Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best handjob site on the internet and it's not even close.
- Has network access with it, but I scored this site 9 points higher than the network, it's a miring network that takes away from this site.
- Unlike the rest of the network, Mano Job is updating with new content and isn't recycling.
- An unheard of, unmatched, roughly 800 handjob videos.
- Some well-known models and some that I probably just don't know by names.
- Probably internet porn's best tagging system. Will go more into this in BL.
- They experiment with niches by adding CFNM elements to some scenes, and using the various actions that are well-tagged and easy to find.
- Very good download speeds.
- Excellent technical quality on this site with over 700 of those videos having 1080p option. Also pictures with zips if interested in those.
Cons:
- Is it fair to say the network it's on? The main two other sites in the network are recycling, which causes me to think the whole network is recycling. When on the network's hub, you get a mix from the 3 sites so it takes away from the Mano Job content.
- I think its price is a little high, it's fairly unique content and they do it better than anyone, but it's $30.
- There's still a listed but undefined download limit. I really don't believe it's there.
- Really the only real con is the common one. It's a niche site and all scenes are fairly similar, it can and does become boring.
Bottom Line:
I have only scored a site from a network, higher than its network, one time before this. Think it was Nubiles.net. I actually think in this case it's a big difference. The network this site is on has around 1,300 scenes. A little over 800 of those scenes are on this site, Mano Job. I've been told, "You don't have to go to the other sites", it's not the point. If you sell me something as a network, then I have expectations. Because I brought up some rather negative points about the network, I thought it was only right and fair for me to come back and post something more positive about this site. One more part on this, the site Chelci Fox, which isn't advertised as included, but is included as you find out later in your membership, is now fixed and operational. Good job by them to update the certificate or whatever it was that was causing a problem. There's a full explanation in the comment section on that problem.
I think the first big question here is "is Mano Job recycling?" My instinct tells me no. They're updating quite a bit, I think 16 out of the 19 days of December, so far, but these scenes look new. I hate that I'm not as caught up on the current models, but will say one of the December updates if of Roxy Deville, who I do know is retired. It could be something they recorded before she retired and are just now getting around to releasing. Most of the rest of the models aren't familiar to me.
Why would I make such a bold claim as "the best handjob site"? Simple. Handjob sites are notorious for having repeat models, not just a few or the not intended pun of a handful of times, but many handjob sites have about 12-15 women who they use for 100 scenes. I still believe this site is somehow related to Fucked Hard 18 and the models here are very comparable to the models on Fucked Hard 18. Young, some curvy, different races and nearly all are attractive. Which is something you'll also have trouble finding on handjob sites. So, that's part of my reasoning behind "the best".
Then there's the amount of content. There are handjob "networks" that don't have half the amount of content this site has. The oldest scene is from December 2005, so they've been around a long time even though they didn't update much back then...
Which does make me question the recycling possibility. But if they are recycling some old scenes, they are doing so in remastered 1080p.
The tagging system deserves its own section. Handjobs are fairly basic. But as the genre once grew into a popular one, it stopped being the common handjob. Things like Tit-fucking were added. Pussy Tease was added. Butt Tease was added. The out of control, breaking the rules, Oral option was added. The tags might not be 100% right, but they are pretty accurate. I think in a handjob genre, those little tagged niches are very important. It kind of reminds me of lesbian sites that tag every action in a scene, which is a great help. I get tired of watching videos looking for one certain action only to not see it.
And those combined reasons make it the best handjob site.
I think as porn viewers and users (same thing?) get more and more used to common cookie-cutter porn scenes, they'll start looking into handjobs, CFNM, since I'm pretty sure that's what happened to me.
The one part that might surprise potential members are the pictures. Again, the thought going into this content is very good. I really didn't think I would care anything about pictures from a handjob site, but at least 1/3 of the pictures (in downloadable zips) are just of the model before the handjob, teasing, in her regular clothes and that actually adds to the content.
Seeing that the vast majority of the content is available in 1080p helps for those into the technical aspects. The videos also have the 720p option and "web" and "mobile" versions. They also do have a "cumshot" option in the videos. This site, in and of itself is impressive.
I have very little to say about the other sites in the network. You might find something you like on them, but I didn't. The Chelci Fox one has some interesting content that does look fairly old (maybe 2005-2010 era?), but is typical solo girl-type content.
I also think this is a good example of a question that has been asked here on PU. The price does hurt the score. Based on the standards that are used in grading a site, it's very close to a 100, by itself, it does everything it says and they have evolved it with new situations and actions, but the price and inclusion in a network that's not very good, brings the score down a little. I'm doing math there and thinking if it wasn't sold as a network, the price would be cheaper for this one site.
If you're looking for handjob content this is really the only site you need to join. If you're looking for something different than the normal porn, this would be a good alternative to try. Most of the big name models I know of, are on here.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of porn's greatest values and most realistic sites, includes two sites, I'll consider reviewing at least one of them as well since this is packaged as a network.
- Kelly Madison, I think I've made it clear over the years that I don't have a set "type" of model that I like. Kelly is now a very attractive, older model with very large natural boobs and she is a big part of all the content on the network.
- It's not amateur porn, but it kind of is.
- There's not much bullshit here. Hey, that's a pro! They even number their scenes. Well, there was a cross-sale, but I think it doesn't charge, just gives you a free day to another site.
- Excellent quality throughout.
- Good download speeds, about 75% of my max.
- Kelly's husband Ryan is also a big part of the sites and he's not annoying.
- Blurs a line between voyeurism, reality porn, professional studio porn and amateur porn.
- Updates every other day. Video and pictures.
- Above-average variance in model race.
Cons:
- There's a few ads at the bottom of the pages. Not really that noticeable.
- Borrowing a term I've seen the TBP reviewers use, pagination issues. It's because it's a lot of content and really isn't that big of a con.
- I think for some it could come off as too polished. I'm reaching.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to be as honest as possible. I'm trying my best to find a site to give a 100 to. I haven't reviewed this site since 2008 and it's improved a great deal since then. But I couldn't quite go 100. The 3 sites included could easily be standalone sites. I usually join and feel overwhelmed. I'm going to give the across the network numbers and talk about the entire network until I see that it all won't fit in one review. If that happens, I'll review one of the other sites too.
Kelly Madison has been around for awhile. I'm guessing she was a late bloomer. I've seen her listed as 50, if she is, she's taken great care of herself. I guess she's most-known for her 36G natural boobs, sorry if the number is wrong. And despite her boob size she's slender. One of the sites is the one I'm posting this review on, Kelly Madison. It has updates dating back to 2000. There's solo sets, Kelly with other women, Kelly with her husband Ryan and Ryan with other women. You will find sets with neither Ryan or Kelly on them, but the vast majority have one or both in them.
One of the other sites is Teen Fidelity. There are a lot of scenes with Ryan with teen models. I don't know, I think Kelly enjoys it. You will find some scenes without either in them, but again, the majority will have Ryan in them on this site as it seems to be his gift that he received for marrying Kelly.
The other is Porn Fidelity. This goes into threesomes with Kelly and Ryan with another female model. In my pros and cons I said, "It's not amateur porn, but it kind of is." What I mean by that is you will know a lot of these models, but you don't have the typical studio porn clinical feel. It genuinely looks like people enjoying sex.
Just a mention for one of my favorite scenes is of the "new" Amia Miley. I put "new" because I've not seen her like this. Her scene with Ryan is worth a join.
What they do here, in my opinion, is kind of genre-blending. There's exhibitionism as some of the models like to get naked in public as the scene is setting up. There's voyeurism since from what I can tell, Kelly and/or Ryan produce the scenes and watch each other, there's straight b/g scenes, there's threesomes b/g/g, there's g/g scenes and there's solo scenes. They're covering all the bases.
And they get some of the best models in the world, who, in my opinion, look much more comfortable in their scenes on these sites than they do in the big studio scenes.
The complaints are minor. Older scenes of course aren't as good of technical quality. The amount of content and clicks create the "pagination" issue.
Here's some numbers: Kelly Madison - 1,205 scenes, pictures, video and BTS pictures included in most. Porn Fidelity - 719 scenes, pictures, video and BTS pictures in most. Teen Fidelity - 294 scenes, pictures, video and BTS pictures in most.
That's 2,218 scenes.
I did forget one thing that would fall into the pro/con depending on the person. The majority of these scenes are long. Some even go over an hour. The file sizes are going to fill a hard drive up very fast. I download the 720p format and even those can be in the 2GB per video range.
The overall feeling is that this site, if you're into hardcore, could easily be a site you'll find any and everything you're looking for with the one catch, Kelly and Ryan are in most of the scenes.
For me, as much as I like it, I'm not as into hardcore as I know a lot of Porn Users are, but they still do a good job of having the models dressed in normal clothes, stripping, and catering to us that especially like exhibitionism.
I could see joining the network for up to 6 months even. Kelly's enthusiasm is a big plus and well, why wouldn't Ryan be enthusiastic? They have hit on a formula here where over time they've made a name for themselves and the models, I would say 95%, seem to really enjoy the scenes. Despite all my positive talk there's still a few warnings. If the thought of most scenes involving one or both of the same people bothers you then you might not like it as well as I do. They do a good job of mixing in other couples and especially with Porn Fidelity with bringing in other females for both Kelly and Ryan to play with.
The sign-up and cancellation is handled by the site itself and it's as easy as possible. Which is the other part that the deepest critics might notice. This site does everything to make itself seem not professional shot, and it's not, it's just that they have so much experience in the business that they are professionals. I can't imagine anyone not liking or at least enjoying this network. You also get an internet porn history lesson since it started as a solo site, then moved into a threesome/hardcore site, then brought teens in to be with old Ryan, sorry Ryan, it's jealousy. I was actually going to list "Didn't marry Kelly" as a con. Great site overall. One of my all-time favorites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's a network that's not really a network that has one of the internet's top handjob sites in it.
- Includes 3 sites, Mano Job, The Dick Suckers (really, people?) and Mr POV. At least we know they're not using their creative juices for site names. There's also bonus scenes from Amateur Allure and Fucked Hard 18.
- Download speeds are good, 75% of my max.
- Most scenes include pictures and they are downloadable. There's also various options on the videos including "bra busting" clip and "cumshot only".
- Navigation is excellent. Well, kind of, it will make more sense as you read through.
- Mano Job has been around for 10+ years. It was the first handjob site I saw that used the "pussy tease", a very important part for me.
- Rocketgate as biller, I've had no problems with them, but do get annoyed by them remembering me and trying to use my sign-up information from 2012. Cards expire!
- No real ads, some live cams from within the site, no cross-sales.
Cons:
- I'm going to get this one out of the way. Handjob porn isn't for everyone and I'll explain in the BL what it is that I like about it and even for me, it gets very repetitive.
- The damning one, though it's not hurting my score since there's still a lot of content here. They're recycling content and my guess is they have been for awhile. I think some of it might be remastered when they recycle it, but one of the newest scenes is of Aliana Love, who hasn't shot porn since 2014. There will be more in the bottom line.
- Supposed download limit, I tested it as good as I could, downloaded 76 GB in 7 hours, didn't hit a limit, so this isn't so much a con as it is a reminded that they do say they have a download limit.
Bottom Line:
Why would I call a network, a network that's not really a network? Because I was a member of Mano Job way back in 2010 and it included The Dick Suckers and Mr. POV. Finishes the Job is nothing more than a hub that brings all the content of those three sites together. It did wonders for the navigation, but this is pretty much the same thing as joining Mano Job and getting the other two sites with it. I don't know, maybe that's a little questionable since Finishes the Job before signing up looks like another full site to go along with those other three.
What's not questionable is the content count. I was shocked when I first opened the site. They have 31 updates in November 2017, that's more than 1 per day. I hadn't realized Finishes the Job even exists. I was just looking at Mano Job as a join to get some old content I no longer have. This really isn't a negative review as the score shows, but I'm going to show the numbers:
RearAdmiral reviewed this site in 2015 and listed 1,400+ scenes.
Mbaya reviewed this site in 2016 and listed 1,452 scenes.
Xander of TBP reviewed this site in March of 2017 and there was 1,308 scenes.
Here I am in late November 2017, a month that has seen 31 updates in 21 days and the total is 1,266.
Ahem.
Maybe things are a little questionable. I know one scene is recycled, it's one of the newest updates and it's of Aliana Love, who hasn't shot porn since 2014. I'm guessing these sites are also owned by the people who own Fucked Hard 18 and maybe even Amateur Allure too. There's a phantom site Finishes the Job and 200 less scenes than 2015, but I still think it's a very good site.
The navigation is very simple. They've combined the content into one area. Four rows of four scenes per page, 79 pages. Over on the left toolbar you can pick to just see Mano Job site scenes or any of the other sites, including Amateur Allure and Fucked Hard 18.
Handjob porn appealed to me back 10 years ago or so. I saw a handjob scene with Brianna Beach in it. She was already one of the best, most believable porn stars, but that scene pushed her over the top. The enjoyment she showed, the arousal she had, it was bad enough that she was asking for the scene to be a sex scene because she was so turned on. That's what handjob porn offers me. You can watch half or more of these scenes and the models look downright bored. Some even look like they're watching a television off the screen. The other models, they look more aroused and more excited than in even their hardcore scenes.
Mano Job does a good job of this. As mentioned, they were the first to do the pussy tease handjob and it's always fun to watch those because it teases many of the female models more than it is the male. That's very rare in porn. The woman being teased.
It's not going to be possible to say when they started releasing 1080p videos since they're recycling, but I would estimate at least half of the scenes have 1080p, don't hold me to that, but I've went back halfway through the pages and there's still a 1080p option.
That excellent navigation might hurt them even more. It's making it easy to see that they are cram-updating. I remember other sites doing this back a few years ago, they would remove 100 and release them over a month as new.
I still can't help but laugh over the names of the sites, did somebody really say, "The Dick Suckers"? Mano Job is the "star" here and the main draw. There's been mixed reports on the DL limit, Xander mentions in his TBP review that there's no DL Limit, but it does show up in their TOS, it just isn't active from the best I can tell.
Look at this as an archive site. The content is good, even if it's repetitive. Good quality, excellent navigation, little to no ads, no cross sales, it's hard to be too hard on them as being dishonest when they're not taking advantage of multiple cross sales and dozens of ads. If I was going to offer advice it would be to put all the content back on it and just let the content sell itself. Nearly all handjob and CFNM sites have gone under.
And that's how I will recommend it, for those who like handjob content or POV content, I don't particularly care for Mr POV or The Dick Suckers, but the content is typical on those sites. Even though I would recommend it to those who like handjob content, I will only do so on a one-month basis. I won't be back after this month. Which I think is sort of a strength for an archive site. You can get everything you want in a month and know there's no more new content coming out. Last, as far as I can tell, this is exclusive content, but I want to mention again the bonus site content, specifically Fucked Hard 18, the blue room that's used in nearly every Fucked Hard 18 scene is also used occasionally on Mano Job.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- More of a softcore site, but not as soft as it used to be and has some of the prettiest models in the world on it.
- Good handling of signing up, cancelling, as it's part of Met-Art's network and uses the same cancelling method as Met-Art.
- 2-3 updates per week depending on the week, this nearly landed in cons, but will explain in BL.
- Excellent navigation, uses the same or similar site format and style as the other Met-Art sites.
- Very good download speeds, right around 80% of my max which is what I get consistently on Met-Art sites.
- Good for photo collectors! That almost gets two pros just because it's so rare to see these days. I'll further this in BL too.
- Some rare slightly harder than softcore sets of models who are more known for just softcore.
- I think this applies across the Met-Art network sites, everything is high-quality.
Cons:
- So, you like amateur models who aren't glam? This probably isn't the site for you.
- Picture sets can be on the small side, not resolution, but amount of photos in each. And the membership I signed up for is only offering 720p on the videos. Not for sure if there's another level that has higher. If there is, I haven't seen it.
- You might run into a feeling of "seen that, saw that" as you go from scene to scene.
- Could be clearer about the biller. I had a charge on my bank card from this site, but hadn't heard of the biller and thought it was fraudulent.
Bottom Line:
A confession: I have had the biggest crush on Lana Lopez for nearly a decade, also known as, Next Door Lana. I was looking through my old content of her and found a video from her own site that's no longer around. It was branded Holly Randall, so I joined for that very reason. A search on their site said they had more content of her and it's the closest I've seen Lana do to even masturbation (not counting those newer scenes or In The Crack).
Getting that content, including the photo sets too, would have been enough to make me a happy customer. As I looked at Lana's pictures, I decided to go look at some of the other models. Much like the top photo sites, this site has very clear, high-resolution photos that are shot in beautiful locations and settings. They also have quite a few of their models starting out in regular clothes or a bikini. It's becoming a lost art so they get a bonus 5 points for that.
The update schedule threw me off. And I'm still going to say it's a little inconsistent. It doesn't help that I'm a dyslexic American and they use the UK way of listing dates with the day first instead of the month. But there is inconsistency in the updates. The month of October had 10 updates, but there was a no-update period of 5 days in the middle of the month.
Then they released a Halloween set of one of my all-time favorite models Veronica Rodriguez and all was forgiven! Didn't even realize she's still active.
My recommendation of this site would depend on several things. Photos are a big enough part of this site that some updates are just photos. There's some b/g content, but it's not that common. I would estimate 20-25% at most. The majority of the content is solo pretty women masturbating. With a catch, this is common across all sites that have solo masturbation, a lot of it is very mechanical feeling.
Then I stumbled on a set with Gina Valentina in it and all was forgiven! Dear lord, where did they find her? Can I move there? I seriously found a new model to collect. Not for sure how "new" she is, but I hadn't ever seen her and she's the first one I've added to my collecting folder in 2 years. They do something else here that I usually only say about In the Crack, the women here look better here than on other sites. An example is Uma Jolie, who I've considered collecting, but changed my mind, the content here makes her stunning.
That's a big plus here. Even if you prefer amateur models and I'm probably 50/50 now myself, there are some really pretty women on here.
My biggest complaint which was only mentioned a little in the cons is the size of photo sets, same with the videos, they're fairly short. That's one of those "it's not really a con since I'm just wanting more of what I see" but since we don't have on-demand porn subscriptions to request to see more of a set, that's a slight con eventually.
Then I saw Karlee Gray, Aubrey Sinclair and Val Dodds. I'm not going to say it again, but I forgot the cons.
It could be that I'm not joining as many sites these days or it could be that I join sites that don't have these newer models on them, but I found multiple models that I started "collecting" folders for.
Technical quality is very high on photos, not as good on videos.
Pictures are downloadable and newer ones are in the 6000 long end range.
Videos for me have 720p option, 360p option and a mobile option. I joined with a normal membership and don't remember there being an option to join a 1080p version, not that I would have since I prefer 720p, but it's worth mentioning since some of the updates being photo sets will already irritate those who like videos only.
Over 300 models, which I think is a little low and might show that they're selective. Most of the models I've like have multiple photo sets and videos.
Roughly 700 videos and 600 photo sets. I should mention here that Holly Randall is the daughter of Suze Randall, a legendary name in porn. Holly, herself, has sets on here as well. Kind of adds a different feel to it since she also is a photographer on the site.
Which I think leads to how I feel about the site. I think with Holly's direction these models, the photo sets, the videos, have very high tease and "slip" photos like Amia Miley, who I thought was long gone from porn, in a bikini and in one photo the bikini has slid over. There's a lot of that here and it's good for me. They even have a tag for "striptease". Sometimes, doing less is more.
Great site overall, but certainly not for everyone. If you're a video lover, you might still like this site, but the best content, on this site, to me are the pictures. I honestly liked it better than I thought I would since my original reason to join was to just grab the Lana Lopez content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An interesting, hardcore site that features models I've never seen and some older Euro models who I thought were retired.
- Updates weekly. A mention here on navigation since they have separate categories and it can make updates a little confusion. There are new "videos" added weekly though.
- By my count, there's 212 videos as of 10/26/2017.
- Download speeds are very good which was an initial concern, but I am downloading at 80% of max speed.
- And since it has come up before, the videos are downloadable and have options from 144p to 1080p.
- The content is quite unique and might be the biggest pro/selling point, will further this quite a bit in the bottom line.
- Subtitles on the scenes I've watched. There's also the setting to make the site's text in English.
- There's pictures and stills that are downloadable, but this will be in the cons too.
Cons:
- I hate to make this con since I can see they are trying to make things more interesting, but the different channels are confusing. Most sites that have "channels" have different content on them than what's on the main site. Channels here are, "Sex", "Casting", "Hints and Tips", "Documentaries", huh? Those are all porn scenes. A+ for effort, it's unique, but that's going to confuse a lot of people. Seems like Sex Art did something similar.
- The photos and stills, I think pictures would be a major plus on a site like this and they have picture sets with each video, but some have 4 photos in them. Some have 20. Some have 30. The stills are what the word says, screen captures from the videos.
- Last and this is a personal preference one, the women are Italian, European and they, in general, fit in that category of "hard" looking. The best example I've ever known of this look is Mya Diamond. I personally like it. But some won't.
Bottom Line:
I want to start by saying I've seen La Sublime XXX's webmaster asking about new reviews and want to say, I paid for my membership. I won't, however, let that alter my score as I'm going to be as fair as possible since they do seem to be genuine about trying to make a great site.
That's the thing, it's a great site. But there's several "buts". I find the models to be very attractive, but I tend to like models who don't look like they just stepped out of their 18th birthday party. Even the younger models on this site look more like women than say teens. Think Eve Angel when she was 18-19, she was a woman not a teen, at least not by porn standards.
The navigation and how to move about the content is easy to use, very clean, simplistic design, but if you go into "channels", you're going to wonder what in the heck is going on. I could be wrong, but based on looking at each "channel" it looks like they've stopped some of them which is a good idea. One is Backstage, one is Interviews, maybe the funniest is "Hints and Tips". Those are not bad at all. They have one of a woman showing how to squirt. They have one of a woman showing how to give a handjob. That's interesting and unique too. I think maybe Vivid used to do those, but haven't seen anyone doing that in awhile. I would keep those updating. I'm interested to see how many things there actually are! Then they have "Reviews" which is models testing and reviewing sex toys. That's interesting too. They have what looks like a one-shot 7 episode documentary with Priscilla Salerno, who I think is a very attractive model.
Where I think those become confusing is they are included in the regular updates/videos. They also have a "Best of" channel that updates in the regular updates/videos. For me, a one month member, I don't know if those are scenes that were once released just as a regular "video" then re-released as a "best of" and counted as an update? That's why I think the channel part is confusing overall. I counted the scenes the way I would on any site, multiplying the number of columns of updates by how many scenes are in a row. And do know that Interviews, Backstage, are included in those updates. Really, just typing that out made my head hurt.
I don't think they should stop the How To, Best of, but I do think they should stop tagging them as different from Sex Scenes.
The reason I went through all of that is by my count, there's just a little over 200 scenes on the whole site. If they disagree and have a different number, then my number is off because of the multiple unneeded tags/channels.
Moving on to the content: There's content here that I think members would if nothing else, find interesting. By interesting, it could mean sexy, it could mean sensual, it could mean humorous and so on. I'll give an example of a scene I watched earlier. The female model seems completely unimpressed by the male model and you have to know this happens in all porn, but they capture it and have her talking about it. It's bad enough that she's telling the guy to finger her because she's not even wet. By the end of the scene, she's talking about how he was much better than she expected and was making jokes about taking him home with her. There's a realness there. I have family that speak Italian, so I can understand most of it and there's English subtitles. Which is the really strong point to this site. For one of the first times ever, we have non-English speaking porn that has very clear English subtitles. It adds personality to the "foreign" women that we don't usually get to see or should say hear. And don't overlook those "how to" videos, the woman talking and explaining the steps, actually adds an excellent tease/erotic value to those scenes.
A few overall complaints before the technical parts:
The photo sets have to be bigger. Photo collectors are going to be very disappointed when there's 4 pictures from one scene.
Considering there's only one update per week, don't bring those interviews/backstage back, not if they're going to count as an update.
Outside of those, it's a great site. There's around 212 videos. Again, if the number is off, I'm just going from the videos link to count them. There's not a lot of backstage/interviews, maybe 15-20 combined. And while there's women here who I do know, like Simony Diamond, the vast majority are women I've never heard of. That's a big draw for me.
There is a "categories" section, so since I know we have anal lovers, there's around 60 scenes with anal.
The videos are downloadable up to 1080p, I download the 720p and they are very clear, I would go as far as saying excellent clarity. The files are not small. The 720p are right at 5000 bitrate. The 1080p are at 8000 bitrate.
I would recommend it to those who like Italian women especially and for those who like hardcore, but would like to see a little creativity thrown in too. I'll be back in about 6 months. Add more pictures and I'd bump it up to 90.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The upgrade package for Bang Bros, comes with 10 sites and this content, at one time, was stream-only, it's now downloadable.
- I tried joining directly through Dancing Bear, but the price was $29.95. If you're a member of Bang Bros, you add this package of sites for $19.95.
- Nice variety of niches in this package.
- Good download speeds, possibly from not as many members?
- Quite a bit of unique, exclusive content.
- Some fairly rare content if you're interested in certain niches.
- Has a party site, a Latina site, two college girl sites, a busty site, a solo site, an amateur site, a public site and a gameshow type CFNM site.
- Good navigation that's straightforward.
Cons:
- Back to the same problem as Bang Bros. The cancellation process is tucked away in the "library" link. Even worse, if you upgrade your Bang Bros membership to include this package, you now have two Bang Bros memberships listed in the options to cancel so you have to go through and cancel each one.
- None of these sites are updating and haven't been in over 2 years.
- The ads become a major factor once your regular Bang Bros membership has expired. You now can only access about half of the scenes on your browser window unless you want to rejoin Bang Bros.
- And the winner of the "are you fucking kidding me" award, there's another upgrade package! After joining this upgrade, a whole group of sites looking to be associated more with Middle Eastern models, including Mia Khalifa pops up.
Bottom Line:
I joined this upgrade package back when they were first offering it, guess that would have been 2011/2012. This review is going to be a bit back and forth.
The content here goes into unique niches that are rare. The party site, Dancing Bear, is by far the best of this type of content. They must have realized people were tired of bachelorette party theme and started shooting some of these scenes in sorority houses, in offices, and it does add a whole new dimension to the party atmosphere. The other big party site in another network, sticks to club, loud music, upwards of a couple hundred people. The Dancing Bear scenes have maybe 40-50 women tops and the strippers come out one at a time so you don't have a hundred different angles waiting for them to get that one hot amateur-looking woman.
I don't know why, but I love the CFNM Show content. I'm pretty sure I have a crush on the host of it. And she is involved in some of the scenes which makes it even better, but this was a very short-lived site.
College Rules and Haze Her are both very good sites as well. While the basis is a fairly-common one in porn, the girls, the settings, the laughing, giggling, makes both of these sites seem much more genuine than their counterparts on other networks.
There's the Brandi Belle solo site that is above average especially if you like Brandi. She's a very cute college girl in these scenes and it's somewhat setup to make it like she's auditioning the guys.
MyGF is an amateur site. I'd like to say all these are real amateurs, but I'm not positive of it. I noticed one Asian model who looks a lot like London Keyes, but these sets have the unique feel to them thanks to the additions of selfies in pictures, and what does seem like real couples.
Public Invasion is more or less a less risky version of the Kink public site. It's usually just a male/female outside having sex in the grass.
Busty Adventures is another short-lived site and it's what the title says except you know with Bang Bros, the average girl is usually busty, these are models that fall into the heavier/chubbier category.
Culineros is a Latina site that can be very good, but also very confusing. From the looks of it, Bang Bros had a dozen Latina sites they were trying to get started and most of this content isn't marked as Culineros, but it is included.
I saved that one for last because it can be confusing. The site is Culineros, but you'll see content from Sexo in Public, Mi Primer, Por el Chiquito, Tetangas, and this wouldn't be a problem except we all know how Bang Bros operates. Normally, if you download a scene from site that is not named on your membership, you are getting charged.
All the other sites in this package have the right site names on the scenes.
Here's some numbers: Dancing Bear - 128 scenes CFNM Show - 22 scenes
College Rules - 85 scenes
Brandi Belle - 199 scenes Busty Adventures - 156 scenes Haze Her - 54 scenes
MyGF - 179 scenes
Culineros - 450 scenes Public Invasion - 212 scenes
I'll mention here that Culineros, from the best I can tell and I'm dipping deep in my memory, these almost all look amateur Latina models. The content is very similar to what we used to find on Pacino's Adventures and is probably worth a join just for its content if you're into Latina.
I found the Public Invasion content to be rather tame, there's some risky content, but most of it looks like two people having sex in their backyard.
There's a downside here. This content isn't the newest technology, so the video quality can vary, but all the scenes I've looked at have at least a 720p option.
I think the upgrade is one of those that if you're into these niches and genres, you'll easily get your money's worth with a one month membership. I do think it's questionable for anyone looking for the newest resolution and professional camera/video work.
I'll end with the question I had: If you're a member of Bang Bros then add this upgrade, the upgrade does NOT end when your Bang Bros membership ends. You still sign in through Bang Bros, but you only see the sites in this network, which honestly, kind of surprised me. I was mainly joining to add some of the content lost in a hard drive crash, but did download a total of over 200 scenes, which is more than I've downloaded from a site in a long time. Definite recommend, but only one month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network of sites that are making you believe they are leaked/revenge photos and videos, partnered or owned by Reality Kings.
- To my surprise, there's a lot of content here and it's all in good quality.
- There are 7 sites included and all feature younger/college-aged models in most of our college fantasy scenarios.
- Navigation is pretty good. You can jump from one site to another and despite this being "leaked" content, the models are all named and can be found easily.
- Download speeds are sporadic for me, but the lowest I've seen was in the average range for my connection.
- Dare Dorm is here, could have sworn that used to be on Bang Bros, but maybe I'm confusing it with another site and it's downloadable. I do remember at one time the Dare Dorm content was only available as stream.
Cons:
- Well, I thought there was a chance this site has a lot of amateur content on it and some of it might be, but you won't get that feeling when watching the scenes.
- Typical join these days, seems there's multiple areas you do not want to click unless you want to be charged for add-ons. I used a prepaid Visa on it.
- Another typical one, the "network" is broken into different categories with each "site" having its own niche. Updates are sporadic between the sites.
Bottom Line:
If any site ever needed to just drop the network branding and become a standalone site, this is it. I've been a member of Reality Kings for years and have seen the advertisements for this network. I thought I would try it out as something a little different than what I'm used to, but really, it's not any different than what we are all used to.
Reality Kings and any site associated with them, also can say this for Bang Bros, produces some of the best porn for those who like a blend of races in their model list. This network is no different. There's some very good content here, but outside of Dare Dorm, you're not going to find anything that unique or different here than you would from say Reality Kings or Bang Bros.
It's kind of a shame really. I'm not near as up to date on the newer models so I really can't say what percentage of these girls are amateurs. Having said that, I really like the content. I didn't come into this network thinking I would be that disappointed since I knew of the affiliation with Reality Kings.
Here's what you're getting:
GF Leaks - This isn't a site, but is the network hub where you can scan through all the newest updates all the way back to the oldest updates. Black GFs - 297 scenes, but hasn't updated since July, 2017. Crazy Asian GFs - 54 scenes, but hasn't updated since July, 2017. Crazy College GFs - 47 scenes, but hasn't updated since May, 2017. Dare Dorm - 172 scenes, updates once per month. GF Revenge - 483 scenes, updates once per week. Horny Birds - 16 scenes, but hasn't updated since August, 2012.
As you can see, there's really only two sites that are actively updating and they're not updating that often. Going by the GF Leaks page they're averaging about 5-6 updates per month across the network.
This is the thing though, if you're into this content, the older content especially brings in some uniqueness to it. The Dare Dorm content is fairly unique since it's usually more like an orgy and often times it's one guy with four or more women. I think it saves the network as a whole since I've always liked this content.
GF Revenge is just normal porn with the premise thrown in that it's a woman getting revenge on her ex or current boyfriend by recording her cheating on him. It's not bad, but I would call it just average. The other not updating sites are similar to GF Revenge. Maybe they have just started putting everything on GF Revenge?
A mention here for Horny Birds since this content, like Dare Dorm, is fairly unique. There's hardly no content on it, but it's a blend of CFNM, Dare Dorm and the two big "party" sites on other networks. I always thought this content had a lot of potential, but that's usually how it goes. It's still worth grabbing the scenes from it.
There's another site on, I think, Mofos, that does a lot of things that this network does like having the pictures include the woman taking selfies in the mirror. At one time, that type of content appealed to me a lot more than now, so if you're into that, that's another plus for this network.
I think the Dare Dorm and Horny Birds content is as good as you're going to find in this day and age of porn. I think if you're coming into a membership here with the thoughts that you're going to get a bunch of content of real amateurs, you'll be disappointed. If you like CFNM content, it's a nearly-extinct niche, you will like Dare Dorm and Horny Birds. It's almost like I'm doing a balancing act here. I think the good outweighs the bad, but with the low update rate, I probably won't join it again maybe ever, but I don't regret joining it.
***Notice here, the oldest content very much looks like real amateur content that we've all seen plastered all over the internet for years, so if you've seen an older looking porn clip and wondered where it's at, there's a chance it's here. The one I noticed most was "Hugging Sidewalk" I've seen the picture for over a decade. It has a blonde covering her eyes like she's embarrassed and another woman drunk and laying on a sidewalk with her legs spread open. Here's the catch, they have 4 photos from that "scene" and no video.
Everything is here for a good overall site. I just wish it wasn't advertised as amateur. I think if you like Reality Kings and their style of shooting, style of models, you will like this network for one month. You're going to get some fairly unique content that I'm guessing is mostly, if not fully, exclusive and everything on the site works well.
Another note: They use probiller and I've just had too many bad and/or frustrating experiences with them to use anything except a prepaid Visa. I will say here that a lot of sites won't let me use a prepaid Visa, but it looks like the ones that use probiller do allow it.
Good site overall and especially if Dare Dorm and Horny Birds appeals to your taste in porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the original and biggest reality porn networks on the internet.
- For me, Bang Bros has always been about the models. There's all races, curvy, slim, in-between body types.
- By my count, there's 51 sites included in the standard membership.
- One update per day across the network.
- Videos are available in 1080p and on down. If you want 4K it's an extra charge.
- Pictures are also available for each scene and can be downloaded.
- A bonus group of sites can be added to your membership for $19.95 and include Dancing Bear, Dare Dorm, sites that used to cost $19.95 each to add, there looks to be about 25 sites it adds. Well worth it if you like the content as it's pretty unique content.
- Good download speeds for me.
- Navigation will also be in cons, but once you figure it out, it's above average.
- Cancellation has been improved, but only if you know what you're looking for.
Cons:
- I've only had a few cross-sales get me over the years and Bang Bros has done it twice, including this time. I still don't even know where the MyGF cross-sale was, but I received an email telling me I had access to it for 2 days then would be charged. There's 5 points off the score and a middle finger.
- The new navigation, I hadn't been a member in 4 years, is terribly cluttered and confusing. There's ads, there's lots of links that have nothing to do with Bang Bros.
- The cancellation process which I will walk through below to help others out if they run into problems.
- I don't know if this is fair to also list in cons, but one update per day across a network of 53 sites seems a little on the low side.
Bottom Line:
Bang Bros has been one of my favorite networks for well over a decade. This current membership has shown me the typical Bang Bros experience. Some hidden cross-sale got me. Navigation has so many options you're sure to find one that suits you. And there's a ton of very good porn.
One of the biggest reasons I joined Bang Bros this time was to redownload some of my favorite scenes that I lost a few years ago in a hard drive crash. Those older scenes are still there and I'm happy to have them again. I would have joined the add-on package as well, but have been busy and am now more than halfway through my membership and see no reason to spend $20 for a week of access. I might give it a try in a few months.
So, here's what I did when joining Bang Bros. I bought a Visa prepaid digital e-card and used it. It worked fine and even if their tricky cross-sale had kicked in, there was no money left on the card. Take that however you want. I love their content enough to go through that hassle, but don't trust their ethics enough to use my regular credit card.
Once inside, I admit, I was overwhelmed and shocked by the new navigation. Who comes up with these changes? While looking for my old favorite scenes, a little ad came up and asked if I wanted access to the 4K videos, hell no, leave me alone. I still can't tell the difference in 720p and 1080p. These numbers are not going to be exaggerated:
There are 16 options to choose from once on the Bang Bros website. Including, "meet and fuck", "4K Ultra Videos", "Trending", "Free live chat", yeah, like anything on this site is free. What is "trending"? No clue. It just opens up a bunch of scenes. There's even a "Being watched now" section. I don't care what's being watched now or what's trending or about meeting and fucking.
Onto the content: Bang Bros shoots a style of porn I enjoy. It's not for everyone. I like the goofiness of it. In some sort of odd way, it makes me think it's more believable. There's a part of me that believes if a bus rolls up a college girl and offers a ride, she gets in, then accepts money from these strangers to get naked and have sex with the strangers, it's funny. I'll take this goofiness over the sappy heartcore fake love setup any day of the week.
Bang Bros shows 51 sites included in my membership. I went through all 51 sites and 5 are updating on a regular basis. They would say more than that, but there's multiple sites that hadn't updated since 2014-2016 and now have one new scene in 2017. If that's not bad enough, they have multiple sites that covered the same genre.
But and it's a big butt since it's Bang Bros, I can't imagine anyone ever running out of content to download from here. In their defense on the dead sites -- not that I want to defend them -- there's sites like Living with Anna, that's eventual prolific porn star Abella Anderson, in her earliest content, including pre-implants. They have at least a dozen of these types of sites that were once standalone sites that they've bought out and now give members access to. I'm admittedly a big fan of Abella, and this old content of her is some of her best.
***A quick note on cancelling, as dumb as it is, it's very simple, but even I, someone who has been a member many times before, spent 20 minutes trying to figure it out. You have to go "library" which is some sort of hub for the network, mostly an advertising page for the sites you're not getting with your membership. Scroll down to the bottom and there is a cancel link. Once on the cancel page it will ask what site you're cancelling, you click it and click cancel. It's that easy, but why this cancel link isn't on every page continues my thoughts on why I used a prepaid credit card. Here's the other catch on cancelling, if you have joined other sites (like the add-ons) or like me and got caught by the MyGF cross-sale, you have to also cancel it from the dropdown menu. So, in short that little used "library" link over in the left sidebar navigation is the place you'll find the cancel link.
Some more good parts: Latina Rampage is one of my all-time favorite sites and while it hasn't updated in 5 years, all the content is still there. They've also started a new(er) Latina site that is updating, called Colombian Fuck Festival that's very similar to Latina Rampage. That's very much the content that brings me back to Bang Bros. It's a bit hit or miss with most of the sites since they're not updating, but still have loads of archived content.
I would recommend it despite the frustrations and recommend using a prepaid Visa to join. I wouldn't say that if not for them putting the cross-sale on me. Their content to me is still better than 95% of the content I've seen. The amount of genres is almost unbelievable from Gloryhole, Casting, MILF, Teens, all races of women, corny reality-themed porn and whatever else their twisted minds come up with.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Jules Jordan is one of the better-known names in porn as an actor, director, producer.
- High quality site, quite a few 4K videos, numbers in the bottom line.
- Updates 3 times a week, each scene has a video and downloadable photo set.
- Navigation is very good, several ways to find what you're looking for and will go further in BL.
- Download speeds are very good, about 75% of my max.
- Lots of content, over 1,800 scenes as of 9/12/2017
- Typical pornstar-style models, but they're almost all attractive.
- Relatively speaking, the scenes are generally more interesting than your average porn scene these days.
- Nice mixture of races in the female models.
Cons:
- I think this is becoming a theme. The models, while very attractive, are almost interchangeable, as far as their actions, as are the flows of the scenes. This is nitpicking and probably even assumed.
- Would like to see lower pricing, I hadn't been a member here in several years and think based on the average site these days, it's a little overpriced.
Bottom Line:
So, that's the good news, I'm nitpicking the cons. Jules Jordan's site is fairly straightforward, almost like a no-bullshit site. It's porn. It's good. I especially like the use of black models. Which seems to be a hit or miss on most sites.
I do think the price is somewhat offset by the high quality plus high quantity. Here's some numbers:
Just under 300 4K scenes. These also have 1080p, 720p and 360p options.
The number that stands out, even more to me, is right at 1,000 scenes have at least the 1080p option.
Which just means nearly every scene on the site is at least 1080p and the lowest top option I've seen is 720p.
There's always a collector's interest in a site like this since the content is either exclusive or has to be found one by one on multiple sites. One of the categories is "classic porn" and that's where most of my favorites are.
Most of the action is straightforward. They mix it up some with gangbangs, blowbangs, but there's still a formula here.
The navigation might be the best overall part. You can just go to "scenes" and see the scenes listed from the newest ones back. You can also go through "categories" and from what I've seen there are accurate. Which is very rare. You can also search by model from the model list and my preferred method is to search by "movie" so you can skim through the DVDs.
There's quite a bit of anal, booty, big booty, camouflaged booty, booty everywhere.
The nice thing is when you find a DVD series you like and can just go find those without having to look just for the scenes.
I still think you can complain a little about the amount of content, while 1,800+ scenes looks good, it's less than 400 total DVDs. And that does make me complain a little about the price.
On side note, the smaller of content, might be why the site navigates so well, but there's the other side that it's all in a minimum of 720p, most DVD sites can't say that and even fewer can say 1,000+ scenes in 1080p.
Kind of a back and forth experience, it's easy to recommend it since it's as good, if not better than most porn these days and it's very high quality. Decent update schedule and the billing is through Epoch. There was a new strange cross-sale tactic to watch for. There were two cross-sales, one checked, the other wasn't checked. Damn it, I don't want to have to read when signing up for a porn site!
So, overall, it's still a very good site and would be a good place to start building a porn collection as the majority of the DVDs are worth keeping.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A porn network based around massages.
- 8 sites included the network, all 8 are massage-themed.
- 3 to 4 updates per week (across the network) depending on how the days fall.
- Videos have download options from 180p to 1080p, picture sets seem to be screenshots from the video, but can be downloaded in zips.
- Navigation can be good, but can be annoying too, will further in BL.
- Download speeds are above average, about 70% of my max.
- The combination of various niches thanks to the multiple site format helps it not be as repetitive.
Cons:
- It's still repetitive and formulaic.
- Navigation gets a mention here too. Will further in BL.
- Not a big variety in models, most or all are well-known porn stars and some variety in race.
- This goes into the navigation, Members Fantasy site, is listed as a separate site and counted as such, but its content appears on multiple sites on the network. While Fantasy Massage Pilots is also listed as a site, but seems to only be something like a network hub.
Bottom Line:
I like the network. It's formulaic and repetitive, but they do at least try to buildup the scenes. It has terrible acting as expected, but it's at least humorous.
As you can see, 4 of the 8 sites aren't updating anymore and one gets a question mark because it's the same content I get when I go to "all sites". It has Member Fantasy and Nuru scenes showing. So, unless something is just redirecting wrongly there, that's only 3 sites that are updating.
The models are very attractive. Production values are very good for a site in this price range. The girl/girl scenes are my favorites on the network. Those, even when going into oral and tribbing, still have something of a massage theme.
Navigation problems seemed very minor at first, but the further I got into my membership, the more they started annoying me. Here's what happens:
Along the left margin is a list of the sites in the network. You can click on any specific one or you can click on "all sites" and it combines all the sites. Here's the problem, if you click on say, "Nuru Massage", it opens Nuru Massage, you then click on the home button and instead of taking you back to the hub it drops you back in Nuru Massage. You can even click "all sites" and you're dropped back in Nuru Massage. The only way I've figured out to work around this is to click your profile then go back to home and it breaks whatever coding that sends you back to the site you were on. Also, it looks like the "Member Fantasy" scenes are shared among the sites.
That's not a huge problem, but when one of the sites sends me back to the hub (Fantasy Massage Pilots), and the other sites won't send me back to the hub, there's an annoying problem. But still, not that big of a deal.
Overall, I think the network is very good, especially for the price, plus you at least do get a little buildup in the scenes since they have this working massage theme. I've always wondered if porn directors realize some of us like the buildup because it lets us see the women doing something besides sex?
Technical quality is excellent unless you're wanting 4k. I've reviewed several of these networks, all are under the Fame Cash umbrella and all follow very similar designs, standards (180p to 1080p and all between resolutions). These types of sites/networks are becoming very common and kind of remind me of the old DVD sites. Meaning, you get a lot of content for your money, but a lot of it is interchangeable. The advantage is these sites in this network are exclusive, at least to the best of my knowledge they are. It's good, value-priced porn. Not a lot to complain about, but not a lot to get excited about it either.
I would recommend it for porn fans in general. Lots of models, would share a number, but they include males in their model list and have no way to just see females. It's over 500. There's a lot of content overall too, but I can't put a fair number on it since they have one site bouncing me back to the main hub and another (Fantasy Massage) that is shared throughout the network.
Good network overall, but could fix a few problems mentioned and just merge those dead sites to make things a little cleaner and clearer.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A now network that consists of what used to be 4 standalone sites.
- TBP/PU price is very good for the quality and quantity.
- Covers quite a bit of niches with the network access, Hard, Erotica, Dark and Lesbian.
- Nearly 800 scenes across the network. Each scene has a video and photo set. The photo sets started out (older content) very small, 20-30 pictures each set, now in the newer sets they are around 300.
- Network had been updating daily, but just recently, there's a 3-4 day gap without a new update, but there are more updates listed in upcoming.
- Very good download speeds and no DL limits.
- Navigation is about as good as it gets, very clean interface and even with the switch to a network, it's easy and clear how to switch from one site to another.
- Wasn't too sure about the payment processor, OLife through Fame Bill, but it was easy to cancel and canceled immediately with a confirmation email.
Cons:
- Very much a straightforward professional site. Typical hangups here, things feel formulaic and you most likely will know all the models.
- Nearly missed a checked cross-sale at signup. It's over in the right margin area.
- If you're looking for anything beyond normal (2017 standards) porn, it's not here.
Bottom Line:
I had often thought about joining a couple of these sites on their own. Then I saw that it's a network now and decided to go ahead. My first thought, is just my opinion, they made the right decision by making it a network.
Their list of models is quite impressive (around 300), including a "return" of Tori Black, who is a longtime favorite. There's also some Brandi Love content and I know she's one of the more popular women in porn right now.
The technical quality is very good unless you're wanting 4k video. They have 7 resolutions for each video for download, ranging from 160p to 1080p, I think they have every possibility in resolutions in that range. There's no 4k videos that I've seen.
The photo sets started off very small. I was checking some of the older content and some had as few as 25 photos in them. Most of the newer ones are around 300 and they do look to be a mix of photo set style and screenshots from the video. Overall, they're nice pictures that top out at nearly 2000 long end and are downloadable.
The four sites included are Lesbian X, Hard X, Dark X and Erotica X. Lesbian is self-explanatory, hard is hardcore sex, Dark is interracial and Erotica is heartcore, or hardcore just not as physical and plays off romance between the models. It's a good blend since you can switch your moods without having to search through scenes to find what you're looking for.
It's rare these days to here of a network that has near-perfect navigation, but this one has that. When you go to the EmpireX hub, over to your left are the four sites listed by name, you can jump directly to one of those, you can take a chance with their "categories" or model list, but I've found just going from site to site makes it easy to find the content. The best part, no matter where you are on the site, there's a big XEmpire logo you can click on to take you back to the hub. You don't even have to use the browser back button.
As a network, this is a very good deal for the price and would be recommended to anyone who is looking for a variety of porn. I can't say I would recommend it to someone looking for amateur porn. It's very polished here and they've done a good job of finding pornstars who play their roles well. Oh and there's no stories here. Which is really the only complaint I have with the site. It's very formulaic. Having said that, a lot of the porn these days is that way too. Not that I'm accepting it, but it's not changing for the time being.
Recommended for a month join. I personally preferred Lesbian X, lots of tribbing and strap-ons. Would rate it highest of the 4 sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large site dedicated to "exotic" women, a classification that is mostly based on ethnicity.
- These are typically my favorite models, if my screenname didn't give that way.
- The site updates a lot, but there's no way to put a specific number on them, it is daily and it's multiple updates per day. Will further this in BL.
- I think this is a pro for me, a lot of these models are very much amateurs and the ones who went on to be big name pornstars, have some of their earliest sets here.
- The models aren't overly made-up, it's not really a glam site at all and most are in very normal everyday clothing.
- Technical quality on newer sets is good, but there is a dropoff as you go further back into the catalog.
- Navigation is very good, these ATK sites have streamlined and cleaned things up, one of the easier sites to navigate.
- CCBill as biller
- I would say this is one of the last sites that focuses both on photos and videos.
Cons:
- As good as the navigation is, things can be a bit wonky. Never knew wonky was a word until the last year of reviewing. What I mean by wonky is gallery thumbnails don't always line up, kind of reminds me of when websites were loaded in frames. It's nothing major, just something I notice.
- It's a similar story to most older sites that are still around, the older content interests me more than the newer. That's a subjective one.
- Not enough video options, newer videos have the 1080p option then the next step down is 480p.
Bottom Line:
ATK Exotics has been a favorite of mine for a very long time, but things feel a bit stale in 2017. I should note that I also said the same thing about Nubiles, which is also a great site just like the ATK sites are. So, that stale feeling might very well just be me.
There's only one real premise here. Mostly young, somewhat innocent, any race that's not white, though there are white models on the site. You'll be hard-pressed to find a site with this many mostly amateur black models. There's also plenty of Asian and Hispanic models too. There's a smaller amount of Middle Eastern and Filipino, I'm only separating Filipino from Asian because a Filipino friend tells me she's not Asian, but instead, Pacific Islander.
The photo sets are a big draw here. They are downloadable in 3 sizes, with the biggest size topping out at 3000 long end. You're going to get more photo sets than videos too. To kind of give you an idea of how much they're updating:
Today is 8/6/2017, today's updates have been posted and so far in August they have added 20 photo sets and 6 videos. So they are averaging a video and roughly 3 photo sets per day, which is very impressive.
The videos are good, but you shouldn't expect pro-level performances. It's very clear that some of the models are shy. The HD videos are 1080p at 6000 bitrate. They look nice enough, but there's no 720p option so you either download the 1080p version or drop all the way to 480p.
I think this site excels in bringing early content of eventual stars. Probably the best example of this is Jynx Maze. She has 20 photo sets here, all 20 sets are from 2010, just before Jynx became one of the most popular and prolific models of the 2011-current era. She's in light makeup, wearing normal clothes and even shows an innocence that you'll rarely see in her later hardcore work. But she's far from the only one, there's dozens of eventual stars who have early photo sets here.
I'm not for sure how much this will be taken as a compliment, but with the surge of casting couch sites, that's kind of what ATK Exotics reminds me of. Which makes for a unique experience since you've probably seen the more known models in much more hardcore content than you'll see here. Making it good for collectors of specific models.
The somewhat silly and politically incorrect tags can still be found when you go to the photos section. Like "ghetto" which is almost all black girls who aren't exactly prototypical "pretty". Then one we've joked about before "dime pieces". I've got two younger nephews who say no one uses that slang anymore. There are side pieces and main pieces now. So, I'm guessing they could change "ghetto" to side pieces and "dime pieces" to main pieces. Just having a little fun there.
I should add that it's not all just solo. There's some girl/girl content and boy/girl too, both in videos and photos. One of my favorites on here is Aliana Love, she has some pretty good hardcore sets on here.
As good as the navigation is, you'll be doing a lot of clicking. Go to model list, click the first letter of the model's name, opens up a page of 10-12 models, click again to see the next 12, click again to see the next 12. I'm starting to think sites shouldn't be punished for this since it shows how much quantity they have, but it can get tiresome.
Maybe my current favorite part are the Pacific Islander models, a little bit of an Asian look, but usually with a fuller build than Asian models have. Also, will mention, there are models of nearly all sizes here. Not for sure any would fall under BBW, but there's quite a few "thick" models.
Overall though, the site is very good at what it does and it updates a lot, relative to other sites in 2017. It's recommended for collectors and/or anyone who likes seeing models of different races.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network of multiple models, with multiple concepts going on, including 5 live cam shows per week and a huge archive of downloadable videos of previous live shows and pictures too.
- This seems crazy to me, but by my count, there's 1,267 models on this site.
- Navigation is pretty good, but it has its wonky times too.
- Lots of download/resolution options, though most are very large, will detail in bottom line.
- Well above-average download speeds, around 80% of my max.
- Updates often, by my count, they average 1 or more videos per day, some days I've seen 3 new ones, others have none, but about 30-35 per month. You also get photosets with most of the videos to download and screencaps too.
- Technical quality is very high, with pictures being available up to 5700 long end and videos that go as high as 1080p with 20mbps+ bitrates.
- Surprising blend of models, race, body type, though you're not going to find any BBW models here.
Cons:
- Site can be a bit slow to navigate. That's a nitpick.
- Have yet to catch one of the live shows when it's live, but that's more my job's fault than the site's fault.
- Older content of course drops in technical quality.
Bottom Line:
This site caught me completely off-guard. I hate to name drop other sites, but it reminds me of what Twisty's used to be. Plus they have live cam shows everyday of the week.
I'm going to try my best to explain how the site works since it's a little different than the sites we're used to:
From the homepage you can see the next 5 live shows, including who the model will be and what time/day it will be live. If you're like me, you'll have trouble catching these live. They are live at 5 PM PST, which is 2 PM in my time zone. There's also options to click on "updates", "models" and "sites and niches". Lets focus on sites and niches, there's 27 sites, these are mostly individual model-focused like Aaliyah Love for example. There's upwards of 100 videos of some of these individual models. So be sure to check those if you're a collector of certain models.
Then you go back to the Cherry Pimps homepage and click on updates, this is where a mix of models will show up by dates added. You can sort by most popular and newest. Once in this updates section you also have the option of selecting a "category" like solo, lesbian, etc...
I have to say, I'm very impressed by all of this. Things get better if you're into high technical quality. I do wonder if maybe it's a bit of overkill, but for example, a newer video has these video options:
MP4 1080p, WMV 960, MP4 720p, FLV 856, then several other smaller, mobile options.
On other newer scenes they touch on the overkill:
MP4 1080p 20mbps, MP4 1080p 15mbps, MP4 1080p 10mbps, MP4 720p, MP4 480p and MP4 360p. They're not leaving much room for complainers. Unless you're looking for 4k.
Over on the pictures side of things. They have zip downloads in high/low/med options and screencaps too. The high pictures are nearly 6000 long end.
The numbers then come in:
Nearly 6,000 videos
Nearly 6,000 photo sets
Nearly 1,300 models
About halfway through my membership, I realized something, I've been a member of this network in the past. I joined through Aaliyah Love's site and was mostly just interested in her content so I'm guessing I didn't take a look at the network as a whole or I wouldn't be so surprised now.
Much like the earlier mention of the site reminding me of the great-era of Twistys, Cherry Pimps has a Cherry of the Month instead of a Treat of the Month. That was always one of my favorite parts with Twistys and it's now a favorite here at Cherry Pimps.
There's plenty of solo action, g/g and b/g hardcore. It doesn't look like they've forgot anything unless and this is a big unless ... you don't like mainstream porn stars. I don't watch many newer porn DVDs, so I'm not completely up to date on who the big stars are these days, but the vast majority of these models are ones I've either seen or heard of. Even so, I think with all the quality they have, the amount of updates, the live shows, the good navigation, amount of content, it's really impressive.
One thing I didn't put in the cons is there are a few dead links scattered throughout, like Melissa Martinez's site which is a dead link. The older content I've looked at, like Mason Storm, one of my all-time favorites, still has the 720p option, so it's not a huge dropoff in quality for someone like me since I'm still just downloading the 720p option even when there's a 1080p option.
A note on those very high bitrate scenes. The 20mbps 1080p scenes are between 8 GB and 10 GB each. I'm sure those are great for some people, but I don't fool with those.
I would compare this network very favorably to current Brazzers, Reality Kings, with the added bonus of the live shows and archived versions of the previous live scenes/shows.
It's always nice to see a blend of models and you're getting that here. I'm going to say nearly all of these models are American models, so you do have the tattoos and implants, but you're also getting white, Asian, black, Hispanic and Middle-Eastern models.
Should have put it in the pros that the billing is through Epoch and you also can pay with Paypal. The nitpick complaints, the site loads 20 scenes per page, so it can be a little slow on page switches. One that annoys me a lot, but might not others, if you click to download, it pops a link up to right click and save as instead of downloading automatically, even though the videos do start playing as soon as you click on the scene. Which as we all know can be both annoying and startling. These are all minor things though. The technical quality, the amount of content, the diversity of models, the live shows, the amount of updates, guarantees I'll be back again in a few months.
Very impressed overall and would recommend it to anyone who isn't looking for amateur models. Oh and picture sets are also very good. All I've looked at and downloaded start with the model fully dressed and end fully nude. Some are small sets, as few as 40 photos, others have over 200. Hard to believe, in 2017, that a site is improving itself.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very good site/network of "amateur" content.
- Navigation is surprisingly good, there's a lot of content, but all can be accessed from the toolbar at the top of the Net Video Girls site.
- There's multiple "sites" included: Net Video Girls, Backroom Casting Couch, Exploited College Girls, Black Ambush, Casting Couch HD and Broke Model.
- Some of the sites include picture sets that are downloadable as zips ... but there's a con involved here.
- Download speeds are extremely fast for me, hitting right at 90% of my max download speed consistently, the average porn site downloads at 50% of my max speed.
- Nice diversity in models, both in body type and race.
- Have liked it enough to let it recur for a second month.
- There are weekly updates. Though, these vary by site. But overall there are new scenes across the network.
- Another that will border on pro/con depending on the user, some of the videos are very long. I've seen as long as 93 minutes.
Cons:
- The biggest con is the inconsistencies. Some of the sites have filenames that name the model, other ones have the name of the site and nothing else. Some of the sites have picture sets that you can download in zips. Other ones don't even have pictures you can view. Some of the sites have dates on the content. Other ones don't. These are minor and common annoyances, but annoyances nonetheless.
- I'm having video resolution inconsistencies, but maybe it's because I'm downloading some of the older videos and they just have them listed as "HD"? One of the ones I downloaded as HD was 768x432 resolution.
- No pictures on the Net Video Girls site.
Bottom Line:
I'll start by saying I really like this site or network of sites however you see that. The majority of these models look like real amateurs, some chubby, some slim, some in-between, and there's a good variety of races as well.
I really don't like that Net Video Girls doesn't have pictures. Several of the other sites do have downloadable picture sets. Then there's the inconsistencies, I don't have enough knowledge of computer programming to know why a non-HD video would be listed under HD, but it's not that big of a deal. I consider as low as 720p to be HD. Their newer videos also have 4k option, so they're putting out high technical quality content overall. It's just their older content is worth looking into too and that seems to be where the inconsistencies show up.
The length of the videos and size of videos also varies greatly. I've dowloaded scenes as large as 2.5GB and as mentioned above, as long as 93 minutes. I'm not complaining about that. It just should be known that the videos can be very long considering it's one scene.
There is a more natural feel to this site than most amateur sites, like the really long scenes, compared to some that are only 20-30 minutes. That makes the scenes more believable to me. Some of the models seem to really enjoy teasing as well, which is why I don't understand the absence of pictures on Net Video Girls.
The amount of content you receive with the site and the network is impressive. I would say it's the largest amateur site I've been on. They're not doing any favors though on content count or exact numbers. Each year (dating back to 2000-01) has a list of calendar girls, most of the earlier years it was 12 per year, but over the last few years there's been more than 16 per year. That's just on Net Video Girls. Then Casting Couch HD has a similar setup back to 2013 and no set number per year, but there's more than 12. A little cleaning up would help these sites.
But the overall picture here is there's a lot of content between the seven sites they list in their network.
Luckily, the navigation lets you move from one site to the next and a model list and there's those fast download speeds to mention. I've seen a few known porn stars, but most of these models are genuine amateurs. You also find something fairly rare here and that's two amateur models in a scene together (girl/girl).
The filename problems seem to just be on Net Video Girls, where all the scenes I've downloaded are named netvideogirls(dot)hd(dot)mp4. So, you'll need to either manually rename them to the model's name or let your computer rename them to netvideosgirls(2) and so on. I've just renamed them to the model's name since one amateur site I was on recently didn't even give you a model name. This one at least does that.
I would recommend it to anyone who likes the casting, amateur-type site, it has a lot of content, good technical quality and the good blend of model types. And if it shows my own enjoyment of it, I let it recur and have been a member for nearly two months now. Just be warned of the inconsistencies listed above.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very good site that at least tries to add taboo.
- Easy to navigate as long as you don't mind scrolling.
- 113 scenes as of 7/4/2017
- Each scene has a video and picture set with it.
- Billing through Epoch
- As unbelievably believable as this niche gets, which means not very, but they do a good enough job at it.
- Good price through TBP/PU even if it's a small site. (Edit: Must have been some kind of promo through PU, was under $10 when I joined, now is showing $17, still worth a month join)
- Production values are high here and there's a story with every scene.
Cons:
- There's a reason few porn stars become mainstream actresses.
- Could have more video size options, will further in BL.
- It's not a very big site and it's only updating once a week.
Bottom Line:
The step-brother/sister/mom/dad niche is what you're going to get here. I'll admit, there's just enough taboo here to give the scenes at least a feeling of "it could be real".
As strange as this will sound, I have tried watching scenes in the niche with the sound off. It lets me focus on the actions/expressions and that, often more than the words, shows how believable these types of scenes are. Cliched hair-twirling by the younger female models, outfits that look like they were made for much younger models, etc...
Still, I have trouble believing anyone who joins this site is doing so with the belief that these are relatives, even if just by marriage.
Having said that, Family Strokes at least does a good job of setting the story up, giving it a different scenario, setting and if you tap into your imagination enough it at least is believable enough. Beyond that, you have porn that reminds me a lot of the porn from the mid 90s to early 2000s. Back when porn was as cliche as possible, but was at least entertaining (not including sex).
They offer three video sizes, 1080p, 540p and 360p. As others have mentioned, it would be nice if they added a 720p option.
They also offer picture sets with each scene that are dowloadable, maxing out at 1600 long end, these photos are pretty good. Plenty of teasing in them.
The downsides aren't that bad. The size of the site and update schedule will most likely mean you'll only to join once a year and download whatever new content you want. There's just over 100 scenes right now, it would be a good site for them to repackage into some kind of network, but at under $20, I do think it's at least worth that as a one month join.
Would like to see them have more of the threesome type scenes where one member watches, as those are the best, at least for me. I really like the site's potential and production values, there's at least a story to follow. I like it well enough to rate it an 88, mainly because I intend to download and keep all the scenes from it.
Beyond those who are into the step-family member niche, I think those into voyeurism also would like some of these scenes and those into porn with any kind of plot at all, would as well.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very realistic and believable amateur site.
- Really pretty women considering the nature of the site, also see a blend of races and shapes.
- Videos are clear, but have to go premium to get the 1080p videos, my membership came with 720p as the top option. Which is fine with me.
- Download speed is above average, the newer releases seem to take a little longer to download.
- The scenes are generally long (40-50 minutes).
- Bonus access to Girls Do Toys, BTS content and interviews.
- From the best I can tell they update weekly, this leads into the cons that others have pointed out too.
Cons:
- What the hell is going on with this site's navigation? I'm glad I was OCD before joining it, otherwise, it would have made me OCD. I'll go more into this in the bottom line.
- No pictures? If there are pictures I can't find them.
- Premium upgrade for the 1080p, I honestly wish sites would just remove that option since it makes me feel like I'm missing out on something. Hey, blame the OCD from the navigation!
Bottom Line:
Okay, I really like this site. It's repetitive, but the models are the draw. I don't recognize hardly any of these women from other sites or from DVDs, there could be some though. I don't mind the silly premium upgrade part, it's just I don't understand why sites are going to it. I will be really frustrated if I find out there are pictures if you upgrade, otherwise, they lose 5 points for no pictures. What's the point of amateur girls if you don't show them in their regular clothes and have a little tease?
This site's navigation isn't the worst I've seen, but it's confusing. When you click a scene to download or stream, 12 more scenes pop up directly under the streaming video. It reminds me of the scene cutter Videobox uses except the content is just other models. There's no names on the models. The filenames are numbers. Give me some organization please. There's no model list since there's no model names. Do they maybe have multiple scenes of certain models or no?
Having said that, that's all that's wrong with this site. It's a lot since I now have a folder with a bunch of unidentifiable files in it, but the content is very good. It's slightly irritating since I'm not the first person who has complained, which means they most likely have no plans to correct it.
Instead of something easy and logical, you'll find 33 pages of videos with 12 models per page, unless you look through them from the main page where you'll find 49 pages of 8 models. Jeez.
Back to the models, late teens, early 20s, skinny, athletic, well-built (butts and boobs), white, black, mixed, Asian, Hispanic, it's a dream come true for someone like me. Of course I could say I want to see some more built models and maybe some slightly heavier ones, but overall, these models are what I like. Now, if I just knew their names so I could find them when I'm looking through the folder of numbered files.
I don't know if my score is that fair. I know I generally rate higher, but a lot of that is based on my own problems with understanding the difference between a 50 and a 70. I'm rating it above average for me just because of the models. The amateur aspect does bring in some of those scenes where it's way too clear that the model is just there for the money, not to enjoy the sex. And while I'll agree and understand that, it does hurt some of the appeal.
With all the navigation issues, I'd still recommend it for a month, if you like amateur models, you'll probably love this site, would go another 10 points on the score if they did something with the navigation, model names and added photos.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- High production values interracial site.
- Updates twice a week, has 222 total updates as of 6/13/2017.
- Good download speeds and it's needed since the videos are large.
- Some good creativity in the scenes, but does tend to lean towards the interracial stereotypical porn.
- Much like Tushy, the models here are nearly all top-level in looks.
- Scenes at least do have some story to them.
Cons:
- No idea what's going on with their navigation, but it's really annoying. I click a scene to download, my ability to use the back browser button goes away, so I have to go back to "videos" and scroll through until I find my place.
- Maybe it's just me, but I expected to see some scenarios different from cuckold and cheating wife.
- Also much like Tushy, the scenes don't have a lot of oomph factor.
- Maybe my biggest complaint, quit having the models looking at the camera during sex!
Bottom Line:
A lot of cons for an 85 site, but some of those cons are personal ones that might not bother anyone else. I'll go into that last one, at least half of the scenes I've watched, the model in the middle of sex, is looking back at the camera. I understand that they're very pretty models and all, but are they having sex or posing for pictures?
The action is fairly repetitive throughout. It's not bad by no means, but you'll be able to predict what's going to happen next. Cuckold and cheating wife interracial porn. And now my back button no longer works on their site.
Okay, I've complained enough. This content is good, the technical quality is very good and the models really are some of the prettiest models I've seen. I do enjoy the little stories, usually spoken (assuming) by the model, which always adds some sexiness to it.
There's quite a bit of content here too. By my count, 222 scenes (photos and video with each) and the photos are professional quality, which can be a negative or positive depending on which you prefer.
I'm going to be blunt in saying I won't join either Blacked or Tushy again. I think the content is bland overall.
Still, Blacked serves a niche. Really pretty models doing interracial. This used to be fairly uncommon in porn. The navigation of the site is just fine. You can scroll through or search by model or by tags. But maybe it's my browser, clicking to download a scene removes my back browser button option. That's a real pain which definitely doesn't help my feelings towards the site.
This is one of those sites that I think newer porn fans will like. It has the high technical quality, the videos are sharp and crisp. The pictures look like they came out of a high-end porn magazine. But as with Tushy, it looks like every scene is shot in the same location. Would it really be that much trouble to walk out of the balcony of the bedroom?
I would recommend it at least for a one month join, especially for interracial fans, but nothing more than a month. They update twice per week, which isn't bad by most standards. Still, I would like to see them combine Tushy, Blacked and Vixen. As it is there's just not a lot of value for the price. If they combined the three then I would be much more positive. As it is, watch a preview or two before joining.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A high-production values site that specializes in anal.
- If you're looking for high-quality, this is the site for you. Of the 140 scenes available, around 60 are available in 4k, they also offer 1080p on all scenes and have smaller resolutions as well.
- Every scene has a downloadable photo set, pictures are 3000 long end.
- Updates every 5-6 days.
- Top-tier models, almost look like women who shouldn't be in porn.
- Above-average download speeds and no limits that I know of.
Cons:
- This one is the really only true con, but I'll split it. First, the content is repetitive.
- The scenery, setting rarely changes.
- If you watch a few scenes in a row, you're going to realize you're watching a staged porn scene.
Bottom Line:
I had heard a lot about Tushy/Blacked/Vixen, but hadn't been a member of any of them. It's obvious this isn't a site or studio that's trying to churn out quantity over quality. The scenes on here are fairly straightforward. There's a little talking, usually from the female model, leading into the scene, but it almost always revolves around sex or fantasies.
You can't complain about the technical quality or even the sex. The sex is believable, all involved seem to enjoy themselves. The scenes are typically longer than many sites, most I've watched are over 40 minutes.
I now have a 4k television/monitor (got it more for PS4 Pro). The 4k scenes are crystal clear, but I still just download the 720p ones to keep. Which is a strength at Tushy, I'll download and keep all of these scenes. Production values have always played a part in my interest in porn and they do those well.
Which is also a bit of a negative, but not worth a con, there's not a lot of content here. What it's going to amount to is if 140 scenes is more than you would usually download and keep from a site with 10,000 scenes. If so, this site is a very good deal.
I would like to see more variety in the location(s). I've had this problem before with sites like FuckedHard18 and X-Art. The site itself kind of reminds me of X-Art.
Navigation is clear and easy. The numbers as of 5/29/2017:
106 models
139 scenes (videos and pictures)
And all scenes include anal. I'm back and forth on anal, but most of these models look like they enjoy it and nothing comes across as forced. Which might be the biggest selling point here. These models look like models, seeing them do anal and enjoying it has to be a fetish of some sorts. I do think they could stand to add a few more models with bigger butts, not Reality Kings-type, but curvier models.
Still this is high-quality porn, no matter what my negative points are, it has enough story to keep you interested if you into the story and there's seduction with having the models talk about their fantasies and thoughts out loud. My only concern would be how long it can last without changing some of the scenes? The update pace is good enough, but after downloading these current 140 scenes, there will only be 70 or so new scenes over the next year. I think if they're going to charge that premium price they need to combine this site with Blacked and Vixen.
Would recommend it to anyone who hasn't been a member, especially those who want 4k.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Not only one of the first sites/networks I ever joined, but was at one time, my favorite.
- Enough content to keep anyone busy, easily one of the largest sites on the internet.
- The models. Especially if you like glam models.
- Once easy to use navigation is now more complicated by the "network" concept, but it's still usable and works well once you figure it out.
- Download speeds are average.
Cons:
- Joining and canceling is typical MindGeek nonsense. They moved pre-checked sales lower down the screen and replaced them with what you're paying today, so it takes a scroll to see the pre-checked ones. Canceling doesn't send a receipt email.
- Those "average" download speeds have dropped as low as 50% below my average at times, but have also been as high as 50% higher than my average at other times.
- The site/network no longer has any character or uniqueness to it, something it used to be known for.
- Costs extra to download
Bottom Line:
There was a time when I would join Twistys for one year and be completely satisfied with it. I joined this time on 4/29/2017 and can say, I haven't been on the site since 5/10.
The content isn't really the problem. Very pretty models. It's just that it's no different than what you're going to find anywhere else or for that matter, on a DVD site. It's easy to blame the dropoff of Twistys on MindGeek now owning it, but that's not the only problem.
The quality, if you pay extra for downloads, is very good. There's HD videos dating back 7-8 years, photos are zipped, technically it's as good as it always was.
The insistence of making it a network is silly. I know that the old owner Shap tried the network concept, but never pushed it the way it's being pushed now. The old style was as simple as clicking on a "site" which the name told the genre of. Now, the scenes are dropped into a hub and you have to trust their judgement of what is Hard, Lesbian, Solo, hopefully the love of networks will try to navigate its way out of that mess and get lost.
I still think it's a good site, especially for new or newer members. The older content, 2007-2011, is very good, maybe not the highest technical quality, but there was more oomph to the content. If you like interviews, the old interviews on here are some of the best. If you like solo, the older solo videos are as good as anyone's. It's that newer content that's a problem.
Guy walks in, girl gets naked, sex, scene over. If I can find any positives about the newer content it is in some of the solo scenes. The hardcore scenes feel like Brazzers Light. I really don't think the newer good solo scenes are that much better, I think it all depends on the models.
Also, if you're a past fan of Twisty's pictures, they're still good. Somehow, they didn't mess with the lighting/coolness Twisty's pictures are known for and that includes newer picture sets as well.
If you're new to Twistys or just going back to get some old favorites, you'll like it well enough, but if you're a longtime member and have a hard drive stash of the old content, I don't recommend it, not even for a month.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Reality Kings network and the biggest reason I return.
- A fairly popular niche these days and Reality Kings seem to put more production values in these scenes than any of their others.
- Good download speeds, about 80% of my max.
- Updates twice per month, could be more frequent, but it's not bad.
- 1080p option on all 122 scenes.
- Taking us back to these days of requiring some imagination.
Cons:
- As with the niche sites on networks, it will probably end sooner than later.
- If you're in it for the acting ability, you're going to be disappointed.
- Scenarios want to become boring
Bottom Line:
This is a fairly simple site on Reality Kings. There's not a whole lot of difference from scene to scene, but it's some of best porn being shot these days.
The premise is stepmom/aunt/stepsister catches younger sister/stepdaughter having sex with a man and joins in. These scenes are not believable. There's one where the stepmom is using the toilet while the stepdaughter is having sex in the shower, in the same room. But if you use your imagination some and enjoy voyeurism, there are some very good scenes.
A lot of what I like are the scenes where the stepmother doesn't just "stumble" up and catch them having sex. It's more like she's watching them before joining in. That's enjoyable to me. I like seeing the older models masturbating while watching. On top of that, the models on this site are almost always top-tier models.
While the two updates per month could be higher, it's better than none and each scene has pictures and videos. I once talked about the value of porn being to me, how many scenes do I keep from a site. As of today, 5/16/2017, I have every scene from this site stored on my hard drive and don't intend to delete any of them. I know that each of the other big American networks also have sites similar to this one, but Reality Kings, is adding more with their range of models.
Also helps to keep a sense of humor when watching these. You're going to see some flashbacks to 90s porn when models made over-expressive faces to help build the story, even though the over-expressiveness is what started hurting porn in the 90s. Kind of strange even. Seems like it was Reality Kings and a few others that first brought "reality porn" into the mainstream to be more believable, but now they're returning to the very style of porn they pushed out.
I would join just this site which adds a lot of value when you add the network in with. Would recommend it to anyone who likes MILF porn, voyeurism or misses 90s porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that doesn't do a lot of things, but does the things it does, better than any other site.
- Updates 3 times per week and the back catalog is older than 10 years.
- Feels like they're selling me a house, the locations, colors, brightness, contrast, are all exactly how I like them.
- New pricing plan, which I'll go into in the bottom line.
- In my opinion, the best photosets available.
- Videos are very good, but are sometimes gynecological.
- Every model on here looks better here than on any other site.
- 100% exclusive content.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Navigation is good as soon as you figure out "collections" means models.
Cons:
- A blunt one, it can become redundant.
- Another blunt one, some of the older videos have various problems, audio, video clarity, etc...
- Though in the pros, it has a con to it, the new pricing system
Bottom Line:
There's really not much to find wrong with In The Crack. Though I can completely understand those who don't like the extreme closeups.
It would be hard to pick out even one model who isn't worth checking out. The photosets are shot in a very realistic style, almost all sets start with the model fully clothed with plenty of clothing teases, up skirts, up shorts, panties sliding over and so on. Which is where there's a sharp contrast in the content. The later content in each set is the complete opposite. There's no teasing, it's up-close, in-your-face nudity. Fairly extreme or hardcore masturbation, if that's possible, and it's shot professionally.
This is one of the few sites I'll talk about having production values and great locations. It's like they dropped each model into a perfect environment. It's hard to believe this is a porn review. The woman's clothes often blends perfectly with the backgrounds (beaches, houses).
The new(er) pricing system allows a cheaper membership for those who don't download anything over 720p, it's $24.95/mo. and is perfect for me. Not that it's a huge difference, but I used to pay $34.95 for the site and only download the 720p versions of the videos.
They have multiple options including streaming only video, which also makes the site more accessible to those who are interested, but don't want to pay the premium price.
The main con of the site is you can and probably will get a little bored with it. It isn't because the content is boring, it's that the content is very similar from scene to scene.
The other con about audio and video issues is just based on maybe 8-12 scenes from the earliest years of the site (early 2000s).
Then there's the new pricing system's one con. It's $24.95 for 720p max download videos, BUT you cannot download the photo sets. My exact words were, "Are you fucking kidding me?" I like the photos as much, if not more than the videos, so I had to pay $10 more to receive zip downloads on the photos. That's frustrating. All of the payment options above the $24.95 price are based on being able to download larger video files.
So, if you prefer videos, but don't mind 720p resolution, the $24.95 option is a great deal. If you prefer pictures, you're going to have to pay the old regular price of $34.95. It lowered my score a bit. Still, I think they do their niche better than anyone and would recommend it to anyone.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very large network of some classic sites and some good newer sites.
- Give Me Pink is the top site for me and it looks like they've added it back now 4/22/2017.
- Excellent technical quality throughout the network including a relatively high number of 4k scenes, no use to me, but it's worth mentioning.
- Navigation is okay. If you mess with the tags enough you'll find that the navigation is good, but if you're impatient with the tags, you'll think it's pretty bad.
- Very good photo sets, would compare their quality to In the Crack and once questioned if Give Me Pink and In the Crack were the same company.
- Download speed is good, I'm now able to max download on porn sites at 10MB/s, I'm able to get around 8MB/s on Perfect Gonzo. Most porn sites give me 5-6 MB/s.
- Good update schedule, 10 updates so far in April, two are interviews and there were 13 updates in March, so nearly every other day.
- Huge price savings over what these sites used to cost.
Cons:
- Well, to start with, I spent the first 12 days of my membership locked out of my account. It's not a glitch or fluke. They even have a link on their login page that says, "Can't login? Forgot your password? Blocked account? Try our unblocking tool here!" Will further this in BL.
- Sites disappear then reappear. Both Give Me Pink and Fist Flush were included in the network when I signed up, then after the 12 days of being locked out, they were both gone. Now, 5 days later, they are back.
- Seems they struggle with real, legit criticism as seen by someone posting a comment to mock mine. A person who admits they were given a free membership. Mr. Perfect Gonzo webmaster, you own or run a site in an industry that has zero integrity, don't give people a reason to question yours.
- Interviews. I'm tired of disputing these with webmasters. I joined a porn site not a get to know me site.
Bottom Line:
This network intrigued as much as any network I've ever seen. One exception might be the Kink Network, but even so, Perfect Gonzo has multiple sites in it that I used to pay $29.99 a month for each one. I also had been under the impression that sites like Give Me Pink and Ass Traffic were lost in the Euro porn meltdown of 2009-2011. But now all of a sudden, those sites are going strong as is the whole network.
The technical quality here should be a big draw for those who like the big resolutions. They have 4k videos dating back to October 2014. Maybe more impressive, they have 1080p dating back to 2006. These videos also have smaller resolutions for download as well. Their picture sets are downloadable and the newer ones are 5000 long end. This part of the site is very impressive to say the least.
The navigation is good, at least to me, it's a clean network hub page that has a few easy to miss helpful parts. There's a drop-down box that allows you to filter the updates to a specific site within the network. There's tags that include the separate sites, actions, to filter the updates to your taste or interest. They even have a bonus section that has content from Blacked, Cum Louder, Teen Dreams, Sapphic Erotica, though I did watch a few of the scenes and wonder if they're just cut portions of the scenes. Still, everything is looking really good.
They use Epoch as a biller which is always a plus. The models are top-tier. You'll mostly see a bunch of Euro models, especially if you go into the older content as these sites used to be almost exclusively Euro. I'll even say a thank you to them for putting a picture zip download link in with the download links for the videos. It's a small thing, but most of us get frustrated with having to back out of video downloads, click on photos, click on download photos.
There's a good blend of genres on the network. There's solo girls, lesbian scenes, creampie, gangbang, pretty much everything you can think of outside of gay or transsexual.
At this point, I honestly believe the network is a 90+
But ... I'm now halfway through my membership and have had access to the network for only 3 days, have seen Give Me Pink content just for 2 days. Looking at my email account, I have 9 emails between Perfect Gonzo and Epoch about the login problems. Not a single one of the Perfect Gonzo ones are from an employee, a webmaster, but instead are automated emails that insist my password hadn't changed, even though it wouldn't work. On top of that, there's the link on the login page that says if your account was locked, to click the link and it will refresh your account. I did it 3 different times, loading time for the page was 3-5 minutes. It would then tell me a new password had been sent to my email. I would go check ... no email with a new password. I would check Spam/Junk ... no email. Then when I did have access, right after signing up, the Give Me Pink and Fist Flush content disappeared. As of today, 4/23/2017, both of those sites are back on this network with all their content.
I can accept glitches and any kind of technical problems, but did I really need to have 9 emails, 3 attempted password refreshes and 13 days of no access just to get the access I had paid for? I'll again point out the comment left here on PU to offset and mock mine. I'm knocking 10 points off the review for that.
This network is plenty good enough to let its content do its talking for it. One of the best I've seen when it's not removing sites or blocking access. But worse than that is when a paying member is mocked by a member who received free access. As Khan used to say, "A shill is still a shill no matter what color you paint it."
Overall content numbers:
Roughly 2,050 full scenes, each includes video and picture set as of 4/23/2017.
10 different websites within the network. Several of which I've paid $29.99/month to be a member of in the past.
I would normally say this content is exclusive, but can no longer say that since Give Me Pink and Fist Flush also come with a Sapphic Erotica membership.
If they can get over the technical problems with the site and keep those 10 sites in their network, I wouldn't be surprised if this ended up being one of the top 10 sites in the porn world. It's that good, but they need to stop me from saying "but" before I rate it that high. Paying $30 for a site in this day and age is a bit high, but I could still see it being worth that. As it is though, I'm going to end up receiving about 16 days of membership for $30.
You can do the math. I subtracted 10 points for the overall frustration between the site, lack of responses, the shill comment to offset my real, paying member legitimate complaint and see how high this network could score if all that gets fixed.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network almost exclusively dedicated to handjobs.
- There's probably more handjob content on this network than any other site or network, I'll get to that and the numbers in the bottom line.
- Download speeds are good.
- Eight sites are included in the network, but probably should just be combined into one site.
- Had some problems with this network when I tried joining their "full access" trial, so I came back as a full member and the problems are at least fixed.
Cons:
- Underwhelming. I think that word sums up the network as a whole. A lot of the models have no business being called models. The navigation is very bad. It requires a login for each of the 8 sites, despite having a network hub page. The video quality ranges from average to terrible.
- Just a note on this, back several months ago, I joined this network on a trial subscription. It originally worked as a "full trial", but after downloading 12-15 videos, it started booting me off the site. As mentioned in the pros, I didn't have these problems once I joined as a full member, but anyone considering the trial should be aware.
- Well, eventually you find a good scene, if you figure out how to find the scenes.
Bottom Line:
You might find this hard to believe, but I'm having trouble counting the number of scenes on the network simply because there's no way for me to find them. I kid you not, if you go to the homepage, this is what you're going to find:
Three mentions of new sites added to the network.
Latest prize giveaway
Two newest "Bonus Sites" which are also listed above in the "new sites" links.
A top 10 Most Popular Scenes list
A top 10 Top Rated Scenes list
The 5 latest updates
If you go to say the Club Tug site and login you are presented with the same page from above except it now has the top 10s from just Club Tug and last 5 updates from Club Tug. Eventually, you'll click on "updates" and find a scroll-a-thon through the scenes on the site. There's no filter, no way to search, but there is at least a model tab to find models you like.
I don't know whether this is sad or even real, but you receive a pop-up letter from the webmaster explaining how they offer the best customer service and feel free to email him.
Here's some numbers I have found:
Roughly 600 videos across the network. The newer videos are 1280x720, but a lot drop into the 480p range. There's no real way to know how new any of these scenes are. There's a date, but no year. Looks like they update 10 times a month, which is a respectable number.
I was pretty rough on their models in the cons, but it's true. I understand the concept of beauty if in the eye of the beholder, but there's some terribly bad looking women on this site.
Which is where I will shift gears a little. There's some well-known models here as well. There's quite a few pretty models. And as said, the newer videos are 720p quality. The newer sites, TeasePOV, Mean Massage, and Petite 18 are all good overall. Tug Job itself has plenty of good scenes on it. So, it's not all negative.
I think they could move all of the "sites" onto one site, put a decent basic search engine on it and they'd have an above-average site. As it is, you better have a good mouse with a good scroll wheel and some patience. There's good content here you won't find anywhere else or at least I've not seen before.
Quite a few of the scenes go into plots similar to CFNM sites. The Mean Massage site goes into femdom and cum-controlling. Some of it covers fairly rare content, but you'll have to find it. For me, one month was more than enough. I wouldn't pay the full price for this network. There's just too many headaches and cussing my monitor for full price. Maybe they'll get it cleaned up some with a new interface? Until then, I can't recommend it except for those who love handjobs.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A long running site that offers good (mostly) amateur masturbation pictures and videos.
- Good TBP/PU discounted price, especially if you haven't been a member for awhile or even ever.
- Navigation is good, but can be a bit wonky at times, my main problem is the picture near the top of the main page, it scrolls when I try to scroll the website.
- Good technical quality, newer videos have 1080p option and photo sets are downloadable in zips, the XL photo sets are 3000 long end.
- Well above-average DL speeds, about 80-85% of my max download speed (on porn sites).
- Updates daily, most days have multiple updates.
- Maybe the strongest pro is the models, for the most part, seem to be real amateurs who bring themselves to orgasm.
- This could be a con for some, there's also some "bonus" content from ATK Exotics, ATK Girlfriends, ATK Hairy and Wet and Puffy.
- One of personal preference, most of the models dress in normal, everyday clothes to start the sets.
Cons:
- Watch me not win over any fans with this one. I really don't like ATK Hairy. I understand there are men and women who like seeing hairy women, but the underarm hair is just too much. One can look over at some of my old ATK reviews where I also complained about the Hairy content.
- Nitpicking here much like Raging Buddhist's recent comment, I don't like the interview videos. Seriously, why would I care what an adult model says about the adult video industry?
- One that all sites using amateur models runs into, a lot of the models are shy. That's a con for me, but could be a pro for others.
Bottom Line:
I last joined Yanks way back in 2011. I did enjoy the content back then, but I thought the site lacked a certain personality I like a site to have. I compared Yanks to I Feel Myself back then and still think they're similar. The "personality" I look for is the opposite of shy. The transition from dressed to fully nude is still lacking in the majority of the videos. Most I have watched start nude and end ... well, nude. That's just a personal preference and lets have some understanding here, I've reviewed and been a member of over 200 sites. At this point, there are just things that annoy me. I'll even explain the clothed to nude preference. It lets me see what the model would look like if I saw her in person at the store.
One place this site scores high with me is its picture sets. Which continues my clothed to nude preference. The vast majority of their photo sets do start clothed and end nude with flash/teasing in-between. I enjoy these photo sets as much as the videos.
I put a con on the Hairy sets. It looks like Yanks also has their own Hairy models. Believe it or not, burn me at the stake for it, but those turn my stomach. I've told it before, I shave my head, I hate most body hair and have been this way for most of my life. But, a little neatly trimmed bush is fine, see my all-time favorite model Eve Angel. We're not talking about bush though. We're talking hairier armpits than mine. And those models are right there in the updates with no way for me to remove them from my view.
Most of that complaining isn't that bad. I like Yanks and am glad I returned. They have a lot of models I really like. Was glad to see a little heavier model like Jennavive Marie. There's some older models too. And all in all, the masturbation and orgasms are about as real as you're going to see in internet porn.
Navigation is good. They even have the bonus content from the other sites in drop-down boxes so you can easily switch from Yanks content to whichever bonus site you like. There's another side too. Straight male masturbation site called Club Stroke. Which I think is an underused concept on porn sites these days. My wife likes porn too so she can check those out. I've always wondered why more sites don't try this gender mix format. Download speeds are very good across the sites.
There's a lot of content, by my count:
2,120 videos
1,353 photo sets
Those are just the Yanks only numbers and don't include the bonus content from the other sites.
Here's the problem and it's what Raging Buddhist commented on, those video numbers include interviews, playing around videos and what I would consider non-porn videos. Which is why the navigation is considered just good. There's no way to remove the videos you're not interested in. A quick fix? Put a masturbation tag on all of the masturbation videos and add a new option in the videos drop-down box that is just masturbation to filter those out or in, depending on your perspective.
Still, the content is good and the photo sets are very good. Sometimes photos can convey teasing better than video since it captures the model before she stops teasing.
The overall technical quality is very good for a site with this type of content. As far back as I've looked, 2011 or so, has at least a 720p option on the videos. And if I were to complain anymore it would just be to say they seem to be worried more about their overall video numbers than they need to be. This is a fairly underpopulated niche in 2017 porn world. No offense is meant to the models who tell their stories or talk about the politics of the porn industry, but to put it mildly, it's just not interesting. Some of the greatest solo girl websites have used interviews and behind the scenes with some effectiveness, the ALS sites come to mind and Twistys old content when Shap was still around. It's not a big negative to me. It's just once I get caught up on the content I've missed since 2011, it will probably be awhile before I come back. Though, I don't think I'll wait 6 years again.
I'm giving the site a boost from my 2011 score since this type of content isn't easy to come by. And I'll continue to stress how important the pictures are to my score. It's a very good site to me or at least to anyone like me who hasn't been here in awhile. There's even some girl-girl content in there too, but I've mostly burnt out on girl-girl. I believe if they incorporated some type of tagging system to separate the non-porn videos from the masturbation videos, I'd add a few more points to the score. The biggest point reduction right now is there are a percentage, 20% or less, of models I don't like at all. I could see this site scoring a 90 or higher if a few things were fixed. I would recommend it for a monthly join. Especially if you like photos. I've looked over dozens of the photo sets and liked everyone of them.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very niche site from a top network. If you like seeing pretty women give a variety of blowjobs, messy, deepthroat, facials, partially clothed, all-nude, then you'll probably enjoy this site a lot.
- Includes access to the stellar DDF Network, but did used to be a successful, standalone site.
- Updates a little more than weekly, at least at the current time, averaging 5 updates per month.
- Each update comes with a video and photo set.
- Video can be downloaded in multiple resolutions and photos are zipped for downloading.
- Download speeds are above average (for porn sites), I'm downloading at 80% of my max speed.
- I've heard that women can watch these videos and improve their own oral-giving capability.
- Navigation is good, mostly straightforward for the site and network overall, but will say I always have trouble finding the pictures. It's because you just scroll down from the video.
- Network as a whole is an excellent value.
Cons:
- This might be the goofiest con I've ever listed -- I keep waiting for more than the blowjob to happen.
- Could say this on nearly all sites, could use more variety in model-type.
- Probably the closest I'll come to a real con, this type of content can become very boring and repetitive.
Bottom Line:
Only Blowjob is one of the few DDF sites I hadn't been a member of before the DDF Network. It's not so much that I dislike blowjobs, as it is, that I usually want to see more than just the blowjob. As a matter of fact, when I'm watching most porn videos, I skip the blowjob part.
I made a claim in the pros of this site can help women (or men) with their oral skills. I can tell you that. I'll leave it alone at that, but try having your significant other to watch a few and you'll see the difference.
Which is what at least helps this site stand out. You get the feeling the female models are very much into giving blowjobs. Might not sound like much, but you do see it. From techniques they use to moans from being turned on themselves. Another part I like about the site is most of the videos at least start with some teasing. There's a sensuality to the scenes that most porn rarely shows these days.
The amount of content also helps OnlyBlowjob. Almost goes into hard to believe numbers.
As of 4/3/2017: 1,647 full videos
The videos have been at minimum 720p since 2011 and all current scenes are 1080p with some being 4k and others being virtual reality. There doesn't seem to be any logical flow of when they release 4k or VR.
And to my surprise, the zipped high quality format on the pictures are 4000 long end.
I do think the niche limits the appeal of this site. I've always been drawn away from this site by the other DDF sites on the network, but was glad I checked it out this time. And it's not as formulaic as I remembered it being. There's scenes with two guys and one girl. There's scenes that bring footjobs in and there's scenes that take advantage of the bustier models large boobs.
The navigation is easy to use, but sometimes the actions listed can be wrong. Each scene has a list of actions in the video, like: Titty-fucking, cum on tits, cum in mouth, facial, masturbation, and so on. Some of those are marked on some videos, but when you watch them you won't see the action, but that's a minor complaint, not even really worth of a con.
I don't know if DDF still does this or not, but used to, some of these Only Blowjob scenes were just the blowjob section cut out of a hardcore scene. You could then look on the other DDF sites and find the whole scene. While that seemed like a rip-off, it actually changes since these Only Blowjob videos are usually right around 20 minutes long. So there's teasing you wouldn't see in the hardcore full-sex version of the scene.
That's the strength of the site. While, like me, you might think just a blowjob scene isn't really enough, you'll see that there's more to these scenes than just a blowjob. The network also comes into play since you have access to much different niches that break the monotony. It's a good site overall and one that helps the DDF Network be one of the top networks available.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
