Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : LKLK (0)

Feedback:   All (518)  |   Reviews (162)  |   Comments (40)  |   Replies (316) Other:   Replies Received (290)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 101-125 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 101 Digital Desire (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Device friendly. Watch on Desktop, tablet, mobile, TV. -Digital Desire was recently merged into the Adult Prime network. I believe it no longer exists as a separate site. Hitting the Digital Desire link at PU opens a web page that shows Digital Desire is now part of the Adult Prime network. -As part of the Adult Prime network, you have access to over 80 different studios. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Digital Desire videos are available in 480p, 720p, 1080p definition. Newer videos have a 4K option. Cons: -The cons are basically minor. -Digital Desire and the Sweethearts Club channels are both excellent sites that are worth joining by themselves. If you're into glamour or teen sites, these are top-of-the-line choices. -Captcha sometimes required for login. -Login details assigned. You can't choose your own. On join page, it says your login details will be sent to you in your confirmation email. That is wrong. Your login details are shown on your join page, but not in the confirmation email of your subscription. -Pre-checked cross-sales on join page. There are multiple cross-sales on the join pages, so be sure to uncheck all these offers. -There is a model page, with links to her content at the channel. But there's no bio data on the model, or her physical attributes (height, weight, measurements, hair color, eye color, birth place, etc.). Bottom Line: Digital Desire is a glamour site. Photos and videos. Some of the most beautiful models in the world. The girls are 18 to early twenties. Mainly white. Stephen Hicks was the founder and main contributor to the Digital Desire site. He was a glamour photographer who died in 2013. He contributed to Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler and other men's magazines in their heyday. Digital Desire is a large site. Videos: 1738 Photosets: 3779 Glam Girls: 1320 Most of the videos and photosets are solo girls. There are some sets with 2 girls. The solo girls feature mastubation. The twosomes are lesbian. The quality of the photography and the videos is superb. The site was described as softcore glamour, but since the videos feature masturbation, I would consider this mid-core. If you were a fan of the Penthouse softcore photos of the 1970s, many of the photosets will bring back fond memories of how luscious some of these Penthouse Pet of the Month were. I admit I'm prejudiced. I find the Digital Desire videos, on average, far more erotic and watchable than the MetArt videos. The Digital Desire videos show masturbation, which the MetArt videos don't. Even leading up to the masturbation parts, the models at Digital Desire can be so fucking cute or desirable that just watching them creates feelings of desire, while watching the MetArt models, although they can be cute to gorgeous, normally leaves you bored and cold. However, the MetArt videos in the last year or so are starting to become more erotic: before, it was mainly a nude model walking around. Now, the models are playing to you, doing a slow strip tease, or moving their bodies in enticing ways. No men are allowed in Digital Desire or MetArt photos or videos, as far as I can tell (except for the photographers, of course, who are off-screen). However, I once did see the hand of a male photographer in a MetArt photoset. It was a photoset by Paromov, one of their leading photographers. Maybe he was trying to direct the model with his hand? I'm giving the Digital Desire channel a score of 95. Partly because the channel has lovely models presented with care, in both the photosets and the videos, to be objects of desire. But also because you get access to the rest of the Adult Prime network, which has even more content worth viewing and collecting. Obviously, not all the content is great, but the Club Sweethearts channel is a fine teen site, with yummy teens that will tease your imagination. 12-10-21  06:22pm Replies (0) Review 102 Spoiled Virgins (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Spoiled Virgins is part of the 1 Pass For All Sites network. You get access to all 35 sites in the network with membership in any one of the sites. -The main value in the site, and the network, is how many attractive virgins there are. These tender young teens are willing and able to give your their virginity because, underneath, they seem to be horny as hell. I wish, growing up, I knew how horny virgins really were. -Defloration.com is a site from a different network that focuses on virgins losing their virginity. That site seems to give a more clinical approach to sex, where the sex is less spontaneous, but it also has many cute girls. However, I don't know if all the girls are really virgins, since I've seen many of them at other porn sites. How many times can a girl lose her virginity? In porn, evidently you can stay a virgin even if you get fucked in the mouth, the pussy, and the ass time and again. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Photosets are from 60 to 300 photos. I think these are still screencaps, but the improvement over the I Fucked Her Finally screencaps is large. -You can select the interval of the slideshow for a photoset from 5 seconds to 25 seconds. Or you can download the photoset for viewing later. -There are no limits for streaming or downloads. CONS(START OF): -The main con is the site is not updating. They don't show the posting date for most videos posted at the site. But checking the list of recent updates to the network, there hasn't been a video posted to the site since April 23, 2021. It's entirely possible there hasn't been an update to the site in years. -The site (and network) doesn't bother to date the videos posted, except for a listing of recent videos. -Videos download with a generic file name, spoiledvirgins_182_1280.mp4. So you have to re-name the file to show the model's name and video title. -The earliest videos have a very low definition, 320x240. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): More recent videos have your choice of definition from 288p through 2160p. -Videos are often in Russian, with no subtitles. But the sex is what counts. The plot is either minimal or senseless. -A lot of pre-checked cross-sales on the join pages. -Almost all links work to stream the videos. I only found one video that had no link to stream the video, but you could download it to watch it on your PC. The video with no streaming link was titled "Young virgin girl fucked for the first time under a doctor's care". BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Virgins are the real thing. There's nothing better than knowing you're the first one to bonk a pretty girl. And if you have a good buddy available, the fun is more than doubled by having a threesome with a virgin. There's one video where a guy gets to fuck a virgin with professional medical help from a nurse. The virgin isn't feeling well, so a nurse comes over and tells the virgin she needs to get fucked. The virgin starts sucking her boyfriend's cock while the nurse supervises. Then the boyfriend starts fucking the virgin on the couch, the no-longer-virgin is so excited the boyfriend flips the girl over and gives it to her doggy style, and finishes off with a facial. From virgin to slut in one happy experience. And the nurse is there to make sure the virgin and her boyfriend end up completely satisfied. This is reality porn at its finest. The videos at this site are better than the videos at the I Fucked Her Finally site. The camera work is better, the lighting is better, the sound control is better. The models are presented better. In Russia, they often have a medical doctor or a nurse available, to check if a virgin needs to be deflowered for health reasons. This is useful if your girlfriend is afraid or reluctant to have sex: you have a medical professional backing you up. And in almost all the cases I've seen, the virgin ends up happy to get fucked. I'm thinking of moving to Russia, where there are lots of cute virgins, and the they are willing and eager to get fucked by older men. This site does not feature older men fucking young virgins. But there are sites in the network where older men are bonking cute young teens. It gives me hope that I too can find happiness in Russia. Giving the site a score of 85. The site is not updating. I think the plots are ridiculous. The girls are attractive, and the videos are nicely shot. But the videos lack heat. There are better sites in the network you have access to. 12-07-21  01:58pm Replies (0) Review 103 I Fucked Her Finally (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the 1 Pass for All Sites network. Membership in any one site gives you access to all 35 sites in the network. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -Large site. 272 videos (plus matching screencap sets). -The main draw is how cute to fucking attractive these teen models are. -The models are slender, white European girls, mostly late teens, or very early twenties. -The models are often perky, and are eager and willing to fuck. This makes you wonder why they chose the site title "I Fucked Her Finally", since none of the girls are reluctant sex partners: they start sucking a dick, or having sex, at the drop of a hat. But you need a title for a site, and that's what they came up with. -Also, there are tons of virgins at the site and network (in someone's imagination, obviously). So a virgin adds extra spice to your imagination, and a little reluctance is normal in a virgin. So the title refers obliquely to the virginal aspect of these cute teens. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -For the last few years, the download definition choices for a video are 360p through 2160p. The videos from years ago had a max definition of 720p or 1080p, depending on when they were posted. -Can view the screen cap sets from a zipped downloaded file, or the online slide show player. Can set the timer for the slide show player from 5 seconds to 25 seconds intervals. -There are hot links at the bottom of the home page to porn sites. Hit a link, and it opens a page of Rabbits Reviews. Cross advertising? -You can add videos to a favorites list. CONS(START OF): -Very slow update rate. Usually 1 new video per month, but some months, might get no videos, or very rarely, 3 videos. -No posting date for most videos. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Only the most recent videos will have a posting date shown on the "Recent Updates" page. -The screen cap sets are screen caps: poor quality screen caps. A shame, since many of these models are cute to lovely, and deserve better treatment. -Customer support is by email. There seems to be a telephone number, but I don't know how to use it: +44 20 3289 2048. Is that a telephone number? I'm guessing that is a European phone number, but I've never called Europe by phone, don't know how. -You can rate the videos. But most videos have only 2 or 3 votes(ratings), which seems strange. This site (and the network) have been around for over 10 years now. -The camera-work can be spotty. And the sound control is poor. I'm playing a video, and I'm wondering who's making noise outside of my house. Then I pause the video, and I realize the noises are coming from the fucking video. You're watching a girl masturbating, so where the fuck are the noises coming from? Poor sound control, that's the answer. -The name of the model in each video needs to be more prominently displayed. You have to search the text description of the video to see if the name of the model is listed. Otherwise, you have no idea who the model is. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): There are 272 videos (and matching screen cap sets) at the site. Video runtime is 20 to 40 minutes. The matching screen cap sets go from 60 to 200 screen caps. Watching these videos is an educational process. You learn that "Dah" means yes in Russian. This is the favorite expression a teen girl screams when she is getting fucked in her pussy or her ass. The site focuses on slender white teen girls who love to suck cock, or take it up their pussy or ass. The girls are more vocal at this site than at 18 Virgin Sex. Maybe because they're no longer virgins? The main selling point of the site (and network) is the good looking teen girls. These girls are fresh, lovely, adorable, you just want to scoop them up and fuck their brains out. They aren't sluts: they just seem so cute and innocent, but they are full of hardcore passion. The videos at the site are a guy and a girl having sex. Or maybe it's two guys and one girl having sex. The sex is bread-and-butter, sort of plain, not over the top. But what makes the videos worth watching is how attractive some of these girls are. But not much effort is put into making these girls glamorous or presenting them to look their best: the girls are young and attractive, with little make-up, no fancy costumes, just OK sets. It's the girls themselves that are attractive. And the truth is that the site does not present them as attractively as possible. I'm looking at Olivia Grace, a cute young teenager, and I don't even recognize her. She seems familiar, I think maybe I've seen her before. Actually, I've seen her at many different porn sites, for many years now. But in this video, "Clothed dude gets deep into naked babe's holes", at the I Fucked Her Finally site, I barely recognize her from the large-sized screen cap shot. She is nowhere near as cute or lovely as she is often seen. And the video itself is not clear and crisp images. The sound track is full of random noises: Olivia Grace is walking around in a large bedroom, just walking, and the sound track is full of random noises. Then you hear her breathing, and you realize the sound is turned way up, to magnify each sound in the almost-empty room. I'm giving the site a score of 80. The girls are mainly attractive, but the videos suffer from poor technical production, and the screencaps are screencaps, not real photographs. If the videos had better production values, and the screen cap sets were real photos, the site would have more value. Because the girls are cute teens. 12-07-21  02:54am Replies (0) Review 104 18 Virgin Sex (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Membership includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. -The main draw of this site (and the network) is the level of attractiveness of the teen models: they range from cute to gorgeous. These are not glamour models, but they could have easily been featured at MetArt or Femjoy or any fine photo site. I mean, these girls are fucking impressive in how cute or lovely they are. The models are often found at Teen Mega World and 18 Videoz and other sites which have a lot of cute teens. On average, I think the teen models at 18 Virgin Sex compare favorably with the Diesel network (Wow Girls, Wow Porn, All Fine Girls), which is the finest collection of teen models I've ever seen for hardcore sex. -There is a short text description of the plot/action of the video. -The plots are simple, so they don't require much acting on the part of the model. Which is a good thing, since most teen porn stars are poor actors. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Most models are slender white European teens. Most models have small or medium breasts. No boob jobs that I've seen yet. The girls range from attractive to extremely attractive. I appreciate that in many of the videos I've seen, the girls act naturally: when I see or hear a girl moaning right from the start because she's touching herself, or the guy is touching her, it's a turn-off. I know it's fake. I prefer a more realistic approach, more natural acting. Not every video is a winner or a keeper. Sometimes the girl is less attractive. Sometimes she tries to put on a show of fake excitement right from the start that is too fake to believe. But some girls are gorgeous, and they can sometimes put on a great show. -Some of the videos appear to be exclusive. Other videos probably aren't exclusive to the site. Certainly, if you visit the porn tube sites, you've probably come across plenty of videos from the 18 Virgin Sex site. Bottom Line: CONS(START OF): -Irregular update rate. Could have 0 to 3 updates in a month for the 18 Virgin Sex site. For the network as a whole, you might have 0 to 5 updates in a month. -Based on the slow update rate, I would not join this site/network for more than 1 month. Unless they changed their policies, and started sending the fresh-faced models to my house (joke- Ha-Ha). -They don't bother to post the dates these videos/photosets were added to the site. -There is a page of specials, which is really just advertising for other sites. -There is a model listing. The model listing has a small thumbnail for each model. You can sort the model listing by: -the entire network, or -by the site you want to examine, or -by the model's name, alphabetically, or -by the model's rating (how popular she is), or -by the model's number of scenes, or -by the model's date. Not sure if this refers to the date the model first appeared at the site or network, or some factor in her videos or photosets. Since almost all videos and photosets show no date, you have to take this sorting-factor on faith. It's a worthless factor to sort by. And the model's popularity is also a worthless factor to sort by. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Did you ever wonder what it's like to fuck a virgin? At 18 Virgin Sex, you get to see cute, nubile girls (18 years old, as shown by their birth certificate, which is mailed to you personally, once you send in your $1,000 US dollar certified bank check), getting fucked for the first time. It only takes another $1,000 US dollars for a certificate signed by a respected European medical doctor ceritifying the girl's virginity before the sex act is performed on her. For an additional $19,999.99 US dollars and cents, the girl herself will appear at your doorstep, and you can sample her wares, to send you into heavenly bliss, without the assistance of any drugs. If drugs are needed, due to your old age, apply to your health care provider. The main negative for the site (and network) is the slow update rate. You have around 35 sites in the network you gain access to with a membership in 18 Virgin Sex. But you only get anywhere from 0 to 5 updates per month. I mean 5 new videos per month max (along with the matching photosets) for the network. The 18 Virgin Sex site updates with 0 to 3 videos per month. -Photosets run around 60 - 160 photos per set. You can view the photos in a slide show, or download the set in a zip file. You can select the time interval for the slide show from 5 seconds to 25 seconds. The zip file downloads with a generic filename, "zip_photos.zip", which you have to re-name to show the models name, set title, site. There's no posting date for the photoset. There's only one definition for the zip file: no choice of low, medium and high definition. The photos in a photoset are low quality: since many of the girls are attractive to extremely attractive, they really deserve a better quality photoset. Even girls you know to be very attractive lose much of the attractive quality because the photos don't showcase how lovely they can be. The videos do a better job capturing the models. Which is the opposite of what a glamour photo site does: glamour photo sites normally present the models most attractively in their photos, with the model coming across as less attractive in their videos, since it's much easier to photoshop a photo versus photoshopping a video. My best guess is that the photo sets are low-quality screen caps made from the video. I've seen other teen sites that make much better, more attractive photosets from their videos from a software program. And that's a shame: because some of the models at 18 Virgin Sex (and the network) are really attractive; and many of the rest of the models, while less attractive, are still worth looking at. So it's a wasted opportunity using attractive models but giving the members such poor-looking screen cap photosets. The girls are usually playing themselves without a lot of over-the-top screams or other noises to illustrate how fake-excited they are. Videos run around 15 minutes. The site has 425 videos. Plus matching photosets (or maybe I should call them screencap sets). You can rate the videos, and add them to a favorites list. Each video has a brief text description of the plot/action, and a very small number of tags describing the action. The text plot description can be wrong: I think the people who wrote the plot descriptions didn't bother to watch the videos they were describing. And the tags can be misleading, as well. Example: The text description for a video is as follows: "Erika Korti's boyfriend is away from her for some time already. Thanks to modern technologies they chat with each other every day. They even discuss their sexual fantasies online. Sure, such conversations turn on the hottie to the limit. She takes off her clothes to caress her beautiful tits, flat tummy, long legs, and wet pussy. CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: 12-07-21  12:08am Replies (1) Review 105 21 Sextreme (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -21 Sextreme is a channel in the Adult Time network. It used to be a separate network, but it was merged into the Adult Time network a few years ago. If you put "21 Sextreme" into the browser address bar, it brings up the 21sextreme.com page, which states that 21 Sextreme is an Adult Time studio, and that 21 Sextreme is part of Adult Time. Edit: On the join page, it says you are joining 21sextreme.com. It does not state specifically that you are joining Adult Time, or that you are getting access to the Adult Time network. But on the preceding public pages, it does state that 21 Sextreme is part of the Adult Time network. So you can assume that you are getting access to the Adult Time network, or can call or live-chat customer support if you want confirmation of your Adult Time network access. -As part of the Adult Time network, you are getting access to over 55,000 hardcore videos. Covering a wide variety of niches. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): All the common niches are more than covered: teens, cocksucking, pussy fucking, anal fucking, lesbian, etc. The Adult Time channel is now adding gay (male gay) content to broaden their audience appeal. -There are two main membership options: A streaming only membership, at $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month. A yearly membership, at $7.95/month, billed at $95.40 at the start of each year. The yearly memberships include streaming and downloading privileges. During holidays, you can often find lower priced memberships offered to some Adult Time channels. -There are 8+ releases daily. -250+ channels to choose from, covering a wide variety of niches. -Many videos are offered from 288p through 2160p. -There is a public page of upcoming videos that highlights what the Adult Time network will be releasing soon. As well as a member's blog that provides more details. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor for the channel and the networks. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): However, even minor cons can be frustrating at times. -Due to the massive content at the Adult Time network, and even at the 21 networks, it can be time-consuming to find the content that appeals to you. There will almost certainly be plenty of content that is doesn't fit your tastes. The 21 Sextreme network, by itself, lists 4,453 videos (with about the same amount of matching photo sets). -One of the largest niches that 21 Sextreme serves is the older man/younger woman. There are well over 1,000 videos in this category. And the older men can be disgusting. They are chosen for their gross physical looks, and you wonder what's driving these younger women into sex with these older men? A paycheck, is what I figure. These are pornstars, after all. -The level of attractiveness of the younger women is below par. At some older/sites sites, the young women are mainly cute young teens. But at the 21 Sextreme network, the younger women are just OK-looking women who are past their teen years, and don't look cute. Their main attraction is they are younger than the gross old men they are having sex with. -The models (men and women) were not chosen for their acting skills. While the plots are minimal, the models do a shit job of playing their roles. However, you have to admire the vigor these grandpas show while fucking their young women: I only wish I had the endurance these old men have. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): If you're into kink, the 21 Sextreme network provides plenty of content. I prefer the Pure Taboo channel of Adult Time, for their story-driven plots, where the stories can be imaginative and the models often exhibit suprising talent for acting their roles. And the models are usually far more attractive than the models at the 21 Sextreme network. However, the 21 Sextreme network does provide a huge amount of hardcore videos with good to excellent production values: the images can be crisp and clear, the colors are vibrant, the lighting and sound control is good. I suggest downing a few shots of your favorite brew before watching these videos: turn off your brain, and enjoy the naked female flesh on display. And for variety, you can watch old/young lesbian love, where older women seduce younger women. Or the other way around. The older women are usually not as gross as the older men, thank goodness. But again, the younger women are not usually as attractive as the models I've seen at most competing old/young sites (Teen Mega World, Oldje, etc.). I'm giving the 21 Sextreme network a score of 90. That's mainly for the Adult Time network access. Adult Time is the best bargain in porn today: a huge catalog of quality hardcore videos, with thousands of A-list porn models, for a low price. It doesn't get better than that. 12-06-21  05:47am Replies (0) Review 106 DP Fanatics (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -DP Fanatics is part of the Adult Time network. I don't believe it's considered a separate site. On the web page for DP Fanatics, it states that DP Fanatics is "A 21 Sextury website". However, 21 Sextury no longer exists as a separate network: 21 Sextury was folded into the Adult Time network a few years back. When I contacted Adult Time network support, I was told that 21 Sextury still exists, even though it is now part of the Adult Time network. -The model selection is attractive young women. Mostly white, European girls. -The women are featured in hardcore sex: they are getting rammed by two guys, in their mouth, their pussy, their ass. So if you're into rough sex or anal sex, this is a site that will arouse your interest. -Membership in DP Fanatics gives you access to the 21 Sextury network, as well as the Adult Time network. I'm not sure why they emphasize the 21 Sextury network, since 21 Sextury is only a small part of Adult Time network. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -As part of the 21 Sextury network, this is a professional site, where the technical features of the videos and photos are excellent: -Video definition from 288p through 2160p. -Excellent camera work. -Clear, crisp images, vivid colors, natural flesh tones on the actors. -Nice sets. -Unlimited streaming. -If you have downloading privileges, there's a 300 GB daily downloading limit. Which is more than enough for most people. I really don't know why they need a daily download limit, except for data hogs who try to download the entire network for piracy. -High res zip file for each photo set. -There is an excellent model page, with hot links to the model's content at the entire Adult Time network. As well as a model listing. The model listing has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, and you can view it by alphabetical, newest, or most popular. But since you have 13,834 models at the network (female and male), searching through the listing can be a mind-numbing experien Bottom Line: CONS(START OF): -My personal preference is seeing one guy and one girl having sex. Or two women having sex. I don't enjoy three-somes as much. Or four-somes or even-higher-somes. Keep it simple, is my thinking. But for people who enjoy three-somes, this site/channel fits the bill. -I also don't think anal sex is the end of the world in sex. That's just me. There are plenty of PU members who really enjoy anal sex. And this channel emphasizes anal sex. -Although the models are attractive, many of them seem to have breast implants. I mean, the breasts can be nice-sized, but they stick straight out, and barely move when the models move. Their breasts are more like bolt-ons. Their breasts don't jiggle. And when the breasts are large-sized, they are even more bolt-on, more jiggle-free, and would look better in photos, where the implants would be less obvious. -I think the DP Fanatics site might give the wrong impression to PU members. The most common plot for the videos is a young woman walks by the glass door of a house and flashes her ass and bare breasts at the 2 guys sitting inside. The guys immediately start to rub their crotches. And then take out their cocks and start stroking away. The girl goes into the house, and it's sex party time, with cocksucking, pussy fucking, ass fucking. Real life is not like this, and if a PU member expects this kind of behavior, he (or she) will be sorely disappointed. -If you join directly through the DP Fanatics site, the choices are: -$9.95/month, streaming only membership -$95.40/year, streaming + download membership. -There's very little plot to the videos. You have a girl and two guys. They appear on screen. And with little or no interaction, they start fucking. So if you're impatient for the "good" parts to start, this site delivers the goods. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): DP Fanatics is an excellent channel of Adult Time. Adult Time is probably one of the finest bargains in porn today. For a low price, you gain access to over 50,000 hardcore videos and photo sets. The quality of the content is good to extremely good. The content covers a wide variety of niches. There are 655 videos listed for DP Fanatics. So it's a large channel. The models are attractive, but I don't care for all the breast implants the models seem to favor. Also, I prefer a little more plot to my videos: otherwise, it's just two or more bodies slapping against each other, with little meaning to the sex. Maybe I'm a romantic, who thinks sex should have some meaning to it, even though I realize that horniness is reason enough. But the videos are crystal clear, with excellent technical production values. The channel is excellent, but it's not my cup of tea. There are other channels in the Adult Time network that I enjoy far more. 12-05-21  10:13am Replies (0) Review 107 Adult Prime (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Daily updates. -Discounted memberships during holidays. I joined during the Black Friday special, for 7.99 Euros/month, for a 12 month join. This works out to about $108.48 US dollars, currently. The standard 12 month rate is 9.99 Euros/month. -The network features a huge amount of cute teen/early twenties models. Most of them are white European models. -The network features lots of videos from different sites, such as Club Sweethearts (the new name for Club Seventeen), Nubiles Net, Grand Parents X, Teen Dreams, Karup's Hometown Amateurs, Real Sex Pass, Granddadz, Retro Raw, Elegant Raw, Met Art, Digital Desire, etc. So you get to sample many different sites, to see what the content is like. A cheap way to see if the sites might be worth a join, if you enjoy their content. -There is a wide variety of niches in the network. Teen, old/young, VR(virtual reality), Bi sex. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Plus other niches, such as classic porn, live cams, taboo, busty models, lesbian, glamour, etc. -Adult Prime network features content from 90 different studios. -There are classic videos from studios that have been remastered in 540p, 720p, and 1080p. -Most of the videos I saw can be streamed or downloaded in 540p, 720p, and 1080p. -You can create and save your own clip. There are free and paid software progams that allow you to create your own clips. So why create clips with the rules that this network imposes on you? Download the entire video, and use a freeware or shareware program, if you want to create your own clips. -No download or streaming limits that I can find. -The billing agents include Epoch and Segpay. CONS(START OF): -No model listing that I could find. A suprising lack. -You can't pick your login details. They are assigned to you. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The join page states that your login details (username and password) will be included in the confirmation email. This is wrong. You have to write down the login details assigned to you on the join page, because the confirmation email does not show your login details. -Pre-checked cross-sales on join pages. There are multiple cross-sales on the join pages, which you need to uncheck if you don't want the trial subscriptions. -They sometimes require a captcha when logging in. -Download speeds can be slow. My PC doesn't easily show the download speed, but it can take several minutes to download a video, or even a photo set. -This is my first time at the network, so I'm still learning to navigate. But controls seems to be lacking. For example, I can't control the slideshow speed for a photo set. -The photo sets seem to have only one definition: you can't choose low, medium or high. -The photos are good quality, but could be better. However, the models are mainly attractive to very attractive teens. And the photo sets are far more erotic than the photo sets at glamour sites like Met Art or Femjoy. The models are not as beautiful as the Met Art or Femjoy models, but the models are getting fucked by guys or girls, and there is definitely more heat in the photo sets. But Met Art and Femjoy are basically softcore glamour sites, so their goal is softcore glamour, not hardcore heat. -Some PU members have reported having streaming issues or navigation issues with the network. I'm still learning to use the network. There might be controls I haven't found yet. Or ways to use the search engine better. -Default filename when downloading a video or photo set is often a generic number. So you have to re-name the file to show the model's name, date posted, site of origin, title, etc. -Many of the videos have a max resolution of 1080p, but there are hundreds of 4K resolution videos as well. Don't expect most videos to have a 4K option, however, which should only bother PU members who demand ultra high definition from their videos. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Adult Prime is a large network. 20,382 videos. 22,495 photo sets. -Adult Prime is an excellent network. Many (or most) of the models are white European teens or early twenties. You also get some older women models, and plenty of old-young combos. But the average model goes from attractive to fucking attractive. You can't compare the models with sites like MetArt and Femjoy, which pick the most beautiful models in the world. But the Adult Prime models are attractive to fucking attractive, and they can put on a show that will get your blood pumping (to put it mildly). -In spite of the minor cons I listed, I think this is an excellent site. Mainly because of the many cute models. But also because the network covers a wide range of niches. There are plenty of hot videos to watch. As well as fine photo sets of attractive to really gorgeous models. Giving the network a score of 93. It's definitely worth a join, if you're a fan of white teen models. And there are plenty of different niches to explore, lots of different sites that contribute content to the network. I also enjoyed the Digital Desire videos/photo sets from when Stephen Hicks was still alive. He was a master of softcore porn of lovely young models. The models are uniformly glamourous, and the photos and videos are more erotic than MetArt or Femjoy. When Hicks died in 2013, the Digital Desire site quality went way down. A real shame. 12-05-21  02:09am Replies (0) Review 108 Girlsway (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Girls Way is part of the Adult Time network. I don't believe it exists as a separate network by itself any more. Therefore, you get access to the entire Adult Time network. -Customer service is 24/7. Telephone, email, live chat. I recommend live chat, since that's the fastest way to get a response. Live chat answers within a few minutes. -The main reason to join Girls Way is because of how attractive many of the models are. Some of the featured models include Dillion Harper, Karlee Grey, August Ames, Eliza Ibarra, Kenzie Reeves, Gianna Dior, Carter Cruise. -There is a fine model listing which has small thumbnails of the models. The thumbnails are clear, but I wish they were larger, because a lot of the girls are really cute. -The model page for each individual model has links to her content at the channel and network. Clicking on the hot link brings up the video you selected. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -There is a text description for each individual video. The video tags can be sparse, but the text description gives you a great idea of the plot of the video. -Photo set for each video. Zip file for the photo set. CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. This is a great channel in the Adult Time network. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -There are supposed to be trailers for each video. I can't play any of the trailers. Don't know if this is due to my PC, or the network server. However, there is a fine text description of each video, that tells you what the action is. Bottom Line: -Girls Way is a lesbian site. Most of the models are teens or early twenties, but you do get some older women as well, playing the "Mommy" role or the "older woman" role. The site/channel features story-driven lesbian porn. Tribbing, pussy licking, squirting, toys, there's a mix of lesbian action. I enjoy the innocent teens seduced by other teens and older women, especially when the innocent teen puts on a good show. Many of the teen girls are fucking cute. I know they're supposed to be lesbians, but watching these girls in action, playing tender young things, I want to throw them on the floor and fuck their brains out. Gabbie Carter, large juicy breasts, firm ass, yes, she's a porn star, but she seems like a sweet young thing you could take home to your parents (parents who don't watch porn, obviously). One of the benefits of the Adult Time network is it has over 200 channels. Many of the channels are a sampling of other fine porn sites: Sexart, Femjoy, Joymii, Club Sweethearts, Viv Thomas, Bare Maidens, etc. Look through the sample channel to see if the content is to your taste, and if the original site is worth a join. Adult Time updates multiple times each day. Girls Way updates about 11 or 12 times per month, which is fast, considering that you have over 200 different channels in the Adult Time network. I'm giving Girls Way a score of 93. Mostly because you have access to Adult Time, one of the finest bargains in porn today. But Girls Way is one of the better channels in the Adult Time network, with a large amount of really attractive models that are worth watching in action. 11-28-21  05:03pm Replies (0) Review 109 21 Naturals (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Site started around 8 years ago. So it has a ton of content. However, a few years ago, it was merged into the Adult Time network, so you have access to over 50,000 hardcore videos, and approximately that many photosets. -21 Naturals focuses on natural models: this means models without breast implants, as far as I can tell. The sex is between men and women. There is plenty of solo male-female, with threesomes as well. -The videos are professionally shot, with excellent production values: clear, crisp images, excellent lighting and sound control and camera-work, nice sets. -Videos are available for streaming. If your membership includes downloads, your choice of definition goes from 160p through 2160p (4K). -Over 1,000 videos at 21 Naturals. Plus you have access the Adult Time network catalog. -PU has a $7.95 streaming only discounted membership for the first month, renewing at $19.95/month. -The model catalog has over 1,000 models, many of them A-listers. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -You can pay for your membership with a credit card or a gift card. -Can watch on your PC, mobile device, Roku. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor. -The biggest con, in my opinion, is that it's difficult to get a complete listing of all the videos at the channel. When you have an embarrassment of riches (too many videos in your catalog), to browse all the videos in chronological order is time consuming. To view all the videos at Adult Time would be a massive task. You can search by model name or other criteria, but it's just mind-numbing to search through such a massive collection of hard core porn. -A streaming only membership can sometimes be found in holiday specials for $5 or $10 for the first month. Memberships with downloading privileges cost more. The easiest way to get downloading privileges is with a yearly membership, that runs around $95. But holiday specials, again, can give cheaper rates. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The problem is that many PU members don't want a yearly membership, preferring the monthly option. -A daily download limit of 300 GB. Shouldn't bother most people in the slightest. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The 21 Naturals theme is natural girls. This means girls with natural breasts. Implants are a popular option with porn stars. 21 Naturals features boy/girl sex and threesomes (2 guys on one girl). It also features anal sex and foot fetish. So if you're into anal sex, and/or foot fetish, this network should offer plenty of videos that fit your niches. In addition, because of the Adult Time network access, you get 50,000 hardcore videos covering a wide variety of niches, with 1,000s of A-list models. The Adult Time network gives you, in addition to the usual white porn stars, Asian, Black, Hispanic stars as well. Many of the models at 21 Naturals are late teen or twenties models, but you get older models as well. There is a photo galleries for each video. You can watch the photo galleries in a slide show or download them in a handy zip file. There is a medium res zip file, and a high res zip file option. Some of the models range from attractive to cute to gorgeous. Zazie Skymm, Jayla De Angelis, Stefany Kyler, the girls are fucking attractive. And if your tastes run to older models, there's plenty of models to choose from. Giving the site a score of 93. That's mainly because of the Adult Time access. However, the 21 Naturals site/channel, would, by itself, be a worthwhile join. 11-28-21  01:12pm Replies (0) Review 110 Out Of The Family (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Out of the Family used to be part of the Devils Film network years ago. But Devils Film is now part of Adult Time, and Out of the Family is now included in the Adult Time network. -With the Adult Time network, you get access to over 52,000 videos, over 250 channels. -You also get 24/7 customer and technical support, with a live chat line (in addition to email and telephone support). Live chat answers almost immediately. -Can also use this with Roku and Chromcast. I have Roku, but don't know how to use it yet. But Roku is supposed to make using your TV easier. -Out of the Family is an educational channel. If you have any personal family issues, you can watch an Out of the Family video and get helpful advice on solving your problems: Sex is the best medicine for reducing stress. -Newer videos are available to stream in 160p through 4K(2160p) resolution. Some memberships are streaming only, some memberships include downloads. CONTINUED: Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Memberships with downloads cost more. Currently, you can have a monthly streaming only membership for $9.95, or yearly for $95.40 with streaming and downloading privileges. -You have 8+ updates daily for the Adult Time network. -Out of the Family channel is still updating. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Login is easy. If you have cookies enabled, and you go to the adult time page, you are automatically entered into the member's area, without having to enter your login details. CONS(START OF): -Navigation can be cumbersome. Trying to list all the videos of a particular channel (sites are called channels at Adult Time) can be tricky, especially with sites with lots of videos. -There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, which seems, to me, to be a huge amount of data you can download. So it's a minor quibble which won't affect most people. I believe streaming is unlimited. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. CONTINUED: Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Currently, there is very little content for gay men at Adult Time. But they are slowly expanding their gay content in 2021. -The sheer amount of content at Adult Time can be both rewarding and frustrating. Rewarding, because there is a ton of good to great content available. Frustrating, because to pour through the content to find what appeals to you can be time consuming. -There are trailers to illustrate what the video is about. But I can't get any of the trailers to play. Don't know if this is a problem of my computer, or a site problem. However, there is a fine text description for each video, as well as tags to describe the action. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Adult Time is probably the finest bargain in porn today. You get a massive catalog of hardcore porn videos, covering a wide range of niches: straight porn (male/female), lesbian, trans, taboo, fetish, teen, MILF, etc. You get multiple daily updates. Thousands of performers. The yearly cost is only $95. And there are sometimes holiday discounts with cheaper rates. Out of the Family started around 10 years ago. The channel has 880 videos, going back years. The modern videos feature a modern porn slut slant: a step mother drops by her step-son's apartment, and seduces him into a blow job, vaginal sex, anal sex. When a friend of the step- son drops by unexpectedly, the step mother invites the friend to join in, which he does. Watching this video teaches you a valuable life lesson: when a strange lady offers you her body, don't hesitate, just start fucking. The site theme is taboo sex between people who are often related by law. Could be step children playing with each other, step children playing with their step parents. Even guys or girls playing with each other, if their step relations (male or female) chime in. This is considered reality porn, but it's the kinkiest reality you've ever seen. I recommend the channel, Out of the Family, because it's a nice-sized channel of hard core porn where you can watch perverts fucking their step-inlaws. Open a six-pack of beer, lay back, and enjoy the action: which is presented in crystal-clear colors. Giving the site a score of 90. The main value is the access to the Adult Time network. But the Out of the Family channel is a good addition to the network, and could give you many hours of pleasurable porn viewing. 11-23-21  02:50am Replies (0) Review 111 Hot Crazy Mess (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Simple setup. Most of the plots are older guy gets seduced by young girls. -The site was added to the Nubile Films around late 2019, as a bonus site. -PU offers a discounted price of $19.94/month. -Login and member pages are secure. -Videos are offered in 270p through 1080p. -Videos have a short text description of the plot. Cons: -Although the site was a bonus site added to Nubile Films in late 2019, it stopped updating in January 2020. -The site follows the same plots as Jays POV. -The visuals of the video are usually clear, with nice colors. But the videos use a POV setup, and the camera can be slightly shaky. Jay should hire a professional videographer to shoot these videos. Bottom Line: Site theme is horny teens who fuck their step fathers or step brothers. So this is faux incest, where you're supposed to experience the excitement of watching taboo sex. The big plus is the girls are usually good-looking teens. A minor negative is the stunt cock is usually Jay, who can get irritating after watching him get seduced time after time. That ploy gets old fast. Would like to see some different stunt cocks, for a different take on the plot. The site only has 67 videos. So it's a very small site. And the last update was in January 2020. If you enjoy the videos, you can find simiilar videos at Jays POV (a channel at Adult Time). The colors of the videos are clear and crisp, but the camera work can be jittery at times. This is POV. As a free add-on to Nubile Films, it's worth checking the site out. Two things impress me about the site. I'm not a fan of POV. I prefer traditional camera-work that gives you a more stable, comprehensive view of the action. However, some of the girls are really cute. And POV can make it seem like you're watching the action right on top of the girl. It's inches away from that lovely feminine flesh. Boobs, pussy, ass. And as many of these videos keep reminding you, it's not really sex between blood relatives. It's only sex between step-relatives. So it's not real incest, but faux incest. Giving the site a score of 79. The main cons are: -It's an archive site. No updates since January 2020. -It's a small site. Only 67 videos. 10-06-21  12:08am Replies (2) Review 112 MetArt (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Probably the finest softcore photo site on the internet. -The largest softcore photo site on the internet. See the bottom line section for the site statistics on the number of photo sets, the number of videos, the number of models, the number of contributing photograpers. -Updates daily with 4 new items (photo set + video), except on the first of each month, when there are 6 new items. -Photo sets are offered in a zip file of low, medium and high definition. -Videos are offered in 270p through 4Kp for the last several years. Before that, the maximum definition offered was 1080p. -Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. -Navigation is basically simple. Good search engine, tags for photo sets and videos. I mainly use the search engine to search for a particular model's content. Cons: The cons are basically minor. -Years ago they had a simple way to list the contents by year and month. They still have a listing for year and month, but it takes more clicks to use it. -I don't know why, but I find many softcore photo sets can be erotic. But it's much harder for a softcore video to be erotic. Many of the videos at MetArt are boring, in spite of how lovely the model can be, in spite of the model exposing her naked flesh. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -MetArt is a huge site. It can be overwhelming when you browse through the massive amount of photo sets and videos. It's a psychological effect, but it's easy to devalue the photo sets of these beautiful models because you have access to thousands of these sets. -Most models range in age from 18 to about 30. Most models are white. Most models are slender to medium build. If these model characteristics fit what you're looking for, you're in luck. But some people want greater diversity. Bottom Line: MetArt is a softcore site. Don't join expecting hardcore content, you will be disappointed. It features a collection of thousands of the most attractive women on the planet. Site stats: Films: 1,839 Galleries: 23,019 Models: 3,878 Photographers: 291 MetArt is probably the finest softcore site on the internet. Because of the low price (it's the same price as Femjoy, MPL Studios, and other fine photo sites), the massive amount of content, the easy navigation. During the holidays, you can often find a special discount of $10 to $15 for the first month. Which is not the case with Femjoy, MPL Studios, or other good softcore sites that only rarely offer a discounted price. Hegre usually offers $15 for the first month during holidays, but MetArt beats Hegre on amount of content, the update rate, and I prefer MetArt over Hegre for its content. I saw a special offer for a Labor Day discount of $5.00 for the first month for MetArt, which is a great price. MetArt has excellent customer support. They will normally respond to an email within a few hours, and they make a real effort to solve any customer problems. If you haven't joined MetArt before, and you enjoy softcore photos, I strongly recommend joining MetArt. It's the finest softcore site on the internet, in my opinion. The beauty of the models, the massive amount of content, easy navigation, excellent customer support, make this the finest softcore site I've ever joined. 09-08-21  08:38am Replies (1) Review 113 Petite Ballerinas Fucked (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Site features models who are mainly young white, slender teens who are role-playing ballerinas. The models are mainly attractive and flexible, which is important when getting fucked. I get out of breath when bending over (I'm in my 70s), but these girls twist their bodies into impossible shapes and keep on fucking. You have to admire them for endurance and enthusiasm. -The models are mainly A-list models. You've seen them at many different porn sites, if you're familiar with teen porn sites. Gina Gerson, Riley Star, Alexis Crystal, Sarah Kay, Piper Perri. Some of them are also featured at softcore photo sites like MetArt. Maybe it's psychology, but seeing them at MetArt and then at hardcore sites gives you a different perspective on these models. -Easy navigation. Hot links to switch between the available sites. -Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. -Your choice for streaming and/or downloads definitions from 270p through 1080p. -Zip file for photo sets and screen caps. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): The photos were shot by a professional photographer: nicely focused, nicely centered, well lit, crystal clear images. The photo sets for a video are worth collecting. -Exclusive content. CONS(START OF): -The main con is this is an archive site. Last update was Sep 8, 2019. But even before then, updates were very spotty, going for months between updates. -An ads splash page when you log in. But there are some very low-priced ads shown. -You get access to the Nubiles.net site with a membership. Nubiles.net is the star of the Nubiles Porn network, but access to Nubiles.net is not as well advertised as the rest of the Nubiles Porn sites. Be sure to visit the Nubiles.net site, to see what the site has to offer. I think Nubiles.net, by itself, is worth the subscription price for the entire network. This con is that the Nubiles.net site is not clearly shown to be part of the network access. -Small site. 39 videos total. Plus a photo set and a screen shot set. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): I don't know why there is a screen shot set, since the photo sets are excellently shot, with over 100 photos per set. If you have a fine photo set, what purpose does the screen cap set of the same video serve? BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Although this is hardcore, it's like a David Hamilton film with a harder edge: the set is a large room with a barre and the model and a stunt cock. The plot is simple: an attractive young girl is practicing ballet, the stunt cock appears, he might help her with her practice for a few moments, but then they quickly get down and dirty. Except it's not dirty sex, but clean sex. The image of the young girl, often with her hair tied back in a bun. Wearing a see-through dance costume, simple yet showcasing the petite body. Piper Perri, one of the featured models, has such a sweet little ass, seduces Skye West, and then Ryan Driler, the stunt cock, joins the fun. It's slow and sensual, and all 3 performers do a fine job. The photography is crystal clear, the images focused and well lit, the technical features are excellent. The simple, mainly empty room highlights the action: no distracting furniture to get in the way of your viewing. You have the ballet barre, the models, and that's it: Simple yet effective. The yummy female flesh is on view. Some of the models are fucking attractive, to put it mildly. As I said, it's a small site. I have no idea why they didn't continue making more content for the site. The site theme is simple. The production costs should be low, because the set is a large, empty room, simple costumes, the site theme is visual and easily captured. I think the producers of the network are idiots, because I really enjoy this site, versus the sites with lame plots that tax the models with limited acting skills and stupid dialog. Maybe the producers think the sites with lame plots and poor acting are funny, and they get a chuckle out of making stupid faux incest videos? What I mean is, with such a clear, uncluttered scene, you can focus on the bodies of these cute young teens, and the camera does a fine job showcasing their tender young flesh. Giving the site a score of 85. It's a small site. The theme is simple and easily filmed, and the videos (and photo sets) are excellent teen porn. Much more enjoyable than many of the videos at other sites in the network. I think they made a mistake by not updating the site. 09-08-21  08:29am Replies (0) Review 114 Horny Hostel (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Lets Doe It network. So you get access to about 17 channels. -All content is exclusive. -Unlimited streaming. But there's a download limit of 100 videos for the entire network per month. Which seems very limiting. -Scenes are available in definitions from 240p through 1080p. Seems strange they don't offer 4K videos, especially for a quality glamour network. -There is a link to skip the intro part of a scene. Useful after you've watched the same intro again and again. Cons: -The main con is the irregular update rate. The site updates with 1 or 2 or 3 scenes per month. -Flash page of ads on logging in to the network. -Poor site layout, which makes navigating the site harder. Instead of a simple interface, you have a poorly laid out network page which has thumbnails of latest releases, popular this week, recently active porn stars, and a line of ads. Plus a line of porn awards won. Who needs this shit? Keep it simple, only show what's really useful, to make navigation easy. -I was using a VPN because it's supposed to make surfing the internet safer. But I got an email message stating the LetsDoeIt site was concerned my account had been hacked. It requested I send a verification code to the site, which I did. Many experts recommend using a VPN for security, but many sites have equipment to detect a VPN and either question your identity or dis-allow access to the site. -Photo sets are tiny. From 10 to 15 photos per set. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Photo sets have only 1 size definition zip file, which has a computer-generated name. So if you do want to collect these photo sets, you have to manually re-name the file with the name of the model, site, posting date, video title. -The videography is not the crystal clear imagery used for the glamour sites. Instead, you get some jerky editing, some video-taped images with lines super-imposed on the images to show it's a video recording of the girl entering the hostel, filters or lack of attention to the outside lighting when the scene is outdoors: the idea is to show you a "real-life" take on the girl's experience. Which grows old fast. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site has 63 scenes. Because you only get 1 to 3 new scenes per month, the site will grow slowly. -The Lets Doe It network is primarily a glamour network. The White Boxxx, A Girl Knows, Xchimera are the primary sites that focus on glamour-styled porn. But the network tries to broaden its appeal by offering other niches, such as rough porn, travel porn, massage porn, etc. The main strength of the network is selecting attractive looking models and then presenting them in a setting (nice sets, nice costumes, excellent technical features for lighting, sound control) that makes the models appear like glamorous movie stars instead of porn stars. Horny Hostel site theme: A girl goes on a trip abroad, she checks into a hostel for a low-priced stay. There she meets a horny guy, and they fuck. Almost no build-up to the sex. European guys are all horny. And girls on vacation are also horny. So this site is a step away from the glamour style. Instead of glamour, this is supposed to be reality porn, or slice of life. The models do wear make-up, but it's minimal. The vibe is raw and slightly gritty. You've got girls on vacation, and either they start off showing their naked bodies--meaning their ready for sex--or they are innocents abroad who just happen to meet horny guys that set off erotic sparks in the girls, who turn out to be more than willing to fuck. No romance, just fucking. But these girls are adult: they don't need romance or sweet talk before they start to have sex with a stranger they just met minutes ago. The guy is horny. The girl, is either horny to start with, or she is hiding that horniness under a calm exterior. And since this is porn, that reduces the need for dialog. Actually, Bitches Abroad, a different channel in the Lets Doe It network, has a similar setup: Bitches Abroad has girls travelling to a different country, who hook up with a stranger and then have sex. But the videography is smoother, the plots make more sense, and the scenes are much more enjoyable. The models are more attractive, and they are presented more attractively. Which makes a big difference. The imagery and esthetics of Bitches Abroad are refined compared to Horny Hostel's raunchy vibe. Giving the site a score of 80. I don't care for the setup. I prefer a little build-up to the sex, or more meaning to the sex. Or some plot that makes sense, other than two horny strangers meeting and deciding to fuck. 09-08-21  08:24am Replies (0) Review 115 Girlfriends Films (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Time network. Which means you get a massive amount of quality porn with your membership. -Customer support from FameSupport, which has a live chat line that is answered almost immediately. Support is 24/7, for live chat, email and telephone. Probably the best online support I've ever had, because of the live chat option. -Videos are available for download and streaming from 160p thru 2160p. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. There is a daily download limit of 300 GB, which seems like a huge amount of data to download. -There is a photo set gallery for each video. The photo sets run around 35 photos per set, which seems small. -Lola Fae, Chloe Foster, Jill Kassidy, Sophia Lux, Bunny Colby, Scarlett Sage, are just a few of the attractive models appearing at the site. Cons: -As part of the Adult Time network, you also get navigation problems: finding all the content at this site, or at other sites in the Adult Time network, can be a real headache. -The photo sets download with a default numerical file name. So you have to rename them with the model's name, site, title, and posting date. -The photo sets are OK photos: could be much better quality, especially when the models are cute. They are better than some screen caps, but you wouldn't collect them for presenting the models attractively, even when the models are naturally attractive. -The videos often have a plot leading up to the sex. But that just shows how poor some of the models are in acting. However, I forgive them for poor acting ability, especially when the models are cute. Bottom Line: There are plenty of lesbian sites online. I think Girlfriends Films is a good lesbian site. Not great, but good. You have some very attractive young models. You have a mix of young and old lesbians, with different body types. They add a plot to create greater meaning for the sex, but the plots don't mean much. Add weak plots with weaker acting skills, and like most porn, you have to turn off your brain to enjoy these videos. There are some sites that have interesting story lines, and the models and stunt cocks do a decent to good acting job, but these are in the minority. Pure Taboo comes to mind, and Viv Thomas has some very fine scenes. But Pure Taboo and Viv Thomas are premium porn sites, watching their videos is like watching a cinematic movie. Giving GirlFriends Films a score of 85. If you're into lesbian porn, the Adult Time network has several channels that fit the bill, plus other channels that have some lesbian porn. 09-08-21  08:17am Replies (0) Review 116 Bounty Hunter Porn (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Bounty Hunter Porn is part of the Nubiles Porn network, which has about 17 different sites. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra to access. -Nubiles Porn currently has a special sale: 30 day membership: $12.95 for the first month, recurring at $14.95/month. 365 day membership: $84.00/year. -Multiple funding choices: credit card, paypal, checking account, eu direct debit, other. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Unlimited downloading and fast streaming. -Hardcore erotic videos. -Top-quality production values. This is not a glamcore site or network, but the sets are clean, the videos and photosets are professionally shot, with good lighting, good sound control, good focus, etc. -Network has weekly updates. -Navigation is simple. Can easily switch to other sites using a hot link. Cons: -Cons are basically minor. -The main con is this is a tiny, archive site. Only 5 videos plus matching photosets. Last update was Sep 19, 2016. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -First page you see on logging in is an ad page: a page filled with ads for other sites, with no content from the network. -There are ads for other sites on every member page. Very common for porn sites. Bottom Line: This site caters to PU members who fantasize about strapping a short-barreled Winchester to their leg, in homage to Steve McQueen, who starred in the TV series "Wanted: Dead or Alive". I always wanted to enforce the law by tracking down evil but lovely young teens who broke the law. No matter how much they might scream and plead, I would fuck them till their brains would explode, because that's what cops do: enforce the law on evil doers everywhere. With such a strong premise, it's disappointing this is a tiny site. The site has 5 videos. With matching photosets. The technical features of the videos and photosets are good. The site was started around 2016, and the videos have a streaming and download choices of 270p through 1080p. Why do I wish the site was larger, and still updating? For several reasons: -The plot/theme of a bounty stud hunting down and fucking a bad teen girl is simple and easily filmed. It requires almost no acting ability, which is great, because most porn models are terrible actors. The plots at many porn sites are stupid, and filled with bad dialogue. This site theme (a bounty guy hunting down a girl) should be easy to film, with simple dialogue that is less cringe-worthy than the average porn video. Only simple acting skills are required to show a guy grabbing a girl and then having sex with her, which is better justification than the un-realistic plots of many porn videos. The selection of models at the site is good: these models are young, cute, nubile, and fit the template of the Nubiles Porn network. Naomi Woods, Alexa Grace, Piper Perri, Alexa Nova, and Kirsten Lee are the models: what hot-blooded American male looking at these models wouldn't fantasize about grabbing these girls and forcing them to have sex, especially since you are supposed to have the force of the law backing you up when you grab these girls? The law teaches you that cops support other cops, in the performance of their duty. So if the criminal cute girl wants to pay you off with a little nookie, what cop would say no? Also, the faces of the bounty hunter studs are blurred in the videos. This is to protect the identity of the studs. How could these videos be improved? The main improvement would be to resume updates. Which won't happen, since the last update was over 5 years ago. Minor improvements would be to give the bounty hunter studs flashier vehicles. A Maserati or Ferrari would be my choice of vehicle to chase these girls. The bounty hunter stud drives a van, which is a let down. Give him a upscale car like the cars the Miami Vice cops drive. A screaming siren would be nice, with flashing lights. I want any vehicles on the road to pull off the road and stop, to show how important I am when I go zooming down the road. Porn is fantasy, and my fantasy is to show the world that I am the greatest, most important PU user on the road. The producers of this site were wrong to stop updating this site. The site theme is more believable than many of the network sites that are currently updating. I'm giving the site a score of 80, because the site models are cute girls, the site theme is easily filmed, and navigation is simple and easy, for checking the site contents, for switching to other sites in the network using a hot link. 08-18-21  11:24pm Replies (0) Review 117 Girls Next Door Abused (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Content is exclusive. -The site (and network) is laid out to make navigation simple. You can easily find the video content of the site -No site timeout that I can find. You can leave the site inactive for hours, and will still be logged in. Perfect for guys who forget what they are logged into (Joke. PU members are self-aware, and watch their porn closely.) -In the last year, they added secure login to the site/network. In the last month, they made the member pages secure (https). -The videos were shot in the US, so the models speak English. Which helps to show how these macho studs enjoy humiliating these girls. Cons: -Do not join the site through the site itself. You will be paying a high price. $29.95/month, or $50 for 3 months. Join through the 18Videoz site, where the fee is $60/year. Or $15/month. The 18Videoz membership includes The Girls Next Door Abused site, plus access to 17 more sites. -The main con is this is an archive site. The site stopped updating in 2012 or earlier. A PU member in 2008 reported that the site had stopped updating, but was changing the content posting dates to give the impression that content was newly added. -Ads on every page. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -They need to do an update of the public page advertising the site. The photos/thumbnails are washed out images, with poor colors, images that are not clear and crisp. The public page is the first thing a person sees when looking at the site. They need to sell the site, not show an old tired page that has been out of date for many years. Bottom Line: Because this is an archive site, with old content, the videos and screenshots are low quality. The photography is poor, the lighting is poor, the colors are poor, the sets are cheap, the definition is low compared to what most porn sites offer. The only value this site offers is a reminder of the early days of porn. And what producers could get away with. The site theme is treating girls like trash: get your rocks off with these girls, lie to them, humiliate them, and show them what a macho stud you are before pushing them out the door. Site contents: 48 videos. Runtime is 20 to 33 minutes. There is a montage of screenshots for each video, but no way to view the individual screenshots online, or to download the screenshot set. The hot link for online viewing of the screenshots has disappeared, and the hot link for downloading a zip file for the screenshots has disappeared. And tech support pays no attention to such minor defects. I'm giving the site a score of 65. Most of the archive sites in this network stopped updating 5 or more years ago, and the quality of the videos is poor: low definition, cheap sets, poor lighting, low technical production values, etc. There are some sites in the network that are still updating, and the videos at those sites are much higher quality. Also, there are a number of cute models at these other sites. This is a personal opinion, but I don't enjoy watching videos of macho studs fucking young girls and then humiliating them for being stupid enough to have sex with them. It doesn't make me feel smarter or more macho. 08-09-21  08:34am Replies (0) Review 118 Wet And Puffy (0) 73.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Joining any site in the small network gives you access to 5 sites. The 5 sites are listed in the Bottom Line section of this review. -Navigation is basically simple. -There is a text file that describes the action of the video very well. -Also, plenty of tags to describe the action of the video. So search is easy and can be very detailed, if you want it to. -Newer videos have a definition of 320p through 4K. The 4K video file size is around 3.35 GB for a 23 minute runtime video, so the coding seems efficient. -The content is exclusive. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. Cons: -The level of attractiveness of the models is poor. Other PU members have written that they find the models to be attractive. I disagree completely. I respect the opinion of these PU members, but find it hard to agree with their opinion. -I find the quality of the videos and photo sets to be poor. The images are not crystal clear, but either slightly unfocused or with a slight haze to the image. But since the models are not attractive to begin with, I wouldn't mind watching the video with the images in complete darkness, so I wouldn't have to view the models at all. (That is a joke, but also has an element of truth. These models are far below the attractive level of the Teen Mega World models, and comparing the models at Wet and Puffy to the models at the Wow sites is like comparing night and day: the Wow site models are fucking georgeous; the Wet and Puffy models are unappetizing. -The online mechanism for viewing photo sets is clunky. Slow to load images. -Pre-checked cross-sale. Bottom Line: The 5 sites of this network include: Wet and Puffy We Like To Suck Wet and Pissy Simply Anal Eurobabe Facials There is also a live cam show at the network. Membership in any one site gives you access to all 5 sites. The stats for Wet and Puffy network: Over 27000 photos. and Over 480 models. They advertise that the photos are the best ultra high definition picture sets. They advertise that the tags, filters and layout of each page makes browsing simple. The thumbnails that illustrate the models have washed out colors. Even models that appear young and attractive at competing sites look plain and unattractive at this site, in the photo sets and videos. You examine a photo in a photo set, and it appears as if the photo was taken with a filter that makes the model appear slightly out of focus. Each photo set has 2 definition zip files, low and high. The low definition is 666 x 1000 pixels. The high definition is 2267 x 3400 pixels. In the photos, the models are uniformly unattractive. They are plain-looking women. You go to a local mall, you find plenty of good-looking teens or twenty-year-olds. The models at this site are mainly in their twenties or thirties, and they are far less attractive than the normal twenty-thirty-year-old you find at your local mall. One reason is the photos have washed-out colors, so the skin tones of the models are not pleasing. A second reason is the models themselves are below-average in level of physical looks. Plus many of the models have lots of tattoos, which I'm not a fan of. Even though the site advertises "best ultra high definition picture sets", I look at sets and feel the quality is far below the quality of any photo site, in any technical feature you can think of: these photo sets are shit. Teen Mega World, which is a hardcore teen site, has photo sets that are far superior in technical quality to the photo sets at Wet and Puffy. The the quality of the teen models at Teen Mega World is far superior in attractiveness to the Wet and Puffy models. The Wet and Puffy models are mainly plain to unattractive. The photos are not worth collecting. They aren't even worth viewing. Note: some of the live cam girls are really attractive. Note: my opinion seems to be in the minority. There are some attractive models at this site, but they are not presented attractively at the site. Delphine and Nika O, two girls who normally look very attractive at other sites, look washed out (in color and skin tones) and blah at this site. How a girl is photographed can make a huge difference in her appearance. Besides which, most of the models at this site are not that attractive to begin with. Maybe I should have my eyes checked. I look for attractive girls at this site and can't find any. Some of the girls are attractive at other sites, but not at this site. I know that beauty is supposed to be in the eye of the beholder. The average female at any local mall, or even your local grocery store or Walmart, is far more attractive than the models at Wet and Puffy. Maybe my problem is expectations: I assume that most models are chosen for their looks. But at this site, I think they were chosen for performing hardcore sex. Without bothering to filter for attractiveness. The photo play mechanism for viewing photos online is clunky. Images are slow to load. The images themselves are poor in color, poor in clarity. You aren't viewing sharply defined images of the model. The composition of the photo is poor. The sets are inexpensive or cheap and lacking in any imagination. Overall, the photo sets are a waste of storage space, and not worth viewing. I was a member of this site before, and wrote a review that highlighted how poor the site was, in terms of the attractiveness of the models, the poor quality of the photo sets. But my memory is poor, and I forgot how unappealing the site was. Which is the reason I rejoined. I was stupid. Other PU members seem to appreciate the site much more than I do. They cite the attractive models at the site, the ease of navigation, the low membership price. I agree the membership price can be low: PU has the first month's membership for $15, or $60 for a year. I agree that navigation is simple and effective, that Vendo and Epoch are fine billers. But I can't agree the models are attractive. Poor models, poor photography. And that kills the site for me. 08-04-21  11:19pm Replies (2) Review 119 Burning Angel (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Site theme is models with lots of tats and piercings. -Recent videos have your choice of definition of 160p through 2160p for download. -The streaming option is 288p through 2160p. -There is a daily download limit of 300 GB for videos. Which is huge. That would allow you to download about 90 4K videos per day, or 353 720p videos per day. So I don't consider that a con at all. -Customer support is excellent. There is 24/7 for email, telephone, and live chat. I suggest using live chat, since that's the fastest way to get a response. -They use some recognizable stunt cocks, like Steve Holmes and Markus Dupree, as well as models like AVN hall of famer Joanna Angel. So the channel uses big name talent in this niche, which I think of as extreme hardcore goth. Not my cup of tea, since I like cute teens with minimal tats and piercing. But it's a matter of taste. If goth sluts are your fetish, you could find plenty of content to your liking. Cons: -The main con is the navigation. Adult Time and it's channels are difficult to navigate. You can't easily get a listing of all the videos at a channel. Or all the models at a channel. -Memberships need to be understood before you join. The monthly membership is usually streaming only. The simplest way to get downloading privileges is to get an annual membership, but most PU members only want to join for 1 month. There is a monthly membership that gives downloading privileges, but it's hidden, and not usually visible. I suggest using live chat, to see if customer support will offer you a discounted monthly rate that includes downloading privileges. I know at least one PU member who got a monthly Adult Time membership with downloading privileges for the same price as a monthly streaming only membership. -The acting is terrible. The plots are unbelievable. -No model bios. Bottom Line: Adult Time advertises itself as the only (porn) subscription you need. I personally think that's over-hype. There are plenty of other porn sites worth joining. But for fans of hardcore sex, there's no denying that Adult Time gives you plenty of bang for your buck. You get over 250 channels, 55,000 episodes and 8 releases per day. That covers a wide variety of niches. And most of the content is high quality: no schlocky goods on sale that I can find. With so many niches covered, there should be plenty of hardcore action to fill your hardcore needs. Not everyone at the PU site is thrilled with the Adult Time network. But I personally think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today (and that is true for the last few years). Burning Angel used to be a separate site. But it was folded into the Adult Time network a few years ago. I don't believe it still exists as a separate site: it only exists as a channel in the Adult Time network. Does this make a difference in your membership to Burning Angel? Yes. As a channel in Adult Time, navigation in Burning Angel gives you what I consider the Fucked-Up Click Navigation System. Years ago, as a separate site, it was much easier to navigate through the Burning Angel content. In today's world, as part of Adult Time, you need nimble fingers to go Click-Click-Click to find what the hell the content is at Burning Angel. I've been a member of Adult Time for about 3 years now (I know, most PU members only join for 1 month at a time), but I think some of the channels are excellent, especially Pure Taboo, and there's plenty of content for me to find. I just wish the navigation was easier, so I could find the content that I like. What is the site theme of Burning Angel? Hardcore sex. With models that are heavily tattooed and heavily pierced. The sex is a mixture of boy-girl, 2-guys-1-girl, 2-guys-2-girls, girl-girl, blowjob, vaginal, anal, BDSM, cum drinking and swallowing. The plots are simplistic, the acting is kindergarden-level. To watch these videos, turn off your brain, or get really drunk, or snort a couple ounces of cocaine. Note: some of these videos show the actors drinking cocaine. I've heard of snorting cocaine, smoking cocaine, injecting cocaine, but drinking coke is a new one on me. I guess you have to watch Burning Angel to learn the uses of cocaine. Don't use cocaine without the supervision of your medical doctor. Coke can be dangerous to your health. Anyway, the plots and acting of the models are at the kindergarden level. The fake moans and groans of excitement are patently fake. -Note: Many of these videos have been nominated and have won AVN awards. AVN is the adult video industry trade magazine. Burning Angel videos have won best action thriller, best sex comedy scene, best actor, best director, etc. So even though I think these videos are trash, experts in porn think they are among the best videos in porn. I think these videos are shit. But porn professionals think many of these videos are pure gold. You need to watch a few of these videos, to see if they fit your tastes. I'm giving Burning Angel a score of 75. That's very subjective. Main negatives are: The navigation is terrible. The plots are stupid. The acting is terrible. The main benefit of the channel is it makes you realize how wonderful some of the other channels really are. 07-31-21  12:58am Replies (0) Review 120 18 Flesh (0) 58.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the 18Videoz network. You get access to the entire network of 17 sites with membership in any one of the sites. -There is a model page for each model, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what she looks like, along with a small listing of her physical details. But there is no model listing for the site. There's supposed to be a way to bring up a model listing for the site, but I couldn't get it to work. -Low membership fee of $60/year, with a PU discount. Otherwise, the listed price is $120/year. Cons: -18 Flesh is an archive site. The last update was in December 2011. -Most of the 18Videoz sites are archive, that stopped updating years ago. So the quality of the videos is poor for most archive sites. -Every so often your password is rejected. I don't know why. So you have to re-set it, which is easy to do. -Login is secure. But the member pages are not secure. -Ads on every page. The ads are thumbnails, that are not clearly defined as ads. If you click on an ad thumbnail, it brings up a new site for you to join. -There is no text description of the video plot. Except the plot is little or nothing. You have a girl masturbating or exposing parts of her body, and a guy appears to have sex with her. -You do have tags to describe the action, but they're almost un-nessary, because there's almost no plot, just sex. -A lot of the girls are probably pretty teens or early twenties, but because of the poor picture quality, you can't appreciate how pretty these girls are. Bottom Line: Videos have a runtime of around 20 minutes. Videos have a choice of 480p or 536p. On a 27" monitor, even for the higher resolution videos, the image is slightly out of focus. On a 14" monitor (such as a laptop) the image is not as much out of focus, except that I imagine most PU members would not accept viewing these videos because of the poor quality. So the entire 18 Flesh site would be unacceptable, unless for historical interest. Or to see videos of a favorite model that retired years ago. -There is a photo set of each video. The photo set is made up of screenshots, not photos. There is no way to bring up the screenshots individually on your monitor. And there is no zip file for the photo set. Years ago the site probably had a program to view the screen shots online, and probably had a zip file for the photo sets, but the online viewing program and the zip file download option seem to have disappeared. -There is a search function to list models at the site/network, but I couldn't get it to work: couldn't bring up any model names, that fit any age range, debut date at the site or network, or dates videos were posted at the site/network. Conclusion: site maintenance is hit or miss, mainly missing. Bottom line summary: The 18 Flesh site seems like a waste of opportunity and internet space. Due to the poor quality of the videos, the videos are basically unwatchable. There seem to be a lot of cute girls at the site, but the poor quality videos, and the screenshots you can't view onscreen or download, along with the poor search capability, make the site worthless. They did upgrade the login to the network, and it's now https, which is secure. But the member pages for the site/network are non-secure. I'm giving the site a score of 58. I found nothing at the site (videos, screen caps) worth viewing. Actually, I couldn't view any screencaps, because all I found were montages of the screen cap photosets. And I've found much better videos at other paysites with a 536p definition that showed what the models looked like more clearly. 07-11-21  07:40pm Replies (0) Review 121 Spank Monster (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -This review is based on the Spank Monster channel of Adult Time. There is a separate Spank Monster site, but I would not recommend joining the original Spank Monster site for a few reasons. See the Bottom Line summary section of this review to see why I would join AdulT Time instead of joining the Spank Monster site. -Videos can be streamed or downloaded in definitions from 160p through 2160p. -The production values are good to excellent: nice sets, cute teen models, excellent lighting, good sound control. -Even though the plots soon get repetitious, and I think the stunt cock (Jay Rock) is sort of slow-witted because he keeps resisting these cute teen girls who want to fuck him, I have to give Jay credit for picking such cute teens for his step-daughters. -The models are cute teens or early-twenties girls. Not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of make-up. Very few piercings (except for the belly-button stud). Cons: -This is an Adult Time channel. So the navigation could be much better. If you try to bring up the Spank Monster channel listing, it might not load. Or if you try to get around that by an aphabetical listing of channels to find the Spank Monster channel, you can find the alphabetical listing is not alphabetical, but out of order. -The camera work could be better. The video sometimes get out of focus. And it can have jumps, which should be edited better. Really, Jay Rock should hire a videographer to shoot the videos, which would make the videos better, except he probably figures the videos are good enough without the expense of hiring a videographer. -There is no text file to explain the plot. But most videos have the same plot of the step-daughter seducing the step-father. Or a step-brother having sex with his step-sister. -Few tags to describe the video. So searching by tags is not worthwhile. -There are no model bios for the channel. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: Reasons for joining Adult Time (which has a Spank Monster channel) instead of joining the original Spank Monster site: -Membership in the original Spank Monster site is expensive. 12-month membership is $150. You can join Adult Time for $95/year, or less if you join on a holiday discount. -Spank Monster site is streaming only. Spank Monster channel includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Actually, there is a daily limit of 300GB at Adult Time, but unless you are a porn fanatic trying to download the entire network, that limit should never affect you. So I consider that unlimited downloads, rather than having to state in every review of the network that there is a 300 GB daily download limit. -If you join the Adult Time network, you get access to over 55,000 hardcore videos, and over 50,000 photo galleries. Covering a wide variety of porn niches, with 1,000s of porn models. If you join Spank Monster site, you gain access to over 100 videos, featuring about 100 porn models. So Spank Monster site has limited content, compared to Adult Time, which has a huge amount of content. Enough said. The advantages of Adult Time over Spank Monster site are self-evident. The Spank Monster channel has 53 videos. This is 44% of the 120 videos at the Spank Monster site. The models at Spank Monster are mainly cute young teens. Mostly white. You do have a few Black, Asian, Latino models, but very few. Spank Monster channel has 53 videos. The runtime for a video is around 33 minutes. The videos are available for streaming and/or download in 160p or 240p through 2160p. There is an accompanying photo set for each video. The photo sets have about 15 pictures per set. There is a zip file for the photo sets, that downloads with a generic file name, such as 120595.zip. So you have to re-name the file, if you want to add the model's name, date posted, site, etc. But I don't know if the sets are worth collecting: -The models are cute, but the set is a small number of photos. -Some photos can be out of focus, or poorly framed. -The main use of a photo set would be to download the set, pick the best photo that shows the model in a pose you like, and keep that photo with the video, to illustrate what the model looks like. And delete the rest of the photo set. Spank Monster is a new site, started in 2021. But in a sense, it's a clone of the Jays POV site. Not a true clone, but the videos at the site (and Adult Time channel) follow the same plot that the Jays POV videos follow: -You have a stunt cock (Jay Rock) who plays the step-daddy who is seduced into having sex with his step-daughter. -Or Jay Rock can play the step-brother who has faux incest sex (faux, because these are step-relations, not blood relations) with his step-sister. - Jay Rock is the stunt cock at Spank Monster, and also the stunt cock at Jays POV. He opened this site because another site will add revenue to his wealth, but there's no difference between this site/channel and the Jays POV site in theme or plot. So unless you are a super-fan of Jay Rock, join the Adult Time network for your Jay Rock fix. Bottom Line Summary: Forget the repetitious plots. The lame dialogue. The sometimes poor POV camera work. Some of these cute teens are so fucking adorable you wish you could be the one in bed with them instead of Jay Rock. The girls put on a good show of seducing Jay Rock. The videos are good to excllent. Mainly because of the cuteness of the models, but the videos are professionally shot from the POV viewpoint, which is not the greatest. I prefer a standard shooting technique which gives you better camera angles. But the sets are expensive, and the technical features (lighting, sound control) are good to excellent. I'm giving the Spank Monster channel of the Adult Time network a score of 90. Mainly because of how cute the girls are. I don't like the POV camera-work, the lame scripts and dialogue. So your personal score could be lower. 07-10-21  06:00pm Replies (0) Review 122 My Pervy Family (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Note: this review is based on the Adult Time channel of My Pervy Family. There is a separate site for My Pervy Family, that is has more content than the My Pervy Family channel at Adult Time. But the stand-alone My Pervy Family is basically a streaming-only site. You can buy downloads at the My Pervy Family site, but that becomes very expensive. And the streaming-only membership is not cheap to begin with: See the bottom line section of this review for more details on why the My Pervy Family site is expensive. -Video definition runs from 160p or 288p through 2160p. -The sets are nice and clean: no low-rent apartments, normal clothes. Good lighting. -There is a plot or story to the videos: it's like POV, you're watching these people interact with each other. It's not all sex, it's also people living together, trying to get along. The sex is the main selling point, of course, but the stories can be interesting or funny. -Support is FameSupport, one of the finest support teams. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Support is 24/7. With live chat, email, telephone. I recommend the live chat option, fast response. -Videos download with default filename of title, model, definition. You only have to add channel and posting date. CONS(START OF): -Pre-checked cross-sale. -Payment processor is proprietary, part of fameaid, but it's a solid processor, and I've dealt with them for years and never had a problem. -My Pervy Family uses a POV filming style, which can be jumpy. My guess is they need a more professional guy at the camera, or a better editor. -There is a 300 GB daily limit for downloads. Which is a huge amount of data to download in a single day. -No text description of the video. No tags to describe the video (for search or sort). -There's so much content at Adult Time, that navigating the channel and network can have problems. They really need to have an expert re-design the network to make navigation easier. They keep adding, not just new content to each channel, Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): but new channels as well. They are more focused on creating a massive porn network instead of making the content easier to find and use. The network was massive almost from the beginning when it was first created, and it's like a fucking monster that is spreading its tentacles in all directions, without a basic structure that is easy to use. Trying to get a simple chronlogical listing of the contents of each channel is a task for an expert: I would use the network more if I could find the content I want to see more easily. -No bio on the models. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): PU and TBP sites show a discounted price of $24.99/month and $99.99/year for the My Pervy Family site. But if you use the links from PU and TBP to go to the My Pervy Family site, the join page shows $24.99/month and $75/6 months. And that is for streaming only. Downloads cost extra, and you have to pay for each download, there is no upgrade for unlimited downloads. If you join Adult Time, you have unlimited streaming and downloads for the My Pervy Family channel. The Adult Time channel for My Pervy Family has most of the video content of the My Pervy Family site. So unless you are a real fan of the My Pervy Family site, the better choice is to join Adult Time, and you get unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads of most of the My Pervy Family videos. Plus you get a boatload of additional hardcore porn that is very high quality with an Adult Time membership. Note: Adult Time does have a streaming-only membership, for a lower price. But I recommend joining Adult Time with the yearly term, because I believe Adult Time is one of the best bargains in hardcore porn today. I am an especial fan of the Pure Taboo channel at Adult Time, I think it's the finest plot-driven porn site on the internet. Pure Taboo features twisted desires with a cinematic approach, with high production values and excellent acting for a porn site. I did a review of the Filthy POV channel of Adult Time. That channel features twisted sex, with a trailer-trash approach. You compare Filthy POV channel with the Pure Taboo channel, and it's like comparing Ptomaine Tommy to Filet Mignon. Or if you're too young to understand the reference, it's like comparing rotting meat to fine cuisine. Pure Taboo is high class twisted-desire porn. If you're on a budget, or even if you have plenty of cash to throw into porn, joining Adult Time to get access to most of the My Pervy Family videos, instead of joining the My Pervy Family site itself, seems like a no-brainer to me. The advantages of the My Pervy channel include lower membership price, downloading privileges, and access to a huge supply of high quality hardcore porn from the Adult Time network. What are the main benefits of the My Pervy Family channel: -In a world filled with pain, the channel focuses on the love between step-relatives, creating a warm feeling of how you can become a better person by caring for your loved ones. Piper June is a young teen who feels insecure about her small boobs. But her step-brother feels her titties and says they are fine. Later, he plays with her pussy and shoots his load over her. Leaving both the brother and step-sister satisfied. Or Melody Marks, a lovely young model with girl-next-door looks. She has a good-looking step-brother who's back from college. The next morning, he wakes her up and they talk on her bed, he's sleepy, she's missed him so much, so they start cuddling. Then kissing. Then it's not enough, and she's on top of him, and she wants more, a lovely girl, a handsome guy, one of the best scenes in the channel. I'm giving My Pervy Family a score of 88. The models are cute teens or early twenties (as step-daughters, but you get young-old with the step-mother, step-father sex with the step-children). The sets are nice. The technical features are good (lighting, sound, etc.). Navigation is just OK, but could be better. The main improvement needed is better navigation. 06-25-21  04:17am Replies (0) Review 123 Filthy POV (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -The stand-alone Filthy POV site is streaming only. But the Adult Time channel for Filthy POV has both unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading (if you have downloading privileges with your membership in Adult Time). -The stand-alone Filthy POV site content is supposed to be exclusive. But the Adult Time channel for Filthy POV has some content from other sites mixed in, so it's not entirely exclusive. -All scenes are available in 360p SD through 1080p. And they are now offering 4K definition for people with ultra-high definition monitors. -Some scenes might have a plot that adds to the interest: A brother might blackmail his stepsister into having sex. However, many of the videos at the Filthy POV channel seem to have the plot cut out, and the scenes start with off with hardcore sex, with no buildup. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Some videos have an accompanying phtoset. But the photoset is poor-quality screen shots: poor lighting, cheap sets, a limited number of screen shots per set. Not worth collecting, even when the model is cute. -Photosets average around 15 screenshots per set. -The level of attractiveness of the models is below average. The site is going for a trailer-trash vibe, not presenting the models as attractive women, but as sluts who are getting banged. -There is no text description of a video. -There are no tags to describe or define the video. -Little to none model info. Bottom Line: 124 videos currently. Video runtime is from 10 to 20 minutes. My guess is that they've edited the original videos to cut out the build-up to the sex, and start many of the videos with the sex scenes. Which is both good and bad: good, for fans who want to skip the buildup and view the hardcore sex. Bad, because the the buildup could give meaning to the sex. Without the plot build-up, the scene is just two or more bodies having sex, with very little meaning. You have Dixie Lynn, Sofie Reyez, Karah Brooke, Jocelyn Stone, Melody Marks, cute or attractive girls, sucking cock, but there's no basis for the sex, and it gets boring fast. I much prefer the Jays POV channel in Adult Time, which makes an effort of selecting cute teen models, and also includes a plot build-up where the stunt cock seduces the girls into having sex, or the girl seduces the guy. The sets and costumes at Jays POV are nicer, not trying for the trailer trash vibe. The lighting and colors of the videos at Jays POV are brighter, and the girls look so much better. Filthy POV is a channel in the Adult Time network. It's also a standalone site. I'm writing about the Filthy POV channel in the Adult Time network. Which apparently has a lot of the video content found in the separate Filthy POV site. Note: some of the videos that are listed under the Filthy POV channel are originally from other sites. A few from FilthyKings, RoccoSiffredi, Spizzo.com. But most of the content is from the FilthyPOV site. Most of the models are white, but you get some latina, some black. Most of the models are probably in their twenties, but you get some teens, some grannies. These models are not selected for their looks, unless you consider trailer trash as the target look. You get a wide variety of themes in this channel, and a wide variety of female performers. The overall theme is trailer trash: slutty models, young and old, who are showing the dirty side of sex. Fake incest: step-relations having sex. Teen and twenty-something models having sex with young and older guys. Grannies. Lots of models with tats. Cuckold. Punishment. Blowjobs. Anal. Oversized titties. Whatever. The models are basically shown as sluts who like their sex down and dirty. No attempt is made to make the models attractive or glamorous. There are a few cute teen models in the catalog who seem to have wandered into the site by mistake, but they show they belong in this site because they have fake-incest with their step family or show other perversions. If you're into dirty sex, perverted sex, then you can watch in 4K video, which should satisfy connoisseurs of raw hardcore porn. I'm giving the Filthy POV channel a score of 78. I don't appreciate the trailer-trash vibe of the site. I don't like the editing that cuts out the build-up to the sex. I like my models to be young and attractive, and the models at this site are basically a much less attractive group of women than the Jays POV models. The plots at Jays POV site can be repetitious, but the models are yummy, and the sets and lighting are clean. The sets at Filthy POV are cheap, the models are presented at sluts, the lighting is dim. 06-23-21  07:03pm Replies (0) Review 124 She Is Nerdy (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Site is part of the Dirty Flix network. If you join through the She Is Nerdy site, you will pay $30/month, or $120/year. But if you join through the Dirty Flix site directly, you can normally find discounted prices of $15/month or $60/year. I joined through Dirty Flix for $60/year. Joining through She Is Nerdy and/or Dirty Flix gives you access to the same sites. -The videos have your choice for downloading of low, medium and high definition. And since November 2016 they added 4K definition for downloading. But for online streaming, they stream at 240p, 720p, or 1080p. There is no 4K option for streaming, even on the newest videos. -There is an accompanying screen shot set for each video. The zip file comes in only one definition. The screen shot sets vary between 40 to about 80 screen shots. These are screen shots, not photos. -No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Unusual. I looked all over for a pre-checked cross-sale, but finally realized there wasn't any. Cons: -On the public page, it tells you you have 5 video previews, to see what the quality of a video looks like. Except, when you click on a video preview link, instead of watching a video preview, it brings up the join page, where the prices shown are expensive: $30/month, or $120/year. Two cons: the prices shown are expensive. instead of viewing a sample preview, you get the join page. Where's the sample preview? You have to join the site to see the video. Ha-ha. Joke is on you. -The login and member pages are non-secure. Your browser will probably have a popup notice stating "This conection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised." -There are no video previews in the members area. If you want to know what the video is about, you can look at the thumbnail screen shots, or you can read the generic text description which tells you a model will get fucked by a stunt cock. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): There is minimal plot to most of these videos: You have a cute girl who starts off wearing glasses (which is supposed to show she is a nerdy girl), you've got a young stunt cock who's got sex on his brain (these are Russians, remember), they touch, they kiss, then it's off to teen hardcore heaven. -Irregular update rate. From 2 to 4 new videos per month. But if you count the accompanying screenshot sets, that means 4 to 8 new items per month. -Verotel is the default payment processor that I used. Not as widely known as CCBill or Epoch, but a trusted name in high-risk payment processing (the classification for porn pay sites). -There are ads on every member page, but that's standard to most porn sites. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site stats: Movies: 121 Photosets: 121 Models: around 121 Site launched in 2014 Videos run about 20 to 30 minutes The photosets are screenshot sets, not photosets, since the contents of a set are screen shots. Screen shots are lower quality than photos. The definition is usually less. The focus is not as good, the composition of the image is normally less artistic. Site theme: nerdy girls having sex. What makes a girl nerdy? She is wearing glasses. That's all it takes. And sometimes the girls aren't even wearing glasses. You have to take the site's idea that any girl can be nerdy. And most of the girls at the site are cute teens (or early twenties) who are wet inside and ready to milk your cock with their mouth and pussy and even their ass. Let me emphasize how cute and hot these teens are. You would think the sex would get repetitous and boring very fast. But if you're into attractive teen girls like I am, the videos are more than watchable, they can be arousing. The site (and most of the network) does a fine job selecting cute teen models who put on a show for you. These girls are almost all featured at competing teen hardcore sites, like Nubiles.net, Nubiles Porn, Team Skeet, Teen Mega World, Twistys, etc. Some of them can even appear at MetArt. The plot or setup to the sex is usually minimal. The screenshot sets are usually not worth collecting, even if the models are attractive, because the quality of the screenshot is not good or just OK. But the videos are definitely worth collecting. The models are cute, the images are clear and crisp, the video does a fine to excellent job capturing how attractive these young girls are. The models don't wear a lot of makeup, the sets are not expensive but not overly cheap, the video is like a slice of life of what you'd like to see (and do) if you were a teen or early twenties person again with one of these lovely young women. This isn't glamcore or heartcore, but it's a closer to slice of life of what you wish you had been exposed to as a young man. Although many of the model and stunt cocks are Russian or from that region, there are some from America. So some videos do have English dialogue. But dialogue, or its lack, is a minor element in the videos. Although I enjoy plot-driven porn, especially when it's done well, any plot is a minor factor in these videos. You've got a nubile girl and a guy that wants to get his rocks off. It's not rough, crude, or over the top sex. Instead, it's two young people enjoying each other without guilt or any other baggage. Occasionally there is a touch of romance, if you want to consider kissing and holding hands romance before the hardcore sex. But the site focuses on the hardcore sex. The site and network has a simple structure that is easy to navigate. There is a search engine, if you want to check the video for a title you've seen. There are hot links for all the model's content at the network, once you click on her name. The models themselves, as I've stated, are young white teen- or early-twenties- girls who are mainly attractive. Little effort is put into presenting them attractively, but they are naturally young and attractive to begin with: they don't need much make-up, expensive sets, glamourous costumes, or extensive lighting. I'm giving the site a score of 90. The site focuses on teen girls who are into sex. The videos are mainly bread-and-butter hardcore sex, but I enjoy them. If hardcore teen sex is not your niche, you would score the site lower, and would probably be bored with it. I regard the simple plots, or lack of them, as a positive, because most porn starlets are poor actors. There's no problem with a stupid plot, because there's almost no plot in these videos. You have a girl and a guy, they meet or are together, and they have sex. 06-19-21  05:45am Replies (0) Review 125 Teeny Lovers (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -The models are attractive teens. Site (and 18Videoz network) does a great job finding cute young teens. Some girls might be in their early twenties, but these girls look young (but still legal). -There is a text description of the video that is brief but covers the minor plot. There's almost no plot. You have a guy, a girl, and they've got sex on the brain. You have to admire these Russians, they don't waste a lot of time on non-essentials before getting to the sex. -The tags also do a fine job tagging the action. -Navigation is simple and easy. The site structure is basic: not a lot of bells and whistles, but that's good, because the site focuses on giving you a lot of hot teen sex. -You are allowed to comment on the videos. And the comments can be worth reading. They show that the members really appreciate how attractive these models are, how hot the sex can be. The sex is straight-forward, not over-the-top acrobatics, almost no seduction or build-up, but these models are cute. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): And you don't need a plot or seduction to enjoy watching these teens expose their bodies and get it on. I don't know why it doesn't get boring. At many competing sites, the sex can get boring because of stupid plots and poor acting. Here, you focus on these teen models, their fine bodies, and it's fucking erotic. -A very long time before you are logged out for site inactivity. -Unlimited streaming. -Unlimited downloads. -All videos are available in low, medium and high definition. 4K definition was introduced in late 2016. CONS(START OF): -This is strange. The login can be secure or non-secure. Once you get to the members area, the members pages can be secure or non-secure. I've never seen a network where this happens. Normally you have secure login and member pages, or login and members pages are non-secure. But not at this network. -The photosets are disappointing. They are low quality screen shots not worth collecting. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -There is a zip file for the photosets. But it's in only one definition. -The default file name of the downloaded screenshot zip file is the title of the video. So if you do want to collect these photosets, you have to manually add the model's name, date posted, and site. -When I open a photo from the photoset, and try to manually go through the photos, the photos don't show in order: instead, the photos appear in a random manner. The photos in a set are numbered 1 through XX (up to 100), but they display in a random order, or they don't play in a slide show properly. I check to see that I haven't selected "random order", and the program is set for a normal slideshow. But the screen shots do not display in normal order. I test to see if my program is working, with a photoset from Metart or Domai, and those sets display normally. But not the sets from Teeny Lovers. The problem seems to be the decoding embedded in the screen cap files. -Another odd thing about the screen cap files: I open a screen cap file, it's a jpg file. It shows the method is deflated. But the computer does not show/allow the dimensions of the file, which most photosets do allow. The computer shows the file is 649 KB, which is a large size for a jpg file. But no dimensions/definition are shown. Not only do the screen shot files take a lot of storage space, but they hide the security and details that are shown on most photoset files. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Number of videos: 502. Videos are available in your choice of definition of low, medium, high, higher, and UHD. UHD was made available starting in late 2016. Photosets (really screen shot sets): 50 to 100 screen shots per set. Number of photosets: 502 (one photoset for each video). Number of updates per month: 3 or 4 videos(with accompanying photoset). Teeny Lovers is a good-sized site: 502 videos. You also get access to about 17 other sites in the network. The site (and network) is teen orientated. The main strength of the site (and network) is how cute most of these teens are. If you are into teens, you've seen these teens at such sites as Teen Mega World, Wow sites, Team Skeet, etc. There are also a few that have been featured at the Metart network. The simple navigation is also a plus factor for the site and network. The site is easy to navigate. You can switch between sites in the network, without having to re-login. The content for each model is brought at the network is brought up when you click on the model's name. There is a model's page, that gives you a nice thumbnail of the model and a brief listing of her physical attributes, including her date of birth. If you want to join, join through the 18Videoz site: There are discounts for joining the 18Videoz site that should be easy to find: I paid $60/year. There is also a $15/month option. Both of these choices include full streaming and unlimited downloads. If you join through the Teeny Lovers site, or one of the other sites in the network, you will probably pay a much higher price, maybe even double. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites that require extra payment. I definitely think Teeny Lovers (and the 18 Videoz network) are worthwhile joins. Mainly because of the very attractive teen models. The site/network is easy to use. If you are into hardcore teen, this site is worth joining. The plots are simple, they don't put much effort into making the models attractive. But these are young teens who are naturally attractive, they were selected because they are attractive, and willing and able to display their charms on video. It's bread-and-butter sex, not glamour or sensual, but can be hot. And the models are yummy. 06-19-21  05:07am Replies (0) Shown : 101-125 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.37 seconds.