Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
176
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU has a discount of $19.99/month recurring. However, look for holiday specials where the price can drop to $10 for the first month, or even lower. As a member of the MetArt network, I found an offer for $4.99 for the first month, rebilling monthly at $19.99.
-Customer service is 24/7. One of the best customer services for any porn site. The only one better is the fame aid customer service, which has a live chat line that is 24/7, and answers questions within minutes. The MetArt customer service usually answers questions within a few hours, by email.
-The content is exclusive. Note: Staff Selections are exclusive to the MetArt network, but not to any one site in the network. Staff Selections are a premium item that has to be purchased separate from your regular membership.
-The models are mainly white, Eastern European. Most of the models are familiar from the other MetArt network sites. The models range from attractive to lovely. This is one of the strengths of the MetArt network: |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
how attractive the models are: however, the competing sites, like MPL Studios, Femjoy, Watch4Beauty and other fine photo sites also have a strong catalog of lovely models.
-On the initial signup to any of the sites in the MetArt network, you are offered a chance to sign up to different sites in the network for $19/month, $90/year, $400 for a lifetime membership.
If you are a real fan of one of the sites, one of those offers might be worth considering.
However:
-On a personal level, a lifetime membership is not worthwhile for me. On a realistic basis, since my health is not good, and I'm over 70, even $400 is not a worthwhile investment. I do have a lifetime membership to MetArt and a couple of other MetArt sites, that I paid for years ago.
If you're much younger, and you really enjoy one of these sites, a lifetime membership for $400 might be worth considering. Especially to MetArt, which has a massive catalog of photosets, a daily update rate of 4 sets, |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
plus 6 sets on the first day of each month. MetArt, because of the massive catalog of photosets (and a large collection of videos, most of those videos are boring, in spite of how attractive the model might be), the large update rate, the fine technical features of the site (offering zip files in 3 definitions for each gallery, a good photoplayer to watch a gallery online, 24/7 excellent customer service, clean navigation, etc.) is the best site in the MetArt network. However, it's a softcore glamour site, emphasizing photos, which might be too bland, not hard-core enough for some PU members.
There was an announcement at the MetArt network:
30 Apr, 2020
Attention Lifetime Members, we have retroactively upgraded your lifetime membership to grant you full access to all Staff Selections.
If you carry a lifetime membership, you can now stream or download all past and future Staff Selections.
I'm a lifetime member to MetArt, SexArt, and The Life Erotic.
However, on a practical basis, access to Staff Selections doesn't hold a lot of value for me.
I don't think the Staff Selections are rare jewels compared to the normal updates at these sites.
That's my opinion, anyway.
I never paid to view or download any previous staff selections.
And I think the staff selections are basically hype, which I don't buy into.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. The last time I joined (about 1 year ago) they didn't have a pre-checked cross-sale, but this time they did. Pre-checked cross-sales are common for the porn industry, but I believe they are a poor marketing gimmick. If you miss the cross-sale notice, you will be signed up to a short term trial that can turn into a very expensive monthly membership unless you cancel the trial almost immediately.
-Also I unchecked the remember me box. This allows the site to keep your credit card data. Too many sites have been hacked for financial information. So it's a bad idea to leave your credit card information at too many sites, because you are just increasing the chances your credit cards will be hacked. I've had several credit cards accounts hacked over the years, with charges made to the accounts from fraudsters. Some charges were made from Africa, some from states in the United States I've never visited. I've never been to Africa. Credit card fraud it pervasive. Try to reduce the places that keep your credit card details.
-I got a confirming email on signup. This was important.
The confirming email was poor.
It confirmed that my account was active with Errotica Archives.
The confirming email did not show the membership price for the first month, or the montly rebill price.
The email did not name the biller for the transaction.
The signup page showed "ECHST.NET 866-452-5108".
From Google, ECHST.NET is a payment processor.
However, the member page at the Errotica-Archives site states my payment processor is RocketGate.
CCBill and Epoch are the gold standards of payment processors.
It would have been nice if I had been able to choose the payment processor.
The member page at the Errotica-Archives site does not show the monthly membership price, either the first or succeeding months.
Separately, the confirming email was important:
On the join page when signing up, you enter a password for your membership.
The password for my membership on the confirming email was a different password.
That is the first time that's ever happened to me, in over 100 porn memberships, over 20 years of porn memberships. That I was given a different password from the site, instead of the password that I entered. (The password that I entered met the stated password requirements of the site.)
You might think some of the cons are trivial. But if I hadn't gotten the confirming email, I would have had to contact customer service to try to enter the site.
And it would have been nice for the confirming email to show the last 4 digits of the credit card I used.
Along with the first and continuing monthly membership price.
-They advertise daily updates. The average update rate has been 2 updates per week for a year or more.
-Regional discrimination. PU members (outside the US) have complained that the site charges more for a membership than US members are charged. I don't know if this is due to the site or the payment processor.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Models: 806.
Galleries: 4,510
Number of photos per gallery: 50 - 100.
Contributing photographers: 73.
Photosets have a zip for low, medium and high definition.
Films: 652
This is basically a photography site. The last video update was around June 2018.
That does not include the "staff selections". They tell you if you buy a staff selection, you "own" it. But that is a marketing ploy.
There is no DRM for MetArt network sites. So you "own" all the videos and photosets at the network (except for the "staff selections").
CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: |
|
09-24-20 10:10pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
177
|
TMW VR Net
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-$14.95/month discount offered by PU.
-TmwVRnet is part of the TMW (Teen Mega World) network.
With membership in any one of the sites, you get acccess to the entire network.
There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The TmwVRnet has 7 or 8 updates per month. That is the most updates, by far, of any actively updating site in the network. By update, I mean both a video and the accompanying photoset of the shoot.
-They upgraded the search engine for the site (and network). Now, when you put in a model's name in the search box, it returns her content at the network. Before, the search results were a jumbled mess, returning the model's content plus a slew of un-related content that had nothing to do with the model.
So the search function is very useful now.
-There is an excellent alphabetical listing of the models. With nice-sized thumbnails of the models that give you a clear picture of what the models look like. However, you have around 1,500 models at the network, |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
so searching through the model index would take a huge amount of time and patience. The model list is for the network. There is no model listing for each separate site.
-The models are late teens through the early 20s. Mainly white, Eastern European girls. Most speak Russian or some Eastern European language. Most of the models range from cute or attractive to very attractive.
-The posting date of the videos and photosets are displayed, so you know when the video and photoset was added.
-Navigation is simple. Both for the site and network. Can easily change between sites, without having to re-login. The model's page lists her contents at the entire network, not just for a single site.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. A nice feature, when many sites are starting to charge extra for downloads, or limiting the amount of downloads.
-The network offers up to 5K (2700p) videos
-Zip for each photoset. But they are not worth collecting, because the quality is poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
First, the photos are screencaps, and I've seen much better screen caps made from software at other porn sites. I'd guess that's partially because they were shooting for a VR video, and the software couldn't compensate for the difference from a normal film shoot. But also, the software they are using to create the photosets is not as good as the software some other porn sites are using to create photosets, because the photosets from other sites in the network is below the quality of photosets at some competing networks, especially the Wow sites. And far below the quality of the photosets at X-Art, which are probably photographs, not screen shots.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The photosets are screenshots made from some software program. The screenshots are just OK, better than the screenshots from years ago which were low-quality screenshots that were easy to recognize as screen shots. The screen shots for the last several years are better quality, but nowhere near a phtographic quality of even the lowest quality photos at photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios.
-Although the models mainly range from attractive to very attractive, there is not a wide range in age or body type or race: these are mainly white Eastern European girls of teens or early twenties. No milfs, very few Asians, Blacks or Latinos.
-Minimal information about a model is given. A model's page lists her debut age (for her first content at the network.) And that's it--except for some made-up bullshit about the model. Playboy and Penthouse back in the 1970s and 1980s made up better sounding bullshit about their centerfold models that was more believable.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Number of videos: 398
Number of photosets: 398 (photoset is made of screencaps from the video).
Number of photos per photoset: about 100
Video runtime: about 20-30 minutes.
Download choices for a sample video at the TmwVRnet site: type of file approximate file size
Oculus/Vive 3840x1920p 2.39 GB
Gear VR 2880x1440p 1.2 GB
PSVR 2880x1440p 1.03 GB
Smartphone 1920x960p 1.2 GB
MP4 1080p 588 MB
5K 5400x2700p 2.41 GB
MP4 480p 166.69 MB
For the network, on the videos posted for the last few years, I see downloads listed at 360p through 2160p (UHD).
The network started offering 1080p videos in May 2014.
Before that, the highest definition was 720p.
Videos range from 360p through the highest definition.
The network advertises that it offers 5K videos (2700p).
But I haven't found the links that downloads 5K video definition.
However, my computer equipment can only handle up to 1080p definition.
Also, since I have limited drive storage space, I normally download videos in 720p, which saves me storage space and gives me good visuals on any videos I watch.
TmwVRnet is the Virtual Reality site of the TMW network.
I don't have Virtual Reality equipment, so I can't comment on the effectiveness of the VR effect.
You can watch the videos without VR equipment, although there is a slight 3-D effect when watching a VR video at the site. Because the video was meant to be viewed as a VR video.
Actually, since I don't have VR equipment, when watching these videos, I get eye-strain. Not only does the video have a strange 3-D effect, but I start to get a headache from watching these videos.
So I'm not the primary target for these videos.
And I can't speak for how effective the VR effects are.
Unless you have VR equipment, I would guess the site has little appeal.
I'm basing that on my reaction of eye-strain from watching a few of these VR videos (in non-VR format).
Not only do these VR videos have a strange 3-D effect, but the videos give me a headache.
TMW also has live chat shows. I'm not into chat, but there appear to be over 90 live chat shows on their chat channel, which you can watch for free, or tip if you want. I don't know how they can have so many different chat shows live at the same time.
Out of the 90 live chat shows on the first page, you have:
-Most live chats are single female models
-3 chats are a single male model
-2 chats are 2 male models
-a few male-female model chats
-even fewer with a female model with 2 or more guys
-also a few with more than 1 female model and more than 1 guy
CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW: |
|
09-22-20 09:09am
Replies (9)
|
Review
178
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Good sized site. 181 scenes.
-High quality production standards: extensive attention to making the models as lovely as possible, expensive sets, crystal-clear videos, good sound control.
-Unlimited streaming. But limited to 100 videos per month for downloads.
-You can watch videos streaming in 240p through 1080p.
-You can download videos in 240p through 1080p (but 100 video downloads per month).
-You can hit the "Skip" link to skip the introduction to a video. |
| Cons: |
-A few PU members have complained about slow download speeds from the site and network.
-Several PU members have complained about the 100 video/month download limit.
-At least one PU member has complained that download managers don't work well with the site or network.
You can't que up several videos and expect them to download correctly.
-Lack of variety of models: some PU members complain girls look like glamour models, too white, too slender, not enough ethnic variety or enough body types.
Note: You can't please everyone. The site (and most of the network) features attractive to lovely models, made to look gorgeous. So some people want a more natural style, where the models don't look so pretty or glamourous.
-A page of ads for other sites you have to pass through to get to the member's area. Then ads for other sites at the bottom of each member page. But a minor distraction.
-No 4K videos at the site.
-Photosets download with a computer-generated filename that is random. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
Default filenames don't include the model name, video title, or any useful data.
-Photosets are tiny sets of 10 photos or less. These attractive models deserve a photoset of 100 photos per set.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Video count: 181 Scenes
Video runtime: averages 20 to 30 minutes.
Site theme: Lesbian action. Most of the scenes are two girls making out. But there are solo scenes where a girl is masturbating by herself.
The major attraction of the site is how attractive these models are. Almost all of the models are cute or attractive to lovely.
The site features mainly European models. I would guess Eastern Europe (from Russia or surrounding areas). Slender, white, late teens and twenties in age.
A Girl Knows features lesbian action. Mainly two girls making out. Not a lot of seduction: just two hot girls who find themselves attractive to each other and don't waste time talking, but start exploring each other's bodies with hands, lips, tongues, some use of toys.
There are some beach scenes, and the video photography is so crisp, you wish you were at the beach yourself, with or without the glamourous models, because the ocean water and waves look so good, especially in the heat of summer.
The site (and some other sites in the network) feature high class glamcore porn: Not a lot of heartcore, just attractive people who are enjoying themselves sexually. The sets are expensive, the videos are crisply photographed, the models are made up to look as attractive as possible. The models are A-Class models, with names like: Arteya, Lena Love, Lola Myluv, Lya Missy, Silvie Luca, Vanessa Decker.
My favorite channel in the network is The White Boxxx, because it's one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet: Lovely models, expensive sets, first-class videography. But A Girl Knows is a fine glamcore lesbian site along the same lines as The White Box. The reason I prefer The White Boxxx over A Girl Knows is that The White Box features boy-girl sex, instead of the lesbian sex of A Girl Knows.
That's just my personal preference.
Giving the site a score of 90.
If you experience the problems that other PU members have found, such as slow download speeds, 100 video per month download limit is annoying, download manager doesn't work with the site, member pages are slow to load, the video player is slow, etc., then your personal score of the site would be much lower.
Personally, I no longer download a lot, and the other problems haven't affected me very much. And I don't have any use for 4K videos, which some PU members really appreciate.
That's why I'm giving the channel a score of 90, because I think it's an excellent glamcore lesbian site. |
|
09-09-20 07:52am
Replies (2)
|
Review
179
|
My Dirty GF
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Small site. 25 videos. Why is that a positive? Because the videos are crap, you can see this right off from the first video to the last video. So it doesn't take a long time to realize the site is crap.
-The models at the site are Markus and Nicky. They are in all the videos. Two below-average people in looks (Markus is a plain guy, Nicky is an unappealing girl). How is that positive? Because you quickly realize that you will either find the videos appealing or not, because this is home-style porn that you either like or dislike. Not a lot of variety in the style.
-One thing that is positive is the text description of the videos: it's short, direct, and covers the plot of the video:
Examples:
"When me and Nicky got to the bath together and I touched her wet body my cock became so hard that I couldn't stand any second and not to put it in her. I even shot it on camera to remind that horny moment sometimes." |
| Cons: |
-Joining the site directly is expensive: $29.95/month.
There are often sales that offer $14.95/month if you join the network directly, or $60/year.
Except there are better networks around that are more expensive, but offer better quality content.
-This is an archive site. The site has has 25 videos. That was the count in 2008, that is the count in 2020.
-Resetting your password is easy, if you get locked out. However, there is a captcha that is difficult to solve, and usually takes a few tries to get correct.
-Login and member pages are not secure. Your browser will probably have a popup that states the login and member pages are not secure and prone to hacking.
-Username and password are computer-generated. Can't choose your own. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site advertises the content is 100% homemade. This is plus and minus: Plus, that you know it's probably true, because the videos are so cheaply made: cheap sets, jerky filming technique, poor lighting, a stunt cock and the girlfriend model that are, to put it kindly, below-average-in-looks.
That's the plus side.
The minus side: I look at two of the videos at the site, and that's more than enough for me.
Why would I waste my time on this crap?
Why?
Because I want to post a review to qualify for one of the raffle prizes.
That's the only reason I'm writing a review on this throw-away porn site.
The site advertising or site description is false.
Maybe I'm being harsh.
The site says the stunt cock is 23 years old, the model is 19.
That might have been true in 2008, when the site was launched, but it's now 2020, 12 years later, so the models must be slightly older today.
However, the site contents were probably shot in 2008, and have never been updated.
So, in that sense, the models were 23 and 19 when the videos were made.
The site states the model is sexy and gorgeous.
Maybe she's sexy. But gorgeous? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: To me, this is one fug ugly girl.
Porn and life is a learning experience.
I'm still learning that people can believe wildly separate things about the same object.
To call this model gorgeous is to claim that Donald Trump, our beloved president, is the kindest, most caring person in the world.
And Trump is also the most honest person in the world.
Earth shaking ideas that rattle my brain.
The videos have a posting date of 2013. That is probably a lie.
They were probably first posted around 2008, when the site was first launched. And then the posting date for the videos was changed to 2013, to make it appear that the site was updating, even though there were no updates. Some sites change the posting dates of their content to try to fool the casual viewer that the site is updating.
The site had 25 videos in 2008.
The site has 25 videos in 2020.
I can't swear the 2020 videos are the original 2008 videos, but I strongly suspect that they are the original videos.
I would give the site a score of 55.
That's being generous.
The site advertises homemade-style videos. That is true. The sets (I call them sets, but they used whatever was available: a cheap apartment, sex in a car at a park, and lots more videos at the cheap apartment in the living room, the bathroom, the bedroom.
On the positive side: with membership to this site you get access to the entire network of about 20 sites. Almost all the sites are going for the homestyle vibe. Many of the sites are throw-away sites that no longer update. There are a number of cute models, and maybe you can find some videos worth watching. But I would rather spend more money and find a network with better quality content that I can enjoy more.
The network is surprisingly large, with 3,258 videos, around 20 sites.
Mostly the sites go for a home-based amateur style of shooting: cheap sets, teen-based porn that requires little scripting, not a lot of care put into making the models or videos look good.
The vibe is home-based videos. Except a lot of the girls are cute, and the videos could be so much better if they changed their style to make the girls more attractive, to upgrade the videos with better lighting and equipment.
Actually, that is what the network has been doing with a few of the sites that still update: they are changing the video approach from home-style to more mainstream style: better lighting, better sets, that present the models more attractively. So if you joined the network, and have the time, there are videos that are worth watching. |
|
09-09-20 07:39am
Replies (3)
|
Review
180
|
Nubiles Unscripted
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month (recurring), or $99.95/year (recurring).
Since this is a tiny site, you would only join because you get access to the entire Nubiles Porn network, which has 17 sites, and over 1,000 videos.
-Note: they are currently running a special price of $84/year recurring if you join through the nubiles-porn site directly. If you join through the Nubiles Unscripted site, the yearly fee is $99.95/year (recurring). Joining any one of the sites in the Nubiles-Porn network gives you access to the entire network.
-Many alternatives to pay for membership: Credit card, paypal, checking account, EU direct debit.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. Many other sites now charge extra for downloading.
-Streaming and downloading are offered in your choice of definition: 270p through 1080p.
-The production values are excellent: nice sets, crystal clear videos, good framing, steady cam-work, good sound control. And the girls are mainly attractive to very cute. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can play the videos at 1/4, 1/2, 1, 1.5, 2 times normal speed.
-Since the site is so small, you can browse the entire site videos in 1 or 2 days.
Download the videos you want, and then move on to the other sites in the network.
Except the Nubiles.net site is like an encylopedia, so you can spend hours and hours browsing through the site to find your favorite models.
CONS(START OF):
-This is a tiny site, only 16 videos. That is the main defect of the site.
-Archive site. Last update was in March 2018.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The advertising for the site is misleading: it promises multiple weekly updates. This is an archive site, the last update was in March 2018. The only justification for the claim of updates is if they say the advertising refers to the network. The advertising is placed on the site page, and does not mention that the updates refer to the network. So the advertising is definitely misleading. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats:
Videos: 16
Video runtime: 20 to 46 minutes.
The idea for the site was to create unique videos of girls getting off. Whether its lesbian or boy-girl, 2-or-more-girls-on-a guy, the settings change from an engine shop to a cabin in the woods to an off-road vehicle with a male driver and 3 cute girls giving each other a sexy time as well as the male stunt cock driver. To other locations.
The locations change, but the sexual energy is high.
There is very little plot. Not a lot of build-up before the teasing and sex starts. So you don't have to wait for the action to start.
I don't know why the site stopped updating in a little over a year: Maybe it was more expensive shooting at differnent locations, instead of a studio.
So the idea for the site was good, because it showcased cute girls having sex at different locations.
But the site stopped updating, and that is the major fault with the site: it only has 16 videos.
However, as I mentioned, membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network, so you have over 1,000 teen videos to sample, and find the ones you enjoy.
There are plenty of cute girls at the network.
One problem with the network is that many of the sites feature stupid plots.
And the models, while mainly cute, are not good actors.
Which takes away from the enjoyment of the sex.
You need to put your brain on hold while watching many of the videos at the network.
Or have a few beers or your choice of alcoholic beverage before watching some of these videos.
I'm giving the site a score of 65.
If this was a stand-alone site, I would heavily recommend against joining.
However, it's part of the Nubiles-porn network, and membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites.
The main jewel of the network is Nubiles.net, which is like an encyclopedia of fresh teen starlets.
Nubiles.net, by itself, is more than worth the membership price of the entire network.
Plus, you get the rest of the network to enjoy. |
|
09-09-20 03:06am
Replies (0)
|
Review
181
|
Nubiles ET
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-First rate technical features for the site and network.
-You can stream and download the videos in your choice of definition.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-There are currently 17 sites included in the network. They cover a wide variety of niches. Many of the sites feature stupid or repititive plots, but the models are mainly attractive, and the production values are top-quality, and some of the sex can be hot. So ignore the stupid plots, and focus on the attractive teen models who put on a show for your personal enjoyment.
-You can join through PayPal, credit card, checking account.
-You can choose your own username and password. |
| Cons: |
-Small site, only 30 videos.
-Last update was Feb 3, 2020. Could be considered an archive site. Maybe, once the virus epidemic has gone, they could start to update the site again.
-PU does not have a regular discounted membership price to this site. The regular price is $29.32/month, or $199.00/year, which is very expensive. You can often find discounted memberships to one of the other sites in the network, especially during holidays. Wait for a holiday, and join through one of the other network sites, to save money. Membership in any site in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network.
-You can often find a membership to the network for $19.98/month or $99.95/year, or maybe even cheaper.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site theme: videos are a parody of popular TV shows. The hardcore sex is supposed to add interest to the parodies.
However, the parodies don't impress me much. Give the performers an A for effort, but the acting skills are at the kindergarden level. The production values are excellent, and many of the models are very attractive teens, but the stories are so stupid, you should turn the sound off, but then a lot of the time is spent on meaningless story background, which I didn't find amusing, so I would give the site a score of 68, in spite of the good production values and the cute models.
Basically, I think the site is a waste of bandwidth, and the time and effort put into making the videos would have been better used to make straight hardcore porn. The site and network are trying to make alternative porn, but if you want alternative porn that is plot driven, you should watch the Pure Taboo site of the Adult Time network, which has excellent plot-driven porn of twisted desires.
Nubiles ET was launched Nov 15, 2018.
It has 30 episodes/videos, so it's a small site.
The last update was Feb 3, 2020.
It's now August 21, 2020, so it's been over 6 months since the last update.
I don't know whether the site will start updating once the virus epidemic has passed.
Either way, the site is small, and you can browse the videos in a few days or less.
Personally, I didn't find a single video that I enjoyed, or downloaded for keeping.
The network has 1400+ videos, and you will find a lot of good teen content for your viewing.
But the Nubiles ET site was a waste of time, for me.
In spite of the good production values and some cute models.
(The good production values do not include acting ability on the part of the models. Maybe it's also partly due to the poor scripts they were given to follow.)
Main takeaway: small archive site with stupid plots that detract from the sex. The site is a waste of time. However, you get access to the entire network, which has 17 teen sites, and the network does have value: a lot of attractive teen models, good to excellent production values, good choices for streaming and downloading. |
|
09-09-20 02:47am
Replies (0)
|
Review
182
|
First Anal Date
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You can sometimes find a low-priced membership of around $60 for 1 year.
-A lot of cute models at the site and network.
-Videos offered in your choice of definition:
Download from mobile up to 4K.
Streaming offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
-Video runtime around 25-30 minutes, so easy to watch.
-Sex is basic, with oral, vaginal, anal.
-You get access to around 15+ sites in the network.
-Network has 3246 videos, 2256 models.
-Site has 182 videos. |
| Cons: |
-Archive site. Last update was May 29, 2020. Before that, the update rate was 1 or 2 videos per month.
-Login and member pages are not secure, so prone to hacking. A few days ago, I got a message my account was blocked, due to password sharing. I've never shared my password with anyone. I don't know if the account was hacked, or it's just a glitch with the site server.
-Navigation is poor. Multiple reasons for this:
-The search engine is messed up.
-1. It only returns a minimal number of hits if you enter a phrase such as "redhead model".
I got 3 hits. Surely, there are more than 3 redheaded models at the site and network.
2. The search engine freezes your search term. After entering the phrase "redhead model", I tried entering a different phrase to search for. The seach engine returned the previous search, "redhead model", and wouldn't search for a new phrase. Even when I logged out of the site and re-logged in, and tried use the search for a different phrase, the site still showed me |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
"redhead model" as my search term.
I don't know what to call it, except messed up. And worthless.
3. They have a model listing, but it's only for the network, not for the site.
And they mix in the stunt cocks in the model listing. So you have to manually page through thousands of mdoels in the model listing to find the models you might like. Which takes a lot of time. The model thumbnails are small and not flattering to the models, and the thumbnails for the individual videos are small and not flattering to the models, which decreases your interest in the videos.
It's just a poor presentation of the site and network.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Network advertises "most beautiful amateur girls ultimate hardcore action".
But that is standard porn hype. Many of these girls are Eastern European models you've seen at many different porn sites. And I wouldn't call the action the ultimate hardcore. If you want over-the-top hardcore, visit Rocco Siffredi, or the Porn Fidelity sites.
-The photosets download in only 1 file definition. But the quality is just OK to poor. The photos are more like screen caps. What is surprising is the size of the downloaded photoset. Around 245 MB for a photoset of 102 photos. MetArt's high grade high definition photos are in that size range, and First Anal Date's photos are more like screen caps than real photos, so I don't know why the First Anal Date photos are so large.
The First Anal Date photosets are not worth collecting, even when the model is cute, because the quality of the photos is poor.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
In spite of a number of attractive models, the site does not impress me much.
The videos seem like home-shot videos, even though they are probably professionally shot.
The sets are just OK, not as nice as what you find at many competing teen hardcore sites.
Stats:
Videos: 182 videos.
Video runtime: 20-30 minutes.
Photosets: around 100 pics per set.
Photoset size: around 245 MB.
Photo quality: poor.
I would rather spend a few more dollars and get a membership in a porn site/network that will give me better quality content. It's not the attractiveness of the models, but the overall impression of watching home-made sex videos that is poor.
The Wow sites, Teen Mega World, X-Art, are far superior, and worth paying a little extra for, over First Anal Date and its network.
Normally, I try to put more information in the bottom line.
But I covered most of the points in the cons sections.
I would not recommend joining this site. |
|
08-13-20 02:26am
Replies (5)
|
Review
183
|
Driver XXX
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month recurring.
-The technical setup of the site is excellent. You get all the mod cons you need.
-Stream a video in your choice of definition: 270, 360, 540, 720, 1080.
-Download a video in your choice of definition: 270, 360, 540, 720, 1080.
-The videos are professionally made: Crystal clear video, good sound quality (they often start a video with the stunt cock driving a car or truck, and the noises are slightly muted, so you can hear the model speaking clearly). Excellent focus. The videos are just so much nicer than some low-rent networks that offer what seems to be home-made videos.
-The models at the site and network are A-list models. (They have 1,300+ models at the network, so not all models are cute or gorgeous, but the overall mix of models is definitely A-list.)
-The photosets are offered in small, medium and large definition zip files.
The individual photos are professionally shot photos, not screen caps. |
| Cons: |
PROS(Continued):
-No downloads limits for streaming or downloading. As far as I know. Which is becoming rare, with many sites setting daily or monthly limits.
-Content is exclusive.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are minor. This is a tiny site, but you get access to the Nubiles Porn network, which is one of the finest porn networks on the internet. Mainly because of the Nubiles.net site, which is like an encyclopedia of teen porn models.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Archive site. Last update was Dec 23, 2015.
-Tiny site. 13 videos. And matching photosets.
-The default file title gives the title of the video, but not the name of the model, the date it was posted, or the site name. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats:
Number of videos: 13
Number of photosets: 13
The exact definitions of the small, medium and large photosets can vary slightly:
676px, 1127px, 3246px.
800px, 1333px, 3840px.
Video runtime: around 10-20 minutes.
-The plot of the videos is the same: a girl needs a ride, finds she forget her wallet, so she pays for the ride with sex instead of cash.
The car or truck has decals on the dashboard, which show:
"Gas, Grass or Ass
Nobody rides for free."
Which is a hint or precursor to the theme of the DriverXXX site: These girls don't have gas:
What girl is going to carry a can of gasoline with her when she is requesting a ride from Uber or Lyft?
Or carry grass, so she can get busted by the driver who's really an undercover cop or pervert?
So this is a real-life situation, where the only currency the girl has to offer is her body: SEX!!!
Since the site only has 13 videos, I don't know why they keep the site, except the videos are good, and there's no sense throwing away good content.
You will go through the site contents in less than a day.
However, you get access to the entire Nubiles Porn network, which has Nubliles.net, and around 14 other sites with over 1,300 teen videos that are top quality.
If the site was stand-alone, it would be 65 or lower.
Since the site gives you access to the Nubliles Porn network, I think the site deserves a score of 93, since Nubiles Porn is an excellent teen porn network.
Some PU members feel that a site should be scored as a stand-alone site, without reference to its network.
I believe if a site has free network access, that boosts the value of a site, because of the additional content.
But PU members are free to value or score the site however they want. |
|
08-13-20 02:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
184
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Note: I am including a lot of information about the Adult Time network, which includes the 21 Sextury network. This is because I think that 21 Sextury is a worthwhile join, but the value of the Adult Time network (an added bonus in membership to 21 Sextury) increases the value of a 21 Sextury membership by a large factor.
-21 Sextury is a network that is included in the Adult Time network.
Joining any channel in the Adult Time network gives you access to most of the Adult Time network.
-21 Sextury used to be a network of hardcore sites featuring mainly European models. There were over 50 plus sites in the 21 Sextury network, which was a huge amount of hardcore material. But as a channel in the Adult Time network, you gained access to over 50,000 hardcore videos. That video count has now risen to over 60,000 videos. And the Adult Time network now has over 250 channels. With 5 new releases per day for the Adult Time network.- |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Note: the figures for video and channel count for Adult Time are not exact: different pages of the Adult Time network show different counts for the number of channels and the number of videos and the model count. That just adds to the confusing mess that the Adult Time network is.
-21 Sextury and Adult Time have thousands of A-list models, along with plenty of B-list models. So you not only get a massive count of beautiful models, but also a lot of different age groups, different body types.
-The technical quality of the videos at 21 Sextury and Adult Time are high quality: professional directing, good focus, good lighting, excellent colors, good sound control, nice sets.
-The technical quality of the much older videos are of lower quality, of course. For example, a 2004 video offers definitions from 160p to 540p, and the lighting and colors are not the excellent quality of more recent videos. But those videos can still be watched for the curiosity value. |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-21 Sextury covers a wide range of niches. Straight fucking, anal fucking, blowjobs, pussy licking. Mainly one guy and girl, but also solo girl, gg, bgg.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading for most memberships. There is a lower-cost membership which is streaming only. But most PU members prefer to have the download choice included.
-Offers some 4K videos. But most of the recent videos are offered in 288p through 1080p. This is negative for PU members who demand the highest quality definition for their wide monitors, but acceptable for most PU members, I think.
-Customer support provided by Fame Support is excellent. There is a fast, responsive live chat that is 24/7.
-Login and member pages are https. So secured connection, less likely to be hacked.
CONS(START OF):
-Although 21 Sextury is not perfect, and Adult Time is not perfect, I think that the combination is one of the best bargains in porn today.
-The most important con about 21 Sextury and the Adult Time network is that the contents are a jumbled mess. They need a software engineer to organize the network and channel contents into an organized system that is easily searchable. A simple model listing for each network, for each channel. A simple listing of the videos for each network and for each channel. An upgrade of the search engine, to make it easier to use.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-21 Sextury and Adult Time has very little homosexual content, that I've seen. So not good for gay viewers.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
21 Sextury has been around for many years before it was folded into the Adult Time network.
21 Sextury network was launched in 2009, featuring mainly European models in hardcore action.
At one time the network had up to 58 sites. Which meant it was a large network covering many different niches.
Around 2018 most of the 21 Sextury network was added to the Adult Time network. At first, the merger was a hit-or-miss connection: If you joined 21 Sextury, sometimes they threw in the Adult Time network for free, other times a membership in 21 Sextury did not include Adult Time membership. At least one PU member was told he was getting Adult Time access with his 21 Sextury membership join, but did not get it. Contacting customer support did not solve the problem for him.
There are times when you can't depend on what a porn site advertises, or what the customer support team tells you. Which can be a major disappointment.
My story was different: I joined 21 Sextury on 2018-10-31, and got an email telling me I got free admission to Adult Time, as long as I kept my 21 Sextury membership.
At the time, I had no idea what Adult Time was. But soon found out it was a huge network with over 50,000 hardcore videos, and over 100 channels, covering a wide variety of niches. And the Adult Time network has only grown and expanded from there, adding more channels and more videos.
My favorite channel in the Adult Time network is Pure Taboo: plot-driven videos of twisted desire (the taboo element in the porn) with an artistic flavor and high production values.
I have been satisfied with my 21 Sextury membership, and I've kept it continuously since my Oct 2018 join.
I don't think the network is perfect. The navigation is messy, and needs to be simplified.
Not all the content appeals to me, but there is more than enough content, along with frequent daily updates, that I think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today.
21 Sextury used to be a large network of porn sites in the Gamma Entertainment stable.
Around 2018, a 21 Sextury channel was added to the Adult Time network.
At that time, 21 Sextury still existed as a separate network, in addition to being a channel in the Adult Time network.
The navigation for the Adult Time network in 2018, and for 21 Sextury, used to be simple and clean, and even though both networks had a massive amount of content (videos and photos), it was fairly easy to find model listings, and content listings, for the sites in 21 Sextury, and the equivalent model listings and content listings for the Adult Time channels.
But recently, that simple clarity has evaporated.
Adult Time keeps adding new content: channels, videos, photosets.
Instead of keeping the channels separated, with a simple listing of models and videos, they drop the content into the Adult Time network, and you can't find simple model lists and video lists for each channel.
What good is 50,000 or 60,000 videos, if you don't know what they are, or how to access them?
Size is good, until it becomes so overwhelming that it becomes a jumbled mess of channels and videos.
The network needs to hire a software engineer to make navigation simple.
Otherwise, there's a ton of worthwhile content, but finding the content is a pain in the ass.
BOTTOM LINE CONTINUES IN THE FIRST REPLY BELOW: |
|
08-09-20 05:19pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
185
|
Wow Orgasms
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the Teen Mega World network. Membership in any one of the network sites give you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for to access.
-It's easy to switch between different sites of the network. You don't have to re-login to each separate site.
-Low price. PU offers a $14.95/month recurring discount.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. |
| Cons: |
-Small archive site, only has 43 videos and matching photosets.
-Last update was April 2013. The videos are offered in 360p, 480p, 720p.
Many PU members want higher definitions, 1080p or 4K, for their viewing pleasure.
-Login and member pages are non-secure.
-The site features real teens. Some of them are attractive. But overall, I feel the site models are less attractive than the general level of the models of the entire network.
-Poor search engine. You enter a model's name, and you get numerous hits that are random. The best way to search for a model's content is to go the model's page, where you will find links to her content at the entire network.
-Vendo is the default payment processor. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch.
However, I've had many memberships through Vendo, and never had a problem.
Actually, I like Vendo, because the Vendo website shows you all your current memberships through Vendo. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
Whereas CCBill will only show you a single subscription on a single page (you have to enter separately your identification details for each sub you want to look up).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-A line of ads at the bottom of each member page. Not too obtrusive.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: is a female model reaching orgasm.
Most of the videos are guy/girl, but there are a few threesomes, and one lesbian video of two girls.
The site advertises: "This amazing website provides you with the greatest collection of massive 'Oh my God' orgasms. Stay here, and experience divine arousal followed by the most powerful climaxes!"
I think that's typical porn site exaggeration.
Although the videos do show orgasm, I couldn't find any divine, over-the-top videos at the site. For that, I would recommend Rocco Siffredi or the Teen Fidelity sites, which do offer some over-the-top videos of intense sex.
The site only has 43 videos (and matching photosets).
It was started in August 2012 and stopped updating in April 2013.
So it's a small archive site.
As a small archive site, the content is standard teen hardcore. The main positive about the site is that you get access to the entire Teen Mega World network. You can skim the site contents in less than a day, downloading whatever is of interest in less than a day. But the network itself has plenty of good, solid teen hardcore content with plenty of attractive young teens.
I'm giving the site a score of 70. If the site was a stand-alone site, the score would be lower. But as part of the Teen Mega World network, the site is worth browsing to find whatever content might interest you. |
|
07-26-20 06:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
186
|
Sell Your GF
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-3,200+ videos for the network.
-The network is still updating.
-Free lifetime access for ex-members. After your membership expires, you can still see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in the member zone.
-You can save your favorite videos, models and photosets.
-Low annual membership price. I joined for $60/year.
-The network has at least 9 sites you get access to.
-Telephone live support is supposed to be 24/7. But I never used it, to try it out.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading (at least, I never found any limits. However, I don't download a lot, so, based on my personal history, I wouldn't usually encounter any download limits if there were any.).
-You can steam the videos in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
-You can download the videos in 240p, 720p, 1080p, 4K.
-The network updates with 3 to 5 new videos and matching photosets per week. |
| Cons: |
-Login and member pages are not secure (no https).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-There is a live sex cams channel. I'm not interested in live sex cams. And when I click on the channel, I get a notice, in Spanish, that:
A problem has been detected with your account.
You can contact live support if you have questions.
(Why the notice is in Spanish I have no idea, since the rest of the network is in English.)
-Your login details are computer generated, instead of allowing you to choose your own.
-There is only 1 definition for the zip file for the photosets. But the photoset is mainly a screencap collection of the video. And hardly worth collecting.
Even when the models are cute, the photoset is not worth collecting. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site theme: A variation of kinky sex.
From the site description:
"They must be total perverts to sit there and watch their GFs get fucked for cash
For some of these guys watching their girlfriends get banged by another man is a real turn-on while for others it's a painful pleasure
Watch these hot amateur chicks get their brains fucked out by horny strangers right before their boyfriends' eyes"
If you get off from watching a guy sell his girlfriend for some needed cash, and enjoy the guy's humiliation, or it turns you on as a voyeur to watch a girl having sex in front of her boyfriend, this site will scratch that itch.
The vibe of the site: this is a home-movie collection of videos. They are not trying to make glamcore porn, but home-based porn, where you get the stunt cocks in cheap clothes, the models in cheap street clothes, a low-rent apartment where the sex takes place. The guy is selling his girlfriend for needed cash, and he watches some other guy having sex with his girlfriend.
Not only is this home-based porn, but it's Russian home-based, low-rent porn, where the attitude is, "She my girlfriend, I'm making money off her pussy." So, not a lot of romance or glamour to the attitudes or settings or costumes or makeup to make the girls look attractive.
The girls are young teens, mainly naturally attractive, but the sex is like a bologna sandwich where you grab two slices of bread, maybe swipe a bit of mayonnaise with a kife, slap in one or two slices of bologna, and start chomping away.
This isn't even bread-and-butter porn.
It's more like two slices of bread, slapped together, and eaten.
No pickles, no mayonnaise, no mustard, no lettuce, maybe a slice of bologna, nothing else.
So if you're tired of the normal glamcore porn, and want to go back to the good-old-days of low-rent porn, this site and network can fill that need.
The only problem is that a lot of the teens are cute girls.
And they deserve better treatment, to make their videos and photosets more enjoyable.
If you want simple teen porn, with attractive teen models that are attractive yet presented simply without a lot of glamour, I recommend the Teen Mega World network, which has thousands of attractive teens, that are fucked in a variety of ways.
In spite of the low membership price of this site and network, I would recommend looking for other sites to join.
Note: I'm not a fan of the home-based porn style of shooting.
I've seen videos from this network at tube sites (like PornHub and others), where those videos were attractive. That's why I joined this network, because the videos I saw from this network were attractive. The same videos, at the network, are far less attractive. I assume that either the tube sites, or the network, upgraded the sample videos.
I just wish the network did the same upgrades on the videos at the network.
Then, I would recommend the site and network as worth joining.
Normally, you think that the quality of a video at the original network is higher quality than the version at a tube site.
Site stats:
Site videos: 269
Site updates with one new video and photoset per month.
The network updates with 3 to 5 videos and photosets per week.
Network stats:
Network videos: 3,236
Network photos: 212,691
Network models: 2,254
Photosets: Average 50 photos per set, for the site and the network.
The network started offering 4K videos in late 2016 for their newest videos.
In February 2017, the network gave free access to expired members.
From now on all expired members get free limited access to our website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in your member zone. If your password stopped working you can reset it on login page or ask our support for help.
I'm giving the site a score of 75. Even with network access and a low membership price, I would not recommend joining.
Which is a shame. Because the network has a lot of cute teen models.
However, maybe I'm being too hard.
In all of the videos I watched at the site, the boyfriend stayed to watch the guy fucking the girl.
Maybe he was checking to see if the buyer was getting his money's worth.
Maybe the guy doing the selling wanted to make sure his girlfriend was enjoying the sex.
Maybe the guy selling, and the guy buying, were true friends and the money was just a device where they could share the girl without telling the girl the two guys were really interested in each other, and the girl was just a beard used to hide the fact the two guys are gay?
Questions like this could raise the score by a few points.
A listing of the sites included in network access is included in the first reply to this review.
As well as a few notes on the listing. |
|
07-14-20 06:44am
Replies (5)
|
Review
187
|
Digital Desire
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They've had a special discount of $9.95 for the first month for a while now. If you don't see that price listed, I'd wait for a holiday special price of $9.95 for the first month, since there are all kinds of holidays they offer that price at.
-They have an outstanding collection of beautiful and lovely models in the 18-early 20s age range.
-They have both photo sets and videos. The photo sets are offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-The videos are also offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. |
| Cons: |
-If you know what the site is, a stand-alone softcore glamour site of lovely young women, your expectations should be met. Don't expect hardcore action.
-The biggest con is probably that they constantly delete older material. Members often complain about it. I don't know why they delete when it irritates their members so much.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for most porn sites.
-No information on the models, except for the model's name.
-If you spend $75 at their on-site store, you get a free cock ring. Flash this cock ring at your local gay bar, and you can be the life of the party (sick joke?).
-This is a stand-alone site. No bonus sites are included with your membership.
-Video resolution goes up to 1080p. There are a few 4K videos, but they are definitely in the minority. Many PU members want a 4K option at the sites they join.
-Zip file for photosets is only offered in one definition. Strange for a glamour photosite.
-Some hot links don't work correctly. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats:
Photosets: 3,800+
Videos: 1,000+
Models: 700+
Stephen Hicks died in 2013. He was the main photographer and owner of the Digital Desire website.
He specialized in high quality glamour photography over a decades long career.
His work appeared in such adult magazines as Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler, High Society and many more when those types of magazines were in their heyday (late 1960s through the 1980s).
He had an eye for beautiful women. And he presented them lovingly in softcore glamour photography.
One common complaint from the site members is that a lot of the content has been disappearing for many years. Not sure why. You have memories of some outstanding photographs, you come to the site, and it's not there any more. Which can be disappointing. This can happen at different websites, but the Digital Desire site is almost famous for deleting content.
They have over 700 models, most range from attractive to lovely.
Lena Anderson, Lexie Fox, Bailey Rayne, Keisha Grey, Shyla Jennings, Jade Couture, Kenze Thomas, Kasey Chase, Victoria Valmer, Aubrey Belle, the list of gorgeous women just goes on and on.
How a model is presented can make a world of difference in how attractive she looks.
Digital Desire, under Stephen Hicks, was famous for its softcore glamcore approach.
Since he died in 2013, the site has featured a harder edge: it's not hardcore, but what you could call midcore, with female masturbation, lesbian. But I couldn't find what you would normally call hardcore, which features men having sex with women. No men at the site (except for the photographers).
Note: the site did feature female masturbation and lesbian before 2013, but it was with a softcore approach. I'm not explaining this very well. Let's call this a softcore site featuring some female masturbation and lesbian activity.
If you are a fan of the Playboy and Penthouse magazine photo layouts from the 1970s, then this site will probably appeal to you. Stephen Hicks contributed to those magazines. He had an eye for beautiful young women, and presented them in a loving glamcore setting. In both indoor and outdoor shoots.
Many photographers seem to have a problem with outdoor shoots. With the lighting or sound control or other factors. But the Digital Desire site has a professional approach that showcases the photo sets and videos and they are just a pleasure to view. And the soundtrack, which can often be annoying with random sounds or over-loud music at some sites, is not distracting. The Digital Desire site just presents you with a polished, softcore product, which is what you are looking for.
Although this site does not compare in amount of content versus such mega-sites as MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, I think it's definitely worth a join, if you are a fan of softcore glamcore photography.
Especially with the $9.95 price for the first month of membership. |
|
07-01-20 03:56am
Replies (7)
|
Review
188
|
Anal Beauty
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-As part of the Teen Mega World network, you get access to 30+ teen sites.
-The last few years, the site offers videos with definitions from 360p through 2160p (UHD).
Earlier videos are from 360p through 1080p.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads.
-This is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks. Based on the level of attractiveness of the teen models, the quality of the videos. They are not glam videos, but they are excellent quality: nice sets, nice costumes (nothing fancy or glamourous, just nice clothes), good lighting and sound control.
And the videos are, in my estimation, bread-and-butter videos, showing teen sex in different categories. That applies to the network.
The site features anal sex. Maybe some cock-sucking, pussy-licking, pussy-fucking, but each scene that I saw had at least some anal sex.
I don't know why the videos appeal so much to me. They are just straight sex. Not violent or abusive, just a guy and girl having sex. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
And since the site theme is anal, they include that as part of the sex. The girls seem to really enjoy getting fucked up the ass. Along with getting fucked up their pussies. What can I say? The models, which are mainly attractive to some really lovely girls, are having a good time. And I would assume the guys are too.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Login and member pages are non-secure (not https).
-The search engine is poor. If you enter a model's name, you get a bunch of hits that are not the model's name.
-If you want to find the model's content at the site or at the network, go to the model's page, and that will give you links to her content.
-They advertise daily updates. That refers to the network, not to the site. Anal Beauty site updates with 1 or 2 videos per month (with matching photo sets).
-The thumbnails of the models need to be upgraded to show how attractive these girls are. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
-I wish they would tone down the moans, groans, screams of pleasure of the models, to make the sex more realistic. I assume the girls are having a good time, but moans, groans, and screams of pleasure are just too theatrical to be real. It's better than having the girls crying and moaning as if in pain, but are these girls really such nymphos that just touching a cock will start them moaning and groaning, and licking the guy's ass and cock and balls while emitting strange sexual noises?
I know some girls do get excited in sex, and make noises, but these models are directed to show excess enthusiasm.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: anal sex.
The site definitely shows anal sex in action. Along with vaginal sex, licking pussies, licking balls and cocks, licking the guy's ass.
So if you are into anal sex, this site should be a good fit.
Just turn down the volume if you don't want your roommates and/or neighbors to hear the screams, moans, bodies-slapping against each other. Although I wrote that the sound control is good, that means that you don't usually hear trains or airplanes or other extraneous sounds. But the noise these girls make is truly excessive. I know they are supposed to be excited, and enjoying the sex, but the noise level from the girls is just too fucking loud. And the guys, while not as noisy, are also told to make grunts and groans to show how much energy they are putting into the sex.
Having said that, these teens are fine-looking girls with lovely bodies. And they put on a sexual show for you. The noise might be excessive, but the basic action is not. And I appreciate that the sex is energetic without being over-the-top with violence or sadistic elements. The girls seem to really appreciate the attention the guys are paying to them.
Anal beauty is a fine teen site. With 144 videos and matching photo sets.
If you are into anal sex, the network has plenty of other anal content.
As well as a wide variety of other teen sex niches.
I'm giving the site a score of 90. Because the site is good, and the network is excellent, if you are into attractive teens having sex. |
|
06-17-20 11:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
189
|
Bounty Hunter Porn
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all 17 sites in the network.
-Tiny site. Only 5 videos (and matching photo sets). So you can view and download the entire site in less than a day. That's a pro and a con. Pro, that you can easily see and download the entire site in less than a day. Con, in that once you've viewed/downloaded the videos, the site itself has nothing more to offer. Except that you also have access to the rest of the network.
-The site theme is bounty hunters chasing bad girls and then having sex with them. This is an easier plot to follow than most teen porn site themes, because it requires less acting on the part of the girls. All the girls have to do is cry and plead to be freed, which is simple acting. Much easier acting than trying to follow some script where the girl is supposed to show emotion and the girl just looks stupid because she's not an actress. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
I'm not saying the bounty hunter plot is believable, but it's more believable than many of the teen hardcore plots that sites come up with.
And since you only have 5 videos at the site, you don't start to get bored with the same plot being used over and over again.
-Easy site navigation. With only 5 videos at the site, it's easy to see all of them. The only thing simpler navigation would be if they only had 1 video at the site, which would definitely make the site navigation even simpler.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Tiny site. Only 5 videos (and matching photo sets).
-Archive site.
The first video at the site is dated Dec 18, 2015.
The last video at the site is dated Sep 19, 2016.
So the update rate was very slow and erratic. |
| Bottom Line: |
The videos are available for streaming and downloads from 270p through 1080p
The video runtime is about 20 to 30 minutes.
The photo sets have about 80 to 100 photos.
The faces of the bounty hunters are blurred, to protect the innocent. But faces (and bodies) of the criminal girls are shown, along with their entire bodies. No blurring for the girls, who are really dirty sluts, except they must have taken a bath before the video was shot, because their bodies are clean and white in stunning color.
Site theme: The models are cute teens. But they are bad girls, who are wanted by the law. Once a bounty hunter sees the girl, he chases her down. Your heart goes out to these girls, because they are so young and pretty, and you know, in your heart, they didn't mean to commit any crime. But the bounty hunter is relentless, and he either ties her up, or puts her in handcuffs.
The girls are terrified, and plead to be set free.
The bounty hunter is a mean son of a bitch, who ignores the girl's pleas. But maybe, just maybe, the bounty hunter is also a little bit human. And he is attracted to the girl, because she is young and cute. Once the girl is on her knees, and somehow rubbing the bounty hunter's cock (because a girl on her knees close to a guy's crotch instinctively knows to start rubbing a guy's cock), the hunter and girl start to get even closer. The girl knows the bounty hunter is a mean son of a bitch, and that turns her on. And the hunter knows the girl is willing to do anything to be set free. So, an unconscious is struck, where the guy and the girl are going to have sex.
This is the dramatic plot that guides these videos.
Be prepared to hold back your tears of pity for these vulnerable girls, because the bounty hunter, a bad man with a strong cock, will make these girls squeal with pleasure while he is borking them like crazy.
The fact that some of these girls, while cute, are also tiny teens, just adds to the pleasure of seeing them get off with the bounty hunter.
The idea for the site is great. I don't understand why they only made 6 videos for the site, before stopping the series. The site theme is at least as good as most of the rest of the network themes, and the models are able to act out the plot more believably than many of the other site themes.
Also, even though this is forced sex, the sex is not rough or crude or violent. It's just straight, hardcore sex, with no slapping, hitting, spitting, cursing, etc. The girls squeal a lot, but that's supposed to show sexual excitement, not pain or torture.
So, even though this is a tiny site, it does a good job of filling the niche for dominant male, submissive female story line. And the fact that the models are cute teens, and mainly petite, just adds to the theme.
The twist at the end of the video is that the girl, who has been given the fuck of her life, expects the bounty hunter to let her go free.
But the bounty hunter is a dominant male. He knows he gave a thrilling fuck, and he is still going to turn her over for the bounty. So he's fucked her twice: once sexually, and a second time because the girl thought she was exchanging sex for freedom, and she is wrong: she is still going to jail for the bounty hunter to be paid.
It's a man's world, kitten.
End of story.
Makes you feel good you're a man. And can fuck these poor girls over again and again.
How can they improve the site?
The easiest way would be to start adding new content to the site.
A second method would be for the bounty hunters to add a siren to their chase vehicle, which a van.
They need to upgrade to a Maserati or some exotic sports car which can go zoom-zoom while they are chasing the girls, and blast their siren to add to the excitement. That would get the blood racing of the male audience, who want to jump on their Harley-Davidson motorcycles and help capture the girls.
In your mind's eye, you can see yourself zooming along the streets and highways, helping the bounty hunters catch hold of these girls, maybe holding them down while the bounty hunters use handcuffs or ties to subdue the runaway teens, maybe even helping the bounty hunter while he has sex with the girl.
And at the conclusion of the video, you can imagine yourself telling the girl: "Crime does not pay."
That's almost as good as watching the creampie the bounty hunter leaves on the girl's pussy.
Porn is fantasy. So why not go all the way, and imagine you're part of the video. Either as an active participant who is helping the bounty hunter. Or acting as the bounty hunter himself.
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
That's because, in spite of the tiny amount of content (5 videos and matching photo sets), I think the videos do a great job showing how men can dominate and control women in the real world.
You also get access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network of 17 sites.
Without access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network, which has a lot of lovely young teens, the score would drop considerably. |
|
06-17-20 12:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
190
|
Petite HD Porn
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the Nubliles Porn network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you full access to the entire network of 16 different sites.
-No download limits, no streaming limits. Many sites are starting to limit downloads, or starting to charge extra for downloads, so unlimited downloads for no extra charge is getting to be a nice feature.
-login and member pages are https, which means the pages are secure, less prone to hacking.
-Easy navigation of the site. Easy to switch between sites.
-A major strength of the site (and network) is how attractive these young teens are. Many teen sites have lots of attractive to gorgeous models, so this site and network don't stand out for the quality of the models, but you have to give the site and network credit for picking such attractive models.
-CCBill and Epoch are the primary billers, so they are trusted names, easy to cancel, easy to deal with.
-The site has 202 videos with matching photo sets on 2020-06-13. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos average 15 to 25 minutes, which is shorter than most teen hardcore sites, but the videos cover all the action needed for a hardcore porn scene.
-You can control the streaming speed of the video: from 0.25X to 2.0X.
-Can select the streaming definition from 270p through 1080p.
-Video download definition choice from 270p through 1080p.
CONS(START OF):
-The cons are basically minor. One of the better teen networks.
-Slow update rate. Recent updates are 1 video (and matching photo set) per month. But with the coronavirus epidemic, you take what you can get, and try to be thankful.
-The thumbnail that illustrates the model in the video is small. Would be nice to have a larger thumbnail, so you can get a better idea of what the model looks like.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The regular 1-year membership is $199. Wait for a holiday special (lots of them each year) and you should be able to join for $100 or less. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site theme: petite teens having sex: female masturbation, lesbian sex, boy-girl sex, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 girls-1 boy.
The girls are real teens, small, cute to lovely. They put on a good show while demonstrating their appetite for sexual satisfaction.
This would be considered reality porn: it's not glamour porn, the girls are not put into glamourous settings or glamorous costumes, but they are young and attractive, and eager for sex. The sets and costumes are not glamourous, but they aren't the cheap low-rent settings and costumes of porn from 2000 or earlier that many Russian sites started out with.
The mood of the lesbian videos can be slow and sensous. It's not really seduction, more like two girls expoloring each other's bodies in a friendly, loving way.
The moods of the videos varies. It can be slow and senuous, or perky and fun, or whatever.
Since the girls are young, petite, and mainly attractive, you're just supposed to relax and enjoy these videos (and photo sets).
Most porn models are not great actors. So when you see some of them trying to do the perky teen bit, it can seem false. Dakota Fanning, not a porn model but a fine actress, when she was a pre-teen, did lots of interviews for her movies, and she came across as a cute, wonderful girl with lots of energy and enthusiasm and intelligence. And it seemed real. Watching a porn model trying to project the same bubbly image, it just seems fake. I'd much rather watch a Dakota Fanning movie made years ago than watch a blonde porn model smiling and twirling and shaking her ass and waving her arms because she's so full of fake enthusiasm and happiness for life.
Kiara Cole, fine petite teen body, shitty actress. They should write a script for her that doesn't require much acting. And less fake smiling. Along with her false eyelashes. Why do so many porn models wear false eyelashes? Less moans and groans and fake screams would make the video seem more real.
You have access to the entire Nubiles Porn network of 16 sites. All the sites are teen-centric, and almost all the teen models are attractive to cute. But the site themes and plots are paper-thin.
So turn your brain off a little, to enjoy these lovely girls.
Some of the videos are crystal clear, and watching the fine bodies of these teens can be an enjoyable experience.
I'm giving the site a score of 93, because you not only have access to a site of 202 teen videos, but access to 15 other teen sites. |
|
06-16-20 07:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
191
|
Sex Art
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a professional, high class offering of erotic porn.
-A large catalog of photo sets and videos.
-Updates daily. Either a photo set or a video.
-The main strength of the site is the level of the attractiveness of the models. Both the girls and the men are attractive. The women range in age from late teens to the twenties, and are either good-looking or beautiful.
-Videos are offered from 220p to 4K (UHD), in download.
-Photo sets are offered in high, medium and low definition zips.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. No limits, no extra charge for downloads.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.99/month recurring. |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross-sale in join page.
-The videos lack heat. Although this is glamorized hardcore sex, it's more like a softcore version.
The site offers high-quality professional videos and photo sets, but the videos just lack heat.
-The videos often have a setup of 10 minutes or less, before the sex starts. Since the video runtime is 30 minutes or less, that doesn't leave much time for the sex. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats:
Videos: over 1200
Photo sets: Over 1600
Number of photos per set: Over 100
The site theme is softcore erotic sex. I say softcore, because it's glamourized sex, not raunchy, but it would be considered hardcore. You have guy/girl, girl/girl, and solo female masturbation.
-SexArt is like a glamorized, erotic version of MetArt. MetArt focuses on photos, although it also offers some videos, and the videos at MetArt are becoming slightly more erotic. But there is no sex in the MetArt videos. There is sex in the SexArt videos (and photo sets).
-Although I think the videos lack heat, the photo sets are more erotic. Looking at Candy Kate, in her first photo set at SexArt, titled "First Time", posted Jun 04, 2020, she is a wet dream come true. It's a solo model set, but she is fucking gorgeous. Or maybe sexy is a better word, because I've seen prettier models, but none more luscious, more fuckable.
Note: you are supposed to respect the models, but respect has nothing to do with it: Candy Kate is hot. At least in the Sex Art photo set titled "First Time".
She has 2 photo sets at MetArt. The same model, professionally photographed in high-class glamour setting, but the set at SexArt is far more erotic.
The site is easy to navigate. And the search feature is excellent for bringing up a model's content at the site.
I can't describe what makes the photosets are SexArt more erotic than the photosets at MetArt. Maybe it's because I have seen thousands of photosets at MetArt, and I'm becoming slightly bored with that site.
But the photosets are SexArt are just more enticing. More erotic. I have a hunger for the model at SexArt, while at MetArt, I think she is cute or attractive, but no hunger. Even though MetArt has thousands of really attractive, even beautiful or gorgeous women.
I'm giving SexArt a score of 90. It has a fine catalog of outstanding women. But outstanding women are common: Femjoy, MPL Studios, MetArt, and a score of other fine photo sites have 1,000s of outstanding, lovely models.
What could SexArt do better? They could put some heat into their videos.
But their photo sets are really outstanding. |
|
06-10-20 11:47am
Replies (1)
|
Review
192
|
Teeny Lovers
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The site has a lot of cute teens. But not much effort is put into making them as attractive as possible.
-You have a choice of two formats for videos: MP4 and WMV. But the MP4 has more definitions to offer.
From mobile to 4K (Ultra High Definition).
-The photosets have a zip file, that downloads with the title of the video (but not the model's name). |
| Cons: |
-Although the photosets have about 60 photos per set, the individual photos are screencaps, that are not very good. I'm seen much better screencaps at other sites that were produced by a software program that makes photosets from a video shoot. So even if the model is attractive, and many of these models are, the photoset is not worth collecting. You could problably produce your photosets from the downloaded video with better quality from a free software program.
-Slow update rate: 2 or 3 videos per month. You also get matching photosets with each video.
-Login and member pages are not secure. Not https. So easy to hack login details.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Username and password are computer-generated. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats:
Movies: 460
Models: 2249
Photosets: 2468
Videos run about 30 minutes or less.
Site theme: teens fucking. A guy fucks a girl. Very basic teen hardcore sex.
Many of the models are cute to very attractive, but not much effort is put into making the models look good. The good looks come from their youth (18 to early 20s in age), and the care taken to select good looking girls.
The vibe of the site is the same basic vibe used for most of the 18Videoz sites: this is reality-based porn, and no effort is made to glamorize the movies with nice clothes, expensive sets, great lighting: they are trying to present videos that look like they were shot by an amateur, even though the videos are professionally shot: but the clothes, settings, models, are trying to present an everyday hardcore sex scene that is a girl or a guy/girl having sex. Not over the top sex, but sex in which both parties are getting their kicks.
So the sex they show is teen hardcore sex, no glamor, just blowjob mixed with vaginal and anal fucking.
Even though many of the models are cute teens at Teeny Lovers, I much prefer watching the videos at Teen Mega World, or at the Wow sites, or the sites that are run by the Wow managers (Ultra Films). The Teen Mega World is straight teen hardcore, the Wow sites and Ultra Films add a touch of glamour, but the Teen Mega World videos are just more enjoyable, and the network has a ton of lovely young teens. The Wow sites and Ultra Films have many of the same models as the Teen Mega World network, and the quality of the videos and photo sets at these sites is outstanding: gorgeous teens, high production values for the videos and photos.
I'm giving the site a score of 82.
That's very random.
If watching a guy and girl get it on, and you don't need any frills to make it more interesting, this site might be worth joining. Especially if you can catch a holiday discount. I joined for 12 months for $60.
The Best Porn lists the following memberships:
Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (3 months, non-recurring)
1 Year: $119.95 (recurring)
I would advise joining Teen Mega World, if you can catch a low-priced offer.
Or, pay a slightly higher price, and join one of the Wow sites (you get All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn with a membership in any one of the 3 sites). |
|
06-10-20 10:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
193
|
MetArt
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-One of the premier softcore glamcore sites on the internet.
-The biggest collection of models and photosets on the internet. The site has been around since 1999, and updates with 4 new sets (photosets + an occasional video) daily. On the first of the month, they update with 6 new sets.
-They offer a zip file for each photoset in 3 definitions: low, medium, high.
-They offer a streaming photoplayer to view the photosets, with a time-lag you choose for each photo.
-They offer a cover and also a clean cover (the cover of the photoset without any script) for each photoset or video. Useful for collectors who want a simple reference to the collected content.
-They offer unlimited streaming and downloading. Which is a nice feature, in the period where many sites are starting to charge extra for downloads or have download limits. |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-They did a recent site update, and dropped some useful features:
They used to have a listing of all the sets posted for each year, with the years divided by months.
That feature is gone. It was an easy way to browse through the back catalog. Now, I don't know an easy way to browse through the back catalog in a systematic way.
-They used to have a feature where you could mark your favorite models and favorite photosets. That is gone.
-The videos at MetArt used to be boring. In spite of the nudity of pretty or lovely models, the videos had almost zero erotic content. Lately, the videos are showing some erotic content. Although there is no masturbation or sexual activity, the models are now allowed to touch themselves, which is a giant step forward. Almost all the videos are solo girls, but the new videos can be considered slightly erotic.
-The quality of the models has been going down recently. That is a personal opinion. |
| Bottom Line: |
Stats
-Over 3,000 models.
-Over 21,000 photosets
-Almost 300 different contributing photographers
-Number of photos per photoset range from 100 to 170.
This is probably the finest softcore glamcore site on the internet.
I've been a member of this site, continously, for 7 years now.
Maybe I'm getting crotchety in my old age, but I personally don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I think the level of the model attractiveness has been going down.
I miss the old features, where you could list your favorite models and photosets.
I miss the listing of the site content by year and month, that made searching the content much easier.
The videos are getting slightly more erotic, whereas in years gone by, they were a waste of time and money and talent, because they were almost all boring.
But for variety, I think I should join MPL Studios, or Zemani, or Femjoy, or some other fine glamcore site.
This review is very subjective.
I wrote in an comment on MetArt a few months back, that I didn't like the recent changes at MetArt.
PU member blaine responded, on 10-29-19:
"Completely disagree, I love the new layout, look/feel of the website, I found all the important features still available, just access is more intuitive. Been subscribing to Met and the available network of sites for years, hadn't noticed any drop off in the quality of the models. But just my preference I guess. I still love the site."
Maybe my review is too subjective. But it reflects what I believe.
I don't enjoy the site as much as I used to.
I'm giving the site a score of 92. A few years back I gave it a 95. However, other PU members can score the site higher than I do, because they seem to appreciate the site more than I do.
But any score of 90 or more indicates an excellent site, on technical merits. |
|
06-04-20 06:54pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
194
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-They are running a current special of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
But the special one year price is $60, which is very low.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So ISP does not keep a record of each member page you visit
-No streaming or download limits that I can find.
-You get confirming emails on signup, with your login details, subscription id, order details (price and duration of membership), credit card used, etc.
-Most videos are available in 320p through 4K definition.
-Videos have a runtime of 20 to 30 minutes.
-Photosets are available in zip files in 2 definitions: low and high. |
| Cons: |
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-User name and password are computer generated, so have to write them down. But they are in the confirming emails, so can copy and paste into login page.
-The site has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, but the thumbnails are usually poor photos of the models: a home photographer could easily take photos that would make the models more attractive.
You look at the thumbnails of the models, and realize that the girls in any mall would look much better than what these models look like. How you photograph a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears.
I look through the thumbnails of the models, and I find some models I'm familiar with, such as Delphine, who is a very attractive blonde model, and at this site (at least, in the thumbnail), she is not attractive. Nika O, another attractive model, looks poor.
If a site does not have attractive female models, I usually have little interest in the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(CONTINUED):
Even the models I know can be very attractive, at this site thumbnails, are not attractive.
-The online photoplayer is slow.
-The quality of the photos varies. From poor to OK.
-I've seen many screen caps at competing sites that were far better quality than the photos at this site: two problems with the photos at this site: the models are not made up to be attractive. The second problem is the quality of the photos: they are just poor photos. Even models that I've seen can be very attractive at other sites, at this site, they are not attractive. The colors of the photo are poor. The model looks poor. The photosets are a waste of time.
I look at the photos of Nika O, an attractive teen. I know it's her, because I've seen her at other sites. And I've seen her at other sites with the same name. But at this site, in the photos, she looks like poor. At MetArt, Nubiles, ShowyBeauty, she is an attractive young teen. Sexy. Erotic. An object of desire.
At Wet and Puffy, she is a piece of meat I would not look at twice.
Am I over-reacting? I don't think so.
Porn is fantasy.
But if the image of the model is so unappealing, the value of the porn is damaged.
There was a recent poll at PU that asked: "Do you feel high-quality photos are an important part of a site's content?"
Well, the photos at Wet and Puffy are not high-quality photos. They are low-quality photos, that degrade the value of the models, that degrade the value of the site.
Sites like X-Art, the Wow sites have good to excellent photosets, that display the attractiveness of their models.
The Teen Mega World network has improved the quality of their photos over the years, to the point where the photos can present attractive young teens and contribute to the quality of the network.
The photos at Wet and Puffy are poor photos, that degrade the value of the site.
Even when they do have models that are naturally attractive, those models are presented as un-attractive females.
Holly, another attractive model, has 1 video at Wet And Puffy. An attractive model, pretty face, voluptious body, but the video is hurt by the skin tones of the model. She's just not attractive.
At Wow Girls, where she's listed as Barbie, she looks great. At Wet And Puffy, because of the poor skin tones, she looks blah. Not pretty or attractive.
The lighting and other factors can add or detract from the value of a video, and at Wet And Puffy, the photos and videos are poor. Even when they take a pretty model, she will look poor or unattractive in her photos and videos at Wet And Puffy.
BOTTOM LINE(Start of):
Site theme: The site classifies a woman's pussy into one of three types:
puffy peach, juicy cherry or big taco.
So the site focuses on pussies and toys.
Whatever it takes to get a woman off.
(Except no men are allowed.)
So you get all kinds of masturbation with toys.
-You get access to 6 sites with a membership.
wetandpuffy
weliketosuck
wetandpissy
puffynetwork
simplyanal
eurobabefacials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Porn is fantasy.
One of the main factors I look at is how attractive the models are.
The models at Wet and Puffy are not presented attractively.
That is a major negative factor, for me, at least.
So, in spite of the current special price of $60 for one year, I would not join this site.
That is a personal judgment.
Other PU members have found the site to have value.
Homegirl gave the site a score of 90.
mbaya gave the site a score of 95.
tangub gave the site a score of 84.
It's a large site.
Over 900 videos.
Over 900 photo sets.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN FIRST REPLY: |
|
05-20-20 05:17am
Replies (1)
|
Review
195
|
Adult Time
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A great catalog of high quality hardcore porn for a low price.
I suggest waiting for a holiday special, either to the main network or to one of the many sites that give you access to the Adult Time network with membership. There are many sites that do this, and during holidays, you can sometimes find some really nice bargain.
PU has a discounted price of $95.40/year recurring, or $19.95/month recurring.
Those are nice prices, but I joined for $62.95/year, and have kept that membership active, since it's easier for me to visit the site and see what's new and what's old, rather than trying to download a boatload of content and try to look for specials again. The specials do pop up at holidays, but I haven't found any at $63 again. But Devils Film and 21 Sextury and other site/networks advertise holiday special rates all the time, except that most of the ads are for $95.40/year that the PU site gives you anyway.
-Login and member pages are secure. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
I get nervous on sites that are non-secure, with each login stating "This connection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
In addition to being more easily hacked, your ISP keeps a record of your visits to these porn sites, the site and the member pages you visit, and which is available to your friendly law enforcement people, as well as major spy organizations which the US government either denies or states: "No comment."
-They have a huge number of A-list models, as well as B-list models, and maybe C-list and D-list models. And you can find all types of female models (from cute and attractive to un-attractive) and male models (young and old).
-They cover so many niches. But it seems to be light on gay porn (homosexual). The network is strong on lesbian porn, but weak on gay (homosexual) porn. I'm making the distinction, which might be old-fashioned, because when I was younger, I thought gay meant both guys liking guys and girls liking girls. |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
But in today's world, there are so many distinctions and politically correct attitudes, I don't know if gay includes lesbian, or if gay only includes male/male.
-No download or streaming limits. But they do offer a streaming-only membership, for a lower price.
-Downloads and streaming are offered in different definitions.
-Zip file for the photosets. But some photosets are a reduced number of photos from the original sites, sometimes 10 photos in a photoset.
CONS(START OF):
-They have a huge catalog of hardcore content covering many niches, many channels (they call their sites channels). Which is great. Except that the content is massive, they've advertised over 50,000 videos for years, they keep adding more videos, more channels, more series, and navigating that content becomes a chore, to find what interests you.
They really need to do a network re-design to simplify the navigation: to make searching the content easier.
Too much of a good thing, because they keep adding more content, and, to me, at least, it has become a jumbled mess.
-If you want to find and search the contents of a single channel, it's not easy: A year or two ago, it was much easier to bring up a chronological listing of the videos of a single channel. But not any more. You have to dig to find most of the videos of a single channel, which is frustrating: I want a site or network that is easy to use.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
I think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today:
-A massive collection of high quality hardcore videos. 50,000+.
-A massive collection of featured models, both female and male. The network is light on gay porn, but massive on straight porn and lesbian porn.
-A low membership price, especially if you can find a decent holiday special discount.
-Although I think the navigation is poor, because there's so much content I think it's a jumbled mess, they do organize the content into channels, and you can more-or-less find the content of a single model with links to her content at the entire network. So it takes time to find the content that appeals to you, but there is a huge amount of content that should be appealing for straight hardcore porn (which I assume includes lesbian porn, since that is one of the main strengths of the network).
-The Pure Taboo channel is one of my favorite channels at the Adult Time network. This is cinematic quality porn that is story-driven. One of the best hardcore story-driven channels on the internet.
The plots are about twisted desires, the lighting is usually dark for artistic reasons: I would prefer brighter lighting, but they are trying to create cinema with an artistic approach. Not to everyone's taste, but I find some of the stories interesting and erotic.
I don't know why, but one of the major strengths of the network is their focus on lesbian porn. Mainly young girls, but there are plenty of older women in the lesbian porn as well. And you get a wide range of models: in age, in body type. The models are mainly white. Not a lot of black or Asian.
You also get live cams. I'm not into live cams. So other than mentioning they are available, I haven't used them.
Adult Time is trying to be the modern supermarket of porn. They have over 50,000 hardcore videos, most of them high quality, plus they have over 100 channels, and keep adding more all the time. I think they are doing a very good job of one-stop-shopping for the porn consumer.
That's for the straight audience.
I think they are light on the homosexual audience with their offerings.
Some PU members have expressed disappointment with the network because they have seen a lot of the content from previous memberships at different sites. But that's what the Adult Time network does: it's gobbling sites and content from outside sites, and making that content part of the Adult Time network. And it keeps growing, with both internal content (that is original) and external content (that is taken from other sites).
I think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today.
Giving the site a score of 92. |
|
05-04-20 11:26pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
196
|
Young Sex Parties
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Low membership price. I joined for $59.95 for a yearly membership. I don't think this was a special discouted price, just the price I paid when I clicked on the network link at PU.
Note: when I click on the link from PU, I see much higher prices now:
$29.95/month
$119.95/year
If I had seen those prices, I would not have joined.
-Young Sex Parties is part of the 18Videoz network. So you get access to about 8 different porn sites at the 18Videoz membership.
Edit: I joined through the 18Videoz site, which includes the Young Sex Parties site.
If you join through the Young Sex Parties site, the much higher prices are what is shown. But you also get access to more sites. However, I believe the lower price of the 18Videoz is the better deal, because it gives you the flavor of the content offerings.
-The 18Videoz network advertises 3,200+ scenes, 2,246 models, 2,454 photosets.
-Edit: I don't know whether it's a mistake or not, but I see about 17 different sites at the 18Videoz network. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
Which would seem to include all sites included with a Young Sex Parties membership.
So if you want to join Young Sex Parties, I would definitely join through the 18Videoz membership, which is far cheaper.
Sometimes you come across sites which have different membership prices, and the cheapest membership gives you all the privileges of the higher priced memberships. It's just sloppy marketing, but it happens.
-Young Sex Parties has 255 movies. So it's a fairly large site.
-It't still updating. But at a slow rate. One new video per month. But you have a large site, and access to the rest of the 18Videoz network, which includes over 3,000 videos. Plus, the network advertises daily updates. However, many sites or networks advertise daily updates, and don't deliver.
I think this is because they maybe did offer daily updates, and when they stopped, they didn't change the advertising/description to reflect the current reality |
| Bottom Line: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
I've seen many sites that still advertise update rates, that is not currently true.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
Edit: I rarely download any more. But I don't see any notice of a download limit. And The Best Porn states there is no download limit.
-I believe the content is exclusive. I've never seen the content duplicated at any porn site, except for the tube sites, which seem to sample almost ever porn site I've ever joined, even content from MetArt, if you can believe. Not the MetArt photosets, but the MetArt videos.
-Downloads are offered in MP4 and WMV formats.
-The videos stream smoothly. No buffering problems.
-You can view the photosets online, manually, or as a slide show.
-I believe the photosets are screencaps, but good screencaps made from a good software program.
The photos are OK to good quality, but I wish the quality was better, because some of these girls are really cute. Note: almost all the girls are attractive to really attractive. These are real teens. Not thirty-year-olds trying to look like teens.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Login and member pages are non-secure. So easier for hacking.
-I wish the thumbnails on the video listing were larger, so I could see the models more clearly.
-I also wish they put the name of the model(s) on the video listing, so I could tell who the model is more easily, rather than needing to click on the video to bring up the video itself to see what the model looks like.
-There are ads for other sites, in large thumbnails, but in my current mood, I can ignore them somewhat, but I'm always looking for cute models, and sometimes I click on the ads to see what the site is (that's being advertised), and what the models at that site look like.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Young Sex Parties theme: Going to a party, having sex. Very casual sex. Not a lot of romance or build-up.
Categories: Amateur, Anal Fingering, Anal Sex, Asian, Ass Licking, Behind The Scenes, Big Boobs, Big Cock, Bisexual, Blonde, Blowjob, Brunette, Cream Pie, Double Penetration, Fetish, Foursome, Group Sex, Hairy, Handjob, Interracial, Lesbian, Masturbation, Mature, Outdoor, POV, Pornstar, Public Fucking, Redhead, Small Tits, Solo, Squirt, Teens, Threesome, Toys, Voyeur
Movies: 255 currently.
Both MP4 and WMV formats are offered for download.
Videos download in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
The models are real teens. Cute or attractive. From Eastern Europe, I assume.
Most of the videos I've seen have no subtitles, but who needs subtitles when most of the words I hear them speaking are "UUUUUhhhhh, AAhhhhhh, GGGrrroooannnhhh, UU, AA, uuunnnn, (choking sounds as she's sucking a dick).
Some of the sex parties videos are not real parties, but just a boy and girl fucking, or two boys on one girl fucking.
Or some other combination of one or more boys, and one or more girls.
I would say the site features bread-and-butter sex. There is little build-up, everyone knows they are they to put on a show, and they start to have sex. Vaginal, anal, cock sucking, slapping the girl's ass, with lots of moaning and groaning from both the girls and boys. Usually, most porn, it's the girl who is moaning and screaming, but at this site, the boys are equally vocal.
I'm afraid that in my current frame of mind, I get easily bored by straight fucking. I much enjoy plot-driven sex to add some meaning to the sex. Or maybe some nice costumes or nice settings.
Here the settings are plain: not cheap, but not expensive. Just an ordinary room or bedroom, with a couch or bed where the action takes place.
I must say, the girls really appear enthusiastic about sucking dick, and getting fucked.
And the stunt cocks are good or excellent. You've probably seen them at different porn paysites, because, while I don't know their names, I've seen over a hundred videos at Teen Mega World and the Wow sites and elsewhere, featuring some of these stunt cocks. And the stunt cocks still look like teens, or at least in their early twenties, even though they've been in the business for years.
Starting Feb 17, 2017:
Free access for expired members
From now on all expired members get free limited access to our website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in your member zone. If your password stopped working you can reset it on login page or ask our support for help.
I think that is a fine offer. I'm still an active member, but even if your membership expires, you will still be able to access the sites, and see all the picture sets, plus some other features.
Bottom Line: If you are satisfied with plain bread-and-butter sex, this site (and the network) should prove a good choice. You get, for a very low price ($60/year for the 18Videoz network), a ton of hardcore teen videos. I'm giving the site (with network access) a score of 85.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE REPLY SECTION: |
|
04-30-20 11:15am
Replies (1)
|
Review
197
|
Creampie Angels
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU discount of $14.95/month recurring.
-Newer videos from the last few years go from 360p up to 2160p.
-Site updates with one new video per month. This is a slow update rate. But the network updates with 6 updates per week. So you get plenty of updates, especially in the coronavirus epidemic.
-The models are real teens from Eastern Europe. Mainly attractive to really cute.
-Navigation is good. You can easily switch between sites in the network. Or, to examine a single site, you can page through the update listing of videos.
-The model page will list the girl's contents at the entire network, with hot links to bring up her content.
-Zip file for each photoset. But it comes in only one definition.
-The zip file for the photoset lists the model's name, but you have to manually add the site and whatever other data you want to keep track of for the photoset.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads. Nice feature, when many porn sites are switching to a limited download model. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can create your own login details: username and password, instead of computer-generated.
-Tags are simple but useful. A sample tag from a video:
Blowjob Cowgirl Creampie Doggy Style HD Video Photos Pigtales Pussy Licking Reverse Cowgirl Shaved UHD
CONS(START OF):
-Login and member pages are not secure.
-Poor search engine. Enter the name of a model, and you get a garbage number of random hits.
-Several PU members have criticized the cream pies as fake.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Vendo is the default biller, not a major name. But I've had many memberships through Vendo, and never had a problem. |
| Bottom Line: |
BOTTOM LINE
Site stats:
Videos: 219
Photosets: 219
Number of photos per set: around 99.
The photosets are made from the video shoot. But the photos are good quality.
Not MetArt quality, but good quality for a hardcore shoot.
I would like the photos to be even better, because these girls are cute teens to really attractive.
Each photo is 3500pX2333p.
The photo size is surprisingly large: around 1 MB.
The videos have an average runtime of under 30 minutes.
File sizes for the video downloads
360p MP4 273 MB
480p MP4 479 MB
720p MP4 1.07 GB
1080 MP4 1.67 GB
2160 MP4 2.88 GB
I was suprised the 2160p file size was not larger.
A 4k image file is 4 times larger than a 1080p HD image file.
Resolution wise, 4K (2160p) is twice the size of 2K (1080p) in horizontal direction and twice the size in vertical dimension. Since Area=Length x Width, Area wise, it's 4 times larger than 2k.
That refers to a photo's dimensions. But you would think the video file would have a similar effect.
But there are other factors involved, of course.
Site theme: creampies. And the site delivers on that promise.
However, serveral PU members have commented the cream pies are fake, which hurts the video.
Basically, you get a b/g, and they have sex. Pretty bread-and-butter, not a lot of build-up, just a horny guy and a horny young teenager. What helps is the teen is an attractive girl, and she's eager for sex. The sex is hardcore, but mild: no slapping, spitting, arm-twisting. Just sex.
So if you're looking for over-the-edge sex, you should try a different site.
The main strength of the site is the attractive roster of teen models.
They are willing and ready to suck dick, have their pussies eaten, and get a creampie at the finish.
Login is easy, especially if you have cookies enabled.
No captcha to solve, which is great, because the captchas at some sites are ridiculous.
Navigation is easy: to find the content of a model, go to her model page, and you will see hot links to her videos at the site and network.
Giving the site a score of 92. It's a nice-sized site (219 videos), plus you have over 5,000 videos at the network. The slow update rate of 1 video per month at the site is made up for with the 6 videos per week at the network, plus the large catalog of network videos. |
|
04-30-20 01:02am
Replies (0)
|
Review
198
|
Daddys Lil Angel
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network of 16 sites. Access to any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month recurring.
-I've seen a current discounted sale membership of $84/year. But with the virus epidemic, affecting porn production, I don't know if an annual membership will have the normal update rate. Because many porn production sites have either shut down or reduced output.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. Which is nice, because many porn sites are starting to charge extra for downloading, or limiting your downloads by the day or month.
-CCBill and Epoch are the main billers, both trusted names. Easy to cancel, usually easy to deal with for a billing problem (except if you get scammed by a pre-checked cross-sale, that is hard to fight).
-Login and member pages are https. Which is nice, because it's less prone to hacking. And your ISP does not keep a record of each page you visit. |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The main strength of the site and network is the models are cute young girls.
-Content is exclusive.
-Easy navigation. This is the way sites should be laid out, where it's easy to search the site's content and access the content. Something the Adult Time network needs to learn, because the Adult Time network is a huge, jumbled mess of some good and not-so-good porn.
CONS(START OF):
-The major con is this is a tiny site. 14 videos + matching photosets.
-A second major con is this is an archivie site. Last update was 2018-10-18.
So the site is tiny, and will not grow.
-So if you are stuck at home, in the stay-at-home order, you can scan and/or download the entire site in less than a day. However, you have the rest of the network to explore, which has a huge number of cute teens in hardcore (and some softcore) scenes and photos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site description (from the site):
When Daddy's Little Angel isn't ready to give up her virginity, he convinces her to let him cum through the backdoor. These taboo teens will do anything to impress their stepdads, even if it means getting their asses stretched with first time anal sex. Watch petite angels earn their wings with hardcore anal and double penetration scenes.
Growing up, I thought that Daddys Lil Angel was the best treat for Daddy. But this site seems to think that anal sex is the way to a Daddys heart and mind. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
The main site in the network is Nubiles.net. This is the jewel of the network, with it's massive collection of young porn stars. Many of the models make an early appearance in their career at Nubiles.net, which is like an encyclopedia of teen porn.
Nubiles Porn network includes:
Mainly teen sites, with a variety of niches: fake stepfamily taboo incest (I assume that showing "real" incest is against the law, or else why are there so many sites that show fake incest and constantly advertise that there is no real blood relation between the models?
Also features MILFs, lesbian, anal sex, etc.
One of the main benefits of watching porn is that it's a learning experience.
You learn how the real world operates.
It also serves to relieve stress.
For example, when you watch the videos at Daddys Lil Angel, you realize that young teens want to be good girls. But they also want to please their daddys.
These are step-daddys, not biological daddys. So it's taboo, but fake taboo. However, since the tender young teen is having sex with her step-father, there is also an element of young-old.
Many of the step-fathers shown at this site seem too young to have step-daughters this old.
But a younger step-father means a guy who has more energy and stamina to satisfy their step-daughters when they start to get it on.
And they do get it on.
Either the step-father is attracted to his lovely step-daughter, or the step-daughter is attracted to her step-father.
And it's the role of the step-father to instruct his daughter in the mysteries of sex.
Because these girls need a sex educational.
Although, to be truthful, many of the girls already seem to have a good idea of how to satisfy a man:
giving a blowjob, licking his cock and balls, having vaginal and anal sex, whatever it takes.
So the girls squeal and moan, and the step-father and step-daughter end up in each other's arms, totally satisfied after a strong sexual workout.
Although the site emphasizes anal sex, the sex formula is mainly a blowjob, then vaginal and then anal sex.
I guess that anal sex is supposed to be more of a taboo than vaginal sex, but all the videos have a blowjob, vaginal and anal sex. Very little of the man going down on the female.
The videos run about 20 to 30 minutes. The videos are clear and crisp, good focus, good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control, good production values.
This is middle of the road porn: not overly harsh or over-the-top. No slapping, hitting, spitting.
Video runtime is around 25 to 30 minutes.
Photosets go up to 180 photos per set.
Videos can be downloaded or streamed in 270p through 1080p.
The streaming player is good: the videos stream smoothly, not stuttering or buffering, no pixellation.
Daddys Lil Girl is plot-driven reality porn. Except the plot is paper thin: and the reality is bullshit. But this is porn, and you shouldn't expect a lot of reality in porn. Porn is basically fantasy.
There can be excellent porn: I think Pure Taboo is an excellent plot-driven porn site, that features strong plots with attractive models (attractive models are always an important element of any porn I might enjoy), and the plots are dark and twisted, with the twisted desires adding to the impact of the porn.
That is not the case with Daddys Lil Darling. The plots are paper-thin, the acting is poor, and the sex is by-the-book scripted, so it's not creative or intense.
The site gets a score of 72.
The pros:
Nice clean videos.
Models are just OK to attractive.
The main value is you get network access to the Nubiles Porn network. If this was a stand-alone site, the score would drop to the 50s.
The cons:
Tiny site. 14 videos.
Archive site. Last update was in 2018.
A listing of the 16 sites included in the Nubiles Porn network is shown in the first reply to this review. |
|
04-24-20 11:04am
Replies (1)
|
Review
199
|
Hot Crazy Mess
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-I want to thank Wraith0711 for posting a comment that Nubile Films now includes 2 bonus sites:
That Sitcom Show and Hot Crazy Mess.
He's one of those detailed-people who examine a site to see what it has to offer.
I wasn't aware that the bonus sites were added, until he posted the comment.
-I should also thank exotics4me for pointing out that the 2 bonus sites added to Nubile Films were probably added around 2-3 months ago.
-PU discount of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $29.98/month.
But there is a yearly price of $99.95.
However, if you join through Nubile Films, they have a current discount of $84/year.
Nubile Films also has a current discount of $14.98 for the first month, recurring at $19.94/month.
So join through Nubile Films, and save a few dollars, if you're going to be around for more than 1 month.
-Login and member pages are https.
-The models are mainly slender white teens, with some black and latina models. There is even at least one Asian model (Lulu Chu). |
| Cons: |
PROS(CONTINUED):
They don't list the nationality of the models. The models are mainly cute to very attractive. A lot of young honey bunnies that are fucking hot.
-These girls are cute to really cute. Lily Rader, Audrey Grace, Alex Blake, Piper June, Riley Star, Britney Light, Dolly Leigh are just a few of the young teens that grace these videos.
-Videos have a plot to set up the sex. But not a lot of thought is really put into the plot. It's really thin. And the models are not really actors. Except some of the models are so cute it doesn't matter: either they are better actors than I thought, or they are so attractive you're looking at their face and body so hard you're not paying much attention to what they're saying.
-The screenshots download in a zip.
-There is a good description of the plot/action for each video.
-You can tag videos with a favorite label, and save them in a favorites group.
-A lot of the models are petite, around 5' or so. That just adds to their cuteness. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS(START OF):
-Small site. 67 videos total. Plus matching photosets for each video.
-Last update was 2020-01-03.
That's a shame, because some of these girls are really cute, and I would love to see even more cute girls added. That's probably the biggest con of the site, no more updates.
-The camera is poor POV. The guy holding the camera does not hold it steady, it can move around, which is distracting and irritating.
They should have hired a professional shoot the video. It would have made a nice improvement.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Very little model information. Age, height, country. figure measurements, that's it.
-The video plot descriptions are very detailed, which is good. But reading the descriptions, you start to see the same plot points being repeated. They run out of fresh ideas, and just use the same stories. But since the girls are so cute, you can more or less ignore the plots, and feast on the girls, who can be sweet and sexy and hot as hell.
-Sometimes when they shoot outdoors, the random noise level can be quite high.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
-Last video posted 2020-01-03.
-67 videos.
-67 matching photosets.
-Video runtime 20 to 30 minutes.
-Videos can be downloaded in definitions from 270 through 1080p.
-Photosets run around 35 photos per set.
-Each photo is 1920x1080px.
They indicate the photos are screen shots, but they are good quality. I assume there is some excellent software that converts a video into a photoset, because the quality of each screenshot is far superior to what the screenshots were from 10 or 15 years ago.
I examine the photos in a photoset, and I couldn't tell they were screenshots. Most of the photos were very nice. I wish a some of the photos per set were slightly more focused, better definition, because some of these girls are really cute, but many of the screenshots look like real photos. And the screenshots are focused on the action, centered, not just random screenshots that have heads or parts of the body randomly cut off out of the photo.
The photosets are worth keeping.
Maybe I'm just tired at looking at the MetArt and other high quality glamour site photosets, but I am getting slightly bored with many of their recent models. Perhaps it's just me. But the girls at this Hot Crazy Mess site were much more appealing, that I even liked their photosets more than what I like at MetArt. Two different types of content: MetArt is mainly young women, late teens or twenties. Strictly softcore. Glamour-style photos. The girls at Hot Crazy Mess at mainly cute teens doing hardcore sex.
The Hot Crazy Mess models are more desirable than the models at MetArt because they generate more heat.
Britney Light, in the video, "Deviant Thoughts - S2:E1", is a cute young teen. 19 years old. Extremely cute. Soft, tender voice. She's so fuckable. Not an elegant way of putting it, but it's the God damn truth. At least in this video, she is hot and wet and luscious. Not like a porn star, but like a sweet young thing you'd like to pound on for a few hours. If you had the strength and endurance.
Porn is fantasy, but that's what this model makes me think. And quite a few other models at this site.
Whereas, many of the models at MetArt, although absolutely gorgeous, have lately left me cold. Maybe I need to take a break from porn, but the girls at Hot Crazy Mess are really attractive, which I appreciate. That I can find something to like a lot.
Kyler Quinn, in a video at the site titled: "Fuck Thy Neighbor - S5:E6", comes across as a sweet young teen (her age is listed as 20) who broke up with her boyfriend who was cheating on her. So she meets a new neighbor and has sex with him as a rebound fuck.
I don't know what it is: the vibes from these videos are like these are sweet young things, who are having problems, and they are using sex to help with the pain. They are sweet, innocent, not sluts, not porn stars (fantasy, again, remember), who just want to share a moment in time with another human being.
I just enjoy the videos a lot. It's a different vibe, a different atmosphere from glamour or heartcore or gonzo, but a reality-based slice of life where the sweet young thing has a problem, and she is having sex to reduce her pain.
I don't know why, but the videos just appeal to me.
(The models are attractive young women, and the videos are well shot--apart from the sometimes jerky POV camera-work.)
Ella Cruz is another adorable teen model.
I mean, this site has a bunch of lovely teen models, that are just fascinating to watch.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
Pros:
-Fine looking, attractive young models. Could be girl next door types, except they are attractive to very attractive. Not porn sluts.
-Excellent video quality, except for the sometimes jerky POV camera-work.
-Nice sets. But when they shoot outdoors, the noise level can be quite high.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN FIRST REPLY: |
|
04-21-20 10:38am
Replies (4)
|
Review
200
|
That Sitcom Show
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-I want to thank PU member Wraith0711 for pointing out in a comment ThatSitComShow and HotCrazyMess are included as bonus sites in a membership with NubilesFilm.
The NubilesFilm site itself doesn't seem to advertise you get the bonus sites, so unless you are sharp-eyed or detail oriented like Wraith0711, you don't see all the content available to you with a membership.
-I joined Nubiles Films in September 2019 for a year-long membership. That's why I am saying I'm been a member of That Sitcom Show for 6-12 months. I'm not sure when they added That Sit Com Show as a bonus site.
-ThatSitcomShow (and Nubiles Films) is currently running a special discount of $84/year.
-You get a bunch of different content options: Video (streaming and downloading), Pics, Screenshots.
-Downloads are offered in 270p through 1080p.
-Streaming quality is 270p through 720p.
-Content is exclusive.
-Streaming and downloading are unlimited.
-Login and member pages are https. |
| Cons: |
-That Sitcom Show's last update was 2019-09-20. So it's an archive site. And with the coronavirus epidemic, it will probably stay an archive site, as the virus shuts down porn production around the world for months or more.
-Small site. Only 44 videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The videos are boring. That's my personal reaction. Maybe other people will find them funny and worth watching, or sexy. Time and money and talent was spent making the the videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
That Sitcom Show features the porn parodies of popular TV shows:
Two Men, Big Bang, Friends With Benefits, Threesome Company, Married With Issues, and a bunch of other TV shows are featured.
I don't watch a lot of regular TV, so I'm not familiar with most (or any) of the TV shows that are being parodied. I won't enjoy the parodies as much as someone who is a regular watcher of those shows. I won't catch the jokes as easily, the jokes will have less meaning for me.
I think the Nubile Films site (that is part of the package of Nubiles Film, That SitCom Show and Hot Crazy Mess) is the star of the 3 sites. Nubiles Films is an outstanding hardcore site, with outstanding models that range from attractive to lovely, and high level videos that are gorgeous to watch: well lit, beautifully filmed.
That SitCom Show is less appealing. It's porn parodies, not my favorite niche.
Since I'm unfamiliar with the TV shows being parodied, I can't appreciate the parodies as much as someone who is familiar with the original content of the TV shows.
I think they put a lot of thought and effort into making a quality product of the parodies.
There is a good audience laugh track for the show, the models (male and female) are actually actors, who do a much better job acting than most porn models. There is a real plot involved in the episodes. The female models are attractive.
One problem watching these parodies: my mind knows these are parodies. So I can't watch them as straight porn, I'm trying to find the humor in the video, since that is what a parody is supposed to be: an exaggerated version of something that has a humorous factor. So the humor gets in the way of reacting to a sex scene.
Do you remember the movie, "Fast Times at Ridgemont High"? The classic scene with Phoebe Cates coming out of the swimming pool in a red bikini. Phoebe Cates, lovely face, fantastic body, she unhooks the top of her bikini and shows her breasts. One of the most iconic sex scenes of the early 1980s. Not much sex, just a fantastic looking girl and brief flash of breasts. But that scene had it all. One of the most beautiful girls of all time, topless, humor and wit. Not a parody, but just a great fucking scene in a very good movie.
I can't appreciate the videos in That Sit Com Shows. I know they are good quality videos: the acting is far superior to the acting of most porn models. The video technical quality is good. The script is good.
I think the problem is that I'm want porn to be hot, arousing. And the scenes don't turn me on. The Phoebe Cates scene in Fast Times at Ridgemont High was shocking. I kept thinking what a fucking gorgeous girl Phoebe Cates is. And the humor and wit were just added bonuses. But the parodies at That Sit Com Shows don't excite my admiration or excitement. They are nicely done, far better than what I was expecting.
But so what? They are not what I'm looking for in porn.
I remember going to New York City in the 1970s and watching Candide on Broadway. Candide was based on a novel by Voltaire and was a satire on Leibniz's philosophy of optimism. The play was enjoyable and exciting. Not porn, but interesting.
The porn parodies are not especially interesting.
Not especially fun.
Maybe if I was a fan of the TV series the videos are based on, they might have more interest and be funnier for me.
But even though I think the porn videos are done very well, they are boring for me.
Bottom Line:
Pros:
They've put a lot of time and effort and talent into making good porn parodies of TV shows.
Login and member pages are https.
The models are surprisingly good actors. The scripts are good.
Cons:
The videos are boring for me.
The site is small. 44 videos.
The site's last update was 2019-09-20.
I'm giving the site a score of 75. |
|
04-20-20 08:25pm
Replies (5)
|
|
