Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : LKLK (0)

Feedback:   All (518)  |   Reviews (162)  |   Comments (40)  |   Replies (316) Other:   Replies Received (290)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 151-175 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 151 Anal Teen Angels (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -A large channel with 568 videos. I got the 568 video count from a listing of all videos under the Anal Teen Angels site, but see the con section to see why that count is not reliable. -Almost all the vids have a matching photoset, a zip file for easy downloading. -Almost all the vids feature late teen, early twenty models from Eastern Europe who are mainly white, slender, usually attractive. -Each video features a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what the featured model looks like, and the thumbnails are gifs that show you a brief sketch of the video action. -The earliest videos offer 160p, 480p, 540p from 2009. -The default file name of a video includes the video title_model name_file definition. To be inclusive, you can manually add the date posted and the site name. -Video runtime is 30 minutes or less for the early videos, but the videos of the last few years have a runtime of 40 minutes or less. -Site is still updating in 2021. Cons: -Slow update rate. Site updates with 1 or 2 videos per month. -Some links to download a video definition lead to a 404 error, page not found. So can't download the video in a definition that is supposed to be available. -Many of the early videos are from other sites, like Devils Film or 21 Sextury. So when I say the number of videos is 568, that is what one page displays, and the pages add up to 568 videos from my personal count of the pages listed. But a different page displays 276 video total for Anal Teen Angels, and a different page lists 375 videos for the Anal Teen Angels site. And a still different page shows a count of 374 videos for Anal Teen Angels. I only counted all the pages shown for the 568 video count, not bothering to count the individual pages for the other counts listed. -The 160p and 240p definition videos are not worth watching: the sets are cheap, the lighting is poor, the picture quality is poor. -The listing of videos in chronological order is not in order. Bottom Line: The site has a large number of videos. All the videos I saw had some anal action, although there is plenty of other types of sex. A solo girl might be playing with a dildo, but if she sticks it up her ass, that counts for anal action. However, most of the anal action is boy-girl, where the guy sticks his dick up her ass. So if you're into anal action, this site will give you a massive amount of hardcore anal sex. But you also get solo girl, girl-girl, and girl-girl-girl action, as well. It's like a smorgasbord of sexual partners. The models are Eastern Europe, mainly teens to early twenties. A lot of the models are cute. That you've seen featured at Teen Mega World, the Wow network, Teen Skeet, even some models at MetArt and other premium glamour sites. Some of the model names are familiar, but in the porn world, a familiar model can easily have a different name than the one you normally see her with. That's porn world, where a model can have 1 common name, or even 5 to 10 names at different sites. Over the years, they upgraded the sets, the video equipment, and the videos have shown a lot of improvement over the years. They started offering 1080p video maybe 8 years ago at this site. They started offering 4K video around 2019. The main value of the site is the large amount of cute teen models, doing hardcore sex, including anal sex. The branding of these videos is messed up. The site started around 2009. The first videos used the "Anal Teen Angels" logo. Then, in 2010, the videos used the "21 Sextury" logo, even though the videos had a link by the thumbnail stating "Anal Teen Angels". And if you look at the early videos at the site, under the Adult Time network, which the site is part of, you can find a lot of videos with the "Devils Film" logo displayed on the video. So it's confusing, if you want to search for the videos that belong to Anal Teen Angels, because, like I said, the site will give you different counts for the number of videos that belong to the site, depending on which page you are looking at. Bottom Line: Forget the purist approach. By subscribing to the Adult Time network, or the Anal Teen Angels site, you gain access to a huge amount of hardcore teen anal sex, along with other types of sex. The site is mainly boy/girl, but there's plenty of girl-girl, with some solo girl and multiple girl sex. All the sex includes some form of anal play. So for people who enjoy anal, this site should be a worthwhile sub. And the Adult Time network has a boatload of other hardcore anal sex videos, as well as plenty of other hardcore sex action. The Adult Time network has around 54,000 hardcore videos, covering a wide variety of niches. 03-01-21  03:58am Replies (0) Review 152 Casual Teen Sex (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -If you want to join any of the sites in the network, join through the 18Videoz site. The reason: $60/year is the normal price for joining the 18Videoz network. But if you join through one of the sites in the network, you will probably pay: $29.95/month, or $39.95 for 3 months. -The models are young teens and mainly very attractive. They are Eastern European girls, and if you've joined Teen Mega World, the Wow network, Team Skeet, you've probably seen a lot of these models already. -Part of the 18Videoz network. So you get access to 16 sites. Which is a large number of sites. -They advertise daily updates for the network. But the actual update rate is 5 or 6 times per week for the network. The update rate for the Casual Teen Sex site itself is 2-4 videos per month. -The login is secure (https). -Started adding 4K definition on Nov 28, 2016 on some new network videos. But the highest definition at Casual Teen Sex videos is still 1080p. -Upgraded the video player on May 30, 2016. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -You can favorite videos, models, and photosets. -Physical data on the models includes: age(when shot), DOB, Nationality, Ethnicity, Height, Weight, Hair Color, Eye Color. CONS(START OF): Major cons: -The main con is the site (and network) don't showcase the models as attractively as they should be presented. Many of these girls are found at Teen Mega World, the Wow network, even some on MetArt. At Teen Mega World, the same girls are prettier. At the Wow network, they usually look even better. And if they appear at the MetArt site, they look even more attractive. So the impact of the girls videos at Casual Teen Sex is diminished. I mean some of these girls are attractive to fucking gorgeous, but you wouldn't know it from watching these videos. The site (and the network) is trying to provide a casual, everyday visual experience of a fly-on-the-wall of these sexual encounters, but they are wasting the physical beauty of the models. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Minor cons: -Every so often, your password will not be accepted. So you have to re-set your password. Which is easy. You have to solve a captcha to re-set your password. -The username and password are computer-generated, so you have to write them down or use a password manager to remember them, because your mind won't remember either the username or the password assigned to you (unless you have a photographic memory). -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Sound control when scenes are outdoor is sloppy. You hear extraneous loud noises, such as the wind or whatever. -The models usually speak in some Eastern European language, with no subtitles. But once the models start moaning and groaning, from arousal or excitement, subtitles aren't needed. -The 3 larger thumbnails at the top of the members page are ads, which you realize after clicking on them and, instead of bringing up a video to watch, you bring up a new site to join. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The site (and network) is hardcore teen porn. -The network has 3,316 videos. -The network has 2,287 models. -The network has 217,718 pictures. I wrote that the 18Videoz network has 16 sites you get access to. You get 2 additional bonus sites, which include Teens Analyzed and 18 Pussy Club. The 2 bonus sites are technically not part of the 18Videoz network. Until late 2020, Teens Analyzed (and probably 18 Pussy Club) were part of the 18Videoz network. You still get access to the 2 sites, with a membership in the Videoz network, except the 2 sites are now considered "bonus sites". This is the first time I've ever seen this: sometimes the member pages are non-secure, and sometimes they are secure. But the login is always secure, as far as I can tell. The site theme is a guy picking up a new girl on the street. They talk for a few minutes, then go to an apartment and kiss and then have sex. So the setup to the sex lasts a few minutes. But the girls are hot to trot. If, instead of a guy picking up a girl on the street, a guy might come over to a girl's apartment, to fix an appliance, or to just meet her. And since the girl is horny, and the guy picks up on her signals right away, they are soon touching and stroking each other and having sex. So not a lot of plot or build-up to the sex. The site started in late 2009. Currently the site has 416 videos, with matching photosets. The earliest videos feature cheap sets, cheap street wear costumes. The earliest videos have 240p to 480p definition. 1080p definition was introduced in 2010. As time went on, the sets featured better apartments, better street wear costumes, and better equipment to videotape the scenes. But the plot, or lack of it, remained the same: boy meets girl, they start kissing and fondling in a few minutes, and then the sex. The main attraction, other than the hardcore sex, which becomes boring after a while because it's so repetitious, is how cute the teen girls are. But as I said, these girls are not presented as attractively as they should be. So the videos lack impact. Giving the site a score of 80. The girls are attractive. The sex is hardcore. But the thrill is gone, baby. I want to watch something that is arousing, erotic, has some story or passion to give the sex some meaning or impact. 02-27-21  08:56pm Replies (0) Review 153 The Life Erotic (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the MetArt network. So the basic site structure is basically the same for all the MetArt network of 15+ sites. This means you get all the trimmings of a first-class photo oriented site: -High, medium and low resolution zips for each photoset. -Complete model listing with large-sized thumbnails of the models, with links to each model's content at the site. -Superior support for email which is 24/7. But a live chat option would be even better. The support staff will go out of their way to help with any requests. Probably the finest support of any network, except for Vendo and Famesupport, both of which have a live chat option plus the standard email and telephone support that is 24/7. -Easy navigation. Can search by model's name, or by title of the photoset or video, or by date posted. -Good update rate. They update with a new video or photoset every 2 days, which they've continued even during the covid epidemic. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Most of the content is exclusive. But some of the older content is from other sites. If you're a porn expert, you might recognize some of the content from Teen Mega World or other competing sites. -PU has a discounted price of $19.99/month. Regular price is $29.99/month. -No download or streaming limits. Which is nice, in this era of sites setting daily or monthly limits for downloads. -All videos have a choice of 270p through 1080p. Videos posted from Mar 15, 2015 on have a 4K option. CONS(START OF): -Cons are basically minor. -Searching by posting date is a little clunky. The main Metart site used to have a simpler system, where each year was laid out more easily. But now you have to find the link for each year and each month you want to search, which takes more clicks. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites, but a little disappointing for a premium porn site that's part of the Metart network. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Videos start with the standard Metart intro visual and theme music, which lasts less than 1 minute. I wish they would drop the intro visual and theme music, which they use for many of the videos at the different Metart network sites. It's a form of advertising, but it's waste of time to watch. I'm being picky, but after seeing the same intro to over 1,000 different videos at the Metart sites, I wish they would eliminate it, or have an option to skip past the intro section. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The Life Erotic shares some of the models from the Metart.com site, but also uses a lot of models that are more into midcore. The main Metart.com site is strictly softcore glamcore (although they have been trying to make it a little edgier, with some of the photosets and videos allowing the models to fondle themselves a little). The Life Erotic mainly features female mastubation. There is also some solo nudity and some lesbian sex. To add spice, the model can use toys, fancy costumes, ropes or chains for a hint of BDSM. Some of the videos can be intriguing or amusing. One video with Riya, a cute, tiny (5' 2") blonde, aged 18, has Riya walk into her kitchen get a glass of water. She drinks some water, notices a banana, sucks on it, rubs the banana on her crotch, get a condom from a drawer, puts the condom over the banana, and inserts the banana into her pussy. First time I've seen a banana getting a condom. Riya then masturbates with the condonized banan. After she reaches orgasm, she removes the banana, removes the condom and throws it away, then peels the banana and eats it, pumping it in and out her mouth as she savors its sweet flesh… One of the main lessons from this site is that girls don't need boys to get off: a toy (or fingers) can be an excellent substitute for a boy. Or even another girl. Metart is supposed to be erotic glamcore without any sex, just nudity. No boys allowed at the site (except for male photographers or videographers). The Life Erotic is erotic glamcore with sex. Mainly solo masturbation by the models, with and without toys, with and without costumes. But there are also some lesbian scenes. Again, no boys allowed at the site. Comparing the two sites, Metart is probably the premier softcore site on the internet, for several different reasons: -The vast number of photosets (22,264). -The vast number of models (3,813). -The large number of contributing photograpers (289) who can give you their personal viewpoint on the photosets. -4 updates daily, except 6 updates on the first of each month. -The complete model listing with large-sized thumbnails that show you what the models look like, and that have links to their content at the site. -The easy navigation of the site, in spite of the massive amount of content. -And a number of bells and whistles that make it easy to format the site offerings to your individual taste. The Life Erotic is a much smaller site. Instead of the softcore approach of the Metart site, The Life Erotic shows the models as sexual creatures. Like Metart, there are no boys at The Life Erotic site, but the girls show you that boys aren't needed to get off: the solo nude scenes, with and without masturbation, can be very erotic, especially with the right costumes and toys and the implied story line behind the photosets and videos. And the lesbian scenes, which are in the minority, also show some edge in presenting the models. Both sites have a huge number of attractive models. Most of the models are white, mainly from Eastern Europe, but there are a few Asian, African, and Latina models, but non-white are definitely in the minority. If you want a more erotic site than Metart, The Life Erotic might be a good choice. Both sites have the same price of $19.95/month, with a discount from PU. I suggest a 1-month sub to both sites, if you have the money, to see which site you enjoy more. 02-17-21  03:26pm Replies (0) Review 154 Erotic Beauty (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Site is part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a premium setup: Easy navigation, lots of attractive models, all the bells and whistles you find at the other MetArt sites: multiple definitions for photosets, unlimited downloads, numerous contributing phototographers, easy navigation, etc. Cons: -Slow update rate. You get 2 photosets per week. Since photosets are the only content offered, that is a major fault. -There are no bonus features at the site. Or maybe you can call the cam shows a bonus feature, but that is the same standard pay cam show featured at all the Metart sites. -The are no videos at the site. A minor fault, since most Metart videos tend to be boring, in spite of the lovely models. -At least some of the photoset updates were probably shot years ago. By models who apparently retired years ago. This includes Camilla A, Caramel, etc. Actually, many sites in the Metart network are running out of sets photographed recently due to the covid epidemic, and are using old content as updates. -I think the Erotic Beauty online slideshow player is clunky: you have a choice of a large thumbnail which only takes a small portion of your monitor, or an enlarged photo that expands beyond the limits of your monitor. The enlarged photo is meant for detailed viewing. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): I want a simple slideshow player that fits the image onto the monitor, which is what most other sites offer. -The photosets offer fewer tags (descriptors) than most Metart sites. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Erotic Beauty is not a poor site. But when you compare it to Metart, it suffers. Metart updates with 4 new photosets or videos per day, except on the first of each month, it has 6 updates. Erotic Beauty updates with 2 photosets per week. Metart has far more contributing photographers, so you get a wider range of styles. Metart photographers: 289 Erotic Beauty photographers: 189 The catalog of Metart is massive: 22,234 photosets versus 5,243 at Erotic Beauty. The number of models at Metart: 3,811. Models at Erotic Beauty: 2,184. Number of videos at Metart: 1,781. Erotic Beauty videos: 0 (Except most videos at Metart are boring and a waste of space. Not worth collecting, no matter how lovely the models are in real life.) The membership price for Erotic Beauty is the same as the price for Metart. So if you're going to join one of the Metart glamour sites for the photosets, choose Metart. Erotic Beauty comes in a distant second. Note: if you're wondering why I've been a member for over 12 months, years ago I found a special offer of $1/month membership. So for $1 a month, I'm still a member. 02-09-21  05:45am Replies (4) Review 155 All Fine Girls (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -All Fine Girls belongs to the Wow network (they recently re-branded the 3 sites into the Wow Network, that years ago, was called the Diesel network. But they dropped the Diesel network name years ago, and for some reason, separated the All Fine Girls site from the 2 Wow sites. For a while, membership in the 3 sites was complicated. But for the last few years, if you joined any one of the 3 sites, you automatically got access to all 3 sites in what is now called the Wow network. -There is a special membership discount the last few months. You get the 3 regular sites (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) plus the Ultra Films site, for $89.95/year. Normally, the Wow network by itself charges more than that. But here, you're getting the Ultra Films site thrown in for free, plus a large discount on the Wow network. The regular price on the Ultra Films site, by itself, is $90/year. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -The level of models at the Wow network and the Ultra Films site is probably the finest collection of teens on the internet. The models range from cute to gorgeous. If you've had any porn experience, you've probably seen many of these models at TMW, MetArt, and many other fine sites, but they are displayed at this site (and network) in glorious living color. And they put on a show that's worth watching. -There are numerous technical features for streaming and downloading. -Streaming and downloading are unlimited. A few years ago, they offered a streaming only option for a lower price, but they dropped the streaming only option. -You get the choice of streaming in 480p through 4K. -You get the choice of downloading in 480p through 4K. -You can also choose a frame rate of 30fps or 60fps. -You can select the parts of a video you want to steam or download (if you want to skip to your favorite parts of the video). -Login and member pages are secure (https). Bottom Line: CONS(START OF): -With a discounted price of $90/year for the Wow network, and with Ultra Films site thrown in for free, the cons are minor. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Customer support can be slow to respond to questions or problems. -They used to have a page for member questions, that was dropped many years ago. -Note: if you pay the $90/year for membership, technically they give you a membership to one site. You are not a member of the other 3 sites, even though you have access to them. This was confirmed by customer support at Wow Girls. Although you are not a member of 3 of the sites, your login details still work at each site, so somehow you are both a member and non-member. -No bio data on the models, or physical data. BOTTOM LINE(START 0F): This is one of the better memberships on the internet. The reasons: -The models are pretty to fucking gorgeous. And the photography and videos show how gorgeous they are. This is not a glamcore or heartcore site or network, but it's borderline glamcore. The models don't wear glamourous costumes, but they wear nice clothes, the sets are very nice, the photography and videos are excellent: crisp and vivid images, excellent technical control (good focus, good sound control, good lighting, everything is good to excellent). -The membership price is a bargain. $89/year for access to the Wow network plus Ultra Films. I paid around $120/year just for the Wow network alone, until I found a special discount for around $90. That didn't include the Ultra Films site, which I paid for separately. And now you get the 4 sites for $90/year, which I think is a fantastic bargain. You get access to the 4 sites, but only membership in one site. If you want to be nit-picky. Bottom line summary: The Wow network and Ultra Films for $90/year is a fantastic bargain. The girls are cute to gorgeous. The videos and photosets are excellent. You don't have any foolish problems about poor acting, washed out colors, stupid plots: it's just a pleasure to watch these girls put on a show for you. The site and network is laid out intelligently, making navigation simple and easy. You get numerous choices on streaming and downloading videos and photosets. The model listing is first-rate, with large thumbnails of the girls to show you exactly what they look like. There are plenty of tags and filters if you need help navigating. 02-09-21  02:58am Replies (3) Review 156 My Family Pies (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -MyFamilyPies is part of the Nubiles Porn network. The Nubiles Porn network is a fine network, where, in the main, the videos are crisp and clear, and well lighted. What a change from the Bang My Teen Ass site, the last site I reviewed, where the videos were washed out and the naturally attractive teen models were blah. At My Family Pies, you get crisp images of how lovely some of these models are. Chloe Cherry, Haley Reed, Katie Kush, Kyler Quinn,Lady D, Stacy Cruz, Tiffany Tatum, and Zazie are just some of the cute models featured at the site. -Video definition runs from 270p through 1080p for most videos. They started offering 4K video definition for new videos at the site in October 2020, so the 4K option is definitely in the minority. -PU has a special discount: monthly: $14.98 yearly: $99.95 Sometimes you can find a yearly membership at $84. -Content is exclusive. -Navigation is easy. -Excellent search engine. -121+ photos per photoset. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): You also get a photoset of the same scene with screencaps. The sceencap photosets have a condensed number of screencaps, maybe 43. The idea of the screencap photoset is to save storage space, I guess. I think the photo photosets, if the model is really cute, are the better choice to collect. The images of the photos versus the screencaps are much crisper and better focused. -They don't have a trailer for the videos, but the tags show you what the action will be in the video. Or you can play a slideshow of the photoset as a preview. -There is a model listing for each site that can be arranged alphabetically, by posting date, or by rating. The model listing is nice-sized thumbnails that give you a good idea of what the model looks like. CONS(START OF): -The major con is how thin and stupid the plots are. And the acting is amateur. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -If you can ignore the stupid plots and lame acting (which is hard to do), many of the models are attractive young teens, and the sex can be OK. -The models and stunt cocks speak English in the videos, but with an accent. I assume they are from Eastern Europe originally. I would prefer subtitles instead. I know many people don't like reading subtitles when watching a movie or video, but I don't mind. But the strange accents are irritating for me. (Maybe I need to start taking tranquilizers when I watch my porn?) -Irregular update rate. You might get 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 new videos in a month. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Site theme: In today's world, divorce is common. So when divorced people remarry, they often make a blended family, with children from each parent. This site shows that the blended step-children can have sex with each other (which I call fake incest, since the videos make clear there is no real incest by blood relations), and the step-children can also have sex with their step-parents. So the taboo factor is supposed to make the sex hotter. Fake incest, also some young-old sex when the step parents have sex with the step children. I much prefer the Pure Taboo site (part of the Adult Time network) for the story-driven plots of taboos, which has cinematic quality videos, and excellent acting by the models). Pure Taboo is a much finer site, but the MyFamilyPies does feature some cute models, and if you can ignore or accept the stupid plots and poor acting, the sex can be watchable. Or the sex can be boring. What I like about the site is the sets are nice, the lighting is excellent, some of the models are cute. The site is well organized, is easy to navigate, and there are plenty of technical features to stream or download the videos and photosets. But the stupid plots and the poor acting ruin the videos. Maybe you could ignore the videos, which should be the main draw of the site, and slideshow the photosets. This would erase the stupid dialog, the stupid plot, the poor acting. And you could create your own plot to explain the slideshow. Except it would take a genius to create an intelligent plot for the slideshow. Because the female models and the stunt cocks usually act like morons, and the slideshows (even without dialogue) show this clearly. I know I'm being harsh. I just can't get past the stupid plots and poor acting. I suspect the models are trying for a comedic effect, because the plots make very little sense, but I would prefer the Teen Mega World style, or the Wow Porn style, of straight sex, with a little plot thrown in, but good hardcore sex. And the stupid plots at MyFamilyPies get in the way of any enjoyment of the sex. Giving the site a score of 78. 02-08-21  12:24am Replies (0) Review 157 Bang My Teen Ass (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the 18videoz network. You get access to 18 sites. -You have network access to over 3,000 videos. That is a large amount of hardcore videos. -Starting Feb 17, 2017, the site and network gives expired members free limited access to our website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in your member zone. If your password stopped working you can reset it on login page or ask our support for help. -Starting Nov 28, 2016, the network offered 4K video quality for their latest movies. -Many of the videos and photosets are exclusive. There are videos that have been sold to competing sites. So it depends on your porn experience whether you will come across videos you've seen before. -Updated the video player (for streaming videos) on May 30, 2016. -Vendo is the default biller. A trusted name. I've used Vendo many times over the years and never had a problem. -All Bang My Teen Ass videos offer definitions of 272p through 1080p. Cons: -Even with a PU discount, the membership fee is very high. However, I found a holiday special of $59.95/year to join 18Videoz.com directly. Normal PU discount is: Monthly: $29.95 Multi-Mo: $39.95 (2 months, recurs $19.95/mo.) Multi-Mo: $49.95 (3 months, non-recurring) -Archive site. Last update was Feb 2, 2015. -Small site. 96 videos. -Some of the videos can be seen at other porn sites, such as Teen Mega World. -I wish the videos had brighter lighting, better clarity. For a 1080p video, it's slightly disappointing. I much prefer the videos at Teen Mega World, which seem more vibrant. And the videos at the Wow Porn sites are better still. -Login is not secure. Member pages are not secure. --Every so often, you have to re-set your password. I'm not sure if this is because it's a security measure, or if your password has been hacked. -Ads on member pages. You click on the thumbnail of a pretty girl, and a different site pops up to join that new site. Bottom Line: -Network stats: -Movies: 3311 -Models: 2286 -Photosets: 2554 Site theme: Teens getting fucked in the ass. Although the site name implies the site concentrates on anal sex, in my opinion, the site name is just a generic name that tries to attract anal lovers, but doesn't really live up to the promise. Yes, there is some anal sex. But it's just a small part of the action. The site is small, and the action is standard porn with some breast licking and sucking, cunnilinges, blowjob, vaginal sex, and anal sex thrown in. I don't think anal lovers will be impressed by the site: If you want glamcore anal sex, I think Tushy would be a better choice. Because Tushy is not only glamcore, but it definitely concentrates on anal sex. I said the models are not impressive. Actually, the site features many of the same Eastern European models you have seen at TMW and the Wow sites and other porn sites. So the models can be cute, but they are not presented attractively. You have teen girls that, at competing sites, might be cute to extremely attractive, but at this site they just seem blah. I'm talking Olivia Grace, Taissia Shanti, Foxy Di, Margarita C, Anika A and others who not only appear at TMW, Wow sites, but even MetArt and other fine photo sites. But the Wow sites make the models so much more attractive in their scenes, and even the TMW sites do a better job presenting these models. These models are fucking attractive, but their scenes at Bang My Teen Ass are disappointing. The girls don't come across as super-attractive, and the scenes lack heat. I'm giving the site a score of 78. First, it's an archive site: last update was Feb 2, 2015. It's a small site, with 96 videos. The videos are meh. Boring, in spite of how cute the models can be at sites that present the models more attractively, in scenes with better heat or passion. Navigation is easy, because it's a small site, and you get access to the 18videoz network, which has 18 sites to browse. So there is plenty of hardcore videos at the network to browse, but this site lacks heat or visual appeal. Am I spoiled by my long association with porn? The site has many porn starlets that are just more attractive and show better heat at other sites, and that's why it doesn't deserve a higher score. You're watching a scene in 1080p, and it seems like the colors are washed out and faded. I don't know if it's because the scenes are from years ago, or if they were shot on poor equipment. But these girls deserve to be presented more attractively, with crisper images, with better heat. 02-06-21  09:10pm Replies (0) Review 158 Nubiles.net (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -The most valuable site in the Nubiles Porn network. The site is like an encyclopedia of teen porn stars. Many of them are featured early in their career at this site. -Login is easy, once you learn how to access Nubiles.net from the Nubiles Porn network. You have to use the drop-down menu that shows all the sites included in Nubiles Porn. Or, you can sign in to the site directly: your login details should work for any site in the network. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Navigation is easy. The site is laid out in a simple, logical manner. You can search the model listing, or can use the search engine to find a model's content. -The model listing is excellent: Nice sized thumbnails to show you what the model looks like. -Content is exclusive. -Streaming and downloads go from 270p thru 1080p. I didn't find any 4K video options. -Zip files in 3 definitions for photosets: small, medium, large. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. Cons: -Basically the cons are minor, as long as you remember a few ideas. -Nubiles.net is part of the Nubiles Porn network. Some reviews state that Nubiles.net is not part of the Nubiles Porn network, and the Nubiles Porn network often does not make it clear that Nubiles.net is included. So you could wind up paying separately for Nubiles.net, even when it's included in your Nubiles Porn membership. -Use a PU discount to join, or wait for a holiday discount. Regular membership prices are high. $29.32/month $199.00/year With a PU discount, the prices are: $14.98/month $99.95/year But you can often find holiday discounts for yearly price of $84/year. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Ads. You have an ad page you have to pass through to get to the members area. Also ads on every members page. But ads are normal for porn sites, and some of the ads feature very low membership prices. -Your access to the site can sometimes expire if you don't click on the site every so often. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): So remember your login details, because even with cookies enabled, you have to re-enter your login details to enter the site. Many other sites, with cookies enabled, allow you entrance almost automatically, but not this network. -Some of the videos are very simple. It's like you are going back in time, when you see a young girl doing ordinary things, picking up a flower, looking at knicknacks on a dresser, moving around a room, but the model is so pretty, you keep watching for the "good parts" (naked flesh) to come. So it's a tease, but somehow, it's more erotic and interesting than many of the older MetArt videos, which were famously boring in spite of the lovely naked models. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The main value of the site is the massive catalog of teen models. Many of them were photographed and videoed early in their career. The models are mainly attractive to gorgeous. Nubiles.net is not a glamcore site. Or mainly a hardcore site. It's an encyclopedia of young models, mostly at the start of their porn career. There are hardcore videos, and softcore videos, and a wealth of photosets. The videos and photosets are professionally shot, with good lighting, good sound control, OK sets (not cheap sets, but not glamourous). The vibe is you are watching these girls in their natural state, the models are putting on a show for you, they are aware there is a camera watching, but it's not over-the-top hardcore action or softcore glamour, but a chance to watch these tender young girls The site theme for Nubiles.net is "Freshest girls on the net." This refers to the idea that the site features many of the teen models early in their careers. This is probably the finest encyclopedia of porn starlets on the internet, with photosets and videos. Most of the videos are softcore, but there is also a goodly amount of hardcore videos for some models. The photosets and videos are not glamcore, but they are good quality and worth collecting, especially for your favorite models. I have a problem with favorite models: With new models coming out every year, my favorite listing includes hundred of models, which is both good and bad: good, because I have lots of models to thumb through, bad because my enthusiasm tends to wander, and I don't give enough attention to all these lovelies that they deserve. Which is a good thing: new, lovely models keep popping up at websites throughout the year. I'm giving nubiles.net a score of 95. It's one of the finest sites for teen porn starlets on the internet. Don't expect over-the-top hardcore action. You get some hardcore action for some models, but most of the models are softcore (or mid-core, if you classify masturbation as mid-core). Nubiles.net is part of the Nubiles Porn network, so you get access to 18 sites in the Nubiles Porn network. Which gives you a large number of sites to browse. Many of the Nubiles Porn sites stopped updating years ago, but Nubiles.net updates with 1 to 3 videos per day. And the Nubiles Porn network updates weekly on an irregular basis. Bottom line summary: Don't expect explosive hardcore action: but if you want to find content about a teen starlet early in her career, this is the place to visit. You get over 2,000 models, many of them are cute to gorgeous. You get a site that's easy to browse, with good search engine, excellent model listing. So sit back and enjoy the lovely models. 02-04-21  10:38pm Replies (0) Review 159 Girls Only Porn (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: Note: I said I was a member of the site for over 1 year. That's because I was a member of Nubile Films for over one year, which is the main site of what I will call the Nubile Films network. The Girls Only Porn site is a recent bonus to the Nubile Films site. Or you could say, technically, I've only been a member of Girls Only Porn for a few months. PROS(START OF): -Girls Only Porn is the newest addition to the Nubile Films network. Nubile Films used to be a standalone site, with no extra sites. But recently they've been adding new sites to the membership. Hot Crazy Mess and The Sitcom Show were the first two sites added. But recently they added Girls Only Porn site. -Username is your email address. -Can choose your own password. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Can join with credit card, paypal, checking account, EU direct debit. -They are having a special of $84/year recently. I have no idea how long that special discount will last. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Girls Only Porn is a good addition to the Nubile Films network. It's quality lesbian porn. The Nubile Films site is also a quality porn site, with excellent, quality porn that is crystal clear video, excellent technical features, streaming and downloading in 270p through 4K, -Each video has a photoset. -Photosets average around 38 photos per set. The photos are screen caps, but excellent quality, you can't tell the difference between these screencaps and real photos. -The photoset downloads in a zip file that is only one definition: 3840x2160px. The photoset downloads with the name of the scene, but you need to add the model names, date posted, site. -Number of videos at site = 368. The site videos go back to August 2012. So the site has been around a long time. But it's only recently that it was added as a bonus site to the Nubile Films site. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): As a large lesbian site addition to Nubile Films, it's fine choice. The first posted videos, from August 2012, go from 270p through 1080p. The site started posting 4K videos in Oct 2020, so the 4K videos are a recent addition, and in the minority. But 1080p is more than good enough for most PU members, I believe. Especially since the site started off offering the 1080p definition way back in 2012. One of the strengths of the Girls Only Porn site is the level of attractiveness of the models: these girls are attractive to gorgeous: A quote from Rabbits Reviews on the Nubile Films site: "If you love beautiful all-natural teens, this collection of outstanding porn scenes will be like a wet dream come true." That quote applies equally to the Girls Only Porn site. CONS(START OF): -I believe the cons are minor. I really like the site. I prefer b-g action, but for a lesbian site, this is excellent. The videos are clear and crisp. They update with 1, 2 or 3 new videos per month. The update rate could be improved, made more standardized. But the models are cute to gorgeous. And the navigation is so easy, it's like a dream compared to the Adult Time network, which is a jumbled mess. BOTTOM LINE The main attraction is the access to Nubile Films, but the Girls Only Porn is a fine addition. There are two other bonus sites you get access to: Hot Crazy Mess and That Sitcom Show. That Sitcom Show is an archive site, last update was 2019-09-20. The site videos are parodies of TV shows. They are supposed to be funny, but I found the videos boring. The other bonus site is Hot Crazy Mess. That is also an archive site, with the last posted video on 2020-01-03. The models at Hot Crazy Mess are mainly cute to very attractive. And the videos are fine: It's a shame they stopped updating this site, because the site was much better than That Sitcom Show videos. Giving the Girls Only Porn a score of 90. Because the models are attractive young teens. Because the videos are crystal clear (all videos go up to 1080p, the last few months the videos go up to 4K). Easy navigation. Very good options for streaming and downloading. And because you get access to Nubile Films, which is an excellent porn site with outstanding models and professionally shot videos. 02-01-21  04:19am Replies (0) Review 160 Devils Film (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -You get a large number of videos in the Devils Film channel. I see 6,379 posted. A few days ago the posted number was 2,197 videos. My guess is they dumped a large number of older videos from other channels or sites into the Devils Film channel, just to increase the number posted. -Video download and streaming options for the last few years are 160p through 4K. The older videos go up to 720p or 1080p. -Secure login and member pages (https). -Excellent customer support from famesupport, which is 24/7 for live chat, telephone, and email. -Videos have both a trailer and full scene option. -Many videos have an accompanying photoset. -There is a text description of the video that summarizes the action. -There are different options for membership. The membership with streaming only is cheaper. Download privileges cost extra, or are included with a yearly membership. -Available with Chromecast and Roku. Cons: -Navigation is jumbled. Hard to find all the content at the channel, both to see what's there, and to access it. -There is a zip file for the photosets, but it's only in one definition. -The zip file for the photoset has a generic file name: e.g., 118203.zip. So you have to rename the file to include model names, channel, date posted, scene title. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: -Devils Film used to be part of the Fame Digital network, which included Peter North, Silvia Saint, and a bunch of other less well-known sites. But it's now part of the Adult Time network, which means you have access to over 55,000 hardcore videos, hundreds of channels covering a wide variety of niches, and 13,406 models. -That is both good and bad: Good-you now have access to a boatload of new hardcore content. Bad-navigation is nowhere as easy as it used to be, when Devils Film was treated as a separate site. They advertise that Devils Film channel at Adult Time has 6,379 videos. A few days earlier the posted number was 2,197 videos. I'm guessing they dumped a lot of older videos into the Devils Film channel from other sites. Searching for the Devils Film videos at Adult Time is a chore, and you need computer skills to filter out all the extraneous content from the other sites at Adult Time to find what used to be much easier to locate and access. The Adult Time thumbnails are larger than the old Devils Films thumbnails, so you can more easily see what the models look like. And the newer thumbnails are more attractive. Under the old Devils Film, your membership price was lower, and you could often find very nice bargains. You pay more for a Devils Film membership today, but you get access to the Adult Time network, so it balances out. But the Adult Time structure is a jumbled mess compared to the old Devils Films structure, where it was much easier to find and access the content. Video content for the Devils Film: latest posted number is 6,379 videos. -Older vidoes go from 160p through 720p or 1080p. Newer videos go up to 4K. Photosets have 100 to 200 or more photos per set. The videos at Devils Film are gonzo hardcore. Don't expect heartcore or slow, sensual action. Actually, watching these videos there aren't as gonzo as I remember from years ago: the videos often have a plot leading up to the sex. The plot is thin, the models and stunt cocks are supposed to be horny and ready to suck and fuck with little or no build-up. So if you are anti-plot or anti-buildup, and want to get to the "good stuff" without waiting, Devils Film fits the groove. Personally, I enjoy a build-up or some story line to make the sex more meaningful. I also like some sensual atmosphere where the stunt cock and the model kiss and snuggle or show some emotion of liking or love beyond scratching the horny itch. And that is lacking in the Devils Film videos: there is no tender emotion shown: it's two or more horny adults sucking and fucking. The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good sound control, good camera work. But I want more: when I was a teen, I could get a hard-on looking at Sears catalog photos of women in bikinis and underwear. But my body is less reactive today, and I need more than naked bodies slapping together: I need some meaning to the sex, a fantasy or eroticism, to make me react or to enjoy the photo or video. So many of the hardcore videos at Devils Film are boring, for me. Of course, that is a personal bias, and other PU members can have widely differing tastes. The physical beauty of the models at Devils Film has improved over the last few years. The models look less like hookers and more like women you want to bounce on. The models sport fewer tats and breast implants. I'm giving Devils Film a score of 95. That's because the channel has over 6,000 hardcore gonzo videos, plus complete access to the Adult Time network, which is probably the best bargain in hardcore porn on the internet: because of the massive amount of high quality hardcore porn for a very low price. The major problem with Devils Film and the Adult Time network is finding and accessing the content you enjoy. The navigation needs to be improved. 01-31-21  08:23am Replies (0) Review 161 Pure Taboo (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Probably the finest story-driven porn site on the internet. The plots center on twisted desires and the cinematography is crisp and dark. The darkness is to enhance the mood of the plot. One of the best channels in the Adult Time network. -Part of the Adult Time network. You get access to over 55,000 hardcore videos covering a wide range of niches. -There is a cheaper membership with streaming but no downloading privileges. For memberships with downloading privileges, there is a daily download limit of 300GB, which I feel is generous. -Probably the finest support of any site or network I've ever joined. famesupport.com is 24/7, with live chat, email, and telephone service. The live chat answers within a few minutes, the staff is courteous, helpful, informative. -Frequent daily updates. Adult Time network has 7 or more new videos per day, which is the most updates of any porn network I know. -If you have cookies enabled, login is automatic: you don't have to enter your login details. Cons: -Most cons are minor. This channel, and the Adult Time network, are probably one of the best bargains in porn today. The channel is a fine example of intelligent, twisted porn. The porn can be extreme, but if you accept the story line, the sex can be extremely erotic. It's not just two bodies slapping against each other, but meaningful sex, which adds heat to the action. The expensive sets and the excellent acting adds to the experience: watching the videos is like watching a short movie instead of viewing a normal porn video. And when I say the sex can be extreme, I don't mean physical gymnastics, but emotional intensity. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The network covers lesbian sex extremely well, but there is little to no male-male sex. -Due to the massive catalog of videos, and the 100s of channels included in Adult Time, navigating the sites can be a problem. They keep adding new videos and channels to the lineup, and it's difficult to see all the videos at any one site. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): -Some PU members have complained that some channels can have limited content, repetitious content, lower-grade content. That applies to the Adult Time network. But you can't please everyone. -Many videos are available in 288p through 1080p for streaming and download. Not all channels feature 4K definition. -There is a daily download limit of 300GB, but 300 GB is a big number. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Note: I throw in comments about the Adult Time network in this review. That's because Pure Taboo is included in the Adult Time network. Pure Taboo and the Adult Time network are both outstanding. Pure Taboo is the finest story-driving site on the internet. Adult Time is the best bargain for hardcore porn on the internet. Both statements can be questioned, but my review tries to show some of the value of both the Pure Taboo channel and the Adult Time network. First, Adult Time network. For a low or reasonable price, $95.40/year with a PU discount, even cheaper on some holiday sales, you get access to a massive collection of over 55,000 hardcore videos. Most of the videos are prime quality, and they cover a wide variety of niches. So for quality of content, quantity of content, you get low-priced access to a massive amount of porn. Second, Pure Taboo channel in the Adult Time network: The best story-driven porn in the network. Outstanding technical features for the video, clear, crisp images, (the videos use dark lighting to increase the atmospheric mood, but that's a deliberate choice), expensive sets, actual acting by the models and stunt cocks, which is a rarity in porn, combine to make the Pure Taboo channel a porn experience worth paying for. The main problem with the Adult Time network is that, because of the massive content, the massive number of channels, it can be difficult to navigate to find the content you want to see. 55,000+ videos is a huge number. 200+ channels. You get 13,406 models, many of them well-known starlets. A model listing, with large, well-sized thumbnails, helps, but boredom and lack of energy start to creep in when you thumb through the model listing. The mind is overwhelmed by the massive amount of models, number of videos, variety of videos, and you can't appreciate what you are seeing. So it's common to downgrade the Pure Taboo channel, and the Adult Time network, because it's too much of a good thing. I wish the Adult Time network, and the Pure Taboo channel, could be updated to make the content easier to navigate, to make the individual videos easier to find. That appears to be a massive task. Instead, the approach the operators are taking is to keep adding more videos, more channels and making the channels and network a jumbled mess. Less is more. You would appreciate the Pure Taboo channel, and the Adult Time network more, if they didn't keep updating with so much new material, that buries the older material. Having said that, the Adult Time network is like a gold mine of hardcore porn. You can get massive samples and small samples of many different sites: The 21 Sextury sites. The Peter North and Rocco Siffredi sites (which used to be separate sites in an older network, but are now channels in the Adult Time network), the GirlsWay network, now also included as an Adult Time channel. I don't believe that GirlsWay is a separate site any more: it's difficult to tell what is a separate site, with a channel in the Adult Time network, and what has been dropped as a separate site and merged into Adult Time network. As time goes by, many sites that used to exist before the Adult Time network concept was launched no longer exist as separate entities. But if you're new to porn, or even if you have many years of porn experience, the Adult Time network gives you samples of many different sites: For example, Vixen, Femjoy, Bare Maidens, Joymii, the list goes on and on. You could think of it as a low-cost introduction to these site, to see if they are worth joining. Human nature is funny. Too much of a good thing, and your appreciation dwindles. I'm not saying that people who dislike or criticize the Adult Time network, or Pure Taboo, are wrong: People are entitled to their own opinions. And if Adult Time or Pure Taboo does not provide you with a worthwhile experience, that is understandable in different ways. But for me, I think Adult Time is one of the best bargains in porn. And that Pure Taboo is the finest story driven channel on the internet. Giving Pure Taboo a score of 95. It's that good, in my opinion. 01-28-21  06:31pm Replies (0) Review 162 Family Swap (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network, which has 18 different sites you get access to. -If you join the site directly, the PU listed prices are: Monthly: $29.32 (recurring) 1 Year: $199.00 (recurring) Instead, if you join through the Nubiles Porn site (which includes the FamilySwap.xxx site), you get a PU discounted price of: Monthly: $19.98 (recurring) 1 Year: $99.95 (recurring) -The content is exclusive. -No streaming or download limits. Which is becoming rare, since many sites are either charging extra for downloads or limiting downloads. -Because it's a tiny site (14 videos currently), site navigation is easy. Even if the site grows, the site layout is professional, making it easy to find what you want. Your choice of streaming definition, from 270p through 4K. Download videos: 270p - 4K definition. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): There are matching photosets. The photosets are real photos. Up to 158 photos per set. You have zip files of each photoset in small, medium and large definition. You can select how the elements of a page are displayed: -You can link photos or thumbnails to the video -You can auto-size the photos. -You can set the number of thumbnails per page. -You can set the gallery photos to small, medium or large definition. Although normally you think of the site and network as a porn video site, the site is professionally set up as a video and photo site, with most of the same controls that you find at the MetArt and Femjoy sites. -Not only do you get a photoset of photos, but you get a smaller photoset of screencaps of each video. The screencap photoset has around 50 screencaps. Maybe the idea is to give you a screencap storage-saving file? Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): Call me spoiled. I collect MetArt galleries, MPL galleries. Also the galleries from Wow Girls, Wow Porn, etc. sites are worth collecting. But photos from FamilySwap.xxx are not worth collecting. The only photosets from the Nubiles Porn network that are worth collecting are some of the Nubiles.net photosets. CONS(START OF): These are some of the minor cons: -You have to know how to join to save money. If you join directly through FamilySwap.xxx, the prices are: $29.32/month $199.00/year PU has a discounted price for Nubiles Porn (which includes full access to FamilySwap.xxx): $19.98/month $99.95/year But if you wait for a holiday special, you can get a yearly membership to Nubiles Porn for $84, which is what I paid. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -CCBill is the default biller. A trusted name. But I prefer FameSupport, which has a 24/7 live chat option, as well as 24/7 email and telephone support. MetArt support is also first rate, except it doesn't have live chat. -When you log in to the site, the first page you see is an ad page for sites. That is both good and bad: bad, because you want to see the content you paid for; good, because the prices of some of these ad sites are tempting. Major cons: -Many of the sites in the network are archive sites, that stopped updating 1 or more years ago. -The plots at many of the sites are stupid. And the acting is poor. Instead of thinking of the videos as "reality porn", think of them as parodies. A change of mind makes you accept the action more easily, so you can focus on how attractive many of these models are, their young, tender bodies (the site and network is teen orientated), and erase the stunt cocks from the video and put yourself in their place. It makes a more arousing picture. -Tiny site. 14 videos currently. -Irregular update rate: you get 2 to 5 new videos per month. -Site started in September 2020. Based on the past history of the network, the site operators can stop updating any time soon, or keep a trickle of updates. BOTTOM LINE: -Stupid plots, and the poor acting, are a turn-off for me. The site theme is blended families have horny females (mainly daughters, but also their mothers or step-mothers), who are ready to fuck with little or no build-up. You see 2 women (a mother and a daughter), 2 men (a father and a son or step-son) solving a jigsaw puzzle for some quality family time. The boy is sneaking peeks at the older woman's breasts and ass. The man is sneaking peaks at the young girl's tits and ass. The young woman, out of the blue, snipes at the young man by saying he has a tiny dick. So the young man stands up, drops his pants, and shows his cock, to prove it's not tiny. The mother tells the father, "What are you laughing at, his dick is probably bigger then yours." So the father stands up, pulls his cock out, and says "Look at mine." This is how modern mixed families behave. This is a great example of why I think the videos should be viewed at parodies, instead of as reality porn. Because the next thing you see, the two women are kneeling on the floor, the two guys are shoving their cocks up the women's pussies. No romance. No build-up. No sense in what's happening, except this is a porn video, so let's get to the fucking already. The site layout, and the network layout, are done professionally, to make using the site and network easy to use. I wish they put more thought into making the videos more realistic. To add some build-up, some plot to make the sex more meaningful. More passionate. Instead, you have horny young men and horny older men jumping on young and slightly older women. What's supposed to add an element of heat is this is fake-incest, where the partners are related by marriage, but not by blood. Fake incest is a very popular niche, and there are some sites that do a good to great job with this niche. Pure Taboo is one of the finest plot-driven sites on the internet. Excellent technical production values, very good acting, if you want to watch fake incest, watch some of the Pure Taboo videos, which is a competing site. The structure/layout of FamilySwap.xxx is good to excellent, but the content is poor, because of the stupid plots and poor acting. Except I think the producers are doing this deliberately: this is the product they want: a parody of reality porn, that is supposed to be sexy. Except it's not sexy: it's stupid. The site is not to my taste. 01-28-21  01:03am Replies (0) Review 163 Bad Teens Punished (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network. An excellent network of quality porn (the models are, in the main, attractive to lovely, the technical features of the videos are very good, the site layout is easy to navigate). -PU has some nice discounts to the site and network. $19.94/month (recurring). Regular price $29.32/month. $99.95/year (recurring). Regular price $199.00. But if you wait for a holiday special, you can sometimes find lower prices. I joined for $84.00/year. -Nubiles.net is included in the network. Nubiles.net is one of the finest porn sites on the internet. The list of models is like an enclyclopedia of teen porn starlets, with close to 3,000 models listed. -Multiple payment options: credit card, paypal, checking account. -Content for the site and the network is exclusive. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -CCBill is the default biller, a trusted name. One feature I don't like about CCBill is that if you go to the CCBill website, it does not give you, on Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): a single page, all the subs you have through the biller. You have to open a separate web page for each sub you are looking for. -The technical features of the videos is excellent: Clear, crisp videos, good sound control, good lighting, nice sets. -Videos offered in 270p through 1080p. -Photosets offered in small, medium, large definition. -Unlimited streaming and downloads. CONS(START OF): -Although nubiles.net is included in the network, it's easy to miss that fact. Nubiles.net is the best site in the network, but it's not shown clearly as one of the sites included. If you click on the hot link that shows the sites included, it does list nubiles.net. But on the moving banner of sites included, it does not list the nubiles.net site, so you might miss the fact the nubiles.net site is included. And some reviews state that nubiles.net is a separate site, with no bonus sites included, which is an error. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): Note: I'm going into such detail that nubiles.net is part of the network you have access to, because the nubiles.net site is the most important site in the network you paid for. -The plot for the site (and many of included network sites) can be thin, repetitive, or unbelievable. After watching a few videos, some PU members have expressed boredom. The site (and the network) is not trying to make realistic videos: the focus is on finding attractive models, showing them nude, showing them having sex. And the models, in the main, are attractive to lovely. So forget how stupid the plots can be, and watch these beauties in action (You can turn off the sound and try to make your own dialogue, if that helps). The stunt cocks usually come across as jerks or creeps. Turn off your brain with a few beers or shots of alcohol, and you might enjoy the nubile models even more. -Archive site. Only one video added in 2019. None in 2020 or 2021. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Number of videos: 56 videos. Number of photosets: 56 (A matching photoset for each video). Number of photos per photoset: Approximately 88. The basic theme of the site is these cute girls are behaving badly, and the stepfathers need to teach the girls a lesson, with a few slaps on the ass, and then, realizing the girls are not only bad but horny, having sex with the girls. Silly plots, unbelievable acting, but the girls are 18 to early 20s, attractive, so turn off your brain and enjoy the action. The major con is the stupid plots. The poor acting. Except the acting is so poor, and plot so silly, it's more like a parody than straight sex videos. The other major con is this is an archive site, that basically stopped updating years ago. However, the models are cute, the videos are clear and crisp. So turn off your brain and enjoy the action. Giving the site a score of 82. You get the site, plus a network of 18 sites. And the nubiles.net site is a wonderful encyclopedia of teen porn starlets. 01-26-21  10:23pm Replies (0) Review 164 Full Porn Network (0) 69.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -PU lists the membership price at $59.95/month, with a PU discount of $39.99/month recurring. Or a 1 year membership for $119.88. I found a holiday discount of $59.95 for the first year. So if you want to join the network, or one of its sites, I suggest waiting for a holiday discount, since it's so much cheaper. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -The network includes about 20 different sites. The most famous one is JamesDeen.com, because James Deen has made a name for himself as a porn star. -There is a large amount of hardcore videos at the network. Some videos available in 4K, most are available in 1080p and lower definitions. -Content is exclusive. -If cookies are enabled, you don't have to enter your login details, you are automatically entered into the site once you click on the "login" link. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -Easy to use slide-show program for viewing photosets. -Photosets have 2 choices of definition for a zip file: 1024p and 1600p. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -Photoset default filename includes the model's name, title of the set, and file definition. CONS(START OF): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -Sometimes your login details fail to work. You have to try to get new login details, or play around with your old login details hoping it will get you into the network. -Rocketgate is the default biller. I think CCBill or Famesupport are easier to deal with. -I don't believe I got a confirming email on my membership. Which creates problems. Especially if the site does not recognize your login details. Rocketgate, the default biller, does not seem very responsive about confirming your membership, even though they were the biller I used to join, and I sent them my name, email address, the last four digits of my credit card I used to join, and the amount and date of my join. -The photosets are shot by a professional photographer: so the photos are real photos and not screencaps. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): The photos are well lit. But the photos fail to emphasize the physical beauty of the models (even when some of the models are naturally attractive). Riley Reid is attractive, but her photosets present her as a plain-looking girl. Chloe Cherry comes across a litte better. Chloe can be a fine-looking model, but I don't want to save any of her photosets: I want a model to be attractive, or seductive, or somebody I can fantasize about fucking. But the photosets of Chloe are not appealing. I'd rather look at photos of the meat hanging in a butcher's shop, which, while not sexual, can be interesting because I know the meat can be transformed into a delicious meal. Looking at Chloe's photos, I get turned off by her skin tones, by how un-attractive she appears. And that's for the good looking models, who are in the minority of models. The majority of the site models are plain to unattractive. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The network gives you access to about 20 different porn sites. The most famous site is JamesDeen.com, because he's made a name for himself as a porn star. There's some controvery about James Deen: he's been accused of abuse by some of his sex partners. Deen claims he's innocent and can't understand why women would complain about his rough treatment of them during sex. He's just a simple, innocent guy who enjoys slapping women, spitting on them, twisting their arms to make them moan, and showing sluts that he's the master who controls these cunts with his powerful cock. And he smiles a lot, which shows he's just a good old boy from Pasadena, California. The network features rough sex. A lot of anal sex. The models are usually called sluts, and treated as pieces of meat. Women are to be used and abused, because men are dominant creatures. The models are sluts: So you get lots of tattoos and implants. Even the cute models come across as trailer trash whores. I enjoy softcore and hardcore. But this network doesn't appeal to me. Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film, two competing sites, are much more interesting and enjoyable. For one thing, Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film features more attractive models. Some of the sex scenes at Rocco and Devils Film can be intriguing. And hot. Whereas the full porn network scenes focus on rough sex, anal sex, treating the women like pieces of meat. There is a channel called "Sex Games". It appears to be an adult animation channel, where you can play with cartoon figures and fap (masturbate). Edit: My mistake. The "Sex Games" link, although placed at the top of the page as a normal channel, is actually a separate site, and not part of the Full Porn Network. The reason I'm leaving it in this review is the "Sex Games" site appears to be very impressive. A lot of thought and skilled technical knowledge went into making the site. Joining that site is free. I recommend checking it out. Although free porn sites are not reviewed at the PU site, the free site seems intriguing. dirtyfapgame.com is the sex game site I have mentioned. I wish there were more hours in a day, because the questions they ask of your thoughts and desires, and the quality of the cartoon images, is just amazing at dirtyfapgame. I haven't joined the site yet, but I hope to join soon. Getting back to Full Porn Network: This is personal taste, but the vibe of the network does not appeal to me: I want young girls who look attractive, and seem to enjoy sex. The theme of the network is rough sex, anal sex, treating girls and women as sluts who should be abused, because men are dominant creatures, and girls are happiest when you spit on them, force them into painful and uncomfortable positions, slap them around, all in the nature of treating women as they secretly desire. So if you fantasize about rough sex, anal sex, then the network might be appealing. Especially if you can get a holiday special for around $60 for the first year. Otherwise, the PU discounts are OK, but way too high for my budget. 01-25-21  06:43am Replies (2) Review 165 James Deen (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: -Currently a special discounted price of $60 for the first year. Renews at $29.95/month. So be sure to cancel before your membership renews. Note: Be sure to join through the Full Porn Network site, which has the $60 for the first year discount. If you join through the James Deen site, or one of the other sites in the network, you will pay much higher prices, even with a PU discount. -Part of the Full Porn Network. You get access to 18 different sites. The James Deen site is probably the most famous site in the network. -Login and member pages are secure (https). -You get a new video every 3 or 4 days. -Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. Don't have to enter your login details. Just go to the site, and you are automatically logged in. -Login details are simple: your username is your email address. You can choose your password. -I'm not gay. But if I were gay, just looking at the colorful thumbnail of James Deen, with his wide-open smile, his (CONTINUED) Cons: bright blue eyes, his incredibly handsome face, and his slender body, would make me cream my pants. And his two-thumbs up gesture, showing how much he appreciates life, would be enough to give me a double orgasm. -The model listing has nice, oversized thumbnails of the models and stunt cocks. The only problem is there are so many ads on each page, that there is only room for 16 thumbnails per page, so you have to click through 56 pages to see all the models and stunt cocks at the James Deen site. That's a lot of clicking. CONS(START OF): -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -Site and network have plenty of ads. You get a page of ads when you first log in, before you get to the member's area. Then you have ads on every page in the member's area. -Because each page has so many ads (ads for sites included in the Full Porn Network and ads for other competing sites), there is very little room for thumbnails showing you the content from the James Deen site. (CONTINUED) Bottom Line: You have to click through a lot of pages to find the videos that belong to the James Deen site. I don't think I've ever seen a site with so many ads per page. -The thumbnails of the models (and stunt cocks) are not flattering to the models. Some of these models are attractive women at other sites, but not here. The site treats the models like meat, and makes no effort to portray them attractively. -The selection of models is porn star lite. Most of the models look like trailer trash, except that people living in trailers probably look cleaner and more attractive than the trailer-trash models at the James Deen site. I like my models to be young and pretty, and the model selection is a real turnoff for me. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The Full Porn Network covers the following niches: anal, fetish, trans, bdsm, rough sex, hardcore, role play, high definition, 4k UHD, romance, reality, teens, milf. The James Deen site videos feature rough sex. James Deen, the star of the site, has an amazing story. He started in porn in 2004 when he was 18. All he wanted to do was to have some fun. To meet some girls. By 2012-02-02 he had starred in over 4,000 porn videos, and was the youngest person to win the porn "Male Performer of the Year" award. What's so astounding is that, in spite of the massive female fanbase who adore him, he's just an "aw-shucks, regular guy", with curly brown hair and bright blue eyes who doesn't understand why he's so famous and lovable. "I have no idea," Deen said. "I really, really have no clue." I think of James Deen, growing up in a log cabin in Pasadena, an upscale community in Los Angeles County. He claims that he first became interested in porn when he was in kindergarten and found an old porn magazine. "I picked it up and I'm like, 'Oh my God, this is the cool, this is awesome,'" he said. "It was this weird moment that I will always remember where I was like, this is what I want to be when I grow up. I want to do this." This story reminds me of Abraham Lincoln, who also grew up poor in the backwoods of Kentucky, and yet he rose to become the 16th president of the United States. Deen is a humble man, just as Lincoln was. "I don't market myself at all, I really don't," Deen said. "I just kind of be me." And yet, they are both recognized as great men in their professions. Imagine, if you will, if Deen, instead of reading an old porn magazine when he was five years old, had, instead, read a copy of the US Constitution, that he might have become the son to President Donald Trump, and carried on his adopted father's political career. Deen might have even married Ivanka Trump, and founded his own political dynasty. Deen has the humbleness, the greatness, to make America great again. That is why I watch Deen's porn videos with bated breath: Deen is a younger version of Donald Trump. And with every thrust of his vibrant cock into the willing pussy or ass of his sex partners, he proves that women love to be abused and treated roughly. In 2015, several women, including his ex-girlfriend Stoya, said they were sexually abused by Deen. Stoya claimed that Deen raped her, and ignored her using the safe word telling him to stop. Deen denied all these allegations as defamatory. He says he respects women and their civil liberties. Deen, like Donald Trump, is a champion of women's rights. Although these attacks by women in 2015 might have destroyed Deen's porn career, he was able to deny all accusations of illegal conduct and claim he was baffled by the accusations. Basically, James Deen is an American porn superstar who loves women and treats them with the respect they deserve. Bottom line summary: What do you get at the James Deen site? Rough sex, where unattractive models are fucked up the pussy and ass, slapped and spit on, arms twisted behind their backs to make them moan in pain. Treating women like they should be treated, because men are the dominant creatures who enjoy abusing these cunts. James Deen is the master of bringing his artistic vision of women to the screen: And the women love him for it, as they moan and groan and gag on the thick cocks jammed down their throats. There is a disclaimer at the start of each video that states: "The performance you are about to watch is meant for entertainment purposed only. It should not be seen as a model for real-life sexual encounters. We recommend honest, clear, and ongoing communication with your partner(s) before any sexual encounter. All actors in this film are consenting adults who follow specific adult industry regulations. Please have fun, respect each other, and practice safer sex." The notice is legal boilerplate, that is meant to protect the site. It's a common joke that many models have been abused on site, with no attention paid to the boilerplate claims. The models in the videos are called sluts, whores, bitches. Because this is gonzo porn, and the models have to be treated with the respect they deserve. CONTINUED IN REPLY 11-29-20  12:14am Replies (1) Review 166 Teacher Fucks Teens (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 18 different sites with a membership in any one of the Nubiles Porn sites. -Login and member pages are secure. Https. -Unlimited streaming and downloads -Site (and network) is easy to navigate and use. -Excellent search engine. -Exclusive content. -PU has a discount price of $14.95/month (recurring). -Videos are availble for streaming and downloading in definitions from 270p through 1080p. Cons: -Small site. Only 36 videos. Very irregular updates. You get one video in a month, maybe the next video is one, two or nine months later. So even though the first posted video is Dec 20, 2015, the site is small and growing slowly. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -The female models are not attractive. Bottom Line: The site was launched in Dec 20, 2015. 36 videos. Runtime is 25 to 30+ minutes. The first 5 or 6 minutes is the models talking to each other. Which is supposed to be the setup. Then, suddenly, with almost no preparation, they're either stroking cocks, fondling breasts, or whatever else the script calls for, because these are horny models whose erotic lusts were just bubbling underneath their skins, and you couldn't see it until the sexual desire started to erupt. The site theme is teachers fucking their students. This is a common theme in porn. The twist for this site is that many of the teachers are female. And they are having sex with their male and female students. That twist is not enough to make this site exciting or memorable. The female teachers are often MILFs, women in their 30s who look like aging porn stars. Although the site describes the women as "stunners" or "oh so sexy", this is typical porn hype: the average teen or adult female you see at your local mall is more attractive. The Nubiles Porn network has a lot of attractive teen models, but the female models at this site are below average in looks. The site tries to add a story to the scene: the teacher either is tutoring a student at the teacher's home or at the student's home. So the video spends about 6 minutes where the teacher is supposedly tutoring a student, then the female teacher pulls out the student's cock, or the female student pulls out the teacher's cock, and we're off to the races. The plots are stupid and unbelievable. There's no build-up to the sex: we're just watching porn models (who aren't actors) recite a few lines, before the female starts stroking the stunt guy's cock and having sex. Contrast this with the Pure Taboo site, where the models have either been given some actor training, or they can naturally act, and the models create some tension and excitement before they have sex. Some of the Pure Taboo plots can be far out or unbelievable, but at least the Pure Taboo writers put some thought into the plots they write. Teachers Fuck Teens plots are trite, stupid, and unbelievable. And it doesn't help that the female models are unattractive. The Nubiles Porn network is a good network, but it has some clunky sites. Teachers Fuck Teens is one of the clunkers. This is my personal opinion. Some members post comments for each of the videos, and the member comments are often favorable. For example: "need more new movies of her.........lovely," or "she the best!" or "great scene." Which goes to show you that what I consider sub-standard porn can be considered gold porn by others. I'm giving the site a score of 75. The main positive about the site is that it gives you access to the Nubiles Porn network, which has some very fine sites. 11-24-20  08:28pm Replies (0) Review 167 Nubiles Casting (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -Part of the Nubiles porn network. One of the better networks on the internet. -You get 18 sites included with a membership to the Nubiles Porn network. You also get 5 pilot series/features that could be called sites. The pilot series are ideas that have anywhere from 4 to 12 episodes, that, if they continue to grow, could be called new sites: except, that most of the pilot series stop shooting after a few episodes, and some other new series is started. The 18 regular sites are listed below in the first reply to this review. -Unlimited streaming and downloadings. Note: I don't do a lot of downloading, so I haven't run into any limits. But sometimes a site will have download limits, and unless they express the limit clearly, I won't realize there is a limit. So be aware that when I say there are no download limits, I'm just going by my limited experience with downloads. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): -One of the main benefits of the site (and the network) is how attractive the models are. Most of the models are good-looking teens. -Login and member pages are secure: https. -All content is exclusive to the site and the network. -The technical features of the site are professional and excellent: Videos can be streamed in your choice of definiton: 270p through 1080p. -The videos can be streamed in your choice of playback speed: 0.25x through 2.0x. Videos can be downloaded in your choice of definiton: 270p through 1080p. Each video has an accompanying photoset. The photosets are real photos, below Metart standards, but worth collecting, especially since most of teen models are very attractive. The photosets average 120 - 200 photos per set. The average runtime for a video is 10 to 45 minutes. runtime grew longer as the site continued filming. -The videos (and photosets) come with plenty of tags, and an excellent search engine. -The video quality is crisp and clear. Bottom Line: CONS(start of): The main con is that this is a tiny site, and it stopped updating in 2015, two years after it was started in 2013. The site only has 67 videos total (with matching photosets for each video). BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The site theme is young girls being cast for the network. The casting agent is also a young girl. The vibe of the site is you are seeing a young girl acting as the casting director. She is not a hardened professional, but a young girl who seems new to porn, who is telling other young girls who are trying to break into porn to have sex with each other. And the casting director (Marissa Mei, is the first casting director), in addition to directing the girls how to put on a sex performance, also tends to get into the sex performance herself. So it's not heavy sex, but light sex, and even though it's a job where the models are getting paid to have sex, they are also trying to enjoy themselves and have some fun as well. And Marissa Mei also seems to be getting off on the girls she is directing. I wouldn't call this glamcore porn, but the models can be very attractive: They are chosen for their looks: Marisa Mei is an attractive teen, and Catie Parker, a model in the second scene shot at the site, is 20 years old, with a sweet, lovely face, a body to die for, and an air of innocence and joy, a girl you could bounce on all day long (if you had the vigor and endurance of a teenager). The MetArt site used to stand for Most Erotic Teens. Well, the Nubiles Casting site used most erotic teens to shoot their videos: these are seemingly sweet young girls who are exploring their sexual appetites, and doing it without any violence or pain or degradation: sweet, lovely sex with sweet young girls (and boys). So you get a mix of lesbian and boy-girl sex on display. The sex is not wild or over-the-top, but a friendly view of models and stunt cocks who are meeting for the first time, and having sex. The models appear to be young, at the start of their porn career. So you don't get the professional sex action that you find with most porn stars who've been doing this for years: instead, the action is mainly fresh, experimental (at least with the lesbian of two models appearing to put on a lesbian display). The appeal of the site is that you are like a voyeur who is watching young teens meet and have sex. It's hardcore porn, except it's like the fresh, innocent sex you would find in the teen exploitation movies from France in the 1970s or 1980s, where the sex could be tender young things first exploring the joys of sex. Sort of like the films of David Hamilton, who made Bilitis, Laura, and Tender Cousins. Except Hamilton's films were softcore porn. And the Nubiles Casting site is hardcore porn. For me, the main appeal is the young, fresh models: they are not hardened porn stars, but fresh young beauties, even if I've seen them at other sites (which I have). But at Nubiles Casting, they appear to be at the early beginnings of their porn career. If they started updating the site with new episodes, that would be great, because I thought this was one of the better sites in the network. A lot of the other sites in the network have really stupid plots, and the poor acting skills of the models make it worse. But for some reason, the site owners stopped updating Nubiles Casting in 2015, and this will remain a small, archive site. A list of the network sites you have access to is shown in the first reply to this review. 11-23-20  06:16am Replies (8) Review 168 21 Sextreme (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -21 Sextreme is a channel in the Adult Time network. You get access to the entire Adult Time network. -Large channel: 4,499 videos. -Actively updating: about 1 update per week(video + photoset). -Download options run from 160p through 4K(Ultra High Definition) on newer videos. Older videos run from 160p through 540p. -Very fast download speeds. I get around 20MB/s-24MB/s on average on my WiFi downloads. -Default filename for videos is excellent: It automatically gives you the title of the episode, the female models, the file definition: for example, SeductiveEncounter_s01_TiffanyTatum_TaraSpades_540p.mp4 -Excellent customer service. There is a live chat line, that is 24/7. Cons: -A lot of videos won't stream. Have to download to watch them. -Although this is supposed to be a channel featuring taboo sex, there is very little plot, and the taboos being broken are weak. For example, a twenty-something woman wants to have sex with her french tutor, who is older than her. So this is supposed to be dark sex. Or a teen female model wants to have sex with an older woman. Another example dark sex, which, in today's porn world, is very weak taboo-breaking. I mean, in the real world, it's somewhat common for older women to have younger women as lovers. -There seems to be a lot of hype in describing the models. For example, Alyssa Bounty is described as "a perfect beauty." You look at Alyssa Bounty, she's not ugly, but she's not a beauty: she is an average-type woman in looks. True, she has a nice slim body, but her face is just OK, nothing special. A lot of the teens you see at your local mall are more attractive than Alyssa Bounty. Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): On average, the models at 21 Sextreme are far below average in looks compared to any glamour site, and below average compared to the models at Teen Mega World. I don't know what it is, but even the cute models at the Adult Time network usually don't appear as attractive as they do at other networks: look at Evelina Darling, Foxy Di, Cherry Kiss, Angelika Grays, Anastasia Brokelyn or a bunch of other models at the Adult Time channels, and these models will usually appear to be much more attractive at competing porn sites. Maybe it's the makeup, the lighting, the photographic techniques, whatever, but unless you pick one of the glamour-type channels at Adult Time, like Vixen or Tushy, they often don't put a lot of effort into making the models as attractive as possible, even when the models have natural beauty. -Navigation is poor. The Adult Time has a massive amount of content, both videos and photosets. And 271 channels. Trying to find the videos that belong to each channel can be a chore. There's too much content to slog through, to find the videos for each channel. They need to update the site structure, to make finding the content at each channel easier to locate, and to access. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): 21 Sextreme Site theme: "The Darker Side Of 21 Sextury" Videos explore the dark side of taboo sex. Pure Taboo, a different channel on the Adult Time network, does a much better job exploring the dark side of sex: Pure Taboo is probably the finest site on the internet featuring taboo sex: fake incest, infidelity, lesbianism, etc. High production values, creative plots, some of the best acting by porn models you will find. Summary: I've been spoiled by the quality of the Pure Taboo channel. It's probably the finest story-driven dark erotic site on the internet. 21 Sextreme is not a bad site. It has a large amount of content (4,499 videos), the production values are professional (but they pale in comparison to the cinematic quality of the Pure Taboo videos), the 21 Sextreme videos lack the creative plot of the Pure Taboo videos. Comparing the two channels is like comparing a glass of fine wine to a glass of tap water: Pure Taboo is outstanding quality, 21 Sextreme is a OK site that pales in comparison. Many years ago the 21 Sextreme network (when it was a stand-alone network) used to give you access to over 20 sites covering a wide variety of niches, which were, at the time, hot and extreme. For example, it included a pee site, a zoliboy site, old-young lesbian sex, granny sex, old-man-young-girl-sex, fisting, and domination. They dropped some of the sites when the network was merged into the Adult Time network. I believe the 21 Sextreme network includes at least some of content of the these former sites: Dominated Girls Grandpas Fuck Teens Lusty Grandmas Mighty Mistress Old-Young Lesbian Love Teach Me Fisting Zoliboy However, since 21 Sextreme is now a channel in the Adult Time network, a membership in 21 Sextury network also gives you access to the entire Adult Time network, which includes 271 channels and 53,182 videos, which is a massive collection of hardcore porn covering a wide variety of niches. If you were a fan of the old 21 Sextreme network, you will probably miss some of the old content that was eliminated. However, that's the way things work in business: you often lose some content that people used to treasure, when sites merge, to increase efficiency in maintaining the current structure. I'm giving 21 Sextreme a score of 79. The site does not impress me much, and I do not spend much time at the site. I enjoy other channels in the Adult Time network more. For a site that emphasizes taboo sex, I recommend the Pure Taboo channel, which is the finest channel for story-driven taboo sex on the internet. 11-21-20  06:05pm Replies (0) Review 169 Fame Digital (0) 90.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: Note: Apparently Fame Digital still exists as a separate network. However, there is a Fame Digital channel on the Adult Time network that shows a video count of 17,967 videos. So I assume that much of the original Fame Digital content is duplicated at the Adult Time Fame Digital network. This review is based on the Fame Digital channel at Adult Time. For some channels at the Adult Time network, the channel can be a very limited version of the original site. But for other channels, the channel can be a very complete version of the original site. I believe that the Fame Digital channel of Adult Time is a very complete version of the original Fame Digital site. -As part of the Fame Digital channel at Adult Time, you get access to not only a large amount of Fame Digital content, but also get access to the rest of the Adult Time network. The Adult Time network has 53,182 videos, plus photosets illustrating these videos, plus 271 channels. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): Adult Time is now on Amazon Fire TV. So if you have a FireTV device, you can select, load and watch Adult Time channels on your TV. Adult Time is also available through Roku devices. Note: because Adult Time has so many channels, it's a great way to sample or enjoy the content of many porn sites, without paying for a subscription to those sites. -The login and member pages are secure (https). -Easy login. If you have cookies enabled, you open the Fame Digital channel, and you are automatically logged in to the member pages, without having to enter your login details. -Excellent support team, especially the live chat. CONS(START OF): -Most of the Fame Digital videos top out at 480p (even the videos posted in 2019). Which might be the main negative for most PU members. -Because of the huge amount of content, navigation can be difficult. What is the good of having great content, if you can't find the content you are looking for? Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED): For example, I put "Fame Digital" in the search box, and the page that opens shows me a jumbled mess of videos, porn stars, channels, movies, lastest updates, recommended scenes for you, favorite channels, recommended porn stars, recently watched, your favorite scenes, your favorite actors latest scenes, your favorite actors, coming soon. Keep it simple. Give me a listing of the videos (in chronological order) of the Fame Digital videos. Or a different set of pages showing the models at the Fame Digital channel (in alphabetical order). That way, I can browse the channel easily, in a way that makes sense. And it would be easier to find and access the content of the channel that I might enjoy. Otherwise, the channel has thousands of videos, but I don't know how to search through them, or what they are. -Another problem: This is a personal issue. I'm trying to find the videos that belong to the Fame Digital channel. But there are so many distracting thumbnails of attractive models and possibly-interesting videos from random channels that fill the pages while I'm searching, that I stop and look at this lovely model, or that maybe-good-scene, so my search for the Fame Digital videos gets interrupted time and again. Too much content, not laid out in a simple way. -Some of the Fame Digital channels haven't updated in one or more years: such as Peter North, Silvia Saint, and Tera Patrick. But Devils Film and Rocco Siffredi are still updating with new content, and even have 4K videos. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The membership options include streaming only (unlimited), and streaming + downloads (both unlimited). So make sure you choose to include downloads if that is important to you. The current plan at many sites is to charge extra for memberships that include downloading. -Keep an eye out for deals. You can find deals (especially during holidays, but also during made-up holidays, where they offer a discount and call it some "holiday special") where the discount can be significant. PU offers a discounted price of $95.40/year (recurring). That includes unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. But like I wrote, if you search, you can find lower prices at times. Bottom line(Start of): Fame Digital is mainly made up of the following sites: Devils Films Low Art Films Peter North Rocco Siffredi Silverstone DVD Silvia Saint Tera Patrick White Ghetto But you also get included some garbage gonzo sites. The Fame Digital channel (and network) is hardcore gonzo porn. I am speaking loosely. Using gonzo porn as a separate category from glamcore porn. But the distinctions between porn categories can get blurred: For example: softcore, hardcore, teen, MILF, cuckold, fake incest, group sex, virtual reality, inter-racial, anal, shemale, and other categories can also be mixed into gonzo and glamcore porn. Channel summary: Content quantity: huge, especially when you add in the access to the Adult Time network. Fame Digital channel has 17,808 videos. Adult Time network has 53,182 videos. Content quality: Some real gems, if you're able to plow through a huge amount of lower grade and medium grade content. Updates: The Adult Time network has the most updates per day of any network I've seen. Can range from 5 to 10+ daily updates. Navigation is poor. I'm giving the Fame Digital channel a score of 90. The main strengths are the huge amount of content, the wide variety of porn models (in age, body type). The support team is excellent. There is a live chat that answers within a few minutes, one of the best support teams I've ever used, even better than Metart, which I thought was one of the best. Navigation needs improvement, to make finding and accessing the content easier. If you want a smorgasbord of porn, or if your porn budget is limited, the Fame Digital channel (with its access to the Adult Time network) is a fine choice. You should get more than your money's worth. But if your tastes are more specialized, then there are plenty of other fine choices for your porn dollars. The internet has brought low-cost porn to the masses. 11-21-20  03:01am Replies (0) Review 170 Princess Cum (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month. -Multiple choices for payment: Credit card, paypal, checking account. -Multiple weekly updates for the network. -Unlimited downloads and streaming. -All content is exclusive. -Includes access to the Nubiles Porn network. -Login details work for all the sites you have access to (around 18 sites). -Videos are offered for streaming and downloads in definitions from 240p through 4K. -You can also stream the videos in 0.25x to 2.0x speed. (I don't know why you would want to change the speed, except maybe go to slow motion if you want to examine the "good" parts.) Cons: -Main con this is a tiny site. 42 videos total. -Update rate 1 or 2 videos per month. But the network has multiple weekly updates. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Bottom Line: Site theme: young girls (18 to early twenties) are porn star princesses. They demand attention from studs who are more than happy to fill their holes with cum. That might be too abrupt a description, because these girls are also taking care of their boyfriends needs. Number of site videos: 42 Number of photos per photoset: 70+ The photos in a photoset are real photos. They also have a smaller photoset of screencaps. Not sure what the reason for the screencaps is. The photoset of photos is good quality. Worth collecting, especially when the models are very attractive. Blake Blossom is the kind of step-sister I've always wanted: a caring, loving girl (actually a woman, she's 20 years old, but a lovely face and a body-to-die-for). When she finds her step-brother jerking off in bed, she explains that masturbating is not the way to happiness: you need to find a real girl. Her step-brother admits he admires Blake's boobs, and she's flattered. And she offers to help her step-brother because she really cares about him. So, first she shows him her boobs, then her ass. Only because she wants to help. Her boobs are large and firm, her ass is gorgeous. And the step-brother is unable to resist putting his cock into her pussy. Blake is angry at first, because she is only trying to help her step-brother stop masturbating, but then she decides his cock feels so good inside of her that it turns into a really good ride. So she and her step-brother end up really satisfied. Moral of the story: helping your step-brother can be a wonderful experience. These are the kind of stories that teach you about life. In living technicolor. With some good-looking cuties. As a side note: If you're going to masturbate, soft toilet paper and some hand cream are very helpful. But I'm not sure if doing it in bed is a good idea. I think sitting on a chair would make less of a mess. Just my thinking. But if your sister comes into the room, the bed is more comfortable than doing it on a chair. So maybe the bed is the right place, if your sister is going to help you out with your sex education. Bottom line: This is a small site with a slow update rate. But the videos are excellent: crystal clear, good color, and some of the models do a great job acting in what could be stupid plots: Blake Blossom has an expressive face, a voluptous body, and you just feel like she's really enjoying herself getting fucked by her step-brother. A real sweetie. The site needs a faster update rate. But the models are cute young girls, and they do a fine job with the silly plots. Some PU members might get annoyed because the plots are so simple, but turn off your brain and enjoy the lovely girls. Giving the site a score of 85. Because you get the site, plus access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network. If the simple plots turn you off, you would give the site a lower score. Also, the small number of videos hurts. But I just enjoy them, think they are funny. They put me in a good humor. Which is strange: because this is porn, supposed to be hot. But the videos are amusing to watch. 11-04-20  05:13am Replies (0) Review 171 Bitches Abroad (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -There is a hot link that allows you to skip the intro section when streaming a video. -Unlimited streaming. -There are plenty of attractive models. For example, Stacy Cruz, Julia Red, Zazie Skymm, Rebecca Black, Lovita Fate, Ria Sun, Misha Cross, Anna Rey, Jessica Spielberg, etc. -The videos are crystal clear. Good lighting, good sound control, good colors, etc. -The Zazie Skymm video at Bitches Abroad is worth the membership price by itself. She is one fantastic looking woman: lovely face, great body, alabaster skin: a wet dream come true. Cons: -There is a limit of 100 videos/month for downloads for the entire network (not per channel, but for the entire network). -Slow download speeds. Download speeds can drop to 400 KB/sec, so if you're downloading a 36 minute runtime video at 720p, it can easily take 30 minutes or more, which is ridiculous. -Videos download with the name of the model in the video, but you have to manually add the posting date, the channel, and whatever other information you need. -I don't know why, but the download links become inactive within a few minutes after logging in to the site. I need to hit the download link to download the video and photoset (if I want the photoset downloaded) immediately upon logging in, or I have to re-start the computer to download anything. -The channel logs you out within a short time. I've had other networks which left me logged in for hours, but this network logs me out in about 30 minutes (but logs me back in automatically, without having to enter my login details). Bottom Line: -Bitches Abroad is part of the Lets Doe It network. Membership in any one of the Lets Doe It channels gives you access to all the other channels in the Lets Doe It network. There are no premium channels you have to pay extra for. Note: A few years ago, when the Lets Doe It network was called Porn Doe Premium, it used to have 40+ channels. Then they renamed it as Lets Doe It, and reduced the number of channels to around 16 channels, and split the other channels into separate networks that you have to pay extra for. In that sense, what used to be a large network became separate networks that required a lot more money to access. So if you were a member in the old days, you might have a feeling of being cheated because you no longer have a low-cost membership that gives you access to all the channels in the PornDoe cash channels. The channel theme for Bitches Abroad is girls who are on vacation and travelling to a different country. And since this is a porn channel, the girls are horny and ready to fuck and suck with the first stud they meet. Not a lot of romance, just good old hardcore sex. However, since this is part of the Lets Doe It network, the girls are young (late teens, early twenties), and are attractive to fucking gorgeous. Bitches Abroad has 100 scenes. Runtime: 20 to 40 minutes. Video definition: 240p to 1080p. Unlimited streaming. 100 downloads per month for the entire network. The photosets are tiny: 13 photos or less per photoset. The photos in a photoset are actual photos, not screencaps, but since the photosets are a small number of photos, even if the girl is attractive, the photosets are not worth collecting. There is a zip file for each photoset, but only in 1 definition. This is definitely not a photography-oriented network. The major con is that this is an archive site. The last update was Aug 23, 2018, over 2 years ago. Which is a shame, because the models are attractive European women, and the vacation-travel idea adds a little spice to the sex. Two bodies slapping against each other tends to get tired after a while, even when one of the bodies is a good-looking women. The idea of a girl on vacation in a strange city, meeting a guy, then hooking up with the guy, makes the sex more interesting. Even if there is very little realism in the story: the girl is hot to trot, the guy is ready to fuck, and it's just wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am, but at least there's a tiny bit of plot that tries to give meaning to the sex. -What surprises me is that even the lower definition videos look very good. I downloaded some 480p videos, and to me, they look clear and crisp. I couldn't tell the difference between the 480p videos, and the same videos in 720p or 1080p on a 32" monitor. My laptop is rated for 1080p, and the 32" monitor is new, but the 480p videos really look crisp. Maybe on a super-high definition, large screen monitor the differences in definition would be more visible, but the 480p videos look fine to me. And the 480p videos save a lot of storage space over the higher definition videos. Actually, when I save photosets from MetArt or other fine photography sites, I normally download the small definition sets, because I can't tell the difference from the higher definition sets (the middle and highest definition sets) on my 27" or 32" monitors. Again, maybe it takes a very large, super-high definition monitor to see the difference. Or you might be able to see the difference in definition if you print the photos with a printer. But there's no sense for me to save the mid- or high-defintion photosets, because the low-definition photosets look just as crisp (when viewing as a slide-show, or a single photo. Only if I zoom in on a photo can I tell the difference between low, middle and high definiton photos. And I rarely zoom in on photos, because I'm not a professional photographer or professional artist, trying to see every detail on a photograph. My objective is to look at pretty women, not trying to study every tiny wrinkle or wart on the model's body. I'm giving the channel a score of 88. If they started updating the channel, the score would be higher. Lets Doe It network has a slow update rate, and Bitches Abroad is an archive channel. 11-03-20  10:42pm Replies (0) Review 172 Teens Analyzed (0) 69.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: Note: It looks like the Teens Analyzed site and the 18videoz did a very recent update. 18videoz now gives you access to 16 sites, instead of the 18 sites it gave you until recently. Teens Analyzed is no longer part of the 18videoz network. This probably happened in the last few weeks. The 18videoz site does not explain dropping the Teens Analyzed site from the network access. I don't know if I'm considered a member of the Teens Analyzed site. Until a few weeks ago, I was a member, through my membership in 18videosz network. PROS -Join through the 18videoz site for $60/year. If you join through the Teens Analyzed site, you are charged $120/year. Both sites, until recently, gave you access to the same network sites. I don't know if joining through Teens Analyzed gives you access to a few more sites or not, but in my opinion, paying a premium price for access to Teens Analyzed is not worth the extra money. -18videoz.com network now gives you access to 16 sites. Cons: PROS(continued): Until recently (within the last few weeks), you had access to 18 sites. -Low cost site. I got a 1-year membership for $60, which is the current price for 18videoz site/network. The current price for Teens Analyzed site (which includes the 18videoz network plus maybe a few more sites) is $120/year. -The site and network is teen hardcore. -Reality based porn. -Not a lot of plot build-up. A guy and girl might tell each other hi, and then it's time to fuck. So no romance or build-up. -Same login details work for all sites in the network you have access to. -Video definition is mobile through 1080p. -Site has 286 videos. -The network gives you access to 3,278 videos. -The content is mainly exclusive. I've only seen one video at the network that appears at competing networks. -Customer support is Vendo. Which has a responsive live chat that is 24/7. -Epoch is the primary biller. One of the trusted names. -Unlimited downloads. Bottom Line: CONS(START OF): -They have changed the structure of the Teens Analyzed site. So I'm still unsure of how to navigate the site. I haven't found the link to streaming videos. Maybe they will add streaming later, but for now, it appears to be dropped. So it's much easier to download a video and watch it on my PC. -Archive site. They advertise 2 updates per week, but the last update was November 13, 2018. -Login and member pages are not secure. You get a popup warning from your browser that login details are open to hacking. -Username and password are computer generated. Impossible to remember. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -A wide range of model attractiveness: there are some really cute girls, but little effort is made to present the models attractively. Except that many of the girls are really cute, and they don't need make-up or special costumes for their young beauty to shine through. -Once in a while, you hit the login page link, and get the error message: 502 Bad Gateway. -This is not a con of the search: but if you put in a model's name, you can find many models share the same name, so you have to check the thumbnails to see which model you are looking for. -Default filename for videos is "fulllength-high.wmv", so you have to manually rename the files to show the model name, site name, etc. -Once in a while your login details do not work. I assume the reason is the site is forcing members to reset their password for security purposes, instead of the password being hacked. I've had to re-set my password a few times every few months, because the old password stopped working. -I think they updated the public page for the site. They now advertise that the network has 28 sites. However, if you count the number of sites listed, it's now 16 sites for the 18Videoz network. And the number of sites for the Teens Analyzed site is hard to determine. They also advertise that new sites are coming, but I put little faith in that claim. -The coding for the videos is not efficient. A video file in 1080p with a runtime of 28 minutes 33 seconds takes 1.23 GB storage space. The video total bitrate is 6192kbps with a framerate of 25.00 frames/second. BOTTOM LINE -Site theme: First anal sex makes these teenies scream of painful pleasure. That is the theme, but I doubt any of these girls are having anal sex for the first time. Video runtime is usually 20 to 30 minutes. Video definition goes from mobile to 1080p. That is for all the videos, even the earliest ones from 2012. Maybe I was being too harsh when I said that there is no setup to the sex. For example, one video shows a teen coughing, she calls a doctor, who shows up wearing a mask (and this was in 2012, before the Covid epidemic). He takes her temp, looks in her mouth, touches her throat, she starts stroking his arm (I guess it's different in Eastern Europe: if a doctor touches your throat, the correct response is to stroke the doctor's arm), she starts to giggle, and touches his shoulder, then starts stroking his groin (he's still wearing his doctor's clothes), then she takes off the doctor's mask, so he can suck and lick her titties, and it's time for the good old blowjob-vaginal-anal-intercourse routine. I'm moving to Europe, where I can find some of these good-looking horny Russian babes. I still think there is little build-up to the sex, unless you count a minute or two of a guy and girl looking at each other before the sex begins. Actually, I'm surprised the quality of the videos is as good as it is. Many of the videos have professional camera-work (good focus, no jiggles from the camera), good lighting, an OK to a nice setting. But the main attraction is the level of attractiveness of the young, teenage models: you have some real cuties here, that you will have seen at many other sites: mainly Eastern European teen models. Teens Analyzed is one of the better sites in what used to be the 18Videoz network. But I don't think the Teens Analyzed site is still considered part of the 18Videoz network, because it's not listed in the current listing of 18Videoz sites. I'm giving the Teens Analyzed site a score of 69. That is very subjective. The main objection is the membership price: $120/year is way too high. This is an archive site. That stopped updating 2 years ago. There are other cons: For one, I think Teens Analyzed is no longer part of the 18Videoz network). Another problem: they seem to have dropped the option to stream videos. Another problem: the structure of the Teens Analyzed site is buggy: For example, the link "Bonuses" brings up a page that states "There are no such bonus There are no such bonus". I think they are working on the structure of the site, and there are bugs that need to be fixed. The streaming option seems to have disappeared. The model listing seems to have disappeared. I would not pay the premium membership to join this site. 11-02-20  02:41am Replies (0) Review 173 Wow Girls (0) 94.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -If you join any one of the three sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, or Wow Porn, you get access to all 3 sites. -They've had a sale price for months now. $29.95 for 2-months membership, unlimited streaming and downloading. Or 1-year membership for $89.95 (recurring). -The major attraction of the 3 sites is how attractive the models are. These teen girls are some of the most attractive models on the internet. -Navigation is basically simple. You can search through the model listing (alphabetical or by popularity or latest addition). Or you can search by video or photoset (same listing system). -There's a huge amount of content at the 3 sites. Both videos and photosets. -The technical qualifications of the content is excellent. This is borderline glamcore. It's hardcore action, but not rough or over-the-top sex, not a lot of heartcore: mainly, it's girls getting off. By themselves (masturbation), with one or more other girls (lesbian), or with b/g, b/gg, or a few boys with girls. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): But the sex is straight blowjob, pussy sucking, vaginal and anal fucking. -The models are naturally attractive teens. Very few boob jobs. Not a lot of tattoos or piercings. This is not a glamour site, the models don't wear fancy costumes, but the sets are nice and clean, whether indoors or outdoors, the stunt cocks are mainly attractive young male teens. -The 3 sites have had 4K for years now. And they've started to remaster some of the videos to 6K resolution, for people who have very high resolution monitors. My monitors max out at 1080p, and I normally watch and download at 720p (to save storage space, and because my older eyes can't tell the difference of higher definition videos anyway). -You can download videos in your choice of definition from 480p through 4K. Some videos have been remastered to 6K. -You can download the entire video, or can download selected parts of the video. -You can download the photosets in your choice of zip definition. Bottom Line: PROS(CONTINUED): -Update rate is 1 video or photoset per day (that's for the 3 sites, not each site separately). -The customer support is excellent, one of the finest I've ever dealt with. They have a live chat that is 24/7, that answers within a few minutes. CONS(START OF): -I think the cons are basically minor. The 3 sites, or any one of them, are among the finest hardcore teen sites on the internet. Lovely models, fine technical quality of the videos and photosets, girls who put on a fine show of enjoying their bodies. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. -The 3 sites do have some non-exclusive content. Teen Mega World (another fine teen hardcore network) and Team Skeet have a lot of the massage videos that are posted at the Wow sites. And some other content at the Wow sites is also duplicated at Teen Mega World and 18XGirls. (18XGirls site has died, I believe.) -Rarely, download speeds might be slow. I've had almost no problems with download speeds at their sites. But also, I don't download a lot any more, so I'm not the best expert on download speeds. BOTTOM LINE(START OF): The site theme is teen girls enjoying sex. The girls are lovely. The sex is hardcore, but it's not extreme, no domination, no BDSM. Although the girls don't wear glamour costumes, and the sets are not glamourous, the sets are clean and the videos and photosets are clear and crisp and showcase these lovely girls very well. Not a lot of makeup or glamor, but the girls are so young and naturally attractive that it's a pleasure to watch them in action. And to study those lovely bodies. There is no blog (eliminated years ago), where members can ask questions and share talk. There is a glitch in the navigation, where if you hit the backspace button at a member page, instead of going back one page, you instead bring up the login page. But these are all minor glitches. The site (and 2 other sites you get with a membership) is one of the finest teen hardcore sites available. I recommend the site highly, and give it a score of 94. The models are just so fine. 10-07-20  07:25am Replies (0) Review 174 Detention Girls (0) 72.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: -PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month (recurring). -Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 18 different sites. -The site and the network are first class. First class in videos and photosets in technical features. -Unlimited streaming and downloading. -All content is exclusive. -Navigation is simple. Can easily change between sites. No additional re-login required. -There are free cam shows included. -Excellent model listing, with large thumbnail for each model. -No download or streaming limits that I found. -There is a simple search and an advance search. The advanced search has lots of different filters you can use. -The quality of the photosets is excellent. -Photosets have plenty of tags to describe the action. -Videos can be streamed or downloaded in multiple definitions: 270p - 1080p. -Photosets can be downloaded in small, medium and large definition zips (800px, 1333px, 3840px). -This is a teen site and teen network. The models are A-list, very attractive. Cons: -The major con is this is a small site (19 videos and matching photosets). And it's an archive site. The last update was Apr 26, 2020. I guess the Covid epidemic shut down production. That is a shame, because the videos and photosets are high quality, with attractive teen models. -You get basic model information: girl's age, height, country, figure (e.g., 30B-24-33), and a fake bio that bullshit. For example, the bio for Vanna Bardot reads: "Vanna Bardot is a playful teen who loves toys, boys, and anything else that'll make her tight little pussy throb. Her puffy nipples are a perfect mouthful and her braces-filled smile is the epitome of innocence. You will love this tanned toned hottie!" The bio is obviously fake: Vanna Bardot does not have braces. I don't know where they get the idea of innocence from, because in every video I've seen at the site and network, she's hot to trot. My guess is they make up the bios without examining any of the site videos. -No 4K video definition. Bottom Line: The site theme is teen girls who are being punished by being sent to a detention center. That's the idea, but the videos and photosets only show a slight hint that the girls are at a detention center. They might sometimes wear an orange outfit, but that's about it. But the girls also wear tiny cut-off jeans, with g-string underwear, crop-top halters, for variety. The holding cell for a girl is a large-sized bedroom, with a king-sized bed and the bedroom looks more like a nice motel room than a prison cell. You see framed photographs on the walls, nice nightstands with table lamps on either side of the bed, carpeted floors, an adjoining, individual bathroom with a toilet, large mirror, washbasin, and shower. Instead of bars, you have a doorway leading out of the bedroom that is not locked. I guess the girls are supposed to be at high-class detention centers. The only way to tell this is supposed to be a detention center is the site title, and the orange uniform some of the girls put on some of the time. Some of the girls even have a pink teddy bear on their bed. The sex is guy/girl, girl/girl, group with two or more girls, group with two or more girls with a guy, whatever. The guards don't wear prison type clothes, but regular street clothes. How do you know they are guards? Because they tell the girls the girls are being bad. The girls are so horny they want to fuck. And the guards are willing to fuck the girls, after the girls plead to be fucked. Or else, the girls try to get satisfaction with other girls (lesbian action). In other words, the plots are basic or non-existent. "I'm horny, fuck me," says an attractive girl. "No, don't be stupid," says the guard. "Please, I want you," says the girl. "Well, all right," says the guard. And they have sex. Before the girl has sex with the guard, she might have sex with her pink teddy bear (to show you how horny she is). Neither the script or the model has been nomimated for an academy award, or even for a Porn Star award, as far as I can tell. I'm giving the site a score of 72. The girls are attractive, the videos and photosets are good to excellent quality, the technical features of the site are fine. The problem is this is a small archive site with limited content. However, you get access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network, which is 18 teen sites in all. The technical features of the network are excellent. But problem with the network is that the themes are "reality-based porn" that is so simple it's stupid. Instead of calling this "reality porn", I would say it's really a 12-year-old male's fantasy of what porn girls are like: attractive young girls who just want to have sex. There is no extreme, hardcore porn action, no domination or BDSM, just clean sex with horny young girls who want to be satisfied. 10-07-20  05:28am Replies (0) Review 175 Peter North (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: INTRODUCTION: This review is based on the Peter North channel of the Adult Time network. If you subscribe to the Adult Time network, you get the Peter North channel. If subscribe directly to the Peter North site, you are supposed to get access to the Adult Time network. One problem: sometimes, when you join a site, you don't get everything that is advertised. It happens, and it can be frustrating. A different problem: the Adult Time channel for a site can be very different from a subscription to the original site. The Adult Time channel might be a condensed version of the original site, with fewer videos, fewer photos in a photoset, less definition options for streaming or downloading videos and photosets, and other differences. PROS(START OF): -Peter North is a legend in the porn industry. Famous for his stamina and cum shots. -The Peter North channel lists 3336 videos for the Peter North channel. So there is plenty of content at the channel. Cons: PROS(CONTINUED): With access the Adult Time network, you are supposed to get 8 video updates per day, which is a huge amount of updates. -There is often a brief setup to the sex, but it's very minimal. Most of the video is straight, hardcore sucking, fucking, etc. CONS(START OF): -The Peter North channel (and site) stopped updating around May 2018. Even before the updates stopped, Peter North himself was becoming less active in front of the camera. -Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. -The earliest videos start around December 2006, and are only available in 240p and 480p. Even some videos posted in 2018 can have a max definition of 480p. But other videos posted in 2018 can have a max definition of 1080p. -The models are mainly white. Ages range from late teens to around 30. A lot of the models have breast implants. Plenty of tattoos. Older videos max out at 480p, and the technical features can be poor: -Any glamour site has better-looking models. Bottom Line: These options relate to a sub to the Peter North site: These options can change very fast. So check what the options are, before you choose your membership plan: Streaming only - 3 Days period. $1.00 charge. Streaming only - 30 Days period. $14.95/month. Streaming + downloads - 30 days period. $24.95/month. Streaming + downloads - 365 days period. $95.40/year. -They advertise the following: Access to over 25 sites 18,000+ Scenes Multiple Daily Updates Unlimited Streaming & Downloads Peter North is part of what used to be called the Fame Digital network. Which used to be a separate network of 20+ sites. The Fame Digital network became part of the Adult Time network in 2018. As part of the Adult Time network, you have access to over 250 channels, over 52,000 videos, and 8 updates daily. I don't know why they advertise that when you join Peter North, you get access to 18,000+ scenes: You are supposed to get access to the Adult Time network, which has over 52,000 videos. Maybe it's a case of copywriters covering a single niche, without knowing what the overall picture: the overall picture is that when you join Peter North, you are supposed to get access to the entire Adult Time network, not just access to the old network that Peter North was part of. I get access to the Adult Time network because I joined through 21 Sextury. 21 Sextury is a network that used to include over 20 separate sites. But in 1998, 21 Sextury was folded into the Adult Time network. Late in 1998, joining 21 Sextury sometimes gave you access to the Adult Time network (on a random basis). Then, early 1999, joining 21 Sextury gave everyone access to the Adult Time network. (That was the theory, and what was advertised. But one PU member who joined 21 Sextury back then, and saw it advertised that he would get access to Adult Time, did not get access to Adult Time. This was one of those times when a network promised something, and did not follow through with its promise.) But this is now October 2020, and I assume that almost all members who join a site that advertises access to Adult Time get access. The main point is: Access to the Adult Time network is usually the main value of joining any sub-network in the Adult Time network. I think Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film have hotter videos than the Peter North videos. I rate Peter North below Rocco Siffredi and Devils film. Peter North videos just seem like lower-quality videos, less inspired videos, than the Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film videos. That's my opinion, anyway. I'm giving the Peter North channel a score of 79. The main advantage of the Peter North channel is that it gives you access to the Adult Time network, which has a huge catalog of very good hardcore videos that cover a wide range of niches. Note: I reviewed the Peter North channel in 04-17-19 and gave it a score of 95. The high score was because I was really rating the Adult Time network access, which I thought was one of the best bargains in porn. Today's review focuses more on the Peter North channel, which is one of the poorer choices in the Adult Time network. That's why my score dropped so dramatically. Also, I was just getting used to the Adult Time network, and was impressed. Since then, I am still impressed by the Adult Time network, but would drop my score for the Adult Time network to maybe 90+. 10-06-20  09:16pm Replies (0) Shown : 151-175 of 247 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.35 seconds.