Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : LKLK (0)

Feedback:   All (518)  |   Reviews (162)  |   Comments (40)  |   Replies (316) Other:   Replies Received (290)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 126-150 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 126 LetsDoeIt (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Exclusive content. -This is an excellent glamour network with lots of lovely models. The selection of models ranges from merely attractive to fucking gorgeous. The star of the network is The White Boxxx, where they made an art form of taking attractive girls and presenting them as lovely as any movie star at her premiere. They use expensive sets, erotic lingerie, wonderful lighting, and smooth, professional videos that emphasize how lovely these models are. -The background music at The White Boxxx is usually soft. Background music at other sites in the network can be loud, jarring. Meant to add some excitement to the video, but I find loud music to be distracting, and need to turn the volume down to make it less annoying. -Runtime is around 20 - 30 minutes for a video. -Some of the featured models include: Agatha Vega, Anna ReyAriela Donovan, Arya Fae, Freya Mayer, Jessica Spielberg, Julia Red, Kenna James, Lena Reif, Lika Star, Liya Silver, Lola Myluv, Lovita Fate, Lucy Li. Cons: -Flash page of ads before you get into the members area. Even after you hit the link, "Continue to members area", what opens, instead of a members area page, is another ad. Do these people understand English, or are they so focused on selling they think you're going to going to sign up for a site instead of wanting to view content you already paid for? -Of course, there are also ads on every member page. What a suprise. -Some of the ads are "Limited time offer". And there is a clock ticking down the time the offer is still valid. I don't have enough excitement in my life. This adds to the thrill, watching the ad before it expires. (Sarcasm). However, the ad starts with 19 hours 59 minutes. So I have plenty of time to think over the offer before it expires. However, I already have a membership in Nubiles Porn, so the ad is wasted on me. -They've reduced the time limit that logs you out of the network. Minor annoyance, since it's easy to log back in, Bottom Line: CONS CONTINUED: and you get to see the flash page of ads again, before you can navigate to the members area. -It gets boring watching the same intro section of each video that showcases the network, time after time, so there's a link that lets you skip the intro. -The sex can be slow and sensual at the start, because they are trying to create erotic content, a visual feast. But the girls are so lovely, scenes can lack heat. Some scenes at Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, Teen Fidelity just have greater impact. But for pure visual splendor of the models, the settings, The White Boxxx is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. -There is a monthly limit of 100 video downloads for the network. -A personal issue: a lot of the lovely models have tattoos. Some of the models have large tattoos that cover a lot of their body. I'm not a fan of tattoos. Think they distract from the model's beauty. -Photo sets are tiny. Around 6 to 10 photos per set. The photos are from the accompanying video. These lovely models deserve more photos in a set. The photo sets are basically a wasted opportunity of these girls. -All videos are offered in 240p through 1080p. Which is suprising for a glamcore network. Competing sites started offering 4K definition in 2015 or 2016. -Network update rate is slow, about 10 to 14 new videos per month. -Navigation can be clunky. You hit the back button, and you can be logged out of the site. Or you're still in the site, but you've lost your place in the site listing (you have to use clicks to get back the page you were viewing). -Most sites don't update. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. BOTTOM LINE: Lets Doe It network has 17 sites: The different sites are meant to offer different porn themes: The White Boxxx-333 scenes, the star of the network, is pure glamcore porn, one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet. Lovely models, videotaped in lush sets, excellent lighting that highlights the beauty of the models, expensive costumes. A girl knows-200 scenes, a glamcore lesbian site. Her Limit-151 scenes, a hardcore site featuring aggressive sex that pushes the models to the limit. Horny Hostel-54 scenes, sex in a hostel. Xchimera-35 scenes, fantasy sex that is supposed to be taboo. There were 35 scenes in Jan 2020. Then they supposedly updated the site in 2020 with 7 more scenes, but the count remained at 35. My guess is they did not update the site, just changed the posting date of 7 scenes to 2020. Which seems deceptive. Scam Angels-50 scenes. Girls have sex with rich guys, then blackmail them. Bitches Abroad-100 scenes. Girls travelling to different countries have sex with local studs. Porno Acadamie-36 scenes. High school girls have sex in France. Bums Bus-134 scenes. German girls have sex with guys who drive a van. An acquired taste. The van drivers are jerks who think they are really cool. XXX Shades-124 scenes. Sex that is supposed to be erotic, based on the Fifty Shades of Grey movies. Doe Projects-36 scenes. Pilots for possible series. Relaxxxed-130 scenes. Massage videos. Kinky In-Laws-30 scenes. Faux incest with step-families. My Naughty Album-70 scenes. Sex between a model and her photographer in a photoshoot. Bums Buero-53 scenes. Office sex. Quest for Orgasm-80 scenes. Girl solo masturbation. Bums Besuch-27 scenes. German fans get to have sex with porn stars. Most of the sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years. The network update rate is low: maybe 10+ videos in a month. There are lots of really attractive models featured at the sites. And the videos, for the most part, are crystal clear images. The best sites are The White Boxxx, a great glamcore site. A Girl Knows, a glamcore lesbian site. Her Limit, extreme sex site, Horny Hostel, sex in a hostel, Bitches Abroad, where girls travelling to a foreign country hook up with a local stud, XXX Shades, where there's an element of BDSM, all have some worthwhile videos to watch. Mainly because the girls are so attractive. Because of the slow update rate, because most sites are not updating, the 100 video download limit per month, I'm giving the network a score of 85. If they increase the update rate, once the covid infection has passed, remove the 100 video/month download limit, improve the navigation, increase the time before you're logged out, decrease the amount of ads, the score would improve. All these negatives mean the score is in the 80's range, where it used to be in the 90's. They are making the network harder to use, for no reason that I can tell. 05-30-21  01:45pm Replies (0) Review 127 Dirty Flix (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -They've increased the thumbnail sizes on the public preview page, and made the thumbnails brighter, so the models, which are mostly cute teens to begin with, look more attractive. -Dirty Flix is a network with 15 sites. You get access to all the sites, there are no sites you have to pay extra for. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -You can view the photo sets in an online slideshow, or download a zip file of the photo set. -The network has hundreds of cute teens. Cons: -Regular membership is expensive. The listed price is $30/month, or $120/year. But you can find discounts that allow you to join for $15/month, or $60/year. I paid $60/year. -Login is not secure. You get a popup warning you, when you enter your login details, "This conection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised." Which is poor. The only way to get into the members area is through a non-secure gateway. Note: sometimes you click on the login link, and you are directly entered into the non-secure members area, without having to enter your login details (with cookies enabled). But I would assume that is still open to hacking. -A lot of videos/photo sets that are posted here are also posted at Videoz network, which is run by the same people. So it increases the update rate at both networks, using the same content. -The login details (username and password) are computer generated. So have to write them down, you can't remember a nonsense string. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -The photo sets only have one definition for the zip file. But because of the poor quality of the screen caps, even if the model is cute, I don't think the sets are worth collecting. These are screen caps. The lighting varies wildly, from poor to good. The quality of the sets also varies wildly: the sets are an improvement from years ago, but can be cheap to nice. -The photo set zip file downloads with the title of the video. But you have to manually add the model's name, the date posted, the name of the site. -Ads on every member page. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Network stats: Movies: 1390. Models: 727. Photo sets: 1391. Number of screen shots per photo set: around 50 to 80. The photo sets are made from the accompanying video. The photo sets are screen shots. The quality of the photo sets can vary from poor to good. The photo sets at the Wow network (a competing network) are real photos that are really excellent, much higher quality. The photo sets at Teen Mega World (a different competing network) are better quality than the Dirty Flix screen caps. The Dirty Flix network needs to invest in a good software program that will make better photos from their videos. The screen caps are better than what low-cost porn networks used to post many years ago, but compared to what competing hardcore teen sites offer, the Dirty Flix photo sets are usually lower quality. Dirty Flix and 18Videoz are two networks offered by the same people. The two networks are similar. Both are hardcore teen. The network structure is the same for both networks. They even have the same ads for other sites at both networks. If I had to join one network, I would choose the 18Videoz network. It has more content. 3,308 movies versus 1390. 2,249 models versus 1390. 18 sites versus 15 sites. Both networks have a site structure that is easy to use. With a lot of attractive teen models. And a low membership price, if you find the $15/month or $60/year prices. Both networks started off offering videos with low, medium and high definition. Both networks upgraded their video player around May 2016. Both network started offering 4K definition videos in November 2016. Both sites offer a sorted video listing by newest, longest, or highest rated. Both sites switched to a hot link of their models, where clicking on the model's name brings up her video content at the network. I guess that Dirty Flix will soon offer a secure login, since 18Videoz now offers a secure login. The 18Videoz network is strange: sometimes, the login is secure, sometimes it's non-secure. I'm guessing 18Videoz is switching over to secure access, and haven't finished the conversion completely. And since both networks have followed the same upgrades over the years, I assume that Dirty Flix will offer a secure login and secure member pages in the near future. I'm giving Dirty Flix a score of 85. The 18Videoz network has more content, and more models. But both networks have the same structure that is easy to use. 05-29-21  02:29pm Replies (0) Review 128 Young Libertines (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Young Libertines is part of the 18 Videoz network. You get access to 18 different sites. Note: if you join directly through Young Libertines, you pay $29.95/month, or $119.95/year. If you join through 18Videoz, you pay (with a PU discount) $14.95/month, or $59.95/year. Both memberships give you access to the same sites. So do yourself a favor and join through 18Videoz. -They have really improved the technical features of the videos. And the quality of the sets. The clothes the models and stunt cocks wear are not expensive, but not cheap. They are regular clothes, which goes along with the upgraded videos you see at the site. The videos are now really nice. And watching a video can be very different from the older videos: it's like you're watching a video in real-life: a lovely young teen takes a shower, her hands stroke her body, slightly suggestive, but not getting into masturbation. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): She finishes the shower, puts on some clothes, a boy comes over, they kiss, and then have sex. The sex is plain vanilla; but the girl is attractive, and the sex is real, not over-the-top theatrics. -You have a choice of streaming and downloading in low, medium or high definition. The newer videos offer a 4K definition (starting in November 2016). -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -The site is not glamour. The models don't wear a lot of make-up, the clothes are regular street clothes. But the teens are mainly fresh young teens, attractive to really lovely. The videos are crystal clear, nicely focused, and the girls are mainly attractive to fucking yummy. -The videos have lots of tags to describe the action. The text description is not as good, it's more generic that doesn't really tell you much. -You click on a model's name, and links to all her video content at the network appear. Bottom Line: CONS(START OF): -The thumbnails for the videos are disappointing. They are small, and on the video listing, don't give you a clear picture of the model. But on the individual video listing, the photo is very large (12" by 7" on 27" monitor) and gives you a clear picture of the model. However, the flesh tones and the photo could be improved to present the model more attractively. -It's confusing. Sometimes member pages are secure. Sometimes they are not secure. I don't think I've ever seen a site where you see mixed pages of secure and non-secure member pages. Let me explain: if one member page is secure, all the member pages will be secure for that login. If a member page is not secure, all the member pages will be non-secure for that login. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -18Videoz and DirtyFlix are run by the same people. A lot of the videos (and the accompanying photo sets) are posted at both networks. This increases the update rate at both networks. But it reduces the value of having a membership at both sites. -Most videos and photo sets have a yellowish tinge. Which is disappointing. I don't know if this is due to lighting or a filter. Natural colors would improve the videos/photo sets a lot. -Login details are computer generated. -The photo set are screen shots. The zip file provided only has one definition. -Slow update rate. Used to be about 2 videos per month. But has slowed to 1 video per month. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): 608 Movies. So there's a lot of content for the site. The network has 3,308 movies. The site has 2,249 models. You can sort the movies by newest, top rated, runtime. Videos normally run 20 to 30 minutes. Photo sets have around 50 to 80 photos. These are screen shots, OK to nice quality, usually nicely focused. But these girls are attractive, they really deserve a photographic record of the shoot. The level of attractiveness of the models is one of the main strengths of the network. The low membership price ($60/year, with a PU discount if you join through the PU link to 18Videoz), plus the high level of attractiveness of the models, plus the large amount of content (over 600 videos at the site, over 3300 at the network), make this a worthwhile join. The plots are simple or non-existent: a girl meets a boy, they go to his apartment, start to kiss, then fuck. Or a boy comes over to the girl's apartment and they kiss and fuck. Or they start in the apartment, kissing and fucking. It doesn't get much simpler than that. No elaborate seduction. Almost no foreplay. Just a kiss or two, if that much, before the get to licking each other's crotch, or sucking and fucking. So don't expect story-driven plots. These young teens are primed and ready to fuck. Which might get repetitious, except they are young, attractive, and filled with a sex drive that ignores taboos and guilt. I really enjoy Pure Taboo, a competing site (part of the Adult Time network), which is probably the finest story-driven site with dark sex (sex with guilt). But Young Libertines (and other sites in that network) is a nice change from Pure Taboo, filled with attractive teen girls who enjoy fucking. Pure Taboo is higher quality in production values, and gives you a cinematic experience. But a lower membership price makes Young Libertines an attractive alternative. I enjoy watching attractive young teens displaying their charms. And some of the models at the Young Libertines site and network are fucking attractive. Note: forget the site title: Young Libertines. These are young girls that want to have fun. They are not flouting moral rules, which is what the old-time libertines were supposed to do. Flouting the rules was part of the thrill. The Young Libertine site shows girls that are into sex as a way to have fun. 05-27-21  08:08am Replies (0) Review 129 Moms Teach Sex (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU shows a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring. -Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 17 different sites. -Unlimited streaming and downloading privileges for the videos and photo sets. -The technical features of the videos and photo sets are excellent: clear, crisp images, good to excellent flesh-tones of the models, nice sets, good lighting, good focus. -There is a photo set for each video. -Videos and photo sets come in your choice of multiple definitions. -Site navigation is easy. -Multiple tags and a text description describe the plot of each scene. -Content is exclusive. Cons: -The poor acting level of the models, the stupid scripts and dialogue are strong negatives that negate the technical qualities of the videos. -The level of attractiveness of the models (both the teens and MILFs) is below average for the network. Princess Cum, Nubiles Casting, Petite HD Porn, Petite Ballerinas Fucked, Nubiles.net, all have teen models that are far more attractive. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Advertising for competing sites and for the Nubiles Porn network take up a good part of the real estate of every member page. The good thing about the advertising for the Nubiles Porn network is that each hot link serves as a link to open that particular site. Bottom Line: Site stats: Number of videos: 147 Runtimes: most videos run from 20 to 40 minutes. All videos available in definition from 270p through 1080p. Newer videos starting Oct 18, 2020 have a 4K option. Photo sets have from 28 to 200 photos per set. Site theme: Faux incest: a step-mother has sex, either with her step-daughter, or her step-son, or with her step-child and her step-child's sex partner. So there's some old-young appeal, teen niche, milf niche, lesbian element. Because you have women in their 30s and 40s, you have a wider selection of body types beyond the slender teenagers. The site falls into the reality porn niche, except when I watch these videos, they seem fake as hell. That's because of the poor acting abilities of the models and the stunt cocks, and the poor scripts, which are unbelievable. ========= Edit: I am confused about faux incest. I've read on the internet that laws regarding incest vary considerably between jurisdictions. In many areas, legally, there is no difference between an adopted child and a biological child for incest. To make that clear, an adopted child cannot marry the daughter or son of his adoptive parents, because the effect of the adoption order is to create a blood relationship between them. I don't know why so many sites show fake incest (what I call fake incest, which is sex between step-relatives). Most sites make it very clear there is no blood relation between the sex partners, but there is a step-relation between the sex partners. So even though these are actors, not real blood relations and not real step-relatives, the sex between step-relatives would be illegal. So what's the point of making it clear that the actors are playing step-relatives instead of blood relatives? Since, legally, a step-relative is a blood relative? In some jurisdictions, adopted siblings who are related by adoption only, but not by blood, can marry. But that interpretation seems to be very limited. ========= The main strengths of the site: -You get access to all 17 sites of the Nubiles Porn network. -The videos are professionally shot: Clear, crisp imagery, good lighting, nice sets, nice sound control. -Easy site navigation. -Easy to switch to a different site in the network. -Relatively low membership price: $14.98/month with a PU discount. The main cons of the site: -The stupid plots. The poor acting. -I don't find the models very attractive. Other sites in the network have more attractive models. -I definitely enjoy many other sites in the network far more than I enjoy this site. This is a personal opinion: I don't enjoy the site. The Nubiles.net site (part of this network) is the main value of the network. That site serves as an encyclopedia of teen porn starlets who are starting out in their careers. There are other sites in the network that are worth viewing. If Milf-teen incest porn is your fantasy, the site might be more pleasing for you. 05-25-21  01:10am Replies (0) Review 130 Daddys Lil Angel (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network. So you get access to 17 different sites. The most valuable site in the network is the Nubiles.net site, which is like an encyclopedia of young porn stars starting out in their porn career. -Tiny site, so navigation is simple to find the entire content. Only 14 videos total. -Videos have your choice of definition for streaming and downloading: from 270p through 1080p. -Videos have an accompanying photo set and screen cap set. -The photo set has 3 zip file definitions: small, medium and large. -You also get a screen cap set of each video. Not sure why a screen cap is useful if you have access to the photo set. Because the screen cap files are large: 1.5 to 2.0 MB each. The photos are slightly better focused than the screen caps, the photo gives you your choice of small, medium or large definition, and even the large definition individual photo is only around 4 MB in file size. So I see no reason to have the screen cap version available. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Unlimited streaming and downloads. -The videos and photosets are clear and crisp. Professional lighting, focus, nice sets. -The tags and text description of each video do an excellent job describing the video. -Content is exclusive. CONS(START OF): -The main con is this is an archive site. The last update was Oct 18, 2018. -Tiny site. 14 videos total. -Lots of ads. The first page you see after you login is a page full of ads. Then, when you click to the members area, you see ads on every member page. But those ads are located near the bottom of the page and can be easily ignored. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Uncheck the cross-sale checkmark, or you will be signed up to a limited trial membership to a different site which turns into an expensive membership within 2 or 3 days. If you do want to join that other site, join with a PU discount if there is one, or join directly, for a much cheaper price. Bottom Line: Site stats: Number of videos: 14 Archive site: last update was Oct 18, 2018. These videos are based on real incidents. That's why they are called reality video. Edit: I was being facetious with my remarks about reality porn. Most reality porn does not use real-life couples. The models can be amateurs or professionals, but the couples are not real-life couples. Just a guy and a girl who are being paid to have sex. Studies have shown that most teenagers have been exposed to porn. So teens are getting at least part of their education about sex from porn. Which is a poor source of information, because most porn is unrealistic fantasy. The site title is Daddy's Lil Angel. But the subtitle, as shown in some videos, is "Teen Anal Porn". Which explains the site focus on anal play. I would assume that Daddy's Lil Angel would be about the fantasy of fathers having taboo sex with their daughters. Apparently the fantasy of fathers having sex with their daughters is borderline illegal. What porn sites show for incest porn is sex between step-relatives. Almost all porn sites that show incest porn make that very clear: it's a step-relative, a step-father, step-mother, step-sister or step-brother, not a blood relative, even though these are all actors anyway, and not related by blood. So the site theme is step-fathers having anal sex with their step-daughters. Which seems like a simple idea to play. Except most porn models are not good actors. And the plots at this site are paper-thin. The step father, for some reason, wants to punish his step daughter, he spanks her, she's excited by the spanking, he's angry and excited by her response, he whips out his cock, shoves it in her mouth, she starts sucking, then it's off to the races with cunnilingus, vaginal and anal sex, etc. The basic plot is the step-daughter does something that ticks off the step-father. This leads to sex, no matter how flimsy the reason. Or for no reason, except this is what the plot says to do: have sex, after showing that the girl is the step-daughter. Really stupid plots. Really poor acting. But you're supposed to turn off your brain and enjoy the nudity and sex. The level of attractiveness of the models is below the standards of the network. They are not ugly, but they're just not as cute or pretty as most of the models at the other network sites. What could they do to improve the site? Choose more attractive models. Models who can act. Use plots that make more sense, or that are more believable. The videos and photo sets are fine technically: crisp, clear imagery, nice sets. But it's wasted on poor content. Or they could just delete the site. Because it seems like wasted space. A wasted theme. I'm giving the site a score of 69. 05-20-21  07:31pm Replies (0) Review 131 Nubile Films (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Login and member pages are secure (https). -The site is easy to use: Simple navigaton for a well-laid out site. Easily visible links for videos, photo sets. -Good search engine. -The models range from attractive to lovely. These are young teen, early 20s girls, who just look gorgeous. The attractiveness of the models is one of the main highlights of the site. -There is a free live cam site. You can watch free shows, can tip the models. -Porn Users has a discounted price of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $19.94/mo. Or $84/year. -Nubile Films comes with 4 bonus sites: Fantasy of the Month, Girls Only Porn, Hot Crazy Mess, and That Sitcom Show. Be sure to check them out to see what you like. The bonus sites only become apparent when you click on the "Sites" link at the top of the member page. Otherwise, you won't realize that you have acccess to the bonus sites. -Newer videos have your choice of definition from 270p through 4K. For both streaming and downloading. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Unlimited streaming and downloading, as far as I can tell. -Your choice of downloading a photo set of each video, in small, medium or high definition. -The site also has a screen cap set of each video. CONS(START OF): The cons are minor. This is an excellent site. -Lots of ads. You have an ad-only page when you enter the site, plus ads on every member page. But some of the site ad prices are low, and might be worth considering. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: The bonus sites: Fantasy of the Month is still updating. Girls Only Porn is still updating. Hot Crazy Mess stopped updating in January 2020. That Sitcom Show stopped updating in September 2019. Site stats: 804 videos. 804 photo sets (1 photo set for each video). (That's not counting the screencap set for each video.) Videos all have 270p through 1080p versions. 4K was added in October 2020 (a very recent addition, compared to competing porn sites). But even the first videos, back in late 2012, are clear, crisp videos with lovely models, great focus, nice sets. -The Nubile Films videos and photo sets are clear, crisp, showcasing the model in living color. This is hardcore porn, but on the softer side. Even after watching the videos, I'd be proud to take these lovely models home with me. They look so soft and innocent. I watch the video titled "For Her Pleasure" with Nessie Blue and Mia Trejsi, two lovely young models. The text description for the video: "Mia Trejsi has found a new playmate in Nessie Blue. The girls barely make it into the doorway of Mia's apartment before Mia presses Nessie against a wall to capture her lips in a kiss. Taking Nessie's hand, Mia leads her submissive new friend to the bedroom where Michael Fly is waiting to complete their hot threesome." The video is hardcore sex, but these girls are so attractive, they make the sex seem like innocent play. There is lesbian sex, anal play, blowjob, facial, spanking, and whatever, but it seems like good, clean fun. And the models faces are so expressive, that it shows they are really enjoying themselves, and letting the audience enjoy as well. Maybe I'm reading more into it than what is here, except that I think the site showcases lovely young models in softcore hardcore that is a joy to watch. I look at the screen cap photos, I can't tell the difference between the screen caps and a real photo. The screen cap sets only come in one sized zip file of 3840x2160px, but I would not know this was a screen cap set, because it looks like a very good photo set. Actually, comparing the screen caps to the photo set, I think the photo set is slightly better focused, but even the screen caps are worth collecting. Except why have 2 photo sets of a video? But the photo sets are definitely worth collecting. The models range from attractive to gorgeous, and the photos are excellent: well lit, nice sets, good focus, the models are lovely, the photos capture the action of the video. Of the 4 bonus sites, only 2 are updating. Fantasy of the Month has 1 or 2 updates per month. The Girls Only Porn site has 3 or 4 updates per month. It's a lesbian site, featuring sex between 2 attractive models. The videos and photo sets and site layout are the same as the Nubile Films site: the videos are clear and crisp, well focused, nice sets, available in 270p through 4K(4K for the most recent videos), with associated photo sets. It's an excellent site, and a welcome addition to the Nubile Films network. I'm giving Nubile Films a score of 95. The girls are lovely, the videos and photo sets are excellent. The site is easy to use. Plus you get the 4 bonus sites. The main value is the Nubile Films site. But the Girls Only Porn site is a nice bonus. 05-20-21  02:33am Replies (0) Review 132 Goddess Nudes (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Simple, basic, non-glamour, softcore solo photo site. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Navigation is simple, based on this is a photoset only site (except for some "Staff Selection" videos and photosets which cost extra to download). -You get low, medium and high definition download and online viewing of the photosets. -Unlimited downloads. -Content is exclusive. Cons: -No videos (except for the limited "Staff Selection" videos, which cost extra to download. -The number of photos per set is surprisingly small. Often less than 50 photos in a set. -Slow update rate. Down to about 2 sets per week. Used to be 5 sets per week, years ago. -High membership price. Used to be $10/month or less, years ago. Then, in 2016, MetArt raised the price to $30/month or $100/year. -No bonus sites (except for the live cam shows). -The photos are high quality, but use a simple, basic style: solo female model, very simple indoor or outdoor setting, non-glamour. A set can start out with a girl wearing inexpensive clothes, or can start out with the girl already nude. But it's not a tease or strip, you are just viewing nude photos of the girl walking around, lying on the floor, I mean, very simple poses. -Pre-ckecked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: Goddess Nudes was started in 2010 by Eolake Stobblehouse, the same man who started and ran Domai for many years. Goddess Nudes was supposed to be a slightly sexier version of Domai. Where the girls show a bit more. I guess I'm blasé, because I can't really tell the difference between Domai and Goddess Nudes. Both sites seem, to me at least, to feature softcore nudity. Both sites mainly feature solo female models, who either disrobe for the camera, or start off nude. There are no men in the photos. The philosophy behind both sites was the innocent enjoyment of nude women. Sharing their beauty. Their joy of living. I think of myself as a meat and potatoes guy. Maybe a purist or connoisseur could tell the difference between the two sites. I can't tell. To me, both sites are essentially similar. The main difference is that the two sites have different names. But any content from one site could have been posted in the other site. In the same manner, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are three different sites. Sharing many or most of the same models. Sharing many or most of the same themes: teen female nudity and sex, softcore and hardcore. The content at any one of the three sites could have been posted at the other two sites. To illustrate this point, a video posted at one site has, in the past, had the accompanying photoset (the photoset that was made during the shooting of the video) posted at the other site: For example a Wow Girls video had the photoset made during that video shoot posted at Wow Porn. And vice versa. So the sites not only shared many or most of the same models, but also shared the same themes, photographers, technical crew, etc. The above is not a criticism of any of sites I mentioned. Domai and Goddess Nudes are fine sites. All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are fine sites, and the three sites are one of my favorite porn networks. Currently, the three sites are marketed as a single network: you join any one of the three sites, and you get access to all three sites. And for several months now, you also get access to Ultra Films, another fine site with the same models from what is now called the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn). The Wow network used to be called the Diesel network years ago. Wow network plus Ultra Films have been having a special for 6 months or more: you can join the Wow network and Ultra Films for $70/year. Which is a great price: I paid more than that for the Wow network, and I paid a separate membership fee for Ultra Films. And now you get all 4 sites for less than I was paying for Wow network. For less than what I paid for Ultra Films. I'm sorry I'm going off-topic in this review. But if you haven't ever joined the Wow network before, or if you have but aren't a current member, I highly recommend joining the Wow network plus Ultra Films, if you can find the special discount of $70/year for the 4 sites. That's if you are a fan of lovely young teens in hardcore action. With some softcore content, as well, but mainly hardcore action. Going back to Goddess Nudes. Goddess Nudes is softcore nudity. Like Domai, Goddess Nudes is photoset only. No videos. Let me explain about the no videos statement: there are a few videos at the site. But they are listed as "Staff Selection". This means that to download any Staff Selection video you have to pay extra to download it. The same Staff Selection videos are also posted at all the MetArt network sites. So the Staff Selection videos are a feature of the MetArt network of sites, and not basically a feature of any one individual MetArt network site. Also, if you are a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you can download all the Staff Selection videos, without paying extra. But that's only if you are a lifetime member. To become a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you normally have to pay $400 to $800, which is a one-time fee. Lifetime members of a site have free access to that site. With full lifetime streaming and downloading privileges. The same setup and features of Domai are repeated at Goddess Nudes: you get limited physical data on the models, but no bios. The update rate used to be 5 updates per week. The same as Domai. But like Domai, the rate has slowed to about 2 updates per week. Most of the models are slender white girls, late teens or early twenties. From the website, the following stats are shown: Number of photosets: 2634 Number of models: 1143 Contributing photographers: 143 Photosets contain from 30 to 100 or more photos. But most sets are under 50 photos. The photography is excellent, but it uses a simple, non-glamorous style: Not a lot of make-up on the models, the clothing is simple, not expensive. You get a mix of indoor and outdoor shoots. Strictly softcore. Solo women only photoshoots. No men allowed. REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE FIRST REPLY SECTION: 05-02-21  02:49pm Replies (2) Review 133 DOMAI (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Large amount of content. Domai was started back in 1997, so it was one of the earliest softcore photo sites on the internet. -Instead of the high-gloss glamour style offered by many photo sites, Domai gives you basic nude softcore photos of young women (18 years old and older). Very little air-brushing that I could tell. -The girls are mainly attractive to very attractive. Many of them are featured in other MetArt sites, as well as other photo sites. -You get many of the same contributing photographers from the MetArt network, so you do get some variety of photographers, except that the overall style is simple nudes, simple costumes, nothing glamourous or exotic. Strictly softcore. -There is a zip file for photoset downloads in low, medium, and high definition. -Content is exclusive. -There is a nice mix of indoor and outdoor sets. -Codec for the photosets is efficient. The high-definition downloads are less than 300 MB, and the low-definition downloads are usually 10 MB or less Cons: -The main con is the price. Domai used to be, many years ago, a low-priced site (less than $10/month) that offered softcore nude photos. But it's now a fully priced site. $29.99/month, or $99.99/year. As a low-priced site, it was worth joining, because it has a large collection of nude models shot in a simple, non-glamorous style. But as a full-priced site, I would hesitate to join, because there are so many competing sites offering glamour-style photography. -Photo only site. No videos. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join. -They are running out of new photosets, so they are using some older content shot years ago. But unless you've been a longtime porn addict, you probably won't realize that some of the content is old. -The online slide-show mechanism is acceptable, but could be improved. You get a cropped photo with a large amount of black-space on both sides of the photo. -Only basic data is provided on a model. Model's age when the set was posted, a few physical attributes. That's it. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Note: the downloaded model data sheet says the age shown is the age of the model when the set was shot. But it's really the age of the model when the set was posted. Which is obvious if you've followed some of these models, who look like teens in the photos, but the stated age is in their 30s. So unless these models have discovered the fountain of youth, you figure the site (and many other sites, due to covid) are using old content and posting it as new updates. -Due to covid, the rate has slowed. It used to update 5 days a week, but now it's one new update every 3 or 4 days. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Domai offers a non-glamourous, basic softcore approach. Many years ago I was a member off and on. The catalog of models was the main attraction, combined with a low-priced membership. But since MetArt took over the site from the original founder (Eolake Stobblehouse), they've raised the membership price, and it's now as expensive or more expensive than most glamour-style photo sites. So in spite of the attractive models, I would hesitate to join the site. Unless you're tired of the glamour-style approach many photosites use, and want something more basic. Domain is a photo only site, no videos. So that could be a negative for some. Also, the site is extreme softcore only. No masturbation or explicit scenes. Site design is simple and basic. Which makes navigation easy. Back when the original founder was running the site, it used to have more features: short erotic fiction, articles on how to enjoy life and erotic photography, a loyalty program to make membership even cheaper. But that was all dropped after MetArt took over. Because some of the models are so lovely, and many of the rest are attractive, the site might be worth joining for a month or so. But there is too much competition, both softcore and hardcore, for this site to stand out. I'm giving the site a score of 85. Because I have fond memories of the site. But the price ($29.99/month) makes it expensive. 05-01-21  01:06pm Replies (0) Review 134 X Empire (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -X Empire is a small network of 5 sites. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all 5 sites. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -You can choose your login details (username and password). Making them easy to remember. -You get 2 confirming emails on sign-up. Stating your login details, and the terms of your membership. -Customer service is 24/7, by live chat, phone, and email. Live chat responds within a few minutes. -Navigation is easy. The sites are laid out clearly. You can sort by site, category (type of sex you want), model, or latest or highest rated video. -Content is exclusive. Cons: -X Empire is part of Gamma Entertainment, but they use a different biller, and support service from Adult Time. However, I assume the biller and support are first-rate, because it's part of Gamma Entertainment. The biller is olifehelp. -This is a minor con. You have to login through the site you joined through. You can't login through any of the other sites in the network, or login through the main network. -Membership can be streaming only, or streaming plus downloads. The streaming only membership is cheaper. Read what type of membership you are signing up for, which is not always made clear on the join page. I suggest using live chat to confirm whether you are getting downloads included. -The public pages give you almost no information about the network, or any of the sites. No sample videos, no model listing, nothing useful to determine whether the site is worth joining. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The Best Porn states there is a 300 GB daily limit for downloads. Bottom Line: Number of videos: around 1400. Number of photosets: around 2200. Number of photos per set: 140-200+ Newer videos can be streamed (and downloaded, if you have downloads) 360p through 4K. The 4K option was added a few years ago. You have 5 sites in the network. -All Black X features black performers. Mainly male black on female black, but there are a few where it's solo black, or female black on female black. -Dark X features a black guy on a white woman. But there are a few videos where you have 2 black men on a white woman. -Erotica X features a white guy on a white woman. Hard X features slightly more extreme sex. The largest site in the network, with 639 videos. Lesbian X is a lesbian site, mainly white models. The production values for the videos is good to excellent. The videos are crisp and clear images, good lighting, good colors. The models range from OK to very nice. But don't expect the models to compare to a glamcore site like the Vixen-Tushy sites, where the models are presented like movie stars. Even when you have the same models appearing at the X Empire and at the Vixen-Tushy sites, the models look so much better at Vixen-Tushy. Vixen-Tushy just makes videos with highest-quality production values (expensive sets, great lighting, expensive costumes, and a selection of models that ranges from lovely to fucking gorgeous). The network has a lot of black performers (male and female). And I like the Erotic X site, which uses a glamcore approach. Navigation is easy. There's advertising on every page, but that's standard for porn sites. Along with the pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. I'm giving X Empire a score of 85. It's a worthwhile join, especially if you catch a holiday discount. 04-29-21  07:27pm Replies (0) Review 135 Filth Flix (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Note: I want to explain that I am being easy in this review because I paid a low membership price. Some PU members think that membership price should either not be mentioned in a review, or else considered as a minor factor. I disagree. The membership price is a major factor for this site, because you are paying a low fee to access over 3000 hardcore videos, over 1100 models. The site is certainly not perfect, but the operators are working to improve the site, as well as giving you a wide range of hardcore niches. That slant colors this review. If you don't agree that price can be a major factor in the value of a site, then you should probably ignore the review. PROS(START OF): -The main pro is the low membership price. There is a PU discount for $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $14.95/month. I believe there are holiday discounts for even lower prices. -The network is like a tiny Adult Time network: you get access to 3015 hardcore videos and 1136 models. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -The videos come from over 70 different sites, so it's like a sampling of those sites. For a very low price, you should be able to find plenty of videos to watch. -Most or all of the video content is available in hd quality. -The site is easy to navigate, and you can search by site, category, tags, model name, video title, etc. They also list the sites offered, plus categories. -Members can leave comments on scenes. -You can have a favorites list, which is useful with over 3000 videos to search and choose from. -You can also make your own personal play list. -Epoch, Vendo and Segpay are the billers, which are first rate and dependable. -Can pay with a credit card, paypal, or crypto. -There is a model listing. -With over 70 sites contributing, the number of niches offered is large: teen, MILF, masturbation, handjobs, solo, twosomes, group sex, straight fucking, anal, fisting, lesbian, blow jobs, peeing, spy glasses, cuckolds, stocking fetish, dildos and other toys. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): -Good update rate. 22 videos added this week. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -A special way to improve your account security. You can choose to enable two-factor authentification. If enabled, you will be emailed a unique code each time you try to login to the site. The code will allow you to enter the members area. Seems like over-kill to me. CONS(START OF): -The main con is this network is streaming only. No downloads. -By default, it shows your user ID if you make a comment. The user ID is your email address. So create a nickname before your make any comments on the videos, or else you are exposing your email address. -Only some content is dated. So you can't tell what the update rate is. The public page often tells you how many new videos were added to the network in the current week. Also, I believe the dating process started recently, so most of the content is not dated. -Cancelling could be easier. You can submit a ticket asking to cancel. But I think it's easier to cancel through your biller. So save your confirmation emails. -The content is non-exclusive. If you're into porn, you've probably seen a lot of the content featured at this network. -Videos often don't list the names of the models in the video. -Many videos are in a foreign language, with no subtitles. But the dialogue is usually unimportant in this type of hardcore. -Videos often lack tags, a text description, or a trailer. Edit: Hit the "Show More" link to bring up the brief text description, tags, model name, etc. But many videos don't show the model name, even after hitting the "Show More" link. -Most videos have a choice of 480p and 1080p. Which is OK, but not great. -I tried joining through Vendo, but was rejected several times. Then I tried to join through Epoch, and was accepted the first try. Vendo had no pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. Epoch did have a pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Network stats Videos: 3012 Video runtime varies: from 20 minutes to about 1 hour. Models: 1136 Contributing sites: 70+ Photo sets: 295 Number of photos per set: 100+ -This is a streaming-only network. So there are two main ways to use it: 1. A low-cost intro to over 70 different sites, to see which sites you might want to join. 2. A low-cost source of hardcore videos, from a wide variety of niches, from a wide variety of sites (over 70 different sites have contributed content to this network). For a low price of $10 or less for the first month, this site is worth joining to see how many videos you want to watch. There are no downloads. But if you like what you find, and there's plenty of content from a wide variety of niches, a low-cost year's membership might make sense. Because there's no way you can sample over 3000 videos in a month or even a few months. I know that most PU members want downloading privileges to join a site. But some of the low prices I've seen for a year's membership make this a worthwhile join. rabbitsreviews lists a first year membership of $48, which seems cheap as dirt. (PU lists a first year membership of $60. So go with the rabbitsreviews discount.) Consider this site as a low-rent version of most hardcore porn sites, except that it's not the low-rent that many hardcore sites were around 2000 or earlier: the videos are mainly acceptable or OK, not the high gloss videos at the Wow sites, the X-Art site, the Blacked-Tushy-Vixen sites. It's a trade-off: you're paying a low price, and getting a lower-quality hardcore product, but not the cheap videos made around 2000 with cheap sets, cheap production values, poor lighting. The site has plenty of ads. You can ignore them, or you might find some of the ads have a low price that's worth considering. I'm giving the site a score 93. For a low price, you're getting access to some good content. But it depends on your willingness to scan through a lot of material that won't appeal to your individual tastes. Edit: I have downloaded videos from this site. The downloads were done through a shareware download manager, not from the site's function. My mistake. Reducing the site score to 90. I just started using the download manager, and didn't realize I was using the program to do downloads. Thought I was using the site software, until I realized the download link was popping up for other sites, as well at the Filth Flix site. 04-24-21  06:16pm Replies (0) Review 136 Lesbian X (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -The site is part of the X Empire network of 5 sites. So you get access to 5 sites with your membership. -The good-quality photosets have a zip file. -There are model indexes: one for the network, a different index for each individual site. -The model's page has links to her videos. -There is a cheaper streaming membership. Downloads require a more expensive membership. -Videos come with lots of tags describing the video. They have a text description of the video that's so brief it's worthless. For example, the complete text description for a Scarlit Scandal video is: "Scarlit Scandal loves her ass spanked while she's being fucked and Jax Slayher makes sure to turn Scarlit's cheeks red as he plunges his piece deep into her pussy." The tags do a much better job describing the video. -Members can add comments on the model's page. Useless, except for fans wanting to show their appreciation of the model. Cons: -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -No information for the models (except for a generic name). -Ads on member pages. Easy to ignore, because they are placed at the bottom of the page. -Most of the models at the site are White, but there are a few Black, Asian, and Latina models. Bottom Line: The site is based on real life events (I read that from a motion picture, but it adds meaning to the sex shown in these videos: think of your sister, your mother, your grandmother, exploding with lust when they are with the women of their dreams.) The site theme is lesbian sex. The sex featured at Lesbian X is young teens and MILFs, so you get a mix of young teens and attractive older women. The site has 140 videos. Videos have your choice of definition from 360p through 4K. The 4K option was added a few years back for the newer posted videos. Before that, the highest resolution was 1080p. You can stream the full video, or a trailer for video. There is an accompanying photoset for each video. Photosets range from 99 photos to over 400 photos. The soundtrack for many of the videos is an overpowering music beat. Either turn the volume down, or mute the volume and put on the song "I Want To Know What Love Is" by Foreigner, to heighten the mood. That song is a much better background than the canned music in these lesbian videos. The videos are standard lesbian videos: lots of kissing, licking, sucking, stroking, some use of toys. The models are surprisingly clean: not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of models with over-large breast implants. The sets and costumes are nice. I thought the lesbian videos were pretty much plain vanilla: although the models are making lots of noises to show excitement, the videos lack real heat. I've seen some videos at Teen Fidelity, Rocco Siffredi or other sites that had real heat. That I thought were arousing. Lesbian X is a different approach where the performers are acting more naturally. However, when I say they are acting more naturally, what I mean is that these models are role-playing for cash, there's little or no real passion. In spite of the moans and groans and squirting. I'm giving the site a score of 78. The site doesn't impress me much. Although the models are clean and attractive, the models at other sites can be more attractive. The update rate is slow and irregular: There have been 9 new videos in the last 12 months. The content is exclusive. Navigation is easy. But there's little that's exciting to watch at this site. 04-22-21  10:53am Replies (0) Review 137 Dark X (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the X Empire network. You get access to 5 sites with your membership. All Black X, Dark X, Erotica X, Hard X, Lesbian X. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -You can choose your login details, so easily remembered username and password. -The site and network is easy to navigate. -The extra-large thumbnails illustrating the videos at the site are clear and crisp, giving you a fine idea of what the model and the stunt cock look like. -The large thumbnails are actually gifs: hold your mouse over a thumbnail, and you get a very brief action-view of the model, watch her breasts flop around, her ass jiggle as she gets pounded by a black cock. The downside is I'm into young teens with slender bodies, and the models here are mainly 20-30 year old models with normal-sized bodies that look more like porn stars instead of attractive young girls. Fans of the site call the models beautiful, but this is not my idea of beauty. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Even models that I think are pretty are presented as sluts at this site. -Note: I am referring to the models at the Dark X site. The models at the other network sites are presented as attractive young women. -All content is exclusive. -Live chat is fast to respond, less than 2 minutes wait time. -All videos stream and download from 288p through 1080p. The newest videos have a 4K option. CONS(START OF): -Sometimes have to pass through an ad-filled page to get to the members area. -Every members page has ads, but ads are easily ignored. -I'm being picky, but I think the prices for the sites in the ads are too high. -The Best Porn states there is a daily download limit of 300GB. Which seems like a minor con to me. Who downloads 300GB in a day? -The major con for me is I don't appreciate the style or approach of the videos. I enjoy the videos at the Wow network, Teen Mega World, X-Art. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): But at this site, the idea is you're looking at young women who want to fuck with a Black man, because it's somehow forbidden (even though it's perfectly legal today for whites and blacks to have sex). Sucking a black dick. Having a black cock up a white girl's ass. I don't buy this fantasy. -Irregular update rate. Anywhere from 1 to 5 new videos per month. -You can easily request a copy of your live chat. Except I did request a copy, the site stated a chat copy was sent to my email address, and I never got it (I checked inbox and spam box and never got a copy). BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Site has 244 videos. -Video runtime is 20 to 40 minutes. -Videos can be streamed or downloaded in the following definitions: 360p through 4K. Note: I joined for $5 for 30 days, so I didn't have downloading privileges. Even when my membership renewed at $19.95/month, I didn't have download privileges. That would cost about $10/month more. I do have unlimited streaming. -Site features inter-racial porn, where black men fuck white women. I'm over 70, so I can recall where, mainly in the Southern United States, racial segregation was practiced: separate drinking fountains for white and black, blacks not allowed to use white-only restrooms, or to eat inside white-only restaurants. I grew up in California, in Los Angeles county, so segregation was not so obviously practiced. But I remember we only had 1 black kid in our high school. No laws preventing him from using any facility a white person would use, but you might argue that 1 black kid in a public school population of around 300 was practical segregation. Black men having sex with white women is a popular niche. I guess it's based on the old taboo prohibiting black men from having sex with white women. So it can be shocking or add an element of lust for interracial sex. (I don't know why we don't have lots of sites where white men fuck Asian women, since there was a lot of racial discrimination against Asians.) I was roommates with a Chinese guy in the 1970s. I was roommates with a Black guy in the 1970s. Both of them had sex with white women. It was nothing explosive or scandalous. It was just normal sex. So I don't buy into the fantasy that a white woman having sex with a black man is evil. Blacked.com and blackedraw.com are more my style, because they take attractive young women, make them even more attractive, and pair them with one or more black guys. But the tone is very different from the Dark X site. Porn is fantasy. A lot of times, you need to shut down your brain to enjoy the show. Except that I want good-looking teens, not porn stars looking like sluts. I have nothing against black stunt cocks. But it just seems stupid to me that a white woman touching a black man's cock is ready to explode with lust. Which is the fantasy that the Dark X site is promoting. I'm giving the Dark X site a score of 78. Blacked has the following advantages over Dark X: The production values are much higher. The models are presented much more attractively. The update rate is much faster. Blacked is a high-class act. Dark X falls short. I would definitely choose Blacked over Dark X. 04-20-21  04:38pm Replies (0) Review 138 18 Videoz (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Low membership price: With a PU discount, first month is $14.95, recurs at $29.95/month. But PU has a discounted price of $59.95/year (recurring). -3,100+ scenes for the network. -The network has current updates (around 2 new videos per week). -The billing processors are Segpay, Epoch and Vendo, all trusted names. -Network provides access to 17 sites. -Free lifetime access for ex-members. Ex-members still get limited access to network content. -They recently updated the login to a secure page (https). But the member pages are still not secure. -Most content is exclusive. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. Cons: -Although login is now secure, the member pages are not secure. -The homepage and video listing is out-dated. The thumbnails are small, need to be brighter and more attractive, to make the content more appealing. This is basic marketing: the videos themselves can be poor to very good, but they deserve a more appealing presentation. -Member pages have ads on every page. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: This is a teen-orientated network. Almost all the models are late teens, early 20s. Many of them are cute or attractive. You will find many of the same models at other teen networks like Teen Mega World, Wow network, even some at the Metart network. There are 17 sites in the network. So the sites cover a wide range of teen niches. Most of the sites are archives that haven't updated in years. The newer vidoes have a 4K definition download option. Videos from about 4 years old and older mainly have a 720p or 1080p download option. The videos from Jun 2009 have a resolution of 320x240p through 720x576p. The streaming for the videos prior to that date is limited to 240p or 480p. A lot of the oldest videos are not worth watching or collecting. The problems are poor lighting, poor focus and cheap sets. The lighting is so dim in some early videos it's difficult to see what the model looks like. The older photosets are also not worth collecting. They are screencaps, with poor lighting, poor focus, cheap sets, cheap costumes (the costumes are cheap street clothes that look like they were bought at a rummage sale). The earliest videos are even worse than the earliest videos at Teen Mega World, which also started out as a low-rent teen hardcore network, but even when Teen Mega World was starting out, with low-rent clothes, low rent settings, they still did a better job with their videos and photosets than the 18videoz network. And as time went on, the Teen Mega World network spent their profits on better lighting, better equipment, to make the videos and photosets have higher production values, so that today, the Teen Mega World videos and photosets are good to excellent, and are just a few steps below the Wow network videos and photosets. Teen Mega World is one of my favorite hardcore teen networks, just below the Wow network. The models at Wow network are among the finest looking teens on the internet, and the production values, the clear crisp videos and photosets are borderline glamour in quality and style. For teen hardcore porn, Teen Mega World and the Wow network are my two favorite networks. I'm giving the 18Videoz network a score of 82. Negatives are that most of the sites stopped updating years ago. The network only updates with 1 new video every 3 or 4 days. The videos and photosets have improved over time. But there's too much old content that is ultra-low quality. The low membership price is one of the strengths of the network. But I prefer Teen Mega World network and the Wow network over the 18Videoz network. Bottom line: The 18Videoz network should deserve a higher score. There are some really cute models at the network. And there are some worthwhile videos to see. But there's too much trash that buries the good videos, so it's really hit or miss if you want to find the better quality videos at the network. I've listed the 17 sites you get access to in the 18Videoz network in the first reply to this review: 04-19-21  06:07am Replies (1) Review 139 Jay's POV (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Adult Time network. -Site has 138 videos. -The selection of models is first-rate: cute young teens and 20-year-old models. -Login and member pages are secure(https). -Customer support is first rate: 24/7 live chat, telephone, email. -Videos are available for streaming and download in your choice of definition: 288p through 2160p. -Members are allowed to comment, favorite videos, models, photosets. They leave negative comments on the site, unlike some sites that remove negative comments. -There is a brief text description of the video, and the tags do a good job describing the action. Cons: -Navigation is the main con. There's so much content at the network (over 50,000 videos and almost as many photosets), that it's difficult to find the content that appeals to you. That's good and bad: good, that you can find a lot of good to excellent hardcore videos; bad, because there will be a lot of content that doesn't fit your tastes. -I wish there was a model listing for each individual channel, instead of a network model listing. You have over 13,500 models at the network. So the model listing is not helpful finding what models are included in a particular channel. I mean, you click on a model's thumbnail, it will show you what sites she appears in. But I want a simple listing of the models that appear at each channel. Bottom Line: -Jay is the role model of the father I always wanted to be: He cares about his step-daughters. When he catches them taking nude selfies on their phones, he tells them how concerned he is about their welfare. What if some pervert posts the pictures on the internet? The innocent girls' lives would be ruined. Also, even though he admits he's not their real father, he says he has to know whether they are taking birth control pills: after all, you don't want a bunch of naked bastards running through the house without proper supervision. Jay is a man I can really admire. Also, Jay turns out to be a man with a sex drive. He can often be found on his bed wanking off to the pictures of his naked step-daughters. They are step-daughters, so it's not real incest. In some states, a step-father may not legally have sex with his step-daughter, even if the sex was consensual. It's still called incest. But in Jays POV, he believes that a little romance between a step-father and a step-daughter can bring them closer together. Jay is a man who appreciates that step-daughters are often younger than the women he's married, so that adds freshness and spice to the sex. Jay has a say in his household. He's not trying to take the place of their real dad, but he needs to be involved in the lives of his step-daughters. So if a step-daughter has any questions on sex, how to give a blow job, or whether anal sex is better than vaginal sex, Jay is the man to ask. Jay is also willing to demonstrate his experience with his step-daughters, especially if they are young and cute and attractive. Some of his step-daughters are unsure about Jay's rules, but Jay is such a smooth talker, that he soon convinces even the most uncertain girls that he is the man in charge. Jay has practical advice for his girls: don't go by the videos you see on the internet. They often give erroneous ideas about sex. Sex should be between two warm, loving partners. Jay is a warm, loving partner. Guys like Jay like their sex slow. Slow to start, then he can start pounding away as soon as the girl is warmed up. Since Jay is married to their mothers, the sex between Jay and the girls is a secret because Jay doesn't want any problems with the women he married. In conclusion, Jays POV is a teaching aid for people who want to marry women with step-daughters. First, make sure it's legal to have sex with your step-daughter in the state you're living in. Second, make sure you pick a woman with an attractive daughter. There's no sense fucking an unattractive step-daughter. Third, tell the girl you're doing it for her own good. You want to teach her the joys of sex. Much better than an inexperienced teen boy who doesn't know how to handle a young woman. Be firm, be autoritative. The step-daughter will learn valuable life lessons, while you get the benefit of teaching a young pussy how to fuck. A classic win-win for everyone. And if the mother does find out, tell her you did it for the daughter's sake. Jays POV is an excellent site. It gives you valuable life lessons on how to treat your stepdaughters. The videos are clear and crisp, and the step-daughter models are young and attractive. And once Jay gets into bed with them, due to Jay's coaching, they are soon able to give expert blowjobs. And to fuck like bitches in heat. Be like Jay, and make sure when selecting a wife, that the stepdaughter is young, cute, and will fill your afternoons with sinful sex. I'm giving the site a score of 85. That's due to Jay being the pervert I always wanted to be, and for filming his experiences in such clear, crisp videos with these lovely young pussies. 04-08-21  01:46am Replies (0) Review 140 All Black X (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Site features black models and black men. A special niche, because most sites featuring blacks are white models with black men. -PU has discounted prices to the All Black X site: $14.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/mo. $95.40/year. Note: if you use the PU link to go to the X Empire network, the yearly membership option is $89.95/year. -Login and member pages are secure(https). -Site loads easily. -Very large thumbnails for video listing of contents, which are really gifs that show you a tiny preview of the action. The Gifs are impressive: large, well-lit images that clearly show you the male and female performers in action. -Small site (only 37 videos), so the navigation is easy. -Photosets: can hold anywhere from 100 to 500 photos. The photos have good focus, good lighting, nice sets, good colors. They are worth collecting. -I don't have downloading privileges for the videos (I joined on a $5 special for the first month). Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): But I do have downloading privileges for the photosets, and unlimited streaming for the videos. -I have access to all 5 sites in the network. -Support is live chat and email. No telephone support that I could find. -Login and member pages are secure(https). -You can choose your login details (username and password), so it's easy to remember. -The network models are attractive, and some of them have appeared at other sites, even at Metart sites. CONS(START OF): -The site (and network) has a slow, irregular update rate. The site has 1 update per month. The network averages 2 updates per week. -The Best Porn states there is a daily download limit of 200GB. That is a minor con, because 200GB is a large amount of data. -Photos download with a generic file number. You have to manually rename the zip file with the model's name, site name, date posted, title of the set. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Only 1 definition zip file for each photoset. -Although I have access to all 5 sites in the network, I have to login through the site I joined at: entering my login details at other sites in the network gives me an error message. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Membership in the X Empire network gives you access to 5 sites. All Black X Dark X Erotica X Hard X Lesbian X The All Black X site stats: Video definition: 288p through 2160p. Number of videos: 37 Number of models: 33 An individual photoset can hold anywhere from 74 to 500+ photos. Individual photo details: 1280 x 1920 pixels. Individual photo resolution: 96 x 96 dpi. The photos are good quality: real photos, not screencaps. Almost all of the videos are a black man and a black woman having sex. There are 2 videos of a woman with 2 men. There is one video of 2 women with one man. There is one lesbian video of 2 women. There are tags to describe the action, and a very short text description of the slender plot. The plot usually goes like this: a female and male met and fuck. Very little setup. Although they divide the content into 5 sites, the videos themselves don't carry a logo showing what site they belong to. Nor does the short text description tell you what site the video belongs to. The site shows you how a female prepares to meet a strange male: First she fluffs her hair with her hands, scrubs her teeth with a finger, exposes her breasts so she can tweek her nipples and breasts, covers her breasts back up, and then goes to meet the man. I plan to install a hidden camera the next time I meet up with a gorgeous woman, to see if this happens in real life. The site and network is good to excellent. Network is part of Gamma Entertainment, which owns Adult Time network, but this network (and site) are completely separate from the Adult Time network. It even uses a different billing and support team from Adult Time. I don't know why, because I think the Adult Time billing and support team are excellent. This is a personal issue: if I didn't have too many porn memberships already, I would spend more time at this site and network. The photosets and videos are excellent. The style is reality porn, where they have a plot to set up the sex action. The models are attractive, the sets are nice. Not super-glamourous, but very nice locations. The videos are clear and crisp, well videotaped, good lighting, good sound control. The background music is good, not loud or jarring. This is a small site that probably started about a year ago. You only have 37 videos so far. Current update rate is 1 video per month. Maybe the site will grow faster once the covid epidemic has gone. This is a personal issue, but I have too many porn memberships at this time. I don't have enough time to spend at this network. The network offers high-quality videos and photosets, with some very attractive models. But there are too many other fine-to-great networks that compete with this network. I'm giving the site (and network) a score of 88. If I was new to porn, I could grade it higher. Maybe I'm jaded, I like the site and network, but there's too much competition from other sites for me to spend much money or time at this network. 03-28-21  11:07pm Replies (0) Review 141 Nubiles Porn (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -The network is mainly teen-oriented content (which you should figure from the name: a nubile is a sexually attractive young woman). Although you do get a smattering of MILFs to guide the teens into discovering the joys of sex). -You get around 17 sites in the network, covering different niches. Stepfamily incest, blowjobs, vaginal and anal sex, bad teens punished, role playing where the young teens seduce or get seduced by step-brothers, step-fathers, step-mothers. -Most of the videos and photosets from the last several years feature crysal clear videos and photosets. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Content is exclusive. Cons: -Nubiles Porn network has content going back to at least 2004. So the definition of the older material is lower than more recent content. For example, videos from 2004 are 270p or 360p, which is below the standards that most PU members want. But if that's all that is available for the older content of these teen starlets, be thankful that it's still available. Many sites delete their older content from years ago, which means that content has gone to internet hell. -Many of the sites at Nubiles Porn stopped updating years ago. So there's no fresh content at these sites. Which is a shame, because there are new models coming out every year, and all you get at these archive sites is old content. And the site themes of some of these sites were fresh and interesting. -The site (and network) is teen orientated. There are a few older models (MILFs), but the majority of the models are teens or early twenties. Mainly white, slender girls. Many PU members want a mix of ages, races, body types. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): This network is basically slender white teens. Not a con for me, but PU members often comment they want a mix of model types. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. You have to un-check the cross-sale, or make sure to cancel the cross-sale before it turns into an expensive membership. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Nubiles Porn is one of the finest porn networks on the internet. There are several factors that make it a wonderful network: -1. The mix of attractive teen models, many of them just starting their porn career. Edit: many teen models last for 1 or 2 years, but some models can last for 10 years or more. I'm guessing that the models that focus on glamour usually last longer. There are some hardcore models that do both glamour and hardcore that have been around for 10 or more years, that have built up a strong fan-base. But those are the minority. -2.Navigation is easy. The sites are laid out logically, making it easy to find and load/download the content you want. -3. Good search engine. The search returns results from the site you are logged into, not the network as a whole. That is good and bad: good, because it forces you to be aware which site you are logged into. Bad, because you have to navigate to each site to see the model's content at the network, which makes for extra work. -4. The photosets and videos are old-school simple: Not glamor style, but not cheap porn. The sets are ok, the youth of the models (this is a teen-oriented network) and their natural good-looks are presented simply. -5. The nubiles.net site is the crown jewel of the network. It's like an encyclopedia of porn teen starlets early in their career, with over 2,400 models. -6. The Best Porn review, and comments by some PU members, state that Nubiles.net is not included in a Nubiles Porn membership. This is wrong. Nubiles.net is included in every Nubiles Porn membership. And vice versa. A Nubiles.net membership gives you access to the Nubiles Porn network. The problem is that Nubiles Porn does not prominently display the Nubiles.net site. You have to use the drop-down menu which lists your membership sites to see (and login) to the Nubiles.net site. Alternatively, you can use your Nubiles Porn login details to login directly to the Nubiles.net site. -PU gives you a discounted membership to Nubiles Porn. $19.94/month recurring, instead of $29.32/month. Or $99.95/year instead of $199/year. I got a membership for $84/year. Holiday discounts are offered throughout the year. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -I'm looking at a video at the Nubiles.net site, titled "Hardcore", posted Jan 22, 2008. The model is Kadence, a cute 18-year-old blonde model, and the stunt cock is probably Timo Hardy (aka Alexander Sorel, Sergio, Timur Hardy, Timur, Timothy, Paul, George Vaugn). He used to be one of the main stunt cocks at Teen Mega World network and at a bunch of other porn sites, along with his brother (or cousin?), Oliver Strelly (who was also a major stunt cock with over 900 scenes). In the video, Timo has short brown hair. Most of the time I've seen him he had a shaved head, and he appeared in well over 800 porn videos for many different porn sites from around 2006 through 2014. The reason I mention him is because I used to be irritated he was in so many porn videos. I thought he was brutal to the teen girls he fucked. It wasn't over-the-top brutality featured on some extreme sites, just slightly rough sex where he slapped the girl's face and ass, twisted the girl's arms, and rammed her pussy and ass and mouth. But the models seemed to enjoy it. It's been years since I've seen him in any videos, but in the 2008 video, he seemed so young, it brought back memories of how much I disliked him for his rough treatment of the models. But after viewing porn for years, and seeing some of the rough sex that is now being featured at some porn sites, I realize I was mistaken: maybe the girls really did enjoy his rough treatment of them. Or maybe they only smiled because they were told to smile. I thought Timo was a thug. But I did respect that he had the vigor and endurance to give these girls strong orgasms. He was like a fucking sex machine. I've said the Nubiles Porn network is an excellent network. You get your money's worth. Make sure you visit the Nubiles.net site, which is included, to browse through the lovely models. The individual sites in Nubiles Porn network cover a variety of niches: fake incest (sex between members of a blended family), lesbian, petite teen girls, punishment of bad teen girls, role play where ballerinas get fucked, role play where teens and teachers fuck, role play where stunt cocks hunt down runaway teens, etc. A lot of the plots are flimsy, and the acting skills of most of the models are poor. Most of the models are very attractive, so shut down your brain and try to enjoy the naked flesh on view. CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW: 03-28-21  06:51am Replies (1) Review 142 The White Boxxx (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: Note: although I think this site in one of the finest glamcore sites in the internet, the network has been hard hit by the covid epidemic. The network update rate has been slowed to around 10 new scenes per month. You're wasting your money if you buy a membership longer than 1 or 2 months here. PROS(START OF): -The main pro is this is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. -Site has 320 scenes. They are refreshing the site with new content. -The content is exclusive. Aside from tube sites (and torrent sites), which seem to copy almost all porn sites, I've never seen any scenes from this site. I don't use torrent sites, but I do look at PornHub to see new models and find sites I might want to join. -The selection of models is among the finest of the internet. They also appear at the Wow network, Metart network, X-Art and other fine sites, but when appearing at The White Boxxx, their scenes are like glamorous, erotic movies. A short list of some of the models featured: Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Cherry Kiss, Jia Lissa, Lena Reif, Lika Star, Liya Silver, Lya Missy, Oxana Chic, Sabrisse, the list of attractive models goes on and on. And the site presents them as lovely as any movie star. -You can sort the movie listing by newest movies, most popular, most viewed, runtime. -Movies have a trailer, and a short text description, as well as tags. -You can stream and/or download videos in your choice of 240p through 1080p. -There is no download limit for photosets. But the photosets are tiny, 10-14 photos per set. -PU has a discounted price of $14.95/month. Or a yearly price of $130. But I paid $80/year. Maybe I got a holiday discount? -There is a link on each video to skip the intro section, which is useful, after you've wasted time watching the same intro again and again. -You can switch the language the site/network displays. Site can display in Deutsch, English, Espanol, Francais, Italiano, and more. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): This is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. I say the cons are basically minor, because I'm so impressed with how lovely these models are. If the models weren't so fucking gorgeous, the cons would irritate me more. -Irregular update rate. You get one new update per week, approximately. Many sites have taken to reposting older content shot years ago, but this site is still putting out new content. -You have a download limit of 100 videos per month. This is your limit for the entire network, not just for a single site in the network. Which means, you will probably need to stay a member for at least two months, to get all the videos you want to collect. -The photosets are limited to around 10 to 14 photos per set. That is a damn shame, since many of these models are absolutely gorgeous, or at least presented at their finest, and these models deserve a full set of at least 100+ photos per set. -There is a splash page of ads, and ads on every member page. -I wish there was a model listing for each site. Instead, you have a model text listing for the entire network. And it's cumbersome to click through the pages of the thumbnail listing of the scenes, looking for the models/scenes you want to view. -No 4K scenes. Which is surprising for a glamour site. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Why do I call this the finest glamcore site on the internet? They make it an art form to present attractive models in the best light possible. They start with girls who are naturally attractive, then use makeup, wonderful lighting, expensive sets to showcase how lovely these models can be. The girls are doing hardcore porn, so you would normally expect a gritty aspect to the scenes: but not here. It's like these girls are beautiful angels who came down to earth to show men (and sometimes other women) the heavenly delights of sex: heaven is not a sterile place where everyone spends their time singing the praises of the Lord, but a place where, if you are lucky enough to go up instead of down, you can taste the pleasures of heavenly sex. And that's why they are singing: to proclaim the incredible joy of fucking these women. But if you're gay, there's probably a section in heaven for gay men. And for all the other varieties of gender that are clamoring to be heard. The first video I saw at The White Boxxx was a video of Lena Reif. Let me quote from a review I did on 07-18-19: "Watching Lena Reif's breasts sway as she moves is watching poetry in motion, in the video titled "Her First Threesome", where Lena Reif and Shona River give stunt cock Lutro a ride to remember. That was the first video I watched at the site, and that video alone, is worth the membership price to the network." I stand by that statement. That one video, by itself, is worth the membership price to the network. I've seen other videos of Lena Reif, at other sites. She's been featured at the Wow network, Metart network, Adult Time, Vixen network, etc. But at The White Boxxx, in this video, she's like an angel come to earth. Absolutely gorgeous. It's like the difference between file mignon and low-grade hamburger. She might be attractive at other sites, in other photosets or videos, but in this one video, she is fucking gorgeous. Bottom line summary: The main draw of the site is the care they take to present the attractive models as gorgeously as possible. I mean these are hardcore scenes, and yet the models are fucking lovely. The sex is mainly slow and sensual, but the scene lighting, the sets, the makeup, the expert camera-work that focuses on the lovely bodies of these models, just add up to one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet. I'm not saying the site is perfect. One PU member complained that he was having internet connection problems, couldn't download videos. And he reported that site support was slow to correct the problem. I've used site support, and had no problem reaching them through email. Email is slower than telephone or live chat, but that's all there is for support. I've only used support a couple of times. I had to wait a few days for a response, but any problems I had were resolved. But if I had a slow internet connection, and couldn't stream or download what I wanted, that would be a deal breaker and I would cancel my sub. But, thankfully, I've never had a real problem at the network that wasn't resolved fairly soon. So I'm giving the site (with network access) a score of 90. The girls are presented as gorgeous creatures. The sex is slow and sensual. I've seen a few scenes at other sites where the sex could be hotter: Pure Taboo, Teen Fidelity, Rocco Siffredi. But for glamcore sites, where the models are presented as gorgeous creatures, The White Boxxx is the finest site I've seen. If they increased the update rate for the network, once the covid epidemic is past, I would increase the score. 03-24-21  11:41pm Replies (0) Review 143 Viv Thomas (0) 91.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Good update rate: they add a new photoset or video every day or every other day. -Video and photoset quality is outstanding. -The selection of models is very good. I would rate the Metart, MetartX, Love Hairy (all part of the Metart network) as more attractive, but I doubt any PU member would kick any of these girls out of his or her bed. -In the last few years, the site has focused on two girls getting it on, or solo masturbation. The girls (late teens, twenties) are attractive, but I would rate Love Hairy and MetartX models slightly above the VivThomas models. Let me explain: how a model is photographed can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears. Also, you have more control over a model's appearance in a photograph than in a video, more control over the lighting, use of cosmetics, photoshopping, etc. And in my opinion, even if the same model appears at all 3 sites, her appearance at Love Hairy and MetartX is usually better than her appearance at Viv Thomas. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder: but the photographer can make a huge difference in a model's appearance: with lighting, setting, cosmetics, photoshopping, etc. One of the finest sites for making a model appear glamourous is The White Boxxx, which makes an art of making attractive models appear like movie stars, even when they are doing hardcore sex. -Content is exclusive. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. CONS(START OF): -Viv Thomas is an excellent site. The cons are minor. Navigation is easy. The content (films and galleries) have extensive tags that make finding the content that appeals to your tastes easy. The model index is good: oversized headshots of the models. But even though these are attractive to beautiful women, the headshots often don't emphasize their beauty. The staff, or whoever is responsible to making these headshots, need to re-photograph the model's headshots to show how lovely they can be. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): They need to sell the beauty of the models. Appearance or presentation is vitally important in a glamour site. -Viv Thomas is a stand-alone site. It's part of the Metart network, but membership in Viv Thomas does not give you access to any other site in the Metart network. -You do get access to the Metart live cam shows, but that that's standard with any Metart network site. And they really push the live cam shows, with ads on every member page. -Like many or most Metart network sites, you can buy individual photosets and videos, even if you're not a member. But the prices are not cheap. A better way to download the photosets and videos is to join for a month: much cheaper, especially if you want to download more than a few sets. -They advertise daily updates. But the update rate is really every 1 or 2 days. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site stats: Number of films: 2,123 Number of galleries: 3,322 Number of models: 1,095 Number of contributing photographers: 36 Most of the models are attractive, and many are familiar from other sites in the Metart network. -Viv Thomas was started by Viv Thomas around 2000, so it been around over 20 years now. The Metart people took over the site in 2014. Domai, which started around 1997, used a simpler style of female solo nudity. And then Goddess Nudes was started by the same founder of DOMAI a few years later, to create a slightly edgier site. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were added to the Metart network when the founder's age made running the sites increasingly difficult. All 3 sites were famous for the quality of the content. Although the Viv Thomas site was much more sexual, with solo, lesbian, and boy-girl content. DOMAI and Goddess Nudes were mainly simple solo female model sets. Once Metart took over the sites, they slowly changed the site structures into the Metart network style, to make navigation easier and to add the frills that the Metart network sites are known for. Photosets are available for streaming and downloading in 3 definitions. You can control how the photosets are displayed on your monitor: resolution, number of thumbnails displayed per page, slideshow interval time, whether comments are displayed or hidden, sort order for films and galleries, etc. You also get the standard blog for the Metart network, tailored to the Viv Thomas site. Large, well-photographed photos of one or two lovely models, with a link to a short erotic fiction based on the gallery or film displayed. Viv Thomas is basically a fine site: easy to use, good customer support (but telephone and live chat service would be faster than email support), good erotic content for solo masturbation and two-girl lesbian sex. I'm giving the site a score of 91. It's an excellent site, and PU has a discounted membership price of $20/month. Or $100/year, if you're into lesbian sex. 03-23-21  05:34pm Replies (0) Review 144 Met Art X (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Metart network. Excellent layout, easy navigation, all the bells and whistles of a first-rate glamour site. -The quality of the models is the gold or platinum standard: lovely young women in their late teens or twenties. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Daily updates. -Photosets go up to 720p, 1080p, 4K. -Customer support is 24/7 by email. (No phone or live chat support.) -Login and member pages are secure (https). -There is a blog, where you have a small photo (or very large-sized thumbnail) of different models, with a link to an erotic short story. The photos are clear, crisp images of these lovely young models, with a bit of erotic fiction to get you off. -There are trailers for the videos, to give you a preview of the video. -But the photosets and videos also have extensive tags, to describe them, that you can use for searching for content that interests you. -No DRM. But most sites have stopped using DRM many years ago. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -If you're not a site member, you can buy individual photosets and videos. But that is expensive, and a one-month membership would be a cheaper option. -PU discount to the site membership, $20/month, or $100/yearly. But sometimes you can find a holiday special for a lower price. CONS(START OF): -The cons are basically minor. This is a first-rate glamour site that showcases lovely young women masturbating. The women are are absolutely lovely. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Some PU members complain that almost all the models are slender, white, teen-or-early twenty models. They want more diversity in age, body type, race, whatever. -The site favors girls with natural attributes. Some PU members (some people will always complain, no matter what happens) want girls with tattoos, implants, piercings, harder edge to the sex, for variety. Note: if a girl does have tattoos, the site usually erases them with photoshop in the photosets. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -No bonus sites included. You get the Metartx site, and access to the live chat shows, which is standard for any Metart network site. But I'm not into live chat shows, too afraid I will get hooked and start spending serious money on these shows. -The model index lists a few stats for the model, but almost no bio data: The stats given include: eye color, hair color, height, weight, breast size, pubic hair style(shaved, trimmed, natural), ethnicity. -The canned music at the start of the videos is annoying. Better if they deleted the music track. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site theme: beautiful girls masturbating. You can think of this site as Metart (which is mainly softcore) with orgasm. Metart is mainly solo girl content, although there are sets with two or more girls. But it's strictly softcore. Metartx is mainly solo girls masturbating. Some sets and videos have 2 girls. Masturbation could be considered mid-core or hardcore, depending on who you talk to. Site stats: Videos: 1,019 Video runtime: 10-20 minutes Photosets: 830 Models: 306 Photographers: 40 The main draw to the site is how fucking lovely the models are. And that the girls are masturbating, instead of the softcore solo action of nude modelling at Metart. This site is what Playboy should have developed. Instead, Playboy magazine stopped their print magazine, and Playboy today is mainly a brand name that is remembered for its past glory from the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s. I'm a sucker for lovely young women. And if they put on a show while mastubating, that only makes it better. Over time, since there is little or no plot, the sex can lose its impact. But the girls are so lovely, the photography and videos shot with high quality film, nice settings: the girls are not just lovely, but adorable . You get beautiful girls naked. The action is not rough or over-the-top, but sensual. You could say it's couple-friendly, but solo friendly, as well. Although the perfect solution would be for Metart X to send samples of these models to your home to see if they really match the fantasies they create in your mind. Basically, as I already stated, Metart X focuses on solo girls masturbating. So it's a more erotic, more sensual site than Metart, with many of the same fine models. Many of the bells and whistles of a top-tier glamor site. A one-month membership is definitely worth your while at $20, or a cheaper membership if you can catch one on a holiday discount. I'm giving the site a score of 90, because the girls are so lovely, the quality of the videos and photosets is outstanding, and the site is easy to use. 03-23-21  11:17am Replies (0) Review 145 Love Hairy (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Love Hairy is part of the Metart network. So you can expect the fine technical features of the Metart sites: Logical site structure, with easy navigation. -Photosets have 3 main definitions: small, medium, large, with a zip file for each definition. -The membership is inexpensive: $7.99/month, or $60/year. I don't know if this is a PU discounted price, or the regular price. -The model listing can be sorted by alphabet or ratings (ratings by the members). The model listing is oversized thumbnails that give you a very good look at the model's face. -Support is 24/7. This is email support. I don't believe Love Hairy support has live chat or a phone service. -Excellent search engine. -Lots of tags to explain/support the content(photosets and videos). Can use them to search for items of interest. But I prefer to use the model index, myself. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -Nice photo player for streaming photosets. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Metart support watches the PU site, and often responds to reviews and comments about the Metart network with helpful suggestions and information. CONS(START OF): -Site content is not exclusive. All or most of the content has previously been posted at other sites in the Metart network. -There are 172 videos, but the overwhelming amount of content is photos. You have 1,253 photosets. So the site is more for photo lovers than video lovers. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -They advertise daily updates, but the real update rate is very irregular. Probably because of the covid epidemic. Bottom Line: The site is a depository of models who have pubic hair. The modern trend is for models to have no hair on their pubic area. Except that some people prefer the older style where women did not shave their pussies clean. Call it a fetish to prefer women with pubic hair. Or call it the natural look. Except even when it was normal for softcore porn to have women with pubic hair, the pubic hair was normally groomed or manicured. A few models might have armpit hair, or hair on their legs, but those would be a definite minority. The site focuses on women with pubic hair. Most men seem to prefer the clean-shaven pubic area on women, from the comments I've read at the Metart sites I visit. Unless a women has a forest growing down between her legs, I think pubic hair can look attractive. And the models at Love Hairy are definitely worth viewing. They are among some of the most beautiful women in the world. The Metart sites have, for over 20 years, been showcasing attractive teens and slightly older women. The Love Hairy is more focused on photosets than videos, but you get both. 1,253 photosets. 172 videos. 490 models. 151 contributing photographers. With a large number of photographers, you get to sample their different styles, although the basic approach is glamour photography. If you're familiar with Metart.com, the main site in the Metart network, you will have seen most of the models at Love Hairy. The models at Love Hairy range from attractive to gorgeous. You have hundreds of the loveliest women in the world featured here. Go to the public pages of Love Hairy, and page through the model listing, and I believe you will agree with me. The thumbnails are mostly headshots, but many of these women could have been finalists in any major beauty contest in the world. They are that attractive. This is psychological. And maybe it only applies to me. But the main Metart site, Metart.com, is too big. It has too much content. I get bored looking through their model listing, in spite of the lovely models. The physical beauty of the models loses its impact. Although Love Hairy has fewer models (490 models at Love Hairy, versus 3,821 at Metart), and most of the models at Love Hairy also appear at MetArt, I can appreciate the models at Love Hairy more easily. This is complicated. Partially, it's because the brain gets overloaded with the huge amount of Metart content: too much of a good thing, and your appreciation starts to dwindle. Partially, it's because I had a couple of bad experiences at Metart. I used to love the Metart site, even paid for a lifetime membership. But then I made a couple of comments at the site, and got flammed. This is foolish on my part, but I no longer love the site. I thought the Metart membership was supposed to support each other, but it turns out the Metart membership is composed of regular humans, who can be real dickheads at times. I'm being foolish, and I'm aware of it, but I no longer respect the Metart membership. I visit the site, since I paid for it, but I no longer look at the site with rose-colored glasses. Metart is a fine site with a lot of great models and great photography, but I no longer love the site. And I'm reluctant to support any Metart sites with a paid subscription. End of story. Bottom line: Love Hairy is a fine site. You have hundreds of lovely young women. You have some of the best glamour photographers contributing their work. You have a low membership price: both monthly, and yearly. I don't think many PU members would go for a yearly membership, because of the slow update rate. WeAreHairy is a competing site in the hairy niche. It's far more expensive than Love Hairy, and the models are less attractive. But it updates faster, the videos and photosets are exclusive, and PU members seem to prefer it over Love Hairy for satisfying the hairy niche. The main negative for We Are Hairy is the price: $34.95/month, or $79.95 for 3 months. Which is very expensive. 03-23-21  07:24am Replies (0) Review 146 Erotica X (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Sometimes has a special discounted price or $5 for the first month. Also, even though the ad did not specify any site except Erotica X, it came with access to the other four sites in the X Empire network. -You get 2 confirming emails on joining. They give you your login details, plus the membership pricing. -You can choose your username and password, to make remembering them easy. -They have a nice model index. -The content is advertised as exclusive. -Login and member pages are secure (https). So your membership should be secure from hacking, and your ISP has fewer records of your site usage. -The network has over 1400 videos. -The site (and network) has an active forum, where you can can interact with other members, models and staff. A lot of the comments seem useless to me: staff congratulating members on earning "Agrees badges" CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION: Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): (if a member makes a comment, and other members agree with the comment, you can earn a "Agrees badge", or staff congratulating members for "First Anniversary badge", for staying a member for 1 year. The forum does cover a wide range of dates and issues, and it can give some useful background on the site/network, if you're into historical data on how the network works. -You do have downloading privileges for the photosets, which download in a zipped file of one definition. -The photosets are collectible. The photos are focused, well-lit and provide a record of each accompanying video. -The tags for a video describe the sex action fairly well. There is also a trailer to give you a better idea of the video action. CONS(START OF): -Although part of Gamma Entertainment (which owns Adult Time), you don't get access to the Adult Time network. -The biller and support are not the regular Adult Time entities, but ones I've never heard of. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): But since they are part of Gamma Entertainment, I hope they will be OK. -The Best Porn states there is a daily download limit of 300GB. But that seems to be a huge amount of data to download, and should not be a problem for most PU members. -Sometimes you are timed out of the site, and have to solve 2 captcha to re-login. -Although the confirming join email stated I had streaming and downloading privileges, it turns out I only have streaming privileges for videos. I can download the photosets. -Slow update rate. The site averages about 2 new scenes per month. Partly the slow update rate can be explained by the covid epidemic, which has halted production for most porn studios. -Search engine is poor: if you put in the search term "Sadie Blair", it returns videos for Sadie Blair, Chanel Preston, Cherie DeVille, Blair Williams, Edyn Blair. -Ads on every page. But at the bottom of the page, so not so bad. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Current number of site videos: 347 scenes. The network has around 1,400 scenes. Average runtime of video: 20-50 minutes. Each video has a matching photoset. All videos have the option to stream in 288p (or 360p) through 1080p. The newer videos posted in the last few years usually have a 4K option. You can add videos to a favorites list. You can stream and download your favorite parts of each video, to save the "good parts". You can play a slideshow of each photoset. The videos and photosets have tags to help you sort/filter the content. You can add your own tags, comments and ratings to the videos and photosets. X Empire network has 5 sites: All Black X Dark X Erotica X Hard X Lesbian X I joined on a special discounted price of $5.00 for the first month. The offer stated it was streaming only, with a membership in Erotic X. It did not mention gaining access to the X Empire network of 5 sites. However, once I joined and got the confirming emails, the emails stated I had access to streaming and downloading privileges. Also, that I had access to all 5 sites in the X Empire network. I don't know whether the ad I joined through was a mistake, or whether the site/network has messed up software, but I was happy to get access to all 5 sites, plus also getting full streaming + downloading privileges for $5 for the first month, recurring at $19.95/month. Note: after going to the member pages, I found that I had access to all 5 sites in the network. I could also stream (photoplay) the photosets, and download them. I could stream the videos, but downloading the videos required a $9.95 upgrade. So the confirmation video was in error: I did not have downloading privileges for the videos. Or, you could argue that downloading privileges for the photosets made the downloading claim true. PU has a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month. That is supposed to give access to the entire X Empire network, with full downloading privileges. I would classify the videos (and photosets) as heartcore style. Many of the videos have a plot where there is some problem between the model and the stunt cock: either they are both in other relationships, or they have a problem with each other emotionally. However, the stunt cock is supposed to be a smooth talker, who quickly convinces the model that they are right for each other, and a few kisses turn into sex. So the emotional feelings are supposed to lift the sex into a meaningful scene, where it's not just lust, but yearning and love and glowing sex. Maybe if Disney opens an X-rated division, they can start making these kinds of films, and put them into the Adult Section of their Disneyland Parks (joke). The selection of models is good. These are not the extremely attractive teen models of the Wow network, or even the very attractive-on-average teen models of the Teen Mega World network, but normally attractive models in their twenties. The models don't look like porn stars, but look like very attractive regular people. Not glammed up. Just good-looking females in their twenties. The videos and photosets are nice settings, nice furniture, the videos are clear, crisp, well shot and focused. Maybe I'm bored with porn right now. I thought the videos and photosets were well done. Not outstanding, but well done. I'm not going to pay the $9.95 upgrade fee because I haven't found any special videos I want to collect. And I have so many other fine memberships already, that I don't need the videos from the Erotica X site. I have Adult Time network, the Wow network, and some other sites that are more than enough to add to my collection. I'm giving the site, with it's access to the X Empire network, a score of 85. It's a nice site, a nice network. But it doesn't impress me enough to extend my membership past the one month mark. 03-22-21  08:15am Replies (0) Review 147 Fantasy Massage (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Fantasy Massage is included in the Adult Time network. So you get access to over 50,000 hard core videos, most of them fine to excellent quality. -Fantasy Massage has over 2,240 massage videos. -You get a wide variety of porn stars, in both age, body type, and sex action. -Login and member pages are secure (https). Less prone to hacking, less records of your usage kept by your ISP. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. One PU member pointed out that Adult Time has a 300 GB daily limit, but that is a huge data allowance. -Most videos have a choice of streaming and download definition of 160p through 1080p. But some of the newer videos go up to 4K. -Most content is exclusive, but some videos might be found on competing sites, such as Teen Mega World (Tricky Masseur), Team Skeet (Rub A Teen), or the Wow network. -There are accompanying photosets for most videos. -Fame Support is excellent. It's 24/7, has live chat, email and telephone access. Cons: -With over 2,240 videos at Fantasy Massage, and another 50,000+ videos at the rest of the Adult Time network, there's a huge amount of content you have to search through to find the content that appeals to you. Too much of a good thing decreases the value of the site. That's a psychological trait. And the navigation can be messy. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. Bottom Line: Fantasy Massage is part of the Adult Time network. It used to be a stand-alone network of 6 or 7 massage-themed sites. It's currently a channel in the Adult Time network of massaged-themed sites. In 2019, the Fantasy Massage network updated 3 times a week. The current update rate is 4 updates per month. When Fantasy Massage was a stand-alone network, it had about 6 or 7 massage-themed sites. Now that Fantasy Massage is part of the Adult Time network, navigation is less precise. If you enter "Fantasy Massage" as a search term for channel content, the search shows 2241 videos. But trying to find what specific sites or videos are part of the Fantasy Massage channel is messed up: Trying to find a simple chronological listing of videos in many channels is unreliable: There's too much content that does not appear in a simple chronological listing, no matter how many clicks you use to find the content in a single channel, especially when the channel has 2,000 or more videos. This is my listing of the sub-channels that make up the Fantasy Massage channel: All Girl Massage Family Sex Massage Fantasy Massage Massage Parlor Milking Table Nuru Massage Soapy Massage Tricky Spa With the different massage sites, you get a variety of massage niches: -Girl on girl massage. -Girl on boy massage. -Boy on girl massage. -Nuru massage. Nuru massage is a Japanese erotic massage technique when both parties are nude and covered with massage lotion. Nuru massage is supposed to reduce stress and often finishes with sex. -You get a fake incest element with the Family Sex Massage, where men and women related by marriage have sex. It's made clear this is not real incest, since the bonds are through marriage and not through blood, but fake incest is a strong niche that's been popular for several years now. I've read that some teens use the line that sex reduces cavities in your teeth, so it's a health measure. What's amazing is that science bears this out: zinc and calcium in semen help prevent tooth decay and prevent plaque from moving into the heart. Strange, but true. I think that using toothpaste with calcium, and taking vitamins with zinc and calcium is a better alternative to swallowing semen. Just my opinion, of course. Since you have over 2,000 massage videos, you have a wide variety of porn actors in this category. Men and women. Teens and MILFS. Body types include slender, medium, and heavy. I guess they are trying to appeal to a mass audience with the talent. Personally, I prefer slender, white, attractive teens, but there's plenty of content to appeal to different tastes. Some fine-looking teens getting a fantasy massage: A few of the attractive teen stars appearing in fantasy massage include: Camila, Carolina Sweets, Catania, Chloe Cherry, Emma Piquet, Janette, Kloe, Lilu Tattoo, Liona Levi, Milana Fox, Mirta, Silvia Jons, Sofia Russo, Stacey Lewis, and Tny. The list of teen stars goes on and on. -Porn models are usually poor actors. Combined with the foolish scripts that are common in porn, the videos can seem stupid, insead of vivid or exciting. That should be one of the strengths of massage videos: very little acting or plot is required. You have a guy or girl come into a room to get a massage, the massage therapist works on the client and the client gradually becomes aroused, and they have sex. So the setup is easy, and can naturally lead into sex. For a low price, you get access to thousands of massage-themed videos and photosets. You also get access to over 50,000 hardcore videos covering a wide variety of niches. I wish the navigation was better, that you could find the content that you find most appealing. In spite of navigation issues, the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today. Although I personally find the Wow network, because of the outstanding quality of their teen models and the quality of their videos and photosets, to be an equally fine offering. 03-21-21  05:12am Replies (0) Review 148 Ultra Films (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -I want to thank PU member Avory for pointing out a special discount that was being offered. For $70, you got access to the 3 sites of the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), plus access to Ultra Films. That access includes unlimited streaming and downloading. I was paying more than that for access to the 3 Wow network sites. And now, not only did I get a lower price, but I also got Ultra Films access thrown in for free. -Site features videos with the following options: 720p, 1080p, 2160p (2160p is UHD). Unlimited streaming, unlimited downloading for videos and photosets. -The content is exclusive. -There is a photoset for each video, with 60 to 75 photos per set. The photos are real photos, not screencaps, clear, crisp images, nicely focused, of these lovely young models. The photosets are definitely worth collecting. -You can view the photos online, in their photo player. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -You can download each photoset in your choice of 4 definitions: 1,000 px, 2,000 px, 4,000 px, and original, which is 4096 x 2160 px. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Updates once daily, or every other day. CONS(START OF): -The cons are relatively minor. The Ultra Films site is a fine addition to the Wow network. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The password for Ultra Films site is computer generated, and it's different from the password for the Wow network sites. -This is a technical issue. You have a membership in one site in the Wow network. But you have access to all 4 sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn, Ultra Films). I don't know why the sites/network define the system that way, but that's the reply the support staff tells you if you ask why you don't have a membership in each separate site. Bottom Line: The current price is $90/year for access to all 4 sites in the network. But you might find a discounted offer of $70/year if you search. I signed up for the Wow Girls email list, and I got an email offer to join the 4 sites for $70 on 2021-03-16 (and have gotten that same offer every few months). Note: I'm calling the 4 sites a network. The company itself calls 3 of the sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) the Wow network, but has added free access to the Ultra Films site for the last 4 months. All Fine Girls and Wow Girls and Wow Porn used to be part of the Diesel network. Then they dropped the name of the Diesel network, except that joining any one of the 3 sites gave you access to all 3 sites. I'm simplifying, because the mechanics of access changed over time. At one time, if you joined All Fine Girls by itself, you would gain access to the other 2 sites if you remained a member of All Fine Girls for a certain period of time. Or, you could pay an upgrade fee and gain access to all 3 sites. There were other ways to gain access to all 3 sites, but that is only historical interest. The current situation is (for the last 4 months) is that if you join any one of the 4 sites, you gain access to all 4 sites. And if you sign up for the Wow email newsletter, you might find the offer of $70/year in your email inbox, every so often. The Ultra Films site features videos with most of the same models (late teens, early 20s white girls from Eastern Europe) that are seen at the Wow network. The girls range from attractive to lovely. They are among the finest collection of hardcore teen models on the internet, and although the site and network are not glamcore, these fresh, young beauties are lovely to watch. The sex action covers the basic themes of hardcore porn: solo masturbation, boy-girl, boy-2 girls, 2 boys 2 girls, girl-girl, 3 or more girls. You get blow jobs, vaginal sex, anal sex, lesbian sex. A smattering of toys, but the models prefer fingers and lips and tongues for solo and lesbian sex. What sets the site and the network apart is how lovely these teen models are: attractive to lovely young teens that are exploring their bodies, either solo, or with other teen girls, or with one or more boys thrown in. It's not glamcore or heartcore, because this is not romantic sex: it's just young girls who really enjoy getting off. And it's beautiful to watch. The videos and photos are clear, crisp images of these lovely teens who are putting on a show for you and seem to be really enjoying themselves. Joie de vivre. It's hardcore, but it's not smut. It's lovely teen girls who really seem to be enjoying themselves with sex. And with some boys who are lucky enough to join in the fun. -Ultra Films is a fine site. But the Wow network of 3 sites are even better sites, because the three sites have far more content, far more models. But to get all 4 sites for less than I was paying for Ultra Films by itself, and far less than I used to pay for the Wow network, seems like a bargain to me. The Wow network is one of the best teen hardcore networks on the internet. The models range from attractive to lovely young teens. The video quality is outstanding. The photographic quality is outstanding. The photosets are not glamcore style, but the images are clear, crisp photos of these young teens that are definitely worth collecting. The Wow network is definitely one of my favorite teen hardcore networks, and I've been a year-long member for several years. I'm giving the Ultra Films site a score of 95. The site is excellent. You get 3 other excellent sites thrown in. You get quality (the attractive young models, the fine quality of the videos and photos, the simplicity of the navigation. This is an excellent site and network for teen hardcore porn. For a price that is a bargain. 03-18-21  12:20am Replies (0) Review 149 Quest For Orgasm (0) 71.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU has a discount of $9.95 for the first month. Recurring at $24.95/mo. -Exclusive content. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -User name is your email address, and you can choose your password, so they are easy to remember. -Video choice of definition: 240p through 1080p. No 4K available for the site. -Since the site focuses on female solo masturbation, the tags do a fine job describing the sex action of the video. -They have a text listing of all the model names at the network (without any thumbnails). You click on a model's name, it brings up the model's page, with large-sized thumbnails of the model, her videos at the network, and hot links to her content, with a very brief physical description of her attributes. -PornDoe has a live cam channel. I'm not into live cams, so I didn't explore the channel. Except the thumbnails show a lot of cute girls. And there are some free videos and clips, mainly from Club Sweethearts, which is the new name for Club Seventeen. Cons: -Poor navigation. For a relatively small site, the site layout is poor. Sometimes the whole network is fucking stupid. You might have to navigate (click) through 2 pages of ads to get to the site you want to examine. Sometimes they present the site in a foreign language, instead of the English language I'm familiar with. Sometimes you are logged out of the network when you switch channels, and when you try to log back in, you have to click through 2 separate pages of ads before you reach the home page. -There are ads on every page in the members area, once you get past the 2 separate pages that are only ads. -Archive site. The last update was apparently Sep 04, 2017. -They have a photoset for each video, but the photosets contain maybe 10 to 14 photos per set, and are not worth collecting. -Two pre-checked cross-sales on join page. Be sure to uncheck the cross-sales, because they are limited trials that quickly turn into expensive memberships. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -There is a download limit of 100 videos per month, for the network. A download from any site in the network counts toward that limit. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): -Quest For Orgasm has 80 Scenes. So it's a small site. But you get access to the Lets Doe It network, which has around 15 sites. The star of the network is The White Boxxx, where they select attractive models and present them in glamcore style as some of the finest, most attractive models on the internet. -You can sort the videos by newest, most popular, most viewed, or by longest. -The models range from OK-looking, to attractive, to very attractive. But much more effort is put into making the models more attractive and glamorous at some of the other sites in the network, especially The White Boxxx site. The models are white, Eastern European girls, late teens to early 30s. The videos have a runtime from about 28 minutes to about 40 minutes at Quest For Orgasm. The videos start out with an interview with the model, her life, why she got into porn, what she likes about porn, her hobbies. Trying to make the models seem real, that the models are normal people. After the interview, the model takes off her clothes and uses different toys to achieve orgasm. Aside from the lousy navigation (the ads, the site time-outs), I didn't find most of the masturbation scenes that erotic. There is no fantasy element. It's porn stars using dildos to achieve orgasm. Add that it's an archive site with no new content. Add that there's little effort put into making the models attractive. I signed up for a one-year membership to the network. But the increased ads and the fast time-out and the increased difficulty of using the network mean this is my last membership to the network. I don't have the patience to keep clicking through to find the content that I like. That's in spite of how gorgeous some of these models are. This is one of the poorer sites in the network. I'm giving the site a score of 71. 03-14-21  11:01pm Replies (0) Review 150 Bad Daddy POV (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -The site is part of the Full Porn Network, which advertises that is has over 15 different sites. I counted 21 sites currently. -Can use PayPal or Epoch as your biller. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Site updates with 1 new video every 5 days. -Videos come with a photoset and screen cap set. -The videos are crystal cleal, crisp, good lighting, good sound control, nice sets, etc. -They advertise 4K definition for some of the videos. However, at this site, the maximum definition is 1080p. -You can comment on the videos, but many of the videos have no member comments. -Videos come with tags that basically describe the sex action/plot of the video. -You can choose 1024 or 1600 zip for your photosets. -Unlimited streaming and downloading, as far as I can tell. -Download options include: 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K. The site shows a 4K option for some videos, but the links to download 4K and 1080p didn't work for me. Cons: -Expensive site and expensive network. $119.88 for the first year. Or $39.95/month. But I joined at $60 for the first year, on a holiday promotion. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -First member page after logging in is a page of ads, no site content. -Ads at top and bottom of each member page. -The level of attractiveness of the models is below average for many teen sites such as Teen Mega World, and far below the average of the Wow network models. -Videos are often 10 minutes runtime or less. -Streaming options are 480p and 720p for the latest site videos. Which is disappointing, because the network advertises 4K videos. -Many photosets are small. Only 15 photos per set. The photos are excellent, shot by a professional photographer, well-focused, well-lighted, but the action covered is only a part of the video. However, when the photosets are larger, the quality of the photos goes way down. I don't know if it's a photoshop problem or what. Sets are not worthwhile collecting. Bottom Line: A partial listing of the sites you get access to with a membership in the network: Analized Bad Daddy POV DTF Sluts James Deen Only Prince POV Perverts Twisted Visual Your Mom Does Porn The James Deen site is the most famous site in the network. James Deen is the owner of the network, and he has made a name for himself in the porn world, with a lot of female fans who think he is not only cute, but strong and dominant in the way he treats women in his videos. The network features rough sex, a lot of anal sex, where the women are treated like sluts. The site theme is fake incest: a bad stepfather has sex with his stepdaughter. The site is supposed to be educational. Which is misleading. I didn't find any helpful clues about how to treat a girl during sex. The intro section of each video starts with the disclaimer: "ATTENTION The performance you are about to watch is meant for entertainment purposes only. It should not be seen as a model for real-life sexual encounters. We recommend honest, clear, and ongoing communication with your partner(s) before any sexual encounter. All actors in this film are consenting adults who follow specific adult industry regulations. Please have fun, respect each other, and practice safe sex." However, that disclaimer is for legal purposes only. In an interview James Deen gave, he said underage teens could watch his videos and get a good idea of how to have exciting sex. The titles of some of the videos seem to be instructional. For example, "Brooke Haze: Helps You Cum With Jerk Off Instructions". I was slightly disappointed with that video, and other videos with a similar title. For one thing, the video is a solo model video, where the girl role-plays being your step-daughter and slowly strips while talking dirty. I was hoping a guy would be there, and the girl could show you the best way to masturbate while watching the video. But I guess you're left on your own, to figure out how to masturbate, because there is no guy in the video showing you the best moves. Actually, the Jerk Off Instruction videos follow the same pattern. A short video, 10 minutes or less, features a teen model stripping and talking dirty. So there's no real instruction. The model touches herself, but if there's any passion, it's in what you yourself bring to the video. The model is putting on a show, so if that's enough to get you off, fine. But many porn site videos with solo models feature masturbation, and this site, for the Jerk Off Instruction series, is mainly tease with dirty talking. When I say tease, I mean the dirty talking, the self-fondling, the nudity is supposed to turn you on, because you are watching young girls playing with themselves and stripping and role-playing talking to you as their daddy. The videos where the girl is with a stunt cock are better. The girl and her step-father have sex. The step-father is usually off-screen. I guess you are supposed to place yourself into the scene as the step-father. Sometimes the step-father punishes the girl by slapping her ass, but it's mild punishment, and the girl undressses following the step-father's instructions, because slapping a girl's ass covered by clothes is not as effective or as fun as slapping a naked ass. And you need a way to get the clothes off the girl if you're going to fuck her anyway. (The plots are simple in the site videos.) The sex at the site is less rough and not as brutal as some of the other sites in the network. The girls put on a show, and the idea of sex with your stepdaughter is prominent, but the girls don't show a lot of resistance at having sex with their stepfather. Sex with a step- is supposed to be kinky, but a common theme in porn in the last few years. I thought the site was one of the tamer sites in the network. The network mainly features rough sex, anal sex, and treating the girls as sluts who want to be dominated. This site features girls who are role-playing to a step-father who wants to have sex with his daughter. 03-05-21  01:27am Replies (1) Shown : 126-150 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.36 seconds.