Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : LKLK (0)

Feedback:   All (518)  |   Reviews (162)  |   Comments (40)  |   Replies (316) Other:   Replies Received (290)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 76-100 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 76 Club Sweethearts (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Prime network. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Suitable for all devices: Desktop, laptop, tablet, smartphone and TV. They update the public pages, and the member pages, to keep them fresh and appealing. Currently, I see one large illustration on the public home page that looks like a painting from a museum: This is smart advertising. And it shows a commitment to the site that gives you hope that the site will deliver freshness and quality beyond low-quality porn. -Easy to solve captcha. I'm not a fan of captchas, but at least the captcha is easy to read. -Covers different niches in teen porn. -Search is easy to use. Cons: -Cons are minor. This is a fine teen site, a fine teen network. -Prices are in euros. So your credit card company might charge a fee for currency conversion. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Some videos are non-exclusive. But that's no big deal. You should easily find thousands of new videos you haven't seen before. Bottom Line: Stats: Videos: 7437 Photos: 11290 User Clips: 13361 Teen Girls: 4083 DVDs: 147 -Club Sweethearts is the newer name for Club Seventeen. They changed the name because of porn laws that make it illegal for anyone under 18 to be in porn in the US. Actually, they changed the name around 2014, but the site existed under both names, for several years after that. -Adult Prime is a fine network. Not as well known as Adult Time, which has even more impressive stats as far as size. Maybe this is a branding problem: Adult Time advertises extensively. Adult Prime less so. But both networks (or at least, some components of these networks) have been around since, or before, the start of the internet. Adult Time network gives you some fine to great teen porn. They're running a St. Patrick's day special currently, €9.99/month. That is for a 1-year membership. For shorter memberships, you will pay around €19.99/month, or €14.99/month for a 6-month sub. Actually, that's the regular price you pay with a PU/TBP discount. Why do I like Adult Prime? It focuses more on teen porn (as opposed to Adult Time, which includes teen porn, but lots of other niches as well). So there's less material I have to scan through to find what I might like. The models at Adult Prime are mainly young and attractive. Club Sweethearts and Digital Desire are two of my favorite studios at the Adult Prime network: they both feature lovely young teens lusciously filmed. 03-23-22  03:04am Replies (0) Review 77 All Fine Girls (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Wow network. Network is 3 sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn. But if you join any one of the 3 sites, you get access to all 3 sites. Plus, you get access to UltraFilms. -This is one of the finest teen porn sites on the internet. -A collection of gorgeous young teen girls. -The videos are crisp and clear. The photosets the same crisp, clear images. Both the videos and the photosets are worth collecting. -Most of the content is exclusive. There are some videos that were posted at competing sites, mainly the massage videos. These massage videos are also posted at Tricky Masseur (part of Teen Megaworld), and at Rub A Teen (part of Team Skeet). The massage videos were first posted at Teen Megaworld, then posted at the Diesel network (which is now called the Wow network), then posted at Team Skeet. But the massage videos are definitely worth viewing, if you haven't seen them before. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): For some reason, the setup is simple but effective: get an attractive young girl to disrobe and lay on a table, start to massage her, she gets aroused, and the guy(the masseur) and the girl suck and fuck. Simple but more believable than many porn plots, many of the girls are attractive, and it's just easy to film, easy to watch. With massage videos, the models don't need much acting skills, and the stunt cocks don't need much acting skills or dialog, which are also pluses. -You can often find the site (and network) with a discounted price of $70/year. Which is a very low price for such an excellent network. For many years I paid over $100/year for the 3 subs, plus an extra fee for the Ultra Films site. The "normal" discount that PU/TBP shows is $90/year, but like I say, look for the $70/year that is often available. -Videos are offered in SD, HD, full HD, and 4K. -You can download the entire video, or selected scenes from a video. Bottom Line: CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. Many competing sites with hardcore teen porn also have attractive models, but the Wow network (formerly called the Diesel network) has probably the best collection of models on the internet. X-Art, a competing site featuring lovely young models (late teen, early 20s) in hardcore was also a fine site. But X-Art might be having current problems: The last update I see was from September 2021 at X-Art. -No search engine. This is a large site, and a large network. A search engine would make navigation better. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -This is one of the best hardcore teen sites on the internet. The reasons: -A catalog of attractive to lovely teen, early 20s models. -The videos are crystal clear, well focused, well lighted. -The photosets are excellent. First, you have the lovely models. Second, they are captured in bright, vibrant colors. It might not be MetArt or Femjoy photography, but those are softcore glamor sites. The photosets at All Fine Girls (and the other sites you get access to) are hardcore porn, so the action could easily be more interesting than the softcore photos at the MetArt or Femjoy. Don't get me wrong: I'm a fan of MetArt, think it's probably the best softcore photo site on the internet. But the teens at the Wow sites are just scrumptious. -A $70/year fee (includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads) is a bargain. You get access to 4 fine sites. There are other fine teen sites and networks. But for hardcore teen porn, I think the Wow network is at the top of the list. Adult Time is a fine hardcore network, that features a lot of teen content. Adult Time is a bargain, covering many niches. There will be a lot of content that is not great or to your taste, but if you can find the videos that you enjoy, the network is definitely worth joining. There are other fine hardcore networks on the internet. The problem is, you have limited money. Limited time. Where you do want to spend your money and time? Hopefully, on the sites that will give you the best experience. Personally, I think the Wow network does an excellent job of providing hardcore teen porn. 03-14-22  09:45pm Replies (2) Review 78 X Sensual (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Dirty Flix network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the network sites. -Network has 1517 movies, 779 models, 1514 photosets. Most of the models are young teens. Many are very attractive. -Newer movies have both MP4 and WMV file format for downloads. The MP4 format has more options for definition. MP4 has a file definition for Sony PSP, iPhone3 and iPod, a higher definition for iPhone4+ and iPad and Android, then 1080p for Mac and PC, and 4K version. For steaming, the same movie only has 240p, 720p, 1080p. That seems like plenty of optins for both streaming and downloading. But if you're a high-end enthusiast, you're probably going with the 4K, which is only available for downloads, not streaming. -Regular price for the site (and network) is high: $120/year $30/month But you can find a yearly price of $60/year during holiday specials. Or $15/month if you don't want a year-long membership. -There is a zip file for each photoset. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -You can favorite your favorite movies. -Navigation is basically simple. You can list the movies by chronology, top rated, most downloaded, etc. Search engine is basic, but does the job. CONS(START OF): -Login is not secure. Your browser shows a popup message, when you enter your login details, "This connection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised." A poor way to reward your members who pay for a membership. -The site update rate is irregular. They tried to update with 2-4 updates per month in 2019 or earlier, but when covid hit, the updates slowed to 1-2 per month. That's for movies. Each movie normally comes with a photoset. Bottom Line: X Sensual theme is young girls having sex. With a boy, with another girl, one guy with 2 girls, one girl with 2 guys. The main draw of the site (and network) is the cute young girls. They are mainly young teens (18-19), and attractive. They call the videos movies. There's not much plot. You have one or two girls, one or two guys. They usually start with clothes. There's very little dialog or talking. The girl or girls grab the guy and kiss him and undress him. (There's no seduction or lead-in to the sex. You watch these videos and realize: why bother with plot: let's get to the good stuff, already. And these Russian teens go with the script, which calls for the girls and guys to strip within the first 2-3 minutes and, with maybe some kisses and touches thrown in, start to lick and suck and fuck. The site title is "X Sensual", but a more apt title would be "Let's Fuck". Because I didn't find much sensual or teasing build-up to the sex. You can find videos where there's more of a lead-in. That's because the girl or guy is alone, he or she is taking a shower, he or she gets dressed, and then the girl or guy shows up, they talk for a couple of minutes, the girl loosens the guy's belt, pulls down his pants, and starts sucking on his dick. Actually, the bare-bones plots are probably the result of covid. If you watch the videos posted in 2019 and earlier, there was more interaction between the models before the sex. There was often some seduction, playfulness, teasing, and the sex scenes were better. The sets were better. More varied. More expensive-looking. They didn't use the cheap apartments, but apartments that looked nice, or the setting starts in a park, before they move to a nice apartment. Instead of trying to improve the videos, the site, because of covid, was trying to save money by producing cheaper videos with low-rent apartment buildings, low-rent furniture, and using a plot where you find girls and guys having sex, instead of having some interaction between the players before the sex. Bare-bones sex becomes boring after a while. And the cheap sets and cheap clothes the models wear doesn't help. I'm giving the site a score of 78. The videos from 2019 and earlier are much better to watch than the videos posted in 2020 and later. More build-up to the sex, nicer sets, they were trying to create a quality sex video, instead of mass-produced, cheap sex tapes they've been shooting starting around 2020. 03-14-22  02:46am Replies (2) Review 79 Stunning 18 (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Metart network. So you get the bells and whistles of a first rate glamour network. -You get absolutely beautiful photography. -You get a catalog of absolutely beautiful young teen (and early 20s) models. -You get unlimited streaming and downloads. -Downloads are offered in multiple definitions. -A back catalog of photosets and videos. 1656 galleries. 439 films. 533 models. Cons: -The main con is that the main Metart site is the main competitor. -Stunning 18, like all porn sites, has been hurt by the covid epidemic. They are struggling to find updates. A lot of the updates in recent months have been old content shot years ago, but posted on other sites. Avril A, a lovely teen from years ago, has 39 sets at Stunning 18 in the last 2 years, that were all shot many years ago. The sets currently being released on Stunning18 are mostly from EmasPlace.com, a softcore website that closed. That was a solo model website devoted to Avril A by Thierry Murrell. Avril A was also at Metart, Erotic Beauty, and other softcore sites. There are other models from years ago with old sets being posted at Stunning 18. But unless you've have a vast porn experience, you won't be bothered by the older sets, since they will appear new to you. And most of the models, like I say, are really cute. Bottom Line: Metart is probably the best softcore teen glamcore site in the internet. For several differnt reasons: Read my review of Metart, or other fine reviews of Metart at the PU site. But basically, -Metart has probably the largest collection of photosets of softcore glamcore on the internet. -Over 23,000 photo sets. -Over 1,800 films. (Most films are boring, not worth watching. But that's a common problem with softcore films. No matter how attractive the model is, and some of these models are the most beautiful in the world, the scenes lack heat or excitement.) -The fastest update rate for any softcore photo site I've ever seen. 4 daily updates, plus 6 updates on the first day of the month. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Photos offered from 270p through 1080p for most sets. They started offering 4K a few years back. -The same low membership price as other fine softcore site. If you can get this for the same price, with so much more value, why not get the most for your money: if you want softcore glamour, go for Metart. So that's why Stunning 18 only deserves a 90. Because it's up against Metart, which is far superior. Even though Stunning 18 is an excellent site. Stunning 18 has fine models. The girls are cute to lovely to fucking gorgeous. And Stunning 18 has one advantage over Metart: it can have a harder edge to the photos and videos. I saw one video recently with 2 girls and a naked guy, titled "Anastasia - Helping Threesome", I suspect this video was shot for a either a competing site or a generic porn producer and posted at Stunning 18 for an update, because the film quality doesn't seem up to the Stunning 18 standards. But then again, maybe it's my eyes that don't see that well, because I have cataracts, and the images aren't as clear and crisp as they used to be. Sorry to intrude personal details, but the truth is, when I look at some videos, they aren't as crisp and clear as they used to be, and the effect is noticeable. Having said that, the camera-work in this video of 2 girls and a guy is not up to the professional standards of Stunning 18. And the set is slightly cheap. And the background music is cheap. So I think this is a rental video, or a purchased video, from some porn company. They are using filler to provide more updates. Stunning 18 tries to provide value. If you didn't have fine sites like Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy in competition, I would join Stunning 18 right away. But these other sites are the same price as Stunning 18, and they offer far more content. So I would join these other sites, before I joined Stunning 18. Even though I think Stunning 18 is an excellent site. 03-09-22  06:42am Replies (0) Review 80 Pure Taboo (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Time network. One of the best bargains in porn today. The Adult Time network has over 55,000 videos. Most of them quality hardcore videos. -Wait for a holiday special, and you can get a discounted price. Either for Pure Taboo, or one of the satellite sites of Adult Time, which gives you access to the entire network. -In my opinion, Pure Taboo is the finest story-driven taboo porn site on the internet. They pay attention to the plots, the acting, the videography. The videos are darkly illuminated, by choice, to increase the creepiness of the videos. These are cinematic quality porn videos. You've probably seen glamcore videos which elevated porn videos to an art. The Pure Taboo videos can, at times, give you an artistic vision of perverted porn. Cons: -There is so much content at Adult Time (the parent network of Pure Taboo), that it can be difficult to find the porn that's exciting to watch. -Some memberships are streaming only. A yearly membership includes downloading privileges, but many PU members only want a short term membership. -Membership pricing options can be confusing. Also, if you want the best prices, wait for holiday specials to sign up: there are plenty of holiday specials for different sites in the Adult Time network: if you join any one of the satellite network sites, you get access to the entire network, as far as I can tell. But make sure you understand whether you are getting downloading privileges, or only streaming privileges. For some PU members, this can be a valuable difference. Bottom Line: The site theme is the dark side of porn. Porn that breaks taboos. One problem with this theme of breaking taboos is that it's no longer fresh. Fake incest (sex between step-relatives) is a popular niche. Interracial sex is another popular niche. A black guy sticking his dick into a white woman is covered in many different porn sites. A grandpa fucking a sweet young thing is also covered by many porn sites. Less common is a grandma getting fucked by a young guy, but there are sites that cover even that. The Pure Taboo channel at Adult Time offers one of the best story-driven porn sites in the internet. Pure Taboo, in theory, covers porn that breaks taboos, but it does such a better job, with better plots and better acting, that puts most taboo sites to shame. If you want to watch dirty porn, the Pure Taboo videos can give you the creeps. Not all the videos at Pure Taboo are great. They can have clunkers. Scenes or actresses that don't work. But they also have some videos that are truly creepy. "Needing Daddy's Seed", posted August 15th, 2019, starring: John Strong and Kenna James, is a classic Pure Taboo video. The video opens with John Strong masturbating to daddy/daughter porn on his laptop. His step-daughter, Kenna James, knocks at the door and wants to talk to him. So John Strong closes the laptop and hides the tissues and lets her into the room to talk. Kenna thanks John for being such a wonderful step-father, but tells him something is missing. They don't feel like a real family. John is happy that Jenna loves him, and offers to adopt Jenna, if that will make her even happier. But Jenna confesses that's not what she needs: she wants to start a real family with John: she wants him to get her pregnant. John is stunned: She is his step-daughter. How could they have sex? That's taboo. (You'd think this would be stupid, but the actors are doing such a fine acting job, and Kenna is such a sweet-looking young woman, you think, "Let me at her: I'd fuck her in a minute!"). And then Jenna tells John she knows he lusts for her. She knows he watches porn videos of step families. And that if John and Jenna have sex, they can have fun and excitement, and maybe she will get pregnant. John's reluctance crumbles. He takes her into his arms, and they have a wonderful fuck. The plot sounds simple. But it's wonderfully acted. And Jenna is such a luscious young babe, you wish it was you on top of her. When I start to watch videos at 21 Sextreme, a different site at Adult Time, I think: why am I wasting time with crap? Let me watch something good. Something exciting. And I find an excellent video at Pure Taboo. Which is much better than most of what I will find at 21 Sextreme. Pure Taboo videos are better than 21 Sextreme videos. The plots are better written, the acting is more professional, more believable, the videos appear crisper and more vivid. There are plenty of clunkers in the Pure Taboo videos. But also some great scenes. The "Blind Suprise" video with Ricky Johnson & Chloe Cherry. Posted at Pure Taboo on 2018-01-09. A young black creep takes advantage of a blind teen virgin and gets her cherry. The virgin is Chloe Cherry, a slight blonde that does a fucking great job playing the blind girl. And Ricky Johnson is excellent as the young black man taking advantage of the blind girl. The video is creepy, horrifying, and thrilling as well. And sexy. This is cinematic porn. An instant classic. I'm giving Pure Taboo a score of 95. Since you get access to the Adult Time network, the score doesn't matter: access to Adult Time makes the membership equivalent to membership in any other site in the network, or to the main network itself. Except that, if you can join through the main network, at the lowest price, that's probably the best option. In case the satellite channel you joined through is closed down for some reason, and your membership has a problem. Which seems doubtful, but why do they legally separate memberships for each site/channel in the Adult Time network from each other? 03-09-22  04:02am Replies (0) Review 81 Her Limit (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -They recently did an update for the homepage of LetsDoeIt network. (Her Limit is part of the LetsDoeIt network). The homepage now shows: Latest Releases Popular this week Recently active pornstars Browse LetsDoeIt top categories Special Partner Deals(Which is a listing of ads for other porn sites) -Since Her Limit is a channel in the Lets Doe It network, you get access to all 18 channels in the network. -You have unlimited streaming for videos. -You have unlimited downloads for photosets. However, the photosets are not worth collecting, in my opinion. A photoset of a video has around 10-12 photos. Which seems strange. Many of these models are cute or even gorgeous. They certainly deserve a full-sized photoset. The photoset downloads in a zip file with only one definition, and with a generic file name, such as "6227d0474fa1b.zip". Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -You have a choice for downloading a video: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p. There is no 4K option. Which seems strange for the network that started out as a glamour network. I mean, even hardcore porn sites are now mainly offering 4K. Don't misunderstand: this network was hardcore from the start, but what I mean is that even low-quality porn sites, as well as high quality porn site, are offering 4K. So why isn't this network offering it? You're supposed to keep up with the competition, unless something is wrong. CONS(START OF): -When you log in to the site, you get a page full of ads, before you get to the member's area. The ads are for competing sites. The ads don't immediately show you the join price. You have to click on the ad for any site, to see what the join price is. Note: it might be might my slow wifi connection that does not allow the prices to be shown. After a few minutes, a few of the ads do show a reduced membership price. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): So you're wasting a lot of time, if you want to check out these ads. -The ads have a "limited time offer" banner for each ad. Creating a false sense of urgency. Get real. Or get smart. How many lies do you want to swallow, after you paid for a membership, before you're allowed to get to the content you paid for? -The ads will give you a slightly discounted membership price from the "listed" price. But you can find much better discounts if you wait for holiday specials and seach a little. -You click past the full-page-of-ads to get to the membership pages: And the each membership page has ads at the bottom of the page. Plus, you also get a large pop-up window that is another ad for a "LIMITED TIME OFFER" to another site. Did I pay for a membership to a porn site? Or did I really pay for a membership where I can browse ads for other porn sites? -Pre-paid cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -The model page is very limited. It has a thumbnail of the model, plus links to her videos at the network. The bio section lists her name, birthdate, nationality, body type, boob size, ass size. And that's it. -There's a download limit of 100 videos per month, for the entire network. Any download from any one of the chanels counts towards the limit. Which is very restrictive. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site theme: extreme sex. The models are usually attractive. The sex often features anal penetration. The man is the aggressor, grabbing the bitch's hair, shoving his dick down her throad, ramming his dick into her pussy and ass. And she moans and screams with passion, because he's such a brute. Women like to be spanked. It's in their DNA. And these men are masters of the universe, who know exactly how to treat women. The chanel has 186 scenes. Watch them all, and you, too, will learn to dominate women in your bedroom, or even in public, as long as you're wearing your Captain Universe Cape and Power Ring. Don't wear the cape and ring, and you might get arrested for indecent behavior. You can like or dislike the scenes, save them as favorites. Unlimited streaming. But downloads are limited to 100 per month for the entire network. Which seems restricted. The channel updates with 1 new video every 1 or 2 weeks. Which is slow. Because of the 100 video per month limit download for the network, and the slow update rate, I would advise against a long term membership. Basically, you're wasting your money. At one time I really enjoyed the network. But the update rate has slowed in the last couple of years, and they've imposed the limit for video downloads per month to 100. And they don't offer 4K definition. Truthfully, I don't use 4K, because my equipment can't use it. But it just seems like the network is not moving to a competitive position with regards to what other porn sites are offering. So I think the channel (and the network) is not worth a long term join. If you're really into extreme sex, I think there are sites that will give you more value for your money. 03-09-22  01:45am Replies (0) Review 82 Heavy Handfuls (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Note: if you join Heavy Handfuls directly, you pay a high price. $119.95/year, or $29.95/month. Joining NewSensations.com directly, you pay $95/year, or $29.95/month. I'd wait for a holiday special, when prices often drop to $60/year, or a lower monthly fee if you don't want to join for a long term membership. That is for joining through New Sensations, which has a cheaper price than joining Heavy Handfuls, even though both memberships give you access to the same sites and same network. -Part of the New Sensations network, with over 7,500 videos of good quality. -Site features women with large breasts. Some of the breasts seem natural, others are obvious boob jobs. -The sex videos at Heavy Handfuls give you slightly more plot than the average video at New Sensations, but that's not saying much. For example, a guy just broke up with his girlfriend, the stepmother offers sympathy, and then she's jumping on top of him on the couch, within the first three minutes of the video. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): So one minute of sympathy, one minute of walking him to the couch, then, BAM!, she shoving her tongue down his mouth and pulling back to push her dress down to bare her huge breasts, while the guy is still gulping for air. But then he starts sucking her breasts, those huge, massive titties, and it's off to the races. Who needs plot when the porn world gives you these true-to-life scripts? If you're a breast fan, this site is for you. -I don't think the New Sensations network, or this site, gives you a lot of bells and whistles in the technical department. But New Sensations gives the same layout to all the sites I've seen so far. -You get unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading. -You get quality videos: mainly A-list models, attractive to very attractive, good colors and good lighting, nice sets, Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): a lot of sex. They try to vary the minimal plots, settings, models, costumes, for variety. CONS(START OF): -I don't think there are any serious cons. -If you can get a cheap price for the network, I think you get your money's worth. But join during a holiday special for $60/year. And join through the New Sensations network. If you join through one of the included sites, your membership does not give you anything more than a regular New Sensations membership, but you might be charged a higher price. -You get at least one pre-checked cross-sale on the join page, you might find a second pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. I uncheck them, for different reasons: Most of the pre-checked cross-sales are for sites I don't need a trial member to. All these short-term trial memberships, after 2 or 3 days, turn into an expensive monthly membership that is far higher than you would pay normally. -There are ads for competing sites on every member page. Some of the ads are for low prices, that might be worth joining. I've seen ads for $5 for the first month of Metart, which is the lowest price I've ever seen for Metart, a fine softcore glamour site. But I already have a lifetime membership to Metart. -Boredom from watching too much porn that you don't enjoy. Finding enough porn that you really enjoy can be a problem. Much of the porn at this site, and the network, can seem plain-vanilla, after you watch too much. But that's true at most porn sites. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): If you wait for a holiday special, when you can join for $60/yearly, or for a low monthly price through New Sensations, is a worthwhile join. I think you get more than your money's worth with some enjoyable porn. For some reason, if you join through one of the satellite sites (a site that is part of New Sensations, and gives you the same access to the same sites), you might pay a higher price. That's just the way some networks work. I'd hate to pay $120 for a year's membership, and then find that I could have had it for $60 during a holiday special if I got the same access through a different portal. Let me re-phrase that: you can pay $120 to access a network. Or you can pay $60 for the same access. It can depend on when you purchase the membership. And through which portal. Technically, a membership in Heavy Handfuls is not the same as a membership in New Sensations. But both memberships give you the same privileges: access to the same sites. I've had this difference pointed out to me with a membership in a Wow network site and also a membership to 21 Sextury (part of the Adult Time network). It's a technical or legal difference, that on a practical level, doesn't seem to matter, as far as I can tell. Except that it probably does matter, in certain circumstances, or they wouldn't make such a big deal about it. Bottom line: access to Heavey Handfuls is a great thing is you're a fan of big-breasts. And even if you don't think big breasts are the greatest, it's still worth glancing through the videos to find what you can enjoy. Some of the plots (even though they are mainly minimal) can be interesting: you wonder how much better the video would be if they put more thought into the writing and acting. But these are basically good quality videos: the videos are professionally shot, good sets, good camera-work, mainly attractive models, good lighting and sound control. And you get access to over 7500 videos, with your network membership. So I think it's worth more than $60/year. Note: Maybe I'm paying too much attention to price. But the link to Heavy Handfuls from PU (and TBP) leads to a join page at Heavy Handfuls that currently shows: $119.95/year $29.95/month PU (and TBP) shows $119.95/year $14.95/month Maybe Heavy Handfuls changes their prices once in a while. But check to see what price you're paying. It pays to check. 03-06-22  09:55pm Replies (2) Review 83 The Lesbian Experience (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Updated: 03-06-22  12:19pm  (Update History) Reason: Membership price increased. That is important. Pros: NOTE: prices went up after I joined. Now costs around $95/year, or $30/month. Very expensive compared to what I paid. -The Lesbian Experience is a site in the New Sensations network. -There are no premium sites in the New Sensations network that you have to pay extra for. All sites are included. -Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. For all sites in the network. -Navigation is simple for the site and the network. Can arrange the site videos chronologically or alphabetically. -Starting in 2018, the site offered 4K definition. The 4K definition is offered in multiple bit rates. Before 2017, all videos were offered in 720p and 1080p, in multiple bit rates. -The videos are mainly sex scenes, but there are also interview videos, where the models talk about getting into porn, how long they've been in porn, a slight bit about personal history. Some members consider the interview videos boring, but I like to watch them to see if the models show a tiny amount of personality. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -The models are mainly A-list porn stars, that you've seen on many different porn sites. Almost all are attractive to extremely attractive. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor. -This is a niche site, focusing on lesbian sex. If you're not into lesbian sex, the site will hold little interest, in spite of the very attractive models. -Watching these videos can destroy your faith in human nature. You will come across scenes where married women (women married to a guy, women married to a girl), will have sex with a different woman, breaking the bonds of holy matrimony. Not only will these lesbian sluts have illicit sex, but they will do it with moans and groans of sexual ecstasy. -Also, I've watched some of these same women who are admitted lesbians, have sex with men on other sites. That is a crime that I don't even know what to call it. -There are ads on every member page. Standard for porn sites. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): There is a second pre-checked cross-sale on another join page. -This is just personal opinion, but many models seem pressured to have surgeries to enhance their physical appearance. I prefer a natural look with less surgical scarring and less botox-enhanced lips/whatever. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): If you're in the mood for lesbian sex, The Lesbian Experience seems like a good place to visit. -It's low-cost membership fee is attractive: $60/year. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Quality videos, up to 4K starting in 2018. Nice sets, good colors and lighting, attractive models. The scenes have minimal plots: there's a tiny amount of seduction, and then the sex. You're supposed to think that all attractive women are horny as hell. On the negative side, the update rate is irregular, like many of the New Sensations sites. The last update was 10/31/2021, an interview video. So I don't know if this is an archive site with no more updates, or just another site with very irregular updates. 145 videos. Most are sex scenes, but some are interviews with the models. The videos all have 720p and 1080p definitions offered, with multiple bit rates. Starting in 2018, they offered a 4K definition for the videos. Also, with multiple bit rates. Since I have a slow wifi connection, I stream with the lowest definition, for less pauses. I shouldn't have to do this, because the computer and devices I use report my wifi connection should be fast enough to stream without pauses, but in the real world, the fucking videos pause all the time while streaming. The best way to get around this is to download the videos and watch from the downloaded video file on my PC. It's good to watch a couple of cute lezzies fooling around, kissing, hugging, snuggling, cuddling before they get down to serious sex. The background music shouldn't be too distracting, and the camera-work should be steady and calm, not jerky or out of focus. The Lesbian Experience gives good quality videos, not a lot of plot, but if the models are cute and in the mood, it makes for good porn. 03-06-22  07:07am Replies (0) Review 84 Ashlynn Brooke (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Ashlynn Brooke.com is a site in the New Sensations network. Join New Sensations, and you get access to the entire network. No premium sites you have to pay extra for. Or join any one of the included sites, and you get access to the entire New Sensations network. -Unlimited downloads and unlimited streaming. -You can create a favorites list of videos. -Navigation is basically simple. It's a small site, only 101 videos (plus a photoset for each video). You can arrange the scenes chronologically, or alphabetically by title. -The scenes are professionally shot: nice sets, good lighting, good camera-work, good colors, good sound control. So the scenes are good quality. But since the last update was back in 2014, the definitions are only offered in 720p and 1080p, which might be a turn-off for some viewers. Cons: -The main con is the site stopped updating years ago. Probably around 2014. -Ashlynn Brooke is a cute blonde with a pretty face and large breasts (enhanced, but not as obviously fake as some bolt-ons I've seen). The videos at the site were made from DVDs. Videos were posted at the site from 07/09/2008 through 05/26/2014. -The update rate was very irregular. I guess they added a new video when they felt like it. -This is a small site. 101 scenes plus a photoset for each scene. -The site is called the "official site" of Ashlynn Brooke, "featuring my personal videos and photosets". But the personal videos are from DVDs of Ashlynn Brooke, not homemade personal videos of Ashlynn that a fan might be hoping for. And the photosets are almost certainly screenshots from the DVD scenes, not from a professional photographer who was shooting the model. Bottom Line: This is a small site dedicated to a solo model, Ashlynn Brooke. Scenes (videos) are offered in 720p and 1080p, with each definition offered in 2 or 3 bit rates. There is a photoset that offers a partial record of the video. I believe the photosets are made from screenshots of the video, not by a professional photographer shooting individual photos. So the photos are not as crisp and clear as a good photo can be. Photosets range from 30 to 180 photos per set. Unless you're a fan of Ashlynn Brooke, I don't think the photosets are worth collecting. Scenes have minimal plots. A guy is licking and caressing Ashlynn Brooke and he fucks her in different positions, and she gets in some cocksucking at different times. Or Ashlynn Brooke is with a woman, and they are making out and then having sex. The two women might talk for a minute or two or even three, but then they start touching each other, and you know where that leads to. Or Ashlynn Brooke is with two guys, and they start to have sex. She tries to keep it interesting, by changing her costumes, changing her partners. She's a very pretty woman, but the sex gets to be monotonous after a while. And since this is an archive site, there are no new updates since 2014. I don't think Ashlynn Brooke, the model, ever participated at the site personally. All the site offered was scenes from Ashlynn Brooke DVDs, and the accompanying photosets. There was no personal participation, such as a blog, where she answered fan mail, or posted her thoughts or ideas. Since you're a member of the New Sensations network, and this is one of the included sites, you can browse the scenes, to see how much you enjoy them. But I think the site is mainly for Ashlynn Brooke fans. 03-05-22  06:32pm Replies (0) Review 85 Fresh Outta High School (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network, a low cost ($60/year) network of quality videos and photosets. -The short text description of the video is a fine summary of the plot. -Easy to switch between the sites in the network. -I don't know why, but looking at the nice-sized thumbnails of the models laying on their backs, or crouching with their ass sticking up in the air, is enough to give you a hard-on, even before you get to the video. Some of these teen models are fucking attractive. -Watching these videos is a wonderful guide on how to treat young women. Be a man and be strong, so you can give her the hardest cock she's ever tasted, and ram it deep into her tight young holes. -The good-looking models are always so enthusiastic and verbal about the joys of fucking. Possibly a little over-the-top, but it gives me hope that I can find some cuties to satisfy my needs. -The school uniforms the girls wear (plaid skirt, white blouse), brings back memories of the Catholic school girls. Cons: -You find a video at New Sensations network, it's not immediately apparent which site the video belongs to. -The title of the site is "FreshOuttaHighSchool". But some models look like in their early 20s. You graduate from high school at 17 or 18. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -I don't think the plots are 100% accurate to real-life situations. In the videos, lovely young girls are always coming on to older men to satisfy their sexual urges. In real life, it seems to me that young girls are not always so willing and able to have sex without some urging on the part of the male partners. -Very little information is given about the models. You get a nice, extra-large thumbnail of the model to see what she looks like, but no bio or personal data other than height and measurements (height-chest-hips). -Maybe it's my slow wifi connection, but the video streaming was spotty, with lots of pauses while streaming videos. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -I wish some of the cuties would make more than one appearance at the site. Riley Reid, Bailey Brooke, and other cuties deserve to be showcased more often, so we can appreciate their lovely bodies and fine acting skills. -The default file name lists the model, but you need to add the date posted, site, and any other data you need. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The site is a nice addition to the New Sensations network. The site theme is young girls having sex. Often with older men. The older men are usually hesitant to have sex with the girls. The girls are young and attractive, so I don't know why the older men are so hesitant. Also, the young girls are uniformly cute or attractive, but they are also so horny, that as soon as the men touch them, the girls start moaning and screaming and shouting they are going to come. Is that the way it happens in real life? Enquiring minds want to know: are the videos at New Sensations teaching us to behave properly in the real world, or are these videos fantasies from perverted male minds? I was brought up to believe we should always give the benefit of the doubt to people, when there is a question of honor. So I think that New Sensations is giving us videos that will teach us to behave honorably towards women, to give women what they've always secretly craved: a good, stiff cock right where it counts. The older videos have 720p and 1080p definitions for streaming and downloading, but 4K was not introduced until 2018. The streaming have 2 choices for bit rates. The older downloads might only have 1 choice for bit rates. But many downloads have multiple choices for bit rates, for each definition offered. The videos and photosets have fine technical qualities and are a pleasure to watch: nice sets, excellent colors and lighting, professional camera-work, attractive models, good sound control, etc. The main factor, after checking to see that the videos are good technical quality, is how cute or attractive are the models. The models at FreshOuttaHighSchool (and at New Sensations network) are scrumptious. There are plenty of models to drool over. Cute, attractive, lovely, there are plenty of good-looking young women that should appeal to you. The main selling points of the site: -low membership price: $60/year. -high quality videos and photosets. -access to the New Sensations network, of 7,500+ scenes. -Thousands of A-list pornstars that are attractive. -Easy site and network navigation. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. 03-05-22  06:40am Replies (0) Review 86 Hegre (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Download managers are allowed, but please configure them to open one stream only to the server at the same time or your account will be blocked automatically. I rarely use a download manager, so this isn't a problem. -Username and password are case sensitive. I copy and paste username and password, so no problem. -No pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Very unusual for a porn site. -CCBill was the default biller. An excellent biller. Never had a problem with them. Cancelling my membership should be easy. -Access to the site is automatic, with no login needed, if you have cookies enabled. -The technical features for viewing a photo or a photoset online are amazing: you can easily enlarge the photo by small percentages, and view portions of a single photo in detail. The best site for viewing photosets online I've seen so far. With amazingly beautiful models. The problem is that the photos seem so sterile. These are softcore glamcore photosets, but to me, they are non-erotic. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Movies have a trailer, if you want a preview of the video. -Photographs are clear, crisp images, excellent colors and lighting, but surprisingly sterile, non-erotic, even though the images are of very lovely nude women. I don't know why the site is so unappealing for me. The models are uniformly gorgeous. CONS(START OF): -Comments (on photosets and videos) are allowed, but they are moderated. Unconstructive remarks or insulting/derogatory language or html links will be deleted. Many of the comments I've seen so far are not worth reading. -In spite of the lovely models, a defect of the site is the over-use of the main photographer, Petter Hegre. He can lack imagination in his photos. Metart and many other glamour sites use a combination of contributing photographers, so you get different styles and ideas. Whereas at Hegre, the photosets can start to seem repetitious, in spite of the physical beauty of the models. Bottom Line: -It's been many years since I was a member of Hegre. The site has many of the most beautiful models in the world. What is different from Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy or other fine glamour photo sites? Nothing much, as far as I can tell. All these sites (and others) feature gorgeous women stunningly photographed. I'm not a connoisseur: I just enjoy looking at fine-looking women. -The main value of any glamour porn site is the model listing: how attractive are the models? The models at Hegre are among the most attractive women on the planet. If you're into fine looking women ages 18 to early 30s, this site has plenty of models that are worth viewing. I'm looking at hannah, a white, slender model born April 1999, which would make her 22 years old. She is fucking gorgeous. She has 6 galleries and 2 movies at Hegre. The photosets can be repetitious. Hannah has 6 photosets. In 5 of them she is completely nude, from start to finish. In one set she starts off wearing a black top, black pants, black shoes and black socks. The main difference of the 5 completely nude sets is: 1 set has a floor and a wall, and is empty of anything except the naked model. A second set with a floor and wall, empty of anything except the naked model. A third set with a floor and a wall(the wall is different in this set, a brick facade), and the floor is different (a wood floor), but the set is empty of anything except the naked model. 1 set has a rectangular pad, that the model can sit on, stand on, lean on. 1 set has a chair, that she can sit on or lean on or ignore the chair. The 5 sets seem to have been shot in a hurry, with the model told to assume different poses in a minimal setting, with little or no thought to artistic expression or showmanship or anything: just minimal photos of a lovely young girl, but interest fades slowly or quickly, when you realize that's all there is. Which is a wasted opportunity of this model. She deserves better. Looking at the photosets at Hegre, I realize, anew, that I appreciate my Metart photosets so much better. Metart presents lovely women in a variety of interesting, softcore poses. I can spend hours looking at some Metart sets, while I quickly get bored looking at a Hegre photoset (even if the Hegre model is just as lovely as the Metart model). There's more variety in the Metart photos compared to the Hegre photos. And I begin to realize why it's been years since I re-joined the Hegre site: Out of four leading softcore glamour sites (Metart, MPL Studios, Femjoy, Hegre), I rank Hegre at the bottom. All 4 sites have a collection of lovely young models. But the Hegre photosets are the least interesting of the 4 sites. That's my personal opinion, of course. But I've been a member of all 4 sites many times, and I've seen most of their photosets, and the only site I've joined with a lifetime membership is Metart, of those 4 sites (I have a lifetime membership to Sexart and The Life Erotic, part of the Metart network, but Metart is the only one of those 3 sites that I visit regularly.) -Download options for a photoset at Hegre are: (sample size for a photoset of 56 photos): Mega Size Edition | 14000px, 182 MB Super Size Edition | 10000px, 155 MB Large Size Edition | 6000px, 39 MB Collectors Edition | 3000px, 12 MB Quick View Edition | 1200px, 2.8 MB -Download options for a movie are: Downloads 4K Ultra HD 2160p video | 3840x2160, 1.9 GB Full HD 1080p video | 1920x1080, 969 MB HD 720p video | 1280x720, 395 MB SD 480p video | 848x480, 256 MB SD 360p video | 640x360, 144 MB SD 240p video | 416x240, 93 MB The photography at Hegre is wonderfully crisp and clear, and the site has the best software for examining the photos in detail or in a slideshow. Most photosets feature a model who is completely nude from start to finish. And the set for the model is on is minimal: you have a model, and an empty room. Or maybe there is a chair in the room. Or maybe there is a mattress in the room. That's it. Is it lack of imagination, or striving for minimalism? I imagine a photoshoot can be done quickly, because you tell the model to assume different poses, and shoot her quickly. My reaction is to quickly lose interest, no matter how lovely or attractive the model can be. I find the content at Metart, MPL Studios, and Femjoy is far more interesting and worthwhile viewing. They are constantly adding new models to their catalog. Almost all models are slender, white European teens (or early 20s). The site has videos. The videos feature female masturbation, lesbian, some videos with a guy getting a hand massage on his penis. Newer videos have 480p, 720p, 1080p, and 4K definition available. CONTINUED IN THE FIRST REPLY BELOW: 03-04-22  12:32pm Replies (2) Review 87 Hot Wife XXX (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network. A large network with over 7500 scenes. -Large site. 506 videos. -One-year membership is only $60. Low price for a quality site and network. -Navigation is easy. Can switch between network sites easily, without needing to re-login. -Nice search engine. You can search within a site, or within the network. Search by model's name, etc. -You can add videos to your favorite list. -Can comment on each video. Cons: -I think the cons are basically minor. This is a nice site, a nice network. -You have 506 videos. Most of the videos are sex videos. But some (a minor percentage) are interviews of the models. Some members might think the model interviews are boring. But I thought it was a chance to see the models talk a bit about themselves. The models answer questions about how they got into porn, how long they've been in porn, a tiny bit about themselves. Many of the models state they've only been in porn for less than one year. -The site theme seems dated. Maybe I'm jaded, but the story-line of a woman having sex with someone not her husband does not add a lot of excitement to the plot. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Most videos don't have many comments by members. And the comments I've read are mostly not worth reading. Bottom Line: HotwifeXXX features wives who get off on sex outside of their marriage. Who believes that in today's world, if you get married, your partner won't cheat on you? Maybe I've been watching too much porn to believe that sex outside of marriage will send you straight to hell. But these videos show women women having sex with strangers. The sex can be with a guy or a girl. So girl-girl sex could be an extra thrill. I mean, if you have sex outside of marriage, according to the bible, you could be stoned to death. And if a married woman has sex with a woman, that's double grounds for stoning to death. The videos often portray the husband allowing his wife to have sex with someone else. I guess that not only does the wife get a thrill from illicit sex, but the husband also gets a thrill from knowing his wife enjoys sex with other people. This site teaches you that people have many perversions. So joining the site will broaden your mind. There is a photoset that accompanies each sex video (but not the interview videos). The photoset has about 151 photos. The photos are good quality (not low-quality screenshots). So if you like the model and the sex video, you can collect the photosets. The photoset zip file downloads with the name of the model, but you need to manually add the title of the video, the date posted, and the site. The zip file comes in only one definition, which is large. Photos are 5760x3840. Each photo is around 5 MB. With around 151 photos per set, the average photoset takes up 768 MB, which is a lot of space. So I recommend only keeping the sets you really enjoy. Video runtime for the sex videos run 20 to 40 minutes. Each video comes with a short text file that is supposed to tell you the plot. I don't think the writers that are supposed to summarize the plot bother to watch the videos. The writer knows that a girl is supposed to have sex, so he makes up a story about a girl having sex. The story doesn't match the video's plot. The written text file story often has details that aren't shown or told in the voice-over that plays with the video. So the short text file summary is worthless. The sex videos are well videotaped, nice colors, nice settings, the models are usually very attractive, but the writers that are supposed to summarize the video plot make up their own stories, instead of watching the videos. I guess they are bored with porn, and don't want to spend the time it takes to watch these videos. The staff that run the site should check that the text stories match the plot of the video. It should be very easy for the text writers to read the script of the video, and make a summary. Based on the quality of the videos, which have excellent technical features (good settings, nice colors for the film, attractive models), and the choices for downloading or streaming the videos, plus the low membership cost ($60/year), I highly recommend the site and the network. 03-04-22  01:35am Replies (0) Review 88 Brutal X (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Dirty Flix network. -The network has over 1500 videos, and about 14 sites. -All the sites are available with a basic membership. No premium sites, no extra charge for downloads. The Brutal X site has 41 videos. -The videos have a posting date for when they are added to the site. -Navigation is simple and easy. A small site of 41 videos, so you would expect to be able to scan all the videos easily. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. Cons: -Somehow, the dirtyflix.com site has both a secure and a non-secure page to login. When you login through the non-secure page, you can see a popup on your browser that warns you the page is not secure, and is liable for hacking. -Most of the time, the member pages are non-secure. But there might be member pages that are secure. I don't understand how a site can have both secure and non-secure login pages. -Slow update rate. The site was started around Oct 2015, and only has 41 videos. So in 6 years and a few months, they've added 41 videos, which works out to 1 new video if they remember about the site. The most recent video was posted on Mar 8, 2021. So the site might be an archive site. Or, if they remember to start posting again, just another example of forgetting to post new videos. -There is no PU discount for site membership. The listed price is $120/year, or $30/month. But if you wait for a holiday special (given throughout the year), you can join for $60/year. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The public page was updated last year with larger, brighter thumbnails to illustrate some of the network videos. But the member pages need the thumbnails to be updated as well: larger, brighter thumbnails to illustrate what the models look like: most of the models are attractive, which is the main draw of the site and network, so they need to show the models attractively, to draw customers in. -The plots of Brutal X are simple but effective: a Russian man wants to teach a woman to be a woman, and rough sex is the best teacher. An American man wants to teach a woman a lesson, and he uses rough sex to teach her. But Russians have the advantage, because they know how to treat a woman. While Americans are less sure, and it takes a while before they realize that brutal sex is the answer to a woman's dreams. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Note: The Brutal X review at The Best Porn was posted in 2016, and has not been updated. That review states that a membership in Brutal X gives you access to Brutal X, without any bonus content. Since that time, Brutal X has been merged into the Dirty Flix network, which has around 14 sites you get access to. Also, the Brutal X video count has increased from 10 to 41. Site stats: Videos: 41 Update rate: very slow. Last update was Mar 8, 2021. Before that, they posted 1 video per month, on average. -Video runtime is 20 to 30 minutes. -All the videos, even the earliest, are available in low, medium, high, and 4K definition. Site theme: brutal sex. With a title of "Brutal X", you expect over-the-top brutal fucking. Which is not quite what you get. I've seen sites where the fucking was over the top, harsh, brutal, and the women were screaming in pain. This is porn I'm talking about, so the screams were probably fake. And the sex would have been consensual, or it would be illegal. Brutal over-the-top videos seem to show over-the-top brutality of one or more guys banging away on a woman, pulling her arms, slapping her face, ass, titties, pussy, jamming his/their cock(s) into the woman's mouth, pussy, ass, twisting her into painful positions, etc. during the fuck. The fuck seems more like torture than sex. But that's not the case at Brutal X. This is where sweet, young innocent babes in nice dresses parade in front of young handsome stunt cocks who want to dominate these young pussies. So the stunt cocks grab the girl's ass, gropes her tits, the girl is fighting the guy because he's coming on too strong, the background music is blaring away to heighten the tension, the girl drops to the floor, the guy pulls out his cock (a sign of male aggression common in porn), the girl opens her mouth (Russian women have an instinct to open their mouth when they see a dick waving in front of their face), and the guy shoves his dick into the open mouth. The girl is making noises (uuuhhhh, oooohhhhh, aaaaahhhhhh) that are not excitement but rejection, but the strong, powerful stunt cock ignores her resistance and treats her like the sex doll she was meant to be. Russian men are my heroes: they know instinctively how women want to be treated. The next time I go to the mall and find a good-looking teen, I will jump over all her while I listen to her moans and groans of excitement. And if anyone in the crowd objects, I will show them the tapes that prove I was only exercising my manly rights. Power to the male animal inside of all us red-blooded American men (who are really pussies compared to Russian men). Actually, during the sex action I've seen at this site, the woman's moans turn softer, and maybe she's starting to enjoy the sex. I sure hope so, since the guy seems to be going all out, sticking his cock and fingers into the woman's mouth, slapping her ass, her face, sticking his cock into the woman's pussy, trying to blow his wad while giving the woman the best fuck of her life. And that all takes place in the first 3 or 4 minutes. After that, what's left? After all, the video runtime is 20 to 30 minutes. So, it's more of the same. More slapping, fucking, moaning, cocksucking, gagging (from the guy's cock buried too deep in the girl's mouth, maybe a little ass fucking for variety, the guy sticking his finger into the girl's pussy and ass and then putting it into the girl's mouth, and this continues for another 15 to 25 minutes. So both the guy and the girl get a real workout. Or a different plot might be a guy's stepsister is acting like a real bitch, so he rips her clothes off and treats her to brutal sex. As far as I'm concerned, I got the picture in the first 5 minutes or less. My reaction was: brutal sex is not my favorite niche. This site is basically boring for me. And when the sex is more brutal, at other sites, it's just a fucking turn-off for me. Other people might enjoy watching brutal sex videos. I consider this site to focus on tame brutal sex. But there are other sites that focus on rough brutal sex. Different strokes for different folks. 01-12-22  09:02am Replies (0) Review 89 Private Casting X (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Dirty Flix network. -Videos are available in 240p, 720p, 1080p. There are also a number of videos with a 4K option. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Content is exclusive for the site. -The models are teens, attractive to very attractive. -The models are girl-next-door types. They are young teens at the start of their careers (except many porn stars have a very short career, lasting a few years at best). Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The PU link to the site leads to a join of $30/month. RabbitsReviews(sister site of PU) has a link to the site of $15 for the first month. But during holiday specials, you can often find a discounted price of $60/year (for the Dirty Flix network, which includes Private Casting X). Bottom Line: -The narrator/stunt cock is a bullshit artist. First he tells the girl the interview is for a music video and she will make $2000 for a day's work. Then he says the interview is not for a music video, but for a sex tape for his private collection. And no one will ever see the tape but himself. That the girl has not signed a release form, so she is protected. Porn is fantasy, and porn shooters are bullshit artists. Pierre Woodman is another guy who lies to the models while he is taping them. A girl tells Pierre she doesn't want to be taped, he says, OK, I'm turning off the camera, and the camera keeps recording. Kind of like a used car salesman. Or the workers at AT&T who sign you up for internet or TV service, with promises that are worth shit, unless you get the promise in writing. Except the AT&T worker tells you that they don't give you a written contract when you sign up, it's all done digitally. And when you come into the office a few months later, saying you were charged for a service when you were told you wouldn't be charged, the salesperson states the original salesperson make a mistake when telling you you wouldn't be charged. And that the office no longer has a copy of the digital contract. This is true for AT&T, a major multi-billion US corporation that dates back to the 1800s. Site has cute models. The videos are crisp and clear. Navigation is easy. The videos are worth watching. 01-12-22  08:58am Replies (0) Review 90 Family XXX (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the New Sensations network, a fairly large network of around 26 separate sites. So you get access to over 7,500 hardcore porn videos. -Family XXX focuses on sex between step-relations, which I consider to be fake incest. Fake incest is one of the newest, most popular fads in porn today: who doesn't want to fuck their own (step) sister, or their own step-mother? Remember Oedipus? Incest was a popular theme even back in the time of the Greeks, before Christians wrote the Bible. -The content is exclusive. These are original videos (along with their accompanying photosets). -The videos are offered in 720p, 1080p, 4K. The 720p and 1080p definitions each have 2 different Mbps offered. -The accompanying photoset for each video is not just a photoshoot record of the video, but a separate shoot of the story, which varies from the video story. -Normally I'm not a fan of step-relation porn. But this site does an excellent job presenting the niche. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): The videos I've seen are not just watchable, but enjoyable. Arousing. The stories are credible, the acting by the models is first class, far beyond the normal cringe-worthy acting of porn models. The models themselves are mainly cute to attractive to lovely. -I guess I'm naive, but I enjoyed the Behind The Scenes videos of the models talking about themselves. The models assume a cheerful facade, and many of them, for this site, anyway, are early in their porn careers, but they basically state they are enjoying their introduction into porn. Which I hope is true, because porn can be a tough profession. -The videos are professionally made, with excellent production values: nice sets, attractive models, good scripts, excellent acting by the models, good lighting and sound control. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor. The site and the network are first class. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): There is a second pre-checked cross-sale on another join page. -The biller is a captive biller (owned by the site). But I've done business with them and was never charged any extra fees. I did have a slight problem cancelling a sub a couple of years ago. Cancellation is easier with CCBill or Epoch. -The member pages have lots of ads. But some of the ads for major sites have a low price. I saw an ad for Metart $5 for the first month. $5 for the first month to Sexart. $7 for the first month to Babes Network. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): You can join the New Sensations network for $60/year, which is a low price for a quality network. That is a holiday special. Exclusive content. Over 7,500 videos in the network. The site has 761 videos. Some of the videos are Behind The Scenes videos, which are interviews of the porn models. Thousands of photosets of good quality photos. Attractive to very attractive models. The models at the Family XXX site do an outstanding acting job. The scripts are more realistic than most incest sites, with better dialog (or, realizing that dialog is not needed, less stupid dialog). Zip file for the photosets. Nice model listing: large-sized thumbnails of the models. Listing can be sorted by newest, popular, A-Z, Z-A, Classics, Your Favorites. So navigation is easy, for the site and the network. There is a text description of the video. The text description of the video sounds like a common blurb for a regular hardcore porn video. Which is stupid. The models are putting on a good or great show, and they deserve a better write-up than treating them as cock-sucking whores. Show a little respect, or give them the recognition they deserve for putting on a good show, even if it includes cock-sucking and fucking. Porn stars are not cheap whores, even though many people confuse the two. I get more enjoyment watching some of the FamilyXXX videos than I do watching a blockbuster superhero movie: the FamilyXXX video can deliver sex that is sweeter, more urgent, than an overblown comic movie that hits you with one unbelievable scene after another. I'm giving FamilyXXX site a score of 95. Some of the videos are instant classics. They restore my faith that porn can be meaningful. Even if the premise is pure fantasy. 01-05-22  06:42am Replies (0) Review 91 Young Courtesans (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Young Courtesans is part of the Dirty Flix network. -network stats 1491+ scenes and growing 1487+ photosets 768+ models -Site has a irregular number of updates: 2 to 5 per month. -Content has a posting date. -No pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Unusual for a porn site. -Expired members get free limited access to the website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in the member zone. Which seems like a very generous policy. -15 sites in the network, covering a range of niches. -Search is good. I don't use search very much, mainly to find a model's content. Cons: -Login is not secure. You get a warning popup when you login that "This connection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised". -Note: this is strange. I have my browser opened to 2 pages of the Young Courtesans website member page. One of the pages is not secure, the other page is secure (https). So evidently there is secure web page for the site, and a non-secure web page for the site. http://members.dirtyflix.com/en/ https://members.dirtyflix.com/en/ -Payment processor is Verotel. Not as well known as other major processors. -Login details (user name, password) are computer generated. Bottom Line: Site stats: Videos: 164 Video runtime: averages around 25 minutes Photosets: 164 Photoset # of photos: average 80 photos per set photo: 2500 x 1667 pixels I don't know why, but I think that Young Courtesans is the most famous of the sites in the Dirty Flix network. I'm in my 70s, and my memory is poor. That's a personal problem. But all of these teen sites are starting to run together in my memory. Young Courtesans and Sell Your Girlfriend and Teeny Lovers and Teens Analyzed strike a chord in my memory. I've been a member of those sites over the years, and have fond memories of the Young Courtesans site, because I thought the models were attractive, the videos were sharply filmed, and the video quality was excellent. Note: I posted a comment on Young Courtesans site on 10-10-2010 at the PU site. And TBP site says Young Courtesans was launched in March 2010. The earliest posted date for the Young Courtesans site video is Jul 20, 2013. So I don't know if the site has deleted the earliest videos, or changed their posting date, because the site had videos back in 2010, or earlier. 18 Videoz network and Dirty Flix network are both owned/operated by the same company. If you want to join either one, join through the 18Videoz site or the Dirty Flix site. Joining one of the included sites can run $30/month. The listed price of Dirty Flix (and 18 Videoz) is $120/year, but holiday specials reduce the price to $60/year. So wait for a holiday special, which happens all the time. Note: you can find a link to join at $120/year and find a different link to join at $60/year, at the same time. So use a link to join at $60/year. 12-27-21  08:45am Replies (0) Review 92 1 Pass For All Sites (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -1 Pass For All Sites network is a teen oriented network with lots of cute models. -Access to 12,000+ videos, 1,250+ girls. -30 sites covering a variety of niches. Teen, old/young, lesbian, anal, creampies, virgins, MILFs, incest. -Videos have a text description of the plot. -Photosets have 100-200 photos per set. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Vendo is the billing agent I used, an excellent biller that is easy to deal with. Cons: -Low definition for a lot of these videos. Many videos are only available in 288p and 468p. -Almost all the videos at the site have no posting date. -The models speak Russian. But there are subtitles in English. This tells you what the models are saying, and shows you that the stunt cocks are not jerks, but boys who want to make sure the girl is comfortable and aroused while he strokes her tender body. Never again will I think that Russian sex is simple hardcore: Russians are warm-hearted people who specialize in fucking tender virgins. And after taking her virginity, the boy is often rewarded by a blowjob from the ex-virgin. -Slow update rate for the network. You get anywhere from 0 to 5 videos added per month. -Very few of the sites update. Most sites haven't updated in years, I'm guessing. Because most videos don't have a posting date. Bottom Line: I admit that I was wrong about Russian teens. I thought the Russian studs were the "Wham, Bam, Thank You, Ma'am" school of arrogant teens. But reading the plots of the videos, I now know that the boys and girls have tender feelings for each other, along with the sex. Note: after reading the plot descriptions, I'm not 100% sure all of these models are virgins. But it makes no difference: they are cute babes, and really enjoy fucking. OFF TOPIC(But I just watched a great video, and I think it's worth mentioning): The hottest video I've seen at New Sensations stars Amber Moore, a young blonde who seduces her stepfather, in video "Amber's Teen Pussy Is Step Daddy's Favorite". The text description for that video: "Step father Ramon is in need of a shower and discovers a broken pipe in his bathroom. So he politely asks his teenage blonde step daughter Amber if he could use her shower and of course she said no problem, what's hers is his. Amber gets bold and decides to rub her cute little teen pussy as he showers and begs to come inside with him. With that Ramon turns the water back on and slips his hard daddy cock inside her wet tight pink teen pussy and pounds her hole with balls slapping and then covering her sweet ass cheeks with hot step daddy cum." The text description doesn't do justice to the video: Amber Moore is attractive, but I've seen more beautiful models. But her face is so expressive, and her body is nice, firm, voluptuous, and the chemistry between her and her stepfather is great, and the plot and acting is fine, and Jesus, I wish it was me pounding away on that lovely flesh. That's the best video I've seen at that network. It's borderline glamcore. The sets are nice, but not expensive. No romantic background music. Just a video of young girl's fantasy of sex with her stepfather. Amber Moore does a great job of a girl having her first sexual encounter with her stepfather. The video is an instant classic. Maybe I'm going overboard, but in my opinion, that video, by itself, is worth the membership price to New Sensations. You can get an annual membership to New Sensations for $60, which is a low cost to a fine network. Very few videos will match the quality, the impact, of the "Amber's Teen Pussy Is Step Daddy's Favorite" video. BACK ON TOPIC(The review for 1 Pass For All Sites network): I'm giving the 1 Pass For All Sites network a 93 score. The network features cute teens who are eager to fuck. You get access to 12,000+ videos, 1,250+ girls, from the network's 30 sites. A score of 93 means I think, if you like hardcore teen sites, this network is definitely worth joining. 12-27-21  07:46am Replies (0) Review 93 Tricky Old Teacher (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. Membership in any one site gives you access to all the sites. -30 sites in the network, covering a wide variety of niches. The main theme is teens. -Unlimited streaming -Unlimited downloads -Video definition offered in 360p through 2160p. -The site has 255 videos. Plus matching photosets. Cons: -Slow update rate. Site averages less than 1 new video per month. -Slow, irregular update rate for the network: anywhere from 0 to 5 new videos per month. -The "Recent Updates" page has posted dates for the videos, but there is no posting date for most of the videos or photosets in the members area. -Most of the sites in the network are not updating. -Most of the models speak Russian. But after watching Russian porn for many years, I've learned that "Aaaahhh", "Uhhhhhh", and other moans and groans sound alike in Russian, English, German and Spanish. The Japanese sex moans and groans are different: they sound like the girls are crying, which takes getting used to. Bottom Line: The site theme is teachers fucking their young students. The main attraction of the site and network is the level of attractiveness of the models. Models are teens or in their twenties. If you're into teen porn models, you've seen many of these girls at other teen sites, such as Lets Doe It, Joymii, Metart network, Teen Mega World network, Nubiles, Wow network. I mean, these girls are showcased all over the internet at teen sites. They are attractive to lovely, and they are worth watching in action. The action is mainly one girl with an older man, or sometimes two girls with an older man. The older man can be anywhere from his thirties to early fifties. Not a lot of real older grandpa types. The guys are supposed to be teachers or tutors, so it makes sense that they aren't the real older guys found on some old/young sites. The main reason the girls are cute is because of their youth. But they are also chosen because they are naturally attractive. Firm, tight bodies, the smile of enjoying life before they've been beaten down by disappointments. The plots are minimal. The girls are supposedly horny, and start groping their tutor/teacher on the slightest excuse. Or the tutor whips out his cock because he wants to get his rocks off. I mean, these are Russian stunt cocks, and they know the girls are eager to suck cock or get their pussies fucked (Russian porn models are not only cute, they've bypasssed fake shyness and are willing and eager to have sex). So this isn't glamcore, but straight hardcore teen/older man sex. I've read that many movie stars became actors because they were shy as children. And even when these actors become world famous, they are still shy in their private lives. Maybe that's the reason Russian teens go into porn: to overcome their fears of sex. On camera, Russian teens can put on a great show. And even if most of them aren't great actors, with a minimal plot, there's very little acting required, beyond moaning and groaning to show how excited they are when getting fucked. Which is good, because that eliminates the need for the porn writer to think up meaningful plots. The basic premise is: you have a teen girl, who is supposed to be studying with a tutor: And then, after a few minutes, BAM, the girl is sucking his cock, or getting screwed. The cuteness of the models, their enthusiasm for sex, obviates the need for plot. And the older guys are lucky to be able to fuck these cuties and get paid for it. I'm giving the site a score of 93. You get a large site (255 videos and matching photosets), plus access to about 30 other teen-oriented sites. There are 5 sites featuring old/young in the network, with other sites featuring virgin sex, anal sex, lesbian, cocksucking, baby sitters, etc. The main draw of the site and the network is the level of attractiveness of the teen models. Navigation is basically simple. I wish the content had posting dates, because it would be nice to see if the model is still active, or if the content was filmed years ago. But if you're into teen porn, this site will give you plenty of teen starlets. If you enjoy the old/young niche, you get 5 sites. And if you don't like old/young, you still get maybe 10,000 other teen videos in 25 other sites. 12-24-21  04:40am Replies (0) Review 94 Wet And Pissy (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Focuses on solo girls peeing. -Quality site for this niche. -Rabbits Reviews (a sister site to PU) has discounted memberships to the Wet and Puffy network of: $9.95 for the first month (recurring at $29.95/month) $60 for the first year $199.95 lifetime membership -Navigation is easy. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -320p through 1080p videos. They advertise 4K is available, but I haven't seen them at this site. Maybe at another site in the network? -Downloads/streams to PCs and mobile devices. -Weekly updates. -Cam shows. -5 sites are included in your membership: Wet & Puffy; Wet and Pissy; We Like To Suck; Eurobabe Facials; Simply Anal. -The videos are good quality: nice sets, good camera work, nicely focused, well lit, good colors on the skin tones and the entire shot, good sound control. Cons: -The models range from plain or unattractive to some that are attractive. But the general level of the models' attractiveness is below the standards of most teen sites. -Login details (username and password) are computer generated. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Pissing is the main focus, almost the only focus. of the site. No b/g, no g/g. So if you're not into pissing, the site would have limited appeal. Bottom Line: Stats: Most videos run about 30 minutes. Video definition from 320p through 1080p. There is a low quality and a high quality zip file for each photoset, that is a record of the video. The site theme is solo women pissing. I think piss smells bad, and it seems like an un-hygenic thing to rub piss on yourself, or piss on a furniture or the floor, or to drink or lick piss. But the models at this site are moaning and groaning like pissing is enough to get them off, without a male or female partner needed. So if you're into pissing as a fetish (not painful or sadistic pissing, but pleasurable pissing), this site is for you. Because that's what the videos feature: lots of solo girls pissing, and rubbing the piss on their bodies, and drinking it, with lots of noise to show how wonderful the piss is when they rub it on themselves, or when they drink it. But the girls can bring out a dildo, after they've been playing with their piss, to reach a higher orgasm. I guess the combination of piss and masturbation is the perfect combo for these girls. Because they've been pissing and stopping, pissing and stopping, but they manage to piss even more after masturbating with a dildo, Watching these videos reminds me of the song, "Cry me a river", except in this case, it's more like "Piss me a river". The amount of piss these girls make is tremendous. I wonder if they use some device that makes water flow from the girls' pussies. That would help with the smell, and make the drinking and rubbing more hygenic, and the clean-up easier. Because you have to watch a few of these videos to believe how much water/piss is coming out of a girl's pussy during a single 30 minute video. I take diuretic pills (also called water pills) for health reasons, prescribed by my medical doctor. So I often have to pee every few hours (even at night, which wakes me up when my bladder is full). But I can't pee anywhere near what these girls are peeing. They are younger than me, don't have my health problems, so I can understand they can pee more. But not in the quantities of pee that seems to flow in a single 30-minute session. I couldn't pee that much in several days. I mean, it just flows, stop, flows again, stops, flows again, then flows some more, in small and large amounts. So I'm suspicious that some of the "pee" is really water, coming from some hidden device. Which might hurt the fantasy. I'm giving the site a score of 88. The site is heaven for pee fetishists. Site structure makes for easy navigation. Videos are professionally shot, excellent camera work, nice settings, excellent lighting and sound control and colors. Photosets come in a zip file of two definition: regular and high definition. I wish the models were more attractive. But that's a personal preference. Some PU members might disagree with my preferences, and think the models are very attractive. 12-23-21  05:04pm Replies (0) Review 95 New Sensations Network (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -They have a toy store. This is new, since I last joined. You can get 15% discount on your first order with a coupon. I don't have any sex toys, but if PU members want to email me in private for a bulk order, I am willing to consider their desires. Vibrators, dildoes, cock rings (specify the size???), pumps, beads, strap-ons, etc. -Network advertises: 7500+ videos 2500+ models 1080p/4K videos regular updates -They have a site-discount section of porn deals, some as low as $5/month, but these are to major porn sites, like Evil Angel, Metart, Sexart, Adult Time. Some of these deals might be streaming only Other subs are less than $10/month for other major sites. Femjoy for $9.95 for the first month. Or $79.95 for the year, that's the lowest I've ever seen for Femjoy. These deals might be part of the Christmas holiday specials being offered currently. -Videos are normally available in 720p and 1080p in multiple mbps (bitrates). -Streaming and downloads are unlimited. Cons: -Cons are basically minor. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Plus another offer for a trial sub to a different site. -On holidays, you can often find a yearly sub for $60 to New Sensations. That includes unlimited streaming and downloads. If you join for a higher price and find the $60 offer later, you will have buyer's remorse. -Customer support uses a ticket system. I haven't used it, but a live chat would be much faster, or a telephone number would be helpful. -There is a text message preceding many of their videos that the video is fantasy: the performers are actors who are not related, and no laws are being violated. This is assumed true for almost all porn I've seen, but as a legal notice, I guess it helps to avoid lawsuits. -A lot of ads on member pages. Takes up a lot of the page, that you wish was devoted to features you can use, instead of offers to join other sites. Bottom Line: -For $60/year, I think New Sensations is a worthwhile join. The models can be attractive, cute, lovely. There appear to be 26 separate sites in the network. Navigation is simple, if you can ignore all the ads on the member pages. On the member page for a specific video, you have your choice: stream video download video view photos add video to your favorites list The video page gives you the basic information on the video: site, video title, runtime, model(s), descriptive tags. With a large photo illustating the model(s). The model page lists the basic stats of the model: Height, measurements, social media page. Sometimes her date of birth is included. You also have hot links for: search function, scenes(at the site), models, categories, sites, live cams, favorites, and daily deals (in case you want to see even more ads). So navigation is simple, and well laid-out. The sites in the network cover a variety of niches: family incest, wife playing around, lesbian, solo models, taboo, romance, parody, teen, schoolgirl, big boobs, jizz, milfs, more lesbian, POV, latina, anal, squirting, etc. You have a model listing for each site. The individual model's page has hot links to her network content. The main draw of the site is the attractive models. The videos are professionally shot. Nice sets, steady, focused camera work, good lighting, good colors. They often give a story to the videos, to give extra meaning to the sex. Not real heavy on plot, but just enough to tell yourself, "the model is not only physically attractive, but she's also nice, and worth fucking". In other words, the model is not just a piece of meat. $60 for a year's access is a low price for access to 7500+ good to excellent hardcore videos. Along with their photosets. In a network that is easy to use. And even though I complain about the constant ads, some of the advertised prices are surprisingly low, and worth taking advantage of. $5 for 1 month of Metart. $5 for 1 month of Sexart. $80 for a year of Femjoy. 12-23-21  01:40am Replies (0) Review 96 Sinful Raw (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Prime network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. You don't have to pay extra for any premium sites. -Video definition is 540p through 4K. -Zip file for the photoset of the video. -High production values: Even though the site specializes in shooting dark videos and photosets (are they trying to save electric bills?), the costumes are expensive, the sets are expensive, the background music is tasteful, there is ample use of oils for sensuous massages and sensual fucking. Cons: -Small site. Only 19 videos (plus matching photosets). -Slow update rate. -Captcha required for login. -Pre-checked cross-sales on join pages. Bottom Line: -Video content: 19 videos. -Video runtime: averages around 30-32 minutes. -Photosets: 19 photosets. -Photosets run around 134 photos per set. Site theme: Sex is sinful. Forget that sex is needed to make children, which is God's plan to replentish the earth after adults die. The site shows how people with twisted desires are having all kinds of dirty, evil sex: Blowjobs, pussy eating, masturbation, handjobs, pussy fingering, orgies, bondage, this site shows how men and women can cheat on their partners, and fall into temptation while doing the devil's work. There's also vaginal and anal sex. The site features videos with not only dark themes, but dark lighting as well. You have boy/girl sex, threesomes, one guy with multiple girls, lots of oil to make the naked bodies glisten with passion. This is stylized glamcore. Trying for an aesthetic vision of raw, sinful sex. I'm repeating myself, but I saw Emmanuelle (1974), the French softcore movie with Sylvia Kristel, and Story of O (1975), also a French softcore movie. Both of those movies had a visual and emotional impact that was undeniable. I believe the 1970s was the golden age of porn (except that the internet in the 1990s and beyond has also produced a huge amount of high quality softcore and hardcore content). The great thing about Emanuelle and Story of O was the plot made sense, the acting was acceptable to good, the models/actors were extremely attractive, the colors and images were crisp and clear. I bought DVDs of those 2 movies from Amazon, and the DVDs were degraded copies of the original movies. A shame. Because those 2 movies were impressive. Sinful Raw videos and photos use dark lighting to try to make the scenes erotic and sensual. The sex is supposed to be sinful. I think the stylized approach of the site is pretentious. I appreciate the simpler style of Massage Rooms, where the scenes are more brightly lit, so you can see the models more clearly. I mean, if you have attractive models, let me see them. Except that the models at Sinful Raw are not the most attractive models you've ever seen: so maybe the darkness helps to hide the blemishes, age wrinkles, whatever, and your imagination is supposed to be fired into thinking these are godesses who are getting fucked. Except my imagination is limited, and I prefer the Massage Rooms videos, where I can see the lovely models, and see them getting massaged sensually, and then getting fucked sensually. Or getting fucked energetically. But let me see and admire and crave the bodies of lovely young models, instead of squinting in the dark to see what the model looks like. Maybe they should have the models fucking in a dark closet. Then I could use my imagination, instead of trying to see what the models look like. To see what the models are supposed to be doing. I know they are supposed to be doing naughty things, but it would help to be able to see the naughty things they are doing in the dark. Pure Taboo, a site in the Adult Time network, often uses dark lighting, which is also supposed to heighten the erotic mood. But Sinful Raw goes overboard with the darkness, and you often can't see what the performers look like, or what they are supposed to be doing. I'm giving the site a score of 78. It's a tiny site. Currently 19 videos and matching photosets. The idea of stylized hardcore glamour is good, but they go overboard with the darkness. The videos show high technical qualities, except you can't clearly see the models because it's too fucking dark. I much prefer Pure Taboo, a competing site from a competing network. Pure Taboo is probably the finest story-driven hardcore site on the internet. The Sinful Raw site videos don't have much of a story: you see models fucking, and you're supposed to think there's some story behind the fucking. 12-22-21  02:50pm Replies (0) Review 97 Give Me Teens (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Give Me Teens is a channel in the Adult Time network. Years ago it used to be part of the Devils Film/Fame Digital network. My best guess is that it still is part of Devils Film; if you go to the site: givemeteens.com, the page shows "Devil's Film presents Give Me Teens". Joining Give Me Teens, or Devils Film, gives you access to Adult Time network. And vice versa: joining Adult Time gives you access to Devils Film and Give Me Teens. And in the Adult Time website, Give Me Teens has the text "Part of devilsfilm". -The channel has videos dating back to 2006, so you can find porn stars when they were first starting out. -The site is a smorgasbord of teen, boy/girl, 3-somes, lesbian, cocksucking, vaginal and anal sex, with plenty of young/old sex as well. Cons: -The earliest videos were low-rent videos filmed in 240p and 480p definition. -Cheap sets, mainly unattractive models, stupid or unimaginative dialog, poor acting, makes watching most of these videos a waste of time. I would far rather watch well-produced videos with attractive models. Why waste time on crap? -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: Give Me Teens stats: Videos: 1412 Video runtime: averages around 35 minutes. Normally, I give any chanel in the Adult Time network a score in the 90s, because of the vast amount of hardcore content covering a wide variety of niches, and because most of the content is good to very good. However, the models at Give Me Teens are not very attractive. The models at the Wow/Diesel sites are far superior in looks. The models at many teen sites are far more attractive. The plots are stupid, the dialog is stupid, the acting is poor. In my opinion, the Adult Time network would be improved if they deleted the Give Me Teens channel. Why keep low quality crap like the Give Me Teens channel? Adult Time has thousands of teen-oriented videos apart from the Give Me Teens channel, so there's no need for over 1,000 videos featuring almost entirely unattractive teens with stupid plots, stupid dialog, poor acting. I do admit there are a few attractive teens at the channel. But slogging through the junk to find the attractive teens is not worth the effort. When the site first started out, and for a few years afterwards, they did put effort into using attractive teens. But those early videos are only available in 240p and 480p definition, and most PU members wouldn't watch such low-definition videos. They would require 1080p or higher. Edit: I'm being hard on this site. If you enjoy watching porn that reminds you of your first experience with porn videos, this site might give you some nostalgia value: the sets seem cheap, the acting is atrocious, the models look like porn stars (not a compliment). But I remember watching Emmanuelle, the French softcore porn movie around 1974, and Story of O around 1975. The images for those movies were clear and crisp, the colors vivid, and they were shown in regular movie theaters, not porno movie theaters. Porn was suddenly gaining acceptance, beyond the low-grade shit shown in home movies. The internet gives you access to quality porn, with high production values, and attractive to beautiful models. The Give Me Teens site is low quality porn. 12-21-21  11:05am Replies (0) Review 98 Teach Me Fisting (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the 21 Sextreme network. -21 Sextreme network is part of the Adult Time network. -Your login details (username and password) should give you access to all the channels in the Adult Time network. You don't need separate login details for each channel. -Adult Time has 1000s of porn models, many of them A-listers. Covering a wide range of ethnicities (white, hispanic, black, asian, and tran[Is tran ethnic, or what?]). You also get a wide range of model ages and body types. The Teach Me Fisting channel is only a channel in Adult Time, so that channel gives you a much narrower range of models: mainly slender white teen and twenties. -Customer support is Fame Support. They have 24/7 support, email or live chat. Live chat normally answers within a few minutes, and is the fastest way to get answers. The live chat agent is helpful and patient. I think Fame Support, because of the live chat option, is probably the best support staff of any network I've joined. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): I used to think Metart support was the best, but they only have email, no live chat. Fame Support live chat answers within minutes. Metart support answers in a few hours. -Many of the models at Teach Me Fisting are attractive: Zasie Skymm, Rebecca Black, Sasha Sparrow, Lady Dee, Yasmeena, Antonia Sainz, Elena Vega, etc. -Videos offered in 160p - 2160p definition starting December 2018. Before that, the highest definition was 1080p. -Streaming is unlimited. -Download for the channel and the network has a 300 GB daily limit, which seems huge. -There is a photoset for each video. Can watch online, or download in a zip file. Zip file has a 1280x1919 pixel definition, and a higher 4000x2668 pixel definition. CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. -The channel is an archive. The last update was 2019-02-25. But the Adult Time network has 8+ daily updates. Since the Adult Time network updates daily, I ignore that this site is an archive. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -A monthly subcription normally is streaming only. I've seen some monthly subs that have both streaming and downloading, but most monthly subs are streaming only. The best way to get downloading privileges is with a yearly sub, which many PU members dislike. -There's no model listing for the Teach Me Fisting channel. There is a model listing for the Adult Time network: but that has 13863 models (male and female) listed, which is a huge number of models to search through. A dedicated model listing for each Adult Time channel would be a nice feature. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): stats for the Teach Me Fisting channel: Videos 656. Video runtime is 20-30 minutes. Photosets for each Teach Me Fisting video run around 80-160 photos per set. stats (for the 21 Sextreme network): Videos 5708 Hours of Porn 2378 Pornstars 1346 Teach Me Fisting is a lesbian site. This is a conscious choice. Someone can argue that lesbian is not a conscious choice. But if you open your mind, you might realize that a guy can put his fist into a girl's pussy, just like a woman. Assuming the guy and girl are both willing. Fisting is considered extreme porn. Maybe I'm jaded, but after a watching a few of these videos, I don't think fisting is that over-the-top. Just like anal is not that over-the-top. That's me. Some bible-thumper would probabably consider any sex extreme, if the couple is not married in church and they happen to deviate from the missionary position. The videos are professionally shot. Well lit, clear, crisp images, good colors, good sound control. Nice sets. Many of the models are young and attractive. They often feature 2 girls in a bedroom kissing before they move lower down for the breast and pussy and ass. So it's not harsh sex, but sticking your fist into a girl's pussy would be hard sex. So it's both romantic (the kissing and caressing) and hardcore (the fist in the pussy). The main attraction for me is how attractive many of these models are. Also, the videos have excellent technical quality. Although the fisting is supposed to be the highlight of the videos, the girls can easily spend 9-12 minutes on kissing, caressing, sucking, fingering, before the fisting starts. There are plenty of other lesbian sites in the Adult Time network. As well as sites that feature boy/girl sex. Some tran sex. And Adult Time is starting to add male gay content. I'm giving Teach Me Fisting a score of 93. That's mainly because of the Adult Time access. But the Teach Me Fisting site is worth checking out, if you're into attractive lesbian ladies. 12-20-21  06:53pm Replies (0) Review 99 Petite HD Porn (0) 94.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network, a network dedicated to attractive teen models. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network. No sites in the network require an upgraded payment. You get access to 18 sites in the network. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -You have a choice of a photoset or a screencap set. The screencap set is smaller than the photoset. Screencap sets average around 33 screencaps, while the photosets average 60-160 photos. -The models are almost all attractive or cute, and the photosets are worth keeping. If the models weren't so cute, the screencaps might be worth collecting, but since the models are really good-looking, I'd collect the photosets, since the cost of storage keeps dropping every year. -Photosets have 3 zip files: small, medium, large. -Screencaps sets have 1 zip file: 1920x1080px. -Newer videos starting around Oct 2020 have 270p through 2160p (4K). Before that, 1080p was the highest definition. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -You can select video play speed at 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0. I'm not sure why anyone would watch at other than 1.0, but you have your choice. -You can comment on the videos and photosets. They allow negative comments to remain. Some other sites remove negative comments, but not this network. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor. I think the network and the site are first class. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The star of the network is nubiles.net, which is like an encyclopedia of young porn stars. I'm listing it as a con, because they don't showcase that site the way it deserves, and many people are not aware that nubiles.net is included in the Nubiles Porn network. Which is a shame, because nubiles.net, by itself, is worth the membership price. -Models are slender white teens to twenties, but they all look attractive to fucking attractive. Not a lot of variety: no blacks, hispanic, asian, that I could find. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The videos are basically sex between young models. There is minimal plot. But the models are so attractive, so fucking desirable, that a plot isn't needed (although some plot would give more meaning to the sex). -You can be logged out of the site for inactivity. Not sure how long it takes. I'm writing this review, I was logged out because instead of switching around the sites or different videos, I was writing this review, and I got logged out. Very minor con. -There is a model page for each model, with links to her content at the network, but a model listing would be a nice feature. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site stats: Launch date: Oct 29, 2013 Videos: 226 Photosets (and screencaps): 226 (a matching photoset and screencap for each video) Photosets: average around 60 to 160 photos Sceencap sets: average around 33 screencaps -The main draw of the site (and the network) is the attractive collection of teen and twenty-some models. They are almost all attractive to really attractive. The site mainly features boy/girl sex. But there is some lesbian sex, with girl on girl. And a few videos feature 2 boys on 1 girl. The oldest video has a posting date of Oct 29, 2013, and it offers your choice of 270p through 1080p. The oldest videos showcase cute teens, and the videos are excellent quality: professional lighting and sound control, good camera work, nice sets. A quality product, right from the start of this site. The models are naturally attractive: They are young women, with few obvious implants, not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of piercings(except a belly button stud is very popular). -The videos have little or no plot, that's a plus, because most porn models are very poor actors. So you don't have to listen to lame dialog, or watch models trying to act a part, other than trying to show excitement about getting fucked. If you're into teen and early twenties models who are slender white teens that are attractive to gorgeous, this site and network has plenty of models that are worth watching. The sex is bread and butter, not over the top, just young models who enjoy getting fucked. The videos are clear and crisp, excellent colors, and you just have to enjoy watching these lovelies in action. Giving the site a score of 95. Not only do you have a fairly large site of lovely young models, you also gain access to a teen-oriented network that gives you an outstanding collection of teen/twenty-something models. 12-18-21  07:44pm Replies (0) Review 100 Teenrs (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Teenrs.com is now part of the Adult Prime network. If you hit the PU link to Teenrs.com, and go to the join page, it shows that Teenrs is part of the Adult Prime network. Why is this important? The review of Teenrs at TBP (The Best Porn) is dated Aug 18, '18, and the facts are out of date. The review indicates Teenrs is a network with access to 2 sites. Teenrs, as part of the Adult Prime network, gives you access to over 90 studios, and a whole bunch of sites. However, if you aren't aware that Teenrs is part of the Adult Prime network, you can join Teenrs, even if you have already joined Adult Prime. When I opened the Teenrs web page, and hit the join link, I saw the join page inviting me to join the site. Even though I already have access to the site through my membership in Adult Prime. Cons: -No dedicated support team for the network. Apparently support is handled by the billing agents. My billing agent, VXSBill, has an email address, but might not reply to any questions, other than cancelling your sub. -Pre-checked cross-sales on join pages. -Captcha normally required for login. Bottom Line: With membership in the site, you get network access. And vice versa: with network access, you get the Teenrs site/channel access included. Adult Prime network stats: Video count: 20427 Photoset count: 22515 Updates: daily Teenrs stats: Videos: 49 Photosets: 46 The network (and the Teenrs site) focuses on teens. The best sites I've seen on the network are Club Sweethearts and Digital Desire, but there are plenty of other sites/studios that are worth exploring. And the teen models can be luscious, cute, lip-smacking adorable. The Teenrs site appears to be a mash-up of videos (and photosets) that were put into a site to create a porn site to make money. Little thought was put into making these videos. No theme was chosen, other than getting some young teen and filming them having sex. If the Teenrs site was eliminated from the Adult Prime network, the network would lose no value. The Teenrs site is basically worthless. I am giving the site a score of 93, because if you join Teenrs, you gain Adult Prime access. You could join Adult Prime directly, or one of the included sites to gain Adult Prime access. Edit: I am writing as a porn consumer. Not as a lawyer, or a porn professional. Technically, I don't know what the legal status of Teenrs is: I already joined Adult Prime. My email confirmation states "Membership Adultprime.com Approved". However, apparently I can join through the Teenrs portal, and pay a separate membership fee. What would I gain? Nothing, as far as I can tell. I would be gaining access to Adult Prime, which I already have. I've sent an email to vxs.com, the biller listed on my Adult Prime membership confirmation email. Waiting/hoping for a reply, that will explain if Teensrs has a separate existence from Adult Prime, in addition to being a channel in Adult Prime. I sent the email 5 days ago, have not gotten a reply yet. I should add that apparently Adult Prime doesn't have a dedicated customer support. Customer support is handled by its billing agents: Epoch, Segpay, VXSBill. Normally, a billing agent is separate from the site it supports. So how much information an agent at VSXBill would have about Adult Prime or Teenrs is debatable. They would have billing questions, cancel memberships, but knowledge about those sites would be limited, I assume. My membership to Adult Prime was handled by VXSBill. They have an email address, but no telephone or live chat is listed to contact them. I sent an email to VXSBill asking some questions, and hoping I will get a reply that answers: A copy of my email to VXSBill is as follows: ------ I just joined AdultPrime.com on 2021-11-23. Is Teenrs.com a separate network from AdultPrime, or is it only a channel in the AdultPrime network? Can you be a member of AdultPrime, and also be a separate member of Teensrs? Or does membership in AdultPrime mean you are automatically a member of Teenrs? Does AdultPrime membership give you access to Teenrs? Does Teensrs membership give you access to AdultPrime? Thanks for any information you can give me. ------ (The form for the internal email did not request any membership details about my membership to Adult Prime, such as login details or membership #, or even the site I was a member of. Which seems strange, since most other billers want that information before they give you any information about your membership.) 12-16-21  02:23pm Replies (2) Shown : 76-100 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.37 seconds.