Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Bellesa Films
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- They use well known mainstream porn stars (both male and female), so their scenes fulfil the fantasy aspect of watching very good looking people who are good at sex.
- High production quality for their scenes, and video download options to match. I only opt for 720p myself to save hard drive space, but believe you can download up to 3840x2160.
- They advertise as porn aimed at women. By saying this, they seem to be pushing the fact that their scenes depict genuine enjoyment, not over the top fake performances. And any scenes that include a plot seem to be somewhat seriously acted compared to a lot of porn I've watched. I'm no woman, but can appreciate both of those aspects.
- Their scenes filmed under the 'Bellesa House' banner are absolute fire (more on this for my bottom line)
- No download limit (once you have the option to download activated - see cons) |
| Cons: |
- Downloads cost around £15 extra (a quick google search gets you a fairly decent discount on the initial sign up to help soften the blow on this)
- Small collection so far, site has only been updating once a week since 2019, so only 136 scenes at time of writing this review.
- Very little variety in body type of the performers, all on the slim side. A few a bit curvier, but even then it's just your Angela White type. Considering it's advertised as 'porn for women', would be nice if women were better represented in the scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
As briefly touched on under my pros, they film and upload their scenes under 2 main banners - 'Bellesa' and 'Bellesa House'.
The 'Bellesa' scenes are more your standard porn with a small plot before getting down to the business. Nothing at all wrong with these scenes, the action is still great and in keeping with their 'targeted at women' philosophy compared to a lot of mainstream porn I've watched in my opinion.
However, the real pull of this site comes from their 'Bellesa House' scenes. This is where they invite porn stars to choose who they want to have sex with, and let the camera roll while they have the type of sex they want to have, no plot or role play or other distractions. This blows most other mainstream porn out of the window in my opinion, as there's no doubt in these scenes that the orgasms and the enjoyment is real - you can tell they're all in to it and just fully enjoying themselves.
A relatively small collection due to the infancy of the site, and the fact downloads cost extra (I wish I could just know the full price in the first instance!) keeps me from scoring it more highly. Another couple of years worth of updates, and a bit more performer variety, and this could easily have another 10 on top for me. One I'll definitely look to re-join in future. |
|
04-07-21 09:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Desperate Amateurs
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The site appears to use genuine amateurs (hence the name). They're up front regarding the scenes that are featuring a girl already in the business...but 99% of the girls you won't see elsewhere.
- The scenes depict genuine enjoyment. You can tell many of the girls filming are receiving the best fuck they've ever had (particularly scenes featuring male performer called Spades...he goes all out to ensure they women get off as much as possible)
- Large variety of women/body types...something for everyone!
- 2nd time being a member here (first time around a year ago), and never had a problem with download speeds. |
| Cons: |
- 15 gig download limit (re-sets after 12 hours). This includes streaming. Not really a problem for me as I don't download on the highest quality, so can grab plenty of material within the limit. May be an issue for some though.
- Vast majority of scenes are just 1 on 1. I only list as a con as I absolutely love their MFF scenes, so would love to see more! But appreciate being an amateur site, this is tricky to set up. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you get off on seeing amateur girls getting the most amount of pleasure they've likely ever received, I would strongly recommend a subscription to this site. I'm yet to come across anything that comes close to this, and believe what I listed as cons are well worth looking past if you want scenes that depict awesome sex with everyone having a genuinely great time. |
|
02-22-19 12:24am
Replies (1)
|
Review
3
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Seem to be genuine amateur girls. You're unlikely to find them on other sites, unless they start a career in porn after appearing on here.
- Regular updates, great download speeds.
- Male talent does the job of giving them a pounding of a lifetime, no doubts there! |
| Cons: |
- Lack of variety in the girls being used. All typically great looking, thin and toned, early 20's. This will be a huge plus for some, but I'd love to see more average, curvy, bbw, etc. Just my personal preference.
- Navigation is awful due to lack of model names and file names. Difficult to keep track of what you've watched / downloaded already.
- Lack of variety in the scenes. The male performer just goes to town on the girl and pounds away. Some of the girls seem to love this and it makes for a great scene. However, I feel there's plenty of girls who seem really nervous, and would've responded better to the male being gentler with them. Therefore the scenes are very hit and miss in my opinion. |
| Bottom Line: |
For me this would be a near 100 score if my 3 cons were sorted out.
I'd love more variety in the girls. While it's great seeing these undeniably gorgeous girls get the pounding of a life time - seeing more average / nerdy / curvy / even some bbw's in that situation (the types of girls perhaps not used to the attention of the typical jock stud), would make for some amazing scenes in my opinion.
If the sex was more responsive to what the girl enjoyed, I feel they'd also turn far more of the scenes where the girl is clearly nervous / mentally checked out, into something worth watching.
I can certainly recommend a join because there's definitely some gold on here. It's likely going to be a site I'll join myself again in the future to grab the latest updates (if I can work out which ones are the latest on their awful to navigate website!) - but I hope for more variety in the future, or some sort of off shoot where the variety is on offer. |
|
09-06-19 07:27am
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Girls Out West
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
In my opinion - the best professionally produced girl on girl content I've come across. You can tell the actresses are genuinely in to their scenes, and in most cases more than likely are lesbian or bi-sexual in real life, not just putting on a show for the camera. Solo scenes are also great and equally as well done.
The content is filmed and produced by women, which probably helps the performances in the scenes come across as relaxed and genuine (real orgasms etc)
Large variety of body types for the models - ranging from petite to curvy, and borderline BBW in a couple of models. Some may see this is a negative as you may not find all models attractive - but for me it's a selling point. They cast mostly natural looking women too, who aren't afraid to be natural, so you'll find a lot of bush and and natural boobs rather than fake tits and perfectly shaved etc.
Vast amount of content dating back to 2004.
Regular updates - 4/5 a week from what I can tell. |
| Cons: |
Advanced search function is poorly executed. All videos seem to only receive 4 or 5 'key word' tags - so for example, if you wanted to search for all videos involving threesomes, it wouldn't necessarily bring up every video involving a threesome, if 'threesome' wasn't considered a defining tag for that video. The only way to make sure you get all the content that matches your tastes is to literally trawl through it all, which with their vast amount of content, is a tough ask!
Very small collection of boy/girl content compared to girl/girl and solo scenes - and although the boy/girl content is filmed in much the same relaxed manner as their other content, I would say it's overall the weakest content of the 3 options, so would suggest looking elsewhere for that type of content.
The further back you go, the content quality is poor - but I would say everything from 2008 onward is watchable.
Not cheap - 29.50 monthly cost |
| Bottom Line: |
I will start by stressing that this site wont be for everyone who's in to lesbian porn. If you're looking for girl on girl content, pairing the most conventionally attractive porn stars performing together on screen, this site might not be for you. If you're in to more natural/every day looking women, then I think this site will be the one for you, as the performances here can't be beaten. Real pleasure, real orgasms, real passion.
Vast amount of content - site stats suggest 1059 models, 345015 photos, and 4439 videos, and I have no reason to think this isn't correct from what I've seen.
Most of the scenes have a small amount of plot/acting to lead in to the action. I wouldn't say enough to please fans of porn with a plot, but equally it's not so much that it detracts from the scene for people who just like the action to start - a happy medium perhaps!
There's a fair bit of Behind The Scenes and Interview content with the performers too, so you can get to know them a bit, and helps covey how genuine the enjoyment and performances on the site are.
Full HD has been offered since 2013, 4K scenes creeping in around the start of 2017. As I stated in the cons, I think anything post 2008 seems to be perfectly fine to watch, but if you're fussy about your quality, the Full HD and 4K offerings would be worth a months membership to grab.
Although the monthly cost isn't cheap, it does include full access and downloads, so no hidden nasties. I managed to get it at half the advertised price with a quick google search for a discount too!
All in all - I think this is hands down my favourite site for girl/girl content. If they sorted out their tagging system, this would creep up to a 95 for me. For now - a solid 90. |
|
08-05-20 02:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
5
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Quite possibly the most genuine porn in terms of performer enjoyment that I've ever come across.
Great diversity in body types of the performers - something for everyone.
Huge amount of content that can be streamed or downloaded. Archive of video clips totaling 5427 according to the site, dating back to 2006, and all around 5 to 15 minutes long, with HD option offered on videos since 2009.
Frequent updates - appears to be daily while I've been a member.
Community forum that's contributed to by staff from site, the performers, and members. |
| Cons: |
Unable to search videos by niche.
Many of the performer's videos are released as a part 1 and 2. This doesn't take away from the quality of either part as a stand alone video, this site generally ensures at least 1 orgasm happens in each vid - but it looks like there's often a week long gap between both parts being released, even though they were both shot from the same performance. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site makes a point of using genuine amateurs for the most part, and letting them masturbate however they want to capture how they best achieve self orgasm. The resulting content, in my opinion, is 2nd to none in both the female masturbation niche, and in terms of depicting women genuinely having a great time and getting off.
I found the lack of being able to search by niche a little disappointing. They do somewhat make up for this by having a 'List of Lists' section on their forum, where they encourage members and performers to make their own lists of videos with desired niches (i.e. body types, squirting, toys, etc.). I do appreciate why they've gone this route - likely taking the view that all performers add equal value to the site and their vids deserve to be enjoyed rather than categorized, but I personally would've liked the option.
None the less - it's difficult to be too critical of the most genuine porn I've come across. If you're after female masturbation videos, look no further! |
|
04-26-20 08:35am
Replies (2)
|
Review
6
|
Lost Bets Games
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Appears to be a unique niche that not too many other sites cater for. In each update people competing against each other in some sort of game, with the loser (or losing team) suffering a forfeit. The games can sometimes be just simple card games, all the way up to more erotic stuff such as who can make their opponent cum first. The forfeits are equally as varied, ranging from embarrassing (running outside naked or getting spanked in front of people) to ones based more on sexual pleasure, be it masturbating, toys, girl on girl, boy on girl, group, etc...
- Very straightforward web site. By default, the updates are simply listed in order of most recent first, then heading all the way back. Therefore very easy to keep track of what you have or don't have if you're a downloader like me!
- All the scenes seem to use amateur, or certainly lesser known/indie porn stars, and everyone seems to be having a genuinely great time, be it during the games or the forfeits. Not much faking imo. |
| Cons: |
- I was a member last month, so I can't 100% confirm this now, but I don't seem to remember there being a filtering system I could use to search for certain scenes, or at least not one I found useful. For example - as someone who preferred the more sexual forfeits over the ones set up to embarrass the participants, it would be great to be able to filter the scenes by type of forfeit. Instead, I had to click in to each scene and read the description, or in some cases watch some of the scene, before I knew if it would be one I would be interested in or not. |
| Bottom Line: |
I really enjoyed this site. It reminded me a little of another site I stumbled across many years ago called DareRing, which seemed to be set up by some guy who managed to get several groups of strangers together, to play truth or dare style games, with the games progressing in risk/erotic level throughout. Unfortunately DareRing was never updated beyond the first 8 or so updates (I guess it's fairly difficult to get willing strangers to create that type of content!), so it was great to come across a website with a similar vibe, all be it not quite as amateur, but at least with plenty more updates to keep you busy!
I can definitely see myself joining this one again some time in the future to check out the latest updates. |
|
02-25-20 01:42am
Replies (1)
|
Review
7
|
Mom POV
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Site appears to use genuine porn amateurs for the most part, so the vast majority of the milfs on here, you wont see elsewhere. They're also honest when using real porn stars, so no pulling the wool over your eyes here!
- Male star does a good job fucking the girls - particularly in the case of the genuine amateurs on the site, you can tell they seem to be genuinely enjoying...not just going through the motions. So plenty of great scenes if you enjoy seeing women in genuine pleasure / ecstasy.
- Good variety of women - from thin / toned to curvy / voluptuous.
- Good download speeds, never had any issues in this department. And I believe there's no daily limit, so you can collect all the vids you want if that's your thing. |
| Cons: |
- While a lot of the women featured are amateurs to porn, they're not necessarily amateurs to the sex industry (a lot of strippers / escorts / etc) - so don't expect too many girl next door out of her comfort zone type scenes.
- Members section has less info on scenes than the non members section (i.e. no pictures of the scenes), so I quite often flip between the 2 to see if it's scene I want to download.
- All filmed from POV with male stars face hidden - so scenes can all end up quite repetitive, and occasionally limited on positions |
| Bottom Line: |
Great website if you're in to the milf / mature niche, and a chance to see some genuine first timers.
If they spruced up the members section a little to provide more info / pictures of the scenes, and managed to find more girl next door types to film, that would push the score in to the 90s for me.
For now - I'm more than happy to recommend as a site to join every so often to grab the latest vids. |
|
09-29-19 02:43am
Replies (2)
|
Review
8
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- This site appears to use genuine amateur/first time/indie performers - or at the very least does a far better job of presenting the female performers as amateurs than most other sites. Despite the casting aspect being an obvious set up, most scenes appear to depict genuine enjoyment and orgasms as far as I could tell...not too much over performing involved.
- Huge back catalog of content, with newer scenes filmed in 4k, and great download speeds without limit.
- Membership gets you access to Casting Couch HD & Net Girls. The vids on these 2 sites are very similar to Net Video Girls - the only real difference being CCHD has a black male stunt cock. Therefore, not entirely sure why they're marketed as 3 different sites - but the content's quality across the board, so no complaints from me!
- Front facing doggy is a camera angle they use in most scenes, and I think it's now my new favorite! |
| Cons: |
- As seems to be the trend with similar 'amateur casting' or 'girls first porno' sites - they make sure the male performers are kept anonymous through a combo of POV filming, and using camera angles where the male's face is obscured. This limits available sex positions and camera angles - and I'm fairly certain the male performer can't fuck at maximum effort while holding a camera in the case of the POV, therefore the performances aren't as intense as they could be in some scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Female performers on the more amateur end of the porn star scale, appearing to have a genuinely great time in many of the scenes - makes this a must join for me.
If a site like this could just find an able male performer willing to be shown fully on camera, so we could vary the positions being filmed up a bit more, and ensure he's giving the girls maximum pleasure, this would be a near perfect for me. For now....it's pretty close! |
|
10-22-19 08:30am
Replies (8)
|
Review
9
|
Private Society
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Genuine pro-amateur porn. Some of the best pro-am content on the net, and you wont find many in the way of well known stars.
- Top notch performances, if the girls aren't genuinely enjoying themselves in these scenes, they've got me fooled!
- Great variety in body type of models
- Great variety of content for an amateur style site - solo, girl/girl, boy/girl, threesomes/moresomes
- Great download speeds, with no limit on number of downloads, and all included in base membership price. |
| Cons: |
- Lack of information about each scene on front members page (more about this later)
- Scene editing takes away the natural flow in some scenes (position changes cut for example)
- Not particularly diverse ethnicity wise. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've joined this site a couple of times before, and have to admit on previous occasions I haven't grabbed too much content from the site. This is mostly down to the fact the members page that lists all the scenes, simply gives you 1 screencap from the video, and the location it was filmed. On some occasions the screencap they choose might be, for example, a close up of a girls face - however the scene itself ends up being a 6 person orgy! Not very informative!!
This poor members page design is what really lets it down, as the only way of telling if a scene is one you're going to be interested in, is clicking in to each one and reading the description and looking at the pictures there. The site's tagging system leaves a fair bit to be desired too.
Due to the current lockdown situation we all find ourselves in, I've actually had the time to click in to each of the scenes to see if they're worth checking, and I'm in the process of downloading 3/4 of the site, because this is genuinely some of the most amazing content catering towards my tastes that I've found!! All the scenes seem to be depict a lot of genuine enjoyment, with the majority of the ladies quite clearly on their first rodeo, or very new to the industry in any case. It's just a shame that a poorly designed members page didn't reveal all this content to me sooner!
If they put a bit more effort in to the members page, I think this would be close to my favorite site. As it stands, the content alone gets it a 90. |
|
04-09-20 06:37am
Replies (13)
|
Review
10
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Genuine 'amateur' content, generally filmed with girls who although you may find elsewhere, they aren't household names in porn, so more along the lines of indie porn stars etc.
- Reactions of the girls in the film appear to be genuine, whether that be them being quiet / nervous, or having the time of their life.
- Male star who runs the site and appears in most of the videos seems to keep the woman's pleasure at the forefront - plenty of oral and making sure they get off as well as him.
- Downloads included in membership price, and there doesn't appear to be any limit on this.
- Decent video quality for my needs, plenty of download options so I'm sure they would suit most.
- Membership includes access to 2 sister sites, funnily enough one of which is called 'Bring Me Your Sister' haha. I haven't really checked them out but the video styles look similar to those on this site. |
| Cons: |
- The description on the front page of the site gave me the impression there would be loads of scenes with genuine first timers (similar to Desperate Amateurs), but I found the majority of the scenes I've checked out so far seem to be repeat performers.
- I found the scene descriptions themselves a little misleading too. From some of the descriptions you'd think the girls on this site were having the best fuck they'd ever had, which would be highly appealing for me to watch. On actually viewing the scenes, although they're having a good time, I didn't see any 'take your breath away' style action going on. The scenes I've viewed are somewhat stop/start, with a lot of the sex fairly slow/sensual. Might be a plus point for some people - but not what I was expecting to see based on the description.
- I found the downloads to be fairly slow, probably about half the speed of other sites I'm a member of. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was excited to try out this site as it's been on my radar for a while as a fan of amateur content, genuine reactions, and female pleasure.
Although it fits the bill with all 3 of the above, I just found the content a bit on the boring side in most scenes to really recommend this in terms of my own preferences. I've grabbed a handful of scenes to keep, but most likely wont be joining again in the future. |
|
12-29-19 06:47am
Replies (0)
|
Review
11
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- As stated in other reviews, membership here gets you access to Porn Fidelity and Kelly Madison too. I didn't check out too much from these other sites while a member, but they appear to be similar in content style, but using more established porn stars rather than teens.
- Great quality videos that can be streamed or downloaded, and regular updates.
- All scenes seem to depict genuine enjoyment. It probably helps that a lot of the 'teens' featured are likely fairly new to the industry, but you'll find a a lot of genuine pleasure in the scenes here.
- Great website design, one of the easiest porn sites to navigate that I've come across. |
| Cons: |
- For some this will likely be a pro rather than a con, but I found a lot of scenes to be a little over performed. They would do over the top positions (in my opinion anyway) that looked like they'd take far too much effort to try if you were just in bed at home! For some people I'm sure this will make for great viewing, but for me I prefer my sex scenes to be more organic and have the performers just concentrate on pleasuring each other as much as possible. |
| Bottom Line: |
If it wasn't for one thing I listed as a con, this site would easily be in the high 90s score wise. The website is brilliantly designed, the content in terms of video quality is top notch, and the sex performances are A+ - but unfortunately maybe a little too performed for my tastes.
Still - it's definitely a website I'll join again in the future to check out the latest content. And I think for anyone that disagrees with my con - this would instantly be one of your favorite sites. |
|
01-31-20 02:48am
Replies (4)
|
|
