Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A relatively old amateur network that has a ton of content and very collectible scenes as well.
- Comes with 22 themed amateur sites.
- Two updates per day, check the Bottom Line on this pro.
- Quite a few major stars before they were major stars.
- Excellent TBP/PU price of $9.95 (5/9/19)
- Probably the broadest range of women you will ever see on a network, heavy, slim, white, black, brown, ugly, pretty, tattoos, implants, kind of like walking down a street in the United States!
- There is a fine line between simple navigation and layout and outdated. It definitely looks outdated but the site works very well and is easy to use.
- Very good download speeds (80% of max)
- Videos are very good technical quality, up to 1080p, some explanation needed in BL. Also has photos on most scenes and can be downloaded.
- Tagging system is pretty good but it might be too vague. It still is helpful.
- Covers most interests in hetero porn.
- 100% exclusive
Cons:
- It looks outdated, like 2004 outdated but it really isn't bad. It does feel cluttered. That is nitpicking.
- It won't be for everyone. The various body types, the looks of the women, it's very amateur and varied.
- With the wrong person, the navigation could be very annoying.
Bottom Line:
This network features some sites I was a member of many years ago. It can be misleading. The network is listed as first being listed in 2013. The little hub page might have started in 2013 but one site I know I have been a member of before, T&A Amateurs is in this network and it was first listed in 2005. The sites look that old too.
I mentioned in the pros, the explanation about the video quality. They are remastering older videos but are not counting them as new updates. This might not be a big deal to some but they do lack video options. Most of the ones I have looked at have a 480p option and a 1080p option. I would like to see a 720p option in there. A few of the newest videos even have 4K.
This type of site can be difficult to review. One of the newest updates is of Tori Black. She's certainly not an amateur but the content does not look like it was filmed recently either. The last time I saw anything about Tori Black she was talking about her boobs growing. In this video, she has hardly no boobs. They could have filmed this 10 years ago and just now released it. I also noticed Aaliyah Love listed as a "mature". There's a little fudging on "amateur" status but overall, the models are probably 90% amateur.
This is the similar style of shooting the ATK sites uses. Sometimes I prefer this especially with established models. It's very bare bones, little makeup and it has a real feeling to it more than the studio porn sites give.
The amount of content is very high. There are over 6,000 videos and over 4,500 photo sets. As I go through the content for the review, I am still seeing some "pros". I just noticed Jelena Jensen and Kagney Linn Karter. The content still comes off as amateur.
The selling point of this site (besides the price) is the amount of content combined with the vast majority of it being of models you've never seen or heard of while also having models you know but you will see them differently here. It's like a pro model just moved in next door to you and she's just a normal, down to earth woman.
If you wanted to complain about anything it would be the separation onto category based "sites". One is "Fuck the Geek". There is really nothing to show these particular models as "geeks". They look just like the models on T&A Amateurs. Maybe that is a sign of an amateur site. There isn't much production value in these scenes. They do have one site called "Chickpass Pornstars", so that is most likely where the random known models are coming from.
The navigation plays a big part in all this. You do have a hub which shows all recent updates no matter what site the update is from. The top of the page has "network sites" so you can go directly to the site you're most interested in. There is a "video" tab and a "photos" tab. It's hard to find that much fault in a system that is this simple.
They also have separate sites for race like T&A Asians, T&A Latinas and so on. They have a few they have created like XXX NJ for what they have tagged as "Jersey Girls".
I have got to the point I usually don't look at "bonus" content since it is usually streaming only and/or very low quality but they have 6 bonus sites that are very similar to their regular sites with similar content. Not for sure why these are called bonus sites but they are worth looking into too.
There is no way I would have thought this network would score that high but they have a very high amount of exclusive content and it is very high technical quality. The 480p videos even look good with 3000+ bitrate. It's one of those sites that feels like they decided to stop pouring money into making it look good and instead focused on getting good content.
Though I did mention it in cons, I will add here the models should be the deciding factor for most. They have over 1,600 models. You will find plenty of them that only have 1-3 scenes. I have seen at least one with 250+ scenes. The good part of this is also the bad part, the ones I have liked the most only have 1-3 scenes and are ones I have never heard of.
There is male/female sex, blowjobs, lesbian, strap on, threesomes and even messy for those that are into the messy porn scenes.
It's hard to take much off this site.
Amount of content, quality of content, amount of models, two updates per day, covers most niches, plenty of amateur models, some pro models, navigation is simple and straightforward, all with the one flaw being the outdated site design. I'm looking over that for the positives.
Segpay is the biller, not the best biller to deal with but I didn't have any problems with them. There was a tricky pre-checked cross-sale that I almost fell for. It told what I was joining "Chickpass network for $9.95" and had to click it. Just below it was a pre-checked box for GFLeaks.
Overall though, I am pleased with it. I would recommend it at the TBP/PU price to anyone interested in amateur porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A VR Cosplay site with some really great models on it.
- Supports 7 different VR devices
- Updates weekly
- High technical quality for a VR site.
- Very good job on costumes
- Download speed is just okay at 60% of my max download speed.
- Lots of potential but...
Cons:
- I expected stories, settings but most of what you're paying for here are models in costumes.
- I thought since regular porn sites have VR scenes, a VR site would have regular files for those watching on a PC/monitor/laptop, they do kind of but the content is hard to watch on a regular PC/laptop.
- The streaming player crashes if you watch 3 or more scenes without closing your browser. Requiring a ctl-alt-del to close your browser.
- I did have a PS4 VR headset which is supported and it did nothing but make me motion sick.
- No pictures to download
Bottom Line:
Maybe this is the point where porn fans become divided? I'm glad I got this site on a promo or I would have been more upset with it.
I downloaded multiple versions of the videos on this site.
There is a fisheye effect no matter which way the video plays. Using my PC/monitor the mouse's scroll wheel was allowing me to zoom in and out. Which is hit or miss since most of my zoom in scrolls were shooting me right by the action.
Years ago, a model named Eve Angel caused me to join many sites trying to collect every video she made. A model I think reminds me of Eve in current porn is Apolonia Lapiedra. She has a scene on this site and it was a factor in me joining. I can't even watch her scene. I've downloaded all 7 versions, over 30GB total for all 7 but all of the files split the videos in half and put the scene on the right 15 inches of my screen and the scene on the left 15 inches of my screen.
There are no pictures to download. You have Apolonia Lapiedra in a Pocahontas outfit but no pictures to download?
There are positives here especially if you're a gamer. Fallout, The Witcher, Bioshock, Red Dead Redemption, just to name a few, all have models dressed like characters from those games. The Fallout one to show what I mean about setting and stories. The model is wearing the typical vault outfit. She's wandering around where a picnic bench and chair is turned upside down. It looks like my back deck after a bad storm. She tells the man with the camera she needs water and food. He holds his hand out and does the money motion with his fingers. Sex starts. Those that don't know Fallout it is a game set in post-apocalypse United States, so flipped over picnic table doesn't exactly fit a major WWIII situation that started Fallout.
It seems like if you hire these models that really do a good job of looking like the characters you would spend more time making the scene a little more authentic. Here ... she runs up with her vault outfit tore half off and says a deathclaw attacked her and the male talent is a raider who then takes advantage of her in her scared state. It looked like a regular porn scene with a fan of Fallout showing up. I don't expect great acting or anything like that but I've been around people that are serious in cosplay. They follow a theme.
I know I'm scoring it low for the inability to watch it in a normal way but there is as big of a deduction for the poor production values and lack of pictures.
The potential I see is like with the Eva Berger scene playing Sansa from Game of Thrones. Honestly, I thought it was Melisandre the Red Woman but after I looked she can pass as a Sansa look-alike. I think my eyes were still messed up from trying to watch the scene.
There's a decent amount of content with nearly 130 scenes. I do think they gave up on coming up with parody names. One of the first ones is one of the best names, Grand Theft Swallow. Some of the content is based on much older series like the Betty and Veronica scene. I had to look that up to see it is from Archie comics.
I tried watching two scenes on my nephew's PS4 VR headset and couldn't make it 3 minutes before I felt nauseated. In my defense, I have poor vision in one of my eyes. It gets worse in peripheral vision. I just don't think having to use a VR headset will ever appeal to me.
Maybe this will help others that have seen VR sites they have considering joining.
These are the video types:
Vive/Oculus 5K (newer videos have 5K)
Vive/Oculus
Oculus Go
Playstation VR
Samsung Gear VR
Daydream View
Mobile HQ
Mobile LQ
I thought those Mobile versions would be "regular" versions but they're not. To show the file sizes, those listed above range from 1.8GB to 8.3GB.
They even have Daphne and Velma from Scooby Doo and it looks really good. The costumes, the colors, the women look believably like the characters.
The main thing you are going to see in these videos is a very POV-style of porn. The scenes have Binaural Sound and all that means to me is, you're going to hear obnoxious models screaming "Ohhhhh yes!" very loudly.
This seems like such a good niche. Their Tomb Raider model looks near perfect. But it really is unwatchable for me. I remember when maybe it was Give Me Pink that had the weird fisheye camera and you couldn't watch it without feeling motion sick.
Even if I say it has major potential, it still has no pictures and hardly no stories or proper settings for the characters. It looks like I talked my girlfriend into being a video game character for a night. I do wonder if it is that it will appeal to younger porn fans that are just into the very look of the model. There we go, I've been looking for that word, it feels very shallow. I give it a 70 for the models and costumes. That's it. I don't like anything else about this site. Oh and it has some bonus content that is not VR. I came for cosplay not regular porn.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A newer (very small) site from the Team Skeet group but it does not come with a Team Skeet membership.
- Unique twist on Asian porn, has an authentic wacky Asian porn side to it.
- Vina Sky scenes, there's the next big "little" model. Very reminiscent of Veronica Rodriguez, except Asian.
- Video and picture technical quality is very high but no 4K.
- Excellent production values, it seems when Team Skeet launches these individual sites they do so with much more creative content.
- Very easy to navigate thanks to the small amount of content. Even beyond that, this looks like a "new" site and not because of the amount of content. The layout is clean and everything is explained.
- Download speeds are very good (80% or more of max download speed).
- Epoch is the biller. Also has Paypal option but I can't get Paypal to work with a Visa card.
Cons:
- It wouldn't be a Team Skeet site if the first page you see after joining didn't include 90% ads.
- You won't believe this, well, maybe you will. When you click home after joining "Little Asians" it takes you to the Team Skeet home where you have no access to anything except Little Asians. I like the people at Team Skeet but Little Asians doesn't even try to be a different site. It tells me to unlock Team Skeet Premium to get everything.
- Here is the number ... 13 total scenes in 4 months and only 3 updates so far this month (April 2019).
- Most likely will end up on the Team Skeet network in a few months like Black Valley Girls did.
Bottom Line:
There's really no way to write a very long review on this site. I will start it off with a big compliment, it's the first time in a long time that I downloaded 100% of the scenes from a site. It only has 13 scenes but the percentage is still 100%.
This is one of those sites that lives up to its name. The models are all Asians and they are little. I like the quirkiness of the scenes. The Kawaii Kitties scene has both female models starting out acting like cats, complete with little costumes. They break something, both crawl up the steps and hide in the closet until the man comes in and goes looking for the "bad kitties". One scene has the guy ordering a Hajakuru doll. It arrives, it's a "real" Hajakuru doll. Somehow, the model/doll never makes a noise in the whole scene and never shows an emotion.
There is a definite weirdness or quirkiness to this content.
That and the technical quality is what saves this site. Oh and Vina Sky. One of the smallest pornstars I have ever seen at 5' 83 pounds with 32AA boobs. She has the same energy and charisma as Veronica Rodriguez when she first started. And she has 2 scenes on here.
Since the site is newer (January 2019), it is hard to punish them too much for amount of content but it is worth noting there were 6 scenes in January, 2 in February, 2 in March and 3 in April. There is no update schedule and at their current pace they will have maybe 40 scenes in their first year.
They have photos and screencaps with downloads as well. The videos go up to 1080p and have 360p, 480p, 576p, 720p as well. On the videos these are extremely high quality and because there are stories or themes to the movies they are longer than typical porn. The file sizes on the 1080p go as high as 4GB each. Even the 720p go over 2GB.
All but one scene are male/female or male/female/female. There is one lesbian scene.
The biggest complaint you're going to find here is that this is not a true standalone site. The members area is at members (dot) teamskeet (dot com) (slash) littleasians. And that clicking "home" page sending me to Team Skeet instead of Little Asians is just a little annoying.
I am tempted to click to unlock the premium membership which opens up all their sites but I really don't want to risk the potential cost. They have upwards of 15 sites they are selling as individual sites plus the Team Skeet network that has over 20 sites on it. I'll mention this here, several months ago, I joined what I thought was Black Valley Girls but it was instead a membership to Team Skeet which didn't include Black Valley Girls. They now include Black Valley Girls in the Team Skeet membership.
I really believe they have potential. Their site Family Strokes is another of those with excellent production values and creativity. This Little Asians site is very good. It's just not very realistic to expect people to join all of the sites, especially with so many of them only including 1 site membership. I don't know how feasible it would be to release all their sites in one network but it would sure interest me if they did it.
If you like Asian models and like the quirkiness of Asian porn, this is a good site but if you're like me, you can download the whole site in less than an hour. That is really my only complaint. The ads aren't even a problem once you get beyond that first splash screen when you join.
I might be being a little nice with the score but the only place I see a need for improvement is in the quantity. Those into Japanese pop culture will probably laugh a little at the little jingle/tune at the beginning of each movie. It sounds like it is straight out of the old video game Space Channel 5.
Recommended for those that like little and/or Asian models but keep a hold on your expectations in the quantity department.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Harriet Sugarcookie, one of the cutest, most playful and most believable Asian amateur models.
- She has a British accent and she's Asian!
- Mostly amateur content and you will believe that.
- Harriet or someone's personality shows on the site. They have blogs, news, video games, not safe for work sections, a magazine layout of their favorite recent articles and so on. It looks like everything but a porn site.
- Right at 50 models including Harriet, only a handful of pros like Aletta Ocean and Tiffany Doll.
- It's going in pros but 342 total scenes made me wonder.
- Bills through Epoch or Paypal, your choice
Cons:
- Every review I have read of this site talks about the downloadable videos. Those are gone. I paid $5 more than the regular price thinking it was for the downloadable versions but it's not.
- Every review talks about the photo sets. There are no photo sets anymore.
- The only option is to stream in a clunky 720p player that has to buffer every 30 seconds even though I'm on a 1GB connection.
- The December 2017 review on TBP lists 337+ scenes, there are 342 as of 4/20/2019, that's recycling.
- Used to have 2 updates per week, now it has 2 updates per month and it's recycled content.
- While the blog and magazine has some interesting articles you could find most of those with basic google searches.
- I wasted $20. Notice the amount I paid is different than the two prices TBP lists, so something strange is going on with Sugarcookie. I joined through TBP too.
- The hardcore scenes are not very good.
Bottom Line:
Harriet Sugarcookie is one of those rare combinations of sexy but geeky. I would guess Harriet Sugarcookie is not her real name but then again I don't remember the last time I heard an Asian person talking with a British accent.
I thought I had found the porn world's best kept secret when I found this site. I could be wrong on the "mostly" amateur models. I only recognize a few and I was wrong when I thought I had found one of the porn world's best kept secrets.
What you get here is a site that looks like anything other than a porn site. I had to go through a whole process just to figure out how to join it. The tabs include "Magazine", "News", "Trending", "More" and "Porn". Magazine is a collection of articles like "The 10 Sexiest Girls on Game of Thrones" and the news is articles like, "Where to buy sex shop clothes that aren't trashy". The articles are mostly interesting if for no other reason, something different to read and think about. These are authored by the same person and they update every few days.
Oh yeah, I joined a porn site. I was feeling good about the numbers considering it's an amateur site.
There are 214 hardcore videos
64 solo videos
64 lesbian videos
That is 342 total videos. The 2017 TBP review and facts update lists 337+. It also was updating 2 times a week in 2017. Which means there should be at least 500 videos by now. I understand that these solo sites can be hit or miss and the models and owners of the sites often have disagreements but someone is still updating the site like it is updating. There are 2 new updates in April 2019 and 9 in 2019. That tells me there is some recycling.
Rabbit's Review site shows member's area pages where there was a download button below each video and social media bar, now the download button is gone and there's a second social media bar.
This is type of site I normally wouldn't even review but because I was being curious again and found nothing but 2017 reviews talking about how good this site is, I thought I should review it and warn others.
All the reviews I've seen also talk about 100+ photo sets. I haven't found 1 photo set. The closest I've found to photo sets are in the magazine "girls" section and each entry focuses on an Instagram girl. I don't see those as sets since they are random pictures.
The really bad part is Harriet is a great amateur model. The streaming videos show very realistic sex which means the hardcore is as boring as watching your neighbors have sex but the solo and girl/girl content is very good. You definitely won't feel like the girl/girl content is scripted. It's very playful and cutesy to start and then they get downright dirty.
I'm guessing I'm late to the party. The oldest content is 2014, so it is not a newer site.
You can see by some of the titles that the content would be interesting to most porn fans:
Harriet's first ever anal toys
Harriet's first ever dual penetration with toys
Harriet's first time getting off with the showerhead.
Harriet's first on camera blowjob.
It's the very type of content solo fans look for. Everything is kind of screwed up from the recycling, so I really can't tell what is newer and what is older other than Harriet's own changes in how she looks.
It also takes away from whatever the blogs and news added since I don't know if those are just recycled too.
The most confusing part, I joined through TBP and it shows a $15 streaming price and a 2nd price at $25. I have to think that's the download version price and it's what I joined except they only charged me $20.
Hopefully, others will see my review before spending their money on it. That streaming player is the worst I've seen and there are comments on nearly every video that are complaining about it. It buffers about every 20-30 seconds.
They do have a porn deals section with reviews of the sites they are offering discounts on and nearly half are rated lower than 4 out of 5 stars.
My thinking is Harriet is the writer and she is using her real name. She talks about in the Babes Network review how she wishes she could model for Babes.
Breaking down the negatives comes up with a bad problem.
-20 no downloads
-20 no photos, or downloads of photos
-20 for recycling
-20 for the streaming video player being terrible
-20 for whatever the hell happened to the price
-17 for 5 updates since 2017
For a total of -17
I'm going to give it a cute and playful +69 for the Harriet content for a final score of 52.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of mostly teen sites.
- By my count there are 33 sites included.
- Pretty good update schedule, certainly could be better considering the number of sites. They average 3 updates per 4 days, across the network.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max).
- Nice, clean network hub which is something I think I took points off for in 2011.
- No cluttering ads, there are 3 at the bottom of the pages.
- Mostly really cute and pretty models but there's not a big variety from model to model.
- Excellent navigation and even says 24/7 support.
- Because of the nature of the content (teens, younger, slimmer) you won't see a lot of implants.
- Some of my favorite models on the network have double digit amounts of content.
- It does a good job of covering the majority of porn niches.
- Very good technical quality throughout from video quality to photo quality.
Cons:
- It's always a good thing when I have to nitpick cons. Several of their sites are very similar and could be merged like Nubile Girls HD and 18 First Sex and Beauty Angels and Teen Sex Mania and X-Angels. If they merged everything there would be 10-12 sites instead of 33.
- The "categories" don't always work. Which is why they should merge sites into one.
Bottom Line:
I once gave this site a lower than average score. I hadn't developed a taste for the humor of reading poor subtitles while watching porn. I remember the site being clunky back in 2011.
The good news is the corny subtitles are still there and now they're quite funny and they've turned the site into a streamlined, well-oiled machine, kind of.
You can tell most of the models (male and female) are not that experienced in porn. I watched a scene where the guy was so focused on the model's boobs he didn't notice her take her panties off and he reaches for them about 7 times before he realizes they are on the floor. It's like the first time I met a woman wearing a front snap bra!
I'm not as excited about the content. It's good and the models are very attractive if you like slim models. I do like what they've done with the site. It's like when I figured out what a front snap bra is!
There's a need for a little laugh at the dialogue from the subtitles. I just picked a random scene for this.
The female is a cute, probably 19 year old and she's sitting at a table in her house. She calls her I assume boyfriend. The dialogue is:
Her: Hello? It is me. Where are you? At work? I see. I'm waiting for you at home. I miss you. Ok. Please come faster. I'm waiting.
27 seconds pass and the guy walks in! Was he working on the front porch? Slide a "20 minutes later..." in there. He comes in and she tells him she will give him a massage. He lays face down, she straddles his butt and takes her shirt off!
Okay, okay, I'm giving them a hard time. Before she ever really massages him she's completely nude. Throw me a curveball ever once in awhile, have the guy say, "What the hell? I thought I was getting a massage? Why are you naked?"
I didn't list it in the cons but it is probably the most legitimate con of the site. If you don't like the corniness you might have a problem with the corniness.
Combining the sites that are similar wouldn't hurt but it wouldn't make a big positive either. The better navigation has fixed most of the old problems.
Their navigation is so good, I'm going to trust their numbers they list.
They have 1,383 models, 5,085 videos, almost 900,000 photos and they are all downloadable.
That's 9 of 33 sites still updating. The problem with this is the 9 that are updating also there's 4-5 others that fit into this group, could be used to put new updates in. First BGG and Tricky Masseur have a theme with them, the others are the same type of sites. Some of those listed as updating only have 2 updates in 2019 and this is the 4th month. Likewise, those 4-5 others might have a new update next month but haven't had one over the last month or two.
I wished the whole "network" gimmick would just go away. It's a website with about 20 niches/themes and each one is being called a different site(s).
Having said that, for barely legal looking teens they have you covered.
Let me throw this in, if you like 4K videos they have a lot here. Going back into 2016 even and they have VR scenes on the TMWVRnet site. I don't use either of those but they're there. The 1080p scenes are available from 2013 forward.
The photos they have are upwards of 3500 long end and for the ones into the VR and other video formats, they have some videos at 60 frames per second, Binaural sound, 3D and 180 degrees. If you're a VR person you will know more about those than I do.
I have to compare it on some level to a site like Nubiles Porn or even some of the 21 Sextury content and it compares well. If you're looking for something that is different and not too formulaic, this isn't going to be the best site for you.
It's one of those sites where you really can't find much wrong with it unless you don't like the content that well. I've obviously found some humor in the scenes and I do like the high technical quality but it's still lacking some personality and it still feels like the models are too similar. At least for my tastes.
I would even wonder how much of this content falls into the heartcore genre and that usually doesn't go over well with me.
I'm not going to punish the site for that. They've done everything they need to do with the quality, the pretty models, the multiple high quality video options and the much improved navigation and site design. This is a higher score than I gave it the two previous times. I believe I gave an 80 and then an 84, so an 88 is credit to their improvements. The content will be more up to your tastes. I could see it being polarizing.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An Amateur Asian porn site. That is relatively rare these days.
- Over 500 models (see cons).
- I like their sites Trike Patrol and Tuk-Tuk Patrol. Those also feature John Tron who is on ASD as well.
- Some of the Asian models are very attractive.
- Kind of updates "daily", an example of kind of, the March 30th update is a 30 second video of John Tron talking and standing in an airport terminal, I guess. The screenshot that I clicked on showed a very pretty Asian woman in tight jean shorts but she's not in the video.
Cons:
Cons will be explained in the bottom line:
- The navigation is very bad. You have three search options: alphabetical, country and date of release.
- The value is very low. $40 for no downloads, not even the photos.
- The photo quality is 1600 long end at best. That was barely acceptable in 2007.
- The blogs, the master guides, have not updated since 2015.
- Non-Asian models. It's an Amateur Asian site! I can see American and European amateurs all over the internet.
- The price. It's the only website on the internet that is $40 with no downloads.
- The ads. Seriously? 12 ads in the right margin and 3 are moving? For a $40 a month website?
- The Flight Club, a rewards system, definitely see Bottom Line.
- The camerawork in doggystyle.
- Some of John's own comments to members make you wonder how "unique" he is.
- Their own sites Trike Patrol and Tuk-Tuk Patrol have nearly as much "sex" content with downloads and are cheaper.
- A lot of cleaning up needs to be done on the site.
Bottom Line:
I considered saving this for my 350th review. I have both welcome emails to verify I am a full, paying member on the site. Seemed too easy to just jump in and pummel the site. The truth is I wanted to like this site. I once read something by John Tron about his frustration with Americanized women and I could relate. I have read other things by him about his love of Asian women.
I expected this site to have problems with me. The no downloads is a problem since I am a collector but would someone really try to sell a site for $40 a month, no downloads and not deliver with a very unique experience? I took that risk. They set the precedent with the price and no downloads.
The content reminds me a little of Amateur Allure. It's formulaic. Some of the models are really pretty. There is an indifferent part for me but could be a positive or negative to others. Most scenes end in a creampie. I'm indifferent to both the creampie and facial. I do want to note before the creampie, some of the videos skip a little. Looks to be edited. It isn't my connection. I'm on gig internet.
The streaming videos look good if you go full-screen. If you don't go full-screen you will have at least one moving ad and five more ads beside the video player. There are also 6 moving ads below the video player.
I watched several of the non-sex videos, a few funny moments, but nothing special. The photos look like they could be good until you click one and see it's lost in 2007. They are 1200 to 1600 long end depending on the orientation of the photo. You also can't download the photos.
In a comparison, I watched 2 of their "sample" videos on free porn hub, a tube site, they allow the content to be there. I only had to see 2 ads beside the video player on free porn hub. The videos are shorter (9-12 minutes) on porn hub but it's because they edited out most of the bouncy camera parts.
Each doggystyle section is similar to mounting a camera on a mountain bike and riding it down the mountain. They also use a fixed camera for doggystyle. This gives you the unique experience of only seeing the woman's side boob, side butt and John's side gut.
The blogs haven't updated since 2015. The product reviews by John haven't updated but once in the last year and one of the newest reviews is an external hard drive. Something you won't need on this site.
One of John's replies to a member that asked if he was going to bring the model back ... "asking every day. Her husband seems to be the problem". The site's tagline is, "Conquering Asia: One slanted pussy at a time."
Member reviews have long been based on "value" meaning price/what you keep from the site. That is $40/0. Look at that, I found the unique part about the site! It's the only site on the internet charging $40 for what is equal to a glorified tube site, except it has more ads than a tube site.
I started the review saying the site set the precedent. It is what happens when you insist on playing by different rules than other competitors. I'm not talking about mainstream porn, either. I'm talking about Trike Patrol and Tuk-Tuk Patrol. They have downloads and are $10 cheaper.
I believe ASD jacked their price up to get people like me to think "they must be doing something really special on this site to charge $40 for no downloads." I would have been much happier with a month of Trike Patrol.
I'll end with the Flight Club. They reward you points for things like being a member (+100), for logging in (+10) which pays them for all those ad views, commenting (+10) probably reloads the ads. You can "buy" scenes for 600 to 2000 points. Oh and for writing "informative articles" about Hot Asians and Porn (+400). I'm wondering if I get those points for my review? I noticed at least one "member" (the 99) review here has the same review all over the internet. A note on the price, the 2013 TBP reviews said the price was $29.95. How many sites have increased their price from 2013 to 2019? Upon canceling, Vendo offered me a "please stay" discount of $19.95 a month.
I used the same scale I have used for 12 years and on 349 reviews to write this review. I rarely list all deductions or additions since there usually aren't this many. I will not argue or debate with their webmaster but he is welcome to comment. Here are the additions and subtractions.
-20 for no video downloads.
-20 for the price shifting/overall value.
-10 for the non-Asian models.
-10 for poor photo quality and no photo downloads.
-10 for the ads, the not updated blogs.
-10 for a rewards system that awards members for shilling the site and clears their points as soon as they cancel, even if they still have membership left.
That's 100-80 = 20
+35 for the pretty amateur Asian models and the non-doggystyle believable sex.
+3 because I don't like odd numbers.
Of note: I have taken -20 for poor photos and no photo downloads before. I knew I couldn't add enough points to make up enough to get it to 50 points.
100-80+38 = 58.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site of pornstars Mark Wood and Francesca Le ... but wait it's also a network that is a network in the Evil Angel network.
- If you like hardcore porn this is the place for you.
- Massive collection of porn.
- There are 25 websites in the network including possibly the most disgusting website ever created, Milk Enema.
- Very high quality technically and in production values. You would think people this perverted wouldn't care about production values but they do.
- Download speeds are the fastest I have had, it's about 90% of my max.
- Some legendary producers are here including Buttman John Stagliano.
- Navigation is pretty good once you figure out what you're doing.
Cons:
- Enough with the confusing crap. It says Evil Angel Network once I signed in, so is this just an Evil Angel clone? It also does not come with Adult Time and this is a Gamma Entertainment site. Look at it this way: LeWood is a 24-25 website network and it is on the Evil Angel Network which I had never heard of and through my Evil Angel account, I have access to Adult Time. Do one network. Not three. Not two. One.
- There is some very hardcore content on here. I am not against it but it should be mentioned in cons.
Bottom Line:
I can't seem to get out of this cycle of Gamma sites. This is one time I think having the ability to post a picture or screenshot would help with this review. My tab at the top of the screen says, "Evil Angel Network" not LeWood. In another tab, I have Evil Angel open.
This is where I am going to get frustrated. As an Evil Angel Member, I can search in "directors" for LeWood. Here are a couple names of the most recent LeWood scenes on Evil Angel:
Emily Willis: The Anal Awakening scene 4, scene 3, scene 2 and scene 1.
On LeWood's website the most recent scenes are:
Emily Willis: The Anal Awakening scene 3, 2 and 1. There are also 5 other LeWood scenes in-between those. So, part of the newest content on LeWood could be gotten from Evil Angel. Even worse, Evil Angel already has parts 1-4 of Emily Willis: The Anal Awakening while LeWood, the director of the scenes only has 1-3 on their website.
To me, that hurts both LeWood and Evil Angel. Evil Angel's biggest selling point for years was the exclusivity of their content. There's no way I can sit here and go through each of the LeWood sites and see just how many them are near clones of content on Evil Angel.
It kind of feels like LeWood is a spinoff of Evil Angel at a higher price. Even more odd that I have Adult Time access with Evil Angel but not with LeWood.
The good thing is I am a fan of a lot of Evil Angel content. I like their quality, the depth of their content and their production values.
By my count there are around 8,000 scenes. The content dates all the way back to 2000.
The videos started with 1080p around 2009 and every video since has up to 1080p quality with 6 lower options. They cover the quality very well. They also have a pictures category and I honestly can't tell you what the photos are related to.
As example, the video update on 3-14-2019 is of those devilish Ortega twins and on 3-15-2019, the late bloomer Vicki Chase. The 3-14-2019 photo set is of Luana Navarro, a transsexual model. It says it's from Luana Navarro Set 2. These seem to be legit photo sets and not screencaps but it doesn't match the video releases. All of the videos have a "related pictures" link that is usually to 6-10 photos. These specific "photo sets" have over 200 photos in them and are downloadable.
It makes you wonder if these sites have a tester that goes through the site as a member to see how the experience is.
A big selling point here is my girlfriend likes transsexuals but she only likes solo transsexuals. One of the transsexual sites on this network is called She Plays with Her Cock. I was showing my girlfriend the site and every scene is a transsexual with a man. Why would you name a site "she plays with her cock" and then have the model having hardcore sex? It would be like a site being named "She plays with her pussy" then you open it and she's having sex in every scene.
Confusion seems to be the theme here. It's definitely not bad. It could use some changes. The site works very good just like every Gamma site does.
If you're curious about Milk Enema, they squirt milk into the model's ass and she squirts it back out into other people's mouths. Don't take that as me being nasty. Take it as me saying I'm telling you what is so the curiosity won't lead you to watch a scene! Tori Black, one of my all-time favorite models, has a scene on it and her scene isn't that bad. Some of them are very graphic. It is an older site that hasn't updated but maybe 3 times in the last 4 years but you've been warned.
Most hardcore doesn't bother me at all. I grew up watching Buttman scenes. Those old Buttman DVDs are still very good, similar to an old Vivid DVD.
My main complaint is how much of this content is already on Evil Angel? I probably won't join again because I believe the majority of what I would want is on Evil Angel. I don't mean to say that as a way to hurt their business. I just don't like joining two sites that have the same content on them.
There is nothing in the members area to make me think LeWood is a separate website or network. The url for LeWood's homepage is members (dot) evilangelnetwork (dotcom) en (slash) videos (slash) lewood. It's a subdomain of Evil Angel Network.
These sites are getting carried away with all this need for networks and confusing prices. Of note, Evil Angel, Adult Time and LeWood all go up to $29.95 in the second month.
Definitely not my most coherent review but the content I'm reviewing isn't very clear. I'm giving it an 86 because it's good, hardcore porn, in very high quality.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the frontrunners for the best new(er) networks challenging the big name networks like Reality Kings and Brazzers.
- 43 sites by my current 3/11/2019 count with a placard in place for "Dirty Cosplay" coming soon.
- Already has a large number of scenes with nearly 3,000.
- Updates every other day, usually would expect more from a network but their production values are very high for a network.
- There is a good balance of niches.
- This is an odd one but it can viewed in 6 languages.
- They even have photo sets and zips, though you will miss them if not paying attention.
- Download speed is 80% of max, I have seen it drop a few times but not for more than 20-30 minutes.
- You're sure to learn a new language or two.
Cons:
- The update schedule is okay for a high production value network but there are a lot of sites that are not updating.
- Website can be serious pain in the ass to deal with, will explain in BL.
- Navigation and layout could be streamlined. I sometimes feel like I'm qualifying for the mouse-clicking contest.
- Biller is Segpay, if you're new to them they are not bad but can be frustrating.
Bottom Line:
The first time I joined this network it was barely a network. I didn't even know it was called the PornDoe network back then. Some of their kinkier sites had got my attention. Now, they are the Let's Doe It network. I would call it "Worldwide Doeing It Festival". You can even add "of Arts" at the end of that.
The biggest con for me is the site itself. I forgot my password. I tried to reset it, I had to answer a captcha to even start recovering my password, then a captcha to submit my email address to recover. Once the change password link was sent to me, I clicked the link in it and had to answer another captcha, I typed in a new password and you guessed it, had to enter another captcha.
I missed 4 separate times! The real frustration then showed up. After changing my password and being sent to a login screen, I logged in, the "busy" spinning symbol showed up on the screen and a message flashed "Cannot connect to captcha" and I couldn't sign in. I was this close to posting my first ever 50 review. Porn sites are so quick to get you through the sign-up registration process because they know that is when they are going to get you to miss unchecking a cross-sale but once you're a member they make you jump through hoops for 20 minutes just to get signed in.
I took 10 points off for that. It's better than 50 points off.
The content here isn't that much different than the content you will find on Reality Kings, Brazzers, Bang Bros but there is just enough difference to make it a good network to join a time or two per year. The problem I am already running into is a lot of the sites that interested me to begin with are no longer updating. Their navigation does not help in figuring out which sites are updating and which aren't.
If this is wrong blame the navigation. By my scanning through newest updates these are the only sites that have updated this since February 1st, 2019: Horny Hostel, Her Limit, Scam Angels, A Girl Knows and The White Boxxx.
That is 5 of 43 sites updating. There also are scenes missing from some of the sites. Chicas Locos and Public Bondage were the two sites I originally knew of from this network two years ago. About half of the Public Bondage scenes are gone and Chicas Locas is missing a few scenes too.
Those that have been members of Bang Bros, Brazzers, know the frustration with the ever-changing sites within the networks. I don't know if they decide a certain type of scene is no longer working or if they're trying to predict what the next big thing in porn will be but it definitely hurts the returning member possibility.
One thing I have noticed are the sites that are updating are almost all United States/Canadian. They have content that is German, Latina, Italian, French, Portuguese and US/Canada. One German site is still updating, the other 4 are US/Canada. It's true, the US and Canada have a blend of all those types of models but this goes back to the navigation. Why have all those listed when only two are updating?
That's probably my way of saying it needs to be less cluttered.
The models include very well-known pornstars but there are lesser-known models here too. I don't know if that will continue if they are focusing on US and Canadian models. My favorite model on the site hasn't changed, Apolonia Lapiedra. I do not think she is a well-known model.
The model list is usable but the two options they give you to filter the models with are "Hotness factor" and "Recent activity".
If everything was easier to use, if the navigation and clutter were cleaned up, this network would be up there with the very best networks on the internet. As it is, it's a good alternative for when you get bored with the top networks.
The quality is good throughout the network. They do not have dates on their older content so I don't know how old some of this content is but everything I have downloaded from here has up to 1080p video and every scene I have looked at has downloadable photo sets.
The sites that are no longer updating are still good sites for new members. It kind of feels like they probably recorded a lot of content before launching as a network. Once they were launched they decided not to record more of the same niche content and just stuck them on here to add some varied content. It's better than nothing. Bang Bros did it for years with success.
I will wrap up with the con about Segpay. I have never had any problems with Segpay but it is because I realized you can sign in on the Segpay site and cancel your membership(s). Most sites with Segpay have a support option and want you to submit a ticket. If you go to Segpay's website you can enter your card number and email, it will let you cancel from there plus it will send you a cancellation confirmation email.
The needed improvements might be too much to ask but the content is still very good.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A network that is going to be very hard to review as a whole, massive network of young, teen, hairy, shaven and some just beautiful models.
- You get access to ATK Galleria, Premium, Exotics, Natural and Hairy, Petites and Archive. If you like them all you better set aside some time.
- I try to join sites through PU's links but I had a promo for ATK Network for $49. That's my max that I would pay for a site/network.
- This will be explained further, I am counting 10+ updates per day across the network.
- Download speeds are very good (between 80-90% of max)
- Navigation is not terrible, if you have been an ATK member before it will make the navigation better for you.
- ATK's photos are the focus for me. Their videos are okay to good but the photos are better.
- They have most mainstream niches covered on the network.
- Signup through CCBill
- Could be a lot better with some fixes. Even 15 or more points better!
Cons:
- I don't mean to offend anyone that likes hairy models but that hairy site is a waste for me.
- No access to Aunt Judy's or ATK Girlfriends. Maybe Aunt Judy's is understandable but why no ATK Girlfriends?
- Patience is a good thing. Time is too. You're going to need both to bounce back and forth between websites.
- The regular price $99.95 is way too much, $49.95 is better but I don't know that I will join again at that promo price either. I would say $34.95.
Bottom Line:
Maybe the most frustrating review I have posted ever. There's no way I was going to join ATK's network for $79 or $99. I had a promo they sent me about 6 months ago for $49. Since I hadn't joined Exotics, Premium, Petites or Galleria in nearly a year, I decided it would be worth joining the network to catch up on the content I've missed.
I considered Archives to be a site I wouldn't need to check since I have a lot of the older ATK content. I knew I wouldn't be downloading anything from Natural & Hairy. The first thing you will notice about the network is it's not a network. You are buying a membership to the six sites. You have to sign in on each. ATK is a massive site/network. Some of these sites have been around for as long as I've been buying internet porn.
I decided to look for a specific Eve Angel scene from ATK Premium. I first opened the "movies" tab. It shows Premium only having movies back to 2014. The Eve scene I was looking for was probably 2009. I clicked on the models list and there's Eve (Eva on here). There are 16 pages of her content. No dates. Two videos, two photosets per page. That's a lot of clicking. I bounced around from site to site having to sign in on each. I thought I would check Archives out, it says the current content in the archive is from 2001-2006. Then it shows newest updates in the Archive as 2019.
Stop it. This is not funny. This is a regularly priced $99 per month network!
I can fix it. Put all the content on one site. Call it Amateur Teen Kingdom! If you find a model you like, this is what you will have to do to find all of her content:
Find her on Galleria, download her content, login to Petites, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Archives, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Exotics, find her in the model list, download her content, login to Premium,find her in the model list, download her content. Yes, I know that's repetitive and redundant but when you do that for 10 models, you start to feel repetitive and redundant.
Put it all on one site and go with a $34.95 price. This reminds me very much of when the "All Only" network launched years ago with 5-6 premium sites in it for $34.95.
The content is good but trying to dig through 6 sites in 30 days? I would rather join one and have 30 days to go through it.
I don't think I realized that until halfway through my membership. I have downloaded all the Exotics content that I wanted/has been added since my last membership. I will be lucky to finish another site before the membership expires.
The ATK sites offer something rather unique these days. It's a professionally filmed amateur site. No, they're not all amateurs but when you see the models you will think it's from their amateur days. There's little to no glam here. Makeup is at a minimum. Premium, to the best of my knowledge, is the only site that offers "no implants". These sets will make your most favorite glamorous porn star look like the cute girl that just moved in next door to you. It's a major selling point. Their photos are much better than their videos. Premium has some good videos but overall, the ATK photos stand out.
The amount of updates is impressive. I'm just estimating at 10+ per day, across the network. Exotics alone has 3 to 4 updates per day as does Petites. And I get the part about Archives "updating" as they add old content but where is that old content? Is it being removed from the regular sites? If so, it shouldn't be an "update".
The video resolution on the newer scenes goes up to 4K. Photos are very good quality and downloadable.
I looked around for content from Fred the Photographer but don't see any new content filmed by him. He was always one of my favorites.
This is another thought about improving not just the ATK sites but any site that specializes in photos. Has there ever been a thought about combining all of a model's photosets into 1 zip? There are models on here with dozens of photosets at 10 - 50 MB. It takes 1 second to download those sets.
The frustration comes from knowing I would have been happier and it wouldn't have cost much more to join each site on a monthly membership. As it looks right now, I might get two of the sites caught up on my downloading. Those sites could have been joined for $17.95 each.
My preferred order of the ATK sites: Petites, Exotics, Premium, Galleria, Archive, Natural and Hairy.
Still don't get why Girlfriends isn't included as this is the ATK network and it's an ATK site. Seems like a missed opportunity to get ATK fans hooked on another site.
My score is leaving major room for improvement. Petites and Exotics could easily score 90 on their own. Maybe I will review one of those as a standalone and show how my frustration goes away when away from the six site package.
I would recommend any of the ATK sites if you're into the niche they cover. I just can't recommend this high-priced package of sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's largest sites and highest quality sites.
- No longer is just about teasing or non-pink or non-sexual poses, the site continues to become a little more risky each time I join and it's a very welcome change.
- Not only will you find at least a dozen or more models you really like, you most-likely won't see half of them thanks to size of the site.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- The models are all very attractive, very much teens and they're becoming more playful.
- The quality is close to as second to none as you can get, that's technical quality.
- The pictures can be so big that they're bigger than life-size. I opened one and all I could see was the model's belly button and a couple freckles. That's virtual reality to me.
- For a site this size the navigation is very good.
- The videos are nice technical quality and some are good, not great but the real draw here are the pictures.
Cons:
- So, about those videos, it's not meant as disrespect at all or even demeaning to the models but most of these models are so young that they're just not seductive in the videos. It reminds me of watching a woman do naked yoga. Some might like that but some won't.
- Similar to the other sites on Met-Art's network, there are cam girls over on the right of your screen.
- This is a new one that I hadn't seen before, "staff selection" videos. Looks interesting, started playing one ... it's a 30 second sample. If I want it ... pay $4 for 1 video. I don't like it. I know, I can skip it but when you're posting videos of non-masturbation then post one of masturbation and tell me I have to pay to watch/download it, I don't like it.
Bottom Line:
I've been trying to review sites that aren't reviewed as much but my subscription to Met-Art is running out in a few days and I wanted to review it.
For years, Met-Art frustrated me. I like pictures as much as videos. They're taking really good steps to improving the photo sets. More models are starting sets in clothes and teasing, that's a big improvement to me since used to it was "she's naked" in picture 1 and by the end of the set she's still naked and not showing anything. Now, you're going to see most everything including the fun teases, upskirts, upshorts, panties slid over. I'm glad to see them adding more sexuality to their site. I used to kind of "poke at them" for their models doing the "what is over on that hill over yonder" poses. Now, they're doing, "I'm bending over, what do you see?"
I listed in the cons and I really don't like the "staff selections" videos that feature masturbation, which very few if any of the regular membership videos show. At that asking price, two videos would cost almost as much as I pay for a monthly membership to Met-Art. I've been borderline on complained about Met-Art X having masturbation while Met-Art doesn't but I think Met-Art at this point has earned the right to stick to no masturbation videos on Met-Art ... which is why I don't like the staff selection videos. It makes me feel like they could just combine Met-Art and Met-Art X if they're going to charge extra for masturbation.
Met-Art's strength has always been photo sets so I didn't really punish them in the score for the video problems.
You get 4 new photo sets per day, which is more than anyone that I know of. And they have a very good variety of settings. I know someone asked recently on another review of another site about photo orientation. Met-Art has a good blend of both portrait and landscape orientation in their photos. The overall numbers would normally be more than I would try to include in a review but I'm going to try it in this one.
Here goes nothing...
18,886 photo sets
812 videos
And yes, those numbers could be wrong! I would say even if they're not exact, they're fairly close. Just estimating, that's around 1,500,000 and 2,000,000 photos. When you add in that high technical quality, it's all but impossible to complain about Met-Art.
I'm going back to the beginning because I have been very impressed with their style of shooting in the newer photo sets. We've got upskirts, upshorts and the lost art of skin-tight shirt with nipples sticking out. I don't want to say they've been influenced by anyone but a lot of these newer sets are very similar to the sets on Zishy, which to me is the best tease photography site on the internet.
The navigation features updates tab, films, photos, model list, blog and they all work! It let's you focus more on what your preference is and with a site this big that's a must. Maybe even ALS Scan has influenced them a little on the photos, I just thought about that and threw that in.
They also are adding a better blend of models, they're almost all slim/slender but a few are more built and you're starting to see more Hispanic, Asian models. That to me is where Met-Art is at their best. You're capturing very young models, so the teasing and hints at shyness is important to it. This also plays into the large photos. If it's an upskirt and you open one of the large photos, you can see everything you've ever wanted to see through the models' panties. The combination of adding more tease and big photos offsets the video problem for me.
You of course can download the photo sets in zips and some of them are as big as some videos you've downloaded. These newer photo sets are nearing 8000 long end. We have joked before about the huge pictures sometimes showing imperfections but in this case, with all this teasing, I don't mind being able to count the pubic hairs she missed while shaving.
Similar to Zishy, I just can't go all the way to a 100 with Met-Art because porn is photos and videos. I will say that if they improved their videos it wouldn't really change how I view Met-Art, as a photo site. So, maybe it's best that they don't try to become a solo masturbation video site. I don't even know that I would download the videos. I have a Met-Art folder that has over 300GB in it and it's all photos. It's going to be a long time before anyone threatens their dominance of the photo porn world.
I would recommend it to anyone but I like to think everyone likes some photos. If you're dead-set on videos, I can't say you'll be happy with these videos. I do want to mention someone asked a few months ago about sites that have videos of fully nude models lightly touching themselves but not full masturbation. Met-Art fits that description well.
Like some of my other recent, highly-rated, well-known sites, I probably won't review Met-Art again unless there's major changes. It's near perfect as it is.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Call it Met-Art goes to the produce section, or Met-Art with working anatomy or Met-Art gets the finger, it's Met-Art solo, maybe the X is misleading to some.
- Met-Art models masturbating, that alone is 2-3 pros.
- The same Met-Art quality we've come to expect, numbers will be in the bottom line.
- Very good download speeds, just over 80% of my max download speed.
- Navigation is good, easy to use and from what I can tell is accurate.
- Photos, as expected, are still a strong focus even with the masturbation videos and are downloadable.
- Something I haven't said too much in recent reviews, it's not likely you'll find a model that's unattractive.
Cons:
- It's hard to list cons on Met-Art because they are always trying, always improving something, but the sign-up page nearly got me on a cross-sale because the programming was off and had it crumpled up in the middle of my screen (right where you type your username in registration). Remove the cross-sale and that can't be a problem.
- Ads from cam models, I think they're free for Met-Art members but I'm afraid the majority of us have been tricked way too many times by those on OTHER sites, not Met-Art ones and got charged for clicking on them. Either way, everything would look cleaner without them or with them at the bottom of the pages.
Bottom Line:
For years, I've joined Met-Art and thought, "All it needs is a little more personality." Then, they brought out Sex Art and I thought, "Okay, not that much personality! Those new personalities have dicks." Then, I joined Met-Art X and said, "This is what I've been looking for!" I don't like to say any model or models are too pretty or too innocent for hardcore sex but it's how Sex Art makes me feel at times. No offense is meant, nor am I dropping a competitor's name for any other reason than to say the Sex Art content reminds me a lot of Nubiles.net's content which my review of it shows I complained about the models not looking comfortable in hardcore sets.
But Met-Art X is more personal, I've always joked about the solo genre needing to be a collection of short stories, like a girl and her finger, a girl and her 11 inch cucumber. It's to my surprise, better than I expected but it's hard for this type of site to be perfect. As one of the biggest solo fans on PU, even I eventually get bored with solo porn. I do think in the case of Met-Art X it's more about the models becoming comfortable with masturbating for the camera. I've said it before, I can watch 1-2 minutes of a solo video and tell you if I'm going to like it. The model's body language, her expressions and her sounds, words, moans.
I've never found a model that mastered the solo scene like Eve Angel did, especially later in her career but there are some here that have a lot of potential.
For sake of giving credit where it's due, one model on here has me looking for more, Elena Koshka. Her scene "Indulge" is one of the most erotic masturbation scenes I've seen and her eye contact with the camera is ... Eve Angel-level. One of the most genuine aspects you see with these younger models is when their eye-contact breaks from the camera, not because they're shy but because they hit the right spot and close their eyes.
There are others but I think hers stand out as my current favorites on the site.
The site isn't huge like Met-Art but it's growing. There is one update per day and it alternates from video to photo set each day, for a month you'll get around 15 videos, 15 photo sets.
The video quality does vary but only on the 4K option. I don't know if there's a pattern but the videos with 4K option aren't that common, maybe 2 per month. I tried making the jump to 4K back on Black Friday but ended up returning the monitor/television and going back to 1080p, so the 4K isn't a selling point for me either way. All of the videos have 1080p option, as well as 720p, 360p and 270p options. The videos are crisp and clear with excellent sound, something they've taken from their sister site Sex Art.
The photo sets are some of the best you will find and they also do something I'm partial to, some of the sets even start with the model fully clothed. The photos are downloadable in high, medium and low qualities. The newest high quality photos are 4200 long end and there is a mixture of portrait and landscape photos in each set. The photo sets are also a good size in amount of photos with most having 100+ photos in them.
As of 2/3/2019: There are 211 models. There are 631 videos and 438 photo sets. See how nice good navigation is? I didn't have to estimate on any of those.
For me, this is a near perfect site just because even when I get bored with solo porn, I always come back to it. There's also a nice blend of model types, though I would like to see a few more "exotic" looking models. The blend is in body types. You're not going to find any models here that fit in a 40 inch ass category or huge boobs category but some of the models are definitely curvier than others, which isn't real common on the artsier sites. The curvier ones look like they were or are athletic young women with fit builds, instead of slender.
The masturbation isn't ever too extreme or even rough, a lot of it looks like genuine 1-2 fingers masturbation. There are some fruits and vegetables and toys in some scenes but I prefer the finger ones.
The numbers also tell us that most of the models have more than one video or one photo set. I'm going to have to join Met-Art (been awhile) to see how many of these models have sets on it that are tamer and that in and of itself, will make these Met-Art X scenes even better to me.
There's not much to change. I would have every scene start with the clothed model but there are exceptions. One of my favorite photo sets on the site is Barbara Vie "Just Like 90s" with her slinky top and panties on in the shower. So, she's not fully dressed but the clothes make it even better even if they're only on for 5-6 photos.
It's a site I like a lot and probably would score it even higher but this was my very first join of it. I have to give it some room to move up and continue to impress me. Recommended for those that like or love solo models.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very good site that includes access to two other sites, doing my best not to call it a network.
- This is one of those sites that the models are the big selling point, very attractive, cute, pretty ... mostly thin and young looking models.
- The price was even cheaper than the TBP price shows, it was $19.95 when I signed up.
- Updates daily, is easy to navigate and would go as far as saying it's one of the best navigating sites.
- I'd almost add this my newest criteria for a site to have to be reviewed, it has photo sets and they're downloadable.
- Download speeds are above average, about 75% of my top speed but will mention this more in BL since it's possible I'm being capped by my cable company.
Cons:
- Considering how young most of the models look, you're sure to walk away feeling like a dirty old man/woman. Maybe that's a pro?
- Two pre-checked cross-sales.
- Not for sure I would want much story since I wouldn't be able to understand them but there's not much story.
Bottom Line:
I put off joining this site for several years. I didn't feel I was old enough to fully enjoy it, much like Teen Mega World. I guess that's me saying I'm now old enough to enjoy it.
The sites you receive are: Wow Girls, Wow Porn and All Fine Girls. Starting out with some numbers:
Over 600 models
Over 4,000 videos
Over 5,000 photo sets
The quality is very high here. Close to 700 of the videos are 4K. Their oldest videos are available in 720p, so there's very little low quality content.
The navigation stands out for being a little different than what most sites use. Since they have three sites, you can select to just look at content or from all 3 or 2. From there they have the basic tabs along the top that will take you directly to the videos, updates, galleries (photos), and model list.
They also have a tag system that seems to be fairly accurate. There are a few that make you wonder if you're looking at a porn site or a theater list like "Acoustic Intimacy". Either way, acoustic intimacy does not sound like porn.
They also have the videos that are shot in 60 frames per second.
Overall, the three sites give you a good blend of solo, lesbian, hardcore, threesomes and foursomes. Not to anyone's surprise, my favorite scenes are the solo ones. These models are a little different than your normal solo models since they can't communicate with their words and if they do, you can't understand them.
The sex can be hit or miss and I also think that's common with a site like this one. The guys almost always seem excited while the women do seem either shy or very horny. That's where the solo content stands out. Most of these women seem to love masturbating for the camera.
I should mention this before I forget it. My download speed estimation could be off a little. I was upgraded in internet speed again to Spectrum Gig. But the highest download speed I've seen was 450 Mbps, the Gig is supposed to be near 1000 Mbps. I've noticed it's not as high on other sites either so I'm most-likely being capped.
The models are some of the best I've seen, in the teen category. You even get scenes that are believable to the different models. Besides liking the solo ones, I also like the ones that are playful lesbian scenes. What man or woman even doesn't think about walking by the bedroom door and seeing two 18 year old young women kissing, fingering and well, just naked?
I think that should be added to this site's genre/niche, how about we call it, "For your voyeuristic pleasure"?
Which is why the pictures are such a big deal. The one thing I've always preferred with pictures is they let your imagination work. Sometimes when watching a video, I want to tell the model to stop moving around, pictures solves that problem unless you look at them too fast.
I have noticed they also play to the younger look of the models with some of the outfits like silky socks with a puff of lace at the top of them. I'll be okay with it as long as they don't bring out the lollipops and pigtails.
I should have mentioned that Vendo was the biller for me, they're trustworthy. The Paypal signup doesn't allow Visa cards.
I'm sure I could complain about some of the action being dull but maybe that's the point of the young models?
I would put these sites just a little below Nubiles but they're still one of the top 5 in pretty models, young model, type sites.
I would recommend it to anyone who hasn't been a member before or at least in a while.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A nice change of pace site that also gave me access to Adult Time.
- I like alternative women, tattoos, and there is a lot of both on here. Would be a con for some.
- You also get a broader range of body types on this site, which is a major plus for me.
- Ran by Gamma, fairly easy sign-up and cancel but both could be easier, see cons.
- There's a good blend of content, you'll see threesomes, MMF, group lesbian and should say most everything is hardcore. There's not a lot of softer content but there's also not any too extreme hardcore either.
- Most of the models are very attractive.
- I would like to list navigation as a pro but the Adult Time hub takes the site over and you have to work with Adult Time's still clunky navigation. That to me is a Pro-Con.
Cons:
- One pre-checked cross-sale and after unchecking it and submitting payment, the same exact offer popped up on my screen. I consider this borderline unethical because the pop-up lands in the middle of your screen and looks very much like the "enter site" screens you see on some sites. Not a huge deal but why would someone join another site when they're given Adult Time?
- I won't say the action is 100% formulaic but most of the scenes do have a similar feel. You kind of get the feeling the "different" style of models is the unique part of this site. And that's okay but should be noted.
- Adult Time might have a negative to it that I just noticed and will go into in the Bottom Line.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member at Burning Angel several times over the last few years. Not surprising to those that know me, I originally joined it to get some exclusive scenes of one of my all-time favorite models, Regan Reese. There are several regular models on here that I do collect too, so a join each year or every 6 months is normal.
The con about Adult Time: I joined Burning Angel for $15, then I see that I have Adult Time which would keep some paying members for more than a month. The price after the promo month is $30 a month. I normally wouldn't notice that but I've been trying to figure out how these sites are just "giving" us access to Adult Time without an extra charge. I also wouldn't have thought about it if not for the pop up mentioned in the cons. As soon as you give me reason to question ethics, I start noticing other things I normally wouldn't have noticed.
I personally like Adult Time but it complicates sites that I collect from. And I have one yearly membership that gives me access to Adult Time, already. I would wonder if they've considered giving you the option to turn off Adult Time access? Especially for those of us that have more than one membership that gives access to it. I'm starting to think about potential problems that I and at least one other PU member had with Met-Art's Network consolidating your logins to their various sites (I lost access for 3 days). I stand by something I said way back in 2007 on a review, porn sites should use the KISS system of Keep It Simple, Stupid. No offense is meant, my dad used to say it to me about everything.
Burning Angel, years ago, was one of those sites that mostly flew under the radar due to the alternative/tattoos look of their models but now that tattoos are more common, you'll see a lot of mainstream porn stars on here too. I'll add a bit of humor, at least for me, I don't think I realized some of these models had tattoos! I have had a huge attraction to Regan Reese, who was one of the first mainstream, heavily-tattooed models, for over 10 years. I've explained that also as having met Regan and would say I consider her a friend now. She was nothing like I expected her to be and to whatever extent, I think that opened my mind more towards the heavily-tattooed models.
The site itself has most everything you could want. The newest videos have up to 4K option, there are multiple video resolutions available from tiny (360p) to 1080p on the majority of the scenes on the site. Joanna Angel is credited as the mind behind the site and she's one of the models I collect from this site. They also have screencap downloads. There are over 400 models, it does include males so probably 300-350 females. There are 937 videos as of today (1/22/2019), according to the site's main page but I'm a little disappointed over the Adult Time access or what I would call "takeover" of the site.
If you accidentally click "videos", you're going to be taken back to the Adult Time videos. If you search in Adult Time for "Burning Angel" it doesn't come up. It's also not listed in the 140 sites section. Luckily, one of the newest updates on Adult Time is a Burning Angel video. I clicked it and was able to click the "Burning Angel" tag on it and get back to just Burning Angel content.
That to me is a major problem. I don't care if it's in Beta. I joined Burning Angel not a Beta of Adult Time. I appreciate Adult Time for what it is, a clunky, massive catalog of porn. I appreciate Burning Angel for what it is, a niche site that almost zero of the other Adult Time sites are like. Not having it in the sites list or being able to even find it in a search within Adult Time is poor business. I've said it before, I'm not a computer programmer but I know it can't be that hard to get all the sites listed within the hub.
So, my feeling is Burning Angel, for those that like alternative/tattooed models, is close to a solid 90 by itself. With Adult Time making me jump through hoops to get back to the Burning Angel content, it's a low to mid-80s site. I'm sure they will get this all fixed eventually and I'll have a more positive view of Adult Time. As of right now, it's burdening sites like Burning Angel. What I mean by that is, I joined for the niche of Burning Angel's models. Not in the mood for regular, mainstream models.
This problem can be best shown by my above part where I clicked on "videos" on Burning Angel's page and it took me to Adult Time's videos. I was able to search within Burning Angel's models but I'm sure there's a model tab somewhere on there that will send me to Adult Time's models and not just the Burning Angel ones.
I would almost say it's the best of tattooed/alternative models but I really don't know of many of other sites that focus on this niche. It's recommended and hopefully they'll do something to improve the integration with Adult Time. It makes me wonder how many other sites Adult Time gives access to but aren't listed.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- At one time, one of the best multi-model, solo girl sites and it's still good, just with some changes.
- Download speed is very good (80-85% my max).
- Probably as much variation as you will ever get in solo porn.
- Other Aziani sites come up as closed when you click the links from within the sites BUT the content is now mixed in with the Aziani site's content.
- A pro and smack on the butt for trying to be different in a copycat industry.
- CCBill is the biller, no cross-sales and no ads unless you count their trusted friends at the bottom of pages.
- Navigation still works very well, they have an excellent tagging system but I said very well and excellent, not perfect.
- My favorite part about Aziani: They get models that you don't see a lot of on other sites. As a Lana Lopez collector, I'm positive Aziani has more content of Lana (10 photo/video sets) than any other site and there are many more of these.
- Huge site (see bottom line).
Cons:
- As good as the navigation is, once they started combining sites onto one, it does make it a bit harder to find content and to know for sure you're seeing all of the model's content.
- Hard to believe but the oldest content on this site dates back to 2002. Updates have slowed to 5 in December, three of those came between December 1st and 25th, two came on the 26th. The older content is poorer quality and the newer content is becoming very slow to show up.
- Rachel Aziani most likely has retired, her last set was 7/4/14.
Bottom Line:
I want to initially focus on the pro about the smack on the butt for trying to be different in a copycat industry. To my knowledge, outside of Sybian-based sites, Aziani was the first to regularly let their models ride the Sybian. These sets, if you've watched them, can be very hit or miss since the Sybian itself obstructs the best views but some of these videos are excellent. If Lana Lopez ever had a negative against her it was that she wasn't always "into" her scenes. A very pretty model that could easily pass as Jessica Alba. Her selling point was just that ... her looks, not even nudity. Her Sybian scene on Aziani is the most expressive I've seen Lana and it shows what us porn users most-likely missed in her career.
They also were the first site I knew of that had specific public nudity, exhibitionism with their site Aziani Exposed, that content is here on Aziani now. They even tried fitness models and even female muscle models. They had a separate site for those called Aziani Iron, that content is now on Aziani. I'm pretty sure TBP still lists them as separate sites but I can confirm the content is on Aziani now. They've tried the massage theme. They originally had 6 bonus solo model sites too. Three of those, when using a link inside Aziani, say they are forbidden but the content from those solo sites is also on Aziani.
One of their biggest strengths for me was the loyalty between them and the models. Most of the models have 10+ photo sets/videos, some have as many as 50. To me, this all brings a slight laugh since the site originally was for Rachel's husband Buzz to photograph and video her masturbating. Her friends then showed up and it never seemed to stop or find a happy medium. That makes it both sad and great to me. Rachel's husband Buzz is another of those photographers that the models seem to love to shoot for.
I'll let some of the numbers speak for themselves:
Roughly 400 models on Aziani with most models having 10+ scenes.
Nearly 3,000 videos and photo sets, each.
Videos go up 1080p, have 720p options, older videos go down in the more standard video sizes.
I used to joke in my reviews of Aziani. Rachel herself had talked about Buzz having a lingerie fetish, which isn't the best thing for those of us that like to see a model fully-dressed. I'm pretty sure I once listed one of the cons, 10 years ago, as "Jealous of Buzz". Most of the sets do start in lingerie.
I do think it's a con that Rachel isn't shooting anymore. If her information online is right, she's 50. I thought she looked attractive in her 2014 sets, maybe not as comfortable as she used to look in her sets but didn't see anything wrong with her look.
Even with the clutter of combining all those sites into one, the navigation still works, especially if you know who you are looking for. The solo sites that originally came with this site are: Dakota Rae Patrick, Amber (Bach) at Home, Priya Anjail Rai, Heather Summers, Mary Carey and Lexxi Tyler. All of their content is now on Aziani.
I was surprised when I signed up and saw a new update from an "Aria". I thought it was going to be Aria Giovanni but it's not, however, this Aria is also very attractive. I think that could be a con for some. The majority of these models are not teens. They also are more aimed at bigger boobs, including implants. These were the types of models that were very popular from the late 90s into the mid-2000s.
And continuing to find the sites that at least have some interest and focus on real photo sets, not screencaps, Aziani's photo sets are real photo sets. There are a lot of positives here. You have Sybian, public exhibitionism, a little different with the muscle models. There's not a lot of male/female sex on here. I do remember Rachel Aziani, the site, having male/female but I haven't found many of those on Aziani. I don't remember those being anything great. I'm pretty sure Buzz preferred the solo models playing with themselves for him and his camera.
If interested, especially if you're a collector, check out the model list. Just doing a quick scan over it, I noticed Lexi Belle, who has 49 scenes on here. I'd also like to know more about this new Aria and if she has other content. She has 8 scenes on Aziani. It's a site that's worth trying for the collector side and finding new models or even forgotten models. I just saw one earlier, Cindy Hope, that used to be one of my favorite models. It's not going to go much higher than a 90 but I do think a 90 is fair considering the huge amount of exclusive content that covers multiple genres/niches.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I once questioned if this site was for me (2008 review of an 81), it's still around and it's now one of my favorites!
- One of the most unique porn sites on the internet.
- I could be wrong since some of these models could be on other sites but I don't know any of the models from anywhere except this site.
- They have a little of everything for everyone, as far as body types, pubic hair, and real amateur models.
- The site works well and loads quickly, important since I assume their servers are in Australia. DL speeds are very good (about 80% of my max).
- Despite the amateur genre, the content is very high quality.
- You won't ever feel like you're watching cookie-cutter porn on this site. Very unique scenes with what looks like real, believable sex.
- While you're not likely to find an Eve Angel here, I have found many favorites through the years and they all look like women I see in everyday life.
- Billing is handled by Epoch.
- No cross-sales
Cons:
- I will stress this one. In 2007 or 2008, whenever I reviewed this site originally, here at PU, I was neck deep in the Eastern European porn boom that seemed to churn out "perfect 10" models weekly. I questioned the quality of the models here at Girls Out West. And it's important to say, I still don't like every model and I would guess most porn users wouldn't like every model.
- This site has a true pro/con, that I'm listing as a con. It's addictive. The models are almost all new to you if you've never been a member and some are so cute or so pretty that you just have to check out their content. I've been a member for 3 months now after only meaning to join for 1 month.
Bottom Line:
It's worth mentioning that I've typed this out six times only to run out of characters before finishing and starting over. That hasn't happened since probably 2016. In short, Girls Out West, has been a fountain of youth for my porn interest. I once heavily criticized this site, 2008 or 2009, with an 81 review here at PU. Which is below average for my scoring. I didn't like that every model wasn't a perfect 10 and didn't like underarm hair on some of the models. I still don't like underarm hair but I just don't pay attention to it like I used to.
It was a different porn world back then. Eastern Europe ruled the porn world, perfect ten models, prissy, feminine models. They also had two of porn's greatest producers Denys DeFrancesco and Viv Thomas filming back then. In 2019, we have a bunch of models that are just like the last model and producers that think porn is 19 minutes and 56 seconds per scene with the same 5 positions highlighted, in order.
Girls Out West changes that. The main focuses of this site are solo models and lesbian scenes, there are male/female scenes but they're not that common in numbers compared to the other two:
Roughly 2,000 solo scenes, roughly 1,500 lesbian scenes, roughly 300-400 male/female scenes. Hopefully, you're adding that up to nearly 4,000 amateur scenes. They also have over 2,000 photo sets that are shot more in the style of Denys DeFrancesco (DDF) than current photographers. Including starting with a fully dressed model that giggles in some pictures, teases, then is fully nude.
There's personality here that you don't find in many sites these days. The more than 2 models, lesbian scenes have the feeling of, "What happened, she was naked and I got horny so I got naked and those two over there got horny and got naked then we all got together."
Besides the huge amount of exclusive content there's also the technical quality with some videos having 4K dating back a couple years, 1080p, 720p dating back more than a decade. That's rare for amateur sites.
I decided to try Girls Out West again when I saw a picture set, on a free TGP site, of a model named Rubi Valentine. She was cute, playful, sexy, exotic, natural. To my surprise, the watermark was Girls Out West. I joined in November 2018 and am still a member, another rarity for me to let a membership recur for 3 months. I can't help it. With that much back archive and daily updates, it seems like I'm just now seeing every model at least once and have downloaded over 100 models content from the site. That's another plus, the majority of the models have more than one video/photo set, some even have over 20. Besides my initial attraction to Rubi Valentine, once a member, I discovered Lulu. An incredibly cute model that has a "kind you don't take home to mother" side to her. Sorry for the Rick James reference. There's Bianca that could easily have been a top 3 model in the Eastern Euro boom of models.
There's also the frustration in myself for overlooking this site for over a decade. This is the closest I've seen to real, believable sex in porn in years. The Australian accents don't hurt, either. Neither does the kinky, frizzy hair that was made popular years ago. That, in and of itself, is exotic these days. Exotic to me is a look. It could be a darker complexion, it could be dark complexion with green eyes, it could be a hairstyle that's uncommon, an attitude or personality that's not phony (sorry Los Angeles) and Girls Out West does those types of models better than any site that I've joined over the last 5 years.
I won't give it a 100 simply because these models are not for everyone. Including me over a decade ago. I also haven't been a member long enough to say the site is a 100. That's probably my fault. I will say it's the first site I've felt constantly drawn to since joining, since the first time I joined Zishy. The blend of models, slim, heavier, darker complexion, pale complexion, freckles, it's all believable, real.
The amount of content: Close to 4,000 videos, 2,000+ photo sets, is unheard of in the amateur world unless it's one of those amateur sites that has a bunch of 18 second clips. There are interview videos that are fun to watch. The accents and personalities really shine in those. It takes me back to a time when porn was fun, models were shooting it for money but also because they loved having sex and losing inhibitions. There are exhibitionist, voyeuristic, scenes here too. I haven't noticed many implants or tattoos but considering these models come off as genuine, I'm not for sure those would bother most viewers.
It's rare that I let a site recur this long with intentions to go at least one more month. Besides the video quality that is hard to find in amateur porn, the newer photos are 6000x4000 resolution! It's even rarer that I feel bad about giving a 97. Give it a try, at least look at the previews. It has become one of my most recommended sites to others.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- ALS Angels, the bustier, lesser-known, sister of ALS Scan.
- I think it's a very underrated site that many probably don't know exists.
- If you like slick shaven models, this site is for you, ALS stands for All Ladies Shaved.
- These models look older, more physically mature than ALS Scan's models. Though there are exceptions.
- Continues to churn out 2-3 updates per week and the site dates back over 10 years.
- CCBill is the biller
- Download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Like ALS Scan, the videos are very high quality and on top of that, you get very big, great quality photo sets with each scene/set. These are photo sets not screencaps and can range from 300-500 photos.
- Has some unique scenes that bring a helper into a solo scene, some gynecological scenes, some fisting, a little bit of everything in the solo genre.
- Excellent models, a lot of these newer models are models I only know from ALS Angels.
- One of the few sites that I like the BTS videos from.
Cons:
- As each year passes, ALS Angels navigation and layout grows further away from 2010. Come on, guys, do something with the navigation.
- The standards for being on ALS Angels instead of ALS Scan is becoming very blurred. A very recent model is 5'3" 99 pounds with 32B boobs. How does she land on the curvier site? No offense to the model is meant, quite the opposite.
Bottom Line:
I can be a bit grouchy at times and this might be one of those times. I've been a loyal supporter of ALS since 2007, have joined ALS Scan more than a dozen times and the same for ALS Angels. Joining two sites to see all of the ALS models and content is frustrating. Here's an offer of a truce: Fix ALS Angels so it navigates better, make it look like it was updated this decade, and I won't be as grouchy about having to join two sites to see all of ALS models. This is becoming a rather abusive relationship at this point lol. I go on ALS Scan and it has this near perfect navigation, everything is organized, updates more often than ALS Angels then come to Angels and it looks like it's 2009 again.
This wouldn't bother me so much if ALS hadn't shown they can make changes or improvements. They have, even on ALS Angels, there's no nicer feature than they have on their scenes. You don't have to click anything to go to the set, then click a download button. The links are right there beside the set so you can just download them without going through all the clicks other sites make you go through. The same with their excellent photo sets.
I have complained in the past about the model separation. It used to be a bigger deal to me, back when Eve Angel was active and they insisted on Eve being on ALS Angels instead of ALS Scan. I bought the explanation of her having bigger boobs and curves in her hips but these newer models on ALS Angels are tiny. I mentioned 5'3" 99 pounds, 32B on one, there's another that's 5'6" 103 pounds, 32B. Another is 5' 105 with 32B. How do you get smaller than that? If I say much else, it's going to be very offensive and I'd rather not.
Done complaining.
I gave them a 100 and took off 15 for the complaints. These complaints have been here since 2009. Really done complaining.
ALS Angels offers as much or more as any solo models site. They perfected this "helper" niche, where a model/genuine helper, oils the model, is playful with the model, flirts with the model and depending on the helper, might even slip a lick in or a good rub or two. It's unique in solo model porn. It never seems planned, the helper is planned to be there but the actions seem very natural. An example I've probably used before is an older Eve Angel scene. The helper seems completely blown-away with Eve's sexiness. She's oiling Eve's thighs, looks at the cameraman/staff and says, "Does she like girls?" Eve isn't a native English speaker but Eve says, "Yes!" The helper leans over and gives Eve a lick or two. The helper most-likely didn't ask for pay! You could see how excited she was to get to lick Eve. There's another where a helper is helping Eve start fisting herself then the helper just starts fisting Eve. And Eve in her rare English moment says, "You're so good at this". You see real chemistry, a spark and as far as I know ALS is the only site that does that type of scene.
There are the ALS fetishes, from speculums, gynecological inspections, 12 clothespins opening the woman up, there's some anal play, there are fists, helpers' fists, fingers and despite all the variation of the solo genre, they do it in a way that the woman looks like she's loving all of it.
Their picture sets are up there with the best in the industry. Besides having big resolutions, zip downloads, their models are dressed very normally, you will sometimes see a bikini that might not look like something someone would wear for anything but a porn shoot but for the most part, they dress like I would expect them to dress in everyday life. Their makeup looks nice but it's never overdone.
I mentioned in the pros that I even like their behind the scenes videos. This is because some have the helper in them and you'll get the cute, playful moments where the model grabs the helper's head like she's forcing her to give her oral and you'll get the laughing moments between the model and helper. I'm thinking those type of scenes bring in a little exhibitionism for the viewer since the helper is often dressed fully. Some voyeurism, especially in the BTS videos, kind of like you're a fly on the wall getting to see how the model and helper act towards each other when not recording the masturbation scene.
The navigation problems (this isn't complaining) include the "main" tab taking you to 8 newest updates with two buttons after those to take you to "photos" and "videos". Both of those are one long page of updates. The model list is your best bet unless it's a newer model, then just click on their newest set and it will take you to all their sets.
I would call it a true collector site because the content is exclusive and unique. You're not likely going to find similar sets as you find here or bigger, better photo sets, the photo sets are photos not screencaps and range from 250-500 photos in each. I will recommend it to anyone who can look over the complaints, as the content is excellent for anyone who likes any kind of porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, in 2018, one of the top 3 porn sites on the internet.
- Tiered memberships let you pick your level of quality and what all you can download.
- A fair but limited "cheap" option of $9.95, will go over the options in BL.
- If you're on this site it's for the models. Few if any sites regularly, consistently come up with so many high level models.
- Picture sets here are some of the best you'll find, including the production qualities with settings, clothing, even the colors.
- Updates every 3 days, each update includes videos, pictures and streaming "mini-vids".
- Download speeds are very high for me (90% and up of my max).
- A big site considering it's mostly solo models.
- CCBill is the biller.
- I join once a year for 1-2 months and download the content that has been released since my last join. I download and keep every set.
Cons:
- The tiered membership options won't be a favorite of some. Be sure to read in the BL to avoid a mistake I made last year.
- The older content had more of the gyno-style of porn but the newer isn't as bad, though it's still "In the Crack".
Bottom Line:
When I first started reviewing porn sites, I had standards, criteria but that was 12 years ago. I'm older now and probably dumber! What I do know though, every year around the American holidays, I join In the Crack. I do that because I'm always off some of December and it let's me download more than in other months. I won't call this the best site but I will say it's one of the top 2-3.
Porn, like so many other things, has tried to adapt to the consumers wants. Not In the Crack. They are still shooting the same porn they shot in 2001. It's 90% or more solo. The models look better here than on any site. The settings on this site are better than any other site. And every scene starts with the model fully dressed in appropriate clothes. Their makeup is near perfect and natural looking. The lighting is even top-notch. The only thing I could complain about with the content is it can be gynecological. But tell me, if you were told you were going to be a beautiful models gynecologist would you or I really complain?
One of my favorite parts is ITC is generally very selective of their models. And the ones that do good have multiple sets. An example of a model that they have multiple sets of who I think is fairly popular in mainstream porn, Gina Valentina, I've looked her content up on other sites but never downloaded and kept it. Her sets on ITC are some of the best on the site. I've always mentioned sites that make the models happy and how they seem to get better performances from the models. ITC does that.
The tiered memberships can be confusing, they have 6 tiers. I'll try to separate them:
Basic, Streaming and Standard all have major restrictions. The first two have no downloads of photos or videos. Standard has no photo downloads but does offer 360p and 720p video downloads.
Plus, 4K and Ultimate offer downloads of everything with Plus being my choice ($34.95), 4K just gives 4K videos on top of the Plus options. Ultimate ($69.95) brings in the next limits. It's completely unlimited. Standard, Plus and 4K have DL Limits (hourly, daily, monthly). Years ago, that was a major no-no but I have no problem staying within the limits. I download the 720p versions of the videos, most files average 450MB. I could easily run through 10GB (Hourly limit on Plus) in 15 minutes but because I am only downloading the last year's content, I only need to average about 4 sets/models per day, about 6GB. If I had never been a member and wanted to get all the content, I would pay for the Ultimate.
This content is unique because it's solo porn that starts out with the models looking very pretty, feminine even, lady-like and ends with them shoving their fist in themselves or a huge dildo. They cover everything in-between from teasing in their clothes (upskirts, bending over) to light touching and masturbation to the more "hardcore" masturbation. They're not in a rush like most 2018 porn seems to be.
It kind of makes me feel old as I start to tell about having to walk through 12 inches of snow to get to watch nicely-paced, erotic porn.
Not only are they the best at what they do but I'm not even for sure they have much competition these days. I wouldn't compare them to FTV since this is a little more personal than FTV. It's you and the model.
Navigation is as easy as possible. Coming up with a content count is a little harder. They've been releasing roughly 10 scenes per month since 2008. Before then they released usually 1 set per month and that goes back to 2001. It's well-over 1,200 scenes.
It's worth mentioning that I did not take points off for the split videos. They, like FTV, shoot each video with an action in it, then they split the video for the next action. It does allow you to download your favorite parts that way. I really don't know if I would prefer full videos but I'm okay with the split videos now.
I kept looking for 1 point to take off and found it while working on the review. The site logs me off about every 20 minutes. How is that for nitpicking?
This is very much a premium site. I know to some it's not premium, some will even hate it because they want hardcore or they want something ITC doesn't do but for me, a person who is rarely that happy with porn sites in 2018, it's perfect because it does what it says. It does it better than anyone else does. It reminds me of when you buy a music album and you don't have to skip one or two songs. For me, they get everything right. Except logging me off every 20 minutes.
In a few weeks, I'll have all of the 2018 content downloaded from ITC and this speaks to how much I like their content, I'll still be stopping by their site monthly to see who the new models are. I don't get that with other sites. I used to but now there's only 3-4 sites that get my attention throughout the year and ITC is one. I was due a 99 and honestly can only think of one other site that I would score this high.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A no longer updating site in the Fantasy Massage network, that I personally think it the best site in the network even without updates.
- This massage niche was very popular for a few years then kind of dropped off. For me, the best ones didn't try to be that different from scene to scene and this one excels at that.
- Surprising overall quality considering it launched in 2008 and stopped updating in 2014, every video has up to 1080p quality downloads.
- Maybe the most realistic "fantasy" site possible since you would typically be nude or mostly nude.
- Very good DL speeds (80% and up of my max)
- Good navigation and despite the fact that it stopped updating in 2014, there's a fairly large catalog of content here (will go into in BL).
- One of the few niches that doesn't require acting ability!
- Photos with each scene that are screenshots.
Cons:
- This niche as much as any, has the "it's going to become repetitive" factor.
- As mentioned, it no longer updates.
- The scenes that try to do too much. Will go into in BL.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed another site from the Fantasy Massage network a few weeks ago and talked about how I thought this niche was very underrated but also poorly produced. A lot of massage scenes these days are just plain hardcore scenes that happen to look like a massage led into the sex.
Massage Parlor is the typical porn site of 2018. For me, it did way more right than wrong and it's one of the sites the network stopped updating. There's a part of me that believes these sites that stop updating, stop updating because they require more money to film, more time to plan, etc...
What stands out here is the vast majority of these scenes start out with the female masseuse talking to the male. The first 4-7 minutes is a believable massage, some of the masseuses start becoming aroused and grind their bodies into the man being massaged, they perform the massages in either robes that drape open or in sexy lingerie. It then progresses to either a handjob or a blowjob, usually further progressing into a 69 and the scenes last right at 20 minutes each.
That's believable to me. The massage scenes that turn into full sex, loud screaming and moaning, don't come off as believable. I would hate to think the main reason this site stopped updating was because it doesn't have much full sex on it but it does seem like that would also be believable. A couple of the other sites in the network also follow a similar beginning as Massage Parlor but go directly into full sex. I see massages as erotic, teasing and if done right, even mysterious. The temptation of going a little further than touching/massage is a realistic progression.
The good part is if you like this content there are 314 scenes on it and as mentioned in the pros, all 314 have up to 1080p downloadable versions.
You can see where they've tried alternate setups. They have some that have a masseuse in training, with the experienced masseuse playing something of a dominating role and forcing the trainee to give the male a blowjob. They have ones that the setting looks more like a hotel room than a massage parlor and a few that turn into multiple guys getting massages and blowjobs from the one masseuse.
I mentioned that acting isn't required in this niche and I believe that. The only thing required of the female masseuse is for her to give erotic rubs of her hand onto the man. This believably turns the masseuses on. Eye movements, eye contact, expressions, even breathing patterns work in that situation.
It's similar to my interest in handjob and CFNM porn. I like to see natural reactions from the females more than relying on their acting ability to make me believe they're enjoying themselves.
One of my favorite parts of this site are the models. One in particular, Chloe Amour, seems to love doing this kind of porn. She reminds me of Jessica Alba in some sort of odd way and she has 17 videos on this network.
Which is why I'm comfortable saying this style of porn is different than hardcore. Some of the models on here are extremely good at this style but are dull, dime-a-dozen, in regular porn.
This is one of those rare cases where I rate a site higher than its network. I've tried explaining that before and think I've figured it out. It's my way of saying, I would join this site whether it had the network access or not. I do think in this age of networks ruling porn, there are sites on those networks that stand out whether with our personal preferences or favorite niches. I've mostly heard negative comments from webmasters that say, "How can you score a site a X but only score the network that the site is IN a Y?" There, I explained it! The network itself is very good overall but I think the content on Massage Parlor shows that the network's other sites are very formulaic and are trying to meet some kind of criteria.
This network and site also gives me access to Adult Time but I am not figuring Adult Time into this review. This is solely on Massage Parlor. In my opinion, it's the best of the female gives male a massage niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another of the newer sites that to me fall into a "Premium" category.
- I joined 2 months ago on a $14 for 2 months promo. It comes with the site Pretty Dirty and this review will cover both sites. Of note: As has been mentioned about Adult Time, this site now offers me Adult Time access.
- 318 scenes between Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty, all have up to 1080p and 4 lesser resolution download options.
- It's the type of hardcore I prefer since it requires me to imagine a little before the sex starts.
- Overall, good acting in the scenes I've watched, I don't know if I just like Abella Danger so much that I think she's a great actress or if she really is. Several others do a good job too.
- DL speeds are very good (80% and up of max)
- Photo sets available but they are screenshots and can be downloaded.
- Mostly well-known pornstars but at least here you do see more from them than their best scream in piledriver.
Cons:
- This doesn't make much sense to me but the sites feel cluttered. Maybe it's the colors they use?
- For every good actress in porn, there's a dozen male "actors" that are only good at acting at acting.
- Not for sure why they have Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty as different sites. Both sites have similar storylines.
Bottom Line:
It's kind of funny that I was just talking last week about not having any access to Adult Time, I then got access to it with the Fantasy Massage network and now I have access to it with the Pure Taboo/Pretty Dirty network. I'm not including that access in this review since I have no idea how long they will continue giving access to it.
I joined Pure Taboo back when they had the 2 months for $14 deal and didn't even know I had access to Pretty Dirty until the second week of my membership. Taboo is such a broad word when it comes to porn. I actually remember one of the first porn videos I ever saw being either Taboo 1 or Taboo 2 that was supposed to be a real brother and sister having sex. I was a teenager and just have vague memories of it. The taboos on this site are fairly common these days, going into the stepfamily niche and some that don't even use the word "step" in front of daughter or sister.
My interest in taboo is pretty simple. As long as I am convinced it's something that's not supposed to be happening, it's good enough for me. It's like when I admit to having a rebellious side and people in 2018 ask how I was rebellious, I shaved my head bald in high school. They roll their eyes. Then, I became a psychologist who refused to suggest prescriptions ... that always makes the jaws drop. Anyway, you're going to need your imagination with these scenes.
There's a decent amount of content between Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty with 318 scenes as of December 3, 2018. Pretty Dirty no longer updates unless I'm doing something wrong. The newest update on it says 1 year ago. Pure Taboo updates twice a week.
I do think this content is rather unique because they almost go overboard with the stories. How many sites have this on a scene ... "WARNING: What you are about to watch is arguably the most shocking and graphic family roleplay scene we have ever filmed. We hope you find it equally arousing and disturbing!"
A recent Pure Taboo scene has Kendra Spade playing the stepdaughter role. She comes home to find her stepfather mad and fussing at her. She's fidgeting, he's blocking her from getting by while he continues to fuss and she pisses on herself in her tight jeans. I'm mostly indifferent to pissing scenes but this one is very sexy. They then work in the corny dialogue as the stepdad tells her to take her jeans off, you know, "so you don't track the pee through the house". She takes them off, he tells her that her panties are really soaked too. She starts to take them off and says, "Isn't this inappropriate?" He chuckles a little, "Yeah, if I was you real dad it would be." I can appreciate the laughs in porn but there's a fine line.
I should add that some of Pretty Dirty's scenes go more into "forced" scenes but you don't ever get the feeling it's non-consensual. Much like I said in the previous paragraph, I think this kind of porn also has a fine-line.
I believe the names of their scenes do as much to build a perception of the scenes as the actual scenes do. One of the newer ones is "The bad uncle returns" which I do think has more implication with it than the scene shows. The stories are mostly well thought out, acting overall is okay, so many of the female models seem to have spent the majority of their "acting" lives as sweet, innocent and go overboard with it. Kind of like the old pigtails and lollipops scenes.
And that leads to one problem with this type of porn. I would imagine that those who prefer the straight to action style will do a lot of fast-forwarding. Most of the scenes on Pure Taboo range from 30-55 minutes and a few didn't have much action until 15+ minutes had passed. That fine line shows up again. While it's easy to complain about scenes that jump right into sex, it's also easy to complain that "that's too much acting". I don't think I've ever opened a porn video and thought, "I'm going to kick back and watch 20 minutes of actors trying to convince me they're related!"
Overall though, Pure Taboo and Pretty Dirty are a very good combination that's worth checking out at least once. If you can get the two months for one price, I think it becomes the cheapest of these premium, story-based, porn sites.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The older, more mature, less innocent, side of FTV.
- The site has grown quite a bit and it has weekly updates.
- Much like FTV Girls, FTV MILFs focuses on mostly solo models, lots of outdoors teasing, public flashing, extended masturbation scenes.
- The majority of these models are not models that I know of. They very much remind me of amateurs that have decided they want to have some fun.
- Everything on the site is very high quality, it first opened in 2015, so all sets have 1080p videos and the photography FTV is known for.
- For the last 3-4 years, FTV MILFs and FTV Girls have been my favorite sites.
- Extras/bonus section is one of my favorite parts. You get a little bit of everything in it and it's all FTV MILFs content. From some extra store flashing videos to models filming themselves masturbate to taking showers. It stands out to me since it is FTV content instead of some licensed content from another site.
- DL speeds are very good for me (80% and up of my max).
Cons:
- I think some might question "MILFs" but they do a good job of covering the 28-50 year old range of models, there's just not as many of the upper 40s.
- The videos are split into parts, I've gotten used to it and even might prefer it now but I know it bothers some.
- If you're into FTV for the innocence, you're not going to get much of that here.
Bottom Line:
FTV MILFs was probably my most-anticipated site. I've been joining FTV Girls since 2006 and it's one of my favorite sites but my favorite models are mid to late 20s to early to mid 40s and this site delivers maybe the best selection of mostly amateur models in that age range.
I complained for years about the split videos. The newest one has 9 parts to it but as my tastes and interests change, I've found the more narrowed down clips that focus on one or two major actions (teasing, nude in public, masturbation, extreme masturbation) has let me pick the parts I'm most interested in instead of downloading what would be a huge file. Besides having 1080p option on all videos, most of the newer content also has 4K option. That newest set has 84 minutes of video, at 1080p, that would be a large file, at 4K with 12,000 bitrate it would be massive. The split videos allow you to watch your preferred parts without having to fast forward.
To me, FTV MILFs excels because it removes the innocence of FTV Girls. A lot of these models look like regular women. You just get the feeling that when the record button is pushed, they let go of any inhibitions and nearly all give top-notch performances. You can even see an almost "joy/release" on their face when they start flashing in public.
Here's some numbers since this site is still relatively new:
- Roughly 180 models, give or take a couple.
- Each model has video that ranges from 50-90 minutes total, split into parts.
- Each model has 200-400 pictures in as many as 5 different outfits.
- Around 30 bonus scenes and/or photo sets.
The navigation of the site works as good as you'll find. There's a model list that uses icons to tell you what actions are in each set, you can filter the models by date of their scenes release, age, bra size, height. There's also a lettered search to search by the first letter of their name. There's a "girl/girl" tab, too. If you favor the scenes with public nudity, you click on the icon "Nu!" and your results will have all of the scenes with public nudity.
For me, they're getting into the area of doing everything right. At one time, I used to think they should update more but the amount of content in one scene is much more than you get in most 2-3 updates on other sites. It's possible that me opening up more to the split videos has shown me just how much time and effort is put into the scenes since say split video #5 will have the model in a completely new location with a new outfit on and she'll be doing something completely different than in split video #4.
The models ages range from 24 (one of those), 26 (one of those), 27 - 49. The MILFs category has always been one that we've joked about since an 18 year old model could be a MILF in real life. And I think anything above 50 would start going into another category.
There are some hardcore scenes on this site too. I don't really like those as well but they're not that common. And they seemed to have stopped in 2017. At least based on the HC icon search. I might be in the minority on this one but there are so many hardcore sites these days that I'm completely fine with FTV sticking to mostly solo with a few girl/girl scenes thrown in.
I ran out of room in the pros. The biller is CCBill and this might not seem like much but they've (FTV) updated their login screen. Used to, it was the box that popped up in the middle of your screen. A very annoying box that stopped you from clicking on your join email to see your username/password. You would have to submit a wrong login to get it to lower the login box. Now, it's just a blank page with username/password and it saves to your browser.
I don't know how much this shows my interest and constant enjoyment of FTV but I've had a membership to FTV Girls for nearly 5 straight years and a membership to FTV MILFs for a little over a year straight. Those one updates per week, for me, have been better than what a lot of sites release in a month. I had to reserve a separate external hard drive just for FTV content.
One thing of note, the newest update is shot in Portugal which is very different for FTV as they usually shoot on the west coast of the United States but I'm guessing it might go into some legal nonsense with the United States' fear of nudity.
If you like MILFs showing very rare levels of confidence for porn, FTV's style of shooting, public flashing, some public masturbation, anything solo, high quality pictures that are some of the best in the industry, this site is a must join for at least one month. I used to join it when I renewed my FTV Girls membership as a cross-sale, seems like it was $7 for a week and it is full access, even try it that way. It's some of the best content I've ever seen and the only thing stopping it from being higher scored is the amount of content which could be higher, if I'm nitpicking.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A relatively large site in the Fantasy Massage network. Focuses mostly on M/F but there are F/F and up to threesomes.
- Some well-known models and others that might be more mainstream than I realize but all are attractive.
- DL speeds are very good (80% of my max and above).
- Oldest content dates back to 2009 and the videos all have 1080p options, picture set with each scene and can be downloaded in zip files.
- I'm guessing it's one of the oldest massage sites. It updates weekly and has 529 scenes as of 11/13/2018.
- Very good mixture of models, it seems at one time they were going for Asian models but there are other races.
- Any site that's been around since say around 2010, has a high collector potential since a lot of these models have stopped modeling. They have one of my favorites in multiple scenes, the highly underrated Lana Violet.
Cons:
- It's mostly nitpicking, model list includes men and there's no way to filter the men out. Unless I missed it.
- Some scenes never really feel like a massage scene. That could be the use of known pornstars. No offense is meant to Asa Akira but as soon as I see her I think porn!
Bottom Line:
I have to admit something about my interest in this genre. Over the last few months, I started dating an Esthetician. It has opened my eyes to this profession, massages and waxes. I've also talked about how I sometimes delve into the dark world of fantasizing about the woman I'm with doing things with other men. Trust me, it's not that I like that side of me but it works.
Nuru Massage's older content especially goes into that part of massages. The newer content does to an extent but some of it really just feels like it could be a scene in a normal porn movie. The basis, again, especially in the older scenes, is a man (usually) goes to get a massage. The masseuse oils him up, giving him peeks up her skirt, at her cleavage and usually takes the porn turn when she notices the tent being pitched by the towel laying across his crotch. This works for me. Especially with the Asian models. Because the woman I've been dating is Filipino and the minute she thinks sex might happen she's ready. Doubt it if you must but there's at least one other member on here with a Filipino wife who would tell you the same thing. So, I really prefer the scenes with the Asian models.
I think these sites, any of them, these days are stuck with the models they have access to and more and more, whether on Bang Bros or Brazzers, there's a lack of interest/passion. Some of the newer scenes here at Nuru Massage also have that problem. The good part is, as far back as their content goes, you can get HD quality videos. It's kind of like you don't have to start at the newest content to find the best quality.
Any site that stays within their theme/niche has the potential to become repetitive but I will say they do a good job here of mixing things up. You get some F/F scenes, some with F/F/F, some M/F/F and the standard M/F which for me is the most believable. I think if I had the chance to produce a scene or two, I would look into working in more from less. Every scene doesn't have to progress to sex. Have it stop at a handjob or a blowjob. With the name "fantasy" in the network name, I would play more to that. Instead of following every other hardcore porn scene.
The models are very attractive. One of the ones I didn't know of that I really like is Rilynn Rae, other longtime favorites like Uma Jolie, even everybody's favorite MILF Brandi Love (she has a really good scene with Uma Jolie on All Girl Massage, in this network.) Keisha Grey is here with all her lovely curves. And as mentioned, Lana Violet who I originally knew of thanks to Twistys years ago. I find scenes of her about twice a year.
You also get the niche on top of niche with some scenes playing into the step-family niche. That is seen more on the All Girl Massage site with stepmoms and stepdaughters massaging each other. But there are some on Nuru as well. You know when Brandi Love shows up she's somebody's stepmother!
The navigation is very good across the network even. It's a Gamma network so if you've been a member of any of the Fame Digital networks, it works like those do. You have the different network sites on the left and can go to each seamlessly. At the top you have categories, which is more useful here than on a lot of sites because you can pick the actions you want to see and it lists them by the action. I'll point out here that I myself like the "Pussy rubbing cock" action and while it might be a little too broad in its results, it does pull out (not intended) the scenes with that great tease.
They have the model list with the problem mentioned in the cons but that's pretty common for networks to include the males in the list. I really believe the only problem that can be legitimately be complained about is it can become repetitive. My years of only joining solo sites tells that repetitive doesn't bother me as long as it's good repetitive. Most of this content is good. It adds almost a softer side to hardcore but doesn't fall into heartcore area.
The other complaint is my own. Just mix it up some, beyond F/F scenes and F/F/F scenes. Have the masseuse use a wand massager on the guy's back and thighs and then in-between her and him. It's minor stuff that I think would keep the content fresher. No complaints on the quality. I will say the picture sets are screenshots from the videos so it's not a 50-100 picture set of just the female. It's hard to complain about that these days since a lot of sites are going completely away from pictures. As that old saying goes something is better than nothing. I think this site would appeal to those who like hardcore, those who like a theme and those who know an Esthetician who likes to tell you about her experiences doing waxes (close enough to massages) and how the clients (both female and male) "respond". I haven't checked out all of the network yet but I will and maybe some of my own twisted fantasies are in here somewhere. As a network it's very good and recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the most technically-impressive, female-friendly, somewhat-artsy, websites on the internet.
- A more sexual version of Met-Art from Met-Art.
- Top-tier female models, including some favorites from Met-Art doing things they don't do on Met-Art.
- Very good fetish content, especially clothing fetishes.
- Production values are so high you might think you're watching a blockbuster Hollywood film.
- Photos and videos are both well-represented. Will go further in BL.
- Navigation is excellent and usually straight-forward.
- If you're into artsy hardcore they have quite a few sets where the models wear clothing and even partial masks to add to the plot.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max).
- Not surprising to me but the solo sets are my favorites on here and should be joined by solo fans just for those.
- At this point, has a lot of content.
- Updates daily
Cons:
- It's going to be too artsy for some. Some are going to say, "Why are you covering that pretty model's face?"
- The hardcore sets are hit or miss, some are very good and others are average at best.
- Those live girl ads.
Bottom Line:
It seems fitting that I review Sex Art after reviewing X-Art last week. I've noted before on nearly every site owned or managed by Met-Art that you're going to have trouble finding much to complain about. Sex Art is the same way. Just pulling out numbers, resolutions, it's very impressive to see how much work they put into their site and content. I get the feeling they have someone who is live on each set and this person is OCD, they go around making sure every single object in the room is perfect, nothing distracting is going on and that appeals to me to a point. It also can become boring.
I still don't understand why Met-Art started Sex Art then came out with Met Art X. I'm pretty sure Met Art X is just solo masturbation but Sex Art has that too. Get the OCD person in there. Things are getting confusing. I'm going to do the numbers first because that's where Sex Art is at its best.
1,001 films as they call them, scenes, videos to most. Their lowest available high resolution is 1080p dating back to film #1. There are around 250 films with the 4K option, too. Each of these films can be downloaded in resolutions from 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K if newer. They are some of the crispest videos I've watched. Sound is good and clear, too.
1,400 photo sets, roughly 4500 long end resolution, the amount of photos does vary from maybe 70 to 150. They are available to download in 3 different sizes. Maybe better than any site, these models almost always start out dressed in regular clothes. Similar sites do this too but a lot of them get by with the "panties and bra are fully clothed". If this helps put some perspective on it, I have a folder with 768 of their photo sets in it.
580 female models, so quite a few have more than 1 video or photo set. I used to think Sex Art was going to get my first-ever 100 score. I know the content is often vanilla to hardcore fans but they do everything they're supposed to do and surpass nearly all standards. I've not pulled the trigger on the 100 for a few reasons. The live girl ads. They're not really obtrusive but I've almost clicked them a dozen times. The videos that don't have any chemistry hurts some. It's just not quite there. And that's okay, too. I'm sure if they fixed those, I would find something else to complain about!
The last time I reviewed both Sex Art and X-Art, I felt Sex Art was a little better and I still feel that way. I see Sex Art as 5-6 points better than X-Art. Though, neither should take offense, I doubt any of the other "heartcore" sites would get an 80 from me. It's kind of strange to say this but if this was just a solo site, the score would be higher. They're going to tell me to try Met-Art X.
They have pulled away from the "series" style of films and I think that's a good move. They had ongoing series like "Girls Love Sex" and "Kamikaze Love" but I think it limited them.
They have a relationship with models that I've tried to think of a word to use to describe it but can't figure it out. As an example, maybe she's still very active but a set last week has Suzie Carina in it and I've not see her in nearly a decade. She still looks great, too. It's almost like they can get any model that's active. One of my favorites is Lorena B, she's a good example of how they have multiple videos/photos of one model. She has 34 photo sets and 15 videos on here.
While I'm happy with the navigation some might say it's too minimal. The scenes have tags on them and you can use those to find scenes with the same tags but there's no "category" search. So, if you like anal, you have to hope someone tagged a scene as anal. I did a search on the site to see if "anal" brings up anal scenes and I don't think it works. One of the results was a set named, "Analogies". That's where being a regular member works against a review. I join and can look back to see what I last downloaded and just start from there.
The models here, like other heartcore sites, are slender or athletic, not a lot of racial diversity but there is some and tattoos and implants are minimal. The picture sets here, like X-Art, are my favorite part. I like the Sex Art videos a little more. I join twice a year, actually moved my membership month up a bit this year since I've bumped off some sites from my regular rotation. I hope they continue doing variations in the fetishes (hose, panties, short-shorts) as I think it's a newer strength for their site. If you're used to the old Met-Art it can be fun being a member here since you get in the routine of the photo sets stopping at the fully nude parts but they go all the way here. A 96 might be as high as I can go on Sex Art and I would recommend it to those into clothing fetishes, solo models, pretty models, some of the models look too young models and of course for those who like heartcore style male/female porn
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the internet's top artsy but hardcore sites.
- The quality throughout is very high.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of my max) but the site sometimes is a bit slow to load. It's not my internet and my computer is considered a still viable computer in video gaming. I'll go a little more into in the BL.
- The models. Some of the prettiest models in the world and they use high production values.
- Update schedule isn't consistent but it works out to 3-4 updates a week.
- CCBill as the biller, there was a cross-sale and it was checked, it's to their other site. Kind of hard to see because their signup page is black.
- If you've ever liked their content, you probably still will. I think they're one of the most consistent sites.
- While it has nearly 1,000 videos, I join it for for the picture sets. They have some of the best picture sets I've ever seen.
- It's one of the few standalone sites these days that gives you your money's worth and more.
Cons:
- My score reflects the 5 point automatic drop. I hate this site's navigation. It annoys the hell out of me. The videos navigation is very good. The model's list is very good. The updates, which is the only way to find the photo sets, is one long page of scrolling. I expected a change on that but it hasn't happened.
- I'm trying not to use the word "heartcore" because I for some reason really like this site but don't typically like heartcore. But that is very much a con for some. It's kind of mushy.
Bottom Line:
X-Art to me is a site you could join for a year and wouldn't get tired of the content, if you like the content. And, it might take a year to get to the bottom of the updates page! Why isn't that fixed? If nothing else, easy fix here, stick a photos "tab" up there with "videos" and have 30-40 photo sets per page. I think I broke my my mouse's scrolling wheel on this site. I have no idea how much content there is overall because I get to 2013 and stop scrolling but open the videos, 40 per page, 24 pages. I not only know roughly how many videos but I can jump from page to page too. I was going to just do a 5 point deduction, but I believe an 8 point deduction is more fitting.
That wouldn't be a problem but I come for the photo sets. That's really my only legit complaint. I thought I had got around it. There's a drop-down menu that has "photos" in it. But all that did was put all the photo sets on the long, scrolling page!
If you've not been to X-Art before, it fits that "female-friendly" genre of porn. I hope I'm not being sexist by saying that. I know women who love the most hardcore porn on the internet. So, I'll say, in general, this is a more "realistic", mushy, kind of lovey style of porn. They still get very hardcore at times but it's done tastefully. That was the hardest paragraph I've ever typed in a review!
As I've gotten older, I have started liking the teen-style models but they're still not my favorites. And most of the models here fit the teen-type, slender, very pretty, if there are tattoos you don't see them often and implants are either a no-no or very rare. It's also not just male/female. They have quite a bit of lesbian too and some solo too.
I don't know if this is a negative but I like their pictures better than the videos. It's most-likely me. I haven't been joining or downloading much what I call "regular porn videos". I have downloaded 38 (exact count) so far at X-Art, so it's not that the videos are bad. Their picture sets have my favorite thing in porn photos, the models going from (usually)dressed fully to fully nude and they do enough of the in-between dressed and nude photos in their sets. They excel at it. The newest photo update wasn't one of my favorites. It's titled "Sex with Gymnasts". It's a lesbian set. There's nothing in the photos to make me think they're gymnasts. I was excited to download and view it. There's no stretching or upskirt splits. And they're nearly nude at the beginning! I hear gymnasts and I think tight shorts or tight leggings. But that's rare for them.
Videos are 965 in count, since January 2016, they've had the 4K option on the videos. It is a little sporadic back when they first started it but they're offering it on all of the newer videos. This shows the quality, at least to me, over those 965 videos, 961 have 1080p option. They also have 720p, 540p and 480p. The pictures are all downloadable and are 4000 long end in the "large" download file.
I even think I understand why I like their photos so much, the lighting is very natural. So you don't get the real warm colors like some sites use but you also do get crisp colors and I would even say the colors are more of a cool color. That's become more important as I've got older and my eyes don't especially like bright, vivid colors.
I also know why the site loads so slowly. It's that long scrolling page. Their "thumbnails" for each set are 350x400 resolution and I would estimate there's over 2,000 of those on that page.
I do like their solo videos. They have some with big toys and some with little toys and the models, as said, are very pretty.
As for the main male/female content: I've at least got over the feeling that it's silly to try and project love in a porn video but it's not just that. It's the mushy part that I don't do well with. I don't even do that mushy stuff in my life. They're up there making love. And I think that's where it loses me because I like the teasing and the playfulness and then they should go at it like jackrabbits. They never seem to respond to the teasing and playfulness like they've been teased. It's still not a big negative. The content is popular with some people and I'm okay with that.
The site is still a top site that's worth joining at least once. Can't complain at all about the technical quality or what looks like someone spends some time actually setting the scenes up. Just don't expect any double ass to mouth or even hair-pulling. Maybe that's why I like the solo videos better? Some of those solo ones look like they're trying to tear their insides out.
With solo content becoming more rare and focus on photos becoming even rarer, those who like those should definitely check this site out. And their lesbian content is on par with a typical lesbian scene. If they would fix that scrolling page so I could see all the photo sets, I would jump it up to 96-98 but that page will annoy some people. So, I'm going with a 90.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the better blowjob-focused sites/networks.
- Has seen a lot of change in both how the site looks and how it works, all for the positive.
- An interesting feature by adding a live intercourse video every few days. As I've said before, at least this one is trying.
- Averages right at one update per day (across the network).
- Has some kinkiness, from gaping to pissing to deep-throating, pretty sure Veronica Avluv can't film a scene without pissing in it.
- Mostly known porn stars. Sometimes that's a pro, sometimes a con.
- Download speeds are very good (80% of max).
- Their live site, Immoral Live, really helps the network as a whole. It's really the only site on this network that goes into sex and the content on it is pretty good. You can watch live or download the recorded show.
- The navigation works better than I remember it working, this network is the same as the old My XXX Pass. But see cons...
- Pretty big network, will go into in BL
Cons:
- Navigation works well but man is it ever cluttered? Don't mind me, I'm the OCD guy. I will go further on this in the BL (that's how much it annoys me).
- Eventually, you can have too many blowjobs. It can be quite repetitive. The site names tell you that: Throated, Mommy Blows Best, 1000 Facials, Only Teen Blowjobs and Immoral Live.
- The network itself isn't bad for ads but there was a pre-checked cross-sale and seconds after unchecking it and submitting my payment, a pop up popped up for the exact SAME offer they offered in the pre-checked cross-sale!
Bottom Line:
I'm really not looking to be too harsh. This network has always been a solid network. They do a lot of things right. Including:
Picture sets that you can download
High quality videos (4K available on the newer ones).
Very large catalog of content and the site itself is a "clean" site unless you look at the menu toolbar.
It's there that you have these options:
Videos, Pornstars, Pictures, Forum, Interactive Porn, Free scene, Dating, Live Sex, Specials. That's a lot in one horizontal bar, right? There's another one above it! Above it, you have your profile, the Blow Pass logo or homepage button, Throated, 1000 Facials, Mommy Blows Best, Only Teen Blowjobs and Immoral Live ... but wait, there's also a clock that is counting down the time to the next Immoral Live show too.
I've said it many times, if my dad ever taught me one thing that I hold onto it's KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid). I'm not really complaining that much but as nice as this network looks, it looks like they would work on the clutter and double ad mentioned in the cons.
The content here is good. The models are mostly American, tattoos and implants are common. The numbers are very good:
3,897 scenes, the earliest update dates back to 2005 and it was one of my favorite models, Tiffany Taylor. Most if not all scenes have photos too.
You will run into the lower quality problems in the older scenes. The oldest ones are 360p. From there, you get random quality.
Immoral Live has the best quality with up to 4K options, its content dates back to 2011 and the 2011 videos have up to 1080p. Very little to complain about there.
The other sites date back in the 2005-2006 range and the first 5 years of those sites have varying quality. The newer content has 1080p but not 4K.
They have nearly 2,000 models (1920 or so). I'll continue to return to that one con, the amount of blowjobs are great for those into oral scenes but for me any niche like this will become boring.
I will say Throated can be somewhat extreme. I know we've had discussions about what constitutes a deep-throat and for me it's mascara dripping down the model's face and dry heave sounds, they have both of those. I know that there are some who prefer that style of oral sex, they would really like this network.
In scoring this site, I am scoring it a little higher than I see it. It's similar to when someone tries a solo site and they expected more than solo. I don't think it's fair of me to go taking points away for reasons that might not bother others.
There's a lot of content with a lot of models. Many older A-list models too, I even seen Rebecca Linares in the model list. I had completely forgot about her. There's also plenty of cute, newer models like Jenna Fox, Kitty Carerra and one of my old favorites that I had forgot about Cindy Starfall. So, it's okay for me as a collector and I think it's very good for someone looking for a large collection.
They have multiple scenes of many of the models, like Cindy Starfall, who has a scene as far back as 2012 and they just updated with a new scene of her here in 2018. She has 7 scenes, total. To go back to a strength for a site like this one and it's why I most likely remembered it in a positive way, some of their photo sets are very good. It fits here because my favorite photo set of Cindy Starfall is from this network.
I don't remember if I complained about this in my review of the network when it was My XXX Pass but one of the more frustrating parts for me is that the blowjob rarely progresses. I know blowjob is in the name and people will complain if anything more than a blowjob happens but that in and of itself is what leads to the boredom. I have had the same type of complaint with handjob sites and though it goes against the name, I like CFNM sites that end up having the woman naked too.
I would review Immoral Live separately because I do think it adds way more than would be expected but I've yet to be able to watch one of the shows live. Looks like the next live show is Thursday morning at 9 AM EST. I'm in an office at 9 AM. The recorded scenes I've watched are pretty good.
It's a good network overall that has a new name and a new coat of paint. It would be rated higher for those who are into the more extreme parts I listed above and who are into blowjob porn. I'll grab the scenes I've lost from my collection over the years. There's also a lot of content but keep in the mind the technical limitations of the older content, too.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the largest and in my opinion, best, lesbian sites.
- Massive catalog of content, earliest content dates back to 2003.
- Is now part of a network (Sapphix) which includes Give Me Pink and Fist Flush.
- Carries a tagline that fits ... "Pretty girls doing it right". See cons.
- Very high technical quality on videos and photos.
- Good DL speeds (80-85% of max)
- Billing, canceling, is easy though I'm not familiar with the biller (AXSCharge), original billing was handled by Rocketpay but canceling went through AXSCharge, maybe it's the same company?
- Carries a level of eroticism that only Viv Thomas matched.
- Many A-list Euro models.
- More tribbing than any site that I know of.
- Very clean website design, no ads in the members area, comes off as professional.
- Falls into either the top 10 or top 5 all-time in all genres.
- Very fast "fixes" to site problems, will explain in BL.
Cons:
- The biggest complaint that I will call legitimate but won't say I care about it, is a real lesbian will say these models aren't lesbians.
- Updates have slowed on Sapphic Erotica to one every 4 days. Maybe not a con in the truest sense but I'm nitpicking.
- The mainstream era (2011-2014) content just doesn't do much for me.
Bottom Line:
Lesbian porn is one of the most difficult genres for me to review. My closest co-worker for the last 5 years, is 100%, way out of the closet, lesbian. She doesn't "look" like a lesbian. The first time we worked together, she introduced herself and her sexual preference to me by saying, "You better not start flirting with my girlfriend." But I did! Part of this review is based on her opinion that she has shared with me. Her biggest problem with lesbian porn is she says it's just not realistic. Then she laughs and says, "Or we're just not very good at it". She crushed my every lesbian fantasy by saying she's never tribbed and neither has any of her lesbian friends. So, I'll stop with that part and get to my view of lesbian porn since who needs reality when there's 2-4 very pretty women kissing and naked?
Sapphic Erotica's tagline for as long as I can remember has been, "pretty girls doing it right". In all my years on PU, I've made it pretty clear that I like natural women BUT I don't hold tattoos against the models and sometimes I even like the tattoos (see Dragon Lily, Satine Phoenix and Regan Reese). I also like natural boobs but (not a big but) I can look over implants. I've told about one of the models Sapphic Erotica has a lot of content of named Zafira. One of the prettiest mid-2000s Euro models. She realized one of her boobs was bigger than the other so she had implants (nearly same size as natural) to even them out. She falls into that category of "more people would say those are natural than implants". That's the type of implants I have no problems with.
Which to me is what Sapphic Erotica goes for with the "pretty girls doing it right" tagline. You would be hard-pressed to find another site with more feminine, natural, no tattoos, no implants, models, than Sapphic Erotica.
So, if you're into 18-24 year old, mostly slender, some average/sporty builds with hardly no tattoos, no implants, Sapphic Erotica, a lesbian site, is a site you would probably love. Some liked to call this style of models and porn, "Glam" but this isn't glam. It's "normal", sorry dating is horrible in 2018, trying to find a "normal" woman who doesn't kill spiders with her hand, drinks a 12 pack of beer and goes hunting on the weekend is becoming increasingly hard. These are what people call, "girly-girls". They know they're pretty and they want you to know it too.
Sapphic Erotica is right up there with Viv Thomas when it comes to creating passionate sex films. Sex Art tries it but I don't think it works as good with a man and woman as it does with 2 or 4 women. Most of the scenes start off with the models fully-clothed (skimpy). And usually ends with one pretty girl's butthole pressed down on the other pretty girl's tongue. In-between, there's deep kissing, heavy touching, nipple-squeezing, fingering (toys aren't too common), dry-humping that turns into tribbing and of course, lots of 69s.
That's real to me! I very easily can imagine two college girls being bored, admiring how pretty the other is then suddenly getting lost in 30 minutes of lesbian sex.
Here's the numbers:
1,747 scenes (videos and downloadable pictures) They have been offering 4K on all videos since late 2015 and 1080p on all videos since late 2006!
The models number is a bit harder to find since the model list covers Give Me Pink, Fist Flush and Sapphic Erotica and it's over 1,000.
In my review of their network, I noted that I scored Give Me Pink higher than the full network. The reason was a glitch in the navigation of the network that made it very hard to separate the sites. Well, they fixed it. So, I would change their tagline to, "Webmasters doing it right". The navigation on Sapphix (network hub) lets you click the drop down box and pick which site you want to see content from, in this example, Sapphic Erotica. Where the glitch was happening was when I clicked on any page except page 1, it wouldn't load. That's fixed and you can now search from within each site with the "tags" that are very useful and accurate.
The part I call the "mainstream era" is an era of Sapphic Erotica where the content became very formulaic. The good part is, pretty girls, have been part of their formula the whole time. I don't know what the not-to-distant future of porn is but I do believe Sapphic Erotica and this Sapphix network has established itself as the top lesbian/all girl network. My scoring changed on Sapphix once they got the navigation problem fixed so it's a 95 and Sapphic Erotica to me, is also a 95. I mainly scored them this way because I don't think you even need an interest in Give Me Pink or Fist Flush to get your money's worth with a subscription. Those two sites are like icing on the cake or gravy on your mashed potatoes or two wet clits sticking together.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
