you feel like you are watching a genuine story of some kind.
The videos have a rote aspect to them in most cases. The first part is the girl teasing for the camera to get the guys aroused. Then its time to go masturbate. This one-two formula is quite common.
What I am hoping they can achieve is a feeling of getting closer to the models. For my favorite example, Id offer up Michaela Isizzu in Alone over at Sex Art. Ive watched that video 50 times and it never gets old. So they do have it in them.
Standard membership rates are $29.99 per month and $99.99 per year. The PU discount brings the monthly charge down to 19.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
One other thing I recently joined one of the sites for a single month, and after completing the purchase, they gave me the chance to purchase a monthly membership to any other network site for a 50% discount and also the lifetime memberships are available for $400 each (for any site) so this would be a great way to get a lifetime membership to a site if you are so inclined. The catch is that this discount is available for only 1 hour though. So this can be a good way to get a lifetime membership for a bit of a discount to any network site, or else pick up a monthly or annual discount for some second site. But the time limit on the discount makes it very helpful for you to know ahead of time that it is being offered, so you can think about it a little before hitting the join button.
The Bottom Line is this is a very well executed site. For me, some of the artistry isnt quite there yet. But if you are really into masturbation photos and videos, this site is definitely worth a look. |
|
09-14-17 07:54pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
12
|
Mr. Man
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
This site is the converse of Mr. Skin – but instead of showing nude women, the site features nude men.
If an actror has appeared nude in a movie house movie or broadcast or cable TV, his nude scene is almost certainly going to be here
Video downloads are now offered in h.264 format (MP4)
HTTPS is used
Newer clips available in 720p for download (older may still be lower quality)
LOTS of content
14000+ Celeb Pages
12000+ Title Pages
110000+ Pics
37000+ Clips
540+ Playlists
1040 Original Videos |
| Cons: |
Most videos are not HD, and the ones that are top out at 720p
Most clips include only the parts with nudity, so you lose some of the context and build up in the scene. Adding a couple of minutes to get the complete scene would be nice.
Many of the thousands of scenes they show are extremely short - as in a couple of seconds. For some of the super-short ones, they’ll offer a super-slo-mo instant replay.
Nearly all the photos are screen caps
No biographical information |
| Bottom Line: |
Mr Skin has been around since 1999, Mr Man was spun off more recently (I’m not sure when but I’d guess at least 10 years ago).
As you can probably tell from my User Name, female nudity is more my thing. But I got a chance to get a one month membership for 5 bucks, and curiosity got the better of me, so I joined up.
When you first go to Mr. Man, to sign up, they do require a credit card to be presented. They claim they will not charge the account, it’s only to prove you are over 18, and in my case, to their credit, they did not charge me anything and no transaction appeared on my account.
If you sign up this way and also sign up to receive emails, you will soon get an offer to join the site for $5 for the first month, rebilling at $20 per month after that. I signed up for that deal. Cancelling after the first month was very easy. Note that they have cross-checked sites so clear those, they also provided a one-month free subscription to two additional sites. Cancelling those extra sites is easy too, but make note – you have to cancel each of the three sites individually.
A ”Playlist” is a collection of scenes that fit a theme, such as “Best Blowjobs of the 90s” (this one has 17 scenes) or “Hot Gay Threesomes” (this one has 19 scenes). Body of Work is a pretty regular series where they focus on a single actor.
Their “About Us” statement is a pretty good summary of what they offer
“Mr. Skin- the world’s foremost authority on celebrity nudity- is pleased to present the newest destination for male celebs at their hottest, Mr. Man. Since 1999, Mr. Skin has been the greatest, most dynamic, most all-encompassing warehouse of celebrity nudity on the planet. Now we’re using our below the belt expertise to bring you all your favorite male celebrities nude and exposed.
With meticulously catalogued video clips and pictures of actors who have dared to bare, Mr. Man has no fakes and no scams, only the highest quality content that you can trust. Forget the days of wading through plot and dialogue just to get to the moment when your favorite actor gets nude, Mr. Man is “fast-forwarding to the good parts” so you don’t have to.
From Hollywood heartthrobs to the latest nudecomers, Mr. Man delivers one-of-a-kind celebrity entertainment experience with Mr. Skin’s signature brand of bawdy, boisterous comedy. If you’ve ever seen a gorgeous actor on-screen and wondered if they’ve done a nude scene, Mr. Man has the answer.
It's a dirty job, but someone's got to do it!”
Navigation is quite good, especially if you can recall the actor’s name (first or last) or the name of the movie. The browse function for celebs also offers a lot of choice (some sites might call this advanced search). For example, some of the filters include: has shown penis (2947 actors yes, 11,106 no), hair color, ethnicity, country, and keyword such as athlete, childhood star, singer/musician, etc.
Downloads are fast - helped by the small file sizes due to short scene length. But browsing and streaming are also pretty snappy.
Mr Skin has offered lifetime memberships off and on for years, I got mine a long time ago for $99. Mr Man also offers them occasionally, but the cheapest price I have seen the past couple of months was $139. If you subscribe to their emails, there will be sales where annual memberships go for $48, or one-month for $5. So if you are considering this site, do sign up for emails first. |
|
09-28-24 06:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
13
|
Mr. Skin
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The best celeb oriented site I have ever found
If an actress has appeared nude in a movie house movie or broadcast or cable TV, her nude scene is almost certainly going to be here
Weekly reportage of where to find nudity in newly released movies, TV shows, or DVDs
Occasionally offers lifetime memberships for $99.99 a super deal
Once youve joined, they offer some pretty good discounts to some other sites for example, they offer an annual subscription to Met Art or Sex Art for $72 Ive never seen it less than $99 any place else
Video downloads are now offered in h.264 format (MP4)
Newer clips available in 720p for download (older may still be lower quality) |
| Cons: |
Most videos are not HD, and the ones that are top out at 720p
Most clips include only the parts with nudity so you lose some of the context and build up in the scene. Adding a couple of minutes to get the complete scene would be nice.
Many of the thousands of scenes they show are extremely short as in a couple of seconds. For some of the super-short ones, theyll offer a super-slo-mo instant replay. (But if its the only nip-slip of your favorite actress in existence, youll be glad for this feature).
Nearly all the photos are screen caps
No biographical information
No SSL is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about. |
| Bottom Line: |
Mr Skin has been around for a long time, and may have been one of the first porn sites I ever joined. Its not the kind of site where you will spend hours there but it is nice to check in a few times a week and get a glance at a favorite actress boobies. Or breaking news about an upcoming appearance of said boobies.
No doubt you have some scenes of nude actresses burned in your mind, especially from your youth well you almost certainly will find those scenes here and you can watch them as many times as you want. (Jamie Lee Curtis in Trading Places yum).
Their About Us statement is a pretty good summary of what they offer: MrSkin.com is the world's foremost authority on celebrity nudity, and MrSkin.com is the web's #1 go-to destination for the complete skinny on Hollywood starlets at their hottest. Since 1999, MrSkin.com has grown exponentially, now attracting more than 10 million unique visitors every month who come to experience the site's vast library of sexy celebrity content, including more than 20,000 actress bios, 30,000 movie and TV show reviews and over 200,000 pictures and videos.
Navigation is quite good especially if you can recall the actress name (first or last) or the name of the movie. The browse function for celebs also offers a lot of choice (some sites might call this advanced search). For example, some of the filters include: has shown bush (the most important criterion IMHO), breast size, hair color, ethnicity, along with a count of how many fit that category. So for breast size, we get 4,792 small, 16,248 medium, 4,417 large, 253 X-large.
Downloads are fast helped by the small file sizes due to short scene length. But browsing and streaming are also pretty snappy.
They have been offering lifetime memberships for $99.99 occasionally most recently in December 2016. I have no idea what kind of pattern they have or when to expect them to do so again (if ever), but I would recommend signing up for their emails if you are interested in such an offer. Annual memberships are also offered at $48 per year (when on sale), so definitely look for deals for this site. When not on sale, prices are $15 monthly and $79 annual. The PU discounted price is $9.95 per month not bad. |
|
03-30-17 06:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
14
|
Nubiles Casting
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lengthy videos
The casting director is also a starlet and likes to participate as more than just a camera holder
Gorgeous models
No need to subscribe separately to this site it is one of the bonus sites for Nubiles-porn.com
HTTPS is used (TLS)
Very high quality video |
| Cons: |
Stopped updating in December 2015
Total of 67 videos |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one site I had been considering for quite a while, but never got around to joining. Once I joined Nubiles-porn.com, this was one of the bonus sites. I must say I thoroughly enjoy it.
The whole casting video genre can be formulaic, but it also has a certain appeal. Sometimes, this really is the first time this girl has gotten naked on camera, and that always has a special attraction. Other times, it may not be her first ever appearance, just the first visit with this particular site. And I do think that for most of the ladies appearing (but not all), this is not their first rodeo.
The good thing about this formula is there is no attempt to come up with a goofy story, and nine times out of ten, the dumb story really just gets in the way of what we are all here for. In a casting site, there is no pretense of a story. Just come in, introduce yourself, have some banter with the casting director, strip down, masturbate, move on to the blow job portion of our competition, etc.
I enjoy this particular combination of adding a casting director, who also happens to be a hot babe, who also likes to join in on the fun as she herself is aroused by the cavorting being carried out in front of her. The videos are all well-lit, there isnt a lot of artsy-fartsy camera angles really just horny young things enjoying their sexuality and getting paid to do it. Whats not to like?
Its a pity that they stopped updating a few years ago. Id love it if they start up again. |
|
06-10-18 05:51pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
15
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
• Beautiful girls throughout the site
• Very high quality photography
• Daily updates
• Most of the updates include both a video and photo set
• Massive archive dating back to 1954.
• The older sets date from a time when shaving was not common, so if you enjoy a bush, you can find a lot of it here in the archives.
• Many celebs have appeared in Playboy, and a nice selection of those appear on this site.
• Good Navigation and Browsing Speed
• HTTPS is used – TLS 1.2 |
| Cons: |
• Newer updates include lots of full nudity, but not much of full frontal nudity.
• On the tamer side of the soft core spectrum
• Photo sets are typically only 30 pictures each.
• The archives aren’t as extensive as one might hope – I’d love to see them scan in every picture from all the Newsstand Specials they used to publish. I’d happily pay a premium to a site that included all of that content. |
| Bottom Line: |
Playboy Plus is the successor to some of the previous Playboy sites like the Cyber Club. It includes photos of every Playmate to have appeared in Playboy magazine.
Some celebrities that appeared in the magazine and included on this site include Marilyn Monroe, Kate Moss, Iman, Cindy Crawford, Margot Kidder, Barbara Carrera, and Bo Derek, and many others.
If you don’t upgrade to the VIP, downloads for videos are available in 1080p, 720p, 480p and 360p, at least for the newest content. The newer downloaded photo sets have a standard size of 1920 x 1080 – older sets get progressively lower resolution.
To give you an idea of how many girls are on this site, there are 31 different models with a first name of “Melissa” on the site (spelled exactly that way – not including Melisa or Mellissa). For years this was almost exclusively limited to American models, but more recently they have tried to go international, so a number of your favorites from other European sites may make an appearance here too.
For the standard type of update, there is both a video and photo set from the same shoot. The model usually starts out wearing some type of outfit, she disrobes, and you get to view her naked body. Open leg shots are unusual here, and close-ups down there are almost non-existent. Videos usually run 5 to 7 minutes, and photo sets are usually 30 pictures.
There is an upgrade you can buy once you are a member, which costs $10 per month, and makes you a VIP member. They promise higher resolution photo and video downloads, and also the ability to see sets 3 days before the regular Joes. They have also added a “Girlfriends Channel” which is only available to VIP members – I think these are just sets with two nude women in them instead of one, not lesbian activity.
I have not yet sprung for the VIP upgrade, although I am sure I will at some point, so I can’t say if it’s worth the money or not. But I’ve enjoyed the site for a year without the upgrade, so don’t let the upgrade opportunity prevent you from getting a regular membership.
The regular price is $29.95 per month, which is kind of steep, especially if you spring the extra $10 per month for the VIP. Luckily the PU discount drops the non-VIP to $14.95 per month. Three months goes for $59.95, and the lifetime membership has a regular price of $229.99, but at the moment is $149.99. Around Black Friday they offered the lifetime membership for $99.95, which is the price that I paid a year ago. I would not be surprised if they made a similar offer around New Year’s, so if you are interested, keep your eyes open.
If you’ve ever seen a Playboy magazine you probably have a good idea of the kind of photographs you’ll find here. If you like that sort of thing, you’ll find a huge amount of it here. |
|
12-17-18 05:46pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
16
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There is a lot of content - aound 1800 photo sets, about 210 videos, and about 310 models
The technical quality is superb
The models are gorgeous and not the least bit shy
Navigation is same style as other MetArt sites, which is very good
Technical support for all MetArt sites is excellent
Lots of variety in settings and styles |
| Cons: |
Updates aren't that frequent - 11 updates in December, 11 in November, 12 in October, etc.
Almost all the models are from Eastern Europe with a heavy dose of Russia (I don't mind that at all myself, but some prefer more diversity) |
| Bottom Line: |
RylskyArt is one of the sister sites in the MetArt network. That means it shares the excellent technical support and back end technical staff, which is a very good thing.
Rylsky is one of the higher volume contributers to the MetArt site - he has 1731 photos or videos on that site alone, dating back to 2006. He continues to post content there frequently. He started this site, RylskyArt, in 2012. As far as I can tell, there is no overlap between MetArt and RylskyArt - the smae set does not appear on both sites, although of course many models do appear on both sites.
Some models appear here A LOT, so if you have a favorite from elsewhere, you can really add to your collection here. Some examples include
Jeff Milton - 7 films, 54 photo sets
Nikia - 10 films, 74 photo sets
Zelda - 6 films, 60 photo sets
This site is generally soft core with very little girl-girl or masturbation. The emphasis is on the beauty of the ladies. And with them being this beautiful, what else do you need?
The Backstage photo sets (54 so far) are delightful, and show the playful side of many of the models. Some of my absolute favorite photos can be found in these backstage sets.
Rylsky does read the comments and frequently posts a response - it's nice to have that kind of interaction with the photographer. He even welcomes constructive criticism.
The regular price is $29.99 monthly. Currently the PU discount brings it to $9.99, which is an excellent bargain. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
Bottom line - I highly recommnend this site to anyone that enjoys MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, or similar sites. Especially if you can snag a month at $9.99, I can't imagine how you could be disappointed. If the updates were more frequent I'd give it a higher score - that really is the only knock on the site I can think of. |
|
12-31-19 04:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
17
|
Sex Art
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates – usually 3 videos per week and 4 stand-alone photo sets per week
Videos are accompanied by photos from the same shoot – these are not counted in the 4 separate photo sets I mentioned above
Good mix of girl-girl and boy-girl scenes in the videos. Most of the stand-alone photo sets are solo girls.
Very high quality photography, videography, good browsing and downloading speeds – no technical complaints of any kind.
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Lots of content – 1,343 stand-alone photo galleries, 959 videos (most with accompanying photo sets), 564 models, 50 artists (although Andrej Lupin and Alis Locanta are by far the most frequent contributors)
Browsing speeds and download speeds are quite good
Each video has some sort of story associated with it |
| Cons: |
The newer solo videos have almost entirely moved over to the sister site, MetartX. Older ones that were posted here previously have remained here.
Not much else to complain about. |
| Bottom Line: |
I’ve seen another reviewer use the term “heartcore” for this type of site, and I agree it is a good classification for it. And if that is what you are looking for, then this might be the very best place to find it. There is a story with each video, and while a lot are forgettable, when they do get it right, I think it really adds a lot to the scene.
They've been on line since April 2012, so they've accumulated a significant archive. Videos are all in full HD and photos are all hgih resolution, so no worries about quality as you go back in time. Both the photo sets and the videos are shot with excellent production values.
Not surprisingly, the women here are beautiful, and many are even better than that. What might be surprising, if you have only seen them on Met Art before (and a large percentage have been featured there), is how frisky they can get when the restrictions of plain old nude modeling are removed.
Of course, some of the ladies may be a little awkward in their first appearance, but many of them seem to be totally uninhibited.
The scenes are on the softer side of sex. But the sex is real – there is nothing simulated about it. They do occasionally try something a little harder or more oriented towards S&M or other darker stuff, but it is not a lot, and I expect it to stay that way. The members’ comments tend to be more negative on this kind of content. So don’t go in hoping that things will move to a more hard core focus – they almost certainly will not.
Membership costs are $29.99 monthly (the PU discount drops it to $19.99) and $99.99 yearly. I have seen specials where the monthly cost drops to 14.99 or even 9.99. Also, if you are a member of Mr. Skin, you can get an annual membership for $72 by signing up through that site.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
This is an excellent site that executes its particular place in the porn universe very well. I definitely recommend it. |
|
07-22-18 08:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
18
|
Stunning 18
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Many gorgeous models
A handful of models appear to be exclusive
Had been on a schedule of every-other-day updates (see cons)
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Very high quality photography
MetArt Network support is responsive
Good site layout, search, comments, features, etc.
Good browsing and download speeds |
| Cons: |
Without warning or explanation, only 5 updates posted in April
Since this is from a single photographer, less variety than you would see at a multi-artist site |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the blurb about how the website describes itself:
Antonio Clemens is one of the most innovative, accomplished, and popular contributors of erotic art photography to the MetArt Network. With the creation of Stunning18.com Clemens now has an exclusive showcase for his unique style of meticulously crafted digital erotica. Working with gorgeous young models from around the world, Clemens uses his camera to capture every aspect of their natural beauty. At Stunning 18 you'll find the girls of your wildest dreams in the most beautiful nude art photos you've ever seen.
The site started in January of 2013, so it has a pretty extensive collection of beauties to look at. The vast majority consists of soft core, glamour type photos and videos. There are also a handful of masturbation videos, and also a couple of boy-girl sets. The photographer has been a prolific contributor to Met Art, where there are several hundred of his sets listed. And while this site is part of the Met Art network, the subscription to either site does not grant you access to the other site.
There are 176 Models, 244 Videos, and several hundred photo sets.
Updates are typically every-other-day. For instance, in 2018, in January there were 15 updates, in February 14 updates, and in March 15 updates. But in April there were only 5 updates, and there was no warning or explanation that the schedule was changing. As of the time of this posting on 5/4, the most recent update was on 4/21.
When it was 2 weeks since the last update, I emailed support and this is what Met Art Network Support replied: (there has been one update posted since I received this response, but only one).
My sincere apologies that the Stunning 18 site has not updated on a regular basis. We are sorry but we do not own the site. The updates are dependent upon the photographer to maintain his update schedule. I do expect the updates will resume soon.
If there will be no update in a certain time frame what we can do is to
Cancel your remaining prepaid time and credit it to another site within our network
OR
Cancel the subscription and we can do pro-rated refund.
We are still hoping that there will be updates soon but that will solely depend on the photographer of the site. If you would like to take further actions with the option outlined above, please let us know.
If you need assistance with anything else, please let us know.
The standard price is $29.99 per month, the PU discount takes it to $19.99 per month. Occasionally you will see bigger discounts to $14.99 or even $9.99, but these dont appear very often or last very long. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
If you are a fan of sites like Femjoy or MetArt, you will find a lot to like here, and plenty to occupy yourself for a month or two. But given the suddenly infrequent updates, I would not recommend a longer term membership unless some suitable explanation is given or an extended period of regular updates resumes. So while annual memberships are offered, I would not recommend one at this time. |
|
05-04-18 07:57pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
19
|
Sweetheart Video
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Video updates are usually every three days (except as of 4/17, the last update was 4/3)
Extensive collection of photos in addition to the videos
I really like the BTS features
Streaming works on all the videos
All video downloads are available in various formats, up to 1080p
Includes several bonus sites
Browsing, streaming and downloading speeds are pretty snappy
PU discount price of $14.95 per month is pretty reasonable |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
No model info
Streaming quality is not HD more like 480p or 540P
Searching returns stuff from all the sites on the network there is no good way to search and only get lesbian content, which is what this site that I signed up for (Sweetheart Video) focuses on.
Logging in requires entering a Captcha. This has now switched to a photographic Captcha, which I am finding to be pretty annoying, definitely worse than the text Captcha they used previously |
| Bottom Line: |
As part of the Mile High network, Sweetheart Video also includes access to these other sites: Bi Empire, Doghouse Digital, Cherry Pop, Lesbian Older Younger, Mile High Selection, Reality Junkies, and Sweet Sinner. (Girlfriends Films also appears to be owned by the same outfit, but it is not included in this network of sites and requires a separate subscription).
In this review I will focus only on the content on Sweetheart Video, not the other network sites.
It appears that Sweetheart Video started up in 2011, so they have a pretty extensive collection of stuff on line. There are about 1000 video scenes on line and almost 400 models on the site.
Every video I have looked at (excepting the BTS features) has a run time of between 25 and 35 minutes. Theres usually a couple of minutes of setup story before moving into the love making, so the story line is more ancillary here than on some other sites.
One of the neat things is the BTS (Behind the Scenes) features. They usually include a post-scene interview with the ladies. (Sometimes its a pre-scene video taken in the minivan while theyre driving to the shoot location). Its quite enjoyable to hear them talk about what they liked about the scene and each other. The fact they are both usually buck naked is a plus. Two nude women in full afterglow can be extremely charming.
Searching will return values from all the sites in the network, which is good and bad. Good if you want to see anything a particular model might appear in, bad if youd prefer to focus only on lesbian content.
Heres an example of file download size for a video that runs 25:36. 1080p runs 1.26 GB, 720p runs 922 MB, 540p runs 369 MB.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like youre thinking about it but not sure). Eventually youll get a pop-up chat window where youll be offered a discount code. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $119.40 for annual.
Heres what the update schedule was for March 2017. Videos were posted on the 1st, 4th, 7th, 10th, 13th, 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 28th, 31st. (Also on 4/3 but as of 4/17, no video updates since 4/3). Photos were posted on the 1st (2 sets), 4th (2 sets), 10th (4 sets), 13th (3 sets), 16th (3 sets), 19th (3 sets), 22nd (1 set), 25th (1 set), 28th (2 sets), 31st (2 sets).
Bottom Line This is a good Lesbian site, although if the lack of updates in past 2 weeks is an indication, this might become a non-updating site. Although you should be able to get a daily update if you consider all the sites in the network it just wont be lesbian content in most cases. |
|
04-18-17 04:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
20
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content over 1.7 million photos, over 2,700 videos, over 2,800 models
Big variety of content solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, multi-girl
Some real gems in the archives
Picture and video quality is decent, but not quite as good as the best sites. |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Download speeds are a little sluggish, but not awful
Streaming of videos at higher resolutions really doesnt work at all for me lots of fits and starts
Despite the sites name, few of the models were still in their teens when appearing on here. Its not quite a MILF site but the average age is well above teenager.
Has a captcha when logging in a simple one, so not a big negative in my mind.
Some strange glitches here and there, like no thumbnails being present for a few days.
Somewhat irregular update schedule there were 13 updates in September. |
| Bottom Line: |
There is a lot of good content here, although it is not as easy to find as it could be. The thumbnails are a little on the small side when browsing the sets, so its kind of hard to tell how much you like a girl without going into the actual set.
For me, the archives held more interest than the current stuff, but YMMV. It looks like back in the day this would have been one of my favorite sites, but more recent stuff is just OK. Although they have picked up a few sets of some of the stars you see on other sites, like Nancy A, Gina Gerson, Mila Azul, and Sapphira, and as expected, those are all quite enjoyable.
Picture and video quality is decent, but there are other sites that are better.
I was able to spot a few of my favorite models from years back and enjoyed expanding my collection of those models. The archives date back to 2004, so there is a lot of stuff to look through.
The search function has slightly more than just the basics. You can search on type of action (solo, lesbian, hardcore, amateur or girlfriends), on name, on the first letter of the models name, hair color, and breast size.
The schedule for September had 6 videos on 9/6, 9/12, 9/13, 9/19, 9/25, 9/28. The schedule for September had 7 photos on 9/7, 9/11, 9/14, 9/18, 9/20, 9/21, 9/23.
About the gems I mentioned in the pros section. If you are a collector of Ariel Piper Fawn (she goes by Gabriella on this site) or Eufrat Mai, this site has some of the earliest sets Ive ever seen of these two super stars. Like fresh out of high school. Demi A also has some early sets here.
Billing is PureWebPower.net. I havent used them before. Seems OK so far.
Bottom line, I am glad I signed up for this site, although I wont be a long term member. The gems I found (mentioned above) make it worth it just on that basis alone, and there is plenty of other stuff here to keep you occupied for at least a month. |
|
10-02-17 06:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
21
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
6 updates per week 3 videos and 3 photo sets
Very high quality production values
1,017 Models, 23 Artists, 2.882 Photo Sets, 1,598 Films there is A LOT of content
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
The Behind the Scenes videos give you a good chance to get to know the models better.
PU price of $19.99 is quite reasonable. Annual memberships are $100, and lifetime memberships are available if you already belong to some other Met Art site.
Speeds of browsing, downloading, etc. are quite good. Navigation mirrors that on Met Art, which is excellent. |
| Cons: |
For me, sometimes all the artistry gets in the way. I like simpler stories and less makeup. Although the makeup is rarely garish, its not the more natural look that I prefer.
Many of the photo sets are simply pictures taken from the video session, as opposed to separately conceived sessions. They are not screen caps however.
The Behind the Scenes videos tend to be quite short less than 10 minutes
Except for the Behind the Scenes videos, there is very little model information |
| Bottom Line: |
Viv Thomas was originally founded by its namesake, but Mr. Thomas has since retired in 2014. He does make occasional cameo appearances in some recent videos, but is not the director for any new material that I have seen.
Unlike some sites where the primary content is the photographs while the videos are an add-on, here the focus is on the videos. The photo shoots are frequently (but not always) just photos of the video session. But they are still high quality photos in their own right.
The video collection includes almost everything that was posted to the site since 2009, with a small collection of earlier stuff, some dating back to 1999. So if youre looking for stuff prior to 2009, it will be pretty hit or miss. Older videos are available in 360p. Starting around 2010 the stuff starts to become available in 720p. From 2012 on there is 1080p. Newer stuff is available in 4K, although I am not equipped to take advantage of that myself, so cant comment on how good that is.
The site is mostly lesbian content, with some solo, and occasional boy-girl content up until about 2013. After 2013 it seems to be all female, which is fine by me.
Production values, in terms of clarity, lighting, sound quality, are all state of the art for the time they were filmed. The people behind the cameras here know what they are doing.
I tend to find the story lines to be not that interesting. The love making however, that does hold my attention.
The women are supremely sexy, with many of your favorites from Met Art or Sex Art also appearing here. For some, like Tracy Lindsay (who is amazing), this is her main site, with less frequent appearances elsewhere in the MA network.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
The bottom line is this is an excellent site, and if you are interested in girl-girl photos and videos, you definitely want to consider this site. |
|
07-03-17 09:16pm
Replies (0)
|
|
