Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Now part of a network (Sapphix). Personally, I would join it by itself for the price but you also get the excellent Sapphic Erotica with it and Fist Flush (less than 100 scenes).
- Originally one of the first sites to exclusively record almost "vulgar" masturbation by the top European models (pre-2010). You'll even notice a comment here on PU from 2010 that talks about it no longer updating.
- It's updating, not a lot but it is updating.
- Seems to have some conflicting plots in the newer content, some scenes are of a model masturbating while she watches porn that you can see on the video. Others are more in the traditional Give Me Pink style, which I will go into.
- Excellent download speeds and it's needed, the 4K scenes are upwards of 15GB.
- The archive of this site could be the best archive you're going to find for unique content of the top models from the Euro models from 2005-2010.
Cons:
- Well, if you never thought about what it would be like to be a gynecologist, you might not like some of the content.
- Solo porn isn't as popular these days and this is a solo site.
- Still baffled by the milk shooting out of the butt scenes.
Bottom Line:
I decided to go ahead and review Give Me Pink since there's no new info on it here on PU. I also did a review for Sapphix, the network they now share with Sapphic Erotica and Fist Flush.
The 2005-2010 era of porn was special to me. I really hadn't paid much attention to European porn until that era. Eve Angel is my favorite but there are others like Sophie Moone, Sandy from Club Sandy, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone, Peaches and Eufrat, these six (I hope that's the six) where labeled by me as "The no take dick six". It wasn't the nicest label since it's based on all of them having interviews with mostly broken English where they say they no take dick. All of them did at one point in their careers but once the Euro boom started, they refused to be with men. My belief is these models knew their performances as solo and lesbian models would determine if they could keep making porn without being with a man.
A few others worth mentioning: Zafira, Anette Dawn and Anetta Keys. These models with the 6 from above dominated the porn world, every site you went to had them featured. You could join Twistys (an American site) and there they were. Twistys loved Anette Dawn so much that they gave her, her own solo site. Eve, Sandy and Sandra had their own solo sites too. Maybe I'm being too sentimental but these models did the things that you see porn users complaining about now, like eye contact, expressions, stripping and bringing out erotic thoughts in your mind.
Then came Give Me Pink. A site that looked like most Euro sites but it was very different. Models that we were used to seeing finger themselves softly, were bouncing their ankles up around their ears and sticking whatever they could find in them. They were visibly wet, dildos were coming out soaked with their white liquids. I really liked it but am sure I once complained that it was "weird" and maybe even repetitive. The weirdness was mostly towards the use of milk shooting out of the model's butt. It killed the eroticism for me. I would sit there and think, "Did she just fart?"
Even so, the content was very unique for the time period and it was the only way you could see "all" of some of these models. That was the selling point, plus it had that all-important, "100% exclusive" but the site did stop updating. Before I take too much credit of digging through 2,000+ scenes to figure out which are Give Me Pink scenes, they do have a tag that let's you see just the Give Me Pink content. That's a nice feature and much appreciated.
I've went through and can see that the content stopped on 5/5/2009. It started back on 7/8/2013. Now, you can see why some might be surprised to see it back again, over 4 years of no content.
Since 7/8/2013, they have released 2 full scenes per month, that's a full video and photo set that is a professional-level photo set for download and they also offer the video caps for viewing. I used the comparison in my review of the network and will again, this content reminds me of In the Crack. Extremely high quality, you can download the videos in multiple formats and starting in 2015, the videos even include a 4K option.
The video style has changed some in the 2018 scenes. They're using a new style by having the models watch porn on their laptop. You can see the porn they're watching and it's from a tube site! I like this newer style. The classic, almost hardcore, masturbation is still great so this is a welcome change.
Here's my count:
The "older" content prior to their hiatus has 244 scenes (video and photo set) they were updating once a week back then.
The newer content (2013 forward) has 122 scenes. That's a lot of newer content that is probably being looked over by those that don't know the site is back.
I think the archived content alone would appeal to collectors and the newer content even has some "old favorites". Like Cindy Hope, who has content in the older content and in the newer content too. I would say it's a very good alternative for those looking for porn similar to In the Crack. I'm even thinking someone asked the question about content similar to In the Crack. Plus, you get Sapphic Erotica, the best lesbian site, added to it.
If you join "Sapphix" the network, be sure to click on "movies" from there you will see a link that says "search by tag". You can then pick Give Me Pink or Fist Flush or Sapphic Erotica. They also have a button on the main page, a drop-down box, that doesn't work. It shows you the first page but none of the others. This is similar to hitting the jackpot for a collector. And yes, the score is higher on the site than the network. I've only done that a few times in the past and it's similar. As I mentioned in this review, the network button for separating the content into each site doesn't work. The initial page I saw when joining advertised 7 sites with Sapphic, I only received 2 with Sapphic. It's a minimal point difference but it just shows they need to fix the network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that made me think I had found heaven but am thinking this might be hell.
- Two of the greatest "girl" sites, Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink come with this network. It also has Fist Flush too but the content is very limited, I found some way back in 2008-2009.
- Navigation is okay, seems better than it is at first, gets worse, but then improves, will explain in BL.
- Download speeds are excellent (85% of max).
- Sapphic Erotica is arguably the greatest lesbian site in internet porn history.
- Very high quality, dating back to the 2007 content, they have 1080p option on the videos and have 4K option dating back to September 2015.
- Updates roughly 10 times per month.
- If your porn interest is in just women, solo and lesbian scenes, this is the network for you, there are 0 scenes with men.
- The archives include some of the most explicit masturbation (Give Me Pink) of the Euro top models from 2005-2010.
Cons:
- Two problems in one con. On the model list, they are still using Sapphic Erotica's aliases for the Sapphic Erotica scenes. If you weren't around when Euro porn was the top porn, you might not be familiar with this and the countless debates we used to go through with webmasters over the confusion of aliases. And they use one name for multiple models, even when you use the "search" but the search goes around the aliases! Meaning if you search for Eve Angel, her scenes listed as Daphne (Sapphic Erotica) also show up.
- Fist Flush has very little content on here. It's not a site I'm familiar with so I don't know how much there should be.
- One of the advertising "index" pages I was on said you get 7 sites with Sapphic Erotica but you don't, you get 2 with Sapphic Erotica.
Bottom Line:
I'll start with why I took 10 points off the score. When I was checking out Sapphix, it said 7 sites are included with a membership to Sapphic Erotica and one of those sites was In Focus Girls, a site Sapphic Erotica owned. Once I signed up, there's really only two sites on Sapphix. It also only officially lists 3 but one is Fist Flush, I've only found a handful of scenes from it (really didn't intend that one). This is combined with the network Perfect Gonzo, that was supposed to have Give Me Pink on it. When I joined Perfect Gonzo, they told me it was originally supposed to be on Perfect Gonzo but was now on Sapphix. This is all too typical of mid to late 2000s Euro porn.
But the Sapphix site redeems itself. It does "only" include Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink but those are two of the top 10 sites of the 2005-2010 era (Euro boom) AND they're updating. I probably should review those sites separately since they are very large sites with big followings and might in the future but for now, I'm sticking to the network.
I had to dig deep into the archive of my reviews to find how I scored these sites in the past. I gave Sapphic Erotica a 94 in 2007 and Give Me Pink an 88 in 2008.
Sapphic Erotica was and still is the premier lesbian site, TBP's current score on it is 95. And they've been around since 2003. They were the first lesbian site that I know of that had "tribbing" or scissoring. They had deep kissing between the models, models getting so turned on even with their panties on that you could see a wet spot forming on their panties. But they did go mainstream at some point (2010, maybe?) and started focusing on quantity over quality. The newer content (2014-15 and forward is more like the older content).
Give Me Pink was at one time part of a group of sites (not a network) owned by one company that focused on extremely high quality, for the time (1080p in 2007) and they had every known, great, top-tier Euro model on their site with a catch. It was as close to "hardcore" masturbation as you could get. Close-ups throughout the masturbation. Old friend and PU member Denner once asked, "Is it a porn site or a site about gynecology?" It wasn't for everyone but it was for me. I had watched these models tease and "gently" masturbate for years. I wanted to see more and Give Me Pink did that. Then, it and its sister sites, stopped updating. Sister sites included All Internal and Ass Traffic. Those like me then found In the Crack and I've even wondered in, In the Crack reviews, if the Give Me Pink producers were the producers at ITC. That's a compliment.
What you get here is Sapphic Erotica and Give Me Pink, including their entire archives. You also get 10 new scenes a month and the quality shows with 1080p videos dating back to 2007, 4K dating back to 2015.
It's really impressive but there's that alias problem which really isn't a problem unless you want to use the model list and not the search box.
If you're into the more extreme insertions, Give Me Pink was one of the first sites I knew of that did it. Including some models using a smaller than average baseball bat. They also include photo sets in downloadable zips.
There's a chance that my excitement over this combination won't be as exciting to others. That 2005-2010 era of porn was my favorite and while they have new content, I'm mostly focused on that era.
Their overall content includes 2237 movies. The Sapphic scenes average 30-40 minutes, the Give Me Pink scenes average 30-50 minutes. They do some "strange" things in the classic Give Me Pink scenes including but not limited to, squirting milk out of their butthole. The newer Give Me Pink scenes aren't near as long (10-30 minutes).
I would say anyone who is into the kinkier masturbation would like Give Me Pink, especially if you were into any of the Euro models from the time period I mentioned. Anyone who likes lesbian porn should love Sapphic Erotica. They at least have returned to their more classic style of shooting. I watched a scene earlier between two women I'm not familiar with, Talia Mint (sounds familiar to me) and Vanna Bardot, full scene of fully dressed to kissing, undressing each other, lots of touching that gets rougher and where these scenes stand out just like they did in their heyday, after both orgasm, they're still laying there together, naked, kissing and lightly touching each other. There's a high level of eroticism in these scenes. Overall, I would recommend it to anyone who likes In the Crack and anyone who likes lesbian porn that doesn't come off as too scripted. Would also recommend it to any women who are wondering if they're bi-curious, pretty sure the tagline to women viewers on Sapphic's scenes was, "If you weren't bi-curious, you will be soon." Meaning it's also female-friendly porn. I'm just learning about the genre so bare with me. Very good price from TBP/PU too. I used to pay $29.95 for each of these sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The first site I've known of that covers the "dressing room" fetish.
- The quality is very high, maybe the highest I've seen as an overall site but there's a con about this too.
- Some well-known models like Lil' Caprice but there are a few models here that I've never heard of and you'll see the big con but these particular "new" models to me were worth joining for.
- You're going to get three main fetishes here: Dressing Room, panties and a combination of tease/explicit masturbation that is kind of rare these days.
- Very good download speeds, thanks to my cable company, hitting 80% of my new 400M internet connection.
- One day this will be part of a network and it will be worth joining that network for.
- CCBill is the biller and they tried a cross sale for Sex Art.
- If you like the models and the fetishes, I think it's a good price for this site.
- Updates twice a week
Cons:
- The site is small. As of today, 9/11/2018, they have 58 videos, 58 photo sets and 30 "extras" photo sets that look to be fairly genuine in being true self-shot photos.
- I would like to see them do more with the dressing room fetish. At times it feels like I could be watching a common solo video of a model without even noticing the setting.
- The lost fetish, bottom line will explain.
Bottom Line:
I don't know if it's an age thing or if maybe it's more of a more recent trend (thanks, smartphones) but I have this strange, unusual fetish of women undressing in dressing rooms and doing more to themselves while in there. I say strange even though I think it's much more common these days. I have dated a few women recently who liked sending pictures from the dressing room. You know the way that goes, "Do you like this outfit? Is this cute on me? Am I too old to be wearing this?" Then 376 pictures later, "How about this?" And the clothes magically disappeared.
Maybe that's the appeal of this site to me, the tease lasts about half of the video (20-25 minutes long scenes). You know you're getting old when a woman is sending you pictures and you're replying, "I'm getting hungry! And no, not in a sexual way!"
This site is in one way, very basic. The navigation is very simple and works as it should. The technical quality is the best I've seen when it comes to 100% of the content having these specs:
The videos are downloadable in 3 sizes, 4K, 1080p and 720p. I still don't have a 4K monitor so I can't say how crisp or clear those are but the 720p are very crisp and clear to me.
The pictures are downloadable and start with the model dressed, some of the outfits are very pretty, almost like it's what the model chose to wear or like they have a wardrobe specialist. The pictures are nearly 6000 long end.
The site is almost painfully exclusive feeling. What I mean by that, it's like they have very serious standards for their models. They have 58 scenes (videos and photos) but only 20 models. Which is good if you're like me and found a few you hadn't seen before, most have multiple shoots and outfits. At this point, it looks like this site should be rated very high unless removing points for the small size of it.
But ... why make a niche site that is untouched for the most part and make production mistakes that all but ruin the niche? First video I watched, the model teases, she's stripping, good site for those into panties, she starts masturbating and starts moaning loudly and groaning and squealing. A woman wouldn't masturbate in a store dressing room and moan and groan loudly! It's like writing a classic novel only to forget to proofread it.
That moaning is annoying enough but the scenes are dead silent. This isn't really a dressing room, is it? It's a box on the set? Where's the soft background music we would hear in stores? What about people randomly talking? This niche has a ton of potential but hearing a model's heels echo in a hollow room isn't part of the potential. That's sad to me.
I once watched an amateur that recorded herself masturbating in a dressing room. She was nearly biting her lip off to stop from moaning but someone bumped the door or went in the dressing room beside her and it aroused her, so a small moan slipped out. There's the potential. Something that makes this content look like it's a horny woman but not porn. Maybe I'm asking too much but anything to make scenes more than just basic masturbation scenes that are shot in the same room. I love to use my imagination when viewing porn but these production errors do make it almost too hard to imagine.
What saves them, besides the technical quality, are the models. I downloaded the content of 17 of the 20 models. Even found one model I'm not familiar with that I am going to have to look for, Apolonia Lapiedra, anyone that knows of more content of her let me know. She's engagement ring level.
I will also give them credit for not fudging the model's ages. Not that I know their ages but as mentioned, Lil' Caprice is here and instead of like most sites, she's not listed as 19, she's listed as 29. The youngest model on the site is 22, the oldest is 31. There is anal, vaginal masturbation but no sex, not even girl-girl. It's a girl and her toy in a box. Jill-in-the-box? Joking aside, I like this site for a one month join. They are updating twice a week but given that the videos are not that long, you will download most everything you want in a week (max). It's a very good, solo, panties, tease, masturbation site but every scene is in the box so I can't get the dressing room part out of my head.
I would recommend it for those who stand outside a dressing room and see a pretty woman walk in and start ignoring their wife asking them to get her a bigger size. If you're into "she would be that loud in public" (not your wife) then you'll love the content. I think panty fetishists also would enjoy this site. The scenes have roughly 10 minutes of tease at the beginning (formulaic?). For me the models made the site above average but that's really as far as I can go. Check the models out before joining and decide from there. Last, I did a similar of review of Fitness Rooms, with similar "problems" of the content just not being believable enough but it doesn't look like the sites are related.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, this mostly non-nude site is one of the top 3 sites for me.
- One of my biggest complaints on photo-dominated sites is starting the sets out nude. It doesn't happen here as their clothing is part of the eroticism.
- As good as it gets when it comes to attractive, girl next door types.
- Download speeds are very fast and since most of what you download are picture sets, there's no frustration of large files.
- The price: $9.99 for a month or $30 for a year.
- CCBill for billing.
- I think this site is as much a "fetish" site as any fetish site.
- Shot in everyday, natural locations in everyday, natural clothes.
- Some of the photo sets have videos that are videos of the photography set, it lets you see the model's personality.
- Averages an update every other day.
- Picture sets are downloadable in zip files.
- Biggest pro will be in the bottom line, takes too many characters to explain.
Cons:
- It's not a con for me but there are sets that you won't see any nudity in them.
- This is also a pro for me but might be a con for some, there's excellent variation in body types, races as said in pros, very much the girl next door types.
- When you get to the end of a picture set and the teasing model decides to just tease!
Bottom Line:
This review will be a little different than my normal style. Zishy has become one of my top 2 or top 3 sites. I think it's a polarizing "porn" site. There's not a lot of nudity and "pink" is rare. There's no sex, no triple vaginal while double analing, no cumshots, no masturbation. But ... to me, it's one of the most arousing sites on the internet. One of my exes used to say I am one the most difficult men to be with because nudity doesn't excite me. I blame a childhood and teenage years in Los Angeles for that. The biggest pro that I talked about above is:
I'm going to use a set from Zishy to show the biggest pro. Noelle Monique in "Cleopatra was Black". She's a medium brown complexion, very pretty, jet black curly hair and she has some curves. It's filmed in Corona, California, been there many times myself. California is known for its beautiful sunsets. Zishy must have timed this set right as the sun was setting in the background. Noelle has on a skin-tight, sheer, white, dress. The contrast between her complexion, the very dark hair and white dress is perfect. The outdoor portion of the set starts with her back to the camera, the sunset gleams through the sheer white dress so you can see every inch of her legs up to her butt. From the front view, her hard nipples can be seen through the dress (major fetish) and her expressions range from a cute, playful smile to the look of her knowing this might be the sexiest she's ever looked. Later on in the set, they move to a department store, I'm going to guess a well-known, old hardware, family department store based on the brands that can be seen. And she's flashing her boobs, her butt, even a few showing her pubic area but not spread open.
That is the biggest pro. FTV at times can pull that one off but Zishy does it in almost every set. Instead of the model's eyes starting a scene with "come to me" eyes then hardcore sex happening, these scenes start with "I'm going to be sexy" eyes and ends with "come to me". It's unique and unmatched in porn. And that's exactly what I want in a porn site. Not the tease or ending with "come to me" but to say, "You're not going to get this anywhere else."
It has kept me around for 3 years. There are sets that don't have that magic and I personally think Noelle's might be the best set on the site but it happens regularly on Zishy. Here's the factual information:
The very first set was posted on 11/1/2011 and it has updated every other day since. That's roughly 182 photo sets per year, nearly 7 years for roughly 1,200 photo sets.
I could make that a con and it's probably why I don't give it a 100. The site is one page and you scroll through 250+ rows of 4 picture sets. If I could offer any advice it would be to put them into months or even years.
Some of the sets have videos but outside of watching a few of the streams of them, I've never downloaded them. They are just videos of the photo sets. You do get to see the model's personality in those.
I don't know if all the sets are based out of California but if it's not California it's Nevada or Arizona. There's also something that is another fetish for me. Some sets are shot in department stores. I've seen Target, maybe a drug store, grocery stores and I'll admit, I used to date a woman who was into flashing in stores.
I do think it's kind of funny that I complain about sites that don't start a scene off with the model dressed while this site will often end with the model still dressed. I've compared Zishy to FTV in the past and while I don't know Zishy or if he's connected with FTV, there are a lot of models on here who are also on FTV and the Zishy set will tell you that, "You can see much more of this model on FTV". Considering the year membership is the price of some premium sites monthly price, it's never a question for me.
There's also points for not sticking to one type of model. I've always said I'm attracted to almost all women. I know the chubbier, thicker models aren't for everyone but seeing them here shows why I respect Zishy's work. They're as "sexy" and "hot" as any of the other models.
The fetishes this site plays into: Exhibitionism, flashing, public nudity, upskirts, panties, tight clothes, cameltoes and one you rarely hear about in porn: Female sexuality and sensuality. It might have been Anais Nin that said, "If a woman can't arouse a man without taking her clothes off she's not a woman." Zishy's models and photography does that. I also will say despite no sex/masturbation, the poses are sexual and a select few of the models even show their wetness through their panties (forgot that fetish). Also forgot to mention these aren't all amateurs. There are some well-known porn stars here too.
I wanted to go 100 but that scrolling, page loading, is one of my longtime porn pet peeves. Recommended to those who like the sensuality of younger women, the playfulness of girl next door types without needing full nudity and/or sex.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The much-maligned public sex site of the Kink network.
- There are a few newer sites that are trying to do the same genre and niche but Public Disgrace, to me, is the best at it and you get access to the Kink network too.
- Very good download speeds, 80% and up of my max.
- All of the scenes over the last year and a half are at least 50 minutes long and some are over an hour. (The importance of this will be in the BL)
- Still has that Kink style of quirkiness in the majority of the scenes.
- Though I think the creativity has dropped a little over the years, they're still setting the bar for production values.
- For this type of content, their catalog is huge, by my count they have 481 scenes. Most sites like this one have less than 100. And they update twice a month, like clockwork, including sometimes three times a month if the weeks fall right.
- If you're just focused on this site or one of the others on the network the navigation is very good.
Cons:
- I think they still have some problems with laws, you kind of get the feeling that it might disappear one day and never come back.
- If you're not careful the content can seem to be very repetitive but it's probably not fair to say that considering it's public sex.
- Another one for those who like to nitpick, not all scenes are truly "public". All scenes do have a crowd of people watching but seem to be in controlled environments.
Bottom Line:
Public Disgrace pushed boundaries when it first opened. The mere thought of what their scenes had them would make most people's eyes bug out of their head. They have a model or in a few cases, models, meet them somewhere usually public, could be a bus, could be a park, could be a bus stop, an adult video store or pretty much anywhere public you can think of. Most of the scenes start with the model being stripped, bound by rope and led around a city. If that makes you laugh or smile you'll probably love this site. In some of the scenes they stay in fairly public place but I've never been fully convinced that any of these areas aren't controlled environments. Does that take away from the experience? Not for me.
The model(s) is the most important part of the Public Disgrace scenes. Some are either really horny or wanting to leave a good impression. Those models are touching the clothed people while two guys are double penetrating her. Some are not as involved with the crowd and whether it's fair or not, those scenes fall pretty flat for me.
There's even a comment here on PU about when Kink was shutting Public Disgrace down. And they were down for awhile but out of nowhere, they showed back up and started updating again. This is the biggest compliment I can give this site and Kink overall:
This site is why I join Kink's network with year memberships. There's months that I only get two new scenes then the lucky ones with three and I think those scenes alone are worth the subscription price. I like other sites on the Kink Network but I could join once a year to get those scenes. The Public Disgrace updates are ones I don't want to wait for.
Not to advertise a different site but to show how difficult this style is, especially in the United States, Brazzers had Asses in Public. It was similar to Public Disgrace without bondage. The last time I was on Brazzers, Asses in Public only had a dozen or so scenes. It used to have near 100 but they had to take some of them down. Public Disgrace/Kink obviously spends a lot of time making sure they are cleared to shoot this style of porn.
You will notice a difference in the scenes if you go back and watch scenes from the first few years compared to now but I do believe in the last year and a half, their scenes have improved from where they were. The was a lull when no new scenes were coming out then they went to shorter scenes that were 20-30 minutes long. As mentioned in the pros, the last year and a half has scenes that are at least 50 minutes and a few go near 75 minutes. In this style of porn (exhibitionism, voyeurism, especially), that's a big deal. It gives more time for the buildup, the parts that don't look as controlled. You also get to see the model often laughing, sometimes blushing and I think that helps keep Kink on the "good guys" list as it shows the model's willingness to be involved in this debauchery.
The Kink quirkiness: This is the only porn studio I know of that surprises me. Sometimes it's something goofy like for those Game of Thrones fans, shortly after the Cersei "Walk of Shame", Kink put two nude models in a near identical walk of shame scene. There's psychology going on there since they know a lot of guys and women too were aroused by the Game of Thrones scene. There's more too, like the elderly man who jumps into a scene and starts groping a model. Is it staged and planned? Maybe but it's more than other studios are doing.
This site itself has 481 scenes as of 8/14/2018, they do have pictures but I still haven't seen a way to download them. I would think only the public pictures would be of any value to a viewer since you might see things you didn't catch in the video.
I'll mention that in my Kink Network review, I said Public Disgrace now has a subtitle of "Sluts in Spain". I'm not for sure why they did that other than to release two scenes that I assume were shot in Spain. I don't know where the majority of these scenes are shot but do know in the older scenes, there are some from San Francisco. I thought the Sluts in Spain was their new main location to film from since their header had the subtitle in it but it does seem to be just a few scenes as the newest scenes no longer say it.
It takes brave people to do these scenes. I would imagine performing in front of even planned audience members, would make it difficult for some models (both the males and females). Public Disgrace does by far the best job of it and their models, overall, are the most believable in this style of porn.
I do not list their video resolution as a con, anymore. The videos max out at 720p resolution but with the scenes being around an hour each, anything bigger on the resolution and the file sizes would be massive to download. It's still not perfect but it's well-above similar sites and in a class of its own.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's one of the best photography sites on the internet and has been around long enough that I was once a member in 2006.
- It is an "artsy" site but it has a naughty side.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- Quality is extremely high, will explain in BL.
- Models from all over the world, including the United States, which is kind of unusual for this type of site.
- Updates, on average, every other day. Today is July 31st and there are 16 July updates.
- One of the last sites to really focus on the setting, the colors in the background and it shows.
- The TBP/PU price is very good.
- Ready for this one? Bills through Epoch or CCBill, your choice and can use Paypal too.
- Another shocker ... not a single ad in the member's area and zero cross-sales.
- One of the most diverse photography sites, quite a few Latina models and most of these models are new to me. The one thing that doesn't vary is that every model is pretty.
Cons:
- It's a small one but I think it could be confusing to first-time/new members and that's the difference in the videos that come with the pictures and the "films" that are separate. I will cover it in the BL.
- I don't know if this is a fair con but each time I go to the home screen there's a Watch 4 Beauty notice that they now have a mobile site. Is it better than the desktop site? I don't understand its purpose. Of course, I don't look at porn on my phone either.
Bottom Line:
Watch 4 Beauty is my favorite of the photography/artsy sites. They took risks when the other artsy sites wouldn't. So, they won me over a long time ago. I know they don't update as much as some of the other photography sites but they update enough for me. Their archive has around 2,500 photo sets in it too.
The first place they stand out is in the photography. You have four download choices, 1200 pixels, 2000 pixels or "4000", the 4000 are close to 6000 long end which is huge. They also have the rather unique "PDF portfolio" download as well.
Where they're different from many photography sites is they have "films". This also goes into the confusion. Each photo set has an accompanying video BUT that video is a behind the scenes video that is nothing more than a videographer recording the photo session. Oddly enough, they have this video embedded above the photos. The photos are in 3 rows and at the end of the photos are the links to download the picture set and a link to download the embedded video, it's only available in 1080p. The "films" are normal masturbation-type videos.
These films are some of the best masturbation videos I've seen. They also can be downloaded in 3 different sizes the 4K 2160p, 1080p and 540p. These are some of the most realistic masturbation scenes I've seen. They're not overly long, most are in the 10-13 minute range and they're not filled with a lot of fake screaming and forced "dirty talk". This works here because most of the models are younger (under 25). The bad part is these films are only released once a week. There's around 480 of these films so there is a fairly large amount considering it's a photography site.
The part I think is negative there is not all the models appear in "films" and unless you're on the model's page, you're going to have to scroll through the films category to find ones you're looking for.
The model list works. Each model's page has all of her photo sets listed, all of her films listed and there's a ranking system for members to go by when looking for new models.
If I was to say what's the best part of this site, it would be that it's like porn sites used to be. They find a pretty setting, place a very pretty model in the setting, take pictures/behind the scenes video and/or shoot a film. It's also nice to see a choice of billers when joining. If you use Paypal you have to bill through Epoch. Oddly enough for me, Paypal won't let me use my Visa debit card to join porn sites but I do have a Mastercard and they accept it. Besides that there's the easy to use navigation, no advertisements to try and avoid, no cross-sales to uncheck and the site works exactly how it should.
The models are the biggest draw here. I have more Latina models in my collection, from Watch 4 Beauty, than I do from any other site and that includes sites with the name "Exotics" in them. I do think it's possible for new members to be frustrated by the videos included with picture sets just being videos of the photography session but I think most or all of the photography sites do those too. The films separate it from the others and are what makes it my favorite "photography" site.
There are models on here that remind you it's okay to be shallow. Ariela looks like a 19 year old Angelina Jolie. Karin Torres shows that not all Latina women are full of curves but is still quite stunning. Li Moon shows that Asian models aren't all slender with her curves. Irene Rouse reminds me that I have a strange fetish for women with unique hair. Not that it's unusual hair but it's a style that was more popular 20 years ago. That, to me, is when a porn site is doing a good job. They are focusing on bringing out the strengths of the models instead of making every model's strength rest between her legs. Maybe that's even more pornographic than hardcore porn? I'm getting too old to be seduced but there's a seductive quality to this content that's uncommon these days.
I did want to throw in since someone asked, there are both portrait and landscape photos on this site. I too can be enticed by a beautiful landscape with a pretty model blended in. Unless I've missed it at the other photography sites, I think Watch 4 Beauty does that better than anyone and it's why I score it a 95. I also want to mention the archive of models that are now becoming "old" or "classic". In my 12+ years of collecting porn, my very favorite photos of Anetta Keys are from Watch 4 Beauty. I don't know what they did with the lighting, the setting colors but it really made her "glow". Which is probably why they call it nude art. You just don't find many sites like this one anymore. Highly recommended to picture fans and solo masturbation fans (for the films).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that keeps improving. And includes Nubiles.net which is one of the best sites in its genre.
- The most recent content focuses on the "step family" niche. A big departure from Nubiles.net's more focused mostly solo content. It is welcomed as it brings variety.
- The technical quality is high throughout the network.
- Download speeds are very good, 80% my max download speed.
- As a network, I would put them on par with the top networks on the internet (Brazzers, Reality Kings, Bang Bros, etc...).
- Nubiles.net is the ace up the sleeve that nudges them ahead of all other networks.
- Bills through Epoch.
- Navigation has improved since my last visit.
- For me, I like the lightheartedness of their stepfamily scenes. Some of the acting, Abella Danger is guilty, makes me laugh in a good way.
- A month isn't long enough to go through this network. I'm not even for sure 6 months is enough.
Cons:
- Just not much to complain about. The lesser-used sites of the network like Driver XXX, which I thought was a good site hasn't updated in 3 years.
- Maybe stick a border at the top that says Nubiles.net is included. It does show up in the little "world/network" tab but other than that I don't see it anywhere else on the site.
Bottom Line:
For many years, Nubiles.net, was one of my favorite sites. I wasn't for sure how I felt about Nubiles adding new sites. I also like their site Anilos as well. The network at first was questionable for me because it was more like they were using it to test different styles of scenes. As mentioned, Driver XXX, would be a perfect example of that. In 2015, they released 13 "episodes" from the Driver XXX series but none since. My concern was fair, in my mind, I thought it would cause Nubiles.net to slow or drop off or even disappear (see Club Sandy after 21 Sextury went to a network).
Instead, Nubiles.net still updates nearly two times a day just by itself. And the network itself updates 4-5 times a week. So, you're getting a network that updates and a premium solo model site that updates twice a day (on average) for the price of one site.
The good part of this arrangement is Nubiles.net retains a mostly amateur feel to the models while Nubiles Porn network has the more known models in hardcore scenes. There's a fine-line for me when it comes to adding hardcore scenes to an otherwise softcore site and Nubiles Porn is now doing it as good as anyone. I think their only real competition is DDF's Network. I think both of those sites would take that as a compliment to both.
One of my favorite (more recent) hardcore scenarios is the one where the stepmom or aunt walks in on a younger couple having sex and joins or "teaches". They have a lot of that in the newer content on Nubiles Porn. You also get the admittedly funny, boyfriend distracted while an older man is seduced by the boyfriend's girlfriend. Nubiles does these types of scenes with what I consider "good taste" in that they make them so outrageous that you don't become too uncomfortable about the scene. I mentioned Abella Danger's funny acting ability and that came up in a recent scene where Abella and stepbrother/stepsister were on vacation when Abella walks in on them having sex. She looked like she had been hit on the head with an anvil! Have to love the corny humor that comes from this niche.
And if you're an imagination porn user you can imagine it as being completely serious if you have a fetish for the niche.
The videos on Nubiles Porn give you five download options from 270p to 1080p. They also have photo sets for download and also screencaps for download.
It's not as easy to find total content counts since some of the scenes appear on more than one site but Nubiles.net offers roughly 10,000 scenes, which is unheard of for a solo model site with the occasional hardcore/lesbian scene.
On the Nubiles Porn scenes they use season/episode for each episode. For example, Mom's Teach Sex is in Season 8, Episode 8. While I'm all for making things more organized, the newest season of Mom's Teach Sex started in April. Each season has 10 episodes and lasts 4 months (2 updates per month). There doesn't seem to be any connection from the episodes to each other or from season to season but it is an interesting way to list your scenes and organize them. It does help some with counting the scenes too. Like Mom's Teach Sex, 7 full seasons at 10 episodes each season is 70 plus the 8 in the current season. But I'm not going to go through all 15 sites and figure that out for each.
I did notice that Nubiles Unscripted hasn't updated recently and that was one of my favorites in this network. A couple of others don't have July scenes but there's still 7 days left in July, as I write this. The overall update number probably explains more than listing each site. There's 15 sites besides Nubiles.net and they update roughly 16 times a month. Most of the updating sites do 2 updates per month so I think it would be safe to say 8 of the network sites are updating.
The models at Nubiles have always been a major selling point. On Nubiles.net you get the amateur-style models and they don't cake a pound of makeup on the models. The models vary from average, plain-looking to very pretty. Nubiles Porn's models are mostly porn stars but are from the younger models unless it's a site like Mom's Teach Sex.
I like it well-enough and the content well-enough that I'm planning on rejoining once this membership runs out, to a longer-term membership just because I don't feel like I'm coming close to downloading all the content I want.
Highly recommended especially for those who like to use their imagination or those who don't insist on the scenes to be 100% authentic in what it advertises itself as.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the most unique and largest networks on the internet.
- Kink covers lots of ground in niches, also there is a large variety of models (body type, race, hair length, etc...).
- I have seen others say they have DL speed problems but I haven't had any. I download at 85% of my max download speed.
- Depending on your depth of interest in varied niches, one could easily say this network has the most value of any network.
- The network continues to grow and offers access to 71 sites. Will detail in BL.
- Update schedule is inconsistent but there's right at 2 updates per day (across the network).
- High quality throughout but not HD (720p max).
Cons:
- There's the obvious; Kink's content isn't for everyone but I do think most people could find at least a few of the sites appealing.
- Navigation is okay but it can be frustrating thanks to so much content (across the network) and some poorly tagged scenes.
- It's hard to say a network with 71 sites is losing steam but they do have their times when the content is inconsistent from scene to scene.
Bottom Line:
The first time I reviewed the Kink network it was right after they had launched the full network. I was shocked to see so many sites I had joined before but with the network all were available for 1 price. The old saying of "Too much of a good thing is never enough" doesn't really apply here. I can't imagine how someone could go through this whole network in a month, even two or three months, if I'm focused, I can scour two or three sites, download what I want, in about a month. You definitely get your money's worth.
The basis of Kink's content is in bondage, rough(er) scenes, light torture, excellent production values including costumes and sets. Because the number of sites it comes with keeps growing, I'm going to list them in groups so you can see the amount of depth this network has. I will separate gay men, transsexual, into their own groups. The rest includes male with female, female with female, groups.
Then there are these that are straight male, woman and some bisexual women but these focus more on the women dominating men and/or women (asterisk is dominating men):
I really have trouble believing any network or even DVD site has that many genres and niches covered under one subscription. Similar to Pink Panther's comment about Evil Angel having filters to filter out content you don't want to see, Kink also gives you the ability to filter out the transsexual and/or gay content.
There's a few things I have noticed this time as a member. One of my favorite Kink sites is Public Disgrace, it has had its share of controversy over the years but I now notice it is named, "Public Disgrace ... Sluts In Spain", all the archive content is still there and up until June 2018, they had been releasing 2 scenes per month. Only one in June and none so far in July.
Overall, it feels like the updates have slowed somewhat. The amount of sites is also much higher than it usually advertises, 71 to 23 that TBP advertises. But a lot of those sites are newer and don't have a lot of content on them. I also don't remember if the gay content used to be counted in the Kink network.
My interest in the network hasn't changed much. Public Disgrace is still one of my favorite sites. Ultimate Surrender is a great site but in moderation as the content does become repetitive. Fucking Machines features a lot of more mainstream models. Sex and Submission is as accessible as 95% of hardcore/bondage DVDs you'll find. The Upper Floor is still as far-reaching as it ever was. I'm under the impression at this point that its goal was never really realized so they just use it as a roleplaying/rich/wealthy society type fetish. There really is something for everyone and they do have pictures available for download but those vary from site to site.
The only technical knock is one that has been there for years and it's that the videos are 720p. I've told this before, that's my preferred video resolution so it's not a big deal to me. More importantly, the Kink scenes are relatively long compared to most porn scenes, some go over an hour each, so even the 720p versions are often 3-4 GB each. The only real disappointment I ever have with the Kink network is the lack of time. They have content of two of my favorite "softer" models, Lana Lopez and Satine Phoenix but I usually forget to download them. On average, I keep a membership here 6 months out of each year but a lot of times, I won't visit it for 2-3 months at a time. My score is a little lower than my first review of the network but that's because of the lesser updates, especially Public Disgrace and the newer sites not updating enough to make up for the older sites slowing down. It's still the best of non-mainstream porn and the best value as well.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A very large porn studio dedicated to pushing boundaries and bringing hardcore porn to the people.
- Evil Angel somehow has become so full of content that they are catching up with the big DVD sites.
- High quality throughout, picture sets that are downloadable, videos that have download options from 180p to 1080p.
- Diversity is a strength for Evil Angel, will go more into in the BL.
- Very good navigation options but even so, it can be overwhelming at times.
- Updates include at least one video per day and they add full DVDs (4-5 scenes) a couple times a week.
- Very good download speeds, 80% of my max.
- They're one of those sites that the exclusivity of the content falls under "it's their content" but you will see some of the content on other sites.
Cons:
- Anytime you become varied in your focus in porn it could be a problem for some. This will be in the BL.
- I can't imagine how they could improve the navigation but they could clean the site up. Every page I click on takes its own sweet time loading all the images.
- Probably not for those who like softer porn.
Bottom Line:
Evil Angel is kind of like Kink for me. I'll go for months without wanting to see something too different than normal porn then the urge will hit me to see something different. Evil Angel is one of the first sites I turn to when that urge hits. I do think their content is becoming less polarizing than it used to be as mainstream porn now contains many of the themes and niches you will find on Evil Angel.
What separates Evil Angel and Kink too from most "harder" sites is they can sign top-tier models. Some of my favorite Skin Diamond videos are from Evil Angel, as well as Jynx Maze. They do enough to keep their porn out of the cookie-cutter feel.
I talked about the varied focus and diversity. This just isn't in the obvious diversity like race, type of bodies. Evil Angel has categories like: DP, Double Anal, Pegging, Double Vaginal, Shemale fucks woman, Shemale fucks man, Shemale fucks shemale, Family roleplay, Midget, Prolapse, Stepsister, Stepdad, Stepmom, and they still do the normal straight-forward porn too. I do think that much diversity causes some to shy away from the site.
The good news is they have a ton of content no matter what category you like.
By my count they have 12,636 scenes. They have 1,500+ DVDs. Because there's so much content there's no way I could separate the scenes from DVDs to see how many of those overlap but it's a lot of porn, either way.
Something I like that some might not notice is they have added older videos and used the correct date on them. If you go to their last page of videos, you'll see videos from 1989 and 1990, including the legendary Buttman Goes to Rio. There's a nice collection of those older DVDs on here too as those are often the ones I'm most interested in.
There's also close to 4,500 models which does include men but besides lots of categories there are lots of models to go through too.
I mentioned this in a recent review of another site that is under the Fame Cash biller, these sites all have the same navigation. It's nice for those of us who like using the same navigation but I do think it hurts a little on Evil Angel. They have a "videos" tab that will take you to the newest updated scenes and a "movies" tab that takes you to the newest added DVDs. Then they have "pornstars" which is a model list but even if you put it in alphabetical order you're left guessing which number the letter M starts with, so your better choice is using the drop-down menu which has 4,500+ models in it. That's nitpicking and I know it but it does seem like something could be cleaned up there. Their ads are mostly their own, advertising a current top scene or a scene that's coming up. The only non-Evil Angel ad I've seen is at the bottom of each page for Bang.com.
As a photo collector, I should go back and say most of the photo sets are small. I've seen some as small as 10 pictures but as I've said before, it's better to give me something that I want more of than not give me any to complain about.
There is content here that some won't like and some that will even offend some people. Not that I think that's bad, we all have our lines of what is too far or too much but that could detract for some and improve for others. I do know a couple of other mainstream sites, including Videobox, either stopped or slowed their updating of transsexual content, not Evil Angel, they get a couple of TS DVDs in every month. I've said before that for me personally that's how these large DVD sites should be.
The videos are downloadable and download at 15MBps for me on what seems to be a 100-130M connection. The files can be large on here as mentioned earlier, they do use production values with stories, setups, teases. I am comfortable saying it's the best niche DVD site on the internet. As a straightforward DVD porn site it's also near the top. I don't know how much of their content is disliked by the average porn user or I would consider saying it's the best overall DVD site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my all-time favorite networks.
- Very good download speeds.
- The archive on this network is huge.
- Does mostly have softer content, even in the b/g content. You'll find a few rough scenes here and there.
- The biggest collection of the infamous Euro stars from 2003-2009, known as the "No Take Dick Six". They'll be in the BL.
- I will say the newer scenes are getting better.
- High quality all-around the network.
- Navigation is good for a network.
- One of the last networks to have picture sets with every scene and they're really photo sets, not screencaps from the videos.
Cons:
- Update schedule is below average, much like 21Sextreme (the sister site), I expect a network of 21 sites to have at least 1 update per day across the whole network but so far in June, there are 17 updates in 19 days.
- The amount of sites that are no longer updating. Some are understandable like Sweet Sophie Moone (retired) but there are way too many not updating, will list in BL.
- Those damned picture captchas, no, I won't click on the storefront. Becoming harder to cancel too. I had to know my username, my password, the email address and click a captcha. I store my user/pass in my browser so I rarely know those.
Bottom Line:
I once called this one of the greatest networks ever. I have a still crush on the models known as "The Don't Take Dick Six" and they were all updating back then with new content. Now, you're going to be lucky to find many sites that are updating on this network. Here's the list of sites that aren't updating and haven't updated in more than a few months:
My single-biggest frustration here is I like softcore content, I like lesbian content, solo content, all of which 21 Sextury made their name with. Of the still updating sites, we have: Asshole Fever, Deepthroat Frenzy, DP Fanatics, Footsie Babes*, Gapeland, Lez Cuties* and Pix and Video*. The ones with asterisks are softcore, traditional 21 Sextury content.
The positive if there is one, I lost all of my 21 Sextury content so I'm back to get the no take dick six content. They are:
Sandy from Club Sandy, Eve Angel, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone, Sophie Moone and Anetta Keys. They do have one of Eve with a man and maybe one of Sandra and Sandy had some close encounters but for the most part, these 6 women either shot with each other or solo. A few others kind of came along too, Zafira, Peaches and Eufrat.
Times change but so does my review score. There's so little here for me once I collect all my lost content, I might have to let it go over into a second month since my ISP is teasing me with 200Mbps and I feel stuck at 100Mbps.
I really don't have a problem with hardcore scenes, anal, I think it all has its place but when 90% of the sites that are updating on the internet are doing anal, hardcore, why would 21 Sextury, once a leader in porn -- start following? I also gave 21 Sextreme a fairly low score coming from me and my score here might not show how I really feel. I'm taking into consideration that there's a lot of porn users out there who haven't ever been a member. They'll love the archives. I only do because Microsoft gave me bad advice on backing up a computer.
The quality is very good. The newest videos have 8 download options from 180p to 1080p. The newer picture sets are hitting around 5000 on the long end and are downloadable. The new models and scenes are fairly impressive. I've noticed Alyssia Kent as a very attractive new model for them but just being honest, she has 4 scenes and all 4 are boy/girl hardcore. Is it too much to ask for a solo scene of her? I know that fans used to get very frustrated with the no take dick six for not doing hardcore but did we really need to go to the opposite pole to make everyone happy? And again, if Brazzers started only posting solo scenes, it would cause an outrage. It's why I do rate DDF quite a bit higher than 21Sextury. The newest scene on Lez Cuties is very good but overall, the newer content is letdown by a followed path from scene to scene.
Despite my ranting, I would still recommend it to those who haven't tried it. Those who haven't tried it will have so much variety to go through but those of us who have been here since 2007, well, we're pretty much watching an old favorite die off. I haven't been on 21 Naturals in awhile. It now comes with 21 Naturals, 21 Foot Art and here you go, 21 Erotic Anal. I think they should combine the three networks, Sextury, Sextreme and Naturals.
At least it will be fun for newer members. I should have put this in the cons too but for those going to the archive (pre-2010), most of those scenes have 720p but some only have 480p.
Let's wrap it up with some numbers:
The 21 Sextury Network has around 18,000 scenes (pictures and video with each scene). I say around because I think they're counting 21 Sextreme and 21 Naturals in that number but there's no way to tell. They also have 4,000 models but that does include males and women who have to be from 21 Sextreme.
Hopefully, you'll read through this before seeing "recommended".
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I'm thinking it's the biggest porn site on the internet.
- It's a DVD site sort of and a separate studio that shoots their own content and that licenses some content that's only available on previously exclusive sites.
- The amount of classic content makes it worth joining. I'll go into that in BL.
- Navigation is pretty good considering how much content they have.
- Download speeds are very good, 80%+ of my max download speed.
- TBP/PU price makes it an even better deal
- Could be a treasure trove for collectors and likewise, could be a good place for newer porn users to start a collection.
- Numbers that are unbelievable in amount of content.
- The original content is on par with most of the big networks like DDF, Reality Kings, etc...
- Updates 4 full DVDs per day and 4-5 updates per week from their original content.
- Will leave you feeling like you got your money's worth.
- 16,500+ models
Cons:
- Well, it can be overwhelming. I think the numbers will show that better than I can say it.
- Here's a real con, the vast majority of the videos that aren't their original content come in all shapes and sizes of resolution. Including some as low as 480p.
- In some sort of strange way, I consider this a con, there's a lot of content on here that was exclusive to other sites for many years. Maybe it just feels like I've spent all those years collecting exclusive content now see a portion of it here in one place.
Bottom Line:
I usually start a review with a lead-in to the expected tone of my review but...
118,552 videos. Over 20,000 DVDs included in that number.
Others have mentioned the connection to Videosz and I can see that too. Some of the videos I've download still have the Videosz watermark on them. But there's also videos from once exclusive sites like DDF and 21 Sextury. Consider me shocked on those two. I thought maybe the DDF content would be a small sampling but it's over 700 videos from DDF.
The studios they have on here are common for DVD sites to have but not in this amount. They have 1,649 videos from Private. And 3,600+ from Eromaxx. Eromaxx is the studio behind Tainster. I do remember Videosz having some of Eromaxx's content for nearly 4,000 videos? More than anything, I'm showing why it's overwhelming even to an old porn digger like me. I have joined DDF, 21 Sextury, Eromaxx/Tainster and been overwhelmed by their sites. Here, they have these studios plus 8 pages of more studios. I would need a year subscription to this site to feel like I covered all of it.
Also of note: When you come to a DDF video on their site, under the video it states it's from DDF and that's on every video that's not exclusive to Bang. I think it's a nice touch because it shows they're not trying to fool anyone.
Their DVDs took up the first 3 weeks of my membership. April Flowers, one of my favorite models to collect, has more content on here than my entire 10 year collection of her has in it. She was a huge star in the late 90s, early 2000s. Charlie from Vivid? She's here. Just name a model, they're here. My all-time favorite model Eve Angel almost always did exclusive content only. She has 30 videos on here.
There is the one big con and that's the varying quality. I'm taking a guess that whoever licensed this content from exclusive sites did so for the original content not any remastered content. Same with DVDs, they are in the original resolution so you will see a lot of 640x480 (the old standard in DVDs) videos but where does the need for quality pass the need for quantity? A good example, the April Flowers scenes, because they are from around 2000, I've never seen them anywhere in any better than 480p quality. So, no loss there but there are DVDs here that I have seen at other DVD sites in better quality.
Over to their original content. They have it separated into sites like most networks do. You get these exclusive, original sites with amount of content out from each:
Bang! Real Teens - 107 scenes
Confessions - 53 scenes
Glamkore - 33 scenes
Bang! Japan - 353 scenes
Casting - 77 scenes
Real MILFs - 7 scenes
Gonzo - 56 scenes
This original content is very similar to what you'll find on the big networks. I will mention that the Japan content is uncensored and as the number of scenes shows it updates a lot.
So, if I were to try and explain what this site is it would go like this ... it's a newer network that has read and heard many complaints about not enough content so they went and added a top-tier DVD site and collection to their site so if you feel there's not enough original content, you can go back and find some DVDs you want or collect favorite models.
I can say with confidence that this hasn't ever been tried, at least not on the scale they are doing it. I do remember a few networks trying to add DVD content to their bonus sections but I would say Bang's non-exclusive content surpasses Videobox and Videosz. Which shows the value. With the TBP/PU price at $17.99, you're getting a DVD site as good as the best DVD sites and an exclusive network too. For some reason, I keep going back to the Japanese content. I have always been intrigued by Japanese models but most of the hardcore or even solo masturbation I've found is censored. Their Japanese content includes uncensored, situational masturbation, like sitting in what is supposed to be a public place with a skirt on. One camera shows the model's face while the other is in front of her skirt, under the table, showing her masturbating in "public". The other original sites they have are good but I have been burnt out on most of the straightforward network content.
My score might not look as impressive to some but I'm putting a personal twist on the score because I don't have the time to go through all this content. I also believe it goes into elevating quantity over quality which has also hurt the DVD sites in my recent reviews of those. If you have the time and patience to go through 122,000 videos and you like current networks like Reality Kings, add 10 points on my score. I did get all the April Flowers content and a couple of other old favorites. I also downloaded 75 of the Japan scenes too. Others will say my score isn't bad and it's not meant to be. This is a good site for anyone. Collectors like me will find content they haven't seen of their favorite models. Others will like the original content. It's deserving of the praise it's receiving.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The extreme side of 21 Sextury, a network with 16 sites, the TBP review only lists 13.
- A little bit of everything from transsexual to lots of older with younger, will break it down in BL.
- Very good download speeds.
- Technical quality is high with 1080p option dating back to the 2010 range. Pictures are also of high quality and downloadable. The last few years pictures are over 5000 long end.
- Not for sure what the regular price is but I used the TBP very good discount of $9.95.
- Not nearly as many models as 21 Sextury but still 1,225 but that does include males too.
- I feel like a broken record on this one, has some very rare scenes of Euro models from the mid-2000s, yes, I had another hard drive problem and need to get those back.
- Navigation is very good for a network.
Cons:
- There's going to be content here that's not for everyone. This can vary from the actions to the models. Which is exactly what I think 21 Sextury was going for with this network. Different is good to me but a lot of people won't like it.
- I feel petty even saying this but their network lists updates for the entire network, there is a sidebar that lists all the sites available but maybe if the scenes had their site name under the preview photo?
- 13 updates in 30 days (May 2018) isn't very good for a network of 16 sites.
- Zoliboy hasn't updated since March 31, 2018, that was my favorite site on this network.
- Only 4 of the 16 sites are updating and a lot of the content on the sites not updating is from pre-2010.
Bottom Line:
21 Sextreme is different. There's transsexuals, 60-70 year old men with 18-22 year old women, 50-70 year old women with younger men, there's fisting, there's gynecology, domination, pissing and one of my old favorites, zoliboy. If you find yourself getting bored with the same content over and over you'll probably like this network.
This different style of porn isn't always for me. My porn interests seem to be from extreme to the other. My ideal porn is a pretty woman stripping her clothes off and masturbating. I rarely get tired of that but when I do, I just blame the model and find a different model. The varied content here is all captured in high quality videos and pictures. They're receiving a bonus 5 points just for having such high quality photosets on what is largely a video site.
I haven't noticed any 4k videos but there's 8 years of videos with 1080p option. I'm still happy with the 720p. Both the videos and pictures are easily distinguishable as 21 Sextury because of their warm colors and lighting.
Here's a list of the sites included. I'll list the active and updating first:
Grandpa's Fuck Teens (every other week) Lusty Grandmas (no set schedule, 7 updates in May)
Old Young, Lesbian Love (every other week) Teach Me Fisting (every other week)
That's it. Zoliboy was updated last on March 31, 2018, so maybe it's just taking a few months off but otherwise, nearly all the sites on this network have stopped updating. I think this shows the lack of updates better than anything, in May 2018, as of the 29th of May, there are 13 updates for May and that's across 16 sites.
Maybe isn't my place to say this but I think it's time to start including these sites with the 21 Sextury network or merging it with 21 Naturals.
The even worse part about these sites that aren't updating is the majority haven't been updated since 2010, meaning, much poorer video quality.
The good, at least for me, is the old content (mostly on Zoliboy) that included the top Euro "softcore" models from the mid-2000s. I had an accidental hard drive erase that deleted all of my 21Sextury, 21Sextreme content which included a very large collection of Eve Angel content. Also Anetta Keys too.
I don't know if I'm right or not and it probably doesn't matter but some of these sites look old DVD content. Also is worth mentioning that not all of the content is exclusive anymore as I've seen some of the 21Sextury content on Bang.com.
If you like old/young porn they seem to be focused on that niche right now but other than that or if you're a dumbass like me and deleted and entire hard drive and need to get some of your favorite content back, there really isn't much going on in this network. I don't know what has happened and do also have a membership to 21 Sextury network but haven't started looking at it to see if it is also dropping off this much. I didn't think I would ever see the day that 21Sextury was only putting out 13 updates in 30 days on an entire network.
The final score is generous since they at least kept the old content that I accidentally deleted and for the high quality photosets. Not for sure I want pictures of a 19 year old woman getting pounded by a grandpa but can't beat the technical quality. If you've never been a member and like the variety then I would recommend it for a month. If you've been here before and downloaded most of what you want, I can't say you're going to find much new.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A value-priced network that now comes with access to Fitness Rooms.
- Comes with network access to 5 sites. They are: Dane Jones, Girlfriends, Lesbea, Massage Rooms, MomXXX.
- Lots of content, the numbers will be in the BL, very good quality video and downloadable photo sets too.
- I want to say it's exclusive content but there might be cross-use on their other sites.
- Navigation is pretty good for a network, things can get confusing and I'll explain in BL.
- Nearly 500 models but that number could be a little high, maybe 25 or so are males.
- Nice surprises in this network, including older Euro models like Eufrat and Zuzanna Z.
- I get the feeling this network is a group of sites that used to be standalone sites, see cons too.
- New scene everyday.
Cons:
- I'm starting with this one because it's the first time this has ever happened to me. The download speeds are all over the place. I noted it on Fitness Rooms too. One day, I'm downloading at near max of 15Mbps, the next I'm barely getting 2Mbps. I have noticed if I download more than one video or photo set at the same time it seems to speed my connection up.
- This is maybe an unfair con, their content that has the older Euro models in it is older content. Not a problem usually, but the network just launched in 2015. The Eufrat and Zuzanna content is at least 5 years old. I'll go more into it in BL.
- Lots of ads. They have the one where an ad appears when you click the back button. Must be looking for the itchy mouse finger us porn users are known for having.
Bottom Line:
This network surprised me. It probably shouldn't since it seems to be owned by Brazzers or whatever their parent company is called. The different genres on here are very good and you'll get enough mix to get to cover most tastes.
The continuation from the pros and cons:
I'm not at all accusing them of recycling. I once even said I thought these big sites should buy up the dying content and slap it on their networks. They aren't trying to fool anyone by releasing an old Eufrat scene as a new update so I can't take away from their score or accuse recycling. Plus, that's good content that many of us have probably long deleted years ago, well, in this case, I had.
The download speed problem is very real. I very rarely have any problems with DL speed consistency but this network really is all over the place in speed. Possibly the content is stored on different servers? Either way, it's very annoying. The ads are almost as bad. I've seen sites that won't let me use the back button but never one that gives me an ad for using the back button.
The network is made up of these 5 sites with brief descriptions and number of scenes: Dane Jones 560 scenes - It's very straightforward boy/girl sex, it's safe to say it's heartcore. It even says "Couple friendly porn". I didn't have much interest in this site. I've struggled with heartcore porn ever since the first heartcore site I joined. For others who like it, the content looks good, high quality, so there's an an obvious audience for it.
Girlfriends 204 scenes - Good, lesbian, young lesbian porn. You're getting the more romantic lesbian porn here, similar to legends like Viv Thomas and DDF. I like it and would even compare it to the newer content on Sapphic Erotica.
Lesbea 494 scenes - Very good lesbian site, this is the one that seems to have some older Euro content but that content was once in very high demand. It's not much different than Girlfriends except they don't stick to teen/younger models on it.
Massage Rooms 422 scenes - It seems like there's a lot of these massage sites and this is like all the other ones. It has both boy/girl and girl/girl scenes. If you like massage porn it's pretty good content.
Mom XXX 424 scenes - This is sort of a mixture of the stepmom walking in and joining and traditional MILF seducing a younger guy. It's good, I would say it's the best site of the network.
As you can see, there's a lot of content, nearing 3,000 scenes but I will say it has the same problem I had with Fitness Rooms. The content is very vanilla, cookie-cutter. Even so, they have a nice selection of pretty models. It used to be common to excuse the actual content for having top models. They have a model on here who I wasn't familiar with named Vanessa Decker, she has 35 scenes on this network alone and for me that content alone would be worth joining for.
The navigation works good unless you're curious. These are the navigation buttons at the top:
Explore - Dropdown that has latest scene, random scene, sites and niches in it.
Models - Explains itself and works good. Live Cams - Explains itself and I avoid.
Promos - These are mostly the sites owned by Brazzers, maybe all even are and the deals are 40% off on most but they claim $29.99 - $39.99 regular price.
Bonus - Has a lock on it. There are bonus channels in this section including whichever one you picked when joining as your preferred bonus channel. I haven't used it because I don't trust it. That lock is there for some reason.
Fuck Now - That's usually how live cams are listed, it bounces me back to the homepage.
The in-content navigation has problems too. You have to left click "download" to get a download box with resolution options, then you have to right-click the one you want and save as. If you left click the resolution you want it streams it. The pictures are very high quality and if you left click the download (resolution) you want, it just starts downloading. So, you're back to right clicking and save as to download the file where you want. I set my browser settings to download to the Sexy Hub folder thinking the left-click would send the pictures there but it didn't, it sent them to my downloads.
Still, for the price and access to Fitness Rooms too, which is a good site if you're into fitness women and fitness clothes on women, it's good enough for a one month join. I don't think it has enough going for it to join much more than a month but if you have a favorite model on here they do have a lot of content of many of the models.
I didn't put it in the cons but should mention, the biller, as expected is ProBiller. I wouldn't have my problems with them that I have if they fixed their "online cancel form". I've been submitting that for over a year only to see "There's a problem with your request please contact customer service." I will say they respond fast to emails about canceling so it's just the hassle of having to send an email to cancel. Good site otherwise.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site about fit women in fitness clothes, including exercising, then having sex.
- My membership includes full access to Sexy Hub network and a MILF channel which I've not found yet.
- Content is 100% exclusive and downloads are allowed, I was concerned it would be one of those sites that asked for more money for downloads but it allows downloads up to 1080p.
- Picture sets with each scene and are downloadable.
- If you just stay on this site, the navigation is simple and easy but once you venture out the Sexy Hub network things get a little confusing.
- I think this niche is underrated. I guess it depends on the viewers geographical area but I see women wearing leggings, athletic clothes, everyday.
- One that might slip by, if it has a clothing niche, the models don't start nude.
- Updates like clockwork, once a week with a video and photo set, site still only has 104 scenes on it as of 5/1/2018.
- Models are very attractive.
Cons:
- Hello ads. When you first login it tries to upsell you a deal, then each time you return to the homepage an ad pops up for 15,000 scenes for $1. Computer programmers have learned how to make the ads "not really" pop-ups so the pop-up blocker won't catch it.
- There's a certain level of cookie-cutter here.
- DL speeds are inconsistent for me. One downloaded at 14mbps, then 3mbps, then 8mbps, then 1mbps. I rarely run into a DL speed problem, so I will see if it straightens up over the next few weeks.
- MBI/Probiller, whether unfair to list them as a con is debatable but I find their canceling process to be annoying (call, email or chat)and it has to be done 3 days before the end of your membership.
Bottom Line:
I had considered joining this site quite a few times in the past. I knew it's a smaller site and knew it's a specific niche but this is one of my favorite niches. I didn't know until I joined that it comes with access to the Sexy Hub network which has some good sites on it too.
My biggest concern was that the videos required further payment to download but they don't. Each video has 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p download options. The 1080p have 6000 bitrate and the 720p have close to 3000 bitrate. The videos are very good technical quality and because of the nature of the content you'll see a lot of brightly colored clothes and backdrops.
I don't know what's going on with the download speed but do think it's just a glitch, possibly on my side, I just downloaded another scene to see how the speed is doing and it's up to 14mbps. That's 80-90% of my max so I'll keep an eye on it to see if the inconsistency returns.
What you're getting here is content of a workout room, gym, fitness club. There are scenes with men and women, usually the typical "gym" scene of the guy training the woman then he lets his hand slide across her butt and then it becomes normal porn, again. I find it fun and kind of humorous to try and guess when the sexual grab happens. You also have lesbian scenes and some of these do try to be more aggressive/dominant but overall it's mostly tame.
It's my way of saying the biggest reason you should join this site is if you're like me and like seeing pretty, fit, young women in their exercise clothes before getting nude. The themes of the scenes don't change much. I haven't watched every scene but I keep wondering if I'm going to find one of a mixed group, maybe like a coed yoga class.
Then ... I saw a model who made me think of a young Eve Angel, her name is Vanessa Decker. They have 7 scenes with her in them and that helped the score a little. The models, from what I can tell, are mostly European which did surprise me and I haven't been a member of a European porn site in awhile, so they're all new to me.
I keep going back to the feeling that they're missing something with the lack of group scenes. One of the scenes, for example, has 8 women at the beginning. They are all dressed very skimpy and exercising in the class/group style. After a few minutes the "class" ends and 5 of the women disappear. Three stay and have sex. Even if those 5 just stayed around and watched, maybe masturbated, I think those type of scenes would be a major boost to this site.
The navigation on Fitness Rooms only is as basic and easy as possible to use. There are 5 pages of scenes, scroll through each page to get each scene. Picture tab is above the stream window. The pictures are very good but it's hard to tell if these are just screencaps from the video. It does look that way because the males are in the photos. If you start using the Sexy Hub network, you have to sign in again and they have quite a bit more content so it becomes harder to navigate. I expect in a few years, a lot of these smaller, newer networks will start combining all their niche sites with their networks.
There are 104 scenes, 136 models (since there are multiple models in many of the scenes) and I could sit here and name off favorites but nearly all 136 would be listed. In terms of model attractiveness, this site reminds me of the early to mid-2000s European boom of models. Add tight exercise clothes and you have a winner for me but it is admittedly, a less-enthusiastic winner than usual. It feels like they have a time limit they're trying to stay within in each video.
Still, I would recommend it for those who like pretty, fit, younger (18-24) models in tight clothes, attempting to convince you they are only there to exercise. I'll also note that when I was joining and saw the offer for an included membership to Sexy Hub that I looked at Sexy Hub and it offers the same deal by adding Fitness Rooms to their membership.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that I thought had died off but is running strong now.
- CCBill as biller, this didn't used to be the case.
- Roughly 1,200 CFNM themed scenes with photos and screencaps as well.
- Over 500 models.
- Download speeds reach 80% of my max.
- CFNM is a genre that touches on multiple niches and it's one of my favorite non-mainstream porn genres.
- Network includes 6 sites with themes they follow: Lady Voyeurs, Little Dick, Girls Abuse Guys, Amateur CFNM, CFNM Games and the flagship site Pure CFNM.
- There's a story to the scenes though don't expect in Oscar-winning acting performances.
- Pictures and screencaps are downloadable and add the same element those add in exhibitionism porn, see BL.
- One of the best navigating networks I've used.
- No set update schedule but they added 17 scenes in March and so far have added 8 in April.
- While the models aren't sold as amateurs except on the one site, I don't hardly know any of these models.
Cons:
- I think CFNM can be a polarizing genre. This network probably makes the clear too with some scenes that include the women using strap-ons on the men.
- The biggest problem is it's biggest strength. It's unique when compared to today's mainstream porn but it also can be repetitive.
Bottom Line:
CFNM has been one of my favorite genres since the first time I saw a CFNM scene. The one thing that can make the scenes better or worse is the acting ability of those in the scene. Most of these scenes are supposed to have a surprised, shocked beginning for the women but probably 50% of the time the actresses overact and oversell their shock and surprise.
The good thing is there's probably more CFNM content on this network than all other CFNM sites combined. All of the big networks have tried CFNM but none are still shooting it and most have under 100 scenes while this network has around 1,200 scenes.
The basis of the scenes is a woman, usually group of women, walk in on a guy masturbating, catch him looking at them while masturbating and their "punishment" for him is to make him finish masturbating while they watch. Lady Voyeurs is probably the closest to how the genre started and I noticed the scenes on it are only 480p, so those really might be the original scenes.
The basis has of course gotten lost which I prefer the new style better. Now, the women catch the guy and help him with 4-5 women giving him a handjob, there's usually that one woman who gets too aroused and turns it into a blowjob and some of the time it will turn into full sex. I was watching a scene and thought "This is what mainstream porn doesn't have in it anymore." And I think that's exactly the attraction to this style of porn. You're going to get tease in it, voyeurism, upskirts, panties, fully clothed with stripping and if I'm guessing if the women can't finish their job with their hand it becomes blowjob and sex.
The pictures and screencaps add a lot. Similar to exhibitionism porn, the stills allow you to see upskirts you wouldn't have seen in the video, the expressions on the women's faces and throw in hard nipples you wouldn't have noticed.
The navigation is very good. Everything is integrated. You can bounce from one site to another with one click, no sign in again. There also is the option of going to a hub-style page that lists all the updates across the network. Somehow they added a model list too and I only mention that because there are multiple models in nearly all scenes. They have done a good job of putting this network together.
I will mention again, there is some content that some might not like but some is also not as bad as the names suggest. Girls Abuse Guys is just soft domination, pretty much what CFNM started out as. There are scenes with the woman or women using strap-ons on the guy. The Little Dick site is a lot like Bang Bros CFNM Show, women laugh and pick on the guy for his lack of size while he tries to get off. You're not going to see anything that's comparable to the rougher dominant male sites.
There is the possibility of the content becoming repetitive, I think this wouldn't be as likely if the acting was better. This still is a relatively rare genre as most of the big networks have all tried CFNM but most feedback from their webmasters was it costs too much, is not that popular but I do believe it's becoming more popular. I did add the numbers in my head and believe if you joined every CFNM site on the major networks you would have around 400 scenes or you can join here and have 1,200+.
I mentioned the network using CCBill, it makes me wonder with the greatly-improved navigation if they've switched owners or management. Also, the 17 updates a month is unheard of on a CFNM site.
It's now one of my current favorites and for the time being it's being added to my FTV/Zishy recurring memberships. Very impressed. Apologies to Mbaya on reviewing the site just a few months after he did but I also agree with his review.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I'm pretty sure it's the biggest porn site on the internet and if not, it's close.
- Depending on your tastes, I find most of the new DVD porn to be similar to what you find on the big networks.
- They've cleaned up a lot of navigation and site issues but more issues have showed up.
- The standard membership gives you a lot of value, especially if you're new to porn.
- Download speeds are very good, going right at 80% and up of my max DL speed.
- Most of the new(er) DVDs are in 1080p resolution.
- Still updating with 5 DVDs per day (average of 20 scenes).
- The biggest pro in my opinion is the opportunity to rack up a huge collection of your favorite stars.
- More genres than they realize they have. I believe the only thing you won't find here is gay male porn.
- Easy to join and cancel with their onsite cancellation process.
Cons:
- The search is back to being broken but not really broken, it's just they now include all their scenes from their add-on channels in your search results.
- I used to not think too much of this but it's becoming a big problem now ... way too many repeat scenes.
- If a person joined all the add-on channels Videobox has they would have upwards of $200 invested in a one month membership.
Bottom Line:
I thought the last time I reviewed Videobox would be the last time but at least one model has caught my attention who I've been collecting scenes of and VB has a large amount of scenes of her. It's also the easiest place to add to your niche interests like handjobs and some CFNM too.
What do you get for updating your porn site with 5 DVDs per day for years? A mess. Videobox currently shows 19,748 DVDs and that's 106,244 scenes. The dilemma you'll find yourself in is there's no doubt you can find something you'll like or maybe even a lot that you like but you will spend a whole lot of time trying to find it all and a lot of frustration.
My current example: I once saw a CFNM scene that featured this unnamed model, the other 2 models were named in it but this other one played the role of the sweet, shy, innocent girl who just watched. I thought she looked familiar but I don't join a lot of sites with the newest models on them. I then found out she's Dillon Harper who is one of the most popular models in porn. Anyway, I looked around for content of her and Videobox says it has 48 scenes of her.
So, I joined a few weeks ago and sure enough, they have 48 scenes of her. That is if you have Videobox, their PornPros add-on channel ($15), their Reality Kings add-on channel (which is where I first saw her), their Evil Angel add-on channel ($15). It might not seem like that bad since you would think those individual studios would maybe only have 2-4 scenes max but here's how it breaks down:
PornPros Channel has 14 of her. Evil Angel Channel has 9 of her. Reality Kings Channel which cannot be joined any longer has 3 of her. Elegant Angel has 1.
So, of those 48 scenes, only 21 are available with a Videobox membership. It gets worse. Of those 21, 3 are the exact same scene listed as Natural Tits #23 scene 8, Don't Get Mad, I Fucked Your Dad #1 scene 2 and Young Freaks #3 scene 2. So, I'm down to 19 new scenes. There's two others that look like they've been doubled.
Meaning I went in thinking I was going to get 48 scenes of Dillon Harper but only got 15-16. As much as I want to keep complaining about this that's still a decent amount for the price but more so than that, it was so time-consuming and frustrating to sort through the scenes that weren't included with membership.
Videobox has and always has had every chance to be a dominant force in porn but the add-on channels are now dying off and they're still asking full price for them. I mean really, $35 a month for a Kink channel? You can join the Kink network for half of that and sometimes for a 1/3 of that and have access to thousands of more Kink scenes. It's not that I'm that bothered by the add-on channels as it is that their scenes are now mixed in the search results. Those add-ons have lowered the navigation of a site that already struggled in navigation.
There are positives including the amount of HD DVDs. They're showing having around 5,500 HD DVDs, that's almost 30,000 HD scenes ... but, those damned add-on channels content are included in those numbers.
I have been frustrated by their insistence to cater to their mainstream porn audience and that's still a problem. They added 10 "handjob" DVDs in 2017 but 4 of those are cumshot compilations that just happen to have handjobs in them. So, they averaged a handjob DVD per 2 months. The same 2 months that saw a total of 300 DVDs added. I think it all shows contentment on their behalf. Videosz made a run at them but they're now struggling and Videobox just sits there with their manipulated numbers to make them look even bigger than they are. Which is something they don't even need to do.
Despite all this negative and frustration, if you know who you're looking for, you can still get more content of them here than almost anywhere else. Here's a few examples:
Tanner Mayes 56 scenes, Alexis Texas 189 scenes, Sophie Dee 164 scenes, Bree Olson 59 scenes, Tori Black 113 scenes, Naomi Russell 134 scenes, Sunny Lane 49 scenes, and Nautica Thorn 165 scenes.
I used those because those are ones I had either deleted or lost and needed to get back. That's a lot of porn. But nearly each one had Evil Angel scenes in their scenes and if you're into the newer models most have Porn Pros Channel scenes in their scenes.
I even found a model who I haven't seen hardly no content of Priva, a Thai model and they have 19 scenes of her but 2 are Evil Angel, which is where I think I first saw her.
What I think is sad is that I can sit here and see all this potential but I know Videobox has been around for nearly 20 years and I have to think if they've not reached their potential after that long, they're not likely going to. I think it would take shutting the site down for a few months and doing major clean-ups to make a positive change even possible. As it is, I join it and have a list ready of who I'm looking for. Still recommended but only for those with patience and who are new to porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Team Skeet network and more importantly, one of the last true amateur Latina sites.
- Still updates but it's sporadic, one a month, sometimes two.
- Pictures and video with every scene.
- 231 scenes as of 3/13/2018, 222 models, not all are amateurs but the vast majority are. You'll even find several pros on here but I'm not familiar with the newer models, most of the pros are in the old content.
- Decent variety in settings, a lot of the scenes start outdoors, in public.
- Site has been around since 2007, it was one of the original sites that predated Team Skeet the network. I remember joining it and Innocent High as a package several times pre-2010.
- Oldest scenes have an odd highest quality of 576p video, since early 2011, 720p and 1080p have been available.
- Download speeds are very good for me.
- The true amateur models. These are some of the best scenes on the internet.
Cons:
- Have to say it again, going to estimate that 15% of models are pros. The good to that is they're some of the best Latina pros like Rebecca Linares, Daisy Marie, Sativa Rose, Renae Cruz and those alone show they are older scenes since none of them have been active for years.
- Ads can be frustrating. I've clicked on an ad three times now but at least they don't charge you immediately.
Bottom Line:
Oye Loca was first introduced to me by Pacino of Pacino's Adventures. Think he said something like, "Fucking assholes" since they were cutting into his niche of amateur Latina models. I had no pity for him, more amateur Latina porn far surpasses pity for a man who wouldn't share his models. That whole paragraph is meant as complimentary to both Oye Loca and Pacino's Adventures.
I know the number doesn't look that impressive, only 231 scenes over 10+ years. On the other hand, it's impressive to see a very hard niche to shoot, continue to be updated for that long. Nearly all other amateur Latina sites are now gone. You'll see a lot of models on here who have no other content on Team Skeet. Which can be frustrating too but it at least shows that a lot of these models were one and done.
The story or depth of the scenes is fairly limited since very few of the models speak English. But amateur Latina models rarely need to talk to give a good scene. Have heard others who shoot Latina porn say "they believe in earning their pay".
In comparing the content to Pacino's Adventures, you did get the feeling that Pacino had closer relationships with his models. I think he tried to marry 3-4 of them. And might have. The authenticity comes through more with Oye Loca since they aren't just putting their pretty Latina friends in dozens of scenes. It's why I once said Oye Loca is one of the most impressive sites on the internet. I'm not for sure where all they shoot but I'm going to guess Colombia, Peru (maybe) and most likely Brazil. Those aren't the safest countries to go running around trying to secure sex from young, pretty, women. A lot of the scenes feature male talent who are Latino. So, there could be some kind of partnership coming into play there.
The odd 576p videos look pretty good. The 720p and 1080p look very good. And even though all Team Skeet sites seem to want you to miss the picture sets and screencaps by naming their scenes as "movies", there are zipped picture sets and zipped screencaps. The picture sets almost always start fully clothed so you get the tease and strip from those.
I know there's been a lot of comments about the poor download speeds but I haven't experienced them. My download speed is around 80% my max. I'm not for sure where they're located but I don't think I'm that close to their server.
The scenes are straightforward. Almost all scenes are between males and a female, either 1 or 2 guys and the female. There are some group with more than one female and a couple girl/girl but the Team Skeet guys are getting their money's worth! I can hear it now, "I had to run from 6 chickens, 2 goats, jump two fences, dodge a street gang, just to get to her front door. Don't tell me she doesn't shoot porn with men."
What you're really going to see are amateur models who love sex. You won't see much shyness or innocence. I think that can be a problem for some. We're very used to seeing young models who are timid or camera-shy.
To me, this site alone has kept me coming back to Team Skeet at least once a year. And for the third time in my 11 years of reviewing porn, I've scored a single site higher than the network it's a part of. Once onto the Oye Loca site you get a search engine that only searches Oye Loca scenes, there are still ads but not near as bad as on the Team Skeet network hub. You even get a model list of all the models who have content on Oye Loca and those results also show how many scenes the model has across the network too.
The only other site that is still around that I would compare to it is Latina Rampage on the Bang Bros Network. Pacino's has been down for a few years. And Latina Rampage updated for about a year before becoming an archive site. So, Oye Loca, to my knowledge is the only Latina amateur site that is specifically focused on Latinas that is still updating. Worth a join for anyone who likes Latinas, for those who want a little more oomph in their scenes and for those who are looking for bouncy, perky teens who perform like they won't ever be able to have sex again.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of those networks that's large, has high quality but seems to be doing everything possible to make their customers upset.
- Unlike a lot of complaints, I have no problems with the speed of Team Skeet, I'm actually downloading from it faster than any site I've been on in the last month (got a speed upgrade from IP).
- It's an overall good deal for what you pay.
- Lots of high technical quality throughout the network.
- Has my favorite amateur Latina site (Oye Loca).
- A very niche heavy network that often times looks like they just changed the scenery and called it something new. If your imagination works good that's even more of a pro.
- Navigation is very good if you can avoid the ads. Hate to see a good navigating network be pulled down by its site layout.
- Updates daily and shows 39 sites but...
Cons:
- You don't get all 39 of the sites and 7 more of the sites that you do get are no longer updating plus 10 of the others are updating at most once per month. Kind of puts a hit on that 39 number.
- I said, in a review of Vivid, can they possibly find anymore room for ads? Yes, Vivid, join Team Skeet, they have figured out how to take up a whole screen with ads except for one small box that takes me to Team Skeet.
- I joined through an advertisement they sent me for Black Valley Girls. Somehow, I didn't receive access to Black Valley Girls. Seems it's an add-on upgrade. To say I'm a little annoyed would be an understatement.
Bottom Line:
I was mainly intending to review Oye Loca as I think it's the best amateur Latina site on the internet but after signing up for Black Valley Girls and finding out I have to pay again to have it, I'm re-reviewing Team Skeet. A network that I've been a big supporter of since before it was a network.
I can only imagine the salary they're paying the programmer who figured out how to squeeze ads onto 95% of a home screen. My feeling towards Team Skeet hasn't changed when it comes to their content. I'm still a perv for those Innocent High scenes, love every Oya Loca update ever posted and they had me hooked with the mention of Black Valley Girls. I like most of their content though I don't care for the rough sites. It's kind of tiring to watch a 6' 220 man slam a 4'10" 87 pound woman around. Don't care if she's okay with it. It's boring. Maybe flip the script and let a 6' 200 pound woman have her way with a 5'5' 110 pound man? Where's the intrigue and mystery in those scenes? I'd even question the male talent's physical strength since they only pick those tiny models up.
Enough on that rant and to another one. Black Valley Girls. Being a native of Southern California, I am very aware of the girls from the San Fernando Valley. They used to tease and arouse us LA guys with their "Like, totally, gnarly, bitchin-rad, gag me with like a totally bent spoon". The idea of black Valley Girls is very intriguing to me. Most that I knew were either the kid of a hippie or when the Chicano boom came in as the farms grew. One day they would be normal. The next day, "Uh, like, duh, totally duh". It was magic! If you was going to be rough with a woman they were the ones! Save us all if women realize annoying a man can be a way to sexually attract him.
But no access to Black Valley Girls. That's along with the other upgrade sites too. It's like a whole new network. They update daily also. You know how I know? Because they list their updates with the Team Skeet updates, so practically every other update is one you can't have without paying more. I'm not even against this upgrade-style. I am against advertising something to me then switching it. For what it's worth, Black Valley Girls only has 17 scenes. And I'm not close to convinced that they have real black valley girls. That would be enough to make me consider moving back.
So, their network score took a bit of a hit since my last review. The amount of ads are terrible. I'm guessing my computer is able to process everything faster than some computers, so I don't see the performance dip but I certainly can see how it could happen. I mean really Team Skeet, your ads make Bang Bros look like saints.
There's good here and I still do plan on reviewing Oye Loca by itself. I've joined a lot of Latina sites over the years. For me, Oye Loca and Pacino's Adventures were the best for amateur Latina models. And both have a lot of silly fun in their hunting of Latina models. I'm not for sure how many more times I can stop myself from laughing when I see a stray chicken go running by. But Oye Loca, at this point, is updating once a month.
That's a regular theme for most of the sites that have been around for awhile. I do wonder if that's going to pick at my OCDC. You have these newer sites that are updating a lot more per site. I even joined one of their upgrade sites, Family Strokes, by itself a few months ago and it was a very good site.
I'll at least give them credit for keeping their content at high technical levels and not charging extra for 1080p.
Still, there was always so much potential with this network and most of that potential has been replaced with ads and email promos that change what you get when you sign up. I took 10 points off my score for taking advantage of my need for Black Valley Girls and for making me put my glasses on to be able to find Team Skeet in the seas of ads.
I'm going to defend that to a point because they at least do have the decency to give you a filter to see just "my content" so it doesn't mix the upgrade updates in with your updates but I'm betting a lot of people miss that filter.
I'll also say they have some new sites that are included with a Team Skeet membership that are good, the TeenJOI one has a lot of potential but only has 2 scenes on it so far. That's Teen Jack Off Instructors. I'll wrap up with a definitive list of what's not included.
Not included: Black Valley Girls, PervMom, Shoplyfter, Daughter Swap, Submissived, Dad Crush, BFFs, Family Strokes and Sis Loves Me.
I could be wrong but I think you have to pay separate for each of those. Only a couple of them even have 100 scenes and a few like Black Valley Girls and PervMom have less than 20.
Seriously guys, I'm into my middle-age years, finding "perv" moms isn't hard. It's a shock they aren't paying you all. It's still a good network for a change of pace from the frantic network wars we are seeing but they have to clean their act up or that score isn't changing.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Making a strong case for the best photo and video porn site.
- The amount of content combined by their current update pace continues to shame even some networks.
- Another of those sites that has a farm growing pretty teens. It's like they never run out.
- Softer than most hardcore sites but harder than most softcore sites, if that makes sense.
- Still updates daily and has been around since 1996. I might make an uncomfortable joke in the bottom line about that.
- If you like slender models this is the site for you.
- Download speeds are very good, about 75% of my max.
- Met-Art boosted the navigation and site design.
- Very high quality throughout the site will cover that in BL.
- Some variety thanks to "helpers" in some otherwise solo scenes, girl/girl and girl group in the vacation scenes. But solo is the focus.
- Very good at capturing the girls personalities which is a lost art in porn these days.
Cons:
- There's so little to complain about that I'm going to have to nitpick. I think all of the Met-Art ran sites are frustrating at sign-up because they transfer you to the login page and send your password to your email. Meaning, if you don't know your password yet, you can't sign in and you get stuck in that lock-up screen "sign-in" box that shakes when you get it wrong.
- Same complaint I've always had and that is while I like slender models as much as anyone, I also like some variety.
Bottom Line:
ALS Scan and ALS Angels are two of my favorite sites of all-time. The funny part is I don't and haven't ever preferred shaven women but these sites require it. I prefer a trimmed triangle, airstrip.
I keep coming back to this site because I still am steeped in solo porn. It's been my favorite since 2004. Most solo sites are tame, very soft and that's even more true in 2018. The difference now is you can't find more than a dozen or so sites with high quality content that is solo. Even when the competition was much more populated than now, ALS Scan was one of my top 3 sites in the genre. I will say that ALS Angels can outscore it for me personally, but ALS Scan has obvious advantages that can't be ignored like the amount of content, update frequency and much improved navigation/site design.
Kind of a funny complaint, I can't count the models because they have so many that they've gone to an alphabetical listing (would take forever) and a "top models" filter that shows a couple hundred. They continue to do things that make me shake my head in disbelief, like:
Daily updates. Shocking enough in this day of age of networks with 36 sites barely releasing one update per day but there are days like February 2, 2018 that had ... 16 casting updates, in one day. Your average porn site these days would release those over 16 days. Some might say those casting scenes are tame since it's mostly a woman taking her clothes off and little else but it's still a photo shoot and for someone who likes seeing a woman in her regular clothes, then naked, it's very good.
I try to always mention the collector side when reviewing the ALS sites since they have been around a long time and have a lot of models many of us have forgotten. A couple of favorites here are Alana (Anetta Keys) and Zuzana (Zuzana Z.). And to show how much content they do have for some models, Zuzana has 46 videos/photo sets. Considering their site has enough models to split their "top models" into a top 200, it kind of gives you an idea of how big the overall site is.
One of those objective opinions I usually avoid. The ALS sites are two of the only sites that I do watch the Behind the Scenes videos from. I know I've groveled over the ALS Angels BTS of Regina Ice becoming genuinely horny but ALS Scan has similar too.
Listing the numbers would take me a month. While I think their navigation is very good, it's not the best in the world for writing a review. If you click "movies" it takes you to a page with 60 videos on it and there's 30 pages of those 60 video pages. But that only goes back to July 2009. If you click "updates" you see that the content is dated back to 2006 AND there's an archive too.
My thinking is they're showcasing the videos that have 1080p options but from what I've seen they have 1080p dating back to January 2008. On the other side, they do have some 4K in the newer videos but I'm not for sure how they're doing that since one update will have it and one won't. Still, over 2,000 videos in 1080p.
They've always stood out to me because of their picture sets. They not only will push the 5000 long end side of pictures but also will include anywhere from 150-500 photos in a set. These are not screencaps from the videos, they are separate photo shoot photos.
Which leads to another objective opinion. I prefer their shooting style as they don't go and try and to create this porn looking area for the photos or videos. The makeup is light or natural and the clothes really look like what the model most likely showed up in. I used to prefer glam and do still like it but I prefer this more natural style now.
If you like slender models and you've never been a member, you should plan on staying longer than a month or else you're going to be overwhelmed with the amount of content. The scenes are typically longer than a lot of solo sites as there's usually a full strip and tease, some talking, and by the way, ALS won me over way back in 2008 with a scene with Anetta Keys. She, like many Euro models, usually won't talk much but they had her talking more than I've seen and they do that as well as anyone. The only sites I've seen that have as good of a relationship with the models are Twistys (when Shap was there, not anymore), Pacino's Adventures (think it's shut down now), one I've mentioned before and who has worked ALS, Zoliboy's old site and last is FTV. You miss out on that interaction with the model on 98% of sites these days. I thought the recent Liza Rowe one was cute when she noticed bees. While it won't top Eve Angel's once slapping of a fly on her thigh, while masturbating, it's still fun to see the normal moments.
One cross-sale to avoid but it's easy to avoid and it's to Met-Art, they would take care of it if you missed it. My score is only lower than before because I've adjusted my scoring scale. For me, it's the best of the slender solo models sites, so if one of mine is higher it's just because I've not updated it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of porn's most prominent studios. A long-history of porn with a plot and parodies of mainstream movies plus you get their celebrity collection if you're into that.
- They have started allowing downloads.
- I'm confident that every major porn star (prior to 2010) has at least one scene on here.
- Navigation is pretty good, it has to be or else I would lower the score a lot for the hassle the site puts up.
- Though it might not look like it, there are full DVDs here, you just have to search by title to find all the scenes for each.
- I'm going to put this with a slight asterisk, download speed has been very good but I downloaded a couple of the older scenes earlier and wasn't even getting half my regular download speed, possibly on a different server?
- This is a strange pro but there's lots of non-facial cumshots!
- Major stars have lots of content and short-lived Vivid stars do as well. April Flowers has 51 scenes, I didn't know she filmed that many scenes.
Cons:
- Oh for fuck's sake, could you figure out how to squeeze one more ad onto the site? No joke, there are 16 individual ads on a page, most are chat models, others are for Vivid penis pills and one huge one at the top of the screen about how to get 120 free chat tokens. To put this all into perspective, this is on a model's page. It shows 8 equal sized scenes by the model with 16 ads.
- The rarely seen SBW biller, seems easy enough to cancel but haven't seen them in years.
- While it doesn't bother me, scenes have been removed from the stream-only days. For me, there's enough of the classic content to offset this but definitely some are missing.
Bottom Line:
Tired of watching loud-mouthed guys who sound like squealing pigs when cumming? Try some Vivid! Back to the days of Tom Selleck mustaches, old-school Oakley blade sunglasses and Zubazz pants. Call it cheesy but the women and action are hotter than today's porn.
Two girls with a guy and one girl dodges the cumshot? Not here. One of the favorite hobbies of Vivid watchers is to see how often the would-be dodger gets hit on the cheek by a cumshot aimed at the other woman's mouth. April Flowers, just known as April on here is one of my favorite porn actresses of all-time. She's a Latina who lied about her race because Latina wasn't a genre in the late 90s, early 2000s, she even used the April Flowers and April Rain name to try not to show her Latina background. The only problem was her Latina backside couldn't help but show as she wiggled, grinded and twisted it to humble every man Vivid threw at her. As the old saying goes, she didn't even look the part. One of those cum dodging threesomes features April and a younger Raylene than current porn fans know. Raylene supposedly loved having cumshots on her belly and boobs, April wasn't feeling the scene since she was mostly just watching, she's laying there and the cumshot hits her chin and arm. According to lore, she filmed the "Marissa" scene the next day and made the guy cum four times. Maybe that's what made the late 90s, early 2000s Vivid porn so good?
April, Kobe Tai, Asia Carrera, Taylor Hayes, Raylene, Shelbee Myne, Charlie, Charlie Angel, Sky Lopez, a very young Belladonna and Zara White, just off the top of my head, seemed to be constantly competing with each other. You got nearly perfect performances from them in every scene.
I joined this site back about 5 years ago to get the scenes the Vivid channel on Videobox didn't have but it was stream only. One of my all-time favorite DVD series is "The Watcher", it's what it says, a voyeur watches two or more people have sex. It was revolutionary for its time (90s-2000s). One of the more memorable scenes was Charlie and some guy sneaking into a prison, they start to have sex and this guy appears, just watching, it seemed to kick Charlie into another gear. They still have those on here for download. Those alone are worth the price.
But also being able to download scenes of my favorites who I haven't seen content of for download is a huge plus too.
As impressed as I am with the content that is available, there's a chunk of content missing too. I don't see it as a huge negative simply because I'm happy to just get these scenes I hadn't been able to download.
In my pros I said the navigation is pretty good and it is. How else could you find anything among the ads? The model search works but that always falls back on the person knowing who they're looking for. Doing DVD title searches also works but again, you have to know what you're looking for.
After that, the navigation is bad. And the site layout plays into that. They've also taken liberties with renaming models. April Flowers is no longer that, she's just April. Raylene's various last names have been removed as have Charlie's which makes it confusing because there's also a Charlie Angel, the name Charlie sometimes used except it was Charlie's Angel.
Navigation also makes it very hard to come up with a definitive number of scenes. They have as many as 20 on title searches and there's no numbers on how many pages there are. Instead, you just click an arrow and it loads the next 20. All of this could be improved. Throw in the old biller and the 2 pre-selected cross-sales with 2 more upsale ads showing up before allowing me into the member's area and these things alone are taking 10 points off the score.
Many of these scenes are nearing 20 years old. They have a 1080p download option on all. They also have a 720p and SD option. I downloaded some 1080p of April's old scenes and the properties say 1920x1080 but they're not. For one, the scenes are 4:3, so there's a black box around each side and for two, the bitrates on the 1080p are only in the 4,000 range. Before throwing them under the bus, these do look better, cleaner than the Vivid Classic scenes I have from Videobox. So, maybe they've done all they can with them and that's good enough for me. You can even see in the filesizes (most 1080p at 500-600 MB), that these are not 1080p scenes.
Still, where are you going to get these great scenes? I've been through a lot of porn, moving it, deleting it but I've never deleted a single scene from my Vivid folder. One last warning is the site is overwhelming with the ads, the questionable search, so I do think if they cleaned up all these site layout and navigation problems they would have a really great site. As it is, for collectors and curious ones, it's a great find. A couple of longtime favorite scenes: April and Raylene in House of Lies #3, April and Raylene again in Bad Wives #2 and the aforementioned April in Marrisa.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the very best all-around network on the internet.
- Comes with 13 sites, and those 13 sites include at least 8 sites that at one time were successful standalone sites. Eight of the sites are still updating and 5 are fairly listed as "Archive" sites.
- The navigation in its newest iteration blows other networks away. Will further in BL.
- Download speeds are very good, about 70% of my max.
- Averages a new update per day across the network.
- The amount of content across the network is reaching hard to believe levels.
- Ready for this one? Over 2,500 models. And some have over 100 scenes.
- DDF, the producer Denys DeFrancesco, helped create "Leg sex" and is one of the most copied producers and photographers in internet porn history.
- The network itself covers nearly every genre. It's the closest I've seen to complete.
- House of Taboo is maybe the best mainstream accessible kink/BDSM site on the internet and it's included.
Cons:
- Two checked cross-sales sit directly over, "Yes, I am 18".
- Being used to American porn can cause a slight problem here since most of the models don't speak English. The good side to that is the men aren't talking at all in the scenes.
Bottom Line:
There really isn't much at all to complain about here. I've evaluated my last 10 years of porn sites and can say this one easily is in my top 3. I like several of the American networks but DDF has consistently been working on their navigation and for me they've hit a good spot with it. Navigation on a site this large is very important.
I'm going to get the numbers out of the way since they're distracting.
- 2543 models
- 15,161 scenes, each scene comes with a video and zipped photos.
That's a lot of porn. I always thought DDF's biggest strength could also be seen as their biggest weakness. They have variance in their network sites. When you look at most networks the sites really aren't that different, they change a setting, add a few twists to the storyline and call it a different site. The DDF network isn't like that. You have sites that still focus on solo girls, posing, teasing, masturbating. Then they have a couple of lesbian sites. Throw in a couple of hardcore sites. And a kink/BDSM site.
I think for DDF's experience to be understood, one has to consider how successful these sites were as standalone sites. I know at one time, on PU's parent site TBP, three of the sites included here were in the top 10 of overall review scores. I can tell you I paid $29.95 for One By Day, for Hot Legs and Feet and for Euro Girls on Girls. I don't remember what the standalone price was for Eve Angel Official but I paid whatever it was.
I do think that separates it from the American networks. And if it's not known, you can actually still join the sites in DDF Network by themselves for a reduced price.
I can't say I've ever really liked Hands on Hardcore but that's mainly because at this point, I really don't like most hardcore.
The archive sites should be mentioned since these are most likely aimed at collectors. They include Cherry Jul, Sex Video Casting, Eve Angel Official, Sandy's Fantasies and Hairy Twatter. Sandy's Fantasies for those who are curious is the lovely Zsanett Egerhazi aka Sandy from Club Sandy. This content of Sandy is from the earlier years of her career and features one of the most viewed Euro lesbian sets of all-time, it's Sandy vs Sophie Moone, two of the most popular Euro models of the Euro porn boom in the mid-2000s. They were also a part of the group that I once called, "The no take dick six". That name came from watching multiple interviews of Eve Angel, Sandy, Sophie, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone and Peaches. Their English or lack thereof led most to answer, "What's the most you'll do on video?" with, "No take dick, no, no."
While I'm having fun at their expense, they were the models who interested me the most. I couldn't understand how 6 European models who were from Hungary could have that much power over their scenes.
And if you like them, they have over 500 scenes just of those 6.
The big change that led the network to a 98 is the navigation. I don't think many people question the quality of content at DDF but the navigation has been really bad in the past. You could click something and end up on Google, bad redirect urls, dead links, it was terrible.
Now, as of 2/6/2018, you sign in to a hub. Across the top are the names of the still updating network sites. The hub itself shows all updates to the network. Say you want Hands on Hardcore. Click it and the hub reloads with only Hands on Hardcore content. Not good enough? Go directly to "sites" and pick your favorite, you now have a brand new search engine that will just search within that site's content. And you can just search through models and see all their content.
So, why the -2? I didn't put it in cons since it's a minor problem and not to make fun of DDF's tech group but every time they try to fix something, they break it! If you want to go to one of the archive sites you have to sign in one time. It doesn't move seamlessly to them like it does the active sites. That's pretty minor so I took 2 points off for those cross-sales and the biller is Vendo, who I haven't ever had a problem with but those cross-sales could easily be re-checked if trying to click the age consent.
Other negatives aren't worth taking points off like older content not being HD, that's accepted at this point and I'm afraid if we keep complaining about it they're going to start removing it.
Even with my high score, I don't join DDF Network more than twice a year. I mainly focus on the 1byDay, Hot Legs and Feet and House of Taboo content and have all the archived content already on a hard drive. I really think at least 4 of these sites deserve a standalone review but will probably limit it to 2-3 of them.
The active sites are: 1byDay, Euro Girl on Girl, House of Taboo, Hot Legs and Feet, DDF Busty, Only Blowjob, Hands on Hardcore and Euro Teen Erotica. There's still an emphasis on glam but it's why I just join twice a year. I still like glam to a point and they are shooting the best solo sets.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Quite possibly the longest-running solo model site on the internet. Earliest content is January 2003.
- Offers genre diversity that's usually not seen in a solo model site.
- Still updating but the updates are only 2-3 times a month.
- Navigation is okay as this is a large site but it could use some cleaning up.
- If you like big-boobed blondes you'll like Wifey.
- Download speeds are very good, right at 70-80% of my max speed.
- I would go as far as calling the content some of the most authentic I've seen.
Cons:
- I think this goes above the other cons. Everything could use an updating. The site, the navigation, the tabs and it could be made more efficient.
- The majority of scenes are of either Wifey and her husband or her husband and another woman. I think is probably hit or miss since if you really like Wifey it's a good thing. I do like her but only one solo model hasn't ever been able to get my full attention so the content does become repetitive.
Bottom Line:
It's hard to say too much negative about a model who has been in porn as long as Wifey has and it's probably risky to talk too much about how long that's been too! I'll start this review by saying I mean everything positive. There are no jabs at age.
I'm taking a slightly different route than usual because I think the negatives with this site kind of take away from the site. Starting with the wonky navigation and programming. On the main screen there are 5 tabs across the middle-top. Those are "Store", "Contact", "Friends", "Classics" and "Miscellaneous". I normally wouldn't even visit the store but for the review it shows scenes that can be bought for $19.95 each. No clue what the purpose is. The contact tab is emails to contact them at. Friends, to me, should be eliminated. I clicked on 6 different ones and instead of it being content to view, it takes me to the friends solo site. Classics has one scene in it. Miscellaneous has about 20-30 cartoon drawings and another tab for "sounds". Clicking sounds open a new page but it redirects back to the home page. That's 5 useless tabs to me. Up in the upper right hand side of the screen is Wifey's Blog which she still does update. Beside of it in the far-right margin is Wifey's Galleries. How can a site take up 75% of their space with tabs and content that most Wifey fans won't even look at? Of note, there are "video" and "photos" tabs under those useless 5 tabs but I didn't even notice them until 3 weeks into the membership. It seems that would only take basic changes to fix all that. Put Wifey's content right there in the middle.
Now that my OCDC is finished complaining there's the good parts. What you have with this site is what feels like something that started out innocent enough. The oldest content dates back to January 2003. I don't know which one came up with the idea of making a site as Wifey seems to love all aspects of it and her husband is benefiting like Ryan Madison (Kelly Madison's husband). I would compare the content to Kelly's sites.
I haven't watched every scene but every scene I have watched has both Wifey and her husband in it in some way. There are scenes that her husband has sex with other women. Scenes where she has sex with other men. But a large portion is her and her husband together. This leads to that second con. Eve Angel kept my attention for several years as a solo model but even Eve started to fade. To think Wifey has been doing this for 15 years is worth 5-10 bonus points. Not just because of the years but because she is still very attractive. She still has the same excited personality for sex. She's playful, even silly and that is why the bonus points are there. She comes across as very genuine.
Here's what she excels at: Dressing sexy, this is a lost art. I would even say dressing slutty. You can tell by her content and how she releases it that she really enjoys being pretty but not in an arrogant way. Exhibitionism, way back in her earliest content she's outside, out in public, flashing her huge boobs and showing excitement and arousal from it. She still does in her newest exhibitionist content. Handjobs/blowjobs, I'm combining those because she does. What seems to start as a handjob turns into a blowjob because of her excitement. Sex, I would compare her closely to Eva Angelina. Its not her best "skill" (that didn't feel right). But she gives a lot of effort and is down here just because the other skills are very good.
Amount of content as of 1/30/2018 is 590 videos and 602 photo sets. That's a lot of content for a solo model. The photo sets are available in downloadable zips. You also get most of the videos in 720p but there are no 1080p options on those and the oldest videos are 320p. I'm not taking much off for those since they are over 10 years old but did want to mention it.
This is where the review becomes more difficult. Is it worth a join? For me it is. I still have trouble finding newer porn that I really like and the first sites I joined 15 years ago were solo model sites. In most cases Wifey wouldn't be the type of model I'm into it. Her boobs are something like 38DD and I'm usually indifferent to boobs. She's slender which usually doesn't attract me either. She's blonde, that's not going to hurt much since I do prefer brunettes but her hair is pretty. She has a very 90s California look to her. I think she's from Oregon which is close enough. Convincing me she's genuine fixes everything. Her most genuine is when she's doing exhibitionism.
I would recommend it to those who are into exhibitionism. Those who are into solo models and don't need a lot of variety of models. I'll even say those who like handjobs. She's one of those models who you can tell really enjoys giving them. These are all pluses for me and makes this one of my favorite solo sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that still is trying to reach its potential but is held back by poor management.
- They used to advertise 100% amateurs which wasn't true and while I don't recognize many of the newer models, I can't verify they are amateurs. I can say their shooting style makes you think the models are amateurs. It's not a putdown. They don't pile makeup on the models, a lot of sets have selfie-style pictures and the girls come off as normal girls not pornstars.
- 14 sites that have a niche they cover from lesbian, to bisexual girls sharing their boyfriend to the almost amateur I Know That Girl to public/outdoors. Good production values throughout.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Excellent picture sets that are downloadable and 2000 long end.
- Network as a whole averages over 1 update per day.
- Also, like the models mostly bringing an amateur feel, the settings, everything that goes into the scenes feels like everyday life instead of a porn shoot.
Cons:
- The important one. You have to pay $9.95 for VIP access or else the membership is the same as a limited trial membership. With the standard $19.95 membership you can look at any set and stream the videos but no downloads and maybe the funniest, you get VIP customer support when you pay the extra. As much as I wanted to drop a 58 on them, I don't plan on returning and I would think if a person likes their content enough they won't mind paying the extra $9.95. I do think they should lower their standard price to $9.95 if they're going to require you to pay again for downloads. I took 5 points off the score but could see it being a dealbreaker for some.
- As with any of the American-based networks there's a bunch of goofs talking in a lot of the scenes.
- Pro-Biller, cross-sales
Bottom Line:
Mofos has been one of my favorite networks for years. I like their style a little better than Reality Kings, Bang Bros, Brazzers, they create more of a reality feel than those sites and the models are some of the prettiest in the world.
Here's what you get with the $9.95 VIP upgrade: Access to over 2,000 Teen Pink videos, the ability to download all of Mofos content, VIP customer service, access to the Mofos Vault and some kind of stamp on your screenname if you post a comment.
I think it's worth it at least in my case. My entire Mofos collection was wiped out about 3 years ago. They have two public/exhibitionist scenes of Jynx Maze that I would pay $30 for. I do think it prices itself out of the recommend for anyone recommendation. For collectors who have a few favorite models it's easily worth it.
What Mofos does is take tried and proven methods of everyday girls (selfies, mirror pictures, etc) and has the model do things like those. It can at least help your brain get into fantasy mode. They also offer niches that aren't that common anymore. The sites you get with your membership are:
* = still updating.
Video Blog (130 scenes) - It's kind of like interviews except the models get nude and some play with themselves.
Mofos Live (14 scenes) - As with other networks, a great idea that they stopped doing.
She's a Freak (387 scenes) - Fisting, weird insertions, etc...
B-Sides (66 scenes) - Little bit of everything including some public. Stranded Teens* (156 scenes) - Hitchhiker porn, kind of a car take on Bang Bus, most scenes are in the cars, some spill out into the streets. Real Slut Party - (256 scenes) - Multiple women having sex with multiple men and each other. Latina Sex Tapes* (292 scenes) - One of the few updating Latina "amateur" sites, only does one update per month but the scenes are good.
Let's Try Anal* (293 scenes) - Self-explanatory. Public Pickups* (296 scenes) - Public sex similar to most, guy offers money, girl gets naked in the grass or on the concrete.
Pervs on Patrol* (421 scenes) - Spying, peeking, turns to sex, fun site.
I Know that Girl* (452 scenes) - The flagship site that brought their earliest attention. Teens, early 20s models, tease, take selfies, then have sex.
Don't Break Me* (87 scenes) - Tiny women.
Share My BF* (47 scenes) - Bisexual girls having sex with a guy.
Ebony Sex Tapes* (24 scenes) - Newer site that shows tons of potential, very pretty and sexy black girls.
Girls Gone Pink* (14 scenes) - Lesbian sex.
Mofos Lab* (2 scenes) - Brand new site that might have the most potential, there's some public in it, some light BDSM, some POV, looks like they're going for the multiple-genre.
Maybe you can see why Mofos stands out? It's a network that actually has more sites updating than not updating. They also are adding those newer sites that fill in the niches well.
In some ways, I could almost justify paying the full price just because there's a lot of new content and varied genres being covered. Here's the numbers:
2,980 scenes across the basic network access with a total of 3,500 if you pay the extra for VIP and you also get a bonus 5,000 non-exclusive scenes with VIP too. All of the Mofos content is exclusive.
For the rest of the bad since it's looking like this network could have made a run at a 100. Pro-biller is their billing agent. I have learned to deal with their practices but they're actually worse here. You get the typical stupid one when signing up that nearly duplicates the site's name like this: Yes, I want access to MofosPlus for $2, no, I don't want this great deal. After you've made it through that one, instead of going to Mofos homepage, you land on a special offers page and it has one trial checked, you have to submit beyond the page or else it won't move forward. Just uncheck the one and make sure not to check the other 3. Yes, 4 cross-sales. Once on the site you can upgrade to VIP and unlock the above listed bonuses including downloading access and they have another "upgrade" that gives you access to more sites. I'm honestly afraid to click it!
It's a shame. This could be one of the strongest networks in porn. It has a clean interface, navigation is excellent, models are all well-above average. The picture sets come with all scenes and are photo shoot style not screencaps. Usually includes 15-30 pictures of the model in her regular clothes, bending over, etc
They do a good job at updates, keeping their sites alive, I Know that Girl has been around since 2009. The large amount of public content also helps a lot with me. It wants to be the network that someone says, "That's how you do a network!" but frustrating business practices stops that. I recommend but only if you do the VIP upgrade.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best MILF/GILF site on the internet.
- Ran by the same people who own Nubiles, lots of similar features here.
- Very clean site layout and easy to use.
- The amount of content will make your eyes bug out of your head.
- Updates similar to Nubiles, a new model comes along and they post 3-4 videos a week of her and 3-4 photo sets of her.
- One of my biggest complaints with Nubiles is one of Anilos biggest strengths, these ladies aren't shy or innocent, they just want you to watch them masturbate or have sex.
- Download speeds are very good, getting around 80% of my max speed.
- This might be a con to some, not all of these women look older and I like that. I think the youngest I've seen is 26, quite a few 29-30 and some of those don't look any older than "teen".
- The best part, I don't think the majority of these models are pros, there are some, but most look like your neighbor.
Cons:
- Finding promos for Anilos can be frustrating, I don't think hardly any site these days is worth the old premium price. Luckily, I joined during the TBP/PU Holiday Sale. I know their webmaster talked about a Nubiles/Anilos combo offer, but I haven't seen it yet.
- It comes with the territory, some of these models are just not attractive to me, mostly it's the ones with gray hair. I'm not even attracted to young women who have colored their hair gray.
- Some will see this as a big con, there's not much outside solo masturbation sets, I think from the looks of it, they're updating about once a month with some hardcore, but I would say 80-90% of the content is solo.
Bottom Line:
I remember joining this site when it was first opening. That was 10 years ago. Which means I was in my early 30s and really hadn't ever thought about an attraction to older women. The good news is, most of these models are 29-42 and they look like someone's wife or neighbor. I ran out of room in the pros so I'll add this here:
One of the biggest strengths of this site is a lack of implants and tattoos. Some do have them, but you don't see a lot of it.
The humorous part for me is coming from Nubiles where I think the innocence, the shyness, timidness can be a bit frustrating then you join Anilos it's like a completely different world! The ages and rules have changed. Probably the funniest is the highly-entertaining Aaliyah Love who comes off as timid and shy and innocent. And we all know better. I think that's just her thing she does.
The models here, in most cases, seem to genuinely love the idea of being filmed, photographed in sexy clothes and nude. You get the feeling that a lot of these women are probably at the point in life where they're maybe not feeling as sexy as they used to and the camera comes on and they light up.
For review's sake, this age range is my preferred age range. I struggle some with the 18-19 year models and don't like the much older models. There's a middle ground here and it's rare in porn sites these days. I can't imagine what Anilos goes through to get this many women in an older age range.
They also start every scene with fully clothed model, she strips, she teases and if you pay attention, you can see their sensuality coming out. That makes porn good to me. It's like seeing a woman empowered instead of the teen sites which make me feel like I'm being an old perv.
Let's do some numbers, it shocks me how much this site has grown:
530 models as of 1/9/2018
2,300 videos
2,400 picture sets
Anilos like Nubiles uses a standard shoot method with each model. It typically is 5 videos and 5 photo sets. It can vary slightly, but if you like a model, you'll almost always have 5 videos and 5 photo sets. These do include an interview video too. Some are actually pretty good.
The models don't have a lot of variety in race, but there's plenty of variety in body types from chubby to slender, and the nationality is covered pretty well. A lot of American women so you like hearing the English language, they do that, some UK, quite a few from Europe, it's hard to complain about race mixture since it is a limited group of models available in their later years.
Starting in November 2013, they started having a 1080p option on all videos. Prior to that, they have a 720p top option on every video dating back to 2008. They also include around 100 photos per set and these are high-quality, varying between 2400 high end and 3500 high end, they are not screenshots or taking from video, they are photo shoot quality photos. These can be downloaded in a zip file.
I think I have the same problem I sometimes run into with Nubiles, it feels samey from one scene to another. These "older" women add some life to the scenes, but if you've been a member of Nubiles, you understand what I'm talking about. It's not anything that I could recommend a way to fix, but it is also about the only real negative I can find with it.
I actually prefer that the models are doing solo masturbation. That's where you really see them light up, all the focus is on them. I'm sure Nubiles gives them what's equal to a makeover and you can just see them wanting to come out of their shell. I even think this is a very positive site in terms of of a woman's image of herself.
The hardcore shoots are dull to me. I think it removes the spotlight I've talked about. I'll always take sensuality over sex when it comes to porn.
Their update schedule is good, 3-4 scenes per week, each comes with a video and photo set. I kind of thought some bonus sites might be added, but if they are, I can't find them. I'm not saying bonus sites are needed, but Nubiles has several so it might make sense to include those bonus sites over at Anilos too. I'm mostly talking about those sites that stopped updating like Driver XXX.
Would also like to see more promos of Anilos, especially in combination with Nubiles and the Nubiles network. I thought I had one, but it was Nubiles and FTV. I don't think it's a site that would be a common join, maybe 2 times a year. The files are generally small compared to a lot of porn these days, especially if you prefer 720p.
It's a very good site and I think it's even a fairly rare site since I've seen "older" sites that are filled with porn stars, while this really looks to be mostly amateurs. I would recommend it to those who like tease, some of these women talk dirty, those who like their porn to start out dressed and those who like the MILF-aged models. It has a fairly high appeal factor, I think. And it is easily the best in its class.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Still a unique site that has seen its better days.
- Women wrestling. Stripping each other's clothes off. Force-groping each other. Fingering each other for "points".
- If you're a Dragon Lily or Isis Love fan, then that's a major pro for this site as there's lots of content of them.
- Kink quality and overall experience, lots of scrolling, slightly hidden tricks (see comment didn't fit in BL), access to the Kink network and its near 50 sites.
- This should have been my top pro. The live content. It blows away the studio content. See cons.
- Zipped pictures are back, 1200 long end, but at least they're back.
- More content than you'd believe. As of 12/24/2017: 975 scenes.
- Good download speeds, about 75% of my max.
- Navigation is a con if you're new. If you've been here awhile it's not bad at all.
- Site updates once a week, network updates 3 times a day.
Cons:
- That live content hasn't been added in a long time. To the best I can tell, the last live "match" was in August 2016. If I shared my 10 favorite scenes from this site all 10 would be live matches. I'll go more into those in the BL.
- As is the norm with Kink, the highest quality videos are 720p, which I prefer anyway, but could be a turn-off for others. Should mention that most of their scenes are in the hour or longer range, so anything over 720p is going to be a huge file.
- They're having a hard time replacing old favorites on Ultimate Surrender.
Bottom Line:
I first heard of or saw Ultimate Surrender content on an old TGP site back over a decade ago. It looked interesting. I have a fairly-long background in martial arts, even dating back to before anyone had heard of UFC. The premise of the site, in the old days, was unplanned, unscripted, "wrestling" matches. Think more like MMA or Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu or in even more specific terms -- grappling.
I didn't have the best experience talking to one of their producers back in the mid-2000s. I found it insulting to claim unscripted. It's obvious, we're going to compare this to pro wrestling, which doesn't even try to claim unscripted. I felt it showed dishonesty and in turn, I don't do business with dishonest companies.
To understand my frustration with it, I know one of the models, went to high school with her in Los Angeles. She's one of the sweetest, most-artsy, least-athletic women I've ever known. And for most of her match, she dominated her opponent. There is a point with a site like this that fantasy has to go away or else it's not that interesting for 2/3 of each scene.
Kink started growing and while they still threw out the word "unscripted", they obviously followed the lead of professional wrestling and developed "heels" and "babyfaces". Dragon Lily played a major role as a heel. A fairly well-trained grappler with a great traditional female build and she would wipe out her opponents. Then they'd find someone who would come in and beat Dragon Lily. They even expanded the Dragon Lily streak of dominance by having her dominate men. I personally would be up for that role.
Which is important to my review. I like dominant women. I don't care if it's scripted either. They later brought in Isis Love, who was as good maybe better than Dragon Lily at the top "bad girl" role.
They then decided to try something new. The matches were becoming stale. All were held in the same room of the Kink Dungeon or whatever it's called. Two women usually grunting (not sexually), skin slapping in a completely quiet room.
They brought in a live crowd. Completely changed the way these scenes are viewed. And these weren't crowds of other porn stars. There's older women, older men, middle-aged people, look like random people off the street and they all watch and respond as these women grapple and try to grope each other. They could have produced one live scene a month and I would have loved it. Even with no other updates! Just 1 live one a month, but they only did the live scenes for a short period of time.
The numbers of this site aren't much to talk about. They're impressive: Nearly 1,000 scenes and all roughly lasting 45 minutes or so. The 720p videos, for whatever reason, Kink does a great job at filming, look crisp. But that's really all there is to talk about the site except the concepts and gimmicks (live).
To show the continuity they formed with certain models: Dragon Lily's first Ultimate Surrender match was posted on August 10, 2004. She stayed active in the matches through April 1, 2014 and made a one-time comeback in 2015.
To a lesser extent:
Isis Love's first match was posted on February 8, 2005 and her last match was posted on September 3, 2013.
My favorite scene was Isis' return. She had been away for awhile. It's a live scene. She's in the crowd as a spectator and I didn't even realize it was her at first. She starts squeezing her thighs together as she's watching the women wrestling. She ends up being involved as one of the wrestlers is made to flirt/tease her. This drops the sexual action right into the middle of the crowd. It was like Kink's Public Disgrace site except it was to most viewers, a non-porn star spreading her legs in front of strangers. One of my all-time favorite scenes from any site.
Which explains the 83. No live scenes in over a year and those live scenes, while "live" weren't like the live scenes from I think 2011-2014, the newer live scenes are back in the same dull room just with a row of people sitting off the side of the wrestling mat. The older live scenes were much higher energy and the crowds reactions were big pluses.
And the 83 is because the newer models just aren't as believable. It's like watching a lesbian scene that has 30 minutes of fluff at the beginning. I hate using wrestling terms, but there's no "heat", meaning, the competition, even scripted, is no longer there. Daisy Ducati does a good job in her matches, but she seems to be about getting off as much as getting the other woman off. Which is a selling point of a site like this. Isis, Dragon Lily, they would finger, strap-on the woman they beat and stop when she started to orgasm.
It's still worth the price since you can still download all those older scenes, including all the live ones, but currently, it updates once a week and the updates are interchangeable. Having been about as negative as I'll be in a review, I still will say the Kink Network is the best deal in porn.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
