Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Euro glamour models go hardcore!
- 190 scenes as of 2-28-09, new full scene added weekly.
- Newer videos are 1280 high end, older ones are 512 high end
- Photos for all sets, zipped
- Is available as a bonus site with instant access by joining zoliboy.com
- Could stand on its own for collectors of rare content
Cons:
- Nitpicking, the older videos are 512 high end, but I had a few of these years ago and they were 320 high end and were split into pieces, these are the full scenes at 512, don't have enough video expertise to know if it would be too hard to up a 320 original to 1280. But as I said, it is a nitpick.
- Might make you look at those glamour girls a little different than you did!
- The updates do come in "pieces" so they can say they update daily, but in reality, they are updating once a week with a full scene. The pieces come during the week, then the full scene download is at the end of the week.
Bottom Line:
For two or three years, Pix and Video had this intro page with a picture of Eve Angel bent over having doggystyle sex with a man. I would say I have had 10 or more guys ask me where that clip was at. It was originally on Club Sandy as "Eve Getting it Hard in the Bathroom" or something like that, but it was removed several years ago.
Well, it is here! As a matter of fact, the number 1 voted video on the site. There are more of these very rare hard to find clips, some still appear on Club Sandy, but not all, and the new updated videos look to be completely new. There is the Anetta Keys hardcore set with her real-life boyfriend, they have it here. How about Tiffany Diamond and Sophie Moone in a boy-girl-girl hardcore set? It is here too! Though Sophie doesn't have sex with the guy, she gets very into it, as much as 3 nearly 4 fingers into it.
These are a couple of the more known hardcore scenes that collectors look for since you can't get them anymore on the sites they used to be on. Also of note, Candy aka Nikki Miller, has 3 hardcore videos on here. I had never seen any of those. And the much talked about, much questioned, model named Pink Pussy that had a truly great hardcore scene, then disappeared, they have it here too. I had seen it years ago and thought it was Sandy from Club Sandy, but don't think it was, but the scene is excellent.
Barbora, the underused Euro glamour model has a hardcore scene here as well. There are 190 scenes, and all of them are good. You just don't see Euro models in a lot of hardcore clips, but every clip here is hardcore. How about the newer Euro Sabrinka, very pretty girl, she has a scene on here that was just updated recently where she nearly rides the guy into the ground. I would have never believed it if I hadn't seen it!
The numbers are good enough, newer updates are 1280 high end and all pictures are zipped, they have a middle area where some videos were 720 high end and then the older ones are 512. Those 512 ones were 320 years ago, so I guess that improvement is better than nothing and all scenes are downloadable in full scenes.
I really would have paid the full price for this site on its own, but I do consider myself a collector of the Euro models. If I were to compare it to a site, I would compare it to Hands on Hardcore by DDF. Similar models, great action, and a new scene each week. That is very impressive to me for a free bonus site. I noticed several of the 21st Sextury sites include instant access to this one, so be sure to look for it when joining one of those, I got it through Zoliboy, it is one of the few Euro hardcore sites you will find on the internet and I don't think you will be disappointed.
Glad to see that some of these videos that collectors have searched for have finally been brought back in the archives sections. Recommended highly as one of your bonus site and would recommend it straight out to collectors!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hardcore lesbian porn with a few guys making recent appearances
- 555 scenes as of 11/27/2020 with 3 updates per week during current times.
- Video downloads at 320p, 480p, 720p and 1080p.
- Decent quality photo downloads that are 90% screencaptures.
- Good download speed at 80% of my max.
- Mostly fun scenes even if they’re trying to be more hardcore.
Cons:
- Some of the older scenes have been removed.
- It could be easier to find scenes/actions with better tags.
Bottom Line:
Hot and Mean has been around a long time. There’s reason to believe early in the site’s life there were maybe some problems that caused them to have to remove some of the scenes. I do remember the site being more hardcore in the earlier days. It’s a little more advanced when it comes to lesbian porn. You will see some slapping, even some spitting but it’s hardly violent or anything like you would see on a Kink channel.
They have a large collection of 555 scenes. This is growing quickly as the updates have sped up to 3 per week. I want to say there was even a time they had stopped updating this site but something must have changed. They do not have any 4K videos. The newer videos have 1080p, 720p, 480p and 320p. The 1080p videos are nice and crisp. The 720p are even good quality. The photos could be better quality and they could have more photos of the models in their clothes before the scenes start but that’s not really a big deal or anything to complain too much about. You can download them in a zip.
The name of the site gives you an idea of what the content is like. There is usually one of the models who is being the “mean” one. Their definition of mean is broad. It could be that she’s bratty and wants the other model to do what she wants. That is a change from the old content. The older content had more of the degrading talk and slaps.
I will add that if you join be sure to join through PU/TBP. I received full downloads by going through the PU links. Those downloads usually cost $15 extra.
The models are your standard hardcore American models. There are some tattoos, some implants but overall, the models are very attractive. You will get some inconsistent performances with some of the models being the typical “just here for a check” models. It’s still a large site and has a lot of good content it that gives you a little different view of lesbian porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An often overlooked site that's genre could also cause it to be looked over.
- Despite now being a network site it still delivers 4 updates per week (pictures/videos) in each.
- Has a huge catalog of content, over 2,500 scenes.
- A strong pro for me is it has the foot and leg fetishes involved, but there's also plenty of sex, pretty posing and everything you'd expect from a hardcore site not a foot/leg fetish site.
- Very good quality videos, 1080p videos date back to 2010-2011 and are still in every update.
- Photos can be downloaded in 3 sizes, topping out at 2000 long end and have been and still are some of the best photos you'll see.
- Has the added bonus of being in a network that covers nearly all genres.
- Download speeds are above-average and consistent.
- Navigation is as good as you'll find on a network, though you'll still run into the occasional glitch.
- Archive dates back to 2001, you'll find nearly every top Euro model on this site.
Cons:
- The price without the TBP/PU discount
- Fetish content always carries the potential of being repetitive.
- A small percentage of the foot/leg scenes won't go beyond foot teasing, leg flirting, etc...
Bottom Line:
Way back in the old says of online porn (early 2000s to mid 2000s), DDF sold this as a standalone site and it cost a premium price, seems like $30 back then per month.
Things have changed. I think it's both a good thing and a bad thing in this case. It's easy to see how someone would avoid this site since they might think it's a lot of toe worshiping, toe-sucking and so on. I'll say ahead of time, I'm not into feet, but this is one of my all-time favorite sites. I've always liked hose, fishnets on women and there's all kinds of those scenes on this site.
There's plenty of hardcore here as well as lesbian action. There's a smaller amount of solo and and even smaller amount of tease/very softcore.
The models, as with most Euro sites, are almost always very pretty ... at worst. DDF's sites aren't quite as glam as they used to be and that's now a plus for me. It used to would have been a negative.
The amount of content competes well with almost any 100% exclusive site. Over 2,500 videos, over 2,500 photo sets and the videos have the 1080p option and have for the last 5-6 years.
So, why should someone join it if they're not into feet and/or legs? Simple. The leg and feet category was one that Viv Thomas, DDF and Fred the photographer excelled at. The focus though isn't just on the feet and legs. It's on the panties slipping down the legs then off the feet. It's sensual in ways most porn these days can't even touch. Nothing in these scenes seems hurried. Could be two women in a pool, teasing each other with their toes, which leads to the panties sliding down, which leads to rubbing their legs together, touching, kissing, and finally what looks like believable out of control sex.
The solo scenes offer similar as well. You'll have a solo model teasing the camera, rubbing her own legs, rubbing her feet, panties start sliding and she goes into a wild masturbation.
The scenes with guys involved are also very good. Lots of teasing, fairly good chemistry between the guy and girl (also rare these days), there are footjobs, there are cumshots up legs, but it's still sex, just a little more sensual than we're used to seeing on most mainstream sites.
I would even say I would join it by itself without the network for a month. One of my favorite parts about their videos is they don't go overboard with the bit stream of the videos. A 25 minute 1080p video will be around 1.5 GB instead of the 3-4 GB you see on a lot of sites. I know that's a preference, but I really can't see enough difference between a 1080p video with 3,000 bitrate from one with 1080p with 10,000 bitrate, except in the time it takes to download and the space it takes up on my external hard drive.
I do think the pictures have taken a slight backseat to the quality they used to have on here, but from what I understand DDF is no longer the photographer, so it's to be expected.
The navigation on Hot Legs and Feet could be slightly better. We're getting into the area where less is more. There's 15 years of scenes on here. Just something to make it a little easier to find older scenes. I have trouble remembering all the different model names and end up trying to search through 127 pages of scenes. But maybe that's not a complaint? I was once told if I couldn't offer a fix then there's no reason to complain about it. I do believe their navigation is close to as good as you can get on a site like this one. My advice is to use the model list instead of trying to dig through 127 pages.
Last, the network that comes with this site has no less than 6 other sites I've joined in the past for $30 each. This is a really great deal for Euro-lovers especially. The only deductions I took off the score was for repetitiveness and the lack of adding anything new to the scenes. It was somewhat groundbreaking 15 years ago, but now it just looks like really high production quality porn. I've always believed the leg/feet sex sites were the precursors to today's heartcore sites. Definitely worth a join for anyone.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- High Quality, DDF site
- Pictures go up to 2000 on high end and are available to download in zips.
- Newer movies are HD and there are over 900 video clips
- Site has a classy feel to it, maybe it is because of the emphasis on legs and feet?
- I'm getting some of my best download speeds, over 1100kb/s on a 10M connection
- Just about every great model you know who Europe that are the other DDF sites, and there is a lot of content overall!
Cons:
- You know things are good when I start nitpicking on the first con, I'm not going to say the price is too high, but I guess it is just seems that way at first, price on TBP despite having an American dollar sign is in Euros. So, as of now, what is listed as $24.95 on TBP is actually $36.74.
- Older movies are a lower quality than average, this can be a slight negative if your favorite model has a lot of older material.
- More fishnet, can never get fishnet!
Bottom Line:
Let me start by saying that I love this site. The quality is top level, very few sites can even match it. The emphasis of leg and feet kind of worried me since I don't have a real leg or feet fetish. The model list pulled me in though. If you can name her and she is a Euro star, she is on here.
The biggest and best surprise for me was the amount of content. I really hadn't seen much of this site before joining. It reminds me a great deal of 1byday, DDF's big site. There is less hardcore here, but you get a new kind of porn from this site. One that lets you look at the women as beautiful. It has a very high tease factor in every video that I downloaded. Which for me is very important.
The HD videos are incredible. My only complaint there is that I have to keep buying external hard drives to store all of the content I download.
Pictures are very clear, let me add the word, "clean". No blurriness, just clear, well-lit pictures in 2000 resolution. Some of the models really show that they belong on a runway, moreso than in front of a camera with a dildo. Eve Angel's clip with Eufrat, both in nurses outfits, made me want to check in the hospital for a month or so!
The negatives are far and few between. Price will catch US members off guard, but I've been to enough crappy $20 per month sites, that I don't mind putting out the $36 for this high quality content that I keep and watch more than 1 time.
I recommend this site with as much enthusiam as possible!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Many years away from the New Sensations network. Didn’t this used to be Brain Pass? This is a not so clear site. They got me with Clary Trinity scenes.
- The site design is very nice but I’m having issues with it. My browser (Firefox) doesn’t seem to want to always load it properly. I do want to compliment how nice the site looks.
- This is an updating site, just updated today, there are now 502 scenes.
- Impressed with the download options. They give you multiple bitrate downloads for each resolution.
- Very good photosets, this company always kept a focus on photos that are not just sex.
- Download speeds are very good (90% of my max). I really am ready to start crediting my ISP on that one.
- Pro models, pro sets, professional camerawork.
Cons:
- I don’t know if they decided to change this site’s theme. The earliest scenes were more like cuckolding. With the husband watching. The newer ones don’t really go into that. That’s an important part to the site.
- The site has some problems loading. I somehow got on their ad page. And half of the ads didn’t show up and my browser was saying the ads are not secure.
Bottom Line:
I saw where Hot Wife XXX was going to have a scene with Clary Trinity in it and that was enough for me. It is on the New Sensations network. I’m very familiar with this studio and network. I loved Four Finger Club years ago. I hadn’t been a member for years. This site itself, Hot Wife XXX, I don’t go too much into my personal life. I have always had the fantasy of walking in on the woman I love with another man. The joke I always make is, I don’t know what my reaction would be. It could get messy. I am a big guy. No matter how hard I try, I am cast into the dominant role. I enjoy this type of porn that plays to a fantasy of mine.
That’s where I’m confused. The newer scenes don’t seem to play to that fantasy at all. They do have in the newer scenes a series called, “A Bull for My Hotwife”. Maybe Covid is playing a part in keeping multiple people out of scenes? The older scenes are more like cuckolding. That is the main theme. To my surprise, New Sensations is really putting a lot of work into these scenes. The videos are long. The photosets are near 6000 long end. The models are very attractive. I am going to mention that Jax Slayher is on this site. He annoys me. He’s too robotic. The female models are top-tier.
I believe New Sensations dropped off some in the past. I didn’t realize they are back up. I thought it was more like an archive network. The scenes on this site do go into some clothing fetishes with office sex and office clothes, at the beginning of the scenes. That’s what I like about their pictures. They do take pictures of the female still dressed. I think that’s the part of the videos I fast-forward. All of the scenes are not office. Some are in the bedroom, maybe a hotel even. You do have pro models throughout the site. That means tattoos are going to make some appearances and implants. It does look like New Sensations is bringing in the younger, natural models.
The navigation is good. The download options impressed me a lot. They have on most of the newer scenes, 720p, 1080p and 4K. Each one two different bitrate versions. I go for the smaller one myself. The photos have the high resolution downloads. One thing I like seeing is the navigation is for this specific site, not the whole network. I can select “Wives” and it shows all the models just on this site. That’s something a lot of networks have problems with. I’m going to check their other sites. I hadn’t been a member of HotWifeXXX. I’m glad I tried it and get to see that New Sensations is at least still kicking.
Specifically, to this site, this is going to be a site that those into cuckolding will like, especially the older scenes. I believe beyond that it’s just good one on one hardcore sex. They do not seem to be limiting the sex. The scene length shows that. There are over 300 “wives” on the site. You will have a hard time finding an unattractive one. It’s good porn. I do think they need to return the earlier style of their scenes. This is very good site that could easily stand on its own.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A different site than you'll usually find on a network.
- Really is a large site considering it's part of a network. Has nearly 1,000 scenes on it.
- Has been around since 2007, but even so, the oldest scenes have a 540p option, 720p and 1080p came soon after.
- DDF's network is easily one of my favorites and it's sites like this one that's easily missed that makes it a great network.
- Despite the content looking to be fairly hardcore to fairly extreme, it's nearly all very accessible to the average viewer.
- Averages one new scene (video + pictures) per week.
- Very good photo sets included with each scene and are downloadable in zips, biggest problem is similar to many other sites, not enough pictures in the sets.
- Around 7-8 MB/s download speed which is on my higher end.
- Excellent navigation, it looks a little cluttered and maybe it is, but it works good.
- Your chance to see some of your favorite softcore models getting a little kinkier than you're used to seeing
Cons:
- DDF's network has had struggles for years now with scene counts. Those are still around. In one place, House of Taboo says it has nearly 1,200 videos, in another it says 990.
- To be honest, if you're looking for something that's a little harder than your average mainstream porn, this will do the trick, but if you're looking for scenes on the level of say kink.com, your expectations will fall short.
Bottom Line:
I admit, when DDF first launched this site I was surprised. I mainly knew DDF for pretty, glam sex, solo girls, pretty clothes, perfect make-up, then out of nowhere came House of Taboo.
I want to stress this point, this is not a good alternative to your favorite BDSM site or your favorite Kink site. That's not to say it's tame, but it is very controlled. One of the biggest selling points is there's models on here that you wouldn't ever see on a Kink site or a BDSM site.
I've wondered if many people even know this site exists. It's never really received a push from DDF, like One By Day, Hot Legs and Feet or even Eve Angel Official have received, but it's sort of a hidden gem on what is already a great network.
Here's some of the things/genres you can expect from this site:
Bondage, both with ropes and wraps.
Somewhat forced insertions, large dildos, sticks.
BDSM-style outfits, rubber suits, rubber masks
Dominatrix (usually only with another woman), including collars, blindfolds, ball gags.
Roleplaying, Doctor exam, jail prisoner.
Spanking and ... peeing.
I know some might consider anal sex to be kinky, but I think in 2016, it's become too much of a norm to be included in the above kinks.
The technical quality is excellent. As mentioned in the pros, the oldest content has 540p videos with 720p becoming standard by 2009 and 1080p becoming standard in early 2011.
I think this site would appeal to anyone that collected the glam Euro models from the mid-2000s. One of the most surprising scenes for me is of Zuzana Zeleznovova. She was one of the most softcore, pretty, almost innocent models I remember from the mid-2000s. On this site, she has a scene where she's bound in chains and pees on herself. Might not sound that extreme, but it was for her. Maybe the most shocking for me is a scene between Eve Angel and Jeny Baby. Eve plays a nurse role, while Jeny is strapped into a straightjacket. Eve proceeds to use a speculum on Jeny, stick various objects, including fingers into Jeny's butt and dominates her. Which if nothing else is funny if you've followed Eve's career as the sweet model who becomes devilish when horny.
The newer scenes don't seem to have as many well-known stars in them and there is a sudden influx of tattooed models, but they still stay true to the different genres.
I consider this a site worth checking out before joining DDF Network since I don't know of any other mainstream network that has anything like House of Taboo. I will say 21 Sextury used to, but after splitting their network into two sites, most of the more extreme sites ended up on a different network, which is why I'm leaning towards preferring DDF's Network. This site adds a nice balance to the network. I mean, we all know we get tired of looking at perfectly made-up, tanned, natural models having sex and need something different ever once in awhile.
My only real complaint is that you can tell some of the scenes are controlled. Sites and networks that specialize in BDSM and the kinkier genres of porn have learned how to make their scenes look less planned.
Great overall site though and one any DDF member should check out, if for no other reason, to see if any of your favorite, usually not too kinky models are doing something you've never seen them do. Would rank it as the third or fourth best site in the DDF Network and one worth joining the network for even if you've got most of the content from the other sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It could probably just be called MILF porn. Very attractive 30-40 year old women having sex.
- It’s a large site with 466 videos and 364 models.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Was updating with 4K scenes up until July 2020, now are starting to update with remasters
- Epoch is the biller.
- Very good photosets for a site like this and are downloadable.
Cons:
- It may be a little too vanilla for some. Some of these scenes are supposed to be a wife and her husband. There’s no stepfamily, paying the plumber twist to the scenes.
- The ads can be annoying since they look like the scenes.
Bottom Line:
You can just imagine a group of porn producers are sitting around and one says, “What if we just shot normal porn?” That’s what you get on this site. I believe that is its biggest selling point and its biggest weakness. It’s not heartcore or lovey porn. I don’t think real couples just have mushy sex. They don’t on this site either. There’s anal and swallowing, all kinds of real kinks you don’t know your next door neighbor does or your sister does.
Which is also a problem since this doesn’t look like porn to me. It looks like I found someone’s home video stash of them having sex with their spouse. It really makes you think or it does me. I honestly thought the name of the site was “Housewife Next Door” and kind of wish it was. I’ll give an example, I think they’re going for the feeling of you being married to the female. Gianna Dior has a very good scene on here but if I was married to her we would be doing some pubic hair trimming on her. That’s why I don’t think porn like this works. If you’re going to try and put the viewer in the role of the man in the scene then you need to let the viewer select what’s going to happen in the scene. I think ATK Girlfriends does the best job of creating the “this is your girlfriend” porn scenes. It’s not to say this site is bad. I’m just saying they could do more with this niche. The Gianna scene to show what they’re going for is titled, “Your wife Gianna fucks your cock”.
The pictures are very good. It’s rare to find a site/network that is known for hardcore sex but turns around and gives you what is very close to a legitimate photoshoot. They do this on several of their sites and I think it should be mentioned.
You also get very good technical quality. The videos since 2014 have 4K, 1080p, 720p and a few smaller ones to download. They also have a few shorter versions you can download of each scene. The photos are downloadable in zips. The site is a good-sized site with nearly 500 scenes.
I just get hung up on what I call philosophical differences. A lot of the scenes have POV use of the camera to make you feel like you’re part of the scene. Which hasn’t ever worked for me but it shows their goal with this site. I will compliment something I usually don’t, at least not recently, the houses, the settings, do add to the believable part of the scenes. I do like that they don’t film every scene in the bedroom. There are living room couch scenes, on the floor, in the kitchen and that too adds realism. I think I’m just so used to some crazy storyline that this type of porn just reminds me of real life. I still like my porn to be more fantasy than realistic. I’m sure there are people that prefer realistic and if so, you should check this site out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very intriguing site with close to 400 models.
- Has bonus sites, Honey School and Honey Index, which is a fast access portal to the models.
- Has feeds to other sites, looks to be over 20 or so
- Some older picture sets that I have not seen anywhere, as old as 2000.
- Quality of pics is decent, while videos are well above average
Cons:
- Horrible navigation, you can tell it's a New Sensations site.
- Most of the content can be found on other sites, especially pictures in much bigger resolutions
- Site feels incomplete, like the tech guys went home and forgot to finish it
- The major one for me, all videos that I found were cut into sections, 3-7 sections.
Bottom Line:
I liked a lot of things about this site. It is unusual when you find one part of the navigation to be perfect, only to find that it is horribly flawed. As you probably know I am an Eve Angel fan, so I went straight to her section, 1 video that I had never seen, but it was cut into 4 parts. The pictures of her included many that I have seen and maybe 5 sets that I hadn't. Most of the ones I hadn't were older sets back when Eve was nearing skinny levels.
On the other hand, I found many pictures of Sandra Shine that I hadn't seen before. See what I mean? For every good thing, there was a bad thing. Which is why it feels incomplete. The videos are fine quality in the 700x500 range, the pics are not near as good, I saw a few nearing 2,000, but many were under 1,000.
I don't like the way the actual Hungarian Honey's part is just pictures, then you click on "videos" and it takes you to that section. I would rather click on the model and have her videos and pics together. They are advertising 300-400 movies, maybe I'm missing them or just haven't went through them enough. Most of the movies don't list who the models are, instead, a catchy title like, "Two hot girls in the rain".
The only word I can come up with is incomplete. It's not a bad site by any means, the content is nice, but I keep waiting for this magic button to pop up and say, "Click here". I can recommend it only if you have never been on a Euro site. Otherwise, take the trial for $9.99, fully featured trial.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hustler, in my mind, the greatest name in hardcore porn.
- Huge site/network. I've seen some content as far back as the 80s, including the legendary, "Deep Inside Vanessa Del Rio".
- Hustler magazine pictorials to look at or download.
- Updates once or twice per week with a full DVD, it varies, so there's no way to put a set number on it or set frequency.
- Beaver Hunt category! My favorite section of Hustler magazine.
- Good download speeds, roughly 70% of my max speed.
Cons:
- A couple of my pros are actually not what they claim to be. Trust me, I'll go into in the BL.
- Video quality is below average at best.
- I once rated this "network" an 80, in 2007, here on PU. My average score is an 85.
- I thought, based on many of the professional reviews, that Hustler had got their site together and improved it. I thought wrong and wonder why it scored so highly in professional reviews. Not looking at that can of worms with a can opener.
- It's not a network. It's a DVD site that puts content, based on category, into a separate category that they so happen to call a different site.
Bottom Line:
Back when I first discovered porn it was a random VHS tape belonging to my uncle. I later found a whole stack of Playboy magazines under his bed. I'm sure I liked them and thought I had found a gold mine. Then, one day, I found a Hustler magazine in his room. I used multiple loud adjectives as I looked through the pages. So much nakedness, girls with fingers stuck in places, it was far greater than anything I had seen before.
When I turned 18, I had been psyching myself up to go to the local gas station and buy a brand new copy of Hustler. It then became a monthly habit. The rush, as I've told a few times, was maybe even greater than the magazine. This made Hustler my absolute favorite name in hardcore porn. And like most men who bought Playboy or Penthouse, I also read every story in Hustler. The jokes were tasteless and hilarious. Then there was the "Beaver Hunt" section of the magazine. It had used-submitted photos in it. Hustler would then pick the best one and give them a money prize. It had the dirty stories in it. Some seriously interesting political stories.
So, a few weeks ago, I thought I would join Hustler's website. It had been 9 years since I joined it. From everything I've read it's improved greatly since then. I joined ... and reality hit, buyer's remorse hit and my first "bad" review in a long time is now being posted.
First, in the categories is "Beaver Hunt". I click on it, it's DVDs from the Barely Legal series. It's not a bad series. It's also not "Beaver Hunt". I was honestly expecting user-submitted photos.
I then clicked on "Magz". I'm going to get to view all the digital issues of all Hustler magazines, right? Wrong. They only go back to 2007. Now hell, if you can put 1986's Deep Inside Vanessa Del Rio DVD on here, you can damn sure put the old magazines on here. It gets worse. No Beaver Hunt in the magazines that I could access. No joke section. No articles. Instead, a handful of pictorials from each magazine with 12-15 photos from each pictorial.
I cleared my head and decided to make the most out of what was quickly becoming the most disappointing porn site I have joined in years. I downloaded a few videos featuring models I like. They were okay, but were a bit blurry/fuzzy. Now these are newer models (Nicole Aniston, Veronica Rodriguez), maybe not "newer", but newer than Vanessa Del Rio. I look at the properties on the videos and see 960x540 resolution. These were downloaded from the "super quality" link. I go back to the available sites and enter "Hustler HD". Download the newest video available, it's 960x540. What the hell? It says HD in the name! I admit, I don't follow the resolution wars of porn, I prefer 720p and consider it the lowest level of HD. So my standards aren't the problem here. I can't imagine what someone wanting 1080p or 4K would think of 960x540 being listed as HD.
Disappointment continued, I went through every site on their "network" and downloaded the newest video they have. Not a single one had a video over 960x540. I stand slightly corrected by myself. I just found one DVD with 720p scenes on it, it's of Asa Akira.
Here's my roundup at this point: Beaver Hunt "site" is not Beaver Hunt. It's Barely Legal DVDs.
The magazines aren't magazines. They are 4-5 pictorials from each magazine.
The high quality videos are below average 960x540 quality. Including the ones on the "site" Hustler HD.
But wait... there is a hustlermagazine site that says it has all of the magazines in digital form. How do I know? It's advertised on every page of this Hustler site. Now back to the layout. You enter the site into a sort of hub. It shows 19 available sites in the network. A few examples of the names, Beaver Hunt, Daddy Gets Lucky, Asian Fever, those sound like real standalone sites that are part of a network, but in reality, those three are in order ... Barely Legal series, the Daughter series of DVDs, (including Barely Legal again), Asian Fever is their commonly-known DVD series' Teen Thailand and random scenes taken from DVDs that feature Asian models.
The further I looked into this Hustler site I started noticing chances to "upgrade" my membership. There's a problem there, why would I upgrade something that hasn't been the least bit entertaining?
The site needs a complete overhaul. Advertising as Hustler with "magz" should include all magazines and every part of those magazines. Advertising HD video should result in HD video. Neither of those said on the membership join pages, "Must upgrade to receive HD video and full magazines". A new search engine would help. Surely there's some 720p videos on here, but I've yet to find them. A simple search engine with an HD filter would do. It receives a 60 simply because it works and has porn on it with many big name stars. I'm guessing the higher def videos are included in the upgraded membership, again, the upgraded membership is not mentioned or offered when you join. Not recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Ah the memories of opening my first Hustler!
- I'm downloading the clips from the site, someone else mentioned this and how TBP lists the videos as streaming or in browser only.
- Some of the best models in the world on here!
- Tons of pictures available
- 3 Updates per week
- Cheaper than renting them!
Cons:
- Higher prices than most sites, especially considering the smaller library when compared to videobox, vixeo, pornstarxs.
- I am almost positive that I joined this site last year for $9.95, now it is $34.95. Maybe the trade off is being able to keep the videos?
- Too many anal movies
Bottom Line:
I like the way Hustler has pushed the envelope over the years and for once, actually mean it when I say that when it was magazines instead of online, I really did read the articles and jokes!
The videos are downloading just fine for me, and the majority are of average quality. I'm really thinking the raise in price and not great quality is because they are letting us download and keep the videos.
The preview section of the site is another great one, as it lets you see how the site works, navigation on here is top-notch. I really like the site, but it isn't going to be one that I visit often. Even with 3 updates per week, I can download a full DVD in probably 15-20 minutes, so it isn't worth much more than a join, download everything you want, come back 6 months later.
The big question for me is, is the site worth that high price? Yes, if it is your first time joining it. Upwards of 200 full DVDs from Hustler would cost thousands of dollars to buy. After that, I don't think it would be worth anything more than stopping by once a year.
I'm not really into anal, they have loads of anal, nearly every scene ends in anal and they have full series' with the word anal in the title. This would be another negative for me when considering joining. I've heard a lot of the porn models these days are more into the anal than vaginal because it pays more.
Bottom line, if you haven't been a member, I recommend it for one month, otherwise, can't say I recommend it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the most realistic, most believable and most natural porn site on the internet.
- 5,408 scenes of mostly solo masturbation but also has lesbian and some male/female.
- I've been a member here off and on for over 10 years.
- Uses GMBill, a lesser known biller but I've never had any problems with them.
- Updates daily, sometimes twice.
- Women of nearly all shapes, size and looks.
- Navigation takes some getting used to but I've been a member enough that it's pretty easy to use and find what you're looking for.
- Scenes vary from closeups of the model's face to more explicit scenes that show everything.
- Defines the word erotic in the porn world better than any other site.
- Very high technical quality on videos, see bottom line.
- Categories that make it easy to find what you're looking for once you get used to the names of the categories.
- Very good download speeds (85% of my max)
Cons:
- It can be overwhelming. The model list is next to impossible to use to count the models.
- Will apply to any and everyone that joins it, there will be some models you won't find attractive.
Bottom Line:
A long time ago, I gave this site an 85. That was also when most of the content just focused on the model's face and showed very little nudity. I enjoyed some of those scenes but thought it was too soft which is unheard of from me. I even like non-nude "porn".
The scenes have become more explicit though nowhere near as explicit as most sites. There's a connection, for me, between the model and her willingness to be more explicit, to be more vocal and that's a selling point for me. It's women enjoying themselves naturally and most look very comfortable doing it. I don't even know if that's true. Maybe the ones that just show their face/expressions/moans just aren't in the mood to show more on that day.
I do lean towards and favor the ones that show more. Some of them will pull up porn on their laptop and masturbate while watching it. Which kind of makes me laugh a little since I think it shows us men are more impatient than women. You never see them fast forwarding. I also like the minimal production, the lighting, I have bad eyesight and it gets worse when looking at bright lights. The scenes are very good for those into voyeurism.
The numbers can be a little confusing. With 5,408 videos, I'm using their number on that, this is a very large site. They have 2,269 scenes listed as studio. 1,208 listed as fantasy and adventure. 898 listed as homemade. 411 as close-up. 377 as video diary. 157 as lucubrations and 88 as loose ends.
Most of those are self-explanatory. The loose ends ones are shorter, there's outdoor pissing, talking, and as shown by the number this is a very small part of the site. The video diary ones once fooled me into thinking they were interviews but they're not. All that I've watched are masturbation including some exhibitionism.
The video quality on the newest scenes tops out at 1080p, there's also a 540p version and a 270p version. The scenes are short enough that most of the 1080p versions are at or around 500MB each.
Graphic descriptions usually aren't needed for porn but one of my biggest fetishes is hard nipples. You can watch scenes here where you can see the models nipples getting harder. This content is now very appealing to me. My last review of it was during a period of my porn journey that favored and preferred hardcore content. Now, I can see, hear and enjoy this porn possibly the way it's supposed to be.
I didn't list this as a con only because I think it would detract from the scenes, there are no pictures. Most of these models look like they've got themselves ready to go and perform, so throwing in "how about we take 150 photos real quick" might break that momentum.
It's also one of the few sites that has bios for the models that seem real. They list their favorite books, movies and music. Depending on your own taste in those, you can pick up on one for example, saying she's an ABBA fan.
I do like the girl/girl scenes as these seem to be very believable, a major selling point in lesbian porn but really don't care for the male/female scenes.
I think it would be easy for some to miss the model search feature. I know it's right there but it is very in-depth. I use the nationality filter to look for models that fit a look I usually prefer like Brazil where I found Ana B who might be one of the most expressive and active models on the site. Even giving the view of her masturbating on her stomach. If you're patient with the model search you find out it's very useful. You can pick nationality, type of scene (solo, friends), even age range.
If you're going to complain about anything on it I would say the layout, having 513 pages of 10 scenes per page is overwhelming. Use the model search. They do list the model's name and if you click it you can see all of the model's scenes which at least lets you focus on the models you like best.
I don't think this is a site you can really take in over one month. I'm thinking it's going to take me 3 months to get everything I want.
It's a good example of why it's so hard to score a site a 100. There are just minor problems that stop it from being perfect. On a personal note, I would like to see a few more Asians. And looking for them showed another minor problem, the older, I would even say oldest scenes are 480p. I found that when I found a Japanese model from 2008.
Beyond those minor complaints this is a site that does erotic better than all the sites I see promoting themselves as erotic. I also want to mention I haven't hit any download limits but haven't download more than 10GB or so in any of my days as a member.
Great site, now if I can just get myself to cancel it after another month or two.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that sells itself as being different from the normal, mainstream porn site ... and for the most part it succeeds.
- Daily updates, right at 2,302 videos in HD. If you accept 1280x720 as HD.
- Amateur content, some girl/girl, including some with 3+ girls and some boy/girl. Mostly solo and that's their strength.
- I think the price is fair for unique, exclusive content.
- Would think women who are into watching other women masturbating would be a big market here.
- There's no cameraman asking a million stupid questions...
Cons:
- Continuing from pros is the first con: Things are mostly artsy and tame here. I don't doubt the authenticity of the masturbation we see on this site, but I do wish the girls were more into the masturbation. (Further in BL)
- There's no pictures. If there are pictures I can't find them.
- I'm mostly positive on this site, but the navigation is terrible. I was last a member on here in 2007 (review in my history here). I honestly don't think they've changed anything about the navigation since then.
Bottom Line:
You would think my score might be lower than it is since there's some pretty big cons, but the quality of the content outweighs the downfalls.
This is a fairly straightforward website that promotes enjoyment for their performers/submitter and their audience alike. It's a good take on porn in today's cookie-cutter porn world, but that navigation is really bad. I would go as far as saying that I took off 10 points for the navigation.
The good parts: The girls seem like normal, average girls. Some are playful, some are even silly and many are shy. I like the dark-style of videos since it gives the viewer a little of a voyeur feel like you're peeping in on the masturbation. There's a fairly broad selection of model body types and ages. There are the occasional girl/girl (or even more than 2 girls) scenes and a few boy/girl scenes that sometimes just includes the guy giving the girl oral.
As with any site like this one, there will be models that aren't generally looked at as attractive, but I personally haven't seen any that I would call ugly.
Video quality is good and has been for a long time. They've been making HD videos long enough to have nearly 2,500 HD videos. Another mention that there are no photos. I really wouldn't want photos of the masturbation, but a few (maybe 5-10) in clothes would be nice.
Then there's the navigation:
Going to the home page opens up a scrolling page with the most recent 10 videos. Below those 10 are numbers, 370 (as of 3/15/2016) to be exact. If you're on the home page you are on page 1. You then click on page 2 and there's 10 more videos and the 369 other pages below them. Click on page 3 and you're getting 10 more videos with the numbers below them.
I have to keep a running tab on what page I was last on.
I will give them credit for at least renaming their scenes to whatever name they gave it on the website so you at least can look to see if you've downloaded a scene already.
Over in the left margin there's a group of categories, which I have no clue what they mean. Lucrabations is one. I didn't misspell that. It's how they have it spelled. Sure, I can click on it and find out what type of scene a Lucrabation is, but why should I have to do that?
It gets worse. If you go to the search function you have these options:
Categories (Home Made, Up Close, Etc)
Attribute (Solo, Friends, HD, Full HD)
Display Mode
Date
To show why it frustrates me:
I searched for "all categories, Full HD, Anytime"
0 results.
Which is understandable since they don't have any Full 1080p videos, but why even put the option in there? I already don't know what the categories stand for since they're mostly non-descriptive. Here those are just in case you're curious:
Studio, Home Made, Up Close, Fantasy and Adventures, Lucrabations, Loose Ends.
Fantasy and Adventures seems to be based around location, some are outside, some are in front of an open window, some are in the shower, etc...
With that being said, whose fantasy and adventures are we talking about?
Despite my complaints, I believe they do exactly what they say do. It's a site with a lot of amateur girls masturbating. They do the close-up camera on the face of the model at times, then between the legs, then between the boobs, it's different. I just wish they would make the site a little easier to use or I should say less time-consuming since you have to click through page after page to decide on what to download.
A tip I've been using to make the navigation a little more tolerable is to go into the search, mark all the boxes then enter a from date and a to date. Use a date that is easy to remember and make it a year period. This makes the scroll, click task a little less frustrating and makes it easier to use. I would still say it's the top in its genre. And would recommend it to those who like amateur solo and girl/girl videos, but have no interest in pictures.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Was recommened by a Sex Psychologist friend, highly erotic site
- Nearly 800 videos, res is good over 600 on high end, but bitrate is a bit jumpy at 700k on my machine.
- Videos are downloadable in full scenes
- Real women, not models, most are average to above average in looks which is important (will explain)
- Definitely real, probably the most realistic porn site on the internet that I have seen
Cons:
- No photos
- Very little nudity (will explain in BL)
- Average girls can become boring to look at, especially for $30 a month
- Borders on mind-numbingly repititive, get the feeling of seen one, seen them all.
- Sometimes tries to become very artsy with the settings, lighting, example white lace wrapped around the women in a very dark room.
Bottom Line:
A Sex Psychologist, or Therapist for you Politically Correct types that believe the Sex Organs have not a brain of their own, recommended this site to me as a highly erotic site.
The first thing you should know is that the majority of these videos do not show much more than breasts and some don't even show that. Instead, the focus is on the woman's face as she masturbates. The moans are excellent if you like to hear the moaning, racing breathing patterns, this is erotic. But the effect wore off very fast for me. After 3 videos I was saying, "Come on camera, move down".
The women look to range in age from 18 to probably mid-30s. Most are pretty enough or cute enough. But lets face it, not all pretty women make the most desirable faces during masturbation and especially in orgasm. If I could ever recommend anything to the webmaster it would be to make the last 30 seconds more of a full body shot even if at a distance. The body shaking, full body orgasms are not on here since you can't see the whole body. In my opinion this detracts a great deal from the erotic nature of the videos.
Video quality is about all there is to comment on, the resolution is very good, but that bitrate on a high end computer is stuttering a little. Which you can imagine hurts the erotic nature as well. This isn't Eve Angel or Sophie Moone quality masturbation, but it does have a place for those who maybe want to see something different and original. Recommended for those people only!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It doesn't look like a network hub, but it is and it gives a better deal than the network it's on (see bottom line, this is going to get confusing).
- 3,444 videos on just Idols 69.
- Most of the best Japanese fetishes are at least represented here.
- Very good navigation from switching to site to site with one click and not having to sign in on each site to having around 60 categories and over 100 tags.
- Vendo is the biller and they've moved up to the CCBill and Epoch level of good billers.
- Idols 69 has some of Japan's prettiest models.
- Good download speeds (80% of max) and no download limits.
Cons:
- No subtitles.
- Video quality is limited to the DVD source they are taken from.
- Censoring, this is not a con for me, but will be for others.
Bottom Line:
I'm going to start out with the pro that said it would be confusing to explain. Idols 69, years ago, was a standalone site. It was the site you joined to see Maria Ozawa as they have 20 videos of her. All Japanese Pass then launched a few years later and they used to have Idols 69 included with it. The TBP review still lists Idols 69 as coming with the All Japanese Pass. Since my membership was expiring with All-Japanese Pass, I decided to join Idols 69 (it includes all the sites All-Japanese Pass has too).
An easy way to see that Idols 69 is no longer included with All-Japanese Pass is to look at the total network scenes. All-Japanese Pass has 12,931 scenes. Idols 69 and its network has 16,619. If you subtract those you get 3,688 less scenes with the All-Japanese Pass. Idols 69 shows it having 3,444, so that's where the majority of the missing scenes are.
The rest of the included sites are the same as All-Japanese Pass. I'm just going to focus the rest of this review on the Idols 69 content.
The big con most will find is the video quality. It's a questionable con for me just because this content is mostly better than the newer content coming out of Japan. It's not unlike American porn. The older scenes (10 years ago), are more creative, sometimes they are just plain dumb and more importantly, you get the beautiful AV Idol models. I can deal with lesser resolution. It's like choosing between a $100,000 sports car with no engine and nowhere to put an engine and a $25,000 car that will drive for decades. My reviews have been missing analogies. I'm a bit rusty.
Idols 69 covers all the bases with solo, male/female, group and of course, wacky, like the producer that got the bright idea to give a model an ice cream to masturbate with. It was hard to start. The originally draw for me to Idols 69 was Maria Ozawa, but it also has a lot of masturbation scenes. Masturbation and lesbian scenes are not as common in Japanese porn as American porn. My favorite "action" in porn is a female masturbating. That's where the censor/mosaic is a bonus.
Nearly all masturbation scenes start with a model in clothes, skirt, panties and they stay that way for more than 34 seconds like American porn sites do these days. The models tease themselves over their panties, they play around with the leg openings of the panties, hand down panties and this leads to the ever-elusive wet spot forming on the panties. I never claimed to be anything less than a pervert. That's erotic to me. When you consider how many solo porn sites bring out the critics saying the woman is not having an orgasm or is faking it, those wet spots could be faked but you can tell they are not. Not just from the wet spots but the nipples about to bust out of the bra.
I wasn't even into Japanese porn back when I joined Idols 69 in, I think, 2008 but I was into Idols 69.
They do have some scenes with kinkier parts. I think Japanese porn was the first porn I saw that had women rimming men. There are threesome scenes where one man is behind the woman and she's rimming a guy in front of her. There are some light "forced" scenes, like a husband holding his wife's arms while another man has sex with her.
This is one that dates my porn-using age. They have 293 photo sets on Idols 69. These are downloadable and they are some of the best picture sets online. The Japanese style of photos also varies greatly from the American style. Each set could easily be 3-4 sets. About 1/4 way through the set, the model is nude, then dressed in a new outfit and another 1/4 of the way through, she's nude again then another outfit. They could get me to join Idols 69 with zero videos. I would join it just for the photos. There's a lot of teasing in the photos. There's upskirts, panties, public, it just looks like they stopped doing the photos based on the difference in number of videos and photo sets.
I'm going to wrap up by saying I'll lower All-Japanese Pass by a couple points since joining through Idols 69 (same price) gives you everything All-Japanese Pass has and Idols 69 too. While this isn't the top of the Japanese sites, no subtitles hurts more than the video quality, in my opinion.
It still is a very good site and network especially for a newcomer to Japanese porn. It took me several years to get to the point where I, first, didn't mind the mosaic/censoring to now, where I actually prefer the censoring/mosaic. Which is why subtitles would help even more. These are mostly fun or quirky or weird scenes. Knowing what is being said would make them even better.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An underrated site on a blowjob-focused network. Immoral Live scenes are broadcast live every 2-3 days then placed on the site for downloads.
- Over 2,000 scenes, downloadable photo sets, all 2,000+ scenes have 1080p option.
- Breaks the blowjob theme of the network, Blowpass, the scenes feature masturbation, sex, anal, a little bit of everything and some are even funny.
- 3 new updates per week. There is a counter at the top of the page telling you when the next live show is but I've never caught one live.
- One of those rare situations where one site is better than the overall network.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of my max)
- More sites need to try this live format. It really does at least remove the cookie-cutter feel.
- Navigation is excellent.
Cons:
- Doesn't include access to Adult Time, is a Gamma Entertainment network and site.
- The live filming is at 10 AM EST. You want some porn with your breakfast?
- One big ad at the bottom of the page. It's a minor complaint usually. It reloads to show a different ad. Most of them are just non-moving, regular banner ads but one is from Evil Angel. It it running in full motion and is of a woman's butthole pushing out a huge cum bubble. It's not the most visually pleasing ad.
Bottom Line:
I have been a member at Blowpass for nearly 6 months. I bought a long-term membership to it for very cheap. I think I had a typo in my Blowpass review's score. I would score it in the 87-88 range and will edit it. Immoral Live is a solid 88-90 site by itself.
I still don't understand why this isn't included in the Adult Time membership. Immoral Live is a simple site. They record the scenes live so anything can happen. You get some added humor.
What makes Blowpass and this site good is the navigation. You select the site you want and the model list, the videos, the pictures tabs only show the content from that site. Blowpass is one of the better blowjob networks but one fault I find with it is it tries to sell itself as a network. It has 4 blowjob sites on it. Why do they need 4 sites to sell the exact same theme and genre?
Anyway, Immoral Live takes your average, normal, everyday porn scene and adds the live element to it. The scenes are often long, ranging from 45 minutes to an hour and a half. It makes for some large file sizes to download. One of the newer scenes is almost 7GB for 1080p.
The pornstars are that. You won't see any amateurs or girl next door types. These are pros and that is the reason the live part is so good. I have watched dozens of scenes from Immoral Live that feature a model making a comment like, "This lube sucks. I feel all sticky." To my favorite one, "I'm not ready to orgasm, slow down!" I felt like patting the guy on the back. This site brings a realism to porn we rarely see. It might be a case of "too much content isn't a good thing". There's no way I could go through 2,000+ scenes at nearly an hour on average to find the best ones.
The photo sets to my surprise are not just screencaps. They are real photo sets. It looks like they have a photo studio set, take a hundred or so pictures of the model removing her clothes then 100 or more of the sex. Some of the photo sets are nearing 400 photos in each one.
You could complain about the amount of pro models. You're not going to likely find any new favorites unless their performances show you a different side to them.
The numbers show a little over 2,000 videos and a little over 500 photo sets.
In a rare mention of a male performer, I've always found Porno Dan to be one of the more likable male talents. He has a lot of scenes on Immoral Live and he seems to genuinely enjoy the scenes. I would guess he's in his middle age years and he's one of those male porn stars the women seem to enjoy filming with. A live site like this one is very good for his personality. I'm not going to say he is in every scene but it does seem that way.
The lighting and camerawork for a live scene is also very good. I'm surprised the site doesn't get more attention. The entire Blowpass Network only has around 4,500 scenes, so nearly half of them are coming from Immoral Live. The network is worth joining just for Immoral Live and you get another 2,000 plus blowjob scenes too. It's a good deal.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another extremely high quality site from the company that also runs Sapphic Erotica and Only Cuties.
- The $19.95 TBP discount is well worth it!
- Pictures can be viewed in 3 sizes, downloaded in zips, high end resolution in zips is 2000.
- Videos have several viewing options, HD WMV 1280 high end 4,000 bitrate, also has a WMV smaller resolution at 825 high end 2,000 bitrate, also has Quicktime videos and MPEG as well.
- Models range on 1 to 10 scale from 7 to 10, no uglies here
- Download speeds are right around average for me.
Cons:
- I guess you could say not enough hardcore, but I wasn't expecting any.
- Lets nitpick, model names are same as Sapphic Erotica, but different from most major Euro sites.
- A good portion of the content is filmed in the same locations.
Bottom Line:
As you can see, my cons are hardly cons, just little nitpicks. I had different feelings about joining this site. For one, they have some exclusive content of Eve Angel that I don't have, so it was inevitable that I would join eventually, and two, some of the reviews aren't as positive as I had expected.
I guess this goes into different strokes for different folks. This site has blown me away. The model selection is outstanding, Eve, Eufrat, Stracy, and from what I can see, most are all videos also have picture sets, and these are not vidcaps.
The videos are crystal clear for me, even the lower quality 825 high end are very good and clear. The 1280 ones are exceptionally clear. There have been mentions of the site doesn't seem to have a lot of content, but this isn't true.
Most of the models have at least 3 videos and 3 picture sets, Eufrat and Stracy have around 10 of each. I'm going to say there are over 500 videos and 500 picture sets.
The picture quality is very good, 2,000 high end, and really, they have the quality covered in videos and pictures, they have the quantity covered, they update with a picture set one day, video the next day. All exclusive content. Top tier models, plus some models that probably will be top tier models in the future. This really is a great site and I would recommend it to anyone who likes solo girls, there is some fetish content, fisting, peeing, g/g as well. All in all, it has quickly became a favorite of mine. Recommended!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It’s my most consistent highly-rated site and it does not disappoint
Six updates per month and the last few months have included lesbian scenes
Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
Tags are accurate and the site is still one of the easest to use
4K downloadable videos if you pay the premium price, I pay $34.95 and get 720p and 1080p downloads
Downloadable picture zips only included if you pay at least for the $34.95 membership
The sexiest models in porn
Cons:
It’s not difficult for me but I imagine a new user would be frustrated with the membership tiers
Knowing if anything ever happens to my In The Crack external hard drive, I’ll have to pay at least $80 to download it all again.
Bottom Line:
It’s In The Crack, in this day of mega networks and cookie cutter porn content, In The Crack continues to just do what they do best. They have a simple equation, it goes like this get a top tier looking model, make her look pretty and even down to earth, then have her show how flexible and kinky she is. Sounds like my idea of a perfect date. In The Crack isn’t going to impress you with deep, psychological plots that revolve around the same half-dozen premises you’re used to. They’re going to impress you with gorgeous women doing the most kinky poses.
It says a lot for In The Crack when I say my favorite picture sets are from In The Crack. That’s probably the last thing they are known for, but their colors, settings and the way they dress and present the models is top-notch. I’m never disappointed with any of their picture sets.
I have also never been disappointed by their model selections. White, black, Latina, Asian, they’re all great. It’s also worth mentioning, over the last few months, In The Crack has added a few lesbian sets. Their lesbian sets are often considered the best in porn and I agree.
Here is the easy way to use In The Crack, look at the top of the page and click, “Collections”. That’s how I do it. The scenes are listed in descending order from the newest to oldest. I just go through and download every scene, every photoset and there’s no hesitation. The content is that good and it’s that consistent. I guess you could call it Simplified Porn.
Of course, while the content is simple to know what to download, joining isn’t as simple. I’ll help you out again, the $34.95 tier is the lowest priced option to receive downloadable zips for the photos. That’s the one I join. You also have downloadable videos and a monthly download limit of 300GB. You can go up to $39.95 tier and will receive the 4K downloads on top of everything included at $34.95 and the $39.95 tier includes a monthly download limit of 500GB. For those that want completely unlimited and access to 4K, too, there is the $69.95 tier. It has everything included and no monthly limit.
In The Crack makes some of the most explicit and kinky masturbation porn look classy. You don’t need a plot with their content. It’s all right there on the screen. The plot is all the things your mind is thinking about doing to the model. The models even move a little slower, smoother and are somehow 100% feminine, even with something up their butt. It’s sites like In The Crack that remind me of how much I enjoy porn but sadly, In The Crack also reminds me of how overproduced and glossy the mainstream is in porn.
I have tried finding faults. I have inspected the photos in their highest quality state but no faults. Oh, there is that one lesbian video from the early years of In The Crack’s life that has the sound muted. They even point it out before you download it. It’s as good of a site as I have ever joined.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No site has flirted with 100 more than In the Crack but I have still yet to give it a 100. I think the average for In the Crack from me has been around 96 for about 12 years.
- This review is based on the In The Crack Plus membership which is $34.95/mo. It has everything I want and “need” with a membership. Bottom Line will have details.
- One of the few sites that will leave you torn between wanting a hot model and a nice vacation.
- In my opinion, the best quality photos and videos available from any site.
- Though there are lesbian scenes here and there, the majority of the site is solo content and that’s why it doesn’t get a 100 from me. Solo is my favorite. I may be a little biased. It is the best solo site on the internet.
- Fast downloads (see bottom lin
Cons:
- The tiered pricing is sure to bother some people. I admit, the first time I joined with the tiered pricing, I received the membership that doesn’t include zip downloads for pictures and was quite annoyed.
- Let’s nitpick, the site itself still looks like it did in 2012 and maybe 2007. Does that bother me? Not at all.
Bottom Line:
I have talked about the greatest compliments I can pay a site, and In the Crack has several of those distinctions. I was first a member when they were still having audio problems. The videos, the close-ups, the ways the models are presented, have all been copycatted. But none can fool me into thinking I’m looking at an In the Crack photo or video set. Take a look at their scenes. Tell me a site that has those colors in their scenes, those backdrops, those angles, those shadows, those what are they called? Women? It’s the prettiest porn site in the history of internet porn. Don’t shy away. This is not some run of the mill artsy, glam site. With all the prettiness and perfect colors, one could assume the action is safe and glam. Then you see a model do a split across a bathtub and see how many bathroom objects she can shove in herself. No hole is sacred. No emotion is either. Happiness, sexiness, arrogance maybe, and writhing, pulsating orgasms.
In the Crack hasn’t made it this long without being good at something. Count the years, over 20, and they were always at the top of the industry in quality. It's that unique, it’s that high of quality. And the models put on their best performances. I have a whole list of models that had their best performance on In the Crack. I said it in a previous review. Once you join In the Crack, you may not ever join another site.
I don’t remember when the tiered pricing started but I will say it’s not like the tiers or add-on prices that other sites use. In the Crack played it ethically and to help the potential members. Before the tiered pricing, In the Crack, was $34.95/month. They don’t do promos or coupons. They don’t need to. Their content speaks for itself. The tiered pricing was a move to help potential members. I’m sure they knew that the $34.95 price was steep to the average porn site member. They came out with the basic membership. It’s like a trial and it’s $9.95 for a full month. You can stream any of the videos in SD. You can also view the “small” resolution pictures. Not many sites do that. They’re giving people a chance to experience their content without spending $35. The next step up is a logical one, it’s called Stream. It’s $19.95 and you can stream in SD and 720p. You also can view the large pictures. The next step up was the one that got me awhile back. It’s called Standard. It lets you view all sizes of pictures; stream all sizes AND you can download the 720p videos. That’s where they got me. I didn’t realize you can’t download the pictures. The standard is $24.95. There’s something else to add to this. Starting with Standard, there are download limits. Those are listed on their site. They’re very upfront about it.
For me, since my one mistake of joining Standard, I don’t even fool with looking at the tiers. I want downloads on pictures and videos. You have to jump up to the Plus membership. It’s $34.95 the same price their site was before the tiered pricing. The Plus gets me everything I want. It has 720p and 1080p downloads. The big pictures can be downloaded in zips and it is the membership that will give the non 4K fans, the best experience. They have two more steps up, the 4K and the Ultimate. The 4K explains what it adds and it’s $39.95. The difference between 4K membership and Ultimate is the download limit. I don’t find their limits to be a problem. The Plus equals out to 300 GB per month. I usually hit about 80-150 GB per month on it. I do think the only way the limits really matter is if you have to have 4K. In that case, it’s probably best to join the Ultimate. It’s unlimited and you get 4K. The cost of it may make you decide you don’t have to have 4K. It’s $69.95/mo. If you have a fast internet connection and want 4K, I would do the Ultimate. Set aside a month per year just for In the Crack. It’s what I do.
You will see models’ prettiest content and possibly dirtiest content on this site. You don’t like pictures? Try the pictures from In the Crack. The only thing that stops the 100 is I know the price combined with tiers is just not going to set well with some people. The content itself is an easy 100. I wouldn’t even suggest them to change their tiers or price. It’s something you have to try and see for yourself that if (enter site name) is worth $19.95/mo, In the Crack is worth $34.95 or more per month.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Arguably the most consistent and at this point, possibly the best non-hardcore, solo with some lesbian scenes, site on the internet.
- Updating roughly twice per week.
- CCBill is the billing processor.
- One of the better ranges of races in models. Just in the last month they've had Asian, black, Indian, Latina and white models.
- Premier models, you rarely if ever see an unattractive model on this site.
- I personally like the tiered pricing. I do the $34.95 option and am always satisfied with the content I get with it.
- Video quality is crystal clear even on 720p, photo sets are just as good. Videos go up to 4K, but you have to choose that tier to get those (costs more).
- Production values, settings, outfits, lighting, camerawork, the models performances are all top-notch.
- Navigation is excellent and very easy to use.
- Will have to explain this one in the bottom line, will call it a "hard drive of their own".
Cons:
- Some won't like the tiered memberships. I will try to explain them with examples of what you can get with them.
- Videos are in parts, this is something I've gotten used to and don't mind since there are some parts I wouldn't watch anyway.
Bottom Line:
In the Crack has consistently scored over 95 for me. I just don't know of a site that makes one great scene after another and it's something I've mentioned before, there are models here that I never paid much attention to on other sites. Their content here is much better. Ashley Fires is the best example.
The tiered pricing. The first thing to know is the first time I joined In the Crack, I want to say 2007 or 2008, it was $34.95. I don't remember if they had download limits back then or not. The $34.95 option is what I still join. It gives you all photos, view and download (small and large sizes), it gives you all video download options except 4K. The download limit with it is 10GB per hour, 30GB per day and 300GB per month.
Since the videos are split into parts, I'll use the newest Cindy Starfall, I download the 720p versions. All four parts that make up the full scene are a combined 1.1GB. That's for right at 40 minutes of video. If I went up to 1080p it would be around 2.3GB for those 4 parts.
If you're content with 720p, you can realistically download 250 or so models scenes in a month. Which goes back to the pro I call, "hard drive of their own". I have every In the Crack scene up to January 2019 that I want. I join once a year and can easily get the all of that year's scenes and stay under the download limit. I actually think I could do the 1080p versions and stay under it.
What it amounts to is if you have no In the Crack collection, you might as well take the plunge and join the unlimited for a month. It's $69.95 and you can download all you want including 4K. Their scenes date back to 2001. Once you're caught up, you can easily get by with the $34.95 membership once per year and get caught up.
The models here are not only some of the prettiest on any site they do more here, there's anal play from models that normally don't. There's very hard masturbation from models that normally don't. There are flexibility poses, sexy outfits, there's so little to complain about, I had to find two cons that other people might be bothered by.
I wouldn't call this a glam site since the actions within the site are not what you see on glam sites. But the models are typically made up very nicely and many of them look like they're about to go on a really nice date. The photo sets are a big part of my enjoyment. The Cindy Starfall photo set has around 80 pictures. Of the first 10 photos she's fully dressed, looking really cute and sexy, the next 15-20 have her sexually provocative poses with only her hose stopping you from seeing her fully nude ass and pussy, then the rest of the set she's removed the hose and eventually is fully nude and masturbating. That is a lost art in today's porn. There's posing, teasing, fully clothed, and everything that made pre-tube site "nude, nude, nude" hardcore porn, great.
They have 1,591 scenes, usually a minimum of 30-40 minutes of video in each of those and a photo set with each.
The one change that I have noticed is the scenes continue to go away from the gynecological style the site was known for in the earlier days. They still live up to their name of In the Crack with some extreme close-ups, including during masturbation but you spend more time looking at the outside of the model's orifices than than the inside of them. It's like taking a very artsy site with all the beauty those bring and deciding to suddenly make it a hardcore masturbation site.
Very few sites can pull this style off and I'm certain at this point that none have been doing it longer than In the Crack. On those tiered prices, something I always thought was a nice option for those that haven't been a member is the $9.95 option. You can view the small pictures and stream the SD versions of the videos. That's better than most sites trials and it's 30 days with no limitations on how much you stream. They also have a $24.95 option that lets you download up to the 720p versions, but you can't download the pictures. I do think the $44.95 tier is a problem. It adds 4K downloads but you still have a download limit and those files are huge. I think if you have to have 4K, you might as well join the unlimited plan. I'm completely fine and content with the 720p version and downloadable photo zips so the $34.95 one works fine for me.
They have over 1,000 models and the top models have more than one scene. I think Jynx Maze has 4 and I would rate those 4 scenes in her top 10 scenes of her entire career. Cindy Starfall is another, you could look over my reviews and see where I've mentioned her over the years. Her scenes here at In the Crack are the best of her career. They work some kind of magic there.
I'll end by saying this is one of 3 sites that I could see scoring 100. I haven't ever done that but while not perfect for everyone, they're very close to perfect for me. Highly recommended for those that love to see beautiful, naked women in their most spread open and bent over poses.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, in 2018, one of the top 3 porn sites on the internet.
- Tiered memberships let you pick your level of quality and what all you can download.
- A fair but limited "cheap" option of $9.95, will go over the options in BL.
- If you're on this site it's for the models. Few if any sites regularly, consistently come up with so many high level models.
- Picture sets here are some of the best you'll find, including the production qualities with settings, clothing, even the colors.
- Updates every 3 days, each update includes videos, pictures and streaming "mini-vids".
- Download speeds are very high for me (90% and up of my max).
- A big site considering it's mostly solo models.
- CCBill is the biller.
- I join once a year for 1-2 months and download the content that has been released since my last join. I download and keep every set.
Cons:
- The tiered membership options won't be a favorite of some. Be sure to read in the BL to avoid a mistake I made last year.
- The older content had more of the gyno-style of porn but the newer isn't as bad, though it's still "In the Crack".
Bottom Line:
When I first started reviewing porn sites, I had standards, criteria but that was 12 years ago. I'm older now and probably dumber! What I do know though, every year around the American holidays, I join In the Crack. I do that because I'm always off some of December and it let's me download more than in other months. I won't call this the best site but I will say it's one of the top 2-3.
Porn, like so many other things, has tried to adapt to the consumers wants. Not In the Crack. They are still shooting the same porn they shot in 2001. It's 90% or more solo. The models look better here than on any site. The settings on this site are better than any other site. And every scene starts with the model fully dressed in appropriate clothes. Their makeup is near perfect and natural looking. The lighting is even top-notch. The only thing I could complain about with the content is it can be gynecological. But tell me, if you were told you were going to be a beautiful models gynecologist would you or I really complain?
One of my favorite parts is ITC is generally very selective of their models. And the ones that do good have multiple sets. An example of a model that they have multiple sets of who I think is fairly popular in mainstream porn, Gina Valentina, I've looked her content up on other sites but never downloaded and kept it. Her sets on ITC are some of the best on the site. I've always mentioned sites that make the models happy and how they seem to get better performances from the models. ITC does that.
The tiered memberships can be confusing, they have 6 tiers. I'll try to separate them:
Basic, Streaming and Standard all have major restrictions. The first two have no downloads of photos or videos. Standard has no photo downloads but does offer 360p and 720p video downloads.
Plus, 4K and Ultimate offer downloads of everything with Plus being my choice ($34.95), 4K just gives 4K videos on top of the Plus options. Ultimate ($69.95) brings in the next limits. It's completely unlimited. Standard, Plus and 4K have DL Limits (hourly, daily, monthly). Years ago, that was a major no-no but I have no problem staying within the limits. I download the 720p versions of the videos, most files average 450MB. I could easily run through 10GB (Hourly limit on Plus) in 15 minutes but because I am only downloading the last year's content, I only need to average about 4 sets/models per day, about 6GB. If I had never been a member and wanted to get all the content, I would pay for the Ultimate.
This content is unique because it's solo porn that starts out with the models looking very pretty, feminine even, lady-like and ends with them shoving their fist in themselves or a huge dildo. They cover everything in-between from teasing in their clothes (upskirts, bending over) to light touching and masturbation to the more "hardcore" masturbation. They're not in a rush like most 2018 porn seems to be.
It kind of makes me feel old as I start to tell about having to walk through 12 inches of snow to get to watch nicely-paced, erotic porn.
Not only are they the best at what they do but I'm not even for sure they have much competition these days. I wouldn't compare them to FTV since this is a little more personal than FTV. It's you and the model.
Navigation is as easy as possible. Coming up with a content count is a little harder. They've been releasing roughly 10 scenes per month since 2008. Before then they released usually 1 set per month and that goes back to 2001. It's well-over 1,200 scenes.
It's worth mentioning that I did not take points off for the split videos. They, like FTV, shoot each video with an action in it, then they split the video for the next action. It does allow you to download your favorite parts that way. I really don't know if I would prefer full videos but I'm okay with the split videos now.
I kept looking for 1 point to take off and found it while working on the review. The site logs me off about every 20 minutes. How is that for nitpicking?
This is very much a premium site. I know to some it's not premium, some will even hate it because they want hardcore or they want something ITC doesn't do but for me, a person who is rarely that happy with porn sites in 2018, it's perfect because it does what it says. It does it better than anyone else does. It reminds me of when you buy a music album and you don't have to skip one or two songs. For me, they get everything right. Except logging me off every 20 minutes.
In a few weeks, I'll have all of the 2018 content downloaded from ITC and this speaks to how much I like their content, I'll still be stopping by their site monthly to see who the new models are. I don't get that with other sites. I used to but now there's only 3-4 sites that get my attention throughout the year and ITC is one. I was due a 99 and honestly can only think of one other site that I would score this high.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A site that doesn't do a lot of things, but does the things it does, better than any other site.
- Updates 3 times per week and the back catalog is older than 10 years.
- Feels like they're selling me a house, the locations, colors, brightness, contrast, are all exactly how I like them.
- New pricing plan, which I'll go into in the bottom line.
- In my opinion, the best photosets available.
- Videos are very good, but are sometimes gynecological.
- Every model on here looks better here than on any other site.
- 100% exclusive content.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Navigation is good as soon as you figure out "collections" means models.
Cons:
- A blunt one, it can become redundant.
- Another blunt one, some of the older videos have various problems, audio, video clarity, etc...
- Though in the pros, it has a con to it, the new pricing system
Bottom Line:
There's really not much to find wrong with In The Crack. Though I can completely understand those who don't like the extreme closeups.
It would be hard to pick out even one model who isn't worth checking out. The photosets are shot in a very realistic style, almost all sets start with the model fully clothed with plenty of clothing teases, up skirts, up shorts, panties sliding over and so on. Which is where there's a sharp contrast in the content. The later content in each set is the complete opposite. There's no teasing, it's up-close, in-your-face nudity. Fairly extreme or hardcore masturbation, if that's possible, and it's shot professionally.
This is one of the few sites I'll talk about having production values and great locations. It's like they dropped each model into a perfect environment. It's hard to believe this is a porn review. The woman's clothes often blends perfectly with the backgrounds (beaches, houses).
The new(er) pricing system allows a cheaper membership for those who don't download anything over 720p, it's $24.95/mo. and is perfect for me. Not that it's a huge difference, but I used to pay $34.95 for the site and only download the 720p versions of the videos.
They have multiple options including streaming only video, which also makes the site more accessible to those who are interested, but don't want to pay the premium price.
The main con of the site is you can and probably will get a little bored with it. It isn't because the content is boring, it's that the content is very similar from scene to scene.
The other con about audio and video issues is just based on maybe 8-12 scenes from the earliest years of the site (early 2000s).
Then there's the new pricing system's one con. It's $24.95 for 720p max download videos, BUT you cannot download the photo sets. My exact words were, "Are you fucking kidding me?" I like the photos as much, if not more than the videos, so I had to pay $10 more to receive zip downloads on the photos. That's frustrating. All of the payment options above the $24.95 price are based on being able to download larger video files.
So, if you prefer videos, but don't mind 720p resolution, the $24.95 option is a great deal. If you prefer pictures, you're going to have to pay the old regular price of $34.95. It lowered my score a bit. Still, I think they do their niche better than anyone and would recommend it to anyone.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- This site continues to push the technical quality boundaries and probably has the highest production value of any site.
- Numbers will be broken down in the bottom line. The video quality is and has been at 1920x1080 for a good while. The picture quality also is an impressive 2400x1800 in "large" quality and come zipped.
- While the update frequency may not be comparable to some of the big networks, they average between 10-11 updates per month.
- The settings on this site are different from most sites you will join. From tropical locations to indoors at large houses to farms and lush fields. The outfits are also fitting of the settings. The only site I know of that goes through this much setup is ALS Scan.
- You'll be hard-pressed to find a model who isn't attractive.
- Download speeds are excellent (95% of max)
- Navigation is easy to use and also gives you the options to search by year, model name, age, nationality and location.
- Will further these in the BL.
Cons:
- Probably the only real valid con. I think there should be more pictures in the photo sets. Maybe 300 even. It's a con that's a compliment. The pictures are some of the best I've seen, but they skip a lot of the teasing seen in the videos.
- I'm still going to complain about the price, but I only join it once per year so it's not a very big complaint. I use it as my Christmas present to myself.
- This one was more frustration than anything. There was a few days where the site would open, models could be viewed, but when you clicked on a model, it wouldn't let me go into the download section. Lasted 3-4 hours each time. It only happened twice though.
Bottom Line:
This re-review started out as one of the harder ones I've done. I have mostly joined networks the past year and at first found myself frustrated with the update frequency of In The Crack. Keeping in mind, I had all the content I wanted coming into 2011's updates. It almost was enough of an initial letdown to stop me from rejoining this year, but they had 4 Jinx/Jynx Maze updates and that pushed me to join. As the subscription has went on, my respect and enjoyment from this site keeps growing. This will be slightly different than most reviews I write.
Production values of this site have made me notice production values. I wanted to bitch and gripe about the "only" 11 or so average of updates per month, but when I started looking at the sets, I realized it wouldn't be possible to make that many updates. They have settings ranging from tropical beaches to large houses to country/farm settings and the models' outfits fit the settings accordingly. When I compare this to the majority of sites I have joined in the last year where the setting is almost always the same, the outfits are almost always the same or similar at least, it made me look at this site differently.
On August 13th, 2007, ITC had their first 1920x1080 video, ironically, featuring the model August. Considering this site has been around since 2001, it may sound like half their content would be lesser quality, but it's not true. ITC's original problem was lack of updates. So for once, a lack of updates in the early years of a site's life is going to really help here. An example of this: For the year 2002, they had a total of 11 updates...for the whole year. In May of 2011, they had 13 updates just for May.
As of February 20th, 2012, they have 622 scenes. Of those, 509 have the 1920x1080 option. Those 509 have three video options, 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 640x360. The earlier 113 scenes have two video options of 640x480 and 320x240. This made me re-think complaining about updates since they are releasing 100+ updates per year now, combined with the high production value and high technical quality. Another thing I have noticed about their content is if they have a model I collect or consider a favorite, their content of her will be near or at the top of my list of her content. This is especially true of the pictures. Now I have a complaint.
If I could change one thing about this site it is that I would add more pictures to the sets. With all the time and probably money spent on the best models, settings, outfits, why not bump those picture sets up to 300 or more photos? It would flesh out the updates too.
Possible con for some and I originally listed it as a con in my last review, but I think there is a reason for this. The videos do not have a full scene download option, they are each broken into parts and the parts represent a certain action you're going to see in each part. One part is pissing, one part is stripping, one part is masturbation, one part is close-ups and you get the drift. I would guess these different actions require moving to different locations in the setting and also think it gives the members a choice of what they want to see since I know some are disgusted by pissing, even the close-ups, so you can pick and choose what you want. A full scene option would be nice, since if I like a model, I'm going to download all parts anyway, but I'm more neutral on it than calling it a pro or con.
You will occasionally get the feeling of the scenes being formulaic, but I'm thinking that's what they're going for. You're going to get what you expect from each scene. This is again where I think more photos in the sets would make an improvement.
Another thing I think could help here is more girl/girl scenes. By my count, out of the 622 scenes, they have 17 girl/girl scenes with at least one being girl/girl/girl. Their lesbian scenes are easily some of the best I've seen. I don't even think it needs to become a regular part of the site, but maybe 1 or 2 per month just to break the monotony of the formulaic solo scenes.
With all this being said, I think they suceed at creating a different and unique porn site. I would estimate after this last membership that I have around 90% of their content and have yet to delete one scene. That far outweighs giving me 1,000s of scenes that I will only keep a handful of. It's one of those that I can't recommend highly enough. I do think viewing the content with an open mind, noticing the production value, the work that is put into the sets, adds even more to its value. I still won't join more than once per year though. In a way though, maybe that's a positive too? Instead of joining every 3 months and sifting through the tons of updates, I know I'm downloading most everything new for the past year.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the highest quality technical sites on the internet. Breakdown in bottom line.
- Updates started slow in 2001, but are now coming at a rate of roughly 3 per week, includes photos and videos per update.
- Several models you won't see on many other sites and some I've never seen on other sites, the positive to that, also has most of the usual stars.
- Picture sets are zipped and can be downloaded in small or large sizes.
- Plenty of tease, plenty of masturbation and plenty of close-ups.
- Locations are usually almost as beautiful as the models.
- Models, for me, are as close to 100% downloads. Very few if any models that aren't stunningly attractive.
- Navigation is good once you get the hang of it.
- Download speed hasn't been a problem am downloading at 95% of my max speed.
Cons:
- Videos are split into parts. Almost didn't put this here in cons since there is a pattern to the splits. One may be the lead-in/tease. The next pissing. The next masturbation. The splits don't so much overlap as older split videos did.
- Video quality on older sets pales in comparison to the newer videos.
- Photo sets could be bigger. Seeing that the scenes as a whole total nearly an hour on average, anything less than 100 photos seems to be shorting the photo fans.
Bottom Line:
I thought I would try to review this site a little differently than normal. The reason being, early in the site's life the updates were sporadic and the quality was okay. They've picked up the pace quite a bit while improving the technical quality a great deal.
From March 2001 to August 5, 2007 the site had a total of only 113 updates. That's less than 2 per month. The quality on these videos tops out at 640x480 and the lower quality option is 320x240.
The photos during this time ranged from 758 high end to 1800 high end.
Starting on August 13th, 2007 the videos top quality jumped to 1920x1080, there also is a 1280x720 option and a 640x360 option.
Besides the big upgrade in quality, the updates started coming more often. Since August 2007 through November 2010, there has been 367 updates or an average of roughly 10 updates per month and all have been with the 1920x1080 option.
The pictures got another boost in late 2007 to 2000 high end and later in 2008 went up to 2400 high end.
I just found that worth mentioning since not only have they increased their updates around 400%, but tripled the technical quality too. That makes the price (35 USD) not a con. It's nice to see a site changing everything for the better.
Problems with the site, there are speculum parts, pissing parts and the close-ups may be a bit much for some. The good thing here, these are usually separated by part so if you would have fast-forwarded those parts, you can just save the hassle by not downloading the parts you don't like.
No problems with the models at all. A very good blend of models from all around the world and a good mix of ethnic backgrounds.
Navigation is broken down for you. You can search by model name. Model nationality. Model age. Year released. And a few bonus points here for naming the videos whatever the scene is named. Instead of some generic number name that no one but their programmer understands.
Unless I missed something there are no boy/girl scenes, but there are some girl/girl scenes with the vast majority being solo. I'm thinking I'm going to need to ask Santa Claus for a new hard drive just for the content I get from this site.
By percent, 76% of the sets are available in 1920x1080. I'm almost positive no other site can say that. My biggest surprise was the diversity of models. It looks to have started out with more Euro models, but it has balanced out with Hispanic, Asian, American (white and black) models showing up too.
I guess if I had to pick something to change it would be to offer a full scene download for those of us that have fast connections. Oh and it signs me out too often. A download had finished, maybe 5 minutes passed and I clicked the next scene to download and was signed out.
That's minor though when you consider the overall quality of this site. Would push the score even higher if the photo sets had more photos in them. Highly recommended especially for tech quality lovers.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 13 site network for $19.95
- Several of the sites are very good, The Boss XXX, Latin Booty Girls, Bit Tits and Curvy Asses were my favorites.
- There are video caps, so you can preview before downloading, but no pictures that I have found
- Download speed above average, getting 1000kb/s on 10M connection
- Nice diverse content from Arab to Latina to interracial
Cons:
- No pictures, so I can't comment much about those, the vid caps are ok to look at
- Video quality is below average 320 on high end
- Navigation is something next to driving a 1968 car without power steering, it just seems clunky
- Site names are misleading, Cum Brushers? Human Toilet Bowls? These names have nothing to do with the content for you really twisted fetish types
- Content becomes very boring as does the sites
Bottom Line:
Everything started out fine when I joined. The videos could be improved or better be improved or else they are going to fall way behind. No pictures is frustrating these days, since most networks are now including pictures.
The Boss XXX is a great site. I really enjoyed nearly all of the movies on it. I also liked the Latin Booty Girls and Big Tits and Curvy Asses, moreso for the curvy asses. Having said that, this is another network that could just throw all their material onto one site and save us the trouble of having to go from site to site trying to find the content we are looking for.
This is why I mentioned the misleading names. Cum Brushers is a boneheaded attempt to show women brushing their teeth with cum. Why not just call it swallowing? Human toilet bowl would imply that someone is about to get really messy, but that isn't it. They have the woman parade around a toilet bowl, then treat her like shit. I think I'm burnt out on the abuse sites, and this one doesn't help matters.
I'm putting that as a warning to those reading this. There are several sites on here that involve spitting, writing on the girls faces and your typical Lee Stone type garbage.
Movie quality is below average throughout the network, when you look at HD specs that most sites are offering, you see a 1240, the high end on these is a 340.
Because of this and the abuse factor, I can't recommend it based on my experience with it. If you like abuse, you may enjoy it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Really surprising site/network, much bigger than I had anticipated.
- You get these sites, Innocent High, Her Freshman Year, The Real Workout, Oye Loca, This Girl Sucks, Titty Attack, Solo Interviews, Euro City Life and Trailer Trash Cuties for the very good TBP price of $17.87
- Technical quality is very good, the majority of videos I have downloaded are 1280x720. Also has zipped pictures and zipped screenshots, though neither are high quality, but still a nice touch.
- Excellent download speeds for me, about 98% of download max that I've seen.
- Network navigation is pretty good. They have a main page I go through called Team Skeet, they have each of the sites listed in the sidebar. You just click them and go, no signing in for each site.
- Very good site if you like schoolgirl uniforms and/or girls who could genuinely pass as barely legal.
- Bonus sites are worth checking out though none really stand out. I like Real Workout and Oye Loca the best of those.
Cons:
- Kind of confusing when signing up. I didn't know the payment processor. So I went to alternate billing with Epoch, but received a message from the other biller to tell me I had signed up with Epoch. See, confusing!
- Went to see the bonus sites and received a full page ad that looked just like the site itself. Clicked it and realized it was an upsell. Neither of these two charged me anything extra, but it is worth mentioning as a bit of a hassle.
- Can be repetitive since the content is mostly niche-related.
Bottom Line:
I had been meaning to join this site for at least a year. They had 3 updates that I wanted to get, Micah Moore, Dakoda Brookes and the ultra-rare Cuban Gem Charity Jade (Not even saying what I would do to her, divorce court and Eve Angel would hate me!). Once inside, I realized they had a bunch more of my favorites. If you're into little Latin models and haven't seen Emy Reyes, she is worth checking out. There also are a lot of models who I have never seen before.
The action on Innocent High is mostly hardcore boy/girl, minor spank with a ruler, bend her over and teach her quantum physics. Not all sets are in classrooms, some go into tutor sessions, the stories with each are decent. Usually funny and filled with cheesy humor. If I didn't know better, I would say this site is run by one of the bigger networks like Reality Kings or Bang Bros. The action is usually good, girls are mostly all top-tier and are at least believable in their roles.
As a standalone site, I would go maybe 85-86 for Innocent High. There are roughly 260 sets, that's full video, zip photo file of 150-250 pictures and 200-300 zipped screenshots. So you can see this site alone has a large collection. From what I can see they update at least 2 times a week on this network, the past week, Valentine special, got 3 updates. The value comes in with the bonus/network sites.
The Real Workout - I'm a sucker for the hot girl in the gym working out. This site has 38 sets, video, photos.
Oye Loca - Latina/Hispanic models, hardcore. Some fairly rare models in here and one of the better all Latina/Hispanic sites I've been on. Roughly 85 models with full sets.
Solo Interviews - Masturbation, pretty good site, but I like solos. Around 75 models here with full sets.
The other sites all fit right with whatever their name is and have a combined 100 or so more sets. The sites Euro City Life and Trailer Park Cuties are in my opinion, total wastes. The videos JUST on these two are split into 30 parts! No full scenes, no pictures, so I'm not including those in the total count. I don't know anyone who is going to download 30 one minute clips.
The total for the network as a whole is roughly 500 sets, full scenes, zip photos. That is a lot of content considering it is exclusive and is niche orientated.
On the complaints, the site's navigation is pretty solid for a network. It's nice not to have to sign in on every site. I like sites that keep it simple stupid and this one does that. Just scroll down each site and see all of the updates. It's as easy as that. The upsells haven't showed since the first time I was in the member's area, so that isn't too bad.
Update schedule can be confusing. They call the girls, "students" on all of the sites so from what I can see, the updates are around 3 per week for the whole network.
Recommended for one month/once a year, I've downloaded around 150 scenes I intend to keep. Be sure to check out Charity and Emy if you're on there.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
