Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : LKLK (0)

Feedback:   All (518)  |   Reviews (162)  |   Comments (40)  |   Replies (316) Other:   Replies Received (290)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 51-75 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 51 Wow Porn (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -If you join one of these 4 sites, you gain access to all 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, and Ultra Films. Technically, you are only a member of one of the 4 sites, but you have access to all 4 sites. -The 4 sites are basically a network. But All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are treated as a group: if you log in to one of the 3 sites, you have access to all 3 sites. You don't have to re-login to switch to one of the other sites to load their videos or photo sets. But Ultra Films is treated as a separate site. To access the contents of Ultra Films, you have to log in to that site separately. And with a different password specific to that site. -The models at Wow Porn are attractive. They range from cute to lovely. They are teens and early 20s. You don't get better than this at any site on the internet. Cons: The last update to the Wow Porn was 5 Oct 2019. The last update to All Fine Girls was 29 Dec 2021. The last update to Wow Girls was 14 Jun 2022, so it's still updating. The last update to Ultra Films was 14 Jun 2022, so it's still updating. That means 2 sites out of the 4 are still updating. The main con for Wow Porn is it's no longer updating. Bottom Line: I guess Covid has really hit the network hard, and they are having financial problems. That's my guess, based on the fact that 2 of the 4 sites have stopped updating. X-Art.com, a competing site, stopped updating in September 2021. The site (and network) is one of the finest hardcore teen sites on the internet. The main reasons: -The models at the site are fucking attractive. Many of the girls have appeared in glamour photo sites like Metart, Femjoy, MPL Studios. -The videos and photosets are clear, crisp images. Fine technical qualities: good lighting, good colors, good sound control, good focus on the models. -Even though the site is not small, navigation is basically easy. -The sex is basically bread-and-butter. I mean that in a good way: it's straight sex, not over the top, not extreme. By straight sex I don't mean it's restricted to boy-girl, what I mean is, it's simple sex, young people enjoying their bodies. No hard or harsh sex, no slapping or spitting. You have solo masturbation (by a female), mutual masturbation (two or more girls), lesbian (girl-girl, more than two girls), boy-girl, 2 boys with one girl, a boy with 1 or more girls. Not much plot, not much romance. It's good, clean fun, no drama, no stupid comedy elements, just young people enjoying sex. I've been a year-long member for several years. The network is one of my favorites. They offer a special discount of $69.95/year throughout the year. Which is a bargain for the amount of high quality content you get. The normal discounted PU price is $89.95/year. 06-18-22  03:17am Replies (0) Review 52 XVideos Red (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -The main reason to join the XVideos Red site is the ability to stream and download the premium videos. With the free version of XVideos, you can't watch the premium videos. You can't download them. -The definition of the videos varies. Many have 240p, 360p, 1080p. Or the highest definition might be 720p Older videos (mainly 8 years back or older) might only have 240p and 360p. Or go up to 720p. Newer videos from the last 3 or 4 years might have a 4K option. -You get a wide range of niches. Covering many different fetishes. -The content is almost all from pay porn sites. There is probably very little exclusive content. Not a normal pro, but the quality of most of the videos is very good. Sometimes you can see what site the video is from, other times, you can't. -Streaming playback is good. You can fast-forward the video, and it won't freeze. -Most videos have lots of tags, to describe the action. No text description of the plot, but a lot of videos have almost no plot, anyway. Cons: -The password for your membership is hidden. On the confirmation email for your membership, they don't list the password. Instead, you get a hot link to login to the member area. I contacted Vendo, the payment processor. They could not give me the password for the account. Instead, they gave me another hot link to login to the member area. I already had that link in my confirmation email. -Most videos you see(from other paysites) are edited versions of the original video. Most videos are around 10 minutes, some are shorter. But many videos have a message: If you want to see the entire video, join the site this video came from. So I think this is a form of cross-advertising. -A lot of people saying that much of a tube site content is pirated. But I think that a lot of the content is taken with permission; otherwise, why all the messages to join the originating site of the video? -The search engine is excellent. Bottom Line: -The amount of hardcore videos is huge. Adult Time is the largest network collection of hardcore videos I've seen, but X Videos Red started as a tube site (it still is a tube site, if you're not paying a membership fee, and then it's called xvideos.com). But most videos at X Videos Red are edited videos, not the original videos. Most videos I've seen at X Videos Red are 10 minutes or less, while the original videos were 20 to 60 minutes or more. However, I've seen some erotic movies at X Videos Red that are the complete movie. These are mainly European skin movies, but it's a chance to see some old European movies from the 70s or 80s for a small membership price, or for free if you aren't a paying member. Note: the search says "Search 10,546,022 videos", but that number is probably inflated. I mean, 10+ million videos? -Not only do you get a ton of models of all kinds (ages, body styles), and the thumbnails can be helpful. I find looking through the videos easier and faster than looking through the videos at Adult Time. Adult Time is a great value for porn, you get a ton of content for a low membership price, but searching the Adult Time content is time-consuming. It's much easier to find pleasing content at X Videos Red. You're getting edited content, but you can join the originating site if you find some videos you really enjoy. -A lot of the videos give the name of the model. Some don't, which is frustrating, if you think the model is really attractive, or the video is really hot. -The membership price is not exactly cheap, but not really expensive, either. $9.99/month, or $7.98/month with a yearly membership. Although the site is huge, you have lots of categories to make searching easier. As well as tags describing each video. -I wonder about the definition of some of the videos. I'm watching a video that is supposed to be 1080p, and the image is not crisp and clear: it seems like the image is slightly fuzzy or out of focus. The details of the video file are 1920x1080, bitrate 2687kbps, so the dimensions should give a clear, crisp image. But the images are slightly out of focus. I'm guessing the fault is with the camera operator, who didn't bother to focus the video. -Videos download with a generic computer-generated file name. You have to add the name of the model (if you know it), plus title of the video, plus the site name (if you know it). -There are a lot of duplicate videos with different file names. -Some videos require a separate subcription. So I guess the thumbnail for the video is an ad, which doesn't hit you at first: you click on the thumbnail, and wonder why the video doesn't load, then realize, you're supposed to join some other site. -No model index. The models have no stats or bios. Bottom Line summary: X Videos Red is the premium version of X Videos. X Videos is the free version. I suggest using the completely free version to see what the basic site looks like. Then, start your free 7-day trial of the X Videos Red membership. That should give you a good idea of whether the site is worth a premium membership. For a low price, you get access to thousands (millions?) of hardcore videos, with downloading privileges. Covering a wide variety of niches. With lots of attractive models. And even though there's a lot of content that won't appeal, it's easier to find the content that does appeal, than at a network like Adult Time, where the navigation is more time consuming. Adult Time is a fine join. X Videos Red is a fine join. There are plenty of fine sites on the internet, that are worth the money. The main limiting factors are the time you have to spend, and the amount of money you can spend. It's easy to overspend on porn, since there's so much quality porn on the internet. But I'm very glad there is so much quality porn available at a low price. 06-14-22  12:06am Replies (0) Review 53 Parody Pass (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network. So you get access to all the New Sensations sites. -Unlimited streaming. Downloads are limited to 300 GB, which is generous. -You can stream videos in 720p and 1080p, with multiple bit rates for each definition. -You can download videos in 720p and 1080p, with multiple bit rates for each definition. -You get a nice, short text description of the plot of the video, plus tags for the video that can be used to search for your sex niches and fetishes. Cons: -Site stopped updating around 10-10-2018. -Site gives me slow download speeds. I have a 200 Mbps connection, but my wireless connection can drop to 9 Mbps. Theoretically, I've read that the minimum speeds required for: SD (480p): 3+ Mbps. HD (720–1080p): 5–13+ Mbps. 4K (UHD, 2160p): 16–25 Mbps. So even 9 Mbps, which my wireless speed can drop to, should be fine for 720p videos. But it doesn't work that way. On my monitor, the stream is not smooth for 720p. And if I try to fast forward the video, the playback will stop completely. The way to get around slow streaming speeds is to download the video, and play the file on your PC. The technical features of some of the videos are top-quality. They have plot and some special effects and good to excellent video, nice sets, nice costumes, etc. Bottom Line: The videos at Parody Pass don't have a single focus or tone: they might try to be serious, or comical, or stupidly funny. In contrast, the stories at Pure Taboo, a site in the Adult Time network, can be interesting and add to the impact of the sex. The Pure Taboo videos are trying to create an artistic, erotic visual experience where the sex is illicit. The Pure Taboo site is probably the finest story-driven porn site I've seen. Candide, a novel by Votaire, published in 1759, was a satire on the Leibniz philosophy of optimism. The novel Candy, by Terry Southern and Mason Hoffenberg, written around 1958, was supposed to be a satire of Candide. Candide, and Candy, are both considered comical, or humorous. I read them years ago, and enjoyed both of them. The humor is not really laugh-out-loud funny. More a quiet humor that, "Oh, I get the idea, and it's nice". The Sex Files #2 is an imitation of The X-Files with sex. My idea of parody movies include Airplane!, Blazing Saddles, Young Frankenstein, Hot Shots!. A movie where you get exaggerated ideas or acting that is supposed to be funny or enjoyable. "The Sex Files #2" is not funny for me. It's not enjoyable. It's a waste of time. On reflection, I realize that by "parody" what they mean is "imitation". The Sex Files #2 is an imitation of The X-Files. It was not meant to be funny, but interesting and enjoyable. Spiced with sex. But at 2 hours runtime, I was bored. Reasons why I don't like the site: I don't appreciate the humor of the videos. I've never followed most of the TV shows that are parodied. So the parodies don't strike a chord in my mind, that makes me laugh or appreciate the points being parodied. Also, some of the parodies are just not funny. The technical qualities of the videos are good to excellent. The acting by the models is OK for porn videos, which sets a low bar for acting. The sets are nice, the filming is done professionally: good focus, good lighting, good sound control, nice colors. I'm giving the site a score of boring 78. That's a new category for boring sex and boring videos. 06-08-22  02:10am Replies (0) Review 54 Disgrace That Bitch (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -A while back, they increased the size and brightness of the thumbnails illustrating the videos on the public page. That makes the videos seem much more appealing, the models look more appealing. -The network and site are teen-oriented. They have mainly Eastern European teens, and most of them are cute or attractive. That is the main value of the site and network, how attractive these models are. -Since the site is so tiny (only 21 videos), navigation is simple but basic. They use the same layout for all the network sites, listing 12 thumbnail per page. The thumbnails are hotlinks to the videos. -Exclusive content. But this doesn't have the value that it used to have. Tube sites feature porn from almost all major and minor hardcore porn sites (edited videos, but not the photosets). -No cross-sell on the rejoin page. I searched the page, but couldn't find a pre-checked cross-sale to some other porn site. Will have to check to see if I overlooked the cross-sale later. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Verotel is the billing agent I used. They have been responsive within a single day, when I emailed them with 2 different problems I had with my membership. Not only fast, but they actually read what my problem was, and responded to it. Many times, a billing agent, or even customer service, will give you a garbled response for help, which is worthless. CONS(START OF): -Sometimes, when you try to login, you get a non-secure login page. Put https in front of the address bar, and your login changes to a secure login page. (This tip came from exotics4me). -Tiny site. Only 21 videos. -Archive site. Site stopped updating in 2014. -The member pages show tiny thumbnails that are low-quality gifs of the video. They really need to enlarge and update the gifs to make the videos seem more attractive, because it degrades the experience of using the site. You're paying for a porn site, you deserve a quality product. Maybe years ago they could have gotten away with cheap-looking Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): product, who's going to pay for it? Either upgrade the site contents, to make it seem attractive, or delete it. However, there are people who seem to enjoy unattractive photos and videos and low-rent porn, so if the owners/operators can attract paying members, I guess they figure that's good enough to sell. -There is a photoset of each video. The photoset is a computer-generated series of screenshots of the video. It's a surprisingly good program that creates the screenshots, since the screenshots are nicely centered on the action. But the quality of the screenshots is just OK. The teen models can be surprisingly attractive. I realize I'm being unrealistic, but many of these models could pose for Metart or Femjoy or any glamor site, and they are instead put into junk porn. -The login details are computer generated. You don't choose your username and password. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): You get access to the entire Dirty Flix network. This site and the network has a lot of attractive teen models from Eastern Europe. The main negatives: Tiny site. Only 21 videos. Archive site. Stopped updating in 2014. The quality of the videos is low-rent. That's the impression. Maybe I'm being overly harsh. The technicals are not poor, they just seem poor. The sound control is lousy, which is the most obvious problem. I'm giving the site a score of 78. Years ago the site had more value, when cheap porn was first being presented on the internet. But for many years now, you can find porn paysites that offer good to excellent quality porn. So this site is a throw-away. Since you paid for the network, you can see if any of the site videos appeal to you. But there are better sites in the network that you have access to. Note: I am giving you my honest opinion of the site. But you are allowed to give comments on the videos. And almost all of the member comments are positively glowing. After thinking it over, I realize I was turned off by the site theme of degrading these lovely teens, not treating them with respect or tenderness. Which is stupid, on my part. If you enjoy watching attractive teens treated like trash, this site has strong value. The treatment is not overly harsh or rough, it's just the attitude that we're hep guys who can treat these cute sluts like the trash they are. Second Note: I'm not a fan of ads, but some of the thumbnails of the models used in the ads for other sites are fucking lovely. If you like teens, you can drool over the images of these lovely teens. 06-06-22  05:13am Replies (0) Review 55 My Family Pies (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: Part of the Nubiles Porn network. The Nubiles Porn network is a fine network where you get professionally shot videos and photosets of good quality. -Streaming and downloads are unlimited. You don't have to pay extra for downloads. -PU has a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring. $99.95/year recurring. But you can find a yearly price of $84/year recurring during holiday specials. The site is currently offering the $84/year special price. -The main billers are CCBill and Epoch. Both are easy to deal with, easy to cancel your sub. -Sign in is easy, if you have cookies enable. Just click the login hot link (since your login details are saved by the computer), and you are logged in. -Navigation is basically simple. Once you get to the main home area, you have a menu of the different sites you have access to. -Site is still updating. There were 4 updates per month from Nov 2021 thru Feb 2022. Then 3 updates per month for Mar and Apr 2022. Two updates in May 2022. Cons: -The main con is the stupid plots, the poor acting of the models. I suggest turning off the sound, and watching the videos in silent mode. Then you can focus on how cute or attractive the models are physically, and ignore the acting and plot. I realize the stupid plots and poor acting are supposed to be cute or funny, but I just think it's stupid. And a waste of attractive models, who could be in much better scenes. -Apart from the stupid plots and poor acting, the other cons are minor. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Ads on every member page. The first page on logging in is a page full of ads, with no video or photoset content. Then you move to the members area with a member content menu for the different sites. Bottom Line: -Site theme is faux incest: sex between step-relations. This is a popular niche that many sites are covering in the last few years. Porn sites are always searching for the next big thing that will draw subscribers, but faux incest is an over-used gimmick that holds little interest for me: Good porn, or watchable porn, needs a few basic factors: -Nice, crisp visuals. To see what the action is like, what the models look like. -Good colors for the skin tones. Plus attractive models. -Decent sets. -Some plot would be nice to add meaning to the sex. Sex between step-relations is mainly between step-brother and step sister. But you can also see step-father and step-daughter. Less common is step-mother and step-son. Or step-mother and step-daughter (lesbian old-young sex). Male gay porn (male-male) is far less common than boy-girl or girl-girl porn. I don't think there is any male gay porn at the MyFamilyPies site. For me, the stupid plots and poor acting get in the way of enjoying the videos. I don't buy the bubble-headed cute teens who are giggling and laughing until they start having sex with each other. I get far more enjoyment watching the videos at the Wow network sites, or the Teen Mega World network, or any video where the models are not supposed to be brainless idiots in attractive bodies. But that's just me. Someone has to be enjoying these videos, or they would stop making them. The site deserves a score of 83. Because the videos are professionally shot. Attractive models. Clear, crisp visuals, good lighting and colors, nice sets. Easy site navigation. Site is still updating. A lot of site features that make using the site easy to stream and download, in your choice of definition. 05-28-22  06:31am Replies (0) Review 56 Wow Girls (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Wow network. You get access to 4 sites when you sign up to any one of these 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films. They often have a special discount of $69.95/year for access to all 4 sites. The PU discounted price is $29.95 for 2 months, recurring. $89.95/year (recurring). -Unlimited streaming and downloads for all 4 sites. -The model selection is outstanding. Late teen and early 20s models from Eastern Europe are among the finest I've seen. This is not a glamour site or network, but the teens themselves have appeared at many teen sites, and some are featured at glam sites like Metart and Femjoy. -Videos from the last few years are available in 720p, 1080p, 2160p(4K), 3132p(6K). For the 4K and 6K definitions you need high-end monitors. -You can select to stream or download parts of a scene, or the entire scene. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -The photosets are high-grade photos. Not quite the same as the photosets at Metart or Femjoy, but just as collectible, considering how attractive these models are, and these photosets, especially the ones of a solo model, are just as good as anything you can find at Metart or Femjoy or any of the glam sites. -Photosets the last few years come in your choice of definition for online viewing or downloads in 1000px, 2000px, 4000px, original. Original definition is 5760px. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor. Each site is a goldmine of attractive young teens. -Technically, when you join, you are only a member of one of the 4 sites, although you have access to all 4 sites. Not sure why they define the membership this way. -You get one login details for 3 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), and a separate login details for the Ultra Films site. Would be simpler to have the same login details for all 4 sites. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Login details are: Username is your email address. Password is assigned random characters. Can't choose your own password, to make it easier to remember. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): I should note that when I write reviews, I'm trying to provide details that I believe are accurate. But I don't bother trying to verify each detail. For example, when I write that a site provides unlimited streaming and downloads, I'm basing that on what I know. But I don't bother to verify each detail with the site. If I read or hear that downloads are limited to 300 GB per day, I will mention that, but since I rarely download anywhere near that limit from a site on a daily or even weekly basis, I would not experience that limit personally. Also, some sites have limits on download managers. I don't bother to use a download manager anymore, but I've read that some sites don't allow download managers. Other sites might limit the way you use a download manager, to one stream. But since I don't use a download manager any more, I don't spend time trying to check download manager rules from a site, or write any download manager details in my reviews. Also, many years ago sites used to use software that only allowed downloaded videos to be played if you had a current membership to the site. But I haven't seen any sites that still use DRM software in years. Bottom line on Wow Girls: Wow Girls is an excellent hardcore teen site. The teen models are stunning. The videos are crisp and clear, with excellent technical qualities: good colors, good lighting, nice sets, nice costumes (I say costumes, but they are nice, regular everyday clothes, or lingerie, or bikinis), good sound control, etc. The photosets are also good to excellent, not glamour shots, but a good photo copy (not screenshots, real photos) of the video. The sex is basically good clean fun: horny teens having sex. Not a lot of buildup to the sex, not much romance, almost no plot to many of the videos. Most teen porn models are not actors, so you don't have to watch them trying to act. Also, at many teen sites, the plots are so stupid you can't enjoy the action. Or the comedy is so stupid you wonder why the writers can't come up with something better. So the Wow Girls site (and the network) is a relief from stupid plots and poor acting. I keep repeating myself, but I think the site (and network) is one of the finest hardcore teen sites. The sex is simple and usually straight-forward. No slapping or spitting on the girls, no unnecessary roughness, no over-the-top calisthenics. Just good clean fun. Solo girl masturbation, girl-girl, more than 2 girls, throw in a boy, throw in two boys, mix and match to get some variety. But the main attraction is how cute these girls are. That, plus the clear visuals, the excellent skin tones, etc. This site and network are an excellent join. Especially if you can find the $69.95/year special that is offered throughout the year. 05-22-22  10:26pm Replies (0) Review 57 The Tabu Tales (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network. Membership in any one site gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for. -Unlimited streaming. -There is a daily download limit of 300GB. Which seems huge to me. Limits are not a pro, normally. But only a purist is going to complain about a daily limit of 300 GB. -Content is exclusive. -You get your choice of multiple definitions for streaming and/or downloading videos. Also, videos will give you multiple bit rates. Seems like over-kill to me, with multiple bit rates, but maybe people with high-end equipment can appreciate the choices. -The photosets to illustrate the video are not simple screenshots of the video, but real photos. And the photosets offer a different version of the video. It's not a copy of the video, but the same scene from a different perspective. Very unusual. Actually, this is the only network I've seen this at. It's like they did the scene in a rehearsal, Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): with the models allowed to improvise. So the photoset is related to the video, but the action/plot varies from the video. -I find some of the interviews interesting. It can give you a hint of what the model is like. CONS(START OF): -Cons are minor. This a good site. Not all the sites are fine, you have some clunkers, but overall, this is a fine network. -You see a video you like, but don't know what site in the network it belongs to. Most videos are watermarked with the "New Sensations" logo, not with the site. And there is no text description that indicates what site the video/photoset belongs to. Not a problem, except if you're trying to write a review for the site the video belong to. The HotWifeXXX videos do have the HOTWIFEXXX.COM logo in their videos. FamilyXXX videos also have that logo in their videos. The Lesbian Experience videos have that logo in their videos. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The number of sites keeps changing. At one time they used to advertise around 20 separate sites, but currently, there are maybe 12 sites, with other videos being lumped into what are called series or DVD. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Tabu Tales focuses on sinful sex. Which is basically meaningless in today's porn: almost all sex is considered taboo, unless you're married and fucking your wife in the missionary position. And even then, if you're filming it, that would be a sin. Or if someone else is watching. Or if one of the partners is having dirty thoughts during sex, that would be sinful. The tabu sex featured at the site is sex between step relatives. -The site and network are excellent. The contents have improved over time, the models are picked to be attractive, the plots usually make sense, the acting is better than at many porn sites. The video quality is good to excellent: nice sets, good focus, good lighting, good sound control. Some of the videos can be really hot. And most of them are enjoyable. I realize personal taste can vary widely. I just went to a Mexican restaurant yesterday, my neighbors told me (husband, wife, older daughter) the restaurant was great. I ate there, thought the restaurant was shit, the pinto beans were hard, the cheese enchiladas were lousy-a tortilla wrapped around some melted cheese that was cold. I realize that opinions can vary widely, but I was really disappointed with the restaurant. But I enjoy the New Sensations network. I've found some videos that I really enjoy. And found plenty of others that are worth watching. The New Sensations models are attractive. There are other sites with models that are even more attractive, but the New Sensations models are fine. And some of their videos are hot. Also, the nice-sized thumbnails used to illustrate the individual videos are bright and showcase the models attractively. Some of the thumbnails are jpegs, that if you hover your mouse over the thumbnail, it gives you a brief clip of the model in action. I enjoy looking at some of these models. Many of the models are attractive, but some just seem to have extra appeal. Again, personal tastes vary, but some models are just fucking appealing. You need a plot that fits your tastes, a model that you find really attractive, but the combination makes a video and site worth joining. Bottom line: Tabu Tales is not the best site in the New Sensations network. The premise of the plots are not as strong as in some sites, the level of attractiveness of the models is not as high. But since you paid for your membership, scan the site to see which videos appeal to you. The site stopped updating years ago. Which was a good thing, because that allowed them to focus on providing content to other network sites. The network offers straight and lesbian sex, some interracial sex, gangbang porn, taboo porn, and other niches. Some early content is only available in SD definition. And early videos have a photoset made of screencaps instead of real photos. But that shows the network has been improving steadily over the years, and has been offering 4K format over the last few years. Every so often New Sensations offers a $60/year price, which is a substantial discount from the PU discounted price of $95.40/year or $119.95/year. The monthly, multi-month, and yearly membership options come with full streaming and downloading privileges. I believe the 3 day trial for $4.95 might be a limited trial. I'm not sure, since I've never used it. I always went for a yearly membership for $60/year. 05-15-22  04:26am Replies (0) Review 58 Step Siblings Caught (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network. A fine teen hardcore network with first-class production videos and easy navigation. -A lot of cute young teen and early-20s models. You find young cuties at many teen sites on the internet, but it's good to know that Covid has not stopped these attractive young girls from making good to fine content for us porn users -The network has around 19 sites. Out of 19 sites, 7 are still updating. The Step Siblings Caught site has an irregular update rate, anywhere from 1 to 4 updates per month. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. Don't have to pay extra for downloads; many other sites are now charging extra for downloads. -The photosets of the videos are worth collecting. These are real photos, not screencaps, and the photos have attractive models, good colors and lighting, nice sets, good focus. -The player to stream/play the photosets online is fast and and easy to use. Cons: -Lots of ads. First page you see when logging in is a page full of ads. Then you get ads on every member page. Ads are part of almost any porn site, but since you paid for a membership, sometimes you get tired of ads and want to see what you paid for. Did I really pay to see ads, or am I just too immature to realize ads are part of life and to get past that? -As a suggestion, if you are going to list lots of sites I might join, why not show the membership prices? I'm not going to click on the site name, just to find what the membership price is: if the price is really low, show it to me. Otherwise, stop wasting my time. Bottom Line: -Site theme is faux incest: sex between step relatives. This is one of the more popular niches in the last few years. It's supposed to be more thrilling or more perverted if you think the people having sex are related by marriage. I guess I'm getting jaded by watching porn, but the idea of faux incest doesn't rock my boat. -The vibe of the videos and photosets is teens having sexy fun. It's straight hardcore, no romance, not much petting before the sex, just horny kids fucking. The girls are usually the aggressors, the stunt cocks are teen boys (or early 20s) who are playing shy or backward who are pulled into pleasing the girls. So there's supposed to be an element of comedy in the videos, which gets old fast. The main pluses of the site (and the network) are: -The level of attractiveness of the models is uniformly high. A lot of cute young girls at the site. And the older female models are mainly attractive as well. -The technical quality of the videos is fine to excellent: clear, crisp visuals, good lighting and sound control, nice sets, nice costumes (the costumes are mainly street clothes, but regular street clothes, not cheap clothes). So it's a quality product. The main negatives of the site (and the network) are: -I wish they would get rid of the sophomoric attempts at humor and go for a more realistic vibe, or one where the girls aren't air-head nymphos seducing backward stunt cocks. But the cute models keep me coming back for more. Giving the site a score of 88. Mainly because of the cute models. But the videos, apart from the stupid plots, are worth watching for the visuals. And you get network access to a boatload of fine teen models. 05-15-22  04:04am Replies (0) Review 59 Devils Film (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Devils Film used to be part of a large network of porn sites. But for the last few years, it was merged into Adult Time, an even bigger network of porn sites. Adult Time has over 55,000 hardcore videos, probably over 50,000 photosets based on those videos. So you get full access to the Adult Time network with a Devils Film membership, and vice versa. -Devils Film is for hardcore porn aficionados. You will find anal, threesomes, gangbang, and with other sites that are/were part of the Devils Film network, you can explore lots of other sex niches (trans, faux incest, inter-racial, etc.). -What's amazing is that the site is still updating. You currently have 6630 videos that are part of the Devils Film site/channel. And more are coming. You could easily spend months watching just the videos at this one channel alone, not counting the 55,000+ other hardcore videos at Adult Time. That is an embarrassment of riches. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -As part of the Adult Time network, the site layout gives you the premium features of most porn sites: multiple definitions for streaming. If your membership inludes downloads, you get multiple definitions for downloads. -You can watch the full video, or a trailer for the video. -Streaming and downloads definition for most videos are 160p through 1080p. -There is a nice, short text summary of the video. Plus plenty of tags that describe the action. CONS(START OF): -The site is pure hardcore. Sometimes you want a break from hardcore and want some softcore. Or something slightly more artistic. -Most PU members want download privileges. Download privileges are normally not included with a monthly membership. Exotics4me writes that if you contact customer service, they might offer you downloading privileges with a monthly sub, and with a discounted rate. -Because the site and network has such a huge amount of content, navigation can be difficult. Bottom Line: CONS-CONTINUED: -Devils Film never concentrated on finding attractive models. If all you want in a sex video is bodies slapping together, without requiring the models to be good looking, the site gives you plenty of content in many different niches. However, I like the models to be cute or pretty, which limits the videos I enjoy at the site. -4K videos are in the minority. BOTTOM LINE-START OF: -Maybe it's just me, but I find watching these videos to be a low-rent experience. Even when the videos are professionally shot with good to excellent technical qualities: nice sets, good focus, good lighting, good sound control, etc., watching these videos makes me feel I'm watching a crude porn video: unattractive stunt cocks, unattractive models, un-appealing sex, why-the-fuck-am-I wasting-my-time watching shit porn. It's not shit porn, it just seems like shit porn to me. This stuff is garbage, that I don't want to watch. Give me something prettier. Or more interesting. Or whatever. But not this shit. I can find plenty to watch at Rocco Siffredi. Or Teen Mega World. Or the Wow sites. Or Let's Doe It or other networks. But most of the content at Devils Film is, for me, junk. It's psychology. Even when I find a video that I should enjoy, because the models are cute, the plot is OK to good, I don't enjoy it, because I'm turned off by the junk videos I've just looked at prior to finding the good video. For example: "Seducing My Straight White Best Friend #02", with Coco Lovelock & Michelle Anderson, posted 2022-02-13. Coco Lovelock is a cute white girl around 22 years old. Michelle Anderson is a cute black girl around 20 years old. They are playing students in an empty classroom, who have sex with each other. Nice lesbian scene, that could be placed in many lesbian sites. Do I enjoy watching it? No. Why? I'm so turned off by the shit I've already seen at Devils Film, I can't enjoy watching this video, which should be enjoyable, but I can't enjoy it. That's me. If I have to watch or slog through too many videos that I don't enjoy, I won't find pleasure even when I come across a video that I should normally like. So I'm giving Devils Film a score of 85. It's part of Adult Time, which normally would give a site a score in the 90s, because of access to the Adult Time network. But I really dislike most of the content at Devils Film. It's not to my taste. Though some PU members might enjoy the content, and think the site is a fine addition to the Adult Time network. 05-03-22  01:13pm Replies (0) Review 60 NS Romance (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -This is one of the New Sensations sites. Membership in any one of the New Sensations sites gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for. -I like the selection of models at the site and network. Obviously I don't like all of them, but there are some that are really appealing. Personal preferences play a large part in what each person enjoys, but the models and some of the stories are very enjoyable. -The videos (and the photosets) are professionally shot. Nice sets, good lighting and focus, good colors, good sound control. -Content is exclusive. -The site (and network) features interviews with the models. Many people think the interviews are boring and a waste of space, but I like to listen to them, especially the interviews with models that I like: it gives you added information about the models. It can also give you an insight in how these people think, which is rare: mostly, you get canned speeches that don't tell you much of anything Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): except how well they can speak into a camera. -A lot of the models at the site (and network) are early into their porn career. Actually, many models seem to have a porn career of 3 to 4 years or less. So maybe I'm stating the obvious. -Years ago there was a sameness to many of the videos. But the quality and variety of the plots and other technical factors have improved over time, and I think the network is more of a bargain than it used to be, because the content is more appealing. Especially if you can join with a discounted price during a holiday special. CONS(START OF): -The main con is the site is no longer updating. A shame, because this is one of the better sites in the network. I like the idea of romance between two people, it gives meaning to the sex. Especially if it's done well. And the site (and most of the network) does use writers that can create simple plots that add value to the videos. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Many of the models can act well enough that the videos aren't ridiculous or cringe-worthy. -Other than the main con that there are no updates, I think most other complaints are minor. -There is a daily download limit of 300 GB. Which is trivial, for most people. -Videos have a watermark which shows "New Sensations", which is the network, not the site name. So the only way to know a video belongs to the site is when you click on the Romance hot link and search through those videos. You can't tell from the video itself that a video belongs to the site. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): I think the content at the New Sensations network has improved over the years. It's much more appealing. The stories or plots are more believable than the plots at many porn sites, which is refreshing. The acting by the models is more believable, partly based on better plots, but also by the models trying to act better instead of trying to act stupid. The New Sensations Romance site stopped updating years ago. On 2018-10-13 they posted the "Welcome to my World" video starring Kenna James, which was the last update. Whether you call Romance a site or a series at the New Sensations network can be elastic. On some pages at New Sensations, it's listed as a site. On some other pages at New Sensations, it's listed as a series. The Romance videos are actually taken from DVDs, that the New Sensations owner/operator/studio/whatever-you-call-it people put out. The site and network are user-friendly. You get a short text description of the video, that is accurate and tells you what the video is about. Good tags that help you if you like searching a site or network. You get multiples choices in streaming and downloads for definition and bit rate. You get a listing of the porn stars in the video/photoset. You get good quality (or what I consider high quality) videos of attractive young models who put on a good sex show. The sex is basically bread-and-butter, not over-the-top calisthenics. Prime young flesh on view, nice scripts with a bit of romance and meaning, fine visuals, nice sets, gives you a quality product. For a low membership price, I think the site (and network) is a bargain if you can join for $60/year during a holiday special. The regular price, with a PU discount, is $95.40/year. 04-30-22  03:26am Replies (0) Review 61 Southern Sins (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Prime network. A fine, teen-oriented network. -They change the home page of the Adult Prime member page fairly often, so you get a current picture of the updates and live shows and whatever else is happening at the network. -Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. There is a captcha, but it's very easy to read. -Videos are offered in 540p, 720p, 1080p. No 4K option. -You get a photoset for most videos. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -The content is exclusive. Cons: -Tiny site. Only 46 videos. 32 photosets. -They were updating with 2 or 3 new videos per month. But the last updates were in November 2021. So this might be an archive site. -Videos filmed in Australia. The Aussie accents are intriguing at first, but I would prefer American English, so I could understand the dialog easier. -The females can have under-arm hair. The females can have pubic hair. Hair doesn't bother me. But it's different from the shaven look of most porn models. Bottom Line: The videos are a change of pace from the normal videos shown at many porn sites. The videos are seem more amateurish. The colors of the videos are nowhere near as life-life as the videos at the Diesel network, or the Club Sweethearts or Digital Desire sites. The idea of the site is supposed to be Aussie girls having kinky fun. But that's a stretch. Maybe I'm too jaded, but to me, watching these videos is like watching home made videos of regular-looking people with a bit of sex thrown in. The sex is not kinky. In one video, you watch 3 young women in a cabin near some woods, they go out and hang up some laundry, they take off their clothes, they talk, kiss, touch each other, lick each other's pussies. This is the Southern Sins site version of sin: minimal lesbian sex between 3 women. Give me the videos at the Wow sites, which seem like masterpieces of artistic vision in comparison: Not only are the girls at the Wow sites absolutely gorgeous compared to the models at Southern Sins, but the videos at the Wow sites have vivid colors for the flesh tones of the models, the clarity and crispness of the images at the Wow sites is far superior. It's just a completely different type of offering. Southern Sins is offering you home-style porn: the men and women in their videos are plain-style people. The quality of the videos is what you would get filming your own family at your house or at a park or on the street with amateur cameras (minus the sex, obviously). The site is worth checking out since it's included in the Adult Prime network. Think of the site as a slice of life site: you are watching home-style, amateur videos (and photosets) of mild sex. The sin is in the idea of sex. If you see two people kissing, that is sinful. Especially if they are both women. And if they have plastic ties or handcuffs on the women, Oh, God, that is perverted sex. No matter how mild the sex might be. Or, my gosh, what if a man and woman have sex on a blind date: how perverted and sinful. I'm giving the site a score of 75. I really enjoy American porn more. Or European porn. That has a more glossy feel, better scripts, more attractive models. Southern Sins gives you home-made, simple porn that is very bland. 04-29-22  05:50am Replies (0) Review 62 Nubiles Casting (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -One of the better sites in the Nubiles Porn network. The idea is simple yet effective: easily filmed, without a lot of acting needed by the models, which is a good thing, since most models have limited acting ability. You are watching a model who is trying to enter porn. The casting director is another young model, who has some experience in porn, and she talks/directs the newbie through the shoot. -Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. -Most of the models are cute. Most porn sites focusing on teen models have a catalog of attractive young teens, so this site is just one more. But I do enjoy looking at fine young teens. -Joining any site in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Content is exclusive. Cons: -The major con is the site stopped updating in 2015. So you only get 67 videos at the site. -Do not join Nubiles-Casting.com directly. The PU link gives you a discounted price of: $14.98/month $99.95/year Or you can wait for a holiday special, when the prices might be even lower. (Joining Nubiles-Casting.com or Nubiles Porn.com directly without using the PU link gives you much higher prices: $29.32/month $199.00/year -A lot of ads for other porn sites. The first page you see when logging in is a full page of ads for other porn sites. Then, when you get to the member pages, you have ads for other porn sites on every member page. Ads are now standard for porn sites. But since you already paid for your membership, you wish they didn't push the ads so much. Most porn sites are having financial problems, starting with the financial meltdown in 2008, and now the covid epidemic has lasted for years. And the competition from tube sites and piracy are also major problems. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): So I guess porn sites are scrambling for every penny they can get, and we, as consumers, have to live with it. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Videos are offered in 270p through 1080p. No 4K option offered. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The main con is that the site stopped updating in 2015. I think the network owners aren't thinking straight, or perhaps they don't care about the quality of the network. Or maybe they enjoy the stupid plots and stupid dialog featured at many of their sites: maybe they even think the stupid plots and poor acting are cute. Maybe they don't care, as long as they have content that will draw in subscribers. Whatever. The Nubiles Casting site is one of the better sites in the network, because the acting is not cringe-worthy, and the plot makes sense. Simple plot: A girl who is new to porn (and most of these models actually are fairly new to porn at the time of filming) is trying out for a porn video. Another model, who has some porn experience, is the casting director, who talks the newbie into removing her clothes. Then the female casting director might make a move on the newbie, for some lesbian sex. Or she might bring the stunt cock into the room, and the stunt cock and the newbie have sex. With the casting director possibly joining in. There can be slight variations on this simple theme, with two or more female models in the video (in addition to the female casting director). Sounds simple, but it's easily filmed, without a lot of stupid dialogue or unconvincing acting needed, which makes watching these videos so much easier. I shouldn't complain so much about stupid plots and stupid dialogue, after years of watching these videos. But it takes away, or destroys, any pleasure in watching many of these videos. What makes these videos enjoyable? The models are uniformly attractive. These are girls who are at or near the start of their porn career. Very little tattoos, not a lot of heavy makeup. These girls are the girl-next-door type, not porn stars. Slender bodies, almost no boob jobs. Simple plots, minimal dialogue needed. Simple sets: a bedroom, a couch, simple, not expensive, but not overly cheap. Costumes are simple street clothes: many of the models wear cut-off shorts to showcase their legs and ass. The vibe is: you are there, watching a casting call. Of an attractive young girl. Who gets naked, and has sex, with a stunt cock, maybe with the female casting director, maybe with another model who joins in. This is such a welcome change from the stupid plots, stupid dialogue, lousy acting from the other sites in the network. Also, it amazes me, how, year after year, all these cute young girls go into porn. Most don't last very long. So you have to enjoy them while they are still around. And hope that your favorite models will last. How can they improve the site? Simple. Stop updating sites that feature stupid plots, poor dialogue, poor acting, and start updating this site, with attractive models. There was no reason to stop updating this site. The videos were inexpensive to make. No reason at all, except for a lack of appreciation of what they were creating. They stopped making good porn, and concentrated on making shit porn. However, they are smart enough to use attractive young girls for their models. So they aren't completely stupid. 04-25-22  09:42am Replies (0) Review 63 Lez Cuties (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Lez Cuties is an educational site. It teaches you that no matter how cute a girl might be, no matter how young they are, you have to determine if they have lez tendencies before you get involved with them. Otherwise, if they turn out to be lezzies, you can get your heart broken. However, if you're broad-minded, and don't mind sharing, you can get two or more cuties in your bed for the price of one. (Ha-ha. Get the joke: broad-minded.) -The site title is appropriate. Most of the models are young and attractive: Lizzi Vogue (aka Lizi Vogue, Liz Vogue, Vika K, Pola, Kristin A, Wendy), Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, Geisha Kyd, etc. The list goes on and on. You need a porn site encyclopedia to keep track of the names these porn stars are known by, as well as the sites they appear at. -As a site included in Adult Time, you get all the bells and whistles the network offers: Multiple definitions for streaming. Multiple definitions for downloads. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Read a review about the Adult Time network to get a full list of the many advantages of an Adult Time membership. -The technical features of the videos are first rate: crystal clear videos, excellent lighting, good colors and sound control, expensive sets. -Although many or most of the models are European, the videos are mainly in English. -The site updates with 2 new videos per month. And if you want more lez content, there are plenty more lez sites in the Adult Time network, as well as lez content mixed in with the straight content in non-lez sites. -Videos have a short text description of the plot. And there are tags that also define the video action. So you get a good idea of the plot (what little there is of a plot) from the text description and the tags. CONS(START OF): -The cons are minor. Adult Time is probably the best bargain in paid porn today. You get a wide variety of niches, with over 55,000 hardcore videos of good quality, for a low price. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The easiest way to get downloading privileges is with a one-year membership. The normal monthly membership is streaming only. But exotics4me has written that if you contact customer service, they might offer you a monthly membership with streaming and downloading privileges, at a reduced price. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Navigation could be improved. The network has so much content, it's hard to get a listing of the content for each site. You need time and patience to find the content that fits your tastes. -It's easy to get distracted while searching the content. Too many good looking models, too many sites that might appeal to you, get in the way of searching any one site. Maybe I'm weak minded, but I get distracted easily. -The model page for a model has links to her videos at the network, but no bio or other information on the model. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Lez Cuties is part of 21 Naturals, which is part of 21 Sextury, which is part of Adult Time. So you get access to the entire Adult Time network. The site title is apt: the models are almost all young, cute girls. They do throw in some older models for variety of age and plot. But the older models are also attractive. The site has 518 videos. "Till Next Time", a Lez Cuties video posted 2022-03-24, features Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, and Geisha Kyd. Geisha Kyd has a boyfriend. You can tell right off the bat that Alexa Flexy and Bonnie Dolce are dyed-in-the-wool lesbians, because they are kissing each other a lot. When Geisha Kyd drops by their house, bringing a new boyfriend, Alexa and Bonnie make them welcome. However, Geisha and Bonnie start kissing, right in front of the boyfriend, who smiles with embarrasment. Then Geisha says to her boyfriend that she's sorry, but it will have to be another time. And the boyfriend leaves. This is why I said that before you get involved with a lez, make sure she will invite you to participate in any parties with her girlfriends. The guy is probably forced to masturbate by himself while the three girls are having sex. Alexa Flexy, Bonnie Dolce, and Geisha Kyd are 3 really cute young girls. And they're really into each other. Bonnie doesn't want the boyfriend joining in, it's strictly girly sex today. The boyfriend could have made the sex more interesting, if he was the take-charge type of guy. But he's a wimp, who disappears when Geisha tells him to leave. And the 3 girls start making out. So lots of kissing, caressing, pussy licking, finger-fucking, Good, clean fun. The three models are absolutely adorable. Very pretty faces, great bodies. And the sex is slow, gentle, the noises the models make are soft, not over-the-top, which is more realistic than fake screaming because someone is touching their breast or pussy. So this is a fine to very fine scene. Any quibbles about the video? Alexa Flexy has medium sized breasts. But they are so firm, even when they are being kissed, they don't move naturally. They're probably implants. I mean breast tissue is mainly fat, not muscle, so medium or large breasts, if natural, will jiggle. Flexy's breasts don't jiggle: they are not overly large, and her breasts are nice-looking, but I'm not a fan of breast implants. That's my personal preference. Many people enjoy medium or large breasts, and don't mind implants. However, I discovered why they didn't need Geisha's boyfriend. During the sex, Alexa grabs a large plastic dildo, and uses it on Bonny's pussy. The boyfriend didn't have a cock as large as the dildo. The dildo might be plastic, instead of warm flesh, but these lezzies know how to use a dildo better than the wimpy boyfriend could use his cock. And then Geisha uses a tiny vibrator to use on Bonny while Bonny's pussy is getting fucked by Alexa. So the moans and groans get louder. If you have an alpha male, like James Deen, who could take charge and use these women, then the women would probably have gone along with Deen. But the boyfriend was, apparently, a mild guy who put up no fuss when he was dismissed. The moral of the story is: if you find your girlfriend is a carpet muncher, make sure she knows you're the boss man, and that you will be included in any flings she might have. I'm giving the site a score of 90. Access to the Adult Time network makes joining this site a winning proposition. Adult Time has a huge number of really fine videos. The problem is finding the ones that will appeal to you. So you need time and patience to slog through the content, but there are, in addition to the good videos, some really fine videos that will make you glad you joined the network. And the Lez Cuties site has some very attractive models. 04-22-22  11:56am Replies (0) Review 64 Jim Slip (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Prime network. A teen-oriented network that has lots of really cute young teens. -Watch anywhere. Watch anytime. You can watch on your desktop, tablet, cell phone, TV, Smart TV. -Adult Prime has a live chat channel with lots of models. Also, there is a free live sex show given once a week, I think. Mary Rock and Jason are the stars. -Jim Slip's wife, Lara, is an excellent camera-woman. Her videos are excellent, even when filming outdoors. Side note: I recently reviewed a site, Tricky Agent, where the camera-work was so shit the videos were un-watchable. It's a pleasure to watch quality videos that have correct focus and aren't so herky-jerky. -I enjoy the public page of adult prime. It features a large-sized photo of a scene right out of a museum, except it's a porno scene, for sinfulxxx.com. But the vibe is that the network will give you content that's prime quality. Cons: -I think any cons are minor. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Prices are in Euros. So you might pay a conversion fee. -Captcha required for login. But captcha is easy to solve. -Some videos only seem to have a 720p definition. For both streaming and downloading. -People who hold a grudge against England for the Revolutionary War might be offended (joke). We won that war. Bottom Line: The Jim Slip site features Jim Slip having sex with young cuties. The punchline is that the scenes are filmed by Jim Slip's wife. They have an open relationship, where Jim is free (and encouraged) to fuck young girls. And his wife enjoys getting fucked by other men. The Jim Slip site been around since 2002. So the site features old-young. Old is Jim, young is the cuties he gets to fuck. There is added flavor, since Jim is British. That adds an element of class to the sex. The Jim Slip site is a nice change from your ordinary porn site. It's reality porn, but a more real porn than most reality porn sites. It features a old man who loves going out and fucking cute young girls. You watch a video of Jim Slip talking with a girl, bringing her to a hotel room, giving her directions of what to do, the vibe is very different from Pierre Woodman. Woodman enjoys hurting his models, forcing them into intense sex which he tries to portray as fun for both parties. So if Woodman can shove his prick up the girl's ass, or pee on her, it's all good clean fun, as far as he's concerned. Woodman also enjoys slapping a girl and ramming his cock down a girl's throat, to make her gag. Whether the girl knew what she was getting into before it happens is doubtful. Jim Slip is a more relaxed kind of sex. He treats his models with respect. No rough sex. This is a large site. 765 videos. The videos are shot in different European locations. London, and different European countries, such as Hungary, The models are not all British. But they mainly speak English, often with a cute accent. Jim Slip has an informal, easy manner. And Jim Slip is a real person. What I mean is, even though he's in his 40's or 50's or whatever, his cock is real, it's not on steroids or viagra, so when he's getting sucked off, or sticking his cock into the girl's pussy, it's not like he's a stunt cock, but a real person who's having his fun. A very different vibe from most porn videos. At least for me. Note: I'm not saying that Jim Slip is a regular guy. He's a porn star, and his wife is also a porn star. And they are married in real life. The videos are somewhat scripted: For legal reasons, they would need to have forms filled out before they started shooting. The girl has agreed to be filmed, and agreed to the sex, before they start shooting. I'm not saying the Woodman videos are terrible. But the mindset is different. Woodman uses and abuses his models. He would claim otherwise. But that's bullshit. The Jim Slip videos are a nice change of pace from most porn I've seen. I think he's found a way to satisfy his craving for young pussy, and to make it pay. So more power to him. I know the Jim Slip videos are porn. But when I watch them, I think it's more like a curious video than a porn video. Watching Jim Slip come onscreen in his green and blue patterned stockings, dressed in a white shirt and stroking his penis while a cute young woman settles onto his lap to get fucked, it's not erotic, it's more like I'm you're watching an instructional video that isn't very sexy, from high school. But that's just me. Old-young is not my niche. Giving the Jim Slip site a score of 83. If you're into old guy-younger woman, the site offers a lot of content. Filmed with good technical qualities. I think the Jim Slip site is interesting. It seems different from most porn sites I've seen. The British flavor and the tone of the site gives it interest. However, my two favorite sites at Adult Prime, by far, are Club Sweethearts and Digital Desire: They are more traditional porn, and do a great job filming some lovely cuties. 04-19-22  05:44am Replies (0) Review 65 All Girl Massage (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Many videos from the last few years are available for streaming and downloads in 288p through 4K. -A large lesbian massage site. One of many lesbian sites in the Adult Time network. There are also many lesbian videos scattered throughout the other channels in Adult Time. Lesbian sex is a popular niche. -Part of the Adult Time network. Over 300 channels to choose from, covering a wide variety of niches. Over 55,000 hardcore videos of good to excellent quality. -Customer support is 24/7. With a live chat option that answers within a few minutes. -Many videos have subtitles in different languages. -The videos have excellent technical qualities: good to excellent camera-work, expensive sets, nice costumes, excellent lighting, good sound control. -Unlimited streaming. -There is a daily download limit of 3 GB, which is a huge amount of data. -You can stream a video at your choice of speed: 0.5x, 1x, 2x, 4x. Seems like a gimmick to me. -There is a text description of the video plot. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Sometimes they try to add different elements to the plot. Kenna James is step-sister to Carolina Sweets. Both are cute blondes. Who like each other. But the liking turns too intense, when they find out their parents marriage is falling apart. Also, Carolina Sweets confesses that she lost her virginity to Kenna James' brother, who is Carolina Sweets' step-brother. Guilt! Anguish. What are they supposed to do? The two young women find comfort in each other's arms. Which turns to passion. Which is wonderful, exciting, except it's also incest. Watching these videos shows you that although there is hope, there are also problems in the real world. CONS(START OF): -Photosets download with zip file with a generic name, such as "120092", which has to be changed to add whatever data you need to file it. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Photosets normally have 35 photos per set. Which seems very small, when you have lovely models in a video. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The simplest way to get download privileges is with a yearly membership. Many PU members want a monthly membership, which is normally streaming only. However, if you contact customer support, they might offer you a monthly membership with downloading privileges. -It pays to wait for holiday specials, which offer nice discounts for your membership. -One problem with an Adult Time membership is you're bombarded with thumbnails of absolutely scrumptious models, so you're trying to find a video in a particular channel, and you are distracted by a model from a different channel. I'm looking at a thumbnail of Coco Lovelock at Adult Time: -"Lost Little Lamb", a Pure Taboo video posted, 2022-04-07, features Coco Lovelock, a tiny, slender blonde with an angelic face. She's 4' 10", weighs 85 lbs. So you could scoop her up in your arms and do nasty things to her. Since she's a porn star, if you pay her enough, she'd probably be willing. She started in porn in 2019. Her DOB is 1999-06-10. If you're a real fan, you can collect used panties and lingerie from Coco, as per her twitter account. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): All Girl Massage has 639 videos. Almost all have a matching photoset. Photosets average 35+ photos per set. Site focuses on girl-girl sex and massages. With hundreds of videos, you get an A-list of porn stars, including Dillion Harper, Kristen Scott, Scarlett Sage, Elena Koshka, and hundreds more. The plots are normally simple. A young woman getting a massage by another woman, which turns into a sexual encounter. Sometimes it's both women are young, sometimes it's young-older. Sometimes it might be sex between step-relatives: either step-sisters, step-daughter and step-mother. Since step-relative sex is illegal in many jurisdictions, I don't know why they don't feature blood-relative sex in porn. But I assume that fake-incest is more legal than real-incest (blood incest). So the performers normally state or imply they are 18 years old (or older) and they are having sex with a step-relative, not a blood relative, in the video. Real bottom line: The All Girl Massage channel of Adult Time is a fine lesbian massage site. Filmed in videos with good to excellent technical qualities: expensive sets, excellent camera-work, good lighting, good colors, good sound control. Attractive models. You also have access to the entire Adult Time network, one of the best bargains in porn today. Some people complain that the site can become boring. But two factors to consider: -Some people will always complain, no matter what. -Too much content at a site will turn people off to the value of the site. That's human nature. The site and network is not perfect. There's too much content to search it easily and find what appeals to you. And the photosets download with a generic filename, and have to be re-named. And the photosets are too small, only 35 photos per set. But these are minor quibbles. The All Girl Massage channel of Adult Time is a recommended join. Especially if you wait for a holiday special, and join Adult Time at a reduced price. 04-18-22  06:51am Replies (0) Review 66 Princess Cum (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network, a fine teen-oriented network featuring young, attractive models. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Excellent quality videos and photosets. -The photosets are made with real photos, not screencaps. -You can stream the photosets in your choice of small, medium or large size. -Videos offered in 270p, 360p, 540p, 720p, 1080p, 4K. -You can stream movies in .25x, .50x, 1x, 1.5x, and 2x runtime. -Members allowed to comment on scenes. Both positive and negative comments allowed. Many of the comments are stupid. But it's nice to see how opinion can vary so widely. -Content is exclusive. Cons: Cons are minor. This is a fine site, a fine network. -The plots are really stupid. Think of the videos as farce, which makes them more acceptable. Except that farce is more sensible than the videos shown at this site. -There is a control to set the interval for a slide show, but the control is hard to use, it keeps disappearing from the monitor, so you can't set the rate the photos change very easily. -The model page has very little information on the model. Here's a sample bio, for Gia Ohmy, a cute 22-year-old from the US. My guess is that the site operators don't understand English very well, and when they write "Biography" for the model's page, they fill the section with porno-style blurbs, instead of giving any biographical facts. "Look at the tits and ass that Gia Ohmy can't help but show off. Her big jiggling assets are almost as hot as her sex drive. Gia can't wait to get her clothes on the ground and a hard cock between her thighs, so don't delay this shorty's pleasure." Bottom Line: The videos shown as POV are just regular videos shot through a single camera. On a TBP review, a reviewer writes: "POV clearly focuses on point-of-view scenes where the male performer doubles as the cameraman." But that doesn't apply to the Princess Cum site. The cameraman is not the stunt cock. So my guess is that the term is loosely used. The site theme is young girls getting fucked. A sample plot summary is: "Gia Ohmy is lying in bed reading with her vag and ass hanging out of her miniskirt when her stepbrother, Apollo Banks, walks past her open door. Apollo debates whether to say anything, but when he comes back past Gia's door he sees that she's now on her back, skirt hiked up to expose it all. He goes into Gia's room to ask what's going on. That's when Gia informs Apollo that she's been reading an article about how airing out her pussy before sex is very important. Gia has a date tonight, so she thought she'd try it out right away. Apollo is as understanding as he can be, but he also points out that Gia has some bed fuzz on her pussy lips. She asks him to take it off for her, which prompts her to suggest that maybe she has really exposed herself because she secretly wants to fuck her stepbrother. Gia goes on to tell Apollo that he has 30 seconds to finger her pussy or she's putting it away. How could Apollo say no? He goes right to work finger banging his stepsis as she moans her delight. Since Gia can feel that Apollo is nice and hard, she unzips his jeans to get at his hardon. Her handie quickly turns into a blowjob as her horniness overcomes her. When Gia rolls onto her back and spreads her thighs, Apollo just goes ahead and shoves it right in. It turns out that Apollo's stepsis is a wildcat in bed! She wants it on her hands and knees in doggy, which is the perfect opportunity for Apollo to worship her big ass with his hand. Gia rolls onto her side for some deep spooning sex next, but despite her orgasms she's not finished with Apollo yet. Pushing her stepbrother onto his back, Gia climbs on top and sinks her hairy pussy down onto his fuck stick for a stiffie ride. She winds up on her back with Apollo going to town as he tries to peak. When he's ready to cum, Apollo tries to pull out. Wrapping her legs and arms around him, Gia holds her stepbrother in for a creampie. Dripping with Apollo's cum, Gia is all satisfied smiles." Gia Ohmy is an attractive blonde. Very pretty face, voluptuous body. Nicely photographed and videotaped. I only wish the plot made more sense. That there was some element of seduction or build-up to the sex, instead of foolishness. But the site specializes in foolish plots. And they like to re-use some plot elements. For example, the stunt cock often apologizes for not pulling out before he came. And the girl says it doesn't matter. She loved it. So the guy says it's lucky she's on birth control. And the girl smiles and says she isn't. So the guy looks startled, and confused. While the girl just giggles or smiles happily. So plots are minimal or stupid. But the models are attractive. And the sex is mainly bread-and-butter sex. Cock sucking, pussy licking, vaginal penetration, creampie. The videos are professionally shot. Good camera work, good lighting and good colors, nice sets. I don't appreciate the stupid plots. You're supposed to laugh at the models who are acting like sex-crazed idiots. But it's not my niche. Giving the site a score of 85. 04-16-22  12:07pm Replies (0) Review 67 Shadow Slaves (0) 81.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Prime network, a European network that has elements going back to before the internet existed. -Shadow Slaves is a BDSM site. -Some of the models are cute or attractive. Pixie and Crystel-Lei and Lyarah. But you get different body types: slender, as well as big models. Most slave masters are men, but you also have slave mistresses abusing a female slave. Cons: -Small site. Only 56 videos. -Since Adult Prime is a European network, they spell some words funny. Like arse, which means ass. Or bum, which is proper English for the part of the body that you sit on. -Watching these videos, you realize how expensive a BDSM hobby can become. You need lots of special equipment: all types of whips, different paddles, handcuffs and ropes and other restaints, clamps, balls to stick in your woman's mouth, special exercise equipment to hang your slave on the ceiling or off the floor. Maybe a cattle prod from Amazon or your local adult store for extra excitement. Other types of electric prods to make her squeal. Sparklers to stick in your slave's bum, while lit. Should be careful not to burn the slave by accident. You also need to buy special clothes that are easily ripped with your bare hands. No knives needed when ripping the clothes from your female slave. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Also need lots of clothes pins to hang from your slaves tits, and other body parts that might be sensitive. -Candles, to drip hot wax onto your slave's body parts. -A bic lighter, to re-light the candles that sometimes go out. -You can only stream or download the videos in 720p. Note: that is wrong. The website has text that shows the videos are available in 720p for streaming and downloads. But when you download a video, the actual definition might be 576p. -The file size for a video is huge. A 52 minute video at 576p definition, can be 1.93 GB. -Most videos offer a choice of 540p, 720p, 1080p for videos and photos. Other videos might only offer a 720p choice. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Using a quote from the Shadow Slaves website: "The Shadow Slaves website is actually a legend on the web. The owner is actually obsessive/compulsive about including the most recent BDSM as well as Fetish videos as well as photos he is able to lay the grubby of his little hands on. In case he cannot find the unpleasant BDSM scenes he requires for Shadow Slaves, he basically has the very own picture staff of his go out and make it for him! All genuine BDSM footage of real slavegirls in hardcore fetish movies, unique bondage punishments and extreme humiliation." I don't know how much actual pain the slaves are experiencing. The site seems to focus more on humiliation than actual torture. I believe there is mild pain, but not extreme pain. At some of the extreme sex sites I've seen, the women seem to experience more pain during the sex, than the Shadow Slaves site videos. On a personal level, I've experienced mild to severe pain, at hospitals for different conditions. If you experience severe pain, it's almost impossible to stop from screaming and/or crying. The models here are not screaming or crying. They are making noises that are supposed to show pain, but it's mild pain, mild noises. Yes, individuals have different levels of pain tolerance, but these women are being humiliated more than being tortured. There's one video, "Introducing Elise Graves", where the mistress is supposed to be treating the female slave roughly. And the slave is screaming loudly. But it's more theater than real. The mistress is kicking the slave in the buttocks, these are real kicks, but the buttocks is not a sensitive area of your body, so screaming loudly if you are kicked in the ass is theatrics, not experiencing real pain. If you enjoy BDSM, this site might offer some worthwhile content. The site focuses on humiliation, not severe torture. But there is mild pain suffered by the slaves, and the master or mistress gets some satisfaction by dominating the slaves. The site only has 56 videos. So I'm giving it a score of 81. 04-07-22  12:00pm Replies (0) Review 68 OldieX (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Prime network, which includes Club Sweethearts and Digital Desire, two excellent young adult sites. -OldieX is a large site, with 582 videos. You have 571 photo sets, so almost all videos have a matching photo set. -Videos for the last few years are available in 540p, 720p, 1080p, 4k. For both streaming and downloads. -Unlimited streaming and downloads, as far as I can tell. Note: I don't download much, so I have little practical experience with download limits. -The models are real people. What I mean is, you get old farts playing old farts. And young teens playing teens. And people in their twenties and thirties and forties playing their age. -This is reality porn. Not a lot of plot. You get people on a cheap-looking set, and they start touching each other, kissing, fondling, having sex, don't need much or any build-up to the sex. Cheap street clothes (or cheap lingerie for the females sometimes), they speak in a foreign language. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): There are no subtitles, but you don't need subtitles anyway, because whatever they're saying is basically meaningless bullshit, other than the moans, groans, uuuuhhhsss, and other noises, which translate well enough. -I think this site is one of the better example of reality porn, where you can believe what you are seeing, since there's almost no plot. -Although videos and photosets are done on a shoe-string budget (cheap sets, cheap street or bedroom clothes, probably paid the models next to nothing), the technical qualities of the videos are good: good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control. CONS(START OF): -The model page is very limited. You don't get a nice thumbnail of the model by herself/himself, to show what the model looks like. You don't get much personal information on the model. What you get is links to the model's videos. Since the models are European, you can't even tell from the name whether the model is male or female, Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): since the thumbnails show a group photos, instead of a thumbnail of the individual model. -Note: even when the models speak in English, their accent can be so heavy, I can't understand what they are saying. I think they are speaking Engish, but to me, it's just mangled speech. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Prices are in Euros. Not US dollars. So you will probably be charged a conversion fee. -Login details are assigned, can't choose your own. -Default file name is "720p_fullcomplete", so you have to manually change filename to include the data you want. -You have to enter a captcha to login. But the captcha is easy to read. BOTTOM LINE: Site theme is a young person having sex with an older person. Not my favorite niche. With 582 videos and 571 photo sets, this site should offer plenty of content for anyone who enjoys old vs young sex. You have grandmas fucking young studs. Teens fucking older guys. Lesbian sex of old-young. Group sex mixing young and old in various ways, straight and lesbian. Since I like pretty young models, this site does not appeal to me. There are some attractive young models, but they are mainly fucking older people. Setting aside my personal preferences, I think this is might be a fine site for people into old-young. You get a wider range of old-young than I've ever seen. Most of the old-young sites I've seen are old guys fucking young girls. There are some sites with old women with young studs, but those sites are the minority, as far as I can tell. However, this site goes far beyond what I've seen: this site mixes old-young for young-female/old-male, younger male-/older female, young-old lesbian, group sex with a young couple mixing it with an older couple, group sex with lots of young and old people going to it, multiple guys on an old woman, if you can think of any combination, they probably have it. One of the sub-sites in the OldieX site is cuckoldest.com, which has husbands watching their wives get fucked by other men. Adult Prime also has a live chat channel. I'm not into live chat, but this channel has a lot of attractive young teen models. The live chat channel has a wide range of models: mainly young, attractive models, but also young models on the heavy side, middle-aged models with different body types. If you're into old-young and like unattractive older men and women, this is a fine site with plenty of content. The videos were cheaply made (street or bedroom clothes, low-rent sets, amateur models), but the technical qualities of the videos are very good (good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control). So the videos are extremely watchable. There is a photoset for almost every video. The photosets are nice quality screencaps, averaging 100-170 screencaps per set. The photosets are worth collecting as a fast way to review a video. Giving the site a score of 85. I wish the site more easily identified the name of each model. And gave the downloaded video and photoset file non-generic names. Instead, you have to re-name each video and photoset to include the data you need. But you get a large amount of good quality videos. And the screencap sets are nice quality. So if you're into old-young, and really enjoy unattractive-looking people, this is a fine site. And the cuckold adds some queer/kink content. 04-07-22  09:48am Replies (0) Review 69 The White Boxxx (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Used to be the finest glamcore site on the internet. -The models are selected to be attractive to extremely attractive. They are showcased in a luxurious setting that sets off their beauty, with clear, crisp videos, strong colors, white background that allows you to focus on the model and the sensous sex on display. -Videos have a definition from 240p through 1080p. That is both streaming and downloading. -Sometimes you get a popup ad with a timer that counts down the hours, minutes, seconds the ad is supposed to be active. Ads an element of urgency to joining the site at the reduced price (sarcasm). Cons: -Due to the covid epidemic, the update rate for the site (and the entire network) has slowed. Over the last year, the site has added about 4.5 new scenes per month. The network update rate is very slow. Maybe 10 new videos per month for the network. Most sites in the network stopped updating years ago. LetsDoeIt network has 18 different sites. Only 4 sites are still updating. -They slapped a limit of 100 videos per month downloads for the network. Not just per site, but for the entire network. -Photosets contain from 6 to 10 photos per set. Hardly worth collecting, even though the models range from attractive to lovely, because you get so few photos for each scene. -There is no 4K option, even though many porn sites have offered 4K since 2015 or 2016. Which seems strange for a glamour-oriented site. Bottom Line: The site has 376 scenes. Each scene has a video and a photoset. Because the photosets are so tiny, 10 photos or less per set, they are not worth collecting. Because of the slow update rate (averaging 4.5 new scenes per month, for the site, about 10 new scenes per month for the network), I can't recommend a membership beyond 1 or 2 months. And the limit of 100 videos per month for the network is also a negative. Not offering 4K videos seems strange, especially for a glamour site. Many people want a 4K option, to view it on a big screen. At one time I thought the network was a fine join. No longer. Not since the slower update rate, the fact that only 4 sites are still updating. And the 100 video limit reduces the value still further. Even though The White Boxx still produces some visually stunning erotic glamour videos, with models that look gorgeous, there are other sites that give you more quantity, with no download limits, and the quality of the competing sites can come close to what The White Boxxx offers. The Wow network, for a reduced price of $70/year, if you catch one of their discounts, is a fine alternative. You wouldn't normally think the Wow network is high quality porn, but take a look at the videos and photosets they've offered in the last few years. Wow network has moved from a medium quality network to a high quality network on their content. Both videos and photosets. With no download limits. With good update rates. Wow doesn't go for glamour as such, but the videos are clear, crisp, with wonderful colors, and the girls range from cute to lovely. 04-06-22  05:08pm Replies (0) Review 70 Tricky Agent (0) 59.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Tricky Agent is the first porn site every young adult should join. It teaches you life lessons: how to seduce and fuck young women for free. Also, how to lie effectively. -Verotel is the default payment processor. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've found them reliable and helpful. -You get access to about 14 sites in the Dirty Flix network. None of the sites require a premium upgrade. -Content is exclusive. -No limits on streaming or downloads. Cons: -The listed price (even with a PU discount) is high: Monthly: $29.95 (recurring) 1 Year: $119.95 (non-recurring) However, during holiday specials, there are discounts: $59.95/year is the price I joined for. -The normal login and member pages are non-secure. But if you put "https:" in the address bar when logging in, you are secure. A tip that exotics4me gave me. -Login details are computer generated. A random selection of characters you have to write down to get access to the site. -There are ads on every page. Standard for porn sites. Don't be distracted by the ads. Go for the videos you already paid for. The ads are thumbnails of cute girls, that open a new page that invites you to join a different site. Sometimes you forget these thumbnails are ads, and click on them, hoping that will open a video at the site you're already logged into. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Tricky agent is an archive site. The last video was added on Jun 24, 2017. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): The previous video was added on Nov 11, 2016. So even when the site was active, updates were sporadic. -Small site. 57 videos. Each video has an accompanying photoset. The photosets average around 70-110 screencaps. The photosets are not worth collecting, because they are poor quality screencaps. -They mosaic the face of the stunt cock, to add an element of verisimilitude to the videos and screencaps. Which I find annoying. -When they film the stunt cock following and meeting the girl, the camera-work is jerky, they're shooting with a hand-held camera and the camera-man is an amateur who jiggles the camera as he walks to film the scene. The inside scenes are better, but still have the mosaic and lose focus a lot. -I don't know if it's the mosaic disguising the head of the stunt cock or that the video is not crisp and clear, but I actually get a headache from watching videos at this site. The focus, even on the inside scenes, is not crisp and clear. I can watch videos at most porn sites for hours. Watching the videos at Tricky Agent I can watch for a few minutes, then I start to get a headache and it's fucking not worth watching. -The videos are shot in Russia. There are English subtitles, so you can follow the dialog. Not a negative for me, since I enjoy reading subtitles. Other people might be annoyed by subtitles. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The site theme: A guy offers random girls the chance to do a test shoot to get into movies. The guy is a liar: he seduces the girls, or he has a partner who seduces the girls, but he has no ties to any legitimate movie company. The models are young teens. Mainly attractive. -In spite of the cute models at the site, I'm giving the site a score of 59. -This is an archive site. One video added in 2017. Before then, update rate was sporadic. -The sceensets are screen caps, and not worth collecting. -The videos, for me, are unwatchable. It might be the mosaic they use to disguise the stunt cock's face. Or it might be the jerky camera work, which is most evident when filming outside scenes, but also present for inside scenes. And the focus of even the inside scenes is not a crisp and clear film, but uneven. The mosaic to disguise the stunt cocks face can move to his shirt or hand or anywhere in the screen, so parts of the monitor are blurred momentarily and the focus turns to shit. That's what causing my headache. My eyes are trying to visualize the scene, which is out of focus, along with the blurred mosaic effect. The videos from a few years back are not as jerky as the more recent videos. My guess is that they used a better camera-man. Even in the earlier videos, you have problems with the focus of the film, so the image is not crisp and clear. I would much rather spend my time watching better quality videos. For me, the videos are not worth watching. The photosets are not worth viewing. There are sites in the network that are worth viewing. When I wrote: "Tricky Agent is the first porn site every young adult should join. It teaches you life lessons: how to seduce and fuck young women for free. Also, how to lie effectively." I hope you realize that I was being sarcastic. 04-04-22  05:18pm Replies (0) Review 71 Jizz Bomb (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network. You get access to the entire network. None of the sites require a premium membership. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Content is exclusive. -The production and technical qualities of most videos is good to excellent: Nice sets, good to excellent lighting, colors, sound control, steady camera-work that is focused and well shot. -The quality of the models is good to very good: a lot of cute or attractive or very nice-looking models. The models are late teens or early 20s. -They normally try to have some plot to the videos. The acting is above average. The dialog is OK, which is better than the dialog of many porn sites. You don't have to cringe while watching these videos from the stupid acting or stupid plot or dialog: This isn't cinematic quality porn, but it's better quality than many hardcore porn sites. Cons: -Navigation can be tricky. You select the Jizz Bomb site, and the videos that load are all New Sensations network videos. Not only Jizz Bomb videos. There's supposed to be a way to list the Jizz Bomb videos by date posted, but that system doesn't work. The chronological listing system works for most New Sensations sites, but not at Jizz Bomb. There isn't even the format that is supposed to give you the chonological listing. There's a format to get an alphabetical listing of videos at Jizz Bomb. But the system doesn't bring up Jizz Bomb videos: it seems to give you a listing of New Sensations videos from different sites in the network. Part of the problem is that a Jizz Bomb video is not watermarked as a Jizz Bomb video. Instead, it's watermarked as a New Sensations video. And there's often no text description on the page that categorizes the site the video belongs to. So for many videos, you're left guessing what site the video belongs to. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Some Family XXX have a Family XXX watermark on their videos, but most network videos only have the "New Sensations" watermark. And most videos don't clearly have an external text listing that identifies which site they belong to. -They use a limited number of stunt cocks in the videos. The models change frequently, for the different videos, but the stunt cocks normally appear in lots of the New Sensations videos. -It appears the site stopped updating years ago. Since I can't get a chronological listing, I can't tell when the updates stopped. -The earliest videos were only offered in 480p. Then they started offering 720p and 1080p. Later still, they offered 4K. But I don't think there are any 4K videos offered at the Jizz Bomb site, because the site probably stopped updating before they offered 4K at the network. That's a guess, because I don't know when they stopped updating at this site. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): I think the site theme is heavy sex finishing with the stunt cock exploding his cum over the girl. At least, that's what the idea is supposed to be, from the site title. But after watching a number of videos from the site (or what I think are Jizz Bomb videos), the amount of cum the stunt cock sprays varies. You do get a money shot, where the stunt cock comes, but the amount can be tiny. Don't expect to see guys spraying tons of cum over a girl's body: face, ass, pussy, whatever. That's what the site title implies, but it's not what you get: you get tiny amounts of cum, or maybe a normal amount of cum. On average, you can expect a small amount of cum, but lots of saliva from the girl spitting and licking and sucking on the stunt guy's cock. Also, dial down your expectations of heavy sex. There is sex, but it's more bread and butter sex, not really over the top. To watch over-the-top sex, a better site would be Teen Fidelity, which often has very energetic sex in plot-driven porn. Navigation is poor. I don't know how to get a listing of Jizz Bomb videos. And if I watch a video, I often can't tell which site the video is supposed to belong to. Many or most videos only have the New Sensations watermark, not the watermark of the site they belong to. And there's no text description, or tags, or anything to indicate what site many videos belong to. Years ago, there was a much better system of listing the Jizz Bomb videos: by both posting date and alphabetically. I even wrote a review on the Jizz Bomb site on 02-07-19. At that time the site software gave a much better indication of what videos (and photosets) belonged to the jizz bomb site. But recently, I can't find any listing of videos that belong to Jizz Bomb. I think the best site on the network is the Family XXX site. Normally, I'm not a fan of fake incest sites, which is sex between step relatives. Fake incest can add to the sexual tension of the video. And at Family XXX, they do a better job than most step-incest sites: the plots aren't as phony. Especially the Amber Moore video titled "Amber's Teen Pussy Is Step Daddy's Favorite". I don't think Amber Moore is the most beautiful model at the site or network, but this video really works: an attractive young woman, seducing her step-father. The technical features are good to excellent: nice sets, lovely girl, simple but believable plot, good acting, good sex, not a lot of over-the-top moaning and groaning, fine lighting and camera-work: This is one of the better videos at the network. I'm giving Jizz Bomb a score of 80. That's mainly because I don't know what the site is. But because you have access to the New Sensations network, and probably hundreds of videos are supposed to be belong to the Jizz Bomb site, I figure the site deserves a good rating. Even if I can't tell what videos belong to the site. 04-03-22  02:17pm Replies (0) Review 72 Mommy's Girl (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Time network. -The young girls are mainly attractive teens or 20s models. Coco Lovelock, Haley Spades, Athena Faris, Khloe Kapri, Laney Grey, Haley Reed, etc. The older women playing the step-mothers are also attractive: Sofie Marie, Silvia Saige, etc. -All memberships have unlimited streaming. You can stream videos in 288p through 2160p (4K). -If you have downloading privileges, you can download the videos in 160p through 2160p (4K). -Videos have a photoset which is based on the video. There's a zip file for the photoset. Cons: -Adult Time has different types of memberships. Many short-term memberships are streaming only. The easiest way to get downloading privileges is with a yearly membership. Except many PU members don't want to get locked into a yearly membership. -Navigation can be confusing. Two main reasons: a huge amount of content, over 55,000 hardcore videos. Plus, content covering many different niches. So you've got, in the main, lots of content at most sites (hundreds of videos), and hundreds of different sites, and it's hard to get a simple listing for most of the sites. So even though the massive content is a positive, it's also a negative because finding the content that appeals to you can be time-consuming. And not as easy as it would be if they laid out the content into separate sites more logically, that can be searched more easily. -A common negative is that the models start moaning loudly and screaming loudly to show fake excitement. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Some noises, some moans and groans would add to the excitement, if they are believable, but at Mommy's Girl, it's too fake, and takes away from the scene. -With so much content, it's easy to start complaining about the quality of the content. That's human nature. Most of the content is good to excellent quality, in technical terms. But people will complain that the content is bland or repetitive or lacking freshness. Personally, I think there's a huge amount of content that I don't appreciate, but there's also a lot of content that I find appealing. Which is a navigation problem. -A fairer complaint that people have with the site and network is variable download speeds. I don't see a lot of people complaining about streaming issues, but more people complain about download speeds which can vary a lot. Personally, I don't download very much, because I have a slow connection to my ISP, and it's not worth the hassle of wasting my time with downloads. But for people who want fast downloads, that is a valid issue, but they will have to live with what they get. There's no question but that Adult Time is a very popular network, and lots of people are streaming and downloading, which puts a strain on their servers. -There's a model's page, but it only has links to the model's videos. No personal information. -There's a 300 GB daily limit. Which seems huge to me, and should not be a problem for anyone who is not trying to download the entire network in a short time period. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Part of the Adult Time network. Adult Time advertises itself as the only porn site you'll ever need. I don't know how true that is, because I belong to many different porn sites, and I think many of them are worth joining. However, if you are on a very limited budget, the Adult Time network gives you a tremendous amount of hardcore porn, covering many different niches. Mommy's Girl features lesbian porn. Specifically, old-young porn. Where a step-mother and her step-daughter are having sex. So it's part of the fake incest niche (or what I consider fake incest, which is sex between step-relatives, instead of real incest which would be sex between blood relatives). -This is story-driven porn. The plots are supposed to be important. So the models get to demonstrate their acting chops. Except that many of these models can't act, and the plots and dialog are sophomoric, so you either turn off your brain, and try to focus on the physical attractiveness of the models, or ignore the plots and poor acting, and again, focus on the physical attractiveness of the models. Adult Time network has other sites that either focus on lesbian action or feature lesbian action. Web Young, Girlsway, Girlfriends Films, Adam And Eve Pictures, 1111 Customs, Addicted2Girls, Teenage Lesbian, Sweetheart Video, etc. With so many different sites featuring lesbian action, you should be able to find a lot of content that appeals to you, if you're into lesbian porn. At some Adult Time sites the plots are more believable, or the acting or sex is better. I think that Mommy's Girl is a good addition to the Adult Time network. The site gives you good lesbian porn with a plot. The plots are often foolish. The acting is not very good. But the models are attractive. And the technical qualities are good (good camera work, good lighting, nice sets, good sound control--except they moan and scream too much and too loud). And you get access to the Adult Time network, which raises the score to 90. Even if the Mommy's Girl site was poor, and it's not, access to the Adult Time network is worth 90 points by itself. 03-31-22  01:31am Replies (0) Review 73 Kinky Family (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Dirty Flix network. -Many of the models used are young teens. Many of them are cute or attractive. -Verotel is the default billing processor. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but when I had a problem once, Verotel was quick to respond and solve it. -PU has a link to a discounted membership price of $60/year. Or $15 for the first month. -Most videos are available in 240p, 720p, 1080p for streaming. For the last few years, there is a 4K option for video downloads. -There is photoset of each video, that can be streamed or downloaded. Cons: -The last update to the network was Feb 22, 2022. The last update to the site was Feb 11, 2022. Site updates are always slower than network updates, but it looks like the site and the network might have stopped updates. Until recently, the site gave 2 or 3 updates per month. But it's been 44 days since the last site update. And 33 days since the last network update. -Regular membership price to Dirty Flix is $120/year. But you can often find a holiday special for $60/year. PU has a link to the Kinky Family site for $60/year membership. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Normal login and member pages are non-secure. But if you put "https" in front of the address bar, you get a secure login, less chance of being hacked. (A tip from PU member exotics4me) -Ads on every member page. Again, standard for porn sites. -The photosets are more like a set of screencaps. There is one definition for the zip file, and the photosets are not worth collecting. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The mechanism for playing a slideshow online is primitive. Much better to download the zip file and use your computer's program to play the slideshow. Except most photosets are low quality screen caps that are not worth viewing. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Kinky Family focuses on what I call fake incest: sex between step-relatives, which is one of the more popular niches in the last few years. I don't know why people think sex between step-relatives is thrilling or perverted, but I guess that most people have a legal bent that wants to criminalize sex, because sex is dirty and illegal and let's make whoopee and fuck over as many people as we can. That's always a fun thing to do. You sit on a curb and smoke a cigarette, and a guard or cop can accuse you of loitering. And tell you to move on. That's true, even if it's still legal to smoke in that area. The site has 144 movies. All the movies feature late teen, early 20s models. Many of them are cute or attractive. The plots are girls fucking with their step-brothers, or their step-fathers. The plots are thin, but the girls are attractive. So who cares if the dialog might be trite, the situations unrealistic. These girls are fucking attractive. You watch these videos, and your body responds. Kamryn Jayde, Ellie Idol, Paris White, etc. Ellie Eilish is named "Ellie Idol" at this site, and her age is given as 33 for the video posted Feb 10, 2020. My guess is that Ellie Eilish is being confused with some other model. The video was posted Feb 10, 2020, when Ellie Eilish was 18 or 19. Ellie Eilish is an American model/porn actress, who first appeared in porn in Nov 2019 at FTVgirls.com, and has since appeared at over 25 other sites. A cute girl, slender, white, expressive face, puts on a great show. She's one of the better actresses in porn. No matter how stupid the plot or dialog, she comes across as a young teen with issues, and you believe her, she establishes an instant connection, you feel for her, and God, you wish it was you pounding away on that slim, tender young body. Porn is fantasy. And she draws you into that fantasy. I'm saying the videos are good to great. That's not because of the stupid plots. But the models are young and attractive. The video style is fake reality porn, but it works. Because you focus on the girls. And their bodies. And the videos can make you horny. Which is the purpose of porn. Bottom line: This is a large site. 144 movies. It's not updating currently. So that's a negative. And the stupid plots are a negative. But the girls are attractive, and the sex is what I call bread-and-butter, which means you get a mixture of pussy licking, cock sucking, vaginal sex. The taboo of fake-incest is supposed to add heat to the scenes. Step-brother fucking his step-sister, step-father fucking his step-daughter. So if you are into teen porn, and can ignore the stupid plots, this site (and network) is a worthwhile join. The $60/year membership price is a bonus. 03-27-22  06:20pm Replies (2) Review 74 Four Finger Club (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network. You can usually find a holiday special of $60/year. The regular price with a PU discount is $120. -New Sensations has around 15 sites. You get access to all the sites, none require a premium upgrade. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. No captcha or other problems. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -They did a network update, and made the public page and member pages refreshed with bigger thumbnails that makes the network and sites more appealing. -A lot of attractive models. You can find loads of attractive models at many hard and soft porn sites. I can't say these models are exceptional, but many are attractive to very attractive. -You can stream videos, or download them, in 720p, 1080p, 4K in 2 different bit rates for each definition. -Content is exclusive. Cons: -Last update was in February 2021. -A page of ads when you log in, before you get to the member's area. -Ads on every member page. -The plots are mainly simplistic. Most porn stars/models are not very good actors. So you're depending on the model's good looks and acting ability to create some heat. Some models are fine actors, or they have some chemistry that jumps off the monitor to make a photo or video have heat. -Lots of toy use. That's a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. Hitachi wand (the big-sized vibrator) and Sybian saddle (a vibrating dildo that a woman can ride) in different videos. -A fair number of the videos are interview of the models. Again, a plus or minus, depending on your personal preference. If I like a model, I'm more interested in her interview. Bottom Line: Site theme is lesbians having sex. I think the plots are minimal. Many of the plots involve sex between a younger woman and an older woman (older woman in her late 30s or 40s). Many of the older women have breast implants. Ivy Wolfe is a slut. I think she retired from porn in 2018. Cute face, slender body. She can put on a show. When I say "slut", I don't mean to be dis-respectful. I'm teasing. Ivy is lovely (she's more like cute or slightly pretty) and fucking hot. Compare her to Alya Stark (aka Arya Stark), who is physically lovely, but her porn scenes are more sensual, not the same eroticism or heat, but Alya Stark is so gorgeous, you just want to kiss and lick and fuck that gorgeous face and body for hours. Both models put on a show that's believable, and the models really seem to be getting off. Note: Ivy Wolfe appears in Four Finger Club and HotWifeXXX. Alya Stark does not appear in New Sensations, but I used her an example of a lovely young model (physically) who puts on a wonderful show. Some of the videos have really attractive women. And the videos can be slow, sensual, fun. Watch Eden Arya (aka Eden Addams) and Riley Nixon having some fun. Video titled "Eden's Trust Riley Will Take It Further", posted 08/18/2017. Bottom line: there are plenty of cute or attractive models at the site. And many of the videos are definitely worth watching. You just have to sort through to find the videos that appeal to you. The main benefit of the site is that it's part of the New Sensations network, which has a lot of attractive models, and a lot of videos and photosets that are worth examining. I don't think this is one of the better lesbian sites, because I don't enjoy too many of the videos. But that's just me. If you personally enjoy more of the videos, then the site will have more value for you. But I definitely think the site (and the network) are worth joining. Especially if you can find a $60/year membership. 03-25-22  09:28pm Replies (0) Review 75 Ultra Films (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -I want to thank PU member Avory for pointing out that Ultra Films/All Fine Girls/Wow Girls/Wow Porn often offers a special discounted membership of $70/year for access to all 4 sites. I was paying a much higher price to access those sites, until I found a similar offer. If you join a site, quite often they will charge you higher prices (or the same price as when you joined, instead of giving you the lower prices they offer to newer members). -For about the last 2 years, if you join any one of the following 4 sites, you get access to all 4 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films. -I was paying over $100 for access to the three sites, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn. Plus, I was paying for a separate membership to Ultra Films. So I consider $70/year for access to all 4 sites a bargain, especially since the 4 sites are top teen porn sites in the internet. -The main attraction of the sites is the catalog of models: Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): these girls (late teens, early 20s), range from cute or attractive to lovely. You don't get better than these girls. Some sites (like X-Art, or MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios or other fine porn sites) do have an amazing catalog of lovely models, but none of them outshine the models at the Wow network + Ultra Films. -The quality of the videos and photosets at the 4 sites is top of the line: mainly crystal clear images of these lovely girls. In living color. Well lighted. Good sound control. -So you can drool over these images in the privacy of your own home (or apartment, or wherever you wish. Except not on the bus or train or at work. These are images to be savored in private). -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Photosets offered in 1000px, 2000px, 4000px, and original definition, for both streaming and download. -The online streaming mechanism to view photosets is fast and easy to use. -Videos offered in 720p, 1080p, 4K. Newer videos have a 6K option. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): My equipment goes to 1080p, so I cry at night at the people who have finer, more expensive equipment than I can afford. -Navigation is easy. CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. -They require separate login details for the Ultra Film site that is different from the login details you use to access the other 3 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn. Technically, you are not a member of each of the 4 sites: you are only a member of one of the 4 sites, with access to the other 3 sites. -Customer service can be slow to respond. I've asked some questions of customer service, and never got a reply to some questions. And other PU members have also complained about customer service problems. But that happens with many porn sites. -The network used to have a forum where they would announce news of the network, and allow members to post comments and questions. They eliminated the forum years ago. A shame. I guess they didn't want to spend time maintaining the forum. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -This review is supposed to be on the Ultra Films site. But in my mind, I can't really distinguish between the 4 sites I've mentioned: all 4 sites are basically the same: the models are used at all 4 sites, the style of the shoots for videos and photosets is similar, the content is similar. They are marketed as 4 separates sites, but that is to increase revenue, not for artistic reasons. Years ago, the owners/operators of the sites would sometimes post a video of a shoot in Wow Girls, and post the photoshoot of the same video in Wow Porn, and vice versa. They didn't try to create sites with different styles of content or different themes: the idea of creating different sites was to generate more money. Basically, Ultra Films, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls and Wow Porn are 4 sites with the same style of content, that use the same models, the same staff (phographers, videographers) to shoot the content. If you're into hardcore teen porn, any one of these sites, or especially all 4 sites, are like teen heaven: you won't find more attractive models anywhere. You should be able to find a low membership price of $70/year, which is offered throughout the year, for the last couple of years now. What is the content: Solo girls. Mainly masturbation. Some masturbation with toys. Girl/girl sex. Multiple girls having sex with each other. Boy/girl sex. 2 guys on one girl. A guy on 2 girls. They mix it up. But the girls are almost uniformly attractive. And they seem to be enjoying themselves. The sex is not over the top. Not extreme. Not rough. Just good clean fun. These photosets and videos are a pleasure to watch. Much more interesting and erotic than what you can find at MetArt or Hegre (my personal opinion, I realize). You look at a photoset of Amanda Dee, titled "Make Me Want You", posted 24 Mar 2022. This is a solo girl photoset. The model is a slender white girl, around 20 years old, black or brown hair, cute, attractive, smiles a lot, small breasts, just a pleasure to look at. No toys in the photoset. In some scenes, she can come across as the young girl next door. Not as a porn star. And her interview, posted Mar 07, 2022, is unusual, in that she talks extensively about her personal life: how she spends time dancing, cooking, what she's studying at university, how she spends time with her boyfriend, she just comes across as a simple, normal young girl, not a porn star, just a cute young girl trying to make a meaningful and happy life for herself and her boyfriend and her parents. The model named Amanda Dee at the Wow sites is named Amanda Fine at Metart, MetartX, and Sexart. I don't know why, but I find the Amanda photosets more erotic at Wow network than I do at the Metart network sites. I can't explain with details. It's the same girl, more or less similar poses, but the colors are better at the Wow Girls site, there's more variety between each succeeding photo in the set, the overall effect is just stronger, better at the Wow Girls set versus any of the sets at the Metart network. What I'm saying is: you look at the set at Wow Girls, and you respond to it. You look at the set at Metart (or Metartx or Sexart), and there's less response in you. The model is not as attractive. She's not as pleasing. So even though Metart is famed as a one of the finest softcore sites on the internet, their photosets, even with lovely or beautiful models, can lack impact. Which can start to become boring. And for different reasons, the Wow network photosets are more valuable: the can have greater impact, hold your interest better, than what you find at Hegre or the Metart sites. Which doesn't make a lot of sense, until you yourself study the photosets at Metart and at the Wow network, and see which you prefer. Bottom line: I think Ultra Films (with the other 3 sites) is a no-brainer join for $70/year. If you're into hardcore teen porn. And it's worth joining, if you're into softcore teen porn. 03-24-22  11:05am Replies (14) Shown : 51-75 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.37 seconds.